ML040340118

Engineering Report ER-03-005, Revision 0, Sgla Characterization (1) Characterization of D.C. Cook Unit 1 Steam Generator Lower Assemblies

ML040340118
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	10/31/2003
From:	Whittaker M, Witt C Duratek
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
ER-03-005, Rev 0
Download: ML040340118 (23)

Text

ATTACHMENT 5 SGLA CHARACTERIZATION (1) Characterization of D.C. Cook Unit I Steam Generator Lower Assemblies ER-03-006, Rev 0 I

DURATEK ENGINEERING REPORT ER-03-006 Revision 0 Approvals Page Characterization of D.C. Cook Unit 1 Steam Generator Lower Assemblies Prepared by:

Reviewed by:

Mar Whittaker. Sr.Analyst Charles Witt, Principal Engineer Date Date

'. " t'..T -il "I'M

.. 1. -'. ; 1.'! "4.
:1.,

j t'

'- --, r-

'c' -

--" '-,", "'.. ",

-j -"!.II a 4, a

I a

Q L-'-3 3 ; a 6 1-0,,

"' 5 IJ ' f

TABLE OF CONTENTS Pa-ge No.

1.

SUMMARY

3

2.

PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION OF STEAM GENERATORS..................................... 3

3.

RADIOACTIVE SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS............................................

3

4.

CHARACTERIZATION ASSUMPTIONS............................................

4

5.

SOURCE CHARACTERIZATION...........................

.5 5.1 MICROSHIELD CALCULATIONS..........................

6 5.2 SOURCE DISTRIBUTION...........................

7

6.

WASTE CLASSIFICATION AND DOT SUBTYPING

.8

7.

REFERENCES.10 APPENDIX A AEP SUPPLIED INFORMATION 1

APPENDIX B MICROSHIELD MODELS AND OUTPUT

.12 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Table 3.1 - Radionuclide Distribution.....................................................................................................3 Table 5-1 Co-60 Content in Straight Tube Section.............................................................................7 Table 5-2 SGLA Co-60 Content Results................................................................................................7 Table 6-1 DOT Subtyping of D.C. Cook SGLA 12..............................................................................9 Table 6-2 Disposal Classification of D.C. Cook SGLA 12...............................................................9 Figure 5-1 Microshield Model Representation of Steam Generator Source Region.........6 ER-03-006 Rev. 0 Page 2

1.

Summary This report presents the analyses performed in support of the source characterization and classification of four D.C. Cook Unit I Steam Generator Lower Assemblies (SGLAs) for American Electric Power, the owner and operator of the D.C. Cook plant.

The radionuclide content of the SGLAs was determined based on isotopic and dose rate information to demonstrate compliance with applicable criteria for transportation and disposal.

The activity in each SGLA will be re-evaluated after removal of the SGLAs from the storage facility and prior to shipment for disposal. If there is a significant change in the activity from that estimated in this report, a revised charaterization will be prepared.

2.

Physical Description of Steam Generators The steam generators at D.C. Cook Unit I are Westinghouse Model 51, identical to those previously transported for disposal.

The basic physical dimensions and design criteria of the SGLAs are taken from the characterization report for the previously disposed SGLAs, ER-98-009 [II].

3.

Radioactive Source Characteristics A contamination sample (smear) was taken from the interior of one of the SGLAs on Feb. 5, 2000. The sample was analyzed for radionuclide content. The analysis report is included in Appendix A. The activity was decayed to the date of the radiation survey of the SGLAs, Sept. 12, 2003. The decayed radionuclide content was used as the isotopic distribution of radioactivity within the SGLAs. For two pair of radionuclides, Cm-243/244 and Pu-2391240, a single activity is reported. The distribution was normalized to Co-60 and applied to the Co-60 activity determined from the dose to curie conversion factor from the shielding model. The sample results and the normalized distribution are provided in Table 3-1.

