ML041170063: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:HARRIS EXAM | {{#Wiki_filter:HARRIS EXAM | ||
50-400/2004-301 | |||
FEBRUARY 23 - 27,2004 | |||
& MARCH 4,2004 (WRITTEN) | |||
& MARCH 4,2004 (WRITTEN) | |||
Harris | Harris | ||
Draft | |||
SRQ | |||
Written | Written | ||
2004 | |||
Harris NRC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
QUESTION: | QUESTION: | ||
Given the following conditions: | I | ||
Given the following conditions: | |||
Whiie operating at 100% power, a drop in PKZ pressure resulted in a Reactor Trip | |||
and Safety Injection. | |||
PRZ level is currently indicating > 100%. | |||
PRZ pressure has stabilized at 1400 psig. | |||
Containment pressure is 3.6 p i g and stable. | |||
RCPs have been stopped. | |||
RVtIS Full Range is indicating 20%. | |||
Core Exit Thermocouples are indicating 745'1:. | |||
Which of the following conditions currently exists'? | RC:S Wide Range Hot Leg Temperatures are indicating 6SO'I:. | ||
Which of the following conditions currently exists'? | |||
a. | |||
b. | |||
A PKZ steam space break has occurred and core heat removal is ADEQUAI'E | |||
ANSWER: | A PRZ steam space break has occurred arid core heat removal is INADEQUAIE | ||
An RCS hot ieg break has occurred and core heat removal is ADEQUATE | |||
An RCS hot leg break has occ.urred and core heat removal is INADEQL!A?'E | |||
c. | |||
d. | |||
ANSWER: | |||
b. A I'KZ steam space break has occurrcd and core heat removal is INADEQGATE | |||
Post Validation Rwision | |||
Harris NKC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
Llata Sheets | |||
QUESTION NUMBER: 1 | QUESTION NUMBER: | ||
1 | |||
TIEWGROUP: | |||
1:1 | |||
KA IMPORTANCE: | |||
RO | |||
SRO | |||
4.1 | |||
IOCFR55 CONTENT: | |||
41(b) | |||
43(b) | |||
5 | |||
KA: | |||
000008AA2.30 | |||
Ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply to the Pressurizer Vapor Space Accident: | |||
Inadequate core cooling | |||
ORJECTIVE: | |||
EOP-3.10-4 | |||
Given the following EOP steps, notes, aud cautions, describe the associated basis | |||
c. RVLIS level of 39 percent (C. I) | |||
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES: ECP-FRP-C. 1 | |||
C'SFST-Core Cooling | |||
REFERENCES SIJPPII,PED TO APPLICANT: | |||
None | |||
OUESTYON SOIJRCE: | |||
NEW fl | |||
SKGNIFICANT1.Y MODIFIED n | |||
DIRECT | |||
LA | |||
L A | |||
bl | |||
. | |||
BANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED / D I m c r : | |||
N ~ \\ V | |||
NRC EXAM HISTORY: | |||
None | |||
DISTR4CTOR .JUSTYFICACTIOIV (CORRECT ANSWER \\I'd): | |||
a. Plausible since the break is located in the PRZ steam space, but heat removal is not adequate. | |||
d b. 'the RCS is superheated and in excess of 700"F, which indicates that inadequate heat rerncwal is | |||
occuiiing. The break is in the PKZ steam space as indicated by the pressurizer being full. | |||
Plausible since RCS temperatures are stable, hut the break is in the stearn space and heat removal is | |||
not adequate. | |||
d. Plausihle since RCS heat removal is not adequate, but the break is in the steam space. | |||
c. | |||
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS: | |||
C0iW"IEPIENSIVE / ANALYSIS | |||
DIFTICLJ1,TY RATIXG: | |||
3 | |||
EXPLANATION: | |||
KNOWLEDGE /RECALL | |||
Must analyze plant conditions to determine location of hreak, determine that | |||
temperature indications support superheated conditions and that heat removal is | |||
inadequate | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
IIarris NRC Written Examindtion | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
QUESTION: | QUESTION: 2 | ||
Which of the following describes a condition which would require Emergency Uoration | Which of the following describes a condition which would require Emergency Uoration | ||
and the bases for taking this action? | and the bases for taking this action? | ||
a. | |||
e | |||
* | |||
h. | |||
e | |||
e | |||
c. * | |||
* | |||
d. * | |||
* | |||
'l'wenty minutes following a Main Feedwater Pump trip, Control Rods are | |||
determined to be below the rod insertion limit | |||
AKSWEW: | Control the reactivity transient associated with a steam line break | ||
Twenty minutes following a Main Feedwater Pump trip, Control Rods are | |||
determined to he helow the rod insertion limit | |||
Control the reactivity transient associated with an inadvertent dilution | |||
During a reactor startup, the Reactor achieves criticality with Bank C rods at | |||
Control the reactivity transient associated with a stearn line break | |||
105 steps | |||
During a reactor startup, the Reactor achieves critic.aIity with Bank C rods at | |||
Control the reactivity transient associated with an inadvertent dilution | |||
105 steps | |||
AKSWEW: | |||
c. | |||
e | |||
During a reactor startup. the Reactor achieves criticality with Bank C rods at | |||
Control the reactivity transient associated with a steam line break | |||
IO5 steps | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Harris NRC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Opcrator | |||
Data Sheets | |||
QUESTION NUMBER: 2 | QUESTION NUMBER: 2 | ||
TIEWGROUP: | |||
li2 | |||
KA IMPORTANCE: | |||
RO | |||
SRO | |||
3.7 | |||
llOCFR55 CONTENT: | |||
41(b) | |||
43(b) | |||
2 | |||
KA: | |||
000024G2.2.25 | |||
Knowledge of bases in technical specifications for limiting conditions for operations and safety limits | |||
(Emergency norat ion) | |||
OBJECTIVE: | |||
CVCS-3.0-R4 | |||
Given a (.VCS coniponentipa~anieter, state whether the componentiparameter is Tech Spec related | |||
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES: | |||
IS Bases 3i4.1.1 | |||
.4OP-002 ED | |||
tip-004 | |||
REFERENCES SIJPPLIED TO APPLICANT: | |||
?\\one | |||
QUE.STIOK SOURCE: | |||
NEW | |||
SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED [3 DIRECT | |||
BANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY iV1C)DIFIED / DIRECT: | |||
AOP-3.2-Kl 001 | |||
NRC EXAM HISTORY: | |||
None | |||
DISTRACTOR JIJSTIFICACTION (CORRECT ANSWER dd): | |||
a. Plausible since if this condition existed for 2 hours, instead of 20 minutes, Emergency Roration would | |||
be required. Additionally, in Modes 1 & 2, SDM is required to control the reactivity transient | |||
associated with a stem line break. However, it is not required during transient conditions, allowing | |||
the 2 hours to restore rod position. | |||
La. | |||
Plausibic since if this condition existed for 2 hours, instead of 20 minutes, Emergency Boration would | |||
he rcyuired. However, it is not required during transient conditions, ailowing the 2 hours to restore | |||
rod position. | |||
Emergency boration is required if SDM is not met. Criticality at steady spate conditions is considered | |||
to he a loss of SDM. In Motlcs I & 2, SDM is required to control the reactikity transient associated | |||
with 3 steam line break. | |||
Plausihle since Emergency boration is required if SI)M is not met. Criticality at steady state | |||
conditions is considered to he a loss of SDM. However, the concern for an inadvertent dilution is | |||
related to a shutdown condition. | |||
d c. | |||
d. | |||
ICKJLTY ANALYSIS: | |||
COMPREHENSIVE / ANALYSIS | |||
UIFFICULIY RATIXG: | |||
2 | |||
EXPL,AN,4IION: | |||
KNOWLEIIGE i RECALL | |||
Knowledge of the requirements for initiating Emergency Boration and the bases | |||
for these actions. | |||
Post Validation Revisioii | |||
IIarris NRC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
QCESTION: | QCESTION: | ||
Given the following conditions: | 3 | ||
e | Given the following conditions: | ||
e | |||
* CSIP 1.4-SA is operating. | |||
o | |||
Ihe plant has been operating at I@@% power for the past three (3) months. | |||
CSIP 1B-SB has just been restored to a normal alignment following maintenance on | |||
Which ofthe following is the most likely cause of these CSIP | the pump impeller. | ||
When CSIP 1B-SR is started the operator notes that suction pressure appears nornial, | |||
while discharge pressure, discharge flow, and pump current are oscillating. | |||
o | |||
Which ofthe following is the most likely cause of these CSIP 1 B-SI3 indications? | |||
a. Inadequate venting was performed during clearance restoration | |||
b. The CSIP 1B-SB discharge valve was inadvertently left closed during clearance | |||
ANSWER: | restoration | ||
c. | |||
A failure of the CSIP 1B-SB miniflow isolation valve has resulted in gas binding | |||
(I. A failure ofthe (XI IR-SB miniflow isolation valve has resulted in all pump | |||
flow being recirculated to the VCT | |||
ANSWER: | |||
a. inadequate venting was perfonned during clearance restoration | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Haris NRC Written Examination | |||
Senior Rnctor Operator | |||
Data Sheets | |||
QtXSTION NUMBER: 3 | QtXSTION NUMBER: 3 | ||
TIEWGROUP: | |||
2: I | |||
KA IMPORTANCE: | |||
RO | |||
SRO | |||
3.8 | |||
IOCFRS CowrmT: | |||
41(b) | |||
43fb) | |||
5 | |||
EL\\: | |||
006A2.04 | |||
Ability to (a) predict the impacts ofthe following malfunctions or operations on the ICCS; and (b) based | |||
on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences ofthose | |||
inalfiinctions or operations: Improper discharge pressure | |||
OBJECTIVE: | |||
AOP-3.2-4 | |||
Given a set of plant conditions and a copy of AOP-002, determine if the possibility of gas hinding the | |||
CSIPs exists and the coirectiue action to be taken | |||
DEVELOPMEST REFERENCES: | |||
OP-IO7 | |||
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT: | |||
None | |||
SOEK 97-1 | |||
~ | |||
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS: | QUESTION SOURCE: | ||
NEW | |||
SIC~MFICANTLY MODIFIED | |||
DIRECT | |||
BARK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED I DIRECT: | |||
Rew | |||
NRC EXAM HISTORY: | |||
None | |||
DISTRACTOW SI!STIFPCACTBON (CORRECT ANSWER dd): | |||
d a. Gas binding o f a pump results in lower than expected pressure, flow, and current. Likely cause is | |||
improper venting of pump when restoring from post maintenance activities. | |||
b. Plausible since improper alignment would result in low flow and current, but a closed discharge V d h C | |||
would cause discharge pressure to be high. | |||
Plausible since gas binding is cause of these indications, but will not occur as a result of pump recirc | |||
valve being open. | |||
d. Plausible since a failed open recirc valve will cause indicated flow to be low since flow is rneasu~ud | |||
dowstreatn of the recirc valve. hut discharge pressure and current would be at or near normal. | |||
e. | |||
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS: | |||
COMPREEIENSIVE i ANALYSIS | |||
DIFFICULTY RATING: | |||
3 | |||
EXPLANATION: | |||
KNOWLEDGE i RECALL | |||
Must analyze given pump conditiuns to determitie failure mode and then | |||
determine likely cause of gas binding of the pump | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Harris NKC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
QUESTION: | QUESTION: | ||
Given the following conditions: | 4 | ||
e | Given the following conditions: | ||
e | |||
e | |||
The unit is operating at 100% power, with C.;ontrol Bank D rods at 215 steps. | |||
ALB 13-7-1, ROD CONIROI, URGENT ALARM, is in AIAKM due to a failure in | |||
Which of the following actions should the Reactor Operator be directed to take'? | Power Cabinet I AC. | ||
Rod Control is in MAN. | |||
A turbine trip occurs, but the Reactor f'ails to trip either automatically or manually. | |||
o | |||
e- | |||
ANSWER: | Which of the following actions should the Reactor Operator be directed to take'? | ||
a. Place the Rod Control BANK SELECTOR in AUTO and allow rods to itisett | |||
b. Maintain the Rod Control K4NK SELECTOR in MAN and manually insert rods | |||
c. | |||
Place the Kod Control BANK SELECTOK in RANK U and manually insert rods | |||
d. Maintain rods at 2 15 steps | |||
ANSWER: | |||
d. Maintain rods at 21 5 steps | |||
Post Validation Kevision | |||
IIarris NRC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
Data Sheets | |||
QUESTION NUMBER: 4 | QUESTION NUMBER: 4 | ||
TIEWGROUP: | |||
2 2 | |||
KA IMPORTANCE: | |||
RO | |||
SRO | |||
4.0 | |||
10CFR55 CONTENT: | |||
4B(h) | |||
43(b) | |||
5 | |||
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT: | KA: | ||
001G2.4.h | |||
Knowledge of symptom based E01' mitigation strategies. (Control Rod Drive) | |||
OBJECTIVE: | |||
DISTRACTOR JLSTIFICACTION (CORRECI' ANSW'ER +d): | EOP-3.19-4 | ||
Given a set of conditions during EOP implementation, determine the correct response or required action | |||
based upon the EOP 1.Jser's Guide general information | |||
z. | |||
Use of "Bank Select" during an AI'WS | |||
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES: | |||
E( )P-USERS GUIDE | |||
EOP-FRP-S. I | |||
4 | REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT: | ||
None | |||
QuESTIcrN SOUIPCE: | |||
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS: | NEW' | ||
SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED | |||
DIRECT | |||
BANK NUM5ER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED / DIRECT | |||
New | |||
NRC EXAM EPIS'IORY: | |||
None | |||
DISTRACTOR JLSTIFICACTION (CORRECI' ANSW'ER +d): | |||
a. Plausible since this is an RNO action for a failure of the reactor to trip. but will not be successful due | |||
to the urgent failure in rod control. | |||
b. Plausible since this is an RNO action for a failure of the reactor to trip, hut will not be successful due | |||
to the urgent failure in rod control. | |||
Plausible since this will allow Bank D rods to tmwe inward, and is the only method of iuserting rods | |||
with the rod coutrol failure, hut should not be used due to the potential to cause unanalyzed flux | |||
shapes. | |||
4 d. Due to the urgent failure, rods will not nmve in AIJTO or MAN, Although they urill move in BANK | |||
D with this particular failure, niovitig r d s in individual banks may result in unanalyzed flux shapes | |||
which could result in hrl damage. | |||
c. | |||
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS: | |||
Q~OMPRFXBENSIVE | |||
/ ANALYSIS | |||
DIFFICULTY RATING: | |||
3 | |||
EXPLANATION: | |||
KNOWLEDGE I RECALL | |||
Must aualyze the effect of an urgent rod control failure aid then apply the | |||
failure results to the plant conditions to determine the proper actions | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Harris NRC Written Examination | |||
Seniot Reactor Operator | |||
QUESTION: | QUESTION: | ||
Four Operators worked the following schedule in the Control Room over the past six | 5 | ||
days: | Four Operators worked the following schedule in the Control Room over the past six | ||
I- | days: | ||
worked before or after this period.) | I-IOI JRS WORKED (Shift turnover lime not included. Do NOT assume any hours | ||
worked before or after this period.) | |||
OPERATOR DAY B DAY 2 DAY 3 DAY 4 DAY 5 DAY6 | |||
1 | |||
I 0 | |||
14 | |||
Which of the operators would be permitted to work a 12-hour shift on Day 7 W'IIHO1iT | off | ||
requiring permission to exceed nonnal | 12 | ||
12 | |||
12 | |||
2 | |||
14 | |||
ANSWER: | 12 | ||
14 | |||
10 | |||
off | |||
11 | |||
3 | |||
off | |||
off | |||
off | |||
13 | |||
I 1 | |||
14 | |||
4 | |||
I 1 | |||
13 | |||
14 | |||
off | |||
I I | |||
12 | |||
Which of the operators would be permitted to work a 12-hour shift on Day 7 W'IIHO1iT | |||
requiring permission to exceed nonnal owtime limits? | |||
a. | |||
Operator 1 | |||
b. Operator 2 | |||
c. | |||
Operator3 | |||
d. Operator 4 | |||
ANSWER: | |||
a. Operator 1 | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Harris NRC Written Examination | |||
Senior Keactor Operator | |||
Data Sheets | |||
QUESTION NCMBER: S | QUESTION NCMBER: S | ||
TIEWGROIJP: | |||
3 | |||
KA IMPORTANCE: | |||
RO | |||
SRO | |||
4.0 | |||
lQCFR55 CONTENT: | |||
41@) | |||
43(h) | |||
5 | |||
KA: | |||
2.1.2 | |||
Knowledge of operator responsibilities during all modes ofplant operation | |||
OBJECTIVE: | |||
PP-2.0-SI | |||
$FATE the requirements contained in Administrative Controls Section, including requirenients for | |||
the following: | |||
e | |||
Unit staff, including overtime limitations | |||
I)E\\ELCPPMENT REFERENCES: | |||
AP-012 | |||
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPIKANT: | |||
None | |||
~ | |||
QUESTION SOIJRCE: | |||
NEW | |||
SIGNIFICAIVTLY MODIFIED | |||
DIRECT | |||
BANK NUMBF:R FOR S1GNIFICANTI.Y RIODIEIED / DIRECT: | |||
Robinson NRC 200 I | |||
NRC EXAM IIISTORY: | |||
None | |||
DISTRACTOR JI;STIFICACTICPN (CORRECT ANSWER dd): | |||
d a. Working a 12 hour shift on Day 7 would result in this operator working 24 hours out of 18, and 72 | |||
hours in I days, both of which are permissible. | |||
b. Plausible since this operator would not e?tc~ed the 24 hours out of 48 limit and has had a recent day | |||
off, but would work 73 hours in 7 days which exceeds limit. | |||
E. Plausible since this operator would not exceed the 42 hours in 41 day limit and has several recent days | |||
off, but wouid work more than 2.1 hours in 48 which exceeds limit. | |||
