ML17250A328: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:DOCKETEDUSHRC80oUNITEDSTATESOFAMERICAJUN21980'UCLEARREGULATORYCOMMISSIONOfficeoftheSecretaryDocketing8ServiceBranchBEFORETHEATOMICSAFETYANDLICENSINGBOARDIntheNatterofROCHESTERGASANDELECTRICCORPORATION,(R;E.GinnaNuclearPower.Plant,UnitNo.1)))))DocketNo.50-244)))'ICENSEE'SRESPONSETOREQUESTFORSTATUSREPORTONPROCEEDINGByOrderdatedApril29,1980,theBoardorderedeachofthepartiestosubmitareportonthestatusofthecaptione'dproceeding.RochesterGasandElectricCorporation("Licensee")repliesasfollows:1.OnAugust15,1972,Licenseefiledanapplica-tiondatedAugust9,1972,entitled"ApplicationtoConvertProvisionalOperatingLicensetoFull-TermOperatingLicenseOrAlternativelyToExtendtheTerminationDateoftheProvisionalOperatingLic'ense"("Application")fortheR.E.GinnaNuclearPowerPlant,UnitNo.1.FollowingpublicnoticedatedNovember22,1972,petitionstointervenePwerefiledby:theStateofNewYork,asaninterestedstate,onJanuary5,1973;theMonroeCountyConservationCouncilonJanuary5,1973;theRochesterCommitteeforoooo>so~JR  
{{#Wiki_filter:DOCKETEDUSHRC80oUNITEDSTATESOFAMERICAJUN21980'UCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSION OfficeoftheSecretary Docketing 8ServiceBranchBEFORETHEATOMICSAFETYANDLICENSING BOARDIntheNatterofROCHESTER GASANDELECTRICCORPORATION
/~lylP ScientificInformation("RCSI")onJanuary8,1973;Mr.MichaelSladeonJanuary8,1973.LicenseeansweredeachofthesepetitionsforleavetointerveneonJanuary17and18,1973.TheCommission'.sRegulatoryStafffiledanswerstoeachofthepetitionstointerveneonJanuary18,22,'nd23,1973.OnApril18,1973,noticeoftheavailabilityoftheCommission'sDraftEnvironmentalStatementrelatinggtotheR.E.Ginnafacilitywaspublished,invitingpubliccomment.OnMay15,'f973,theAtomicSafetyandLicensingBoardwasestablished.ByorderdatedJune8theBoardorderedahearingandadmittedpetitionerMichaelSlade.ItdeniedthepetitionofRCSI,but.allowedRCSIleavetoamenditspetition.ItdeniedthepetitiontointerveneofMonroeCountyConservationCouncil.ThepetitionoftheStateofNewYorkwasgranted.OnJuly3,1973,RCSIfiledanamendedpetition,.whichwasansweredbyLicenseeonJuly16,1973andbytheStaffonJuly26,1973.By'orderdatedAugust2,1973,theamendedpetitionoftheRCSIwasgranted.TheBoardissuedanoticeofpublichearingonAugust2,1973.Answerstothenoticeofhearingwere.filedbyLicenseeandNewYorkStateonAugust9,1973.OnDecember11,1973,theBoardissuedanoticeandorderforpre-hearingconference.OnDecember19,1973,noticeof  
,(R;E.GinnaNuclearPower.Plant,UnitNo.1)))))DocketNo.50-244)))'ICENSEE'S RESPONSETOREQUESTFORSTATUSREPORTONPROCEEDING ByOrderdatedApril29,1980,theBoardorderedeachofthepartiestosubmitareportonthestatusofthecaptione'd proceeding.
Rochester GasandElectricCorporation
("Licensee"
)repliesasfollows:1.OnAugust15,1972,Licenseefiledanapplica-tiondatedAugust9,1972,entitled"Application toConvertProvisional Operating LicensetoFull-Term Operating LicenseOrAlternatively ToExtendtheTermination DateoftheProvisional Operating Lic'ense"
("Application"
)fortheR.E.GinnaNuclearPowerPlant,UnitNo.1.Following publicnoticedatedNovember22,1972,petitions tointervene Pwerefiledby:theStateofNewYork,asaninterested state,onJanuary5,1973;theMonroeCountyConservation CouncilonJanuary5,1973;theRochester Committee foroooo>so~JR  
/~lylP Scientific Information
("RCSI")onJanuary8,1973;Mr.MichaelSladeonJanuary8,1973.Licenseeansweredeachofthesepetitions forleavetointervene onJanuary17and18,1973.TheCommission'.s Regulatory Stafffiledanswerstoeachofthepetitions tointervene onJanuary18,22,'nd23,1973.OnApril18,1973,noticeoftheavailability oftheCommission's DraftEnvironmental Statement relatinggtotheR.E.Ginnafacilitywaspublished, invitingpubliccomment.OnMay15,'f973,theAtomicSafetyandLicensing Boardwasestablished.
ByorderdatedJune8theBoardorderedahearingandadmittedpetitioner MichaelSlade.ItdeniedthepetitionofRCSI,but.allowed RCSIleavetoamenditspetition.
Itdeniedthepetitiontointervene ofMonroeCountyConservation Council.ThepetitionoftheStateofNewYorkwasgranted.OnJuly3,1973,RCSIfiledanamendedpetition,
.whichwasansweredbyLicenseeonJuly16,1973andbytheStaffonJuly26,1973.By'orderdatedAugust2,1973,theamendedpetitionoftheRCSIwasgranted.TheBoardissuedanoticeofpublichearingonAugust2,1973.Answerstothenoticeofhearingwere.filedbyLicenseeandNewYorkStateonAugust9,1973.OnDecember11,1973,theBoardissuedanoticeandorderforpre-hearing conference.
OnDecember19,1973,noticeof  