Table 3.1 - Radionuclide Distribution Radionuclide Am-241 Cm-2431244 Co-60 Fe-55 Mn-54 Ni-63 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Measured Activity Decayed Activity

( ci)

( ci) 2.OOE-05 1.99E-05 1.80E-05 1.66E-05 1.51 E-01 9.84E-02 4.70E-02 2.06E-02 2.78E-03 1.98E-04 1.1OE-02 1.08E-02 1.30E-05 1.30E-05 1.80E-03 1.54E-03 Normalized Distribution 2.02E-04 1.69E-04 I.OOE+00 2.09E-01 2.02E-03 1.09E-01 1.32E-04 1.56E-02 ER-03-006 Rev. 0 Page 3

Measured Activity Decayed Activity Normalized Radionuclide

( Ci)

(Ci)

Distribution Tc-99 3.50E-04 3.50E-04 3.56E-03 External radiation surveys were taken on the SGLAs on Sept. 12, 2003. This survey information is included in Appendix A. The average value over the straight tube region of the SGLA was determined. These average values are used in calculating the surface area contamination on the. straight tubes.

The characterization will be re-evaluated based on dose rate profiles taken on the SGLAs on removal from the storage facility. However, these dose rates are not expected to change significantly from those measured in September, 2003.

4.

Characterization Assumptions Several assumptions are made in the course of performing the characterization analyses of the steam generators. These assumptions are utilized to simplify the analysis, while maintaining accuracy in the overall result.

1. Secondary-side steam generator surfaces contain no activity.

Since the secondary side of the steam generator is exposed only to secondary side water, it is assumed that the secondary side contains only negligible quantities of radioactive contamination. This assumption has been used for previous steam generator characterizations.

2. Residual water in plugged tubes contains no activity.

The plugged tubes in the steam generator could contain relatively small amounts of water that seeps into the tubes during operation of the generators. It is assumed that this water contains negligible quantities of radioactive material, and is not considered in this characterization.

3. Uniformity in distribution of primary-side surface contaminates.

Two EPRI reports [2, 3] address the issue of steam generator primary side surface contamination. These reports indicate that, while the straight tube sections with the SGLAs exhibit fairly uniform surface contamination, the U-tube and tube sheet sections of the heat exchanger tubes contain higher surface contamination values than that of the straight tube sections.

ER-03-006 Rev. 0 Page 4

Additional uncertainty exists concerning the relative surface contamination levels between the tubes and the channel head surfaces, including the tube sheet, divider plate, and bowl itself. The studies indicate that the differing materials used for the tubes versus the channel head components, combined with other factors, could result in higher surface contamination values in the channel head region.

To address these issues, this analysis assumes that all surfaces other than the straight tube sections contain surface contamination levels per unit area twice that of the straight tube sections. This factor of two is addressed specifically in the reference [2] study for the various tube sections. It is reasonable to apply this assumption to the channel head sections as well, as they are of a similar geometry and represent only a minimal fraction of the total surface area, and thus only a small portion of the total activity in the SGLAs.

5.

Source Characterization Employing the information from the previous sections, the radionuclide content of the SGLAs can be determined from the measured external SGLA dose rates and the SGLA design parameters.

The straight tube section of the lower barrel of the SGLA is modeled with the Microshield [4] point kernel shielding code, using a I curie Co-60 source term. The shortest straight tube length is approximately 357 inches, not including the 21 inch length of tube in the tube sheet. The diameter and thickness of the radial source and shielding regions of the model are taken from ER-98-009 [I1].

ER-03-006 Rev. 0 Page 5

Figure 5-1 Microshield Model Representation of Steam Generator Source Region 356.75" Effective Straight Tube Length Lower Barrel - 2.82" The source region is modeled as nickel alloy, Alloy 600, at a density of 0.646 g/cc to represent the fraction of the source region cross-section occupied by the tubes. The void regions are modeled as air, and the wrapper and lower barrel are modeled as A 533 steel. The densities are taken from ER-98-009[1 I].

