ML14233A193: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML14233A193 | | number = ML14233A193 | ||
| issue date = 08/21/2014 | | issue date = 08/21/2014 | ||
| title = | | title = Acceptance Review - License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-510, Revision 2 | ||
| author name = Sanders C | | author name = Sanders C | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-2 | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-2 | ||
| addressee name = Duke P | | addressee name = Duke P | ||
| addressee affiliation = PSEG Nuclear, LLC | | addressee affiliation = PSEG Nuclear, LLC | ||
| docket = 05000272, 05000311 | | docket = 05000272, 05000311 | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| document type = Acceptance Review Letter, E-Mail | | document type = Acceptance Review Letter, E-Mail | ||
| page count = 1 | | page count = 1 | ||
| project = TAC:MF4574, TAC:MF4575 | |||
| stage = Acceptance Review | |||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:1 Sanders, Carleen From: | |||
Sanders, Carleen Sent: | |||
Thursday, August 21, 2014 10:06 AM To: | |||
Duke, Paul R. (Paul.Duke@pseg.com) | |||
==Subject:== | |||
Salem Unit 1 & 2: Acceptance Review Request to Use TSTF-510 (MF4574 and MF4575) | |||
: Paul, | |||
ByletterdatedJuly28,2014(ADAMSAccessionNo.ML14210A484),PSEGNuclearLLC(PSEG)submittedalicense amendmentrequestforSalemNuclearGeneratingStation,UnitNos.1and2(Salem).Theproposedamendmentwould modifytechnicalspecification(TS)requirementsregardingsteamgeneratortubeinspectionsandreportingasdescribed inTSTF510,Revision2,RevisiontoSteamGeneratorProgramInspectionFrequenciesandTubeSampleSelection.In addition,theproposedamendmentwouldreviseSalemUnitNo.2sTSs6.8.4.i,SteamGenerator(SG)Program, 6.9.1.10,SteamGeneratorTubeInspectionReport,andthebasessectionof3/4.4.6,SteamGenerator(SG)Tube Integrity,toremoveunnecessaryinformationrelatedtotheoriginalSalemUnitNo.2Westinghousesteamgenerators. | |||
ThepurposeofthisletteristoprovidetheresultsoftheU.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommission(NRC)staffsacceptance reviewofthisamendmentrequest.Theacceptancereviewwasperformedtodetermineifthereissufficienttechnical informationinscopeanddepthtoallowtheNRCstafftocompleteitsdetailedtechnicalreview.Theacceptancereview isalsointendedtoidentifywhethertheapplicationhasanyreadilyapparentinformationinsufficienciesinits characterizationoftheregulatoryrequirementsorthelicensingbasisoftheplant. | |||
ConsistentwithSection50.90ofTitle10oftheCodeofFederalRegulations(10CFR),anamendmenttothelicense (includingthetechnicalspecifications)mustfullydescribethechangesrequested,andfollowingasfarasapplicable,the formprescribedfororiginalapplications.Section50.34of10CFRaddressesthecontentoftechnicalinformation required.Thissectionstipulatesthatthesubmittaladdressthedesignandoperatingcharacteristics,unusualornovel designfeatures,andprincipalsafetyconsiderations. | |||
TheNRCstaffhasreviewedyourapplicationandconcludedthatitdoesprovidetechnicalinformationinsufficientdetail toenabletheNRCstafftocompleteitsdetailedtechnicalreviewandmakeanindependentassessmentregardingthe acceptabilityoftheproposedamendmentintermsofregulatoryrequirementsandtheprotectionofpublichealthand safetyandtheenvironment.Giventhelesserscopeanddepthoftheacceptancereviewascomparedtothedetailed technicalreview,theremaybeinstancesinwhichissuesthatimpacttheNRCstaffsabilitytocompletethedetailed technicalreviewareidentifieddespitecompletionofanadequateacceptancereview.Youwillbeadvisedofanyfurther informationneededtosupporttheNRCstaffsdetailedtechnicalreviewbyseparatecorrespondence. | |||