(8. | |||
Ilausible since this operator would riot exceed the 24 hours out of48 limit arid has had a recent day | |||
off. but would work 73 hours in 7 days which exceeds limit. | |||
DIFFECXJLTY AIVALYSBS: | |||
COMPREHENSIVE / ANALYSIS | |||
DIFFICULTY RATING: | |||
3 | |||
EXPLANATION: | |||
KNOWLEDGE I RECALL | |||
Kequired to compare given data to administrative litnits to dctermine which | |||
operator would remain within acceptable overtime limits | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Hairis NRC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Clperator | |||
QBJESTIBN: | QBJESTIBN: | ||
Given the following conditions: | 6 | ||
e | Given the following conditions: | ||
e | |||
e | |||
A Reactor Trip with SI occurs. | |||
The operators perform the immediate action steps, verify ECCS flow, and check | |||
SG levels are < 25% and the required AFW ilow cannot be established, so the | |||
opcrators enter FOP-ERP-H. 1, Response to Loss of Secondary Heat Sink. | |||
Which of the following actions is to be taken? | MCS pressure is 175 psig. | ||
Ail SG pressures are between 300 psig and 350 psig. | |||
AFW Oow. | |||
e | |||
Which of the following actions is to be taken? | |||
a. | |||
b. | |||
c. | |||
d . | |||
ANSWER: | Continue in EOP-FRP-H. 1 since FOP-FRP-H. 1 has a higher priority than PATH-I | ||
and attempt to establish AFW or Main Feedwater flow. | |||
(ontintie in FOP-FRP-11. I since EOP-FKP-H.1 has a higher priority than PATH-I | |||
and initiate KCS feed and bleed. | |||
Keturn to E,OP-PATII-i at the step that was in effect since a secondary heat sink is | |||
NOT required following a large break LOCA. | |||
Return to FOP-PATH- I at Entry Point C since a secondary heat sink is NOT | |||
required following a large break LOCA. | |||
ANSWER: | |||
c. | |||
Return to IiOP-PA?II-l at the step that was in elfect since a secondary heat sink is | |||
KOT required following a large break LOCA. | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Ifarris NKC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
P d M $lieetS | |||
QIJE.:s'I'ION NUMBER 6 | QIJE.:s'I'ION NUMBER 6 | ||
TIEWGROIJP: | |||
lil | |||
EL4 IMPORTANCE: | |||
RO | |||
SRO | |||
4.0 | |||
10CFR55 CO?XENT: | |||
4P(b) | |||
43(b) | |||
5 | |||
ai: 00001 1G2.4.6 | |||
Knowledge of symptom based EOP mitigation strategies. (Large Break 1,OCA) | |||
OBJECTIVE: | |||
EOP-3.11-4 | |||
Given the following EOP steps, notes, and cautions, describe the associated basis | |||
e. | |||
Requirements fur a heat sink (W. I) | |||
DEVE1,OPMENI' REFERENCES: | |||
E0P-FRP-K. 1 | |||
REFEKEBCES SUPPI.1F.D TO APPLICANT: | |||
None | |||
QrJKSTION SOURCE: | |||
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS: | NEW | ||
SIGNIF'ICANT1,Y MODIFIED | |||
DIRECT | |||
BASK NUMBER FOR S K | |||
CANTLY MODIFIED / DIRECT: | |||
EOP-3. I 1-KI 003 | |||
NRC EXAM HISTORY: | |||
Sone | |||
1)PSTRACTOH JCJSTIFICACTION (CORRECT ANSWER d'd): | |||
a. Plausible since these are actions that are taken upon entry iuto FRP-H. 1, but a secondary heat sink | |||
would not be required with RC'S pressure <' SG pressure. | |||
b. Plausible since these are actions that might be taken upon entry into FRP-H.I. but a secondary heat | |||
sink would not be required with RCS pressure 'c SG pressure. | |||
Since RCS pressure is less than S<i pressure, a secondary heat sink is not required since the SG would | |||
act as a heat source rather than a heat sink. Return is to procedure and step in effect. | |||
d. Plausible since RCS pressure is less than SG pressure and a secondary heat sink is not required. | |||
Rcturn is to procedure and step in effect. not Entry Point C. | |||
I | |||
V c. | |||
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS: | |||
COMPREIIESSIVE ! | |||
ANALYSIS | |||
DIFIWIILTY RATING: | |||
3 | |||
EXPLANATION: | |||
KNOWLEDGE / RECALL | |||
Must interpret tkst that a secondary heat sink is not required based on RCS | |||
pressure being grater than SG pressure and then must recognize the entry point | |||
conditions for returning to PATII- I | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Harris NKC Written Fxamination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
QUESTION: | QUESTION: 4 | ||
Given the following conditions: | Given the following conditions: | ||
B | B The Reactor has been taken critical and power is being increased. | ||
m | m | ||
m | NIS iR channels N35 and N36 are both indicating 5 x I O I ' amps. | ||
a | m | ||
NIS SK chmncl ~3 I is indicating 8 x 10' cps. | |||
Power should he stabilized ~. | a | ||
Due to improper adjustn~ent ofthe high voltage setting, NIS SR channel N32 is | |||
indicating 7 x lo4 cps. | |||
Power should he stabilized ~. | |||
a. | |||
ANSWER: | at or above | ||
amps, and the SR IIig.11 Flux trip should then be blocked. | |||
h. | |||
at the current power level, and the SR High Flux trip should then be blocked. | |||
c. at or above | |||
amps, but the SR High Flux trip should NOT be blocked. | |||
d. at the current power level, hut the SR High Flux trip should NOT be blocked. | |||
ANSWER: | |||
d. at the current power level. but the SR IIigh Flux trip should NOT be blocked. | |||
Post Validation Kevision | |||
IIarris NKC; Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
Data Sheets | |||
QUESTION NIJI\BBER: 7 | QUESTION NIJI\\BBER: 7 | ||
TIENGROUP: | |||
I i2 | |||
KA IMPORTANCE: | |||
RO | |||
SRO | |||
2.9 | |||
LOCFR55 CONTENT: | |||
41(b) | |||
43(b) | |||
5 | |||
Kh: | |||
000032AA2.09 | |||
Ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply to the Loss of Source Range Nuclear | |||
Instrumentation: Effect of impropcr HV setting | |||
DISTRACTOR JUST1FIC:ACTLON (CORRECT ANSWER d'd): | OBJECTIVE: | ||
GP-3.4-1 | |||
llecognize off-normal conditions during a reactor start-up, including | |||
a. | |||
Availability of excore nuclear instrunientation channels (SR, IR, PR) | |||
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES: | |||
(31'404 | |||
d | REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICAXT: | ||
None | |||
ALB-012-4-5 | |||
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS: | QUESTION SOURCE: | ||
NEW | |||
SIGNIFICANTLY MOIXFIED | |||
DIRECT | |||
BANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED / DIRECT: | |||
New | |||
NKC EXAM HISTORY: | |||
None | |||
DISTRACTOR JUST1FIC:ACTLON (CORRECT ANSWER d'd): | |||
a. Plausible since power must he increased above 10 " amps before blocking trips, but increasing power | |||
to this level will result in SR high flux trip. | |||
b. Plausible since power cannot be increased above 10." amps, but the block of the SR high flux trip is | |||
interlocked at this power levei. | |||
Plausible since the SR high flux trip is not permitted to be blocked without at least 1 decade of overlap | |||
between SR and IR, but increasing power above Io"' amps will result in a SR high flux trip. | |||
d (8. | |||
Less than 1 decade of overlap exists between SK and IR channel before trip would occur. Increasing | |||
power to allow blucking SR would result in trip before reaching power ievsl and attempting to block | |||
at current power level will not be successful. | |||
c. | |||
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS: | |||
COMPREIIENSIVE / ANALYSIS | |||
DIFPICIJ1,TY RATING: | |||
3 | |||
EXPIANATION: | |||
KNOWLEDGE /RECALL | |||
Must determine that increasing power above 10~'o | |||
amp will result in a reactor | |||
trip due to SR high flux, and that atienipting to block the SK high flux trip | |||
below 10-'Carnps will not he successful. Required tu not block SK high flux trip | |||
if e: 1 decade of overlap exists. | |||
Post Validation Kevision | |||
Harris NRC Written Examination | |||
Scnior Reactor Operator | |||
QUESTION: | QUESTION: | ||
Given the following conditions: | 8 | ||
e | Given the following conditions: | ||
e | |||
e | |||
e | |||
Which of the following actions should be taken? | |||
FOP-FRP-S. I ~ Kesponse to Nuclear Power GeneratiodATWS. is being | |||
implemented. | |||
An SI actuation has occurred. | |||
l h e Foldout page is applicable. | |||
a. | |||
b. | |||
c. | |||
d. | |||
Continue with IIOP-FRP-S. 1 while verif14ng proper operation of safeguard | |||
ANSWER | equipment | ||
Continue with EOP-FKP-S. 1 until the reactor is tripped or made subcritical, then | |||
immediately exit to FOP-PATII-1 | |||
Transition to EOP-PATH-1 and verify all automatic actions required for an SI | |||
have occurred, then return to FOP-FRP-S. 1 only when directed by PATH- I | |||
Reset SI and FW isolation iis soon as possible to restore feed flow to the steam | |||
generators, then continue with EOP-FKP-S. 1 | |||
ANSWER | |||
a. | |||
Continue with FOP-FRP-S. 1 while verifying proper operation of safeguard | |||
equipment | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Harris NKC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
Datit Sheets | |||
QIJESTION NUiV1BE.R: 8 | |||
TEER/GROUP: | |||
2/ | |||
1 | |||
KA IMPORTANCE: | |||
RO | |||
SHO | |||
4.0 | |||
lOCFR55 CONTENT: | |||
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES: | 41(b) | ||
43@) | |||
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT: | 5 | ||
QUESTION SOURCE: | #A: | ||
0 12G2.4.6 | |||
Knowledge of symptom based EOP mitigation strategies. (Keactor Protection) | |||
DISTRAClOR JUSr1FIB:ACTION (CORRECT ANSWER dd): | OBJECTIVE: | ||
> | EOP-3.15 | ||
Describe the purpose of the following EOPs including type of event for which they were designed and the | |||
major actions perfomled | |||
- FRP-S. 1 | |||
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES: | |||
EOP-FRP-S. I | |||
EOP Users Guide | |||
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT: | |||
None | |||
QUESTION SOURCE: | |||
NF:W | |||
SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED | |||
DIRECT | |||
fiOI-3.15 02 1 | |||
Harris NRC 2000 | |||
BANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED i 1)IRE:CT: | |||
NRC EXAM HISTORY: | |||
DISTRAClOR JUSr1FIB:ACTION (CORRECT ANSWER dd): | |||
> a. | |||
I | |||
If a safety injection occurs while implementing FW-S. 1, proper operation of SI equipment is veritkd | |||
while continuing with FRP-S.I. | |||
b. Plausible since PATII-I provides instructions for a response lo safety injection, but FRP-S. I must be | |||
performed until completion. | |||
Plausible since PATH-I provides instructions for a response to safety iujection. but FRP-S. I must be | |||
performed until completion. | |||
d. Plausible sirice a safety injection will result in a loss of MFW: hut AFW flow is capable of providing | |||
niininium required flow. | |||
c. | |||
I c u c r Y ANALYSIS: | |||
COMPREHENSIVE i ANALYSIS | |||
DIFFICULTY RATING: | |||
2 | |||
EXPLANATION: | |||
mOWLEDGE / RECALL | |||
Knowledge of procedural requirements in EPP-FRP-S. I | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
IIairis NRC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
QUESTION: | QUESTION: | ||
Given the following conditions: | 9 | ||
* The plant is in Mode 3 with all Shutdown Rods withdrawn. | Given the following conditions: | ||
* | |||
e | |||
Which of the following actions is to be taken? | The plant is in Mode 3 with all Shutdown Rods withdrawn. | ||
All power is lost to the Digital Rod Position Indication display and CANNOT be | |||
restored. | |||
Which of the following actions is to be taken? | |||
a. | |||
Verify that all Shutdown Bank Rods are fully withdrawn using Detnand Position | |||
Indication | |||
ANSWER: | b. Determine that all Shutdown Bank Rods are fully withdrawn using the movable | ||
incore detectors | |||
c. | |||
Commence a boration ofthe RCS to ensure adequate Shutdown Margin | |||
d. Open the Reactor Trip Breakers | |||
ANSWER: | |||
d. Open the Reactor Trip Breakers | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Ilanis NRC: Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
Data Sheets | |||
QtJESTION NUMBER: 9 | QtJESTION NUMBER: 9 | ||
TIEWUGROIJP: | |||
211 | |||
KA IMPORTANCE: | |||
RO | |||
SRO | |||
3.6 | |||
POCFR55 COXTENT: | |||
41(b) | |||
43(b) | |||
5 | |||
KA: 01442.02 | |||
Ability to (a) predict the impacts ofthe following malfunctions or operations on the RF'IS; and (b) based | |||
QUESTION SOIJRCE: | on those on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those | ||
malfunctions or operations: E.oss of power to the RPIS | |||
OBJECTWE: | |||
RODCS-3. I -K4 | |||
Given a copy of 'Technical Specifications and a plant mode, determine if rod position indication | |||
components and actual rod positions meet their Limiting Conditions for Operation; if they do not, then the | |||
applicable ACTION statements | |||
DEVELOPMENT REFEKE:NCES: | |||
TS 3.1.3.3 | |||
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT: | |||
None | |||
QUESTION SOIJRCE: | |||
NEW | |||
SIGNPFICANT1,Y MODIFIED | |||
DIRECT | |||
BANK NUMREK FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED ! | |||
DIHECT: | |||
New | |||
NRC EXAM HISTORY: | |||
None | |||
DISTRACTOR JUSTIFICACTION (CORRECT ANSWER d'd): | |||
a. Plausible since this would be required in the event ofa loss ofa single indication while operating in | |||
Mode 1 or 2, but u-ith both indications lost in Mode 3 the Reactor Trip Breakers are to be opened. | |||
b. Plausible since this would he required in the event of a loss of a single indication while operating in | |||
Mode 1 or 2, but with both indications lost in Mode 3 the Reactor Trip Breakers are to be opened. | |||
r. Plausible since loss of indication of L N P I may lead to belief that SDM cannot be verified, which | |||
would require Emergency Boratiou. | |||
With both IIRPI indications inoperable in Mode 3,4, or 5, TS requires that the Reactor Trip Breakers | |||
be opened imrtiediately. | |||
d (1. | |||
HCULTY AR'ALYSBS: | |||
COMPREHENSIVE / ANALYSIS | |||
DIFFICTJL'I'Y K4TING: | |||
2 | |||
EXPLANATION: | |||
KNOWLEDGE / RECALL | |||
Knowledge of Tech Spec immediate action requirements in the event of a loss | |||
of both DRPI indications | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
IImis KR( Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
QUESTION: | QUESTION: | ||
.4 licensed Reactor Operator has failed to meet the required number of hours this past | 10 | ||
calendar quarter to maintain an active license. | .4 licensed Reactor Operator has failed to meet the required number of hours this past | ||
Assuming all other requirements have been met to activate the license, which of the | calendar quarter to maintain an active license. | ||
following watches completed under instruction would satisfy the requirement to allow | Assuming all other requirements have been met to activate the license, which of the | ||
activation of the license? | following watches completed under instruction would satisfy the requirement to allow | ||
activation of the license? | |||
a. | |||
24 hours as the Control Operator during Mode 5 AND 36 hours as the Control | |||
Operator during Mode 4 | |||
b. | |||
45 hours as the Balance of Plant Operator during Mode 5 AKD 12 hours as the | |||
ANSWER: | (ontrol Operator during Mode 4 | ||
c. 40 hours as the Control Operator during hfode 5 | |||
d. 40 hours as the Balance of Plant Operator during Mode 4 | |||
ANSWER: | |||
d. 40 hours as the Balance of Plant Operator during Mode 4 | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Hatris NRC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
Data Sheets | |||
QUEs'rION NUBIBER: I0 | QUEs'rION NUBIBER: I0 | ||
T%ER/GROUP: | |||
3 | |||
KA IMPORTANCE: | |||
RQ | |||
SRO | |||
3.8 | |||
80CFR55 CONIENI': | |||
41(b) | |||
43(b) | |||
5 | |||
KA: | |||
2.1.1 | |||
Knowledge of conduct of operations requirements | |||
OBJECTIVE: | |||
PP-3.1-1 | |||
Given a situation, STATE whether or not an off-going operator may be relieved during the shiti turnover | |||
process | |||
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES: | |||
<)?vfM-OO 1 | |||
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICAWI': | |||
X m e | |||
QUESTBOiV SOURCE: | |||
NEW | |||
SIGN%FICANI%,Y | |||
MODIFIE:I) | |||
OR SIGNIFICANTLY 1C1ODIPIE:D / DIRECT: | |||
NRC EXAM HISTORY: | |||
None | |||
DISTRACTOR JUSTIFICACI'ION (CORRECT AXSWER .v"d): | |||
a. Plausible since this exceeds the required 40 hours for the CO or BOP position. but only those hours | |||
when the plant is above 200°F are acceptable. | |||
b. Plausible since this exceeds the required 40 hours for the C:O or BOP position. but only those hours | |||
when the plant is above 200°F are acceptable. | |||
c. | |||
Plausible since this meets the required 40 hours for the C:O or DOP position and this has the most | |||
hours in the CO position, but only those hours when the plant is above 200"I" are acceptable. | |||
'/ | |||
d. 40 hours are required in either the CO or HOP position when the plant is above 2.00"F | |||
DIE'FBCCLTY ANALYSIS: | |||
F KNOW'1,EDGE / RECALI. | |||
COMPREHENSIVE / ANALYSIS | |||
DKFFICULTY RATING: | |||
2 | |||
EXPLANATION: | |||
Must recall requitxment for activating an inactive license from OMM-OO I | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