5.1 Microshield Calculations Analyses are performed with Microshield using the model previously described with the I Ci Co-60 source term. The calculation produces an exposure rate, 1 foot from the.

surface, of 1.181'mR/hr; thus, the dose-to-curie factor is 1.181 mR/hr/Ci. The average exposure rates are then divided by the dose-to-curie factor to determine the number of curies of Co-60 in the straight tube section of the SGLA on the date of the survey, 9/12103. This activity is then divided by the surface area of the straight tubes (3.80E+07 cm2) to give the activity per unit area. The results of these calculations are presented in Table 5-1.

ER-03-006 Rev. 0 Page 6

Table 5-1 Co-60 Content in Straight Tube Section SGLA SGLA SGLA SGLA 11 12 13 14 Average 30 cm Exposure Rate (mR/hr) 20.4 26.9 24.2 24.3 Activity in Straight Tube Section (Ci Co-60) 17.31 22.81

.20.48 20.53 Areal Activity (jiCi/cm2Co-60) 0.456 0.601 0.539 0.541 5.2 Source Distribution The straight tube source contamination calculated in Section 5.1 is utilized to determine the contamination on the U-tube and tube sheet sections of the heat exchanger tubes, as well as the channel head components.

The straight tube contamination levels, shown in Table 5-1, are multiplied by the surface area of the other components and the factor of two discussed in Section 4. The resulting Co-60 surface contamination levels on the remaining primary side surfaces of the steam generator are 0.912, 1.201, 1.079, and 1.082 pCi/cm2, respectively. These surface contamination levels are used to calculate the Co-60 curies in each steam generator as shown in Table 5-2.

Table 5-2 SGLA Co-60 Content Results (asof 12 September 2003).

Surface Area (cm2)

SGLA II Co-60 Activity (Ci)

SGLA 12 Co-60 Activity (Ci)

SGLA 13 Co-60 Activity (Ci)

SGLA 14 Co-60 Activity (Ci)

Contaminated Surface Areas Straight Tube Surface Area 3.80E+07 17.31 22.81 20.48 20.53 Tubes in Tube Sheet 2.25E+06 2.04 2.69 2.41 2.42 U-Tube Section Surface 5.19E+06 4.73 6.23 5.59 5.61 Area Channel Head 1.60E+05 0.15 0.19 0.17 0.17 Tube Sheet 5.93E+04 0.05 0.07 0.06 0.06 Divider Plate 8.OOE+04 0.07 0.10 0.09 0.09 Total 24.34 32.08 28.81 28.88 The normalized distribution presented in Table 3.1 is used to determine the full isotopic distribution of activity in each SGLA, i.e., each isotope distribution factor is multiplied by the Co-60 content from Table 5-2. The activity is decayed to the estimated date of shipment, May 15, 2004. The resulting activity is shown in Table 5-3.

ER-03-006 Rev. 0 Page 7

Table 5-3 SGLA Activity.

SGLA#11 SGLA#12 SGLA#13 SGLA#14 9/12/03 5/15/04 9/12/03 5/15/04 9/12/03 5/15/04 9/12/03 5/15/04 Isotopic (ci)

(Ci)

(Ci)

(Ci)

(Ci)

(Ci)

(Ci)

(Ci)

Am-241 0.005 0.005 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 Cm-243 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 Co-60 24.341 22.277 32.083 29.362 28.808 26.364 28.882 26.433 Fe-55 5.085 4.285 6.703 5.648 6.018 5.072 6.034 5.085 Mn-54 0.049 0.028 0.065 0.037 0.058 0.034 0.058 0.034 Ni-63 2.661 2.648 3.507 3.491 3.149 3.134 3.157 3.142 Pu-239 0.003 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 Pu-241 0.381 0.369 0.502 0.486 0.451 0.436 0.452 0.437 c-99 0.087 0.087 0.114 0.114 0.102 0.102 0.103 0.103 otal 32.616 29.706 42.989 39.154 38.601 35.157 38.700 35.248

6.

