ML14233A193: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| document type = Acceptance Review Letter, E-Mail | | document type = Acceptance Review Letter, E-Mail | ||
| page count = 1 | | page count = 1 | ||
| project = TAC: | | project = TAC:MF4574, TAC:MF4575 | ||
| stage = Acceptance Review | | stage = Acceptance Review | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Salem Unit 1 & 2: Acceptance Review Request to Use TSTF-510 (MF4574 and MF4575)Paul, ByletterdatedJuly28,2014(ADAMSAccessionNo.ML14210A484),PSEGNuclearLLC(PSEG)submittedalicenseamendmentrequestforSalemNuclearGeneratingStation,UnitNos.1and2(Salem).Theproposedamendmentwouldmodifytechnicalspecification(TS)requirementsregardingsteamgeneratortubeinspectionsandreportingasdescribedinTSTF510,Revision2,"RevisiontoSteamGeneratorProgramInspectionFrequenciesandTubeSampleSelection."Inaddition,theproposedamendmentwouldreviseSalemUnitNo.2'sTSs6.8.4.i,"SteamGenerator(SG)Program,"6.9.1.10,"SteamGeneratorTubeInspectionReport,"andthebasessectionof3/4.4.6,"SteamGenerator(SG)TubeIntegrity,"toremoveunnecessaryinformationrelatedtotheoriginalSalemUnitNo.2Westinghousesteamgenerators.ThepurposeofthisletteristoprovidetheresultsoftheU.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommission(NRC)staff'sacceptancereviewofthisamendmentrequest.TheacceptancereviewwasperformedtodetermineifthereissufficienttechnicalinformationinscopeanddepthtoallowtheNRCstafftocompleteitsdetailedtechnicalreview.Theacceptancereviewisalsointendedtoidentifywhethertheapplicationhasanyreadilyapparentinformationinsufficienciesinitscharacterizationoftheregulatoryrequirementsorthelicensingbasisoftheplant. | Salem Unit 1 & 2: Acceptance Review Request to Use TSTF-510 (MF4574 and MF4575)Paul, ByletterdatedJuly28,2014(ADAMSAccessionNo.ML14210A484),PSEGNuclearLLC(PSEG)submittedalicenseamendmentrequestforSalemNuclearGeneratingStation,UnitNos.1and2(Salem).Theproposedamendmentwouldmodifytechnicalspecification(TS)requirementsregardingsteamgeneratortubeinspectionsandreportingasdescribedinTSTF510,Revision2,"RevisiontoSteamGeneratorProgramInspectionFrequenciesandTubeSampleSelection."Inaddition,theproposedamendmentwouldreviseSalemUnitNo.2'sTSs6.8.4.i,"SteamGenerator(SG)Program,"6.9.1.10,"SteamGeneratorTubeInspectionReport,"andthebasessectionof3/4.4.6,"SteamGenerator(SG)TubeIntegrity,"toremoveunnecessaryinformationrelatedtotheoriginalSalemUnitNo.2Westinghousesteamgenerators.ThepurposeofthisletteristoprovidetheresultsoftheU.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommission(NRC)staff'sacceptancereviewofthisamendmentrequest.TheacceptancereviewwasperformedtodetermineifthereissufficienttechnicalinformationinscopeanddepthtoallowtheNRCstafftocompleteitsdetailedtechnicalreview.Theacceptancereviewisalsointendedtoidentifywhethertheapplicationhasanyreadilyapparentinformationinsufficienciesinitscharacterizationoftheregulatoryrequirementsorthelicensingbasisoftheplant. | ||
ConsistentwithSection50.90ofTitle10oftheCodeofFederalRegulations(10CFR),anamendmenttothelicense(includingthetechnicalspecifications)mustfullydescribethechangesrequested,andfollowingasfarasapplicable,theformprescribedfororiginalapplications.Section50.34of10CFRaddressesthecontentoftechnicalinformationrequired.Thissectionstipulatesthatthesubmittaladdressthedesignandoperatingcharacteristics,unusualornoveldesignfeatures,andprincipalsafetyconsiderations. | ConsistentwithSection50.90ofTitle10oftheCodeofFederalRegulations(10CFR),anamendmenttothelicense(includingthetechnicalspecifications)mustfullydescribethechangesrequested,andfollowingasfarasapplicable,theformprescribedfororiginalapplications.Section50.34of10CFRaddressesthecontentoftechnicalinformationrequired.Thissectionstipulatesthatthesubmittaladdressthedesignandoperatingcharacteristics,unusualornoveldesignfeatures,andprincipalsafetyconsiderations. | ||
