IR 05000331/2011301: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML11213A276
| number = ML11213A276
| issue date = 07/28/2011
| issue date = 07/28/2011
| title = ER 05000331-11-301(DRS), on 06/26/2011-07/13/2011, NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC, Duane Arnold Energy Center, Initial License Examination Report
| title = Er 05000331-11-301(DRS), on 06/26/2011-07/13/2011, NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC, Duane Arnold Energy Center, Initial License Examination Report
| author name = Peterson H
| author name = Peterson H
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II/DRS/OLB
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II/DRS/OLB
| addressee name = Costanzo C R
| addressee name = Costanzo C
| addressee affiliation = NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC
| addressee affiliation = NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC
| docket = 05000331
| docket = 05000331
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:uly 28, 2011
[[Issue date::July 28, 2011]]


Mr. Christopher Vice President NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC 3277 DAEC Road Palo, IA 52324-9785
==SUBJECT:==
DUANE ARNOLD ENERGY CENTER NRC INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION REPORT 05000331/2011301(DRS)


SUBJECT: DUANE ARNOLD ENERGY CENTER NRC INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION REPORT 05000331/2011301(DRS)
==Dear Mr. Costanzo:==
On July 14, 2011, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed the initial operator licensing examination process for license applicants employed at your Duane Arnold Energy Center (DAEC). The enclosed report documents the results of those examinations.
 
Preliminary observations noted during the examination process were discussed on July 1, 2011, with you, and other members of your staff. An exit meeting was conducted by telephone on July 14, 2011, between Mr. G. Rushworth, Assistant Operations Manager - Training, of your staff and Mr. C. Zoia, Chief Operator Licensing Examiner, to review the proposed final grading of the written examination for the license applicants. The NRC confirmed the station submitted documentation noting that there were no post-examination comments for consideration during NRC grading of the examination.
 
The NRC examiners administered an initial license examination operating test during the week of June 26, 2011. The written examination was administered by DAEC training department personnel on July 8, 2011. Six Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and four Reactor Operator (RO)
applicants were administered license examinations. The results of the examinations were finalized on July 14, 2011. All ten applicants passed all sections of their respective examinations. Six applicants were issued Senior Operator licenses and four were issued Operator Licenses.


==Dear Mr. Costanzo:==
The written examination and other related written examination documentation will be withheld from public disclosure for 24 months at the request of Mr. G. Rushworth. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
On July 14, 2011, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed the initial operator licensing examination process for license applicants employed at your Duane Arnold Energy Center (DAEC). The enclosed report documents the results of those examinations. Preliminary observations noted during the examination process were discussed on July 1, 2011, with you, and other members of your staff. An exit meeting was conducted by telephone on July 14, 2011, between Mr. G. Rushworth, Assistant Operations Manager - Training, of your staff and Mr. C. Zoia, Chief Operator Licensing Examiner, to review the proposed final grading of the written examination for the license applicants. The NRC confirmed the station submitted documentation noting that there were no post-examination comments for consideration during NRC grading of the examination. The NRC examiners administered an initial license examination operating test during the week of June 26, 2011. The written examination was administered by DAEC training department personnel on July 8, 2011. Six Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and four Reactor Operator (RO) applicants were administered license examinations. The results of the examinations were finalized on July 14, 2011. All ten applicants passed all sections of their respective examinations. Six applicants were issued Senior Operator licenses and four were issued Operator Licenses. The written examination and other related written examination documentation will be withheld from public disclosure for 24 months at the request of Mr. G. Rushworth. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).