havailabilityoftheCommission'sFinalEnvironmentalStatementfortheGinnafacilitywaspublished.OnrDecember'20,1973,.thefirstoftenamendmentstotheApplicationwasfiled.*OnMarch12,1974,followingseveralpostponementsiapre-hearingconferencewasheld.ThatsamedayintervenorMichaelSladefiledrevisions-tohispetitiontointervene.Atthepre-hearingconference,theBoardgrantedMr.Sladetheopportunitytorevise,andresubmithiscontentions.AlsoonMarch12,1974,RCSIandLicensee.reachedastipula-tionterminatingtheproceeding.astoRCSI,whichwasfiledwiththeBoardonMarch13,1974.OnMarch26,1974,theStafffiledamotionforBoardapprovalofanattached,stipulationrelatingtoadmissionofcontentionsbetweeninterven'orMichaelSladeandtheStaff.OnApril5,1974,LicenseeopposedacceptanceoftheStaff'smotion,movedtostrikeMr.Slade'scontentions,andmovedtodismisshisintervention.ItalsofiledananswertotheStaff'smotionforapprovalbytheBoardofthestipulationrelatingtothe.admissionof'ontentions.OnApril22,1974,intervenorMichaelSladereplied,toApplicant'smotionof.April5,1974;',OnApril24;1974,theStaffrepliedto*ThelatestamendmenttotheApplicationwasfiledJuly6,1979.  
havailability oftheCommission's FinalEnvironmental Statement fortheGinnafacilitywaspublished.
OnrDecember'20, 1973,.thefirstoftenamendments totheApplication wasfiled.*OnMarch12,1974,following severalpostponementsi apre-hearing conference washeld.Thatsamedayintervenor MichaelSladefiledrevisions-tohispetitiontointervene.
Atthepre-hearing conference, theBoardgrantedMr.Sladetheopportunity torevise,and resubmithiscontentions.
AlsoonMarch12,1974,RCSIandLicensee.
reachedastipula-tionterminating theproceeding
.astoRCSI,whichwasfiledwiththeBoardonMarch13,1974.OnMarch26,1974,theStafffiledamotionforBoardapprovalofanattached, stipulation relatingtoadmission ofcontentions betweeninterven'or MichaelSladeandtheStaff.OnApril5,1974,Licenseeopposedacceptance oftheStaff'smotion,movedtostrikeMr.Slade'scontentions, andmovedtodismisshisintervention.
ItalsofiledananswertotheStaff'smotionforapprovalbytheBoardofthestipulation relatingtothe.admission of'ontentions.
OnApril22,1974,intervenor MichaelSladereplied,toApplicant's motionof.April5,1974;',OnApril24;1974,theStaffrepliedto*Thelatestamendment totheApplication wasfiledJuly6,1979.  