TheNRCstaffhasreviewedyourapplicationandconcludedthatitdoesprovidetechnicalinformationinsufficientdetailtoenabletheNRCstafftocompleteitsdetailedtechnicalreviewandmakeanindependentassessmentregardingtheacceptabilityoftheproposedamendmentintermsofregulatoryrequirementsandtheprotectionofpublichealthandsafetyandtheenvironment.Giventhelesserscopeanddepthoftheacceptancereviewascomparedtothedetailedtechnicalreview,theremaybeinstancesinwhichissuesthatimpacttheNRCstaff'sabilitytocompletethedetailedtechnicalreviewareidentifieddespitecompletionofanadequateacceptancereview.YouwillbeadvisedofanyfurtherinformationneededtosupporttheNRCstaff'sdetailedtechnicalreviewbyseparatecorrespondence.Ifyouhaveanyquestions,pleasecontactmeat3014151603CarleenSanders,ProjectManagerPlantLicensingBranchI2DivisionofOperatingReactorLicensingOfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation DocketNos.50272and50311 | TheNRCstaffhasreviewedyourapplicationandconcludedthatitdoesprovidetechnicalinformationinsufficientdetailtoenabletheNRCstafftocompleteitsdetailedtechnicalreviewandmakeanindependentassessmentregardingtheacceptabilityoftheproposedamendmentintermsofregulatoryrequirementsandtheprotectionofpublichealthandsafetyandtheenvironment.Giventhelesserscopeanddepthoftheacceptancereviewascomparedtothedetailedtechnicalreview,theremaybeinstancesinwhichissuesthatimpacttheNRCstaff'sabilitytocompletethedetailedtechnicalreviewareidentifieddespitecompletionofanadequateacceptancereview.YouwillbeadvisedofanyfurtherinformationneededtosupporttheNRCstaff'sdetailedtechnicalreviewbyseparatecorrespondence.Ifyouhaveanyquestions,pleasecontactmeat3014151603CarleenSanders,ProjectManagerPlantLicensingBranchI2DivisionofOperatingReactorLicensingOfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation DocketNos.50272and50311}} | ||
}} | |||
Revision as of 23:21, 26 June 2018
| ML14233A193 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem |
| Issue date: | 08/21/2014 |
| From: | Sanders C J Plant Licensing Branch 1 |
| To: | Duke P R Public Service Enterprise Group |
| Sanders C | |
| References | |
| TAC MF4574, TAC MF4575 | |
| Download: ML14233A193 (1) | |
Text
1Sanders, CarleenFrom:Sanders, CarleenSent:Thursday, August 21, 2014 10:06 AMTo:Duke, Paul R. (Paul.Duke@pseg.com)
Subject:
Salem Unit 1 & 2: Acceptance Review Request to Use TSTF-510 (MF4574 and MF4575)Paul, ByletterdatedJuly28,2014(ADAMSAccessionNo.ML14210A484),PSEGNuclearLLC(PSEG)submittedalicenseamendmentrequestforSalemNuclearGeneratingStation,UnitNos.1and2(Salem).Theproposedamendmentwouldmodifytechnicalspecification(TS)requirementsregardingsteamgeneratortubeinspectionsandreportingasdescribedinTSTF510,Revision2,"RevisiontoSteamGeneratorProgramInspectionFrequenciesandTubeSampleSelection."Inaddition,theproposedamendmentwouldreviseSalemUnitNo.2'sTSs6.8.4.i,"SteamGenerator(SG)Program,"6.9.1.10,"SteamGeneratorTubeInspectionReport,"andthebasessectionof3/4.4.6,"SteamGenerator(SG)TubeIntegrity,"toremoveunnecessaryinformationrelatedtotheoriginalSalemUnitNo.2Westinghousesteamgenerators.ThepurposeofthisletteristoprovidetheresultsoftheU.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommission(NRC)staff'sacceptancereviewofthisamendmentrequest.TheacceptancereviewwasperformedtodetermineifthereissufficienttechnicalinformationinscopeanddepthtoallowtheNRCstafftocompleteitsdetailedtechnicalreview.Theacceptancereviewisalsointendedtoidentifywhethertheapplicationhasanyreadilyapparentinformationinsufficienciesinitscharacterizationoftheregulatoryrequirementsorthelicensingbasisoftheplant.
ConsistentwithSection50.90ofTitle10oftheCodeofFederalRegulations(10CFR),anamendmenttothelicense(includingthetechnicalspecifications)mustfullydescribethechangesrequested,andfollowingasfarasapplicable,theformprescribedfororiginalapplications.Section50.34of10CFRaddressesthecontentoftechnicalinformationrequired.Thissectionstipulatesthatthesubmittaladdressthedesignandoperatingcharacteristics,unusualornoveldesignfeatures,andprincipalsafetyconsiderations.
TheNRCstaffhasreviewedyourapplicationandconcludedthatitdoesprovidetechnicalinformationinsufficientdetailtoenabletheNRCstafftocompleteitsdetailedtechnicalreviewandmakeanindependentassessmentregardingtheacceptabilityoftheproposedamendmentintermsofregulatoryrequirementsandtheprotectionofpublichealthandsafetyandtheenvironment.Giventhelesserscopeanddepthoftheacceptancereviewascomparedtothedetailedtechnicalreview,theremaybeinstancesinwhichissuesthatimpacttheNRCstaff'sabilitytocompletethedetailedtechnicalreviewareidentifieddespitecompletionofanadequateacceptancereview.YouwillbeadvisedofanyfurtherinformationneededtosupporttheNRCstaff'sdetailedtechnicalreviewbyseparatecorrespondence.Ifyouhaveanyquestions,pleasecontactmeat3014151603CarleenSanders,ProjectManagerPlantLicensingBranchI2DivisionofOperatingReactorLicensingOfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation DocketNos.50272and50311