IIarris NKC Writtan Examination | |||
Senior Radctor Operatoi | |||
QUESTION: | QUESTION: | ||
Following a loss of off-site power during recovery from a SGTR, the crew is required to | 1 1 | ||
transition from EPP-019, Post SGTR Cooldown Using Steam Dump, to either: | Following a loss of off-site power during recovery from a SGTR, the crew is required to | ||
e | transition from EPP-019, Post SGTR Cooldown Using Steam Dump, to either: | ||
e | e | ||
Which ofthe following describe how RCS and SG pressure contrd in EPP-OI 7 compares | e | ||
to that in EPP-0 18? | Which ofthe following describe how RCS and SG pressure contrd in EPP-OI 7 compares | ||
to that in EPP-0 18? | |||
EPP-017, Post SGTR Cooldown Using Backfill | |||
EPP-018, Post SGTR Cooldown CJsing Blowdown | |||
a. | |||
e | |||
e | |||
EPP-Oi7 maintains RCS pressure below the niptured SG pressure | |||
EPP-01 8 maintains KCS pressure below the ruptured S G pressure | |||
ANSWER: | b. | ||
e | |||
m | |||
EPP-017 maintains RCS pressure below the ruptured S G pressure | |||
EPP-OI 8 maintains RCS pressure the same as the ruptured SG pressure | |||
c. | |||
e | |||
e | |||
EPP-017 maintains RCS pressure the same as the ruptured S G pressure | |||
EPP-018 maintains RCS pressure below the ruptured S G pressure | |||
d. | |||
e | |||
e | |||
EPE-017 maintains RCS pressure the sanie as the ruptured SCi pressure | |||
EPP-018 niaintains RCS pressure the same as the ruptured SG pressure | |||
ANSWER: | |||
b. | |||
e | |||
e | |||
EPP-017 maintains RCS pressure below the ruptured SG pressure | |||
EPP-018 inaintains KCS pressure the same as the ruptured SG pressure | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Hams NRC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
Data Sheets | |||
QILJESTHON NUMBER: I 1 | QILJESTHON NUMBER: | ||
I 1 | |||
TIER/GROUP: | |||
i!I | |||
KA IMPORTANCE: | |||
RO | |||
SRO | |||
4.4 | |||
10CFRSS CONTENT: | |||
41(b) | |||
43(b) | |||
5 | |||
KA: | |||
0OtJ038EA2.08 | |||
Ability to determine or interpret the following as they apply to a SWR: Viable ahnatives for placing | |||
plant in safe condition when condenser is not available | |||
OBJECTIVE: | |||
EOP-1.4- I | |||
Describe the purpose of the following EOPs including the type of event for which they were designed and | |||
the major actions perfornied | |||
- EPP-0 I7 | |||
- EPP-0 18 | |||
- EPP-0 19 | |||
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES: | |||
EPP-0 17 | |||
EPP-0 18 | |||
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT: | |||
Nonc | |||
QIJESTION SOURCE: | |||
DIFFICII1,TY ANALYSIS: | SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED | ||
DIRECT | |||
CAN11,Y MODIFIED ,! DIRECT: | |||
-3.4 010 | |||
NRC EXAM HISTORY: | |||
Harris 2002 | |||
DISTRACTOR .JUSTIFIC:ACTION (CORRECT ANSWER dd): | |||
a. | |||
Plausible since EPP-017 maintains pressnre below ruptured SG pressure, but EPP-018 maintains | |||
pressure the Same as the ruptured SG pressure. | |||
EPP-017 maintains pressure below S(i pressure to allow backfill from the SG to the RCS, while EPP- | |||
018 maintains pressure the same as SG pressure to niininiize SG leakage. | |||
c. | |||
Plausible since either EPP-0 14 or EPP-0 I 8 maiutains pressuix below SG pressure and either EPP-0 I7 | |||
or EPP-018 maintains pressure the same as SG pressure, hut this distracter has the correct condition | |||
reveresed. | |||
d. Plausible since EPP-0 I8 maintains pressure the same as the ruptured SG pressure, but P M 17 | |||
maintains pressure below ruptured SG pressure. | |||
d b. | |||
DIFFICII1,TY ANALYSIS: | |||
n | |||
COMPREIIENSPVE / ANALYSIS | |||
KNOW12EDGE IRECALI, | |||
DIFFICULTY RATIXTG: | |||
3 | |||
EXPLANATION: | |||
Knowledge of differeut mitigation strategies for EPP-017 and EPP-0 I8 | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
IIarris NRC Written Exsmination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
QI!ESTION: | QI!ESTION: | ||
A I.OCA occurred several hours ago. Only one ( i ) Containment Spray Pump is running | 12 | ||
due to actions taken in EPP-0 12, Loss of Emergency Coolant Recirculation. | A I.OCA occurred several hours ago. Only one ( i ) Containment Spray Pump is running | ||
A transition has just been made to FRP-J. 1, Response to High Containment Pressure. | due to actions taken in EPP-0 12, Loss of Emergency Coolant Recirculation. | ||
Containment Pressure is 14 psig. | A transition has just been made to FRP-J. 1, Response to High Containment Pressure. | ||
Whish of the following actions should be taken? | Containment Pressure is 14 psig. | ||
Whish of the following actions should be taken? | |||
a. | |||
b. | |||
C. | |||
d. | |||
Start the second Containment Spray Pump if Containment pressure docs NOi | |||
decrease below 10 psig before exiting FRP-.I. 1. | |||
ANSWER: | Start the second Containment Spray Pump since pressure is ahove 10 psig. | ||
Continue operation with one Containment Spray Pump regardless of any increase | |||
in Containment pressure. | |||
Continue operation with one Containment Spray Pump unless Containment | |||
pressure begins increasing, then start the second pump. | |||
ANSWER: | |||
c. Continue operation with one Containnlent Spray Pump regardless of any increase | |||
in Containment pressure. | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Harris NRC Written Exanunation | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
Data Sheets | |||
QUESTION NUMBER | QUESTION NUMBER I2 | ||
TIEWGRODP: | |||
112 | |||
MA IMPORTANCE: | |||
RO | |||
SRO | |||
3.8 | |||
lOCPR55 CONTENT: | |||
41(b) | |||
43(b) | |||
5 | |||
KA: | |||
WE13E42.2 | |||
Ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply to the (High Containment Pressure) | |||
Adherence to appropriate procedures and operation within the limitations i ~ i | |||
the facilitys license and | |||
DISTRACTOR JUSTPFICACTION (CORRECT ANSWVEK dd): | amendments | ||
OBJECTIVE: | |||
EOP-3.13-5 | |||
4 | Given the following EOP steps, notes, and cautions, describe the assuciated basis: b. CNMI spray | ||
operation (EPP-012 or FRP-J.l) | |||
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES: EOP-FRP-J. 1 | |||
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT: | |||
None | |||
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS: | QUESTION SOURCE: | ||
NEW | |||
SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED | |||
DIRECT | |||
BANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY B¶ODIFIED / 1)IRECT: | |||
EIOP-3.13-R4 008 | |||
NRC EXAM HISTORY: | |||
None | |||
DISTRACTOR JUSTPFICACTION (CORRECT ANSWVEK dd): | |||
a. Plausible since this would be a normal action directed by FRP-J.1 | |||
&. | |||
Plausible since this would be a normal action directed by FRP-J. 1 | |||
4 c. EPP-012 directs the operators to run Containment Spray Pumps based upon Containment pressure and | |||
Fan Cooler operation. These actions are taken to minimize RWST depletion. This configuration is to | |||
he maintained even if FRP-J. I is itnplernented. | |||
68. Plausible since woiild better serve the intent of EPP-0 12. but wuuld be contradictory to the inlenr uf | |||
FRP-J. 1 which bas a higher priority concerning the operation ofthe Spray Pumps. | |||
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS: | |||
COMPREHENSWE / ANALYSIS | |||
DIFFLCULTY RATING: | |||
3 | |||
EXPLANATION: | |||
0 ELVOWLEDGE / RECALL | |||
Must compare the relative actions in the 2 procedures and make a judgement of | |||
which condition takes precedent | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
IIarris NRC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
QUESTIQN: | QUESTIQN: | ||
During operation at 100%power, an inadvertent SI occurs on 'B' Train ONLY. | 13 | ||
Which of the following actions is required? | During operation at 100% power, an inadvertent SI occurs on 'B' Train ONLY. | ||
Which of the following actions is required? | |||
a. Manually actuate SJ on 'A' Train and continue in PATH-1 | |||
b. Continue in PATH-I noting which 'A' Train ESF equipment is NOT running | |||
c. | |||
Start ONLY the 'A' Train of ESI equipment for which the redundant 'B' 'Train | |||
ANSWER: | cyuipnient failed | ||
d. Transition directly to EI'P-008, SI Termination | |||
ANSWER: | |||
a. | |||
Manually actuate SI on 'A' Train and continue in PATH-I | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
IIarris NRC: Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
Data Sheets | |||
QUESTION NUMBER: 13 | QUESTION NUMBER: 13 | ||
TIEWGROIJP: | |||
2: I | |||
KA IMPORTANCE: | |||
RO | |||
SRO | |||
4.6 | |||
10CFR55 CONTENT: | |||
41@) | |||
43(b) | |||
5 | |||
ICI: 013.42.01 | |||
Ability to (a) predict the impacts ofthe following malfunctions or operations on the ESFAS; and (b) | |||
based on those predictions, use procedures to correct. control, or mitigate the consequences of those | |||
malfunctions or operations: LOCA | |||
OBJECTIVE: | |||
IE-3. IO-K4 | |||
Describe the expected operator actions associated with an imminent RPS or ESFAS actuation | |||
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES: | |||
EOP User's Chide | |||
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT: | |||
None | |||
QtJESTlON SOURCE: | |||
NEW | |||
SIGNIFKANTLY MODIFBED | |||
DIRECT | |||
BANK NIMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED / DIRECT: | |||
IE-3. IO-R4 001 | |||
NRC EXAM IIISTORY: | |||
Harris 2 0 0 | |||
DISTRACTOR JUSTIPICACTION (CORRECT ANSWER d'd): | |||
4 a. Preferred method of manual actuation although it would be acceptable to start / reposition all | |||
equipment which would be actuated regardless of the perceived need since diagnostics have not yet | |||
been performed. | |||
b. Plausible since only a single train actuation is analyzed, but efforts are to be made to initiate both | |||
trains. | |||
Piausible since starting equipment as needed would provide adequate protection, but since diahqIoStiCS | |||
have not yet been completed the equipment required may not yet be known. | |||
d. Plausible since one of the goals following an inadvertent SI is to terminate SI as soon as criteria arc | |||
niet to prevent overfilling / pressurizing the RCS, but procedures are written assuming both trains | |||
started. | |||
c. | |||
ICULTY ANALYSIS: | |||
COMPREHENSIVE / ANALYSIS | |||
DIPFICI!LTY RATING: | |||
3 | |||
EXPLANATION: | |||
KNOWLEDGE I RECALL | |||
Required knowledge of procedural requirements for a single train of ESF | |||
actuation | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
IIarris NKC Written r;xaniinatio,n | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
QUESTION: | QUESTION: | ||
Given the following conditions: | 14 | ||
* | Given the following conditions: | ||
* 1CS-235, Charging Line Isolation, was closed to establish a clearance boundary for | |||
maintenance on ICs-238. | |||
1CS-235 had to be manually torqued shut. | |||
Prior to declaring lCS-235 operable after the clearance is removed, the valve must be | 1 CS-235 is a Limitorye SMB-OO!SR-OO motor-operated valve. | ||
E | |||
Prior to declaring lCS-235 operable after the clearance is removed, the valve must be I.. | |||
a. | |||
wrified to have the torque switch calibrated correctly. | |||
ANSWER: | b. stroked with the control switch. | ||
c. monitored for seat leakage. | |||
d. n~anually stroked hll open | |||
ANSWER: | |||
b. | |||
stroked with the control switch. | |||
Post Validatioii Revisiun | |||
Harris KRC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
Data Sheets | |||
QIJESTIQN NUMBER: 14 | QIJESTIQN NUMBER: 14 | ||
TIE:R/GRQUP: | |||
3 | |||
KA IMPORTANCE: | |||
RQ | |||
SRQ | |||
3.1 | |||
IQCFR55 CONTENT: | |||
41(b) | |||
43(b) | |||
5 | |||
KA: | |||
2.2.19 | |||
Knowledge of maintenance work order requirements | |||
QBJECTIVE: | |||
PP-2.41 | |||
Identify the primary functions and explain the responsibilities of the Work Coordination Centre | |||
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES: OMM-0 14 | |||
REFERENCES SUPPLIED r8 APPLICANT: | |||
None | |||
QITESTION SOURCE: | |||
DIFFICULTY AXALYSIS: | NEW | ||
SIGNHEICANT1,Y MODIFIED | |||
DIRECT | |||
BANK NUMBER FQR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED / DIRECT: | |||
E00 028 | |||
NRC EXAM HISTORY: | |||
Harris 2000 | |||
DISTRACTOR JUSTIFICACHQN (CQRRECr ANSWER dd): | |||
a. Plausible since the valve has been manually torqued onto the seat, but the requirement is that the valve | |||
must he stroked electrically from the coutrol switch. | |||
v b. ,411 Iiniitorque SMB-OOISB-00 motor operated valves, if manually operatrd, are required to be stroked | |||
electrically from the control switch to he declared operable. | |||
E. Plausible since over torqueing a valve may result iu seat leakage, hut the requirement is that the valve | |||
must be stroked electricalty from the control switch. | |||
d. Plausible since the valve \\vas manually torqued clostU, hut the requirement is that the valve must he | |||
stroked electrically from the control switch. | |||
DIFFICULTY AXALYSIS: | |||
COMPREHENSIVE / ANA1,YSIS | |||
KNQWI.EDGE 1 RECALL | |||
DIFFICXJLIY RATING: | |||
3 | |||
EXII,AMAIION: | |||
Knowledge of administrative post-work practices required | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Harris NRC Writtcn Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
QUESTION: | QUESTION: | ||
Given the following conditions: | 15 | ||
0 | Given the following conditions: | ||
0 | |||
Following 21 Reactor Trip and Safety Injection, a transition has eventually been made | |||
to EOP-EPP-0 15, l.!ncontrolled Depressurization of All S t e m Generators. | |||
Both Main and Auxiliary Feed Flow have been isolated to all SGs. | |||
Directions have just been given to locally isolate steam flows from all SGs. | |||
Which of the following actions should be taken? | SC; A pressure appears to have stabilized at approximately 100 psig, while the other | ||
SGs have completely depressurized. | |||
e | |||
a | |||
e | |||
Which of the following actions should be taken? | |||
a. Transition to FOP-EPP-014, Faulted SG Isolation, since this is indication that | |||
SG A has been isolated. | |||
b. Continue in FOP-EPP-01.5 and re-establish AFW flow to S G A at ininimuni | |||
ANSWER: | flow. | ||
c. Transition to EOP-PATH-2 if local radiation surveys indicate primary-to- | |||
sccotidary leakage is occurring. | |||
d. Iransition to FOP-EPP-008, SI Termination, to prevent overpressurizing the | |||
RCS. | |||
ANSWER: | |||
c. Transition to EOP-PAIH-2 if local radiation surveys indicate primary-to- | |||
secondary leakage is occurring. | |||
Post Validation Rcvision | |||
Harris NRC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
Data Sheets | |||
QUESllQX NUMBER: 15 | QUESllQX NUMBER: | ||
15 | |||
'P'IEWGROUR | |||
lil | |||
K4 IMPORTANCE: | |||
RO | |||
SRO | |||
3.8 | |||
IOCFR55 CONTENT: | |||
41(h) | |||
43(b) | |||
2 | |||
Lk 000040G2.1.32 | |||
DISTRACTOR JUSTPFPCACI'ION (CORRECT ANSWER d'd): | Ability to explain arid appiy all system limits and precautions. (Stearn Iine Rupture - Excessive Heat | ||
Transfer) | |||
OBJECTIVE: | |||
EOP-3.9-7 | |||
Given a step, caution. or note from an emergency procedure, state its purpose | |||
4 e. | DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES: | ||
EUP-EI'P-0 15 | |||
REFERENCXS SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT: | |||
None | |||
QUESTION SOUI1CE: | |||
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS: | NEW | ||
SIGN1FIICANTL.Y MODIFIED | |||
DIRECT | |||
HANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED / DIRECT: | |||
New | |||
NHC EXAM HISTORY: | |||
None | |||
DISTRACTOR JUSTPFPCACI'ION (CORRECT ANSWER d'd): | |||
a. Plausible since once a SG is confirmed to be isolated in FFP-OLS, a foldout page item directs a | |||
transition to EPP-014. | |||
h. Plausible since without indications of a SG tuhe leak, actions would be taken to remain in EPP-0 I5 | |||
and mainhin feed Row at minimum. | |||
4 e. | |||
A SG may be suspected to be ruptured if it fails to d q out following isolation of feed flow. Local | |||
checks for radiation can be used to confinn prin~aiy-to-~~coiida~- | |||
leakage. | |||
d. Plausible since a desired goal after isolating a faulted SG is to terminate SI as soon as conditions are | |||
met to prevent overfilling and overpressmizing the RCS. | |||
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS: | |||
CQMPREIIENSPVE / ANALYSIS | |||
KYOWLEDGE i RECALL | |||
DIFFICIjLTY RATING: | |||
3 | |||
EXPLANATION: | |||
Must analyze the cause of the failure of the SG to depressurize and then | |||
determine thc correct actions based on the analysis. | |||
Post Validation Rwision | |||
Harris NRC Written Exanlinetion | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
QUESTION: | QUESTION: | ||
The unit has tripped due to a | 16 | ||
EOP-FRP-C.2, Response to Degraded Core Conling, has been entered. | The unit has tripped due to a IDCX and ESF equipment has failed to start. As a result, | ||
A depressurization of the Steam Generators (SGs) to 80 psig is being performed, in | EOP-FRP-C.2, Response to Degraded Core Conling, has been entered. | ||