Licensee'soppositiontothestipulationandmovedtodenyLicensee'smotiontodismiss.lOnMarch25,1977,theBoardissueditsorderrulingonthecontentionsofintervenorMichaelSladeanddeniedLicensee'smotiontodismissMr.Slade'sintervention.Itsetforththecontentionsadmittedintheproceedingand,treaffirmedtheparticipationoftheStateofNewYorkasan,interestedstatepursuantto10C.F.R.52.715(c).'nDecember13,1977,theCommissioninformedLicenseethattheGinnastationwastobeincludedintheCommission's,SystematicEvaluationProgram("SEP")fornuclear-poweredfacilities,resultsofwhichwouldprovideanadequatebasisfordecisionsregardingfull-termlicenses,andthattheconversionofallremainingprovisionaloperatinglicensestofull-termlicenseswouldawaitcompletionoftheSEP.ByletterofDecember13,1977,totheBoard,theStaffproposedtoinitiatediscussionswithLicenseeandMr.SladeontheimpactoftheSEPontheproceeding.Licenseeisunawarethattherehavebeenanysuchdiscussions.OnDecember14,1979,LicenseeandRCSIfiledwiththeBoardastipulationconfirmingtheirearlierstipulationterminatingtheproceedingastoRCSIdatedMarch12,1974.ThisstipulationfurtherrelievedLicenseeofcertainrequirementswhichwerecontainedin,theearlierstipulation.  
Licensee's opposition tothestipulation andmovedtodenyLicensee's motiontodismiss.lOnMarch25,1977,theBoardissueditsorderrulingonthecontentions ofintervenor MichaelSladeanddeniedLicensee's motiontodismissMr.Slade'sintervention.
Itsetforththecontentions admittedintheproceeding and,treaffirmed theparticipation oftheStateofNewYorkasan,interested statepursuantto10C.F.R.52.715(c).
'nDecember13,1977,theCommission informedLicenseethattheGinnastationwastobeincludedintheCommission's, Systematic Evaluation Program("SEP")fornuclear-powered facilities, resultsofwhichwouldprovideanadequatebasisfordecisions regarding full-term
: licenses, andthattheconversion ofallremaining provisional operating licensestofull-term licenseswouldawaitcompletion oftheSEP.ByletterofDecember13,1977,totheBoard,theStaffproposedtoinitiatediscussions withLicenseeandMr.SladeontheimpactoftheSEPontheproceeding.
Licenseeisunawarethattherehavebeenanysuchdiscussions.
OnDecember14,1979,LicenseeandRCSIfiledwiththeBoardastipulation confirming theirearlierstipulation terminating theproceeding astoRCSIdatedMarch12,1974.Thisstipulation furtherrelievedLicenseeofcertainrequirements whichwerecontained in,theearlierstipulation.  