Waste Classification and DOT Subtyping The shipping and disposal classifications can be performed for the SGLAs based on the calculated radionuclide content in accordance with regulatory requirements [5, 6, 7, and 8]. This information is important to demonstrate that the SGLAs meet applicable requirements for transportation and disposal.

The DOT subtyping for the highest activity SGLA, SGLA #12, is shown in Table 6-1. As shown, the SGLA #12 contains a greater-than-Type-A quantity of radioactive material, with a cumulative A2 value of 7.3. The average Co-60 surface contamination levels, shown in Table 5-2, are much less than the SCO-Il limit of 20 pCi/cm2. Since Co-60 is over 70% of the total activity, the overall average contamination levels are also much less than the limits. However, uncertainty in the distribution of activity over all surfaces in the SGLA results in an uncertainty that all areas are less than the SCO-l1 limit. As such, an exemption from SCO-I limits and packaging requirements will be requested from the DOT as suggested in Reference 9.

The total amount of fissile material in all four SGLAs is 0.26g which is less than 15g; therefore, the shipment qualifies as fissile excepted.

ER-03-006 Rev. 0 Page 8

Table 6-1 DOT Subtyping of D.C. Cook SGLA 12 Isotope Curies A2 Value A2 Fraction Am-241 6.48E-03 0.00541 1.198 Cm-243 5.33E-03 0.00811 0.658 Co-60 2.94E+01 10.8 2.719 Fe-55 5.65E+00 1080 0.005 Mn-54 3.75E-02 27 0.001 Ni-63 3.49E+00 811 0.004 Pu-239 4.24E-03 0.00541 0.783 Pu-241 4.86E-01 0.27 1.799 Tc-99 1.14E-01 24.3 0.005 TOTAL 3.92E+01 7.173 The disposal classification of SGLA #12, which has the largest total activity, is shown in Table 6-2. The disposal volume is 104.52 m3 and the mass is 1.266E+08g. This classification lists the required nuclides from 10 CFR 61, and demonstrates that the Table I and Table 2 isotopes meet the requirements for classification of the SGLAs as Class A waste.

Table 6-2 Disposal Classification of D.C. Cook SGLA 12 nuclides Activity SpA, nCVg SpA, CIImA3 Part 61 fraction 14C O.OOE+O O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 14C O.OOE+O O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 59 Ni O.OOE+O O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 94 Nb O.OOE+O0 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 99Tc 1.14E-01 1.09E-03 3.64E-04 1291 I

.OOE+00 0.002+00 0.002+00 TRU 1.61E-02 1.27E-01 1.27E-03 241Pu 4.86E-01 3.84E+00 1.10E-03 242 Cm O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 sum of fractions 2.73E-03 Table I Eval:

ClassA Table 2 I....

5.69E+00 5.44E-02 Class A 3H O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 Class A 60o 2.94E+01 2.81E-01 Class A 63Ni 349E+00 3.34E-02 Class A 63Ni act OOOE+

OO O.OOE+00 Class A 9OSr O.OOE+

OO 0.00E+00 Class A 137Cs O.OE+00,\\,..~

O.OOE+00 Class A TOTAL:

3.92E+01 3.70E-01,

, I-ER-03-006 Rev. 0 Page 9

7.

References

[1]

CNS Procedure EN-AD-010, "Procedure for Waste Characterization of Non-Irradiated Components or Items."

(2]

EPRI-NP-2968, Primary-Side Deposits on PWR Steam Generator Tubes,"

Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, March 1983.

[3]

EPRI-NP-3107, "Gamma-Ray Exposure Rate Distribution in a Steam Generator,"

Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, May 1983.

[4]

Grove Engineering, Inc. "Microshield Computer Code," Version 5.01.