accordance with the procedure, when the STA reports that a Red Path condition fi,r Integrity | A depressurization of the Steam Generators (SGs) to 80 psig is being performed, in | ||
has occurred. | accordance with the procedure, when the STA reports that a Red Path condition fi,r Integrity | ||
Which of the following actions should be taken? | has occurred. | ||
Which of the following actions should be taken? | |||
a. | |||
Immediately transition to EOP-FRP-P. 1, Response to Imminent Pressurized | |||
?herma1 Shock Conditions | |||
b. Stop the YG depressurization and, if the red path does not clear, transition to EOP- | |||
FKP-P. 1 . Response to Imminent Pressurixd Thermal Shock Conditions | |||
c. Complete EOP-FRP-C.2 and then transition to EOP-FW-P. 1, Response to | |||
Imminent Pressurized Thermal Shock Conditions. if the red path still exists | |||
ANSWER | d. Complete the SKf depressurization and then transition to EOP-FRP-P. I, Response | ||
to Imminent Pressurized Thermal Shock Conditions, if the red path still exists | |||
ANSWER | |||
c. Complete EOP-FRP-C.2 and then transition to EOP-FIIP-1. i . Response to | |||
Imminent Pressurized Thennal Shock Conditions, if the red path still exists | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Harris NKC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
Data Sheets | |||
QUESTION NIJMBER: 16 | QUESTION NIJMBER: 16 | ||
TIEWGROUP: | |||
I i2 | |||
KA IMPORTANCE: | |||
RO | |||
SRO | |||
3.8 | |||
10CPK55 CONTENT: | |||
41(b) | |||
43(b) | |||
2 | |||
KA: | |||
WE06(i?. I .32 | |||
Ahiiity to explain and apply all system limits and precautions. (Degraded Core Cooling) | |||
OBJECTIVE: | |||
EOP-3.104 | |||
Given the following EOP steps, uotes, and cautions, describe the associated basis | |||
g. Stopping SG depressurization at 80 pig (C.2) | |||
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES: | |||
EOP-FKP-C.2 | |||
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT: | |||
None | |||
Qt!ESTIOX SOURCE: | |||
NEW | |||
SIGNBFICANFLY MODIFIED | |||
DIRECT | |||
BANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICAYlZY MODIFIED / I9IRECT: | |||
New | |||
NRC EXAM HISTORY: | |||
None | |||
DISTRACTOR .IUSTIFICACTION (COIPRECr ANSWER .Id): | |||
a~ Plausible since the red path for integrity has a higher priority than the orange path that caused entry | |||
into EOI-FRP-C:.2, hut under thsse particular conditions a transition should not occur until completion | |||
of the EOP-FRP-C.2. | |||
h. Plausible since the red path for integrity has a higher priority than the orange path that caused entry | |||
into EOP-FRP-C.2, but under these particular conditions a transitinn should not occur until completion | |||
ofthe EOP-FRP-C.2. | |||
During the depressurization, a red path may occur due to injecting the accumulators. A transition | |||
should not be made until the entire procedure has been completed. | |||
d. Plausible since the red path for inte~grity has a higher priority than the orange path that caused entry | |||
into EOP-FIW-C.2, hut under these particular conditions a transition should tint occur until completion | |||
of the EOP-FKIC.2. | |||
d E. | |||
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS: | |||
COMPKEIIENSIVE / ANALYSIS | |||
DIFFICULTY RATING: | |||
3 | |||
EXPLANATION: | |||
KNOWLEDGE / RECALL | |||
Must analyze plant conditions to determine that the cause ofthe red path is the | |||
depressurization and that, under these specific conditions, an immediate | |||
transition is not wairanted | |||
Post Validation Kcvision | |||
Harris NKC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
Given the following conditions: | Given the following conditions: | ||
e | e | ||
a | |||
e | |||
In order to prevent an inadvertent Safegaards Actuation, which of the following must be | The unit is in Mode 3. | ||
verified prior to re-energizing the bus and why? | Instrument Buses IUP-1B-SI1 and 1DP-IB-SIV are both de-energized. | ||
Maintenance reports that Instrument Bus IDP-IB-SI1 is ready to be re-energized | |||
In order to prevent an inadvertent Safegaards Actuation, which of the following must be | |||
verified prior to re-energizing the bus and why? | |||
a. | |||
Train A Logic Input Error Inhibit must be verified to be in IIWIBIT due to the | |||
proper coincidence for an actuation being available | |||
b. | |||
Train A Logic Train Output must be verified to be in TESI to prevent an | |||
ANSWER: | inadvertent Safeguard Actuation due to the loss of the SI BLOCK Signals | ||
c. Train B Logic Input Etror Inhibit must be verified to be in INHIBIT due to the | |||
proper coincidence for an actuation being available | |||
d. Train B 1,ogic Train Output must be verified to be in TEST to prevent an | |||
inadvertent Safeguard Actuation due to the loss ofthe SI BLOCK Signals | |||
ANSWER: | |||
d. Train 1% | |||
Logic Train Output must be verified to be in TESI to prevent an | |||
inadvertent Safebmard Actuation due to the loss ofthe SI BLOCK Signals | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Harris NRC' Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
Data Sheets | |||
QUESTION NUMBER: 14 | QUESTION NUMBER: 14 | ||
TIEWGROUP: | |||
21 1 | |||
KA IMPORTANCE: | |||
RO | |||
SRO | |||
3.4 | |||
10CFRS5 CONTENT: | |||
41(h) | |||
43(b) | |||
2 | |||
KA: 06262.2.22 | |||
Ktiowledge of limiting conditions for operations and safety limits. (.4C Electrical Ilistribution) | |||
OBJECTIVE: | |||
ESFAS-3.0-4 | |||
Given applicable logic diagrams and a set of plant conditions, predict how loss of any of the four | |||
instrument buses will affect the ESFAS output functions of each SSFS train. | |||
I)E:VELOPMENT REFERENCES: OP-156.02 | |||
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT: | |||
None | |||
QUESTION SOURCE: | |||
NEW | |||
SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED | |||
DIRECT | |||
BANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANT1,Y MODIFIED i DIRECT: | |||
New | |||
NRC EXAM HISTORY: | |||
None | |||
DISTRACTOR JUSTIFPCACTION (CORRECT ANSWER d'd): | |||
a. | |||
Plausible since the loss of both trains of power will provide the proper coincidence, hut power must be | |||
available to the output relays to actuate. Placing the input error inhibit in INHIBIT at this time will | |||
not prevent an actuation since the logic is already made up. Also the incorrect Train. | |||
h. Plausible since the loss of both trains of power causes the SI BIock signals to he lost and when either | |||
of the supplies is restored, power will be available to the output relays to cause an actuation. however | |||
this occurs on Train 'H' for this event. | |||
c. Plausible since the loss of both trains of power will provide the proper coincidence, but power must be | |||
available to the output relays to actuate. Placing the input error inhibit in INHIHI'I' at this time will | |||
not prevent an actuation since the logic is already niade up. | |||
.! d. The loss ofboth trains of power causes the SI Block signals to he lost. When either ofthe supplies is | |||
restored, power will be available to the output relays to cause an actuation. | |||
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS: | |||
COMPREIIENSIVE / ARALYSIS | |||
DIFFICULTY RATING: | |||
3 | |||
EXPLAYATION: | |||
KNOWLEDGE i RECALL | |||
Must determine train of SSPS affected by the loss of power and then analyze the | |||
effect of partially restoring power | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Harris NKC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
QUESTION: | QUESTION: | ||
The I Jnit-SCO arid Superitltendent-Shift Operations are discussing invoking | 18 | ||
The I Jnit-SCO arid Superitltendent-Shift Operations are discussing invoking | |||
to a condition arising which is NOT addressed by the procedures or Technical | I OCFR51).54(x) during the intplernentation of the Emergency Operating Procedures due | ||
Specifications. | to a condition arising which is NOT addressed by the procedures or Technical | ||
Which of the following conditions must be met when invoking | Specifications. | ||
Which of the following conditions must be met when invoking 1 OCFR50.54(x)? | |||
a. The action must be approved by an additional Iicensed Senior Reactor Operator | |||
when the action is necessary to prevent equipnient damage. | |||
b. The action must he approved by the Superintendent-Shift Operations prior to | |||
taking the action. | |||
The KRC must concur with the action to be taken prior to the action actually being | |||
taken. | |||
c. | |||
ANSWER: | d. The action must be approved by the Manager-Operations when the action is | ||
necessary to protect plant personnel. | |||
ANSWER: | |||
b. The action must be approved by the Superintendent-Shift Operalions prior to | |||
taking the action. | |||
Post Validation Kevision | |||
Harris NRC Written Examination | |||
Senior Keactor Operator | |||
Data Sheets | |||
QUESTION NUMBER: 18 | QUESTION NUMBER: | ||
18 | |||
TIEWGROUP | |||
3 | |||
MA IMPORTANCE: | |||
RO | |||
SRO | |||
3.3 | |||
10CFR55 CQNTENT: | |||
41(b) | |||
43(b) | |||
3 | |||
KA: | |||
2.2.10 | |||
DISIRACTOR JUSTPFICACTION (CORRECT ANSWER d'd): | Knowledge of the process for determining if the margin of safety, as defined in the basis of any technical | ||
specification is reduced by a proposed change, test or experiment | |||
OBJECTIVE: | |||
P1'-2.0-S2 | |||
t' b. The minimum level of approvai per PRO-NGGC-0200 is the Superintendent-Shift Operations. but it | LTS'I the actions required by the individual who authorizes a deviation from the Technical Specifications | ||
or license conditions | |||
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES: | |||
PRO-KGGC-0200 | |||
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT: | |||
None | |||
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS: | QtJESTION SOURCE: | ||
NEW | |||
SIGNHFICtlRTLY MODIFBED | |||
DIRECT | |||
BANK NIIMBER FOR SIGXIFICANTLY MODIFIED i DIRECT: | |||
INPO 233 I8 | |||
NRC EXAM IIISTORY: | |||
None | |||
DISIRACTOR JUSTPFICACTION (CORRECT ANSWER d'd): | |||
a. Plausible since IOCFK5054(x) requires that a licensed SRO approve any actions which deviate from | |||
license conditions prior to performance, but the actions must be to protect the health and safety ofthe | |||
public. | |||
t' b. The minimum level of approvai per PRO-NGGC-0200 is the Superintendent-Shift Operations. but it | |||
can be approved by any personnel holding an SRO license above this position also. | |||
6. Piausible since the NRC must be notified, but the notification requirenients are within 1 hour per AP- | |||
617. | |||
d. Plausible since the Manager-Operations can approve a deviation if he holds an SRO license, but the | |||
actions must he to protect the health and safety ofthe public. | |||
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS: | |||
COMPREIIENSIVE: / ANALYSIS | |||
DIFFICULTY RATING: | |||
2 | |||
KNO\\I'LF:DGE i RECALL | |||
EXPIANATIOX: | |||
Requires knowledge of requirements for process of performing actions nnt | |||
described in any licensing hasis documents. | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Harris NRC Written Exanimation | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
QUESTION: | QUESTION: | ||
Given the following conditions: | 19 | ||
* Following a Loss ofAll Power, EDG IA-SA has been restarted and partially loaded. | Given the following conditions: | ||
* | |||
Following a Loss ofAll Power, EDG IA-SA has been restarted and partially loaded. | |||
A transition has been made to EOP-EPP-003, 1x)ss of All AC Power Kecovery with | |||
K7hich of the following would result in an LJNACCEPTABLE loading condition for EDG | SI Kequired. | ||
EDC 1.4-SA is currently loaded to 4.5 MWe and 3.5 MVAR. | |||
* | |||
K7hich of the following would result in an LJNACCEPTABLE loading condition for EDG | |||
1 A-SA? | |||
a. | |||
Pick up an additional 0.5 h4.1U7e | |||
* Pick up an additional 0.1 MVAR | |||
b. * | |||
Pick up an additional I .O MWe | |||
ANSWER: | e | ||
Pick up an additional 0.5 MVAK | |||
c. * Pick up an additional 1 .S MWe | |||
e | |||
Pick up an additional 1 .O MVAR | |||
ti. | |||
e | |||
Pick up an additional 2.0 MWe | |||
* Pick up an additional 1.2 14.IVAR | |||
ANSWER: | |||
c. | |||
e | |||
Pick up an additional 1.5 MVVe | |||
* Pick up an additional I .O MVAR | |||
Post Validation Kevisioii | |||
Harris NRC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
Data Sheets | |||
QUESTION NIMREIP: 19 | QUESTION NIMREIP: 19 | ||
TIEWGROUP: | |||
1!1 | |||
Kri IMPORTANCE: | |||
RO | |||
SRO | |||
4.6 | |||
10CFR55 CONTENT: | |||
416b) | |||
43(b) | |||
5 | |||
KA: | |||
00005OAA2.14 | |||
Ability to detennine and interpret the following as they apply to the Loss of Offsite Power: (lperational | |||
status of EDiGs (A and 13;) | |||
OEJECTIVE: | |||
EOP-3.7-6 | |||
Given a step, caution, or note from EOP-001, EOP-002, or EOP-003, state its purpose | |||
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES: OP-l S5, Attachment 9 | |||
F:OP-EPP-003 | |||
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT: | |||
QUESTION SOURCK: | |||
NEW | |||
SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFPED | |||
DIRECT | |||
OP- 155, Attachment 9 | |||
RANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED I DIRECT: | |||
New | |||
NRC EXAM HISTORY: | |||
None | |||
DISTRACTOR JILJSTIFICACT1[ON (C33RRECT ANSWER .Id): | |||
a. Plausible since new loading will be 5.0 MWe and 3.6 MVAK. which is just within acceptable limits. | |||
b. Plausible since new hading will he 5 3 MWe and 4.0 MVAR, which is just within acceptable limits, | |||
d E. New loading will be 6.0 MWe and 4.5 MVAR, which is outside acceptable limits. | |||
at. Plausible since new loading will be 6.5 MWe and 4.7 MVAK. which is just within acceptable limits, | |||
DIFFICIJLTY ANALYSIS: | |||
~ | |||
~~ | |||
COMPREIIENSIVE / ANALYSIS | |||
ICVOWLEDGE /RECALL | |||
DIFFICULTY RATING: | |||
3 | |||
EXPLANATION: | |||
Must analpz EDG operability curve to determine whether additional MWc and | |||
MVAR loading is urithin acceptahle limits | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
IIarris NRC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
QUESTION: | QUESTION: | ||
h reactor trip occurred due to a loss of offsite power. The plant is being cooled down on | 20 | ||
RIIR per EPP-006. Natural Circulation Cooldown with Steam Void in Vessel with | h reactor trip occurred due to a loss of offsite power. The plant is being cooled down on | ||
RVLIS. | RIIR per EPP-006. Natural Circulation Cooldown with Steam Void in Vessel with | ||
RVLIS. | |||
0 | |||
0 | |||
* | |||
Steam should be dumped from all SGs to ensure ... | * | ||
KCS cold leg temperatures are 190°F. | |||
Steam generator pressures are 50 psig. | |||
RVLIS upper range indicates greater than 100%. | |||
Three CRUX4 fans have been running during the entire cooldown. | |||
Steam should be dumped from all SGs to ensure . . . | |||
a. boron concentration is equalized throughout the RCS prior to taking a sample to | |||
AYVSWER: | verify cold shutdown boron conditions. | ||
b. all inactive portions of the RCS are below 2M"F prior to cotnplete RCS | |||
depressurization. | |||
c. RCS and SG temperatures are equalized prior to any subsequent RCI' restart | |||
d. RCS temperatures do not increase during the required 29 hour vessel soak period. | |||
AYVSWER: | |||
b. all inactive portions of thc RCS are below 200°F prior to complete RCS | |||
depressurization. | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Harris NRC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
Data Sheets | |||
QIIESTION NI!NBER: 20 | QIIESTION NI!NBER: 20 | ||
TIEWGROUP: | |||
112 | |||
ICI IMPORTANCE: | |||
RO | |||
SRO | |||
3.8 | |||
lOCFR55 (IONTENT: | |||
41(b) | |||
13(b) | |||
2 | |||
MA: WE09(i2.1 3 2 | |||
Ability to explain and apply all system limits and precautions. (Natunl Circulation Operations) | |||
OBJECTIVE: | |||
DHSTRAQ: | EOP-3.8-2 | ||
Demonstrate the below-assumed operator knowledge from the SHNPP Step Deviation Document and the | |||
WOG ERGS that support perfonnance of EOP actions: Iieterniining that upper head and SG U-tube | |||
./ h. S G pressure above 0 psig indicates that the SGs are above 200°F. Depressurizing the 1 - 3 3 undcr this | temperatures are below 200 "F | ||
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES: | |||
EOP-EPP-006 | |||
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT: | |||
None | |||
QCESTION SOURCE: | |||
I)IFFICUI,TY ANALYSIS: | NEW | ||
SIGNHFPCANTLY IIfODIFIEB | |||
DIRECT | |||
BANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED / DIRECl: | |||
EOP-3.8 006 | |||
NRC EXAM HISTORY: | |||
None | |||
DHSTRAQ:TOR JUSTKFICACTION (CORRECT ANSWER d'd): | |||
a. Plausible since this action would have been performed in this procedure, hut niust be completed prio~ | |||
to depressurizing the RCS below 19(m psig:. | |||
./ h. S G pressure above 0 psig indicates that the SGs are above 200°F. Depressurizing the 1 - 3 3 undcr this | |||