2.BasedontheorderoftheAtomicSafetyandLicensingBoarddatedMarch25,1977,thefollowingissuesremain:I1.Intervenor'sContentionAconcerningthe'dequacyofLicensee'sQualityAssuranceProgram;2.Intervenor'sContentionBthatLicenseehasnotdemonstratedconformancewiththeamendedECCScriteriaasdeterminedbyAECDocketK1-50-1.3.Intervenor'sContentionDconcerningLicensee'sallegedviolationofapplicablefederalandNewYorkStatewaterqualitystandards.4.Intervenor'sContentionEthattheenvironmentalanalysisforthisfacilityisinadequatebecauseitfailstoconsiderthermaleffectsofdischargedwateronlake.biota.5.Intervenor'sContentionFthattheFESisinadequatebecauseitfailstotreatenergy'conservationalternatives.6..Intervenor''sContentionIthatthesitecontingencyplanisinadequate.7.Intervenor'sContentionJthatLicenseehasfailedtoprovideadequatefloodprotection.8.Intervenor'sContentionKthatLicensee'sradwastesystemsmanagementprogramisinadequate.
2.BasedontheorderoftheAtomicSafetyandLicensing BoarddatedMarch25,1977,thefollowing issuesremain:I1.Intervenor's Contention Aconcerning the'dequacy ofLicensee's QualityAssurance Program;2.Intervenor's Contention BthatLicenseehasnotdemonstrated conformance withtheamendedECCScriteriaasdetermined byAECDocketK1-50-1.3.Intervenor's Contention Dconcerning Licensee's allegedviolation ofapplicable federalandNewYorkStatewaterqualitystandards.
I AcopyoftheBoard'sorder,settingforththesecontentionsindetail,isattached.3.Thepartiesremaininginthisproceedingare:1a)Licensee;b)theNuclearRegulatoryCommissionStaff;c)Mr.MichaelSlade,Intervenor;andd)theStateofNewYork.PursuanttostipulationsfiledMarch12,1974,andDecember14,1979,theRCSIhasindicateditsintentiontoterminateitsparticipationintheproceeding.4.Licensee'sunderstandingofthefuture'courseofactionintheseproceedingsisthattheStaffwillissueaSafetyEvaluationReport("SER")followingcompletionoftheSEP.NeunderstandthatthetargetdateforsuchcompletionisApril1982.Accordingly,Licenseesuggeststhefollowingschedule:a)twomonthsfollowingissuanceoftheStaffSER,theAdvisoryCommitteeonReactorSafeguards("ACRS")meet,makeitsdeterminations",andissueitsletterregardingitsfindingswithintwoweeksthereafter;b).anynecessary'supplementtotheSERbeissuedbytheStafftwomonthsfollowingreceiptoftheACRSletter;  
4.Intervenor's Contention Ethattheenvironmental analysisforthisfacilityisinadequate becauseitfailstoconsiderthermaleffectsofdischarged wateronlake.biota.5.Intervenor's Contention FthattheFESisinadequate becauseitfailstotreatenergy'conservation alternatives.
6..Intervenor''s Contention Ithatthesitecontingency planisinadequate.
7.Intervenor's Contention JthatLicenseehasfailedtoprovideadequatefloodprotection.
8.Intervenor's Contention KthatLicensee's radwastesystemsmanagement programisinadequate.
I AcopyoftheBoard'sorder,settingforththesecontentions indetail,isattached.
3.Thepartiesremaining inthisproceeding are:1a)Licensee; b)theNuclearRegulatory Commission Staff;c)Mr.MichaelSlade,Intervenor; andd)theStateofNewYork.Pursuanttostipulations filedMarch12,1974,andDecember14,1979,theRCSIhasindicated itsintention toterminate itsparticipation intheproceeding.
4.Licensee's understanding ofthefuture'courseofactionintheseproceedings isthattheStaffwillissueaSafetyEvaluation Report("SER")following completion oftheSEP.Neunderstand thatthetargetdateforsuchcompletion isApril1982.Accordingly, Licenseesuggeststhefollowing schedule:
a)twomonthsfollowing issuanceoftheStaffSER,theAdvisoryCommittee onReactorSafeguards("ACRS")meet,makeitsdeterminations",
andissueitsletterregarding itsfindingswithintwoweeksthereafter; b).anynecessary'supplement totheSERbeissuedbytheStafftwomonthsfollowing receiptoftheACRSletter;  