Sincerely,/RA by B. Palagi for/ Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-331 License No. DPR-49  
Sincerely,
/RA by B. Palagi for/
Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-331 License No. DPR-49


===Enclosures:===
===Enclosures:===
1. Operator Licensing Examination Report 05000331/2011301(DRS)  
1. Operator Licensing Examination Report 05000331/2011301(DRS)
w/Attachment: Supplemental Information 2. Simulation Facility Report


===w/Attachment:===
REGION III==
Supplemental Information 2. Simulation Facility Report cc w/encls: Distribution via ListServ Enclosure 1 U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III License No: DPR-49 Report No: 05000331/2009301(DRS)
License No: DPR-49 Report No: 05000331/2009301(DRS)
Licensee: NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC Facility: Duane Arnold Energy Center Location: Palo, IA Dates: June 26 through July 13, 2011 Inspectors: C. Zoia, Operations Engineer - Chief Examiner D. McNeil, Senior Operations Engineer - Examiner R. K. Walton, Senior Operations Engineer - Examiner R. Baker, Operations Engineer - Observer Approved by: Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety 1 Enclosure 1  
Licensee: NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC Facility: Duane Arnold Energy Center Location: Palo, IA Dates: June 26 through July 13, 2011 Inspectors: C. Zoia, Operations Engineer - Chief Examiner D. McNeil, Senior Operations Engineer - Examiner R. K. Walton, Senior Operations Engineer - Examiner R. Baker, Operations Engineer - Observer Approved by: Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure 1


=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
ER 05000331/2011301(DRS); 06/26/2011-07/13/2011; NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC, Duane Arnold Energy Center; Initial License Examination Report. The announced initial operator licensing examination was conducted by regional Nuclear Regulatory Commission examiners in accordance with the guidance of NUREG-1021, AOperator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors,@ Revision 9. Examination Summary: Ten of ten applicants passed all sections of their respective examinations. Six applicants were issued Senior Operator licenses and four applicants were issued Operator licenses.  (Section 4OA5.1).
ER 05000331/2011301(DRS); 06/26/2011-07/13/2011; NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC,
 
Duane Arnold Energy Center; Initial License Examination Report.
 
The announced initial operator licensing examination was conducted by regional Nuclear Regulatory Commission examiners in accordance with the guidance of NUREG-1021, AOperator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors,@ Revision 9.
 
Examination Summary:
Ten of ten applicants passed all sections of their respective examinations. Six applicants were issued Senior Operator licenses and four applicants were issued Operator licenses.


1
(Section 4OA5.1).


=REPORT DETAILS=
=REPORT DETAILS=
Line 50: Line 65:


====a. Examination Scope====
====a. Examination Scope====
The NRC examiners and members of the facility licensee's staff used the guidance prescribed in NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9-Supplement 1, to develop, validate, administer, and grade the written examination and operating test. Members of the facility licensee's staff prepared the outline and developed the written examination and operating test. The NRC examiners validated the proposed examination during the week of June 6, 2011, with the assistance of members of the facility licensee's staff. During the on-site validation week, the examiners audited 30 percent of the license applications for accuracy. The NRC examiners, with the assistance of members of the facility licensee's staff, administered the operating test, consisting of job performance measures and dynamic simulator scenarios, during the period of June 26, 2011 through June 30, 2011. The facility licensee administered the written examination on July 8, 2011.
The NRC examiners and members of the facility licensees staff used the guidance prescribed in NUREG-1021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, Revision 9-Supplement 1, to develop, validate, administer, and grade the written examination and operating test. Members of the facility licensees staff prepared the outline and developed the written examination and operating test. The NRC examiners validated the proposed examination during the week of June 6, 2011, with the assistance of members of the facility licensees staff. During the on-site validation week, the examiners audited 30 percent of the license applications for accuracy. The NRC examiners, with the assistance of members of the facility licensees staff, administered the operating test, consisting of job performance measures and dynamic simulator scenarios, during the period of June 26, 2011 through June 30, 2011. The facility licensee administered the written examination on July 8, 2011.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
(1) Written Examination The NRC examiners determined that the written examination, as proposed by the licensee, was within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination. Less than 20 percent of the proposed examination questions were determined to be unsatisfactory and required modification or replacement. All changes made to the proposed examination, were made in accordance with NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," and documented on Form ES-401-9, "Written Examination Review Worksheet," which will be available in 24 months electronically in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). On July 13, 2011, the licensee submitted documentation noting that there were no post-examination comments for consideration by the NRC examiners when grading the written examination. The final as-administered examination, with comments and answer key (ADAMS Accession Numbers ML11206A563, RO Exam; ML11206A597, SRO Exam; and ML11206A844, Form ES-401-9), will be available in 24 months electronically in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). The NRC examiners graded the written examination on July 14, 2011, and conducted a review of each missed question to determine the accuracy and validity of the examination questions.
: (1) Written Examination The NRC examiners determined that the written examination, as proposed by the licensee, was within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination.
 