[5]

NRC, "Low-Level Waste Licensing Branch Technical Position on Radioactive Waste Classification," (May 1983).

[6]

Code of Federal Regulations, IOCFR Part 61 and IOCFR Part 71.

[7]

Code of Federal Regulations, 49CFR Parts 100 to 177.

[8]

DHEC License CNSI-SC-097, (Bamwell Site Criteria).

[9]

NRC Generic Letter 96-07, Interim Guidance on Transportation of Steam Generators," U.S. NRC Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, December 5,1996.

[10] NUREG-1608, "Categorizing and Transporting Low Specific Activity Materials and Surface Contaminated Objects," U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, July 1998

[11] Duratek Engineering Report,ER-98-009, Rev.1, Preliminary Waste Characterization of D.C. Cook Steam Generator Lower Assemblies "I

ER-03-006 Rev. 0 Page 10

APPENDIX A AEP SUPPLIED INFORMATION (7 PAGES)

ER-03-006 Rev. 0 Page

coo-Too-00 t.

i

-aep 1

U lC:

J4 noo zr.orj

[

' RADIOLOGICAL AREA STATUS SLET AREA DESCRIPTION S/G MAUSOLUM MP 27 AREA CLASSIFICATION BNARKE METER TYPE/f PADTIO o

c.!

KAc

-x-r 129z 6d HHEXTREME HIGH.RdTI c2RMNIIARTX~rlYITY N

• DcNOeCS CCTACT /30 CM.

2 REASON FOR SURVEY DosE RATES IN A1R/14R T WIS LKL CONTAMINATION IN DPM/IOCUl

(.8lL,2a~d¢l4w SI4",Lv SURVEYED BY/h./w lTIME 123o DATE'// c I-Is.

S R

EY D

Y411,s-A4#-f RWP USED:O(-Id~~!

-1a-

§ c; 0od RE/VIEWED BY DATE

• P USED:.

a A4.

S

.i E

.VAI

'*A, it%4 L.

.1 4 5 9&C< 2

-P tj

.vSC s~o.

