ML12159A260

SRM-M120607B - Affirmation Session: I. SECY-12-0009 Final Rule 10 CFR 73.37; Ii. SECY-12-0026 Diablo Canyon Referred Ruling in LBP-11-32; Iii. SECY-12-0058 Combined License Application for North Anna; Iii. SECY-12-0067 Pilgrim Nuclear Power

ML12159A260
Person / Time
Site:	Pilgrim, Diablo Canyon, 05200017
Issue date:	06/07/2012
From:	Annette Vietti-Cook NRC/SECY
To:	Borchardt R, Patrick Moulding NRC/EDO, NRC/OGC
References
M120607B, SECY-12-0009, SECY-12-0026, SECY-12-0058, SECY-12-0067, +reviewedcpp SRM-M120607B
Download: ML12159A260 (5)

Text

IN RESPONSE, PLEASE REFER TO: M120607B June 7, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR: R. W. Borchardt Executive Director for Operations Patrick Moulding, Acting Director Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/

SUBJECT:

STAFF REQUIREMENTS - AFFIRMATION SESSION, 9:25 A.M.,

THURSDAY, JUNE 7, 2012, COMMISSIONERS' CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE)

I. SECY-12-0009 - Final Rule: 10 CFR 73.37, Physical Protection of Irradiated Fuel in Transit (RIN 3150-AI64)

The Commission approved a final rule amending the security requirements for irradiated fuel in transit in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 73, subject to the attached changes. This rule establishes generically applicable security requirements similar to the requirements currently imposed by NRC Order EA-02-109, Issuance of Order for Interim Safeguards and Security Compensatory Measures for the Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel Greater than 100 Grams. This rule also establishes acceptable performance standards and objectives for the protection of spent nuclear fuel shipments from theft, diversion, or radiological sabotage. Additionally, this rule addresses, in part, a 1999 petition for rulemaking from the State of Nevada (PRM-73-10) that requested the NRC strengthen its regulations governing the security of spent nuclear fuel shipments against malevolent acts.

Following incorporation of these changes, the Federal Register notice should be reviewed by the Rulemaking, Directives, and Editing Branch in the Office of Administration and forwarded to the Office of the Secretary for signature and publication.

(EDO) (SECY Suspense: 7/9/12)

The Commission has approved rescinding the Orders for spent nuclear fuel in transit on the effective date of the final rule in accordance with the Rescission Plan for Orders as provided in to SECY-12-0009.

For purposes of consistency, the staff should also revise the footnotes in Appendix M to Part 110 - Categorization of Nuclear Material to reflect the self-protecting standard radiation dose contained in the IAEA standard for physical protection of nuclear material -INFCIRC/225/Rev. 5, during a future revision to the regulation.

II. SECY-12-0026 - Pacific Gas and Electric Company (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2), Referred Ruling in LBP-11-32 (Nov. 18, 2011); San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peaces Petiton for Partial Interlocutory Review of LBP-11-32 (Dec. 5, 2011)

The Commission (with Chairman Jaczko concurring in part and dissenting in part) approved a Memorandum and Order responding to both the Licensing Boards referral of a portion of its decision that rejected a proposed new contention filed by the San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace, as well as to a petition for interlocutory review of the remaining portion of the Boards decision. The Memorandum and Order declines review of the Boards referred ruling and denies the petition for interlocutory review without prejudice.

(Subsequently, on June 7, 2012, the Secretary signed the Memorandum and Order.)

III. SECY-12-0058 - Virginia Electric and Power Company d/b/a Dominion Virginia Power and Old Dominion Electric Cooperative (Combined License Application for North Anna Unit 3); Dominion's Petition for Review of LBP-11-22 The Commission approved a Memorandum and Order taking review of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards order denying Virginia Electric and Power Companys (Dominions) motion to terminate the contested proceeding on its combined license application for the North Anna Unit

3. The Memorandum and Order reverses the Boards decision in LBP-11-22 to keep the adjudicatory record open and to retain jurisdiction, and remands the case to the Board for further proceedings.

(Subsequently, on June 7, 2012, the Secretary signed the Memorandum and Order.)