Less than 20 percent of the proposed examination questions were determined to be unsatisfactory and required modification or replacement. All changes made to the proposed examination, were made in accordance with NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, and documented on Form ES-401-9, Written Examination Review Worksheet, which will be available in 24 months electronically in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRC's document system (ADAMS).
 
On July 13, 2011, the licensee submitted documentation noting that there were no post-examination comments for consideration by the NRC examiners when grading the written examination. The final as-administered examination, with comments and answer key (ADAMS Accession Numbers ML11206A563, RO Exam; ML11206A597, SRO Exam; and ML11206A844, Form ES-401-9), will be available in 24 months electronically in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRC's document system (ADAMS).
 
The NRC examiners graded the written examination on July 14, 2011, and conducted a review of each missed question to determine the accuracy and validity of the examination questions.
: (2) Operating Test The NRC examiners determined that the operating test, as originally proposed by the licensee, was within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination.


(2) Operating Test The NRC examiners determined that the operating test, as originally proposed by the licensee, was within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination. Changes made to the operating test, documented in a document titled, AOperating Test Comments,@ as well as the final as administered dynamic simulator scenarios and JPMs, are available electronically in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). The NRC examiners completed operating test grading on July 14, 2011. (3) Examination Results Six applicants at the Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) level and four applicants at the Reactor Operator (RO) level were administered written examinations and operating tests. Ten applicants passed all portions of their examinations and were issued their respective operating licenses.
Changes made to the operating test, documented in a document titled, AOperating Test Comments,@ as well as the final as administered dynamic simulator scenarios and JPMs, are available electronically in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRC's document system (ADAMS).
 
The NRC examiners completed operating test grading on July 14, 2011.
: (3) Examination Results Six applicants at the Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) level and four applicants at the Reactor Operator (RO) level were administered written examinations and operating tests. Ten applicants passed all portions of their examinations and were issued their respective operating licenses.


===.2 Examination Security===
===.2 Examination Security===


====a. Scope====
====a. Scope====
The NRC examiners reviewed and observed the licensee's implementation of examination security requirements during the examination validation and administration to assure compliance with 10 CFR 55.49, AIntegrity of Examinations and Tests.@ The examiners used the guidelines provided in NUREG 1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors,@ to determine acceptability of the licensee=s examination security activities.
The NRC examiners reviewed and observed the licensee's implementation of examination security requirements during the examination validation and administration to assure compliance with 10 CFR 55.49, AIntegrity of Examinations and Tests.@ The examiners used the guidelines provided in NUREG 1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors,@ to determine acceptability of the licensee=s examination security activities.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
The chief examiner was notified of two separate potential exam security issues which were determined not to have compromised the examination. The first event occurred during the implementation of a system job performance measure (JPM) in the simulator. An examiner found and removed a post-it note used for equipment flagging after the initiating cue was provided but prior to it being noticed by the applicant. Since the applicant did not see the flagged component, no exam compromise occurred. A similar second event occurred when another licensed operator was performing a system JPM in the simulator. In this case, however, the small post-it note used for flagging the equipment was unnoticed by the applicant or the chief examiner until the applicant was in the process of applying flagging to the same component. As a new flagging post-it note was being placed on the equipment, the previous flagging was observed by the applicant, and the applicant immediately backed away. The chief examiner removed the old flagging, reported the issue to the licensee coordinating the simulator JPMs, and continued with the JPM. Since the applicant was flagging the same equipment when the previous flagging was identified, no exam compromise occurred.
The chief examiner was notified of two separate potential exam security issues which were determined not to have compromised the examination. The first event occurred during the implementation of a system job performance measure (JPM) in the simulator.
 