S2 REMARKS I O.-

\\/

aV a-v 8

/

i

~~~~

o

/

2-L

/

Vil IAWIIJAJ I I

A I I Oov s "av.,4 ti. f I

I

-J.j bep i*

Ud e:..J:p bOo atoru RADIOLOGICAL AREA STATUS SHEET ACA D'-SCRiPTIOr S/G MAUSOLCUM M? §

-A CLASSIFICATl1fN MRsjAR5 Sg L

1ETERTYP-/I1O.

-~RADIATION i

~SC6 i 4 0 HIGH RADIATION A

Cc.

e.,,,

If K 1

O 1

EXTREM2 HIGH.RPADATMfl

. I i

TAMI AM

=J.b~~

P~&A R

RORN VEY oss mamrs I4 MNaTS CCNACT /30 CM.

REASON FOR SURVEY COS£ IN WA IHR AT WST UV-l CTAMflAT1ICN IN DLlFrOC:A eIkfrCktE4 C

orr A

5vrXJ£ SUJRVEYED BY V'A ITIMEII7 DA Io 3

RWP USED:

BA.O JL RE*IEWE s

r-12.

2 22.

3.1

's-3.S 1.1

-a 1

'20

=

1S,

,L.

1-9 2s

-L 5-ISr vur 1II1A1 lu R

KARS tD/

/

S~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

m \\

/

i a

/~~~~~~~~

G I/

o~~~~~~~

\\

/

U~

/

a

/

@~~

G

/-/\\

G/

0L ic

p.

b, mo bort l

v 4

D bep I

U 3r RADIOLOGICAL AREA STATUS AREA DESCRIPTi0gi S/G MAUSOLEUM

! ARSA CLASSIF1OATIO?1 R9AI<SR tE3 s/

c-,

HIGHE NAIG4RDIM,~~+

~.~-

~.

EXRERAMHIGHATAT, o=

IR RM

,SL

• VIc CoxyS CTACT/ 30CM.

REASOm FOR SURV/Y DOsE wlrZS M4 M/1iR AT AIST LEVE C

6^nen~cr~g~z*,~fi~a <irJei SURVEYED BYi

!p.

TIME RWP USED:

03.I a

23$

REVIEWED BY

.N+5 io '-

SHET Z.wa P

271

!l£EERTYP./j2 t-ZZC!

Qs -

3Li rflTA TI CN IN D

/ CoG' w,-:o DATE Oq-LL-c's DAT E 9 Ie

• t.v COtflANlNAIQ/-.

RqM ARKSc

-S

/

7\\

/

S

/

-~~

IC

/

\\

o

/

-I 1-I 7-7-1

-Z3 2-,3 f

'30'"

33.'f 3

33 '

3 Z7 '

E a_

i-I I 1lZ

AJ q.,

U

~j k.

LJ 8

=C..

0 ~-

ro c

00 F.

t

-A=r

'6 j

%J j A -

r 3

- RADIOLOGICAI AREA STATUS SHET ET AREA DSCRIPTI S/G MAUSOLCUM M5 271 1

CLASSIFICATIONl

-METARKS sE ER TYP/ri O.

L.

a-so I"T O IGH PADIATIOM uIP t

O

-q i-..t-

.- C P.

i J-ti.

r EXTREMF HIGH.£ADATM

,r

! PhRE~iER ACTIT r-5 MED 4 X CEN0TcS CCJTACT /

Cm.

REASON1 FOR SURgVEY RSATEI Yl a/R AT WAIST E

CCNTAMlINATICN IN D / 0CS Qh Ar cte.-w~~-

Stvr'Je 1 zSURVEYED BYI TIME0 A

a RWP USED:

W ji

-RVIEWED BY DATE vrukt4-A &I IN A'r%-j..

1 r:

S m it..-,

L

!q +56 w

-tf 7L.

I!

~2o

,I'.

2 2

II 2

!LL4d.uJ PC -I-'

L,A1I ->.

G 19 12LI 2Z1.

mI 1w~

IS /-,3 1

RLM ARIKS A

/

/

a

/

S~

S

/\\

U

/\\

o~~

12

/4

-Z 2

L

• 41 I

C 0 T 00 C..

0O tIDD~r r -.

,-,f l

U l:

Jtp K

RADIOLOGICAL AREA STATUS AREA DCRIPTIoN S/G MiAUSOLCUM AREA CLASSIFICATIONi

-RMARKS 1

PADIATIONI HIGH RIAT ecION CL ',&

w EXTIRE HIGH.RADIATMO1 NATRMIAtTGHi T

,s^-i P

to>F r.

E z IRBORME R

iVITY N:s w7mp*

cMr=s cC-r

/ 30 CM.

REASO FOR SURlEY ccst Rrs w

R/p R Ar WAIST i-va c

SURVEYED BY-MCI.AA; TIMEo jRWP USED:

RE VIEWED BY e--

~WII

.24 6

1 '

• )

Lii.

4

.c

• 3 "o i P..

1e.

'ZS 5

'Z5 15 1C

-3 SHEET vIio.

T271 METER TY-P/

7h EX,*- 2'-20 ITAMINATICN IN DJ /cOc.14

^ cDA r

-. z_- -03

=.CDAT E ^ -o-v CONsTAMlN~

K

/_

I' 7

/

S

/\\

S

/\\

Q

/\\

a

/

E

-/\\

()

/

/

/

/

/

J3

TELEDOYN B8ROW EImrE Environmental Services i )

C 0

REPOR7 OF AALYSIS Ce Jul 19 2000 03:18 pm LOGIN L11551 Add~ ~~.- -

.~

-C.~

. -6 i

.$ '..; s

.SV

<+

2 t

v

@ z;

• • • w;>

AX at~~~~~~~~~~~~8 PA TrM LECHENElT L11551 B-1060 CiS 05/01/00 05/31/00 01 INDIAlNA MICIGOAN POWER COMPANY Release At Projec Manager: A.CARICAL O C COOK.NUCLEAR PLANT ONE COOK PLACE I'

BRIDOKXH MI 491OG~~.*,..

~

0 Continued f,.. ez~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I.

aT143393

~

)5$wpe.:

.:.5. ::

s

• -

0 Tr#-33993 F~~~~~

~