Ifyouhaveanyquestions,pleasecontactmeat3014151603 | |||
CarleenSanders,ProjectManager PlantLicensingBranchI2 DivisionofOperatingReactorLicensing OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation | |||
DocketNos.50272and50311}} | |||
Latest revision as of 17:20, 10 January 2025
| ML14233A193 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 08/21/2014 |
| From: | Sanders C Plant Licensing Branch 1 |
| To: | Duke P Public Service Enterprise Group |
| Sanders C | |
| References | |
| TAC MF4574, TAC MF4575 | |
| Download: ML14233A193 (1) | |
Text
1 Sanders, Carleen From:
Sanders, Carleen Sent:
Thursday, August 21, 2014 10:06 AM To:
Duke, Paul R. (Paul.Duke@pseg.com)
Subject:
Salem Unit 1 & 2: Acceptance Review Request to Use TSTF-510 (MF4574 and MF4575)
- Paul,
ByletterdatedJuly28,2014(ADAMSAccessionNo.ML14210A484),PSEGNuclearLLC(PSEG)submittedalicense amendmentrequestforSalemNuclearGeneratingStation,UnitNos.1and2(Salem).Theproposedamendmentwould modifytechnicalspecification(TS)requirementsregardingsteamgeneratortubeinspectionsandreportingasdescribed inTSTF510,Revision2,RevisiontoSteamGeneratorProgramInspectionFrequenciesandTubeSampleSelection.In addition,theproposedamendmentwouldreviseSalemUnitNo.2sTSs6.8.4.i,SteamGenerator(SG)Program, 6.9.1.10,SteamGeneratorTubeInspectionReport,andthebasessectionof3/4.4.6,SteamGenerator(SG)Tube Integrity,toremoveunnecessaryinformationrelatedtotheoriginalSalemUnitNo.2Westinghousesteamgenerators.
ThepurposeofthisletteristoprovidetheresultsoftheU.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommission(NRC)staffsacceptance reviewofthisamendmentrequest.Theacceptancereviewwasperformedtodetermineifthereissufficienttechnical informationinscopeanddepthtoallowtheNRCstafftocompleteitsdetailedtechnicalreview.Theacceptancereview isalsointendedtoidentifywhethertheapplicationhasanyreadilyapparentinformationinsufficienciesinits characterizationoftheregulatoryrequirementsorthelicensingbasisoftheplant.
ConsistentwithSection50.90ofTitle10oftheCodeofFederalRegulations(10CFR),anamendmenttothelicense (includingthetechnicalspecifications)mustfullydescribethechangesrequested,andfollowingasfarasapplicable,the formprescribedfororiginalapplications.Section50.34of10CFRaddressesthecontentoftechnicalinformation required.Thissectionstipulatesthatthesubmittaladdressthedesignandoperatingcharacteristics,unusualornovel designfeatures,andprincipalsafetyconsiderations.
TheNRCstaffhasreviewedyourapplicationandconcludedthatitdoesprovidetechnicalinformationinsufficientdetail toenabletheNRCstafftocompleteitsdetailedtechnicalreviewandmakeanindependentassessmentregardingthe acceptabilityoftheproposedamendmentintermsofregulatoryrequirementsandtheprotectionofpublichealthand safetyandtheenvironment.Giventhelesserscopeanddepthoftheacceptancereviewascomparedtothedetailed technicalreview,theremaybeinstancesinwhichissuesthatimpacttheNRCstaffsabilitytocompletethedetailed technicalreviewareidentifieddespitecompletionofanadequateacceptancereview.Youwillbeadvisedofanyfurther informationneededtosupporttheNRCstaffsdetailedtechnicalreviewbyseparatecorrespondence.
Ifyouhaveanyquestions,pleasecontactmeat3014151603
CarleenSanders,ProjectManager PlantLicensingBranchI2 DivisionofOperatingReactorLicensing OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation
DocketNos.50272and50311