An examiner found and removed a post-it note used for equipment flagging after the initiating cue was provided but prior to it being noticed by the applicant. Since the applicant did not see the flagged component, no exam compromise occurred.
 
A similar second event occurred when another licensed operator was performing a system JPM in the simulator. In this case, however, the small post-it note used for flagging the equipment was unnoticed by the applicant or the chief examiner until the applicant was in the process of applying flagging to the same component. As a new flagging post-it note was being placed on the equipment, the previous flagging was observed by the applicant, and the applicant immediately backed away. The chief examiner removed the old flagging, reported the issue to the licensee coordinating the simulator JPMs, and continued with the JPM. Since the applicant was flagging the same equipment when the previous flagging was identified, no exam compromise occurred.
 
Both of the above events were entered into the facility licensees corrective action program and actions were initiated to prevent reoccurrence.


Both of the above events were entered into the facility licensee's corrective action program and actions were initiated to prevent reoccurrence.
{{a|4OA6}}
{{a|4OA6}}
==4OA6 Meetings==
==4OA6 Meetings==


===.1 Debrief The chief examiner presented the examination team's preliminary observations on July 1, 2011, to C. Costanzo, Site Vice President, and other members of the Duane Arnold Energy Center Operations and Training Department staff. .2 Exit Meeting The chief examiner conducted an exit meeting on July 14, 2011, with G. Rushworth, Assistant Operations Manager - Training, by telephone.===
===.1 Debrief===
The NRC=s final disposition of the station=s post-examination comments were disclosed and discussed with Mr. Rushworth during the telephone discussion. The examiners asked the licensee whether any of the material used to develop or administer the examination should be considered proprietary. No proprietary or sensitive information was identified during the examination or debrief/exit meetings. ATTACHMENT:
 
The chief examiner presented the examination team's preliminary observations on July 1, 2011, to C. Costanzo, Site Vice President, and other members of the Duane Arnold Energy Center Operations and Training Department staff.
 
===.2 Exit Meeting===
 
The chief examiner conducted an exit meeting on July 14, 2011, with G. Rushworth, Assistant Operations Manager - Training, by telephone. The NRC=s final disposition of the station=s post-examination comments were disclosed and discussed with Mr. Rushworth during the telephone discussion. The examiners asked the licensee whether any of the material used to develop or administer the examination should be considered proprietary. No proprietary or sensitive information was identified during the examination or debrief/exit meetings.
 
ATTACHMENT:  


=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=
=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=


==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT==
==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT==
Licensee  
 