condition will result in additional void formation in the SG u-tubes. | |||
e. | |||
Plausible since RCP operation throughout NC Cooldown is desirable, but will not be performed at this | |||
point in the procedure. | |||
d. Plausible since a soak period is addressed, but only if continued operation of CKIIM fans had not been | |||
maintained. | |||
I)IFFICUI,TY ANALYSIS: | |||
COMPREHENSIVE / ANALYSIS | |||
DIFFICULTY RATISG: | |||
3 | |||
EXPIANATION: | |||
KNOWLEDGE /HECALL | |||
Must analyze the conditions and detennine that the entire RCS is not below | |||
200°F and the effect of depressurizing under these conditions. | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
FIarris NRC Wiittcii Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
QUESTION: | QUESTION: | ||
During an emergency, a worker has been directed to enter a high radiation area and | 21 | ||
perform a repair necessary for the protection of valuable property. | During an emergency, a worker has been directed to enter a high radiation area and | ||
In accordance with PEP-330. Radiological Consequences, the workers exposure | perform a repair necessary for the protection of valuable property. | ||
should be limited to ... | In accordance with PEP-330. Radiological Consequences, the workers exposure | ||
should be limited to . . . | |||
a. | |||
10 Rem WIPE and the entry does NOT require specific Site Etnergency | |||
Coordinator authorization. | |||
b. | |||
10 Rem TEDE and the entry requires specific Site Emergency Coordinator | |||
authorization. | |||
c. | |||
ANSWER: | 25 Rem TEDE and the entry does NOT require specific Site Emergency | ||
Coordinator authorization. | |||
d. 25 Rem EDE and the entry requires specific Site Emergency Coordinator | |||
authorization. | |||
ANSWER: | |||
b. | |||
10 Rem TEDE and the entry requires specific Site Emergency Coordinator | |||
authorization. | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Hanis NRC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
Ihta Sheets | |||
QUESTION NUMBER: 2 I | QUESTION NUMBER: 2 I | ||
TIEMUGROUP: | |||
3 | |||
K.4 IlbIPORTANCE: | |||
RO | |||
SRO | |||
3.3 | |||
10GPR55 CONTENT: | |||
41@) | |||
43(h) | |||
4 | |||
KA: | |||
1.3.7 | |||
Knowledge ofthe process for preparing a radiation work pemiit | |||
OWJEClIVE: EP2O-2h | |||
Identify the tyyes of prntcctive actions for HNP personnel (both on and off-site) and who is rcspniisible | |||
for directing them. | |||
m v E L o m E w r REFE.RENCES: PEP-330 | |||
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT: | |||
None | |||
QUESTION SOURCE: | |||
NEW | |||
SIGNIFICAN'IT,Y MODIFIED | |||
DIRECT | |||
BANK SUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED I DIRECT: | |||
New | |||
NHC EXAM HISTORY: | |||
None | |||
DISiZkPCTOR SUSTIFICAGTION (CORRECT ANSWER J'd): | |||
a. Plausible since IO rem 'TEDE for protecting valuable company property. hut S- SO approval is | |||
required. | |||
9' h. Exposure is limited to 10 rem TEDE is the limit required for this activity and S- SO approval is | |||
required. | |||
Piausihle since 25 rem THIF is the limit required for lifesaving efforts. hut the h i t to protect | |||
equipment atid property is LO rem 'TEDE. | |||
d. Plausible since 25 rem TEDE is the limit required for lifesaving effoits, but the litnit tn protect | |||
equipment and property is 10 rem TEDE. | |||
c. | |||
ICIJLTY ANALYSIS: | |||
COMPREHENSIVE I ANALYSIS | |||
DIFFICULTY RATING: | |||
3 | |||
EXPLANATION: | |||
KNOWLEDGE I RECALL, | |||
Requires knowledge of the emergency exposure limits and approval | |||
requirements | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Harris NRC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
QIJESTION: | QIJESTION: | ||
Given the following conditions: | 22 | ||
e | Given the following conditions: | ||
e | |||
0 | |||
Power is cui-rently at 32% during a plant startup. | |||
Which of the following actions must be taken? | Instrument Rut: IDP-IR-SIV deenergized as a result ofa fault in PIC' CAR-4. | ||
PIC CAR-4 has been isolated from Instrument Bus SIV and will be deenergized for | |||
approximately eight (8) hours while repairs are being made. | |||
Which of the following actions must be taken? | |||
a. Place ail PIC CAB-4 Reactor Trip instruments in the tripped condition | |||
ANSWER: | b. Place all PIC CAB-4 ESI: instrutnents in the tripped condition | ||
c. Place all MFW Regulating Valves in MANUAL | |||
d. Perform a plant shutdown | |||
ANSWER: | |||
d. Perfotm a plant shutdown | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Hairis NRC Written Esaniination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
Data Sheets | |||
QUESTION NL1MBE.R 22 | QUESTION NL1MBE.R 22 | ||
TIERGROUP: | |||
Iil | |||
K A IMPORTANCE: | |||
RO | |||
SRO | |||
4.1 | |||
IOCE'R55 CONTEXT: | |||
$I(b) | |||
43(h) | |||
2 | |||
KA: | |||
000057G2.2.22 | |||
Knowledge of limiting conditions for operations and safety limits. (Loss of Vital i\\C | |||
Instrument Ihs) | |||
0WEC:TICT: | |||
AOP-3.24-4 | |||
Uetemiine the following: a. Consequences of the loss of all power to PIC CAB4 | |||
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES: | |||
AOP-024 | |||
TS Table 3.3-3, pg 3-IX and 3-27 | |||
TS 3.0.3, pg 0-1 | |||
REFERENCES S u P r L I m TO APPLICANT: | |||
xone | |||
QUESTION SOURCE: 0 NEW | |||
SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED | |||
DIRECT | |||
BANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED I DLRECT: | |||
AOP-3.24-K4 00 1 | |||
NRC EXAM HISTORY: | |||
None | |||
D1STIIAC:TQ)R JUSTIFPCACTION (CORRECT 4NSWER t'"d): | |||
a. Plausible since instrunlent failures require bistables tripped, but they are deenergized to actuate and | |||
are already tripped since no power is available. | |||
b. Plausible sitice instnnnent faiinrees require bistables tripped, but they are deenergizd to actuate and | |||
are already tripped since no power is available. | |||
c. Plausihle since this is the immediate operator action for a loss of Instrument Bus SIII, not SIV | |||
4 d. Loss of all power to PIC' CAB-4 will result in 3 bistable channels of Steam Iine Pressure becoming | |||
inoperable. The 'IS action is io trip the bispables within one hour, but the bistables are energized to | |||
actuare. \\Vithout power awilable, this action cannot he perfoimed and TS 3.0.3 becomes applicable. | |||
ICULTY ANALYSIS: | |||
COMPREIIENSIVE I ANALYSIS | |||
DIFFICULTY RATING: | |||
4 | |||
EXPLANATION: | |||
0 KNOWLEDGE /RECALL | |||
Must recognize that energized io actuate histables cannot be placed in tripped | |||
condition without power, thus an entry into 1's 3.0.3 is required. and must | |||
determine the required TS 3.0.3 actions | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Harris NRC: Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
QUESTION: | QUESTION: | ||
During the performance of EOP-PATH-2, the STA reports that the following two (2) | 23 | ||
YELLOW path Critical Safety Function Status Trees (CSFST) exist: | During the performance of EOP-PATH-2, the STA reports that the following two (2) | ||
* | YELLOW path Critical Safety Function Status Trees (CSFST) exist: | ||
e | * Integrity | ||
Which of the following describes how these YELLOW paths are to be addressed and i or | e | ||
impletnentcd? | Heat Sink | ||
Which of the following describes how these YELLOW paths are to be addressed and i or | |||
impletnentcd? | |||
a. | |||
Both must be addressed and implemented, with Heat Sink having a higher priority | |||
than Integrity, as soon as EOP-PA?-2 actions are completed provided IICI other | |||
higher priority CSFSI conditions exist | |||
b. Both must be addressed, but implemented at the discretion of the Superintendent- | |||
Shift Uperations, prior to exiting from the EOP network | |||
Both must be addressed and implanented, with Heat Sink having a higher priority | |||
than Integrity, prior to exiting from the EOP network | |||
ANSWER: | c. | ||
tl. Both must be addressed. but implemented at the discretion ofthe Superintendent- | |||
Shift Operations, as soon as FOP-PATII-2 actions are completed provided no | |||
other higher priority (SFST conditions exist | |||
ANSWER: | |||
h. Both must he addressed, but implemented at the discretion of the Superinlendcnt- | |||
Shitt Operations, prior lo exiting from the FOP network | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Harris NRC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
Data Sheets | |||
QUESTION NUMBER 23 | QUESTION NUMBER 23 | ||
'I'IEWGROUP: | |||
3 | |||
Iiii IMPORTAXCE: | |||
RO | |||
sa0 | |||
4.0 | |||
IOCFR55 CONTENT: | |||
4B(b) | |||
43Bb) | |||
S | |||
Kh: | |||
2.4.22 | |||
Knowledge of the bases for prioritizing safety functions during abnormal/emergency operations | |||
OBJECTIVE: | |||
EOP-3.19-2 | |||
Describe Control Room usage of status trees as it relates to the following | |||
a. Priority of status trees | |||
b. Rules of usage | |||
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES: | |||
EOP User's Guide | |||
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO AQPLICANT: | |||
None | |||
BANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED / DIRECT: | |||
New | |||
NRC.' EXAM HISTORY: | |||
None | |||
DISTRACTOR JUSTIPICACTION (CORRECT ANSWER d3d): | |||
a. Plausible since they are to be addressed, but only prior to leaving the EOP network and are not | |||
required to he implemented. | |||
4 b. All YELI~.OW-condition CSFSTs should be addressed prior to exiting the EOP network. However, the | |||
operator is allowcd to decide if and when to implement. and whether to complete any YELLOW- | |||
condition I'KP. | |||
Plausible since they are to be addressed, but only prior to leaving the EOP network and are not | |||
required to be implemented. | |||
d. Plausible since they are to be addressed, but only prior to leaving the EOP network and an' not | |||
required to be implemented. | |||
E. | |||
D I B ; w x L r Y ANALYSIS: | |||
COMPREIIENSIVE / ANALYSIS | |||
I)%FFICUI,TY RATING: | |||
2 | |||
EXPLANATION: | |||
KNOWLEDGE / REXALI, | |||
Knowledge of the iu$ementation criteria for yellow CSFSTs as directed by | |||
plant procedures | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Harris NRC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
QUESTION: | QUESTION: | ||
Following a loss of a11 AC power, how long are the safety-related 125 VDC batteries | 24 | ||
DESIGNED to allow equipment operation'? | Following a loss of a11 AC power, how long are the safety-related 125 VDC batteries | ||
DESIGNED to allow equipment operation'? | |||
a. 2 hours, assuming t)C ioad shedding occurs within 30 minutes of the loss of all | |||
AC power | |||
2 hours, assuming DC load shedding occurs within 60 minutes of the loss of all | |||
AC power | |||
b. | |||
c. | |||
4 hours, assuming DC load shedding occurs within 30 minutes of the loss of all | |||
ANSWER: | AC power | ||
4 hours, assuming DC load shedding occurs within 60 minutes ofthe loss of all | |||
A S power | |||
d. | |||
ANSWER: | |||
d. 4 hours, assuming DC load shedding occurs within 60 tninutes of the loss of all | |||
AC' power | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
Harris NKC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
Data Sheets | |||
QUESTION NUMBER: 24 | QUESTION NUMBER: 24 | ||
TIEWGROUP: | |||
lil | |||
KA IMPORTANCE: | |||
RO | |||
SRO | |||
3.7 | |||
10CF1355 CONTENT: | |||
41(b) | |||
43(b) | |||
2 | |||
KA: 00005862.2.25 | |||
Knowledge of bases in technical specifications for limiting conditions for operations and safety limits. | |||
(L,oss of DC Power) | |||
OBJECTIVE: | |||
EOP-3.7-6 | |||
Given a step, caution, or note from EOP-001, EOP-002, or EOP-003, state its purpose | |||
DEVEL.0PMENT REFERENCES: | |||
Tech Spec Bases 3.8.2, pg 8-2 | |||
EOI'-EPP-00 I | |||
ADEL-1.P-2.6 | |||
REFERENCES SIJPPLIED TO APPLICANT: | |||
None | |||
QUESTION SOURCE: | |||
NEW | |||
SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED | |||
DIRECT | |||
BANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY IWODIFIED / DIRECT: | |||
AIlEL2-6-S I 00 I | |||
NRC E:XAM HISTORY: | |||
None | |||
DIS'FWAC'L'OR JUSTIFICACTION (CORRECT ANSWER +(I): | |||
PLausihlr since this is the time limit which requires actions being taken in accordance with Technical | |||
Specifications, hut the design oftlie hatteries is 4 hours. | |||
h. Plausihle since this is the time limit u-hich requires actions being taken in accordance with Technical | |||
Specifications, but the design of the batteries is 4 hours. | |||
c. Plausible since the design ofthe hatteries is 4 hours, but the design assumes that DC load shedding | |||
occurs within 60 minutes. not 30. | |||
v' d. Batteries are designed to can); required safety related loads for up to 4 hours without AC input to | |||
carry bus or charge hatter)., assuming that required load shedding occurs withiu I hour. | |||
a. | |||
ICUL'FY ANALYSIS: | |||
COMPREHENSIVE I ANALYSIS | |||
UIFFICGLTY RATING: | |||
3 | |||
EXPLANATION: | |||
KNOWLEDGE / RECALL | |||
Knowledge of tech spec basis arid design of safety-related batteries | |||
Post Vdidation Rrvisiou | |||
Harris NKC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
QUESTION: | QUESTION: | ||
Which of the following actions would be INAPPROPRIATE to pcrforni prior to | 25 | ||
direction in an EQP? | Which of the following actions would be INAPPROPRIATE to pcrforni prior to | ||
direction in an EQP? | |||
a. Isolating AFW flow to a single faulted S G | |||
h. Throttling AFW flow to control a rupkred SG level within the required level band | |||
c. | |||
ANSWER: | Securing a ('SIP to prevent overfilling the pressurizer following an inadvertant SI | ||
d. Shutting the MSIVs tu isolate a steamline break which has not resulted in an SI | |||
ANSWER: | |||
c. | |||
Securing a CSIP to prevent overfilling the pressurizer following an inadvertant SI | |||
Post Validation Kcvision | |||
IIarris NRC Written Examination | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
Data Sheets | |||
n | |||
QrJESTION NUMBER: 25 | QrJESTION NUMBER: 25 | ||
TIERKROUP: | |||
5 | |||
KA IMFORlANCE: | |||
RO | |||
SRO | |||
3 3 | |||
1OCFR55 CONTENT: | |||
41(h) | |||
43fb) | |||
5 | |||
KA: | |||
2.4.14 | |||
DISTRACTOR JUSTIPICACTKON (CORRECT ANSWER dd): | Knowledge of general guidelines for EOP flowchart use | ||
OBJECTIVE: | |||
FOP-LP-3.19-1 | |||
Descrihe Control Room usage of the EOP network as it relates to the following: a) Ierforniing steps out | |||
of sequence | |||
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES: | |||
EOP Ksers Chide | |||
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT: | |||
None | |||
QUESTION SOURCE: | |||
NEW | |||
SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFPED | |||
I)IFFICUI,TY ANALYSIS: | DIRECT | ||
BANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED / DIRECT: | |||
EOI-3.19-RI 0 18 | |||
NRC EXAM HISTORY: | |||
None | |||
DISTRACTOR JUSTIPICACTKON (CORRECT ANSWER dd): | |||
a. Plausible siuce this is a numbered step in PATH-I which are normally required to he performed in | |||
sequence, but the EOP Users Guide addresses this as being acceptable. | |||
b. Plausible since this is a numbered step in PATK 1 which are normally required to he performed in | |||
sequence, but the EOP Users Guide addresses this as being acceptable. | |||
V | |||
6. Perfotming steps out of sequence is allowed, but must be done with caution to prevent masking | |||
symptoms or defeating the intent ofthe EOI being used. Although terminating SI early might he | |||
beneficial to prevent filling the pressurizer if the only event is a spurious SI, this may result in further | |||
degradation of the plant if another undiagnosed event is in progress. | |||
d. Plausible since this is a numhered step in PATH-1 which are normally required to be perfomled in | |||
sequence, but the EOP f.Jsers Guide addresses this as being acceptable. | |||
I | |||
I)IFFICUI,TY ANALYSIS: | |||
COMPREIIENSIVE / ANALYSIS | |||
KNOWLEDGE /RECALL | |||
1)IFFICULTY RATING: | |||
3 | |||
EXP1,ANATION: | |||
Must differentiate between those actions which could potentially result in | |||
degradation ofthe plant iftaken out o f sequence and those actions which would | |||
likely have little impact on the operators abilities to diagnose other events. | |||
Post Validation Revision | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:23, 16 January 2025
| ML041170063 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris |
| Issue date: | 10/30/2003 |
| From: | Ernstes M Operator Licensing and Human Performance Branch |
| To: | Scarola J Carolina Power & Light Co |
| References | |
| 50-400/04-301 50-400/04-301 | |
| Download: ML041170063 (52) | |
See also: IR 05000400/2004301
Text
HARRIS EXAM
50-400/2004-301
FEBRUARY 23 - 27,2004
& MARCH 4,2004 (WRITTEN)
Harris
Draft
SRQ
Written
2004
Harris NRC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
QUESTION:
I
Given the following conditions:
Whiie operating at 100% power, a drop in PKZ pressure resulted in a Reactor Trip
and Safety Injection.