c)alldiscoverybypartiesbeterminatedwithinonemonthfollowingtheissuanceofanynecessarySERsupplement;d)anyfurtherpre-hearingconferences.necessaryatthattimetakeplacewithinonemonthfollowingsupplementationoftheSER."e)thehearingshouldfollowassoont'hereafter,aspossible;f)aninitialdecisionbeissuedwithintwomonthsfollowingthecompletionofthehearing;andg)assumingthattheinitialdecisionis'favorable,afull-termoperatinglicensebeissuedimmediatelythereafter.Licenseerecommends.thatinlihtof'he5ggStaff'scommitmenttopursuecompletionoftheSEPpriortoissuanceofanSER,nothingneedbedoneinthismatteruntilsuchdateastheSEPreviewhasbeen'completed.Thereafter,Licenseerecommendstheschedulesuggestedinparagraph4.bepursued.Licenseealsorecommendsthatthe
c)alldiscovery bypartiesbeterminated withinonemonthfollowing theissuanceofanynecessary SERsupplement; d)anyfurtherpre-hearing conferences
.necessary atthattimetakeplacewithinonemonthfollowing supplementation oftheSER."e)thehearingshouldfollowassoont'hereafter,aspossible; f)aninitialdecisionbeissuedwithintwomonthsfollowing thecompletion ofthehearing;andg)assumingthattheinitialdecisionis'favorable, afull-term operating licensebeissuedimmediately thereafter.
Licenseerecommends.
thatinlihtof'he5ggStaff'scommitment topursuecompletion oftheSEPpriortoissuanceofanSER,nothingneedbedoneinthismatteruntilsuchdateastheSEPreviewhasbeen'completed.
Thereafter,Licenseerecommends theschedulesuggested inparagraph 4.bepursued.Licenseealsorecommends thatthe


Boardmaywishtoreviewthestatusofthisproceedinginaboutoneyeartodeterminethethen-currentprogressoftheSEPanditseffectonthescheduleforthisproceeding.Respectfullysubmitted,LeBOEUF,LAMB,LEIBY&NacRAEByPtner1333NewHampshireAvenue,N.W.Washington,D..C.20036(202)457-75001AttorneysforRochesterGasandElectric.CorporationDated:June2,1980-8-}}
Boardmaywishtoreviewthestatusofthisproceeding inaboutoneyeartodetermine thethen-current progressoftheSEPanditseffectonthescheduleforthisproceeding.
Respectfully submitted, LeBOEUF,LAMB,LEIBY&NacRAEByPtner1333NewHampshire Avenue,N.W.Washington, D..C.20036(202)457-75001AttorneysforRochester GasandElectric.Corporation Dated:June2,1980-8-}}

Revision as of 14:51, 29 June 2018

Status Rept in Response to Aslb 800429 Order.Recommends Schedule for Findings,Safety Evaluation Suppl,Discovery & Further Prehearing Conferences.Recommends Determination of SEP Progress in One Yr
ML17250A328
Person / Time
Site: Ginna Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/02/1980
From: VOIGT H H
LEBOEUF, LAMB, LEIBY & MACRAE, ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML17250A329 List:
References
NUDOCS 8006180006
Download: ML17250A328 (16)
v • d • e


Text

DOCKETEDUSHRC80oUNITEDSTATESOFAMERICAJUN21980'UCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSION OfficeoftheSecretary Docketing 8ServiceBranchBEFORETHEATOMICSAFETYANDLICENSING BOARDIntheNatterofROCHESTER GASANDELECTRICCORPORATION

,(R;E.GinnaNuclearPower.Plant,UnitNo.1)))))DocketNo.50-244)))'ICENSEE'S RESPONSETOREQUESTFORSTATUSREPORTONPROCEEDING ByOrderdatedApril29,1980,theBoardorderedeachofthepartiestosubmitareportonthestatusofthecaptione'd proceeding.

