ML20138A771: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
StriderTol Bot change
StriderTol Bot change
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:r  m
{{#Wiki_filter:::-ti.;a T.1er:ms
  i 4 ,
r
                                                                  ::-ti.;a T.1er:ms
m
                                                                              .
i 4
                                                        s
.
                                                          ~w n'    7 Wth]YiO&th&W
7 Wth]YiO&th&W
                                                      MAR 0 71986
,
      Docket No. 50-219
~w n'
      GPU Nuclear Corporation
s
      ATTN: Mr. P. B. Fiedler
MAR 0 71986
              Vice President and Director
Docket No. 50-219
      0yster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
GPU Nuclear Corporation
      P. O. Box 388
ATTN: Mr. P. B. Fiedler
      Forked River, NJ 08731
Vice President and Director
      Gentlemen:
0yster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
      Subject: Inspection No. 50-219/85-02
P. O. Box 388
      This is in reference to your letter dated April 24, 1985, in response to our
Forked River, NJ 08731
      letter dated March 29, 1985. We apologize for the delay in responding to your
Gentlemen:
      letter.
Subject: Inspection No. 50-219/85-02
      Thank you for informing us of the interim and final corrective actions
This is in reference to your letter dated April 24, 1985, in response to our
      documented in your letter. Those actions were examined during NRC Region I
letter dated March 29, 1985. We apologize for the delay in responding to your
      inspections conducted on May 14, 1985 and on July 22-26, 1985 and appeared to
letter.
      be adequate.
Thank you for informing us of the interim and final corrective actions
      In your response to Violation A, you contend that it was not technically
documented in your letter. Those actions were examined during NRC Region I
      feasible (or practical) to comply with the commitment in your physical security
inspections conducted on May 14, 1985 and on July 22-26, 1985 and appeared to
      plan. However, as demonstrated by your interim and final corrective actions,
be adequate.
      it is our view that it was technically feasible to comply with your commitment.
In your response to Violation A, you contend that it was not technically
      In addition, the measure you implemented on your own to compensate for the
feasible (or practical) to comply with the commitment in your physical security
      weakness, as described in the first paragraph of your response, did not obviate
plan. However, as demonstrated by your interim and final corrective actions,
      the vulnerability that formed the basis for the violation and, therefore, would
it is our view that it was technically feasible to comply with your commitment.
      not have been accepted for that purpose, if it had been submitted to the NRC.
In addition, the measure you implemented on your own to compensate for the
      Further, an obstruction in the same area added to the vulnerability, and the
weakness, as described in the first paragraph of your response, did not obviate
      existence of that obstruction was also not in compliance with NRC requirements.
the vulnerability that formed the basis for the violation and, therefore, would
      Therefore, we find that the violation is valid and will remain as cited.
not have been accepted for that purpose, if it had been submitted to the NRC.
      Attachment A to your letter contains information which is exempt from public
Further, an obstruction in the same area added to the vulnerability, and the
      disclosure in accordance with 10 CFR 73.21. Therefore, the attachment will
existence of that obstruction was also not in compliance with NRC requirements.
      not be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room and will receive limited
Therefore, we find that the violation is valid and will remain as cited.
      distribution.
Attachment A to your letter contains information which is exempt from public
      Your cooperation with us is appreciated.
disclosure in accordance with 10 CFR 73.21.
                                              Sincerely,
Therefore, the attachment will
                                                                                        '
not be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room and will receive limited
                                                Original Signed 3y:
distribution.
                                                  Thomas T. ta-tin
Your cooperation with us is appreciated.
                                              Thomas T. Martin, Director
Sincerely,
          $[2j@8%$$$o0[19                     Division of Radiation Safety and
'
                                                Safeguards
Original Signed 3y:
          G                   PDR
Thomas T. ta-tin
                                    0FFICIAL RECORD COPY         RL GPU - 0001.0.0                 '
Thomas T. Martin, Director
                                                                                                  '
$[2j@8%$$$o0[19
                                                                03/05/86
Division of Radiation Safety and
                                                                                  'tf.y! a.:d l10
PDR
Safeguards
G
0FFICIAL RECORD COPY
RL GPU - 0001.0.0
'
'
03/05/86
't y! a.:d l1
f.
0