PRZ level is currently indicating > 100%.
PRZ pressure has stabilized at 1400 psig.
Containment pressure is 3.6 p i g and stable.
RCPs have been stopped.
RVtIS Full Range is indicating 20%.
Core Exit Thermocouples are indicating 745'1:.
RC:S Wide Range Hot Leg Temperatures are indicating 6SO'I:.
Which of the following conditions currently exists'?
a.
b.
A PKZ steam space break has occurred and core heat removal is ADEQUAI'E
A PRZ steam space break has occurred arid core heat removal is INADEQUAIE
An RCS hot ieg break has occurred and core heat removal is ADEQUATE
An RCS hot leg break has occ.urred and core heat removal is INADEQL!A?'E
c.
d.
ANSWER:
b. A I'KZ steam space break has occurrcd and core heat removal is INADEQGATE
Post Validation Rwision
Harris NKC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
Llata Sheets
QUESTION NUMBER:
1
TIEWGROUP:
1:1
KA IMPORTANCE:
4.1
IOCFR55 CONTENT:
41(b)
43(b)
5
KA:
000008AA2.30
Ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply to the Pressurizer Vapor Space Accident:
Inadequate core cooling
ORJECTIVE:
Given the following EOP steps, notes, aud cautions, describe the associated basis
c. RVLIS level of 39 percent (C. I)
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES: ECP-FRP-C. 1
C'SFST-Core Cooling
REFERENCES SIJPPII,PED TO APPLICANT:
None
OUESTYON SOIJRCE:
NEW fl
SKGNIFICANT1.Y MODIFIED n
DIRECT
LA
L A
bl
.
BANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED / D I m c r :
N ~ \\ V
NRC EXAM HISTORY:
None
DISTR4CTOR .JUSTYFICACTIOIV (CORRECT ANSWER \\I'd):
a. Plausible since the break is located in the PRZ steam space, but heat removal is not adequate.
d b. 'the RCS is superheated and in excess of 700"F, which indicates that inadequate heat rerncwal is
occuiiing. The break is in the PKZ steam space as indicated by the pressurizer being full.
Plausible since RCS temperatures are stable, hut the break is in the stearn space and heat removal is
not adequate.
d. Plausihle since RCS heat removal is not adequate, but the break is in the steam space.
c.
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS:
C0iW"IEPIENSIVE / ANALYSIS
DIFTICLJ1,TY RATIXG:
3
EXPLANATION:
KNOWLEDGE /RECALL
Must analyze plant conditions to determine location of hreak, determine that
temperature indications support superheated conditions and that heat removal is
inadequate
Post Validation Revision
IIarris NRC Written Examindtion
Senior Reactor Operator
QUESTION: 2
Which of the following describes a condition which would require Emergency Uoration
and the bases for taking this action?
a.
e
h.
e
e
c. *
d. *
'l'wenty minutes following a Main Feedwater Pump trip, Control Rods are
determined to be below the rod insertion limit
Control the reactivity transient associated with a steam line break
Twenty minutes following a Main Feedwater Pump trip, Control Rods are
determined to he helow the rod insertion limit
Control the reactivity transient associated with an inadvertent dilution
During a reactor startup, the Reactor achieves criticality with Bank C rods at
Control the reactivity transient associated with a stearn line break
105 steps
During a reactor startup, the Reactor achieves critic.aIity with Bank C rods at
Control the reactivity transient associated with an inadvertent dilution
105 steps
AKSWEW:
c.
e
During a reactor startup. the Reactor achieves criticality with Bank C rods at
Control the reactivity transient associated with a steam line break
IO5 steps
Post Validation Revision
Harris NRC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Opcrator
Data Sheets
QUESTION NUMBER: 2
TIEWGROUP:
li2
KA IMPORTANCE:
3.7
llOCFR55 CONTENT:
41(b)
43(b)
2
KA:
000024G2.2.25
Knowledge of bases in technical specifications for limiting conditions for operations and safety limits
(Emergency norat ion)
OBJECTIVE:
CVCS-3.0-R4
Given a (.VCS coniponentipa~anieter, state whether the componentiparameter is Tech Spec related
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES:
IS Bases 3i4.1.1
.4OP-002 ED
tip-004
REFERENCES SIJPPLIED TO APPLICANT:
?\\one
QUE.STIOK SOURCE:
NEW
SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED [3 DIRECT
BANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY iV1C)DIFIED / DIRECT:
AOP-3.2-Kl 001
NRC EXAM HISTORY:
None
DISTRACTOR JIJSTIFICACTION (CORRECT ANSWER dd):
a. Plausible since if this condition existed for 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, instead of 20 minutes, Emergency Roration would
be required. Additionally, in Modes 1 & 2, SDM is required to control the reactivity transient
associated with a stem line break. However, it is not required during transient conditions, allowing
the 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> to restore rod position.
La.
Plausibic since if this condition existed for 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, instead of 20 minutes, Emergency Boration would
he rcyuired. However, it is not required during transient conditions, ailowing the 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> to restore
rod position.
Emergency boration is required if SDM is not met. Criticality at steady spate conditions is considered
to he a loss of SDM. In Motlcs I & 2, SDM is required to control the reactikity transient associated
with 3 steam line break.
Plausihle since Emergency boration is required if SI)M is not met. Criticality at steady state
conditions is considered to he a loss of SDM. However, the concern for an inadvertent dilution is
related to a shutdown condition.
d c.
d.
ICKJLTY ANALYSIS:
COMPREHENSIVE / ANALYSIS
UIFFICULIY RATIXG:
2
EXPL,AN,4IION:
KNOWLEIIGE i RECALL
Knowledge of the requirements for initiating Emergency Boration and the bases
for these actions.
Post Validation Revisioii
IIarris NRC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
QCESTION:
3
Given the following conditions:
e
- CSIP 1.4-SA is operating.
o
Ihe plant has been operating at I@@% power for the past three (3) months.
CSIP 1B-SB has just been restored to a normal alignment following maintenance on
the pump impeller.
When CSIP 1B-SR is started the operator notes that suction pressure appears nornial,
while discharge pressure, discharge flow, and pump current are oscillating.
o
Which ofthe following is the most likely cause of these CSIP 1 B-SI3 indications?
a. Inadequate venting was performed during clearance restoration
b. The CSIP 1B-SB discharge valve was inadvertently left closed during clearance
restoration
c.
A failure of the CSIP 1B-SB miniflow isolation valve has resulted in gas binding
(I. A failure ofthe (XI IR-SB miniflow isolation valve has resulted in all pump
flow being recirculated to the VCT
ANSWER:
a. inadequate venting was perfonned during clearance restoration
Post Validation Revision
Haris NRC Written Examination
Senior Rnctor Operator
Data Sheets
QtXSTION NUMBER: 3
TIEWGROUP:
2: I
KA IMPORTANCE:
3.8
IOCFRS CowrmT:
41(b)
43fb)
5
EL\\:
006A2.04
Ability to (a) predict the impacts ofthe following malfunctions or operations on the ICCS; and (b) based
on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences ofthose
inalfiinctions or operations: Improper discharge pressure
OBJECTIVE:
Given a set of plant conditions and a copy of AOP-002, determine if the possibility of gas hinding the
CSIPs exists and the coirectiue action to be taken
DEVELOPMEST REFERENCES:
OP-IO7
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT:
None
SOEK 97-1
~
QUESTION SOURCE:
NEW
SIC~MFICANTLY MODIFIED
DIRECT
BARK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED I DIRECT:
Rew
NRC EXAM HISTORY:
None
DISTRACTOW SI!STIFPCACTBON (CORRECT ANSWER dd):
d a. Gas binding o f a pump results in lower than expected pressure, flow, and current. Likely cause is
improper venting of pump when restoring from post maintenance activities.
b. Plausible since improper alignment would result in low flow and current, but a closed discharge V d h C
would cause discharge pressure to be high.
Plausible since gas binding is cause of these indications, but will not occur as a result of pump recirc
valve being open.
d. Plausible since a failed open recirc valve will cause indicated flow to be low since flow is rneasu~ud
dowstreatn of the recirc valve. hut discharge pressure and current would be at or near normal.
e.
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS:
COMPREEIENSIVE i ANALYSIS
DIFFICULTY RATING:
3
EXPLANATION:
KNOWLEDGE i RECALL
Must analyze given pump conditiuns to determitie failure mode and then
determine likely cause of gas binding of the pump
Post Validation Revision
Harris NKC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
QUESTION:
4
Given the following conditions:
e
e
The unit is operating at 100% power, with C.;ontrol Bank D rods at 215 steps.
ALB 13-7-1, ROD CONIROI, URGENT ALARM, is in AIAKM due to a failure in
Power Cabinet I AC.
Rod Control is in MAN.
A turbine trip occurs, but the Reactor f'ails to trip either automatically or manually.
o
e-
Which of the following actions should the Reactor Operator be directed to take'?
a. Place the Rod Control BANK SELECTOR in AUTO and allow rods to itisett
b. Maintain the Rod Control K4NK SELECTOR in MAN and manually insert rods
c.
Place the Kod Control BANK SELECTOK in RANK U and manually insert rods
d. Maintain rods at 2 15 steps
ANSWER:
d. Maintain rods at 21 5 steps
Post Validation Kevision
IIarris NRC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
Data Sheets
QUESTION NUMBER: 4
TIEWGROUP:
2 2
KA IMPORTANCE:
4.0
10CFR55 CONTENT:
4B(h)
43(b)
5
KA:
001G2.4.h
Knowledge of symptom based E01' mitigation strategies. (Control Rod Drive)
OBJECTIVE:
Given a set of conditions during EOP implementation, determine the correct response or required action
based upon the EOP 1.Jser's Guide general information
z.
Use of "Bank Select" during an AI'WS
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES:
E( )P-USERS GUIDE
EOP-FRP-S. I
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT:
None
QuESTIcrN SOUIPCE:
NEW'
SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED
DIRECT
BANK NUM5ER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED / DIRECT
New
NRC EXAM EPIS'IORY:
None
DISTRACTOR JLSTIFICACTION (CORRECI' ANSW'ER +d):
a. Plausible since this is an RNO action for a failure of the reactor to trip. but will not be successful due
to the urgent failure in rod control.
b. Plausible since this is an RNO action for a failure of the reactor to trip, hut will not be successful due
to the urgent failure in rod control.
Plausible since this will allow Bank D rods to tmwe inward, and is the only method of iuserting rods
with the rod coutrol failure, hut should not be used due to the potential to cause unanalyzed flux
shapes.
4 d. Due to the urgent failure, rods will not nmve in AIJTO or MAN, Although they urill move in BANK
D with this particular failure, niovitig r d s in individual banks may result in unanalyzed flux shapes
which could result in hrl damage.
c.
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS:
Q~OMPRFXBENSIVE
/ ANALYSIS
DIFFICULTY RATING:
3
EXPLANATION:
KNOWLEDGE I RECALL
Must aualyze the effect of an urgent rod control failure aid then apply the
failure results to the plant conditions to determine the proper actions
Post Validation Revision
Harris NRC Written Examination
Seniot Reactor Operator
QUESTION:
5
Four Operators worked the following schedule in the Control Room over the past six
days:
I-IOI JRS WORKED (Shift turnover lime not included. Do NOT assume any hours
worked before or after this period.)
OPERATOR DAY B DAY 2 DAY 3 DAY 4 DAY 5 DAY6
1
I 0
14
off
12
12
12
2
14
12
14
10
off
11
3
off
off
off
13
I 1
14
4
I 1
13
14
off
I I
12
Which of the operators would be permitted to work a 12-hour shift on Day 7 W'IIHO1iT
requiring permission to exceed nonnal owtime limits?
a.
Operator 1
b. Operator 2
c.
Operator3
d. Operator 4
ANSWER:
a. Operator 1
Post Validation Revision
Harris NRC Written Examination
Senior Keactor Operator
Data Sheets
QUESTION NCMBER: S
TIEWGROIJP:
3
KA IMPORTANCE:
4.0
lQCFR55 CONTENT:
41@)
43(h)
5
KA:
2.1.2
Knowledge of operator responsibilities during all modes ofplant operation
OBJECTIVE:
PP-2.0-SI
$FATE the requirements contained in Administrative Controls Section, including requirenients for
the following:
e
Unit staff, including overtime limitations
I)E\\ELCPPMENT REFERENCES:
AP-012
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPIKANT:
None
~
QUESTION SOIJRCE:
NEW
SIGNIFICAIVTLY MODIFIED
DIRECT
BANK NUMBF:R FOR S1GNIFICANTI.Y RIODIEIED / DIRECT:
Robinson NRC 200 I
NRC EXAM IIISTORY:
None
DISTRACTOR JI;STIFICACTICPN (CORRECT ANSWER dd):
d a. Working a 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> shift on Day 7 would result in this operator working 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> out of 18, and 72
hours in I days, both of which are permissible.
b. Plausible since this operator would not e?tc~ed the 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> out of 48 limit and has had a recent day
off, but would work 73 hours8.449074e-4 days <br />0.0203 hours <br />1.207011e-4 weeks <br />2.77765e-5 months <br /> in 7 days which exceeds limit.
E. Plausible since this operator would not exceed the 42 hours4.861111e-4 days <br />0.0117 hours <br />6.944444e-5 weeks <br />1.5981e-5 months <br /> in 41 day limit and has several recent days
off, but wouid work more than 2.1 hours1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> in 48 which exceeds limit.
(8.
Ilausible since this operator would riot exceed the 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> out of48 limit arid has had a recent day
off. but would work 73 hours8.449074e-4 days <br />0.0203 hours <br />1.207011e-4 weeks <br />2.77765e-5 months <br /> in 7 days which exceeds limit.
DIFFECXJLTY AIVALYSBS:
COMPREHENSIVE / ANALYSIS
DIFFICULTY RATING:
3
EXPLANATION:
KNOWLEDGE I RECALL
Kequired to compare given data to administrative litnits to dctermine which
operator would remain within acceptable overtime limits
Post Validation Revision
Hairis NRC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Clperator
QBJESTIBN:
6
Given the following conditions:
e
e
A Reactor Trip with SI occurs.