Rochester GasandElectricCorporation

("Licensee"

)repliesasfollows:1.OnAugust15,1972,Licenseefiledanapplica-tiondatedAugust9,1972,entitled"Application toConvertProvisional Operating LicensetoFull-Term Operating LicenseOrAlternatively ToExtendtheTermination DateoftheProvisional Operating Lic'ense"

("Application"

)fortheR.E.GinnaNuclearPowerPlant,UnitNo.1.Following publicnoticedatedNovember22,1972,petitions tointervene Pwerefiledby:theStateofNewYork,asaninterested state,onJanuary5,1973;theMonroeCountyConservation CouncilonJanuary5,1973;theRochester Committee foroooo>so~JR

/~lylP Scientific Information

("RCSI")onJanuary8,1973;Mr.MichaelSladeonJanuary8,1973.Licenseeansweredeachofthesepetitions forleavetointervene onJanuary17and18,1973.TheCommission'.s Regulatory Stafffiledanswerstoeachofthepetitions tointervene onJanuary18,22,'nd23,1973.OnApril18,1973,noticeoftheavailability oftheCommission's DraftEnvironmental Statement relatinggtotheR.E.Ginnafacilitywaspublished, invitingpubliccomment.OnMay15,'f973,theAtomicSafetyandLicensing Boardwasestablished.

ByorderdatedJune8theBoardorderedahearingandadmittedpetitioner MichaelSlade.ItdeniedthepetitionofRCSI,but.allowed RCSIleavetoamenditspetition.

Itdeniedthepetitiontointervene ofMonroeCountyConservation Council.ThepetitionoftheStateofNewYorkwasgranted.OnJuly3,1973,RCSIfiledanamendedpetition,

.whichwasansweredbyLicenseeonJuly16,1973andbytheStaffonJuly26,1973.By'orderdatedAugust2,1973,theamendedpetitionoftheRCSIwasgranted.TheBoardissuedanoticeofpublichearingonAugust2,1973.Answerstothenoticeofhearingwere.filedbyLicenseeandNewYorkStateonAugust9,1973.OnDecember11,1973,theBoardissuedanoticeandorderforpre-hearing conference.

OnDecember19,1973,noticeof

havailability oftheCommission's FinalEnvironmental Statement fortheGinnafacilitywaspublished.

OnrDecember'20, 1973,.thefirstoftenamendments totheApplication wasfiled.*OnMarch12,1974,following severalpostponementsi apre-hearing conference washeld.Thatsamedayintervenor MichaelSladefiledrevisions-tohispetitiontointervene.

Atthepre-hearing conference, theBoardgrantedMr.Sladetheopportunity torevise,and resubmithiscontentions.

AlsoonMarch12,1974,RCSIandLicensee.

reachedastipula-tionterminating theproceeding

.astoRCSI,whichwasfiledwiththeBoardonMarch13,1974.OnMarch26,1974,theStafffiledamotionforBoardapprovalofanattached, stipulation relatingtoadmission ofcontentions betweeninterven'or MichaelSladeandtheStaff.OnApril5,1974,Licenseeopposedacceptance oftheStaff'smotion,movedtostrikeMr.Slade'scontentions, andmovedtodismisshisintervention.

ItalsofiledananswertotheStaff'smotionforapprovalbytheBoardofthestipulation relatingtothe.admission of'ontentions.

OnApril22,1974,intervenor MichaelSladereplied,toApplicant's motionof.April5,1974;',OnApril24;1974,theStaffrepliedto*Thelatestamendment totheApplication wasfiledJuly6,1979.

Licensee's opposition tothestipulation andmovedtodenyLicensee's motiontodismiss.lOnMarch25,1977,theBoardissueditsorderrulingonthecontentions ofintervenor MichaelSladeanddeniedLicensee's motiontodismissMr.Slade'sintervention.

Itsetforththecontentions admittedintheproceeding and,treaffirmed theparticipation oftheStateofNewYorkasan,interested statepursuantto10C.F.R.52.715(c).

'nDecember13,1977,theCommission informedLicenseethattheGinnastationwastobeincludedintheCommission's, Systematic Evaluation Program("SEP")fornuclear-powered facilities, resultsofwhichwouldprovideanadequatebasisfordecisions regarding full-term

licenses, andthattheconversion ofallremaining provisional operating licensestofull-term licenseswouldawaitcompletion oftheSEP.ByletterofDecember13,1977,totheBoard,theStaffproposedtoinitiatediscussions withLicenseeandMr.SladeontheimpactoftheSEPontheproceeding.