r-
r-
I' . ,
'
'
  I' . ,
GPU Nuclear Corporation
        GPU Nuclear Corporation               2
2
                                                    W 07 M
W 07 M
        cc:
cc:
        M. Laggart, BWR Licensing Manager
M. Laggart, BWR Licensing Manager
        Licensing Manager, Oyster Creek
Licensing Manager, Oyster Creek
        Public Document Room (PDR)
Public Document Room (PDR)
        Local Public Document Room (LPDR)
Local Public Document Room (LPDR)
        Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
        NRC Resident Inspector
NRC Resident Inspector
        State.of New Jersey
State.of New Jersey
        bec w/ encl:
bec w/ encl:
        Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)
Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)
        Management Assistant, ORMA (w/o encl)
Management Assistant, ORMA (w/o encl)
        Section Chief, DRP
Section Chief, DRP
                /
/
              ,/
,/
        RI: RS                 S       R       SS
RI: RS
        Ke',ig/gcb       oy er           rt'i n
S
        j/[/86             I
R
                                  0FFICIAL RECORD COPY   RL GPU - 0001.1.0
SS
                                                          03/05/86
Ke',ig/gcb
                                                                            l
oy er
rt'i n
j/[/86
I
0FFICIAL RECORD COPY
RL GPU - 0001.1.0
03/05/86
l
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 23:31, 24 May 2025

Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-219/85-02. Corrective Actions Examined During Region I Insps on 850514 & 0722-26 Adequate
ML20138A771
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 03/07/1986
From: Martin T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Fiedler P
GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP.
References
NUDOCS 8603200056
Download: ML20138A771 (2)
v • d • e


See also: IR 05000219/1985002

Text

-ti.;a T.1er:ms

r

m

i 4

.

7 Wth]YiO&th&W

,

~w n'

s

MAR 0 71986

Docket No. 50-219

GPU Nuclear Corporation

ATTN: Mr. P. B. Fiedler

Vice President and Director

0yster Creek Nuclear Generating Station

P. O. Box 388

Forked River, NJ 08731

Gentlemen:

Subject: Inspection No. 50-219/85-02

This is in reference to your letter dated April 24, 1985, in response to our

letter dated March 29, 1985. We apologize for the delay in responding to your

letter.

Thank you for informing us of the interim and final corrective actions

documented in your letter. Those actions were examined during NRC Region I

inspections conducted on May 14, 1985 and on July 22-26, 1985 and appeared to

be adequate.

In your response to Violation A, you contend that it was not technically

feasible (or practical) to comply with the commitment in your physical security

plan. However, as demonstrated by your interim and final corrective actions,

it is our view that it was technically feasible to comply with your commitment.

In addition, the measure you implemented on your own to compensate for the

weakness, as described in the first paragraph of your response, did not obviate

the vulnerability that formed the basis for the violation and, therefore, would

not have been accepted for that purpose, if it had been submitted to the NRC.

Further, an obstruction in the same area added to the vulnerability, and the

existence of that obstruction was also not in compliance with NRC requirements.

Therefore, we find that the violation is valid and will remain as cited.

Attachment A to your letter contains information which is exempt from public

disclosure in accordance with 10 CFR 73.21.

Therefore, the attachment will

not be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room and will receive limited

distribution.

Your cooperation with us is appreciated.

Sincerely,

'

Original Signed 3y:

Thomas T. ta-tin

Thomas T. Martin, Director

$[2j@8%$$$o0[19

Division of Radiation Safety and

PDR

Safeguards

G

0FFICIAL RECORD COPY

RL GPU - 0001.0.0

'

'

03/05/86

't y! a.:d l1

f.

0

r-

I' . ,

'

GPU Nuclear Corporation

2

W 07 M

cc:

M. Laggart, BWR Licensing Manager

Licensing Manager, Oyster Creek

Public Document Room (PDR)

Local Public Document Room (LPDR)

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

NRC Resident Inspector

State.of New Jersey

bec w/ encl:

Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)

Management Assistant, ORMA (w/o encl)

Section Chief, DRP

/

,/

RI: RS

S

R

SS

Ke',ig/gcb

oy er

rt'i n

j/[/86

I

0FFICIAL RECORD COPY

RL GPU - 0001.1.0

03/05/86

l

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20138A771&oldid=5493319"