: [[contact::C. Costanzo]], Site Vice President
Licensee
: [[contact::G. Rushworth]], Assistant Operations Manager - Training  
: [[contact::C. Costanzo]], Site Vice President
: [[contact::G. Pry]], Operations Director  
: [[contact::G. Rushworth]], Assistant Operations Manager - Training
: [[contact::S. Catron]], Licensing Manager  
: [[contact::G. Pry]], Operations Director
: [[contact::D. Curtland]], Plant General Manager  
: [[contact::S. Catron]], Licensing Manager
: [[contact::W. Simmons]], Training Manager  
: [[contact::D. Curtland]], Plant General Manager
: [[contact::C. Hansen]], Exam Project Manager  
: [[contact::W. Simmons]], Training Manager
: [[contact::J. Kalamaja]], Assistant Operations Manager  
: [[contact::C. Hansen]], Exam Project Manager
: [[contact::A. Lewis]], Initial License Training Supervisor  
: [[contact::J. Kalamaja]], Assistant Operations Manager
: [[contact::A. Browning]], Licensing  
: [[contact::A. Lewis]], Initial License Training Supervisor
: [[contact::R. Becker]], Operations Instructor  
: [[contact::A. Browning]], Licensing
: [[contact::J. Morris]], Operations Instructor  
: [[contact::R. Becker]], Operations Instructor
: [[contact::G. Fuller]], Operations Instructor  
: [[contact::J. Morris]], Operations Instructor
: [[contact::S. Vick]], Operations Instructor  
: [[contact::G. Fuller]], Operations Instructor
: [[contact::M. Walter]], Operations Instructor  
: [[contact::S. Vick]], Operations Instructor
: [[contact::E. Murray]], Operations Instructor NRC  
: [[contact::M. Walter]], Operations Instructor
: [[contact::L. Haeg]], Senior Resident Inspector  
: [[contact::E. Murray]], Operations Instructor
: [[contact::C. Zoia]], Operations Engineer - Chief Examiner  
NRC
: [[contact::D. McNeil]], Senior Operations Engineer - Examiner  
: [[contact::L. Haeg]], Senior Resident Inspector
: [[contact::R. K. Walton]], Senior Operations Engineer - Examiner  
: [[contact::C. Zoia]], Operations Engineer - Chief Examiner
: [[contact::R. Baker]], Operations Engineer - Examiner  
: [[contact::D. McNeil]], Senior Operations Engineer - Examiner
: [[contact::R. K. Walton]], Senior Operations Engineer - Examiner
: [[contact::R. Baker]], Operations Engineer - Examiner
 
==ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED==
==ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED==
None  
 
None
 
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==
The following is a partial list of documents reviewed during the inspection.
 
: Inclusion on this list does not imply that the NRC inspector reviewed the documents in their entirety, but rather that selected sections or portions of the documents were evaluated as part of the overall inspection effort.
: Inclusion of a document on this list does not imply NRC acceptance of the document or any part of it, unless this is stated in the body of the inspection report.
: Condition Evaluation Report,
: CE 1665983; July 2011
: OTI-101; Simulator Training Practices; Revision 37
: AR 01668206; Error Found on Exam Submittal to NRC; July 2011
: AR 01666135; Revise OTI Training Checklist to Include Flags; July 2011 
: Attachment
==LIST OF ACRONYMS==
: [[USED]] [[]]
: [[ADAMS]] [[Agency-Wide Document Access and Management System]]
: [[DRS]] [[Division of Reactor Safety]]
: [[JPM]] [[Job Performance Measure]]
: [[NRC]] [[U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission]]
RO Reactor Operator SRO Senior Reactor Operator
Enclosure
: [[2 SIMULA]] [[TION FACILITY]]
: [[REPORT]] [[Facility Licensee:  Duane Arnold Energy Center Facility Docket No:  50-331 Operating Tests Administered: June 26 - 30, 2011 The following documents observations made by the]]
: [[NRC]] [[examination team during the initial operator license examination. These observations do not constitute audit or inspection findings and are not, without further verification and review, indicative of non-compliance with]]
: [[10 CFR]] [[55.45(b). These observations do not affect]]
: [[NRC]] [[certification or approval of the simulation facility other than to provide information which may be used in future evaluations. No licensee action is required in response to these observations. During the conduct of the simulator portion of the operating tests, the following items were observed:]]
: [[ITEM]] [[]]
: [[DESCRI]] [[PTIONNone None]]
: [[C.]] [[Costanzo    -2-  In accordance with 10]]
: [[CFR]] [[2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be available electronically for public inspection in the]]
: [[NRC]] [[Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (]]
PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). Sincerely, 
/RA by
: [[B.]] [[Palagi for/  Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-331 License No.]]
: [[DPR]] [[-49  Enclosures: 1. Operator Licensing Examination Report        05000331/2011301(DRS)        w/Attachment:  Supplemental Information 2. Simulation Facility Report cc w/encls: Distribution via ListServ]]
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 16:48, 12 November 2019

Er 05000331-11-301(DRS), on 06/26/2011-07/13/2011, NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC, Duane Arnold Energy Center, Initial License Examination Report
ML11213A276
Person / Time
Site: Duane Arnold NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/28/2011
From: Hironori Peterson
NRC/RGN-II/DRS/OLB
To: Costanzo C
NextEra Energy Duane Arnold
References
ER-11-301
Download: ML11213A276 (11)
v • d • e


Text

uly 28, 2011

SUBJECT:

DUANE ARNOLD ENERGY CENTER NRC INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION REPORT 05000331/2011301(DRS)

Dear Mr. Costanzo:

On July 14, 2011, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed the initial operator licensing examination process for license applicants employed at your Duane Arnold Energy Center (DAEC). The enclosed report documents the results of those examinations.