IV. SECY-12-0067 - Entergy Nuclear Generation Co. and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

(Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station), Docket No. 50-293-LR The Commission1 (with Chairman Jaczko dissenting) approved a Memorandum and Order responding to a petition for review by Pilgrim Watch of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards decision in LBP-12-1 to deny its request for hearing on a new contention based on the Fukushima Dai-ichi accident. The Memorandum and Order denies Pilgrim Watchs petition for review.

(Subsequently, on June 7, 2012, the Secretary signed the Memorandum and Order.)

Attachment:

Changes to the Final Rule in SECY-12-0009 1

Commissioner Apostolakis did not participate in this matter.

cc: Chairman Jaczko Commissioner Svinicki Commissioner Apostolakis Commissioner Magwood Commissioner Ostendorff EDO OGC CFO OCAA OCA OIG OPA Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail)

PDR

Attachment Changes to the Final Rule in SECY-12-0009 The statements of consideration and guidance document should be revised to explain that the clarifications to the definition of radiological sabotage, as that definition pertains to the protection of spent fuel during transportation, do not change the level of security required during spent fuel shipments and these documents should explain that the clarifications should not be construed as a change to the definition of sabotage as it more broadly applies to other provisions of 10 CFR Part 73.

Further, the statements of consideration should clarify that the purpose of the clarification is to convey that if the current definition of sabotage and the requirements for spent fuel transportation are followed, economic consequences and the social disruption that might result from sabotage are likely to be minimized. Additionally, the following specific revisions should be made to the statements of consideration.

1. Federal Register Notice (FRN) page 14, line 19, revise to read: ..1 Sv Gray (100 rems rad) per hour

2. FRN page 8, line 21, revise to read: storage incidental to transport

3. FRN page 13, line 9, revise to read: Controlled Nuclear Information (UCNI) or Official Use Only (OUO)

4. FRN page 17, line 15, revise to read: SNF shipments which that are

5. FRN page 19, revise the 2nd sentence to read: In the proposed rule, tThe NRC determined that the existing definition already encompasses action of the type described by the petitioner does not need to be revised.

6. FRN page 19, revise the 4th sentence to read: The NRC proposed addressinged this petition request by clarifying the definition of radiological sabotage in NUREG-0561, which is the associated regulatory guidance.

7. FRN page 21, lines 19-21, revise to read: The RAMTASC indicated that specific routing requirements that minimize shipments through populated areas could require lead to shipments to being transported

8. FRN page 22, line 2, revise to read: agreed that each of the several routing

9. FRN page 27, line 10, add a period to the end of the sentence.

10. FRN page 27, lines 13-14, revise to read: requires that the licensees physical protection plan system to include

11. FRN page 41, line 1, revise to read: Nuclear Infrastructure Council (NIC)

12. FRN page 42, revise Response to Comment 2 to read: The NRC agrees with this comment and notes that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) standard for physical protection of nuclear material, INFCIRC 225/rev. 5, specifies a radiation level

in units of Gray/hr (rad/hr) in applying the self-protecting standard. In order to avoid confusion and to maintain consistency with DOT labeling guidelines for radioactive material the IAEA, all references to the self-protecting standard will use Gray (rad) as the units. Additionally, the phrase 0.91 meters (3 feet) has been changed to 1 meter (3.3 feet). In addition, based on 49 CFR 173.403, Definitions, this change will conform to the units used in the definition of transport index (TI), which is a very similar concept. \

13. FRN page 43, line 6, add a comma after revisions,

14. FRN page 58, line 13, revise to read: this issue is being was addressed

15. FRN page 58, lines 15-16, revise to read: which was published as a proposed rule on December 8, 2010 (75 FR 75641) approved by the Commission on January 30, 2012.

16. FRN page 87, line 21, revise to read: With regards to

17. FRN page 87, line 22, revise to read: issue is being was addressed

18. FRN page 88, lines 1-2, revise to read: which was published as a proposed rule for public comment on December 8, 2010 (75 FR 75641) approved by the Commission on January 30, 2012.

19. FRN page 107, line 20, revise to read: requires licensees to

20. FRN page 120, line 6, revise to read: in excess of 1 GySv (100 rad rems) per hour

21. FRN page 125, lines 21-22, revise to read: notified, each Tribal official or to the Tribal officials designee previously notified, and