05000331/FIN-2018010-01: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 5: Line 5:
| finding integer = 01
| finding integer = 01
| quarter = 2018Q1
| quarter = 2018Q1
| IR section = HUMAN PERFORMANCE
| IR section = NO SECTION
| finding type = NCV
| finding type = NCV
| significance =  
| significance = Green
| cornerstone = Initiating Events
| cornerstone = Initiating Events
| violation of =  
| violation of =  
| identified by = NRC
| identified by = NRC
| Inspection procedure = IP NO SECTION
| Inspection procedure = IP 71111.05T
| Inspector = 71111.05
| Inspector = A Dahbur, I Hafeez, J Patel, R Daley
| CCA = WP.3
| CCA = H2c
| INPO aspect = NO SL
| INPO aspect = WP.3
| description = The inspectors identified a finding of very-low safety significance (Green), and associated Non-Cited Violation of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part50.48(c), and National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)805, Section 3.4.2,Pre-Fire Plans.  Specifically, the inspectors identified two examples for the licensees failure to have current and detailed pre-fire plans.  The first example for the failure to provide adequate guidance in the pre-fire plans for smoke and heat removal in the event of a fire in switchgear rooms. The second example was for the failure to show the addition of the Flexible Coping Strategiesbattery packsas a potential hazard in the pre-fire plan for the battery roomcorridor.
| description = The inspectors identified a finding of very-low safety significance (Green), and associated Non-Cited Violation of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part50.48(c), and National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)805, Section 3.4.2,Pre-Fire Plans.  Specifically, the inspectors identified two examples for the licensees failure to have current and detailed pre-fire plans.  The first example for the failure to provide adequate guidance in the pre-fire plans for smoke and heat removal in the event of a fire in switchgear rooms. The second example was for the failure to show the addition of the Flexible Coping Strategiesbattery packsas a potential hazard in the pre-fire plan for the battery roomcorridor.
}}
}}

Revision as of 08:00, 30 May 2018

01
Site: Duane Arnold NextEra Energy icon.png
Report IR 05000331/2018010 Section NO SECTION
Date counted Mar 31, 2018 (2018Q1)
Type: NCV: Green
cornerstone Initiating Events
Identified by: NRC identified
Inspection Procedure: IP 71111.05T
Inspectors (proximate) A Dahbur
I Hafeez
J Patel
R Daley
CCA H.7, Documentation
INPO aspect WP.3
'