Preliminary observations noted during the examination process were discussed on July 1, 2011, with you, and other members of your staff. An exit meeting was conducted by telephone on July 14, 2011, between Mr. G. Rushworth, Assistant Operations Manager - Training, of your staff and Mr. C. Zoia, Chief Operator Licensing Examiner, to review the proposed final grading of the written examination for the license applicants. The NRC confirmed the station submitted documentation noting that there were no post-examination comments for consideration during NRC grading of the examination.

The NRC examiners administered an initial license examination operating test during the week of June 26, 2011. The written examination was administered by DAEC training department personnel on July 8, 2011. Six Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and four Reactor Operator (RO)

applicants were administered license examinations. The results of the examinations were finalized on July 14, 2011. All ten applicants passed all sections of their respective examinations. Six applicants were issued Senior Operator licenses and four were issued Operator Licenses.

The written examination and other related written examination documentation will be withheld from public disclosure for 24 months at the request of Mr. G. Rushworth. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA by B. Palagi for/

Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-331 License No. DPR-49

Enclosures:

1. Operator Licensing Examination Report 05000331/2011301(DRS)

w/Attachment: Supplemental Information 2. Simulation Facility Report

REGION III==

License No: DPR-49 Report No: 05000331/2009301(DRS)

Licensee: NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC Facility: Duane Arnold Energy Center Location: Palo, IA Dates: June 26 through July 13, 2011 Inspectors: C. Zoia, Operations Engineer - Chief Examiner D. McNeil, Senior Operations Engineer - Examiner R. K. Walton, Senior Operations Engineer - Examiner R. Baker, Operations Engineer - Observer Approved by: Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure 1

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

ER 05000331/2011301(DRS); 06/26/2011-07/13/2011; NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC,

Duane Arnold Energy Center; Initial License Examination Report.

The announced initial operator licensing examination was conducted by regional Nuclear Regulatory Commission examiners in accordance with the guidance of NUREG-1021, AOperator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors,@ Revision 9.

Examination Summary:

Ten of ten applicants passed all sections of their respective examinations. Six applicants were issued Senior Operator licenses and four applicants were issued Operator licenses.

(Section 4OA5.1).

REPORT DETAILS

4OA5 Other

.1 Initial Licensing Examinations

a. Examination Scope

The NRC examiners and members of the facility licensees staff used the guidance prescribed in NUREG-1021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, Revision 9-Supplement 1, to develop, validate, administer, and grade the written examination and operating test. Members of the facility licensees staff prepared the outline and developed the written examination and operating test. The NRC examiners validated the proposed examination during the week of June 6, 2011, with the assistance of members of the facility licensees staff. During the on-site validation week, the examiners audited 30 percent of the license applications for accuracy. The NRC examiners, with the assistance of members of the facility licensees staff, administered the operating test, consisting of job performance measures and dynamic simulator scenarios, during the period of June 26, 2011 through June 30, 2011. The facility licensee administered the written examination on July 8, 2011.

b. Findings

(1) Written Examination The NRC examiners determined that the written examination, as proposed by the licensee, was within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination.

Less than 20 percent of the proposed examination questions were determined to be unsatisfactory and required modification or replacement. All changes made to the proposed examination, were made in accordance with NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, and documented on Form ES-401-9, Written Examination Review Worksheet, which will be available in 24 months electronically in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRC's document system (ADAMS).