The operators perform the immediate action steps, verify ECCS flow, and check
SG levels are < 25% and the required AFW ilow cannot be established, so the
opcrators enter FOP-ERP-H. 1, Response to Loss of Secondary Heat Sink.
MCS pressure is 175 psig.
Ail SG pressures are between 300 psig and 350 psig.
AFW Oow.
e
Which of the following actions is to be taken?
a.
b.
c.
d .
Continue in EOP-FRP-H. 1 since FOP-FRP-H. 1 has a higher priority than PATH-I
and attempt to establish AFW or Main Feedwater flow.
(ontintie in FOP-FRP-11. I since EOP-FKP-H.1 has a higher priority than PATH-I
and initiate KCS feed and bleed.
Keturn to E,OP-PATII-i at the step that was in effect since a secondary heat sink is
NOT required following a large break LOCA.
Return to FOP-PATH- I at Entry Point C since a secondary heat sink is NOT
required following a large break LOCA.
ANSWER:
c.
Return to IiOP-PA?II-l at the step that was in elfect since a secondary heat sink is
KOT required following a large break LOCA.
Post Validation Revision
Ifarris NKC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
P d M $lieetS
QIJE.:s'I'ION NUMBER 6
TIEWGROIJP:
lil
EL4 IMPORTANCE:
4.0
10CFR55 CO?XENT:
4P(b)
43(b)
5
ai: 00001 1G2.4.6
Knowledge of symptom based EOP mitigation strategies. (Large Break 1,OCA)
OBJECTIVE:
Given the following EOP steps, notes, and cautions, describe the associated basis
e.
Requirements fur a heat sink (W. I)
DEVE1,OPMENI' REFERENCES:
E0P-FRP-K. 1
REFEKEBCES SUPPI.1F.D TO APPLICANT:
None
QrJKSTION SOURCE:
NEW
SIGNIF'ICANT1,Y MODIFIED
DIRECT
BASK NUMBER FOR S K
CANTLY MODIFIED / DIRECT:
EOP-3. I 1-KI 003
NRC EXAM HISTORY:
Sone
1)PSTRACTOH JCJSTIFICACTION (CORRECT ANSWER d'd):
a. Plausible since these are actions that are taken upon entry iuto FRP-H. 1, but a secondary heat sink
would not be required with RC'S pressure <' SG pressure.
b. Plausible since these are actions that might be taken upon entry into FRP-H.I. but a secondary heat
sink would not be required with RCS pressure 'c SG pressure.
Since RCS pressure is less than S a.
I
If a safety injection occurs while implementing FW-S. 1, proper operation of SI equipment is veritkd
while continuing with FRP-S.I.
b. Plausible since PATII-I provides instructions for a response lo safety injection, but FRP-S. I must be
performed until completion.
Plausible since PATH-I provides instructions for a response to safety iujection. but FRP-S. I must be
performed until completion.
d. Plausible sirice a safety injection will result in a loss of MFW: hut AFW flow is capable of providing
niininium required flow.
c.
I c u c r Y ANALYSIS:
COMPREHENSIVE i ANALYSIS
DIFFICULTY RATING:
2
EXPLANATION:
mOWLEDGE / RECALL
Knowledge of procedural requirements in EPP-FRP-S. I
Post Validation Revision
IIairis NRC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
QUESTION:
9
Given the following conditions:
e
The plant is in Mode 3 with all Shutdown Rods withdrawn.
All power is lost to the Digital Rod Position Indication display and CANNOT be
restored.
Which of the following actions is to be taken?
a.
Verify that all Shutdown Bank Rods are fully withdrawn using Detnand Position
Indication
b. Determine that all Shutdown Bank Rods are fully withdrawn using the movable
incore detectors
c.
Commence a boration ofthe RCS to ensure adequate Shutdown Margin
d. Open the Reactor Trip Breakers
ANSWER:
d. Open the Reactor Trip Breakers
Post Validation Revision
Ilanis NRC: Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
Data Sheets
QtJESTION NUMBER: 9
TIEWUGROIJP:
211
KA IMPORTANCE:
3.6
POCFR55 COXTENT:
41(b)
43(b)
5
KA: 01442.02
Ability to (a) predict the impacts ofthe following malfunctions or operations on the RF'IS; and (b) based
on those on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those
malfunctions or operations: E.oss of power to the RPIS
OBJECTWE:
RODCS-3. I -K4
Given a copy of 'Technical Specifications and a plant mode, determine if rod position indication
components and actual rod positions meet their Limiting Conditions for Operation; if they do not, then the
applicable ACTION statements
DEVELOPMENT REFEKE:NCES:
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT:
None
QUESTION SOIJRCE:
NEW
SIGNPFICANT1,Y MODIFIED
DIRECT
BANK NUMREK FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED !
DIHECT:
New
NRC EXAM HISTORY:
None
DISTRACTOR JUSTIFICACTION (CORRECT ANSWER d'd):
a. Plausible since this would be required in the event ofa loss ofa single indication while operating in
Mode 1 or 2, but u-ith both indications lost in Mode 3 the Reactor Trip Breakers are to be opened.
b. Plausible since this would he required in the event of a loss of a single indication while operating in
Mode 1 or 2, but with both indications lost in Mode 3 the Reactor Trip Breakers are to be opened.
r. Plausible since loss of indication of L N P I may lead to belief that SDM cannot be verified, which
would require Emergency Boratiou.
With both IIRPI indications inoperable in Mode 3,4, or 5, TS requires that the Reactor Trip Breakers
be opened imrtiediately.
d (1.
HCULTY AR'ALYSBS:
COMPREHENSIVE / ANALYSIS
DIFFICTJL'I'Y K4TING:
2
EXPLANATION:
KNOWLEDGE / RECALL
Knowledge of Tech Spec immediate action requirements in the event of a loss
of both DRPI indications
Post Validation Revision
IImis KR( Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
QUESTION:
10
.4 licensed Reactor Operator has failed to meet the required number of hours this past
calendar quarter to maintain an active license.
Assuming all other requirements have been met to activate the license, which of the
following watches completed under instruction would satisfy the requirement to allow
activation of the license?
a.
24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> as the Control Operator during Mode 5 AND 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br /> as the Control
Operator during Mode 4
b.
45 hours5.208333e-4 days <br />0.0125 hours <br />7.440476e-5 weeks <br />1.71225e-5 months <br /> as the Balance of Plant Operator during Mode 5 AKD 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> as the
(ontrol Operator during Mode 4
c. 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> as the Control Operator during hfode 5
d. 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> as the Balance of Plant Operator during Mode 4
ANSWER:
d. 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> as the Balance of Plant Operator during Mode 4
Post Validation Revision
Hatris NRC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
Data Sheets
QUEs'rION NUBIBER: I0
T%ER/GROUP:
3
KA IMPORTANCE:
3.8
80CFR55 CONIENI':
41(b)
43(b)
5
KA:
2.1.1
Knowledge of conduct of operations requirements
OBJECTIVE:
PP-3.1-1
Given a situation, STATE whether or not an off-going operator may be relieved during the shiti turnover
process
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES:
<)?vfM-OO 1
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICAWI':
X m e
QUESTBOiV SOURCE:
NEW
SIGN%FICANI%,Y
MODIFIE:I)
OR SIGNIFICANTLY 1C1ODIPIE:D / DIRECT:
NRC EXAM HISTORY:
None
DISTRACTOR JUSTIFICACI'ION (CORRECT AXSWER .v"d):
a. Plausible since this exceeds the required 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> for the CO or BOP position. but only those hours
when the plant is above 200°F are acceptable.
b. Plausible since this exceeds the required 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> for the C:O or BOP position. but only those hours
when the plant is above 200°F are acceptable.
c.
Plausible since this meets the required 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> for the C:O or DOP position and this has the most
hours in the CO position, but only those hours when the plant is above 200"I" are acceptable.
'/
d. 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> are required in either the CO or HOP position when the plant is above 2.00"F
DIE'FBCCLTY ANALYSIS:
F KNOW'1,EDGE / RECALI.
COMPREHENSIVE / ANALYSIS
DKFFICULTY RATING:
2
EXPLANATION:
Must recall requitxment for activating an inactive license from OMM-OO I
Post Validation Revision
IIarris NKC Writtan Examination
Senior Radctor Operatoi
QUESTION:
1 1
Following a loss of off-site power during recovery from a SGTR, the crew is required to
transition from EPP-019, Post SGTR Cooldown Using Steam Dump, to either:
e
e
Which ofthe following describe how RCS and SG pressure contrd in EPP-OI 7 compares
to that in EPP-0 18?
EPP-017, Post SGTR Cooldown Using Backfill
EPP-018, Post SGTR Cooldown CJsing Blowdown
a.
e
e
EPP-Oi7 maintains RCS pressure below the niptured SG pressure
EPP-01 8 maintains KCS pressure below the ruptured S G pressure
b.
e
m
EPP-017 maintains RCS pressure below the ruptured S G pressure
EPP-OI 8 maintains RCS pressure the same as the ruptured SG pressure
c.
e
e
EPP-017 maintains RCS pressure the same as the ruptured S G pressure
EPP-018 maintains RCS pressure below the ruptured S G pressure
d.
e
e
EPE-017 maintains RCS pressure the sanie as the ruptured SCi pressure
EPP-018 niaintains RCS pressure the same as the ruptured SG pressure
ANSWER:
b.
e
e
EPP-017 maintains RCS pressure below the ruptured SG pressure
EPP-018 inaintains KCS pressure the same as the ruptured SG pressure
Post Validation Revision
Hams NRC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
Data Sheets
QILJESTHON NUMBER:
I 1
TIER/GROUP:
i!I
KA IMPORTANCE:
4.4
10CFRSS CONTENT:
41(b)
43(b)
5
KA:
0OtJ038EA2.08
Ability to determine or interpret the following as they apply to a SWR: Viable ahnatives for placing
plant in safe condition when condenser is not available
OBJECTIVE:
EOP-1.4- I
Describe the purpose of the following EOPs including the type of event for which they were designed and
the major actions perfornied
- EPP-0 I7
- EPP-0 18
- EPP-0 19
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES:
EPP-0 17
EPP-0 18
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT:
Nonc
QIJESTION SOURCE:
SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED
DIRECT
CAN11,Y MODIFIED ,! DIRECT:
-3.4 010
NRC EXAM HISTORY:
Harris 2002
DISTRACTOR .JUSTIFIC:ACTION (CORRECT ANSWER dd):
a.
Plausible since EPP-017 maintains pressnre below ruptured SG pressure, but EPP-018 maintains
pressure the Same as the ruptured SG pressure.
EPP-017 maintains pressure below S(i pressure to allow backfill from the SG to the RCS, while EPP-
018 maintains pressure the same as SG pressure to niininiize SG leakage.
c.
Plausible since either EPP-0 14 or EPP-0 I 8 maiutains pressuix below SG pressure and either EPP-0 I7
or EPP-018 maintains pressure the same as SG pressure, hut this distracter has the correct condition
reveresed.
d. Plausible since EPP-0 I8 maintains pressure the same as the ruptured SG pressure, but P M 17
maintains pressure below ruptured SG pressure.
d b.
DIFFICII1,TY ANALYSIS:
n
COMPREIIENSPVE / ANALYSIS
KNOW12EDGE IRECALI,
DIFFICULTY RATIXTG:
3
EXPLANATION:
Knowledge of differeut mitigation strategies for EPP-017 and EPP-0 I8
Post Validation Revision
IIarris NRC Written Exsmination
Senior Reactor Operator
QI!ESTION:
12
A I.OCA occurred several hours ago. Only one ( i ) Containment Spray Pump is running
due to actions taken in EPP-0 12, Loss of Emergency Coolant Recirculation.
A transition has just been made to FRP-J. 1, Response to High Containment Pressure.
Containment Pressure is 14 psig.
Whish of the following actions should be taken?
a.
b.
C.
d.
Start the second Containment Spray Pump if Containment pressure docs NOi
decrease below 10 psig before exiting FRP-.I. 1.
Start the second Containment Spray Pump since pressure is ahove 10 psig.
Continue operation with one Containment Spray Pump regardless of any increase
in Containment pressure.
Continue operation with one Containment Spray Pump unless Containment
pressure begins increasing, then start the second pump.
ANSWER:
c. Continue operation with one Containnlent Spray Pump regardless of any increase
in Containment pressure.
Post Validation Revision
Harris NRC Written Exanunation
Senior Reactor Operator
Data Sheets
QUESTION NUMBER I2
TIEWGRODP:
112
MA IMPORTANCE:
3.8
lOCPR55 CONTENT:
41(b)
43(b)
5
KA:
WE13E42.2
Ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply to the (High Containment Pressure)
Adherence to appropriate procedures and operation within the limitations i ~ i
the facilitys license and
amendments
OBJECTIVE:
Given the following EOP steps, notes, and cautions, describe the assuciated basis: b. CNMI spray
operation (EPP-012 or FRP-J.l)
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES: EOP-FRP-J. 1
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT:
None
QUESTION SOURCE:
NEW
SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED
DIRECT
BANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY B¶ODIFIED / 1)IRECT:
EIOP-3.13-R4 008
NRC EXAM HISTORY:
None
DISTRACTOR JUSTPFICACTION (CORRECT ANSWVEK dd):
a. Plausible since this would be a normal action directed by FRP-J.1
&.
Plausible since this would be a normal action directed by FRP-J. 1
4 c. EPP-012 directs the operators to run Containment Spray Pumps based upon Containment pressure and
Fan Cooler operation. These actions are taken to minimize RWST depletion. This configuration is to
he maintained even if FRP-J. I is itnplernented.
68. Plausible since woiild better serve the intent of EPP-0 12. but wuuld be contradictory to the inlenr uf
FRP-J. 1 which bas a higher priority concerning the operation ofthe Spray Pumps.
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS:
COMPREHENSWE / ANALYSIS
DIFFLCULTY RATING:
3
EXPLANATION:
0 ELVOWLEDGE / RECALL
Must compare the relative actions in the 2 procedures and make a judgement of
which condition takes precedent
Post Validation Revision
IIarris NRC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
QUESTIQN:
13
During operation at 100% power, an inadvertent SI occurs on 'B' Train ONLY.
Which of the following actions is required?
a. Manually actuate SJ on 'A' Train and continue in PATH-1
b. Continue in PATH-I noting which 'A' Train ESF equipment is NOT running
c.
Start ONLY the 'A' Train of ESI equipment for which the redundant 'B' 'Train
cyuipnient failed
d. Transition directly to EI'P-008, SI Termination
ANSWER:
a.
Manually actuate SI on 'A' Train and continue in PATH-I
Post Validation Revision
IIarris NRC: Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
Data Sheets
QUESTION NUMBER: 13
TIEWGROIJP:
2: I
KA IMPORTANCE:
4.6
10CFR55 CONTENT:
41@)
43(b)
5
ICI: 013.42.01
Ability to (a) predict the impacts ofthe following malfunctions or operations on the ESFAS; and (b)
based on those predictions, use procedures to correct. control, or mitigate the consequences of those
malfunctions or operations: LOCA
OBJECTIVE:
IE-3. IO-K4
Describe the expected operator actions associated with an imminent RPS or ESFAS actuation
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES:
EOP User's Chide
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT:
None
QtJESTlON SOURCE:
NEW
SIGNIFKANTLY MODIFBED
DIRECT
BANK NIMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED / DIRECT:
IE-3. IO-R4 001
NRC EXAM IIISTORY:
Harris 2 0 0
DISTRACTOR JUSTIPICACTION (CORRECT ANSWER d'd):
4 a. Preferred method of manual actuation although it would be acceptable to start / reposition all
equipment which would be actuated regardless of the perceived need since diagnostics have not yet
been performed.
b. Plausible since only a single train actuation is analyzed, but efforts are to be made to initiate both
trains.
Piausible since starting equipment as needed would provide adequate protection, but since diahqIoStiCS
have not yet been completed the equipment required may not yet be known.
d. Plausible since one of the goals following an inadvertent SI is to terminate SI as soon as criteria arc
niet to prevent overfilling / pressurizing the RCS, but procedures are written assuming both trains
started.
c.
ICULTY ANALYSIS:
COMPREHENSIVE / ANALYSIS
DIPFICI!LTY RATING:
3
EXPLANATION:
KNOWLEDGE I RECALL
Required knowledge of procedural requirements for a single train of ESF
actuation
Post Validation Revision
IIarris NKC Written r;xaniinatio,n
Senior Reactor Operator
QUESTION:
14
Given the following conditions:
- 1CS-235, Charging Line Isolation, was closed to establish a clearance boundary for
maintenance on ICs-238.
1CS-235 had to be manually torqued shut.
1 CS-235 is a Limitorye SMB-OO!SR-OO motor-operated valve.
E
Prior to declaring lCS-235 operable after the clearance is removed, the valve must be I..
a.
wrified to have the torque switch calibrated correctly.
b. stroked with the control switch.
c. monitored for seat leakage.
d. n~anually stroked hll open
ANSWER:
b.
stroked with the control switch.