~~~~~~~~~~E-SS-4 4.7 *-0.1 2.02 Total uCi 06/02/00 32 1-129 L.T. 4.

a-OS 06/03/00 32 Nl1-63 1.1 +-0.1 E-02 06/09/00 32 SR-90 L.T. 1.

E-05 06/09/00 32 0

TC-9 9 3.5 *-0.7 3-04 06/10/00 32 8e-7 L.T. 3.

E-02 05/31/00 42 K-40 L.T. S.

E-03 05/31/00 42 CR-S1 L.T. B.

3-02 05/31/00 42 0

MN-54*

2.78+-1.29E-03 05/31/00 42l CO-50 L.T. 3.

E-03 05/31/00 42 FE-59 C.T. 2.

8-02 05/31/00 42 CO-oG*

1.51.-0.1E-01 05/31/00 42 2-65 L.?. 4.

E-03 05/31/00 42 N3-94 L.S. 1.

B-03 05/31/00 42 nS-95 L.T. 4.

E-03 OS/31/00 42 r

ZR-95 L.S. 7.

E-03 05/31/00 42 P-RV-103 L.T. s.

E-03 05/31/00 42 RU-106 L.T. 1.

E-02 05/31/00 42 1

AG-llOH L.T. 2.

E-03 05/31/D0 42 3B-124 L.T. 3.

E-03 0/31/00 42 55-125 L.T. 3.

E-03 03/31/00 42 1-131 L.T. 2.

C 01 05/31/00 42 CS-134 L.S. 1.

E-03 05/31/00 42 CS-137 L.r. 1.

E-03 05/31/00 42 C

BA-140 L.T. 1.

1 00 05/31/00 42 LA-140 L.T. 2.

E-01 05/31/00 42 CS-141 L.T. I.

-03 05/31/00 42 CE-144 L.S. S.

E-03 05/31/00 42 RA-226 L.T. 9 C-03 05/31/00 42 TH-228 L..S. 1.

E-03 05/31/00 42 NP-237 L.S. 1.

E-03 05/31/00 42 1J4.24.,<

2.0 *-0.3 e-OS 06/OB/00 62 LbKeif-G bi2-Rihsri 22-

-i;..:

2 *- GE:Lt.'G~fi ied-std....................................

. bi2 e

a l

'A',',

• > 5.

.' ' s. -.8.Y~s

!-!s S 8: *, b-NS We v u ;m; N-0

,.f 11V.,

.
,, :

. ---
,.,,.-.
, " f:,

-.. _k..

,.t -1

."m " mks

.

Ce :V-.,$

, S 1,.,:

, ;

4

 : -_

.;..1.

.1

.1 -

... 4 Copyt I

of I

L TELEDYNE ROWN ENGINEERING Environmental Services C

REPORT OP ANALYSIS Jul 19 2000, 03:18 pm LOGIN L115S1 MR TIM LECHENET L11SS1 B-1060 CAS 05/01/00 05/31/00 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY Release Project Manager: A.CARMICHA£L o C COOK IUCLEAR PLANT ONE COOK PLACE 1'

BRIOGMAN MI 49106 Continued CM-242 L.T. 4. E.07 Toral uCi 06/01/00 62 M

CM-243/244 #

1.0 *-0.1 E-05 06/01/00 62 PU.23/240 i 1.3 *0.3 8-0s 06/05/00 62 PU.241.$

1.0 *-0.3 B-03 06/10/00 62 0

0-238 L.T. 6. E-07 06/10/00 62 C

A.

tamg.0.