On July 13, 2011, the licensee submitted documentation noting that there were no post-examination comments for consideration by the NRC examiners when grading the written examination. The final as-administered examination, with comments and answer key (ADAMS Accession Numbers ML11206A563, RO Exam; ML11206A597, SRO Exam; and ML11206A844, Form ES-401-9), will be available in 24 months electronically in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRC's document system (ADAMS).

The NRC examiners graded the written examination on July 14, 2011, and conducted a review of each missed question to determine the accuracy and validity of the examination questions.

(2) Operating Test The NRC examiners determined that the operating test, as originally proposed by the licensee, was within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination.

Changes made to the operating test, documented in a document titled, AOperating Test Comments,@ as well as the final as administered dynamic simulator scenarios and JPMs, are available electronically in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRC's document system (ADAMS).

The NRC examiners completed operating test grading on July 14, 2011.

(3) Examination Results Six applicants at the Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) level and four applicants at the Reactor Operator (RO) level were administered written examinations and operating tests. Ten applicants passed all portions of their examinations and were issued their respective operating licenses.

.2 Examination Security

a. Scope

The NRC examiners reviewed and observed the licensee's implementation of examination security requirements during the examination validation and administration to assure compliance with 10 CFR 55.49, AIntegrity of Examinations and Tests.@ The examiners used the guidelines provided in NUREG 1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors,@ to determine acceptability of the licensee=s examination security activities.

b. Findings

The chief examiner was notified of two separate potential exam security issues which were determined not to have compromised the examination. The first event occurred during the implementation of a system job performance measure (JPM) in the simulator.

An examiner found and removed a post-it note used for equipment flagging after the initiating cue was provided but prior to it being noticed by the applicant. Since the applicant did not see the flagged component, no exam compromise occurred.

A similar second event occurred when another licensed operator was performing a system JPM in the simulator. In this case, however, the small post-it note used for flagging the equipment was unnoticed by the applicant or the chief examiner until the applicant was in the process of applying flagging to the same component. As a new flagging post-it note was being placed on the equipment, the previous flagging was observed by the applicant, and the applicant immediately backed away. The chief examiner removed the old flagging, reported the issue to the licensee coordinating the simulator JPMs, and continued with the JPM. Since the applicant was flagging the same equipment when the previous flagging was identified, no exam compromise occurred.

Both of the above events were entered into the facility licensees corrective action program and actions were initiated to prevent reoccurrence.

4OA6 Meetings

.1 Debrief

The chief examiner presented the examination team's preliminary observations on July 1, 2011, to C. Costanzo, Site Vice President, and other members of the Duane Arnold Energy Center Operations and Training Department staff.

.2 Exit Meeting

The chief examiner conducted an exit meeting on July 14, 2011, with G. Rushworth, Assistant Operations Manager - Training, by telephone. The NRC=s final disposition of the station=s post-examination comments were disclosed and discussed with Mr. Rushworth during the telephone discussion. The examiners asked the licensee whether any of the material used to develop or administer the examination should be considered proprietary. No proprietary or sensitive information was identified during the examination or debrief/exit meetings.

ATTACHMENT:

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee

C. Costanzo, Site Vice President
G. Rushworth, Assistant Operations Manager - Training
G. Pry, Operations Director
S. Catron, Licensing Manager
D. Curtland, Plant General Manager
W. Simmons, Training Manager
C. Hansen, Exam Project Manager
J. Kalamaja, Assistant Operations Manager
A. Lewis, Initial License Training Supervisor
A. Browning, Licensing
R. Becker, Operations Instructor
J. Morris, Operations Instructor
G. Fuller, Operations Instructor
S. Vick, Operations Instructor
M. Walter, Operations Instructor
E. Murray, Operations Instructor

NRC

L. Haeg, Senior Resident Inspector
C. Zoia, Operations Engineer - Chief Examiner
D. McNeil, Senior Operations Engineer - Examiner
R. K. Walton, Senior Operations Engineer - Examiner
R. Baker, Operations Engineer - Examiner

ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED

None

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000331/2011301&oldid=2114760"