Licenseeisunawarethattherehavebeenanysuchdiscussions.

OnDecember14,1979,LicenseeandRCSIfiledwiththeBoardastipulation confirming theirearlierstipulation terminating theproceeding astoRCSIdatedMarch12,1974.Thisstipulation furtherrelievedLicenseeofcertainrequirements whichwerecontained in,theearlierstipulation.

2.BasedontheorderoftheAtomicSafetyandLicensing BoarddatedMarch25,1977,thefollowing issuesremain:I1.Intervenor's Contention Aconcerning the'dequacy ofLicensee's QualityAssurance Program;2.Intervenor's Contention BthatLicenseehasnotdemonstrated conformance withtheamendedECCScriteriaasdetermined byAECDocketK1-50-1.3.Intervenor's Contention Dconcerning Licensee's allegedviolation ofapplicable federalandNewYorkStatewaterqualitystandards.

4.Intervenor's Contention Ethattheenvironmental analysisforthisfacilityisinadequate becauseitfailstoconsiderthermaleffectsofdischarged wateronlake.biota.5.Intervenor's Contention FthattheFESisinadequate becauseitfailstotreatenergy'conservation alternatives.

6..Intervenors Contention Ithatthesitecontingency planisinadequate.

7.Intervenor's Contention JthatLicenseehasfailedtoprovideadequatefloodprotection.

8.Intervenor's Contention KthatLicensee's radwastesystemsmanagement programisinadequate.

I AcopyoftheBoard'sorder,settingforththesecontentions indetail,isattached.

3.Thepartiesremaining inthisproceeding are:1a)Licensee; b)theNuclearRegulatory Commission Staff;c)Mr.MichaelSlade,Intervenor; andd)theStateofNewYork.Pursuanttostipulations filedMarch12,1974,andDecember14,1979,theRCSIhasindicated itsintention toterminate itsparticipation intheproceeding.

4.Licensee's understanding ofthefuture'courseofactionintheseproceedings isthattheStaffwillissueaSafetyEvaluation Report("SER")following completion oftheSEP.Neunderstand thatthetargetdateforsuchcompletion isApril1982.Accordingly, Licenseesuggeststhefollowing schedule:

a)twomonthsfollowing issuanceoftheStaffSER,theAdvisoryCommittee onReactorSafeguards("ACRS")meet,makeitsdeterminations",

andissueitsletterregarding itsfindingswithintwoweeksthereafter; b).anynecessary'supplement totheSERbeissuedbytheStafftwomonthsfollowing receiptoftheACRSletter;

c)alldiscovery bypartiesbeterminated withinonemonthfollowing theissuanceofanynecessary SERsupplement; d)anyfurtherpre-hearing conferences

.necessary atthattimetakeplacewithinonemonthfollowing supplementation oftheSER."e)thehearingshouldfollowassoont'hereafter,aspossible; f)aninitialdecisionbeissuedwithintwomonthsfollowing thecompletion ofthehearing;andg)assumingthattheinitialdecisionis'favorable, afull-term operating licensebeissuedimmediately thereafter.

Licenseerecommends.

thatinlihtof'he5ggStaff'scommitment topursuecompletion oftheSEPpriortoissuanceofanSER,nothingneedbedoneinthismatteruntilsuchdateastheSEPreviewhasbeen'completed.

Thereafter,Licenseerecommends theschedulesuggested inparagraph 4.bepursued.Licenseealsorecommends thatthe

Boardmaywishtoreviewthestatusofthisproceeding inaboutoneyeartodetermine thethen-current progressoftheSEPanditseffectonthescheduleforthisproceeding.

Respectfully submitted, LeBOEUF,LAMB,LEIBY&NacRAEByPtner1333NewHampshire Avenue,N.W.Washington, D..C.20036(202)457-75001AttorneysforRochester GasandElectric.Corporation Dated:June2,1980-8-

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17250A328&oldid=745961"