Labo ato Director V

List Page of Report C

I.

.j...a-7 st r

• ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

.,,. -s;':;: ri.;

Copy:

I of 3..

• ~~~~~~~~~/I r

APPENDIX B MICROSHIELD MODELS AND OUTPUT (1 PAGE)

ER-03-006 Rev. 0 Page 12

MicroShield v6.00 (6.0-00005)

Page

1 DOS File : dc cook.ms6 Run Date: October 22, 2003 Run Tlime: 11:06:25 AM Duration : 00:00:01 File Re f:,-

Date: -

I ByChed

_L Checked-'

v Case

Title:

DC Cook SGLA

==

Description:==

Characterization model, 1 Cl Co-60 Geometry: 7 - Cylinder Volume - Side Shields Height Radius Source Dimensions 906.145 cm 151.994 cm 29 ft 8.7 In 4 ft 11.8 in

-!_P

1. 1 201.93 cm 6 ft7.5 in Dose Points y

453.0725 cm 14 ft 10.4 In Shield Name Source Shield 1 Shield 2 Shield 3 Shield 4 Transition Air Gap Shields -

Dimenslon 4.01e+06 In3 2.23 In

.38 In 2.23 In 2.82 In Material Alloy 600 Air A 533 Air A 533 Air Air z

0 cm 0.0 In Denslt 0.646 0.00122 7.86 0.00122 7.86 0.00122 0.00122 ZL Source Input Grouping Method : Actual Photon Energies Nuclide curies becquerels WCI/cm 3 Co-60 1.0000e+000 3.7000e+010 1.5206e-002 B2q/cm3 5.6260e+002 Buildup The material reference is : Shield 4 Integration Parameters Radial Circumferential Y Direction (axial) 10 10 20 E~nrgy MeV 0.6938 1.1732 1.3325 Activity photons/sec 6.035e+06 '

3.700e+10 \\

3.700e+10 Fluence Rate MeV/cm 2/sec No BuQdup 9.497e-04 4.195e+01 6.576e+01 Results Fluence Rate MeV/cm2/sec Wlth Blldu2 9.229e-03 2.774e+02 3.948e+02 Exposure Rate mR/hr Nouldup 1.834e-06 7.497e-02 1.141e-01 Exposure Rate

,mR/hr Wlth Buildup 1.782e-05 4.956e-01 6.850e-01 TOTALS:

7.401e+10 1.077e+02 6.722e+02 1.891e-01 1.181e+00

~-

11 A1n-

.n

ATTACHMENT 7 EVALUATION OF RESIDUAL WATER IN PLUGGED TUBES

ATTACHMENT 7 Evaluation of Residual Water in Plugged Tubes The generators are each estimated to conservatively contain between 229 and 360 gallons of water. This estimate was made by a ratio between the number of plugged tubes in the calculations done for the unit 2 disposal project done in 1999 and the number In the unit 1 steam generators. The primary input to determine the amount of waste in each generator is the number of failed tubes that were then plugged. The plugs would prevent the draining on the water from the generator when it Is taken out of service.

A summary of the estimation Is provided in the table below.

Estimate of Gallons of Water in Steam Generator Unit I (Disposal in 2004)

Unit 2 (Disposal in 1999)

Volume of Volume of Steam Entrapped Steam Entrapped Generator Plugged Tube water Generator Plugged Tube water Number Count (gallons)

Number Count (gallons)

SG 11 676 229.06 SG 21 173 58.62 SG 12 436 245.66 SG 22 261 147.06 SG 13 447 360.35 SG 23 265 213.63 SG 14 606 345.83 SG24 252 143.81 Total 1180.90 Total 563.12 I.

"I