Post Validatioii Revisiun
Harris KRC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
Data Sheets
QIJESTIQN NUMBER: 14
TIE:R/GRQUP:
3
KA IMPORTANCE:
SRQ
3.1
IQCFR55 CONTENT:
41(b)
43(b)
5
KA:
2.2.19
Knowledge of maintenance work order requirements
QBJECTIVE:
PP-2.41
Identify the primary functions and explain the responsibilities of the Work Coordination Centre
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES: OMM-0 14
REFERENCES SUPPLIED r8 APPLICANT:
None
QITESTION SOURCE:
NEW
SIGNHEICANT1,Y MODIFIED
DIRECT
BANK NUMBER FQR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED / DIRECT:
E00 028
NRC EXAM HISTORY:
Harris 2000
DISTRACTOR JUSTIFICACHQN (CQRRECr ANSWER dd):
a. Plausible since the valve has been manually torqued onto the seat, but the requirement is that the valve
must he stroked electrically from the coutrol switch.
v b. ,411 Iiniitorque SMB-OOISB-00 motor operated valves, if manually operatrd, are required to be stroked
electrically from the control switch to he declared operable.
E. Plausible since over torqueing a valve may result iu seat leakage, hut the requirement is that the valve
must be stroked electricalty from the control switch.
d. Plausible since the valve \\vas manually torqued clostU, hut the requirement is that the valve must he
stroked electrically from the control switch.
DIFFICULTY AXALYSIS:
COMPREHENSIVE / ANA1,YSIS
KNQWI.EDGE 1 RECALL
DIFFICXJLIY RATING:
3
EXII,AMAIION:
Knowledge of administrative post-work practices required
Post Validation Revision
Harris NRC Writtcn Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
QUESTION:
15
Given the following conditions:
0
Following 21 Reactor Trip and Safety Injection, a transition has eventually been made
to EOP-EPP-0 15, l.!ncontrolled Depressurization of All S t e m Generators.
Both Main and Auxiliary Feed Flow have been isolated to all SGs.
Directions have just been given to locally isolate steam flows from all SGs.
SC; A pressure appears to have stabilized at approximately 100 psig, while the other
SGs have completely depressurized.
e
a
e
Which of the following actions should be taken?
a. Transition to FOP-EPP-014, Faulted SG Isolation, since this is indication that
SG A has been isolated.
b. Continue in FOP-EPP-01.5 and re-establish AFW flow to S G A at ininimuni
flow.
c. Transition to EOP-PATH-2 if local radiation surveys indicate primary-to-
sccotidary leakage is occurring.
d. Iransition to FOP-EPP-008, SI Termination, to prevent overpressurizing the
RCS.
ANSWER:
c. Transition to EOP-PAIH-2 if local radiation surveys indicate primary-to-
secondary leakage is occurring.
Post Validation Rcvision
Harris NRC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
Data Sheets
QUESllQX NUMBER:
15
'P'IEWGROUR
lil
K4 IMPORTANCE:
3.8
IOCFR55 CONTENT:
41(h)
43(b)
2
Lk 000040G2.1.32
Ability to explain arid appiy all system limits and precautions. (Stearn Iine Rupture - Excessive Heat
Transfer)
OBJECTIVE:
Given a step, caution. or note from an emergency procedure, state its purpose
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES:
EUP-EI'P-0 15
REFERENCXS SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT:
None
QUESTION SOUI1CE:
NEW
SIGN1FIICANTL.Y MODIFIED
DIRECT
HANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED / DIRECT:
New
NHC EXAM HISTORY:
None
DISTRACTOR JUSTPFPCACI'ION (CORRECT ANSWER d'd):
a. Plausible since once a SG is confirmed to be isolated in FFP-OLS, a foldout page item directs a
transition to EPP-014.
h. Plausible since without indications of a SG tuhe leak, actions would be taken to remain in EPP-0 I5
and mainhin feed Row at minimum.
4 e.
A SG may be suspected to be ruptured if it fails to d q out following isolation of feed flow. Local
checks for radiation can be used to confinn prin~aiy-to-~~coiida~-
leakage.
d. Plausible since a desired goal after isolating a faulted SG is to terminate SI as soon as conditions are
met to prevent overfilling and overpressmizing the RCS.
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS:
CQMPREIIENSPVE / ANALYSIS
KYOWLEDGE i RECALL
DIFFICIjLTY RATING:
3
EXPLANATION:
Must analyze the cause of the failure of the SG to depressurize and then
determine thc correct actions based on the analysis.
Post Validation Rwision
Harris NRC Written Exanlinetion
Senior Reactor Operator
QUESTION:
16
The unit has tripped due to a IDCX and ESF equipment has failed to start. As a result,
EOP-FRP-C.2, Response to Degraded Core Conling, has been entered.
A depressurization of the Steam Generators (SGs) to 80 psig is being performed, in
accordance with the procedure, when the STA reports that a Red Path condition fi,r Integrity
has occurred.
Which of the following actions should be taken?
a.
Immediately transition to EOP-FRP-P. 1, Response to Imminent Pressurized
?herma1 Shock Conditions
b. Stop the YG depressurization and, if the red path does not clear, transition to EOP-
FKP-P. 1 . Response to Imminent Pressurixd Thermal Shock Conditions
c. Complete EOP-FRP-C.2 and then transition to EOP-FW-P. 1, Response to
Imminent Pressurized Thermal Shock Conditions. if the red path still exists
d. Complete the SKf depressurization and then transition to EOP-FRP-P. I, Response
to Imminent Pressurized Thermal Shock Conditions, if the red path still exists
ANSWER
c. Complete EOP-FRP-C.2 and then transition to EOP-FIIP-1. i . Response to
Imminent Pressurized Thennal Shock Conditions, if the red path still exists
Post Validation Revision
Harris NKC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
Data Sheets
QUESTION NIJMBER: 16
TIEWGROUP:
I i2
KA IMPORTANCE:
3.8
10CPK55 CONTENT:
41(b)
43(b)
2
KA:
WE06(i?. I .32
Ahiiity to explain and apply all system limits and precautions. (Degraded Core Cooling)
OBJECTIVE:
Given the following EOP steps, uotes, and cautions, describe the associated basis
g. Stopping SG depressurization at 80 pig (C.2)
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES:
EOP-FKP-C.2
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT:
None
Qt!ESTIOX SOURCE:
NEW
SIGNBFICANFLY MODIFIED
DIRECT
BANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICAYlZY MODIFIED / I9IRECT:
New
NRC EXAM HISTORY:
None
DISTRACTOR .IUSTIFICACTION (COIPRECr ANSWER .Id):
a~ Plausible since the red path for integrity has a higher priority than the orange path that caused entry
into EOI-FRP-C:.2, hut under thsse particular conditions a transition should not occur until completion
of the EOP-FRP-C.2.
h. Plausible since the red path for integrity has a higher priority than the orange path that caused entry
into EOP-FRP-C.2, but under these particular conditions a transitinn should not occur until completion
ofthe EOP-FRP-C.2.
During the depressurization, a red path may occur due to injecting the accumulators. A transition
should not be made until the entire procedure has been completed.
d. Plausible since the red path for inte~grity has a higher priority than the orange path that caused entry
into EOP-FIW-C.2, hut under these particular conditions a transition should tint occur until completion
of the EOP-FKIC.2.
d E.
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS:
COMPKEIIENSIVE / ANALYSIS
DIFFICULTY RATING:
3
EXPLANATION:
KNOWLEDGE / RECALL
Must analyze plant conditions to determine that the cause ofthe red path is the
depressurization and that, under these specific conditions, an immediate
transition is not wairanted
Post Validation Kcvision
Harris NKC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
Given the following conditions:
e
a
e
The unit is in Mode 3.
Instrument Buses IUP-1B-SI1 and 1DP-IB-SIV are both de-energized.
Maintenance reports that Instrument Bus IDP-IB-SI1 is ready to be re-energized
In order to prevent an inadvertent Safegaards Actuation, which of the following must be
verified prior to re-energizing the bus and why?
a.
Train A Logic Input Error Inhibit must be verified to be in IIWIBIT due to the
proper coincidence for an actuation being available
b.
Train A Logic Train Output must be verified to be in TESI to prevent an
inadvertent Safeguard Actuation due to the loss of the SI BLOCK Signals
c. Train B Logic Input Etror Inhibit must be verified to be in INHIBIT due to the
proper coincidence for an actuation being available
d. Train B 1,ogic Train Output must be verified to be in TEST to prevent an
inadvertent Safeguard Actuation due to the loss ofthe SI BLOCK Signals
ANSWER:
d. Train 1%
Logic Train Output must be verified to be in TESI to prevent an
inadvertent Safebmard Actuation due to the loss ofthe SI BLOCK Signals
Post Validation Revision
Harris NRC' Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
Data Sheets
QUESTION NUMBER: 14
TIEWGROUP:
21 1
KA IMPORTANCE:
3.4
10CFRS5 CONTENT:
41(h)
43(b)
2
KA: 06262.2.22
Ktiowledge of limiting conditions for operations and safety limits. (.4C Electrical Ilistribution)
OBJECTIVE:
ESFAS-3.0-4
Given applicable logic diagrams and a set of plant conditions, predict how loss of any of the four
instrument buses will affect the ESFAS output functions of each SSFS train.
I)E:VELOPMENT REFERENCES: OP-156.02
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT:
None
QUESTION SOURCE:
NEW
SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED
DIRECT
BANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANT1,Y MODIFIED i DIRECT:
New
NRC EXAM HISTORY:
None
DISTRACTOR JUSTIFPCACTION (CORRECT ANSWER d'd):
a.
Plausible since the loss of both trains of power will provide the proper coincidence, hut power must be
available to the output relays to actuate. Placing the input error inhibit in INHIBIT at this time will
not prevent an actuation since the logic is already made up. Also the incorrect Train.
h. Plausible since the loss of both trains of power causes the SI BIock signals to he lost and when either
of the supplies is restored, power will be available to the output relays to cause an actuation. however
this occurs on Train 'H' for this event.
c. Plausible since the loss of both trains of power will provide the proper coincidence, but power must be
available to the output relays to actuate. Placing the input error inhibit in INHIHI'I' at this time will
not prevent an actuation since the logic is already niade up.
.! d. The loss ofboth trains of power causes the SI Block signals to he lost. When either ofthe supplies is
restored, power will be available to the output relays to cause an actuation.
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS:
COMPREIIENSIVE / ARALYSIS
DIFFICULTY RATING:
3
EXPLAYATION:
KNOWLEDGE i RECALL
Must determine train of SSPS affected by the loss of power and then analyze the
effect of partially restoring power
Post Validation Revision
Harris NKC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
QUESTION:
18
The I Jnit-SCO arid Superitltendent-Shift Operations are discussing invoking
I OCFR51).54(x) during the intplernentation of the Emergency Operating Procedures due
to a condition arising which is NOT addressed by the procedures or Technical
Specifications.
Which of the following conditions must be met when invoking 1 OCFR50.54(x)?
a. The action must be approved by an additional Iicensed Senior Reactor Operator
when the action is necessary to prevent equipnient damage.
b. The action must he approved by the Superintendent-Shift Operations prior to
taking the action.
The KRC must concur with the action to be taken prior to the action actually being
taken.
c.
d. The action must be approved by the Manager-Operations when the action is
necessary to protect plant personnel.
ANSWER:
b. The action must be approved by the Superintendent-Shift Operalions prior to
taking the action.
Post Validation Kevision
Harris NRC Written Examination
Senior Keactor Operator
Data Sheets
QUESTION NUMBER:
18
TIEWGROUP
3
MA IMPORTANCE:
3.3
10CFR55 CQNTENT:
41(b)
43(b)
3
KA:
2.2.10
Knowledge of the process for determining if the margin of safety, as defined in the basis of any technical
specification is reduced by a proposed change, test or experiment
OBJECTIVE:
P1'-2.0-S2
LTS'I the actions required by the individual who authorizes a deviation from the Technical Specifications
or license conditions
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES:
PRO-KGGC-0200
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT:
None
QtJESTION SOURCE:
NEW
SIGNHFICtlRTLY MODIFBED
DIRECT
BANK NIIMBER FOR SIGXIFICANTLY MODIFIED i DIRECT:
INPO 233 I8
NRC EXAM IIISTORY:
None
DISIRACTOR JUSTPFICACTION (CORRECT ANSWER d'd):
a. Plausible since IOCFK5054(x) requires that a licensed SRO approve any actions which deviate from
license conditions prior to performance, but the actions must be to protect the health and safety ofthe
public.
t' b. The minimum level of approvai per PRO-NGGC-0200 is the Superintendent-Shift Operations. but it
can be approved by any personnel holding an SRO license above this position also.
6. Piausible since the NRC must be notified, but the notification requirenients are within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> per AP-
617.
d. Plausible since the Manager-Operations can approve a deviation if he holds an SRO license, but the
actions must he to protect the health and safety ofthe public.
DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS:
COMPREIIENSIVE: / ANALYSIS
DIFFICULTY RATING:
2
KNO\\I'LF:DGE i RECALL
EXPIANATIOX:
Requires knowledge of requirements for process of performing actions nnt
described in any licensing hasis documents.
Post Validation Revision
Harris NRC Written Exanimation
Senior Reactor Operator
QUESTION:
19
Given the following conditions:
Following a Loss ofAll Power, EDG IA-SA has been restarted and partially loaded.
A transition has been made to EOP-EPP-003, 1x)ss of All AC Power Kecovery with
SI Kequired.
EDC 1.4-SA is currently loaded to 4.5 MWe and 3.5 MVAR.
K7hich of the following would result in an LJNACCEPTABLE loading condition for EDG
1 A-SA?
a.
Pick up an additional 0.5 h4.1U7e
- Pick up an additional 0.1 MVAR
b. *
Pick up an additional I .O MWe
e
Pick up an additional 0.5 MVAK
c. * Pick up an additional 1 .S MWe
e
Pick up an additional 1 .O MVAR
ti.
e
Pick up an additional 2.0 MWe
- Pick up an additional 1.2 14.IVAR
ANSWER:
c.
e
Pick up an additional 1.5 MVVe
- Pick up an additional I .O MVAR
Post Validation Kevisioii
Harris NRC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
Data Sheets
QUESTION NIMREIP: 19
TIEWGROUP:
1!1
Kri IMPORTANCE:
4.6
10CFR55 CONTENT:
416b)
43(b)
5
KA:
00005OAA2.14
Ability to detennine and interpret the following as they apply to the Loss of Offsite Power: (lperational
status of EDiGs (A and 13;)
OEJECTIVE:
Given a step, caution, or note from EOP-001, EOP-002, or EOP-003, state its purpose
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES: OP-l S5, Attachment 9
F:OP-EPP-003
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT:
QUESTION SOURCK:
NEW
SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFPED
DIRECT
OP- 155, Attachment 9
RANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED I DIRECT:
New
NRC EXAM HISTORY:
None
DISTRACTOR JILJSTIFICACT1[ON (C33RRECT ANSWER .Id):
a. Plausible since new loading will be 5.0 MWe and 3.6 MVAK. which is just within acceptable limits.
b. Plausible since new hading will he 5 3 MWe and 4.0 MVAR, which is just within acceptable limits,
d E. New loading will be 6.0 MWe and 4.5 MVAR, which is outside acceptable limits.
at. Plausible since new loading will be 6.5 MWe and 4.7 MVAK. which is just within acceptable limits,
DIFFICIJLTY ANALYSIS:
~
~~
COMPREIIENSIVE / ANALYSIS
ICVOWLEDGE /RECALL
DIFFICULTY RATING:
3
EXPLANATION:
Must analpz EDG operability curve to determine whether additional MWc and
MVAR loading is urithin acceptahle limits
Post Validation Revision
IIarris NRC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
QUESTION:
20
h reactor trip occurred due to a loss of offsite power. The plant is being cooled down on
RIIR per EPP-006. Natural Circulation Cooldown with Steam Void in Vessel with
0
0
KCS cold leg temperatures are 190°F.
Steam generator pressures are 50 psig.
RVLIS upper range indicates greater than 100%.
Three CRUX4 fans have been running during the entire cooldown.
Steam should be dumped from all SGs to ensure . . .
a. boron concentration is equalized throughout the RCS prior to taking a sample to
verify cold shutdown boron conditions.
b. all inactive portions of the RCS are below 2M"F prior to cotnplete RCS
depressurization.
c. RCS and SG temperatures are equalized prior to any subsequent RCI' restart
d. RCS temperatures do not increase during the required 29 hour3.356481e-4 days <br />0.00806 hours <br />4.794974e-5 weeks <br />1.10345e-5 months <br /> vessel soak period.
AYVSWER:
b. all inactive portions of thc RCS are below 200°F prior to complete RCS
depressurization.
Post Validation Revision
Harris NRC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
Data Sheets
QIIESTION NI!NBER: 20
TIEWGROUP:
112
ICI IMPORTANCE:
3.8
lOCFR55 (IONTENT:
41(b)
13(b)
2
MA: WE09(i2.1 3 2
Ability to explain and apply all system limits and precautions. (Natunl Circulation Operations)
OBJECTIVE:
Demonstrate the below-assumed operator knowledge from the SHNPP Step Deviation Document and the
WOG ERGS that support perfonnance of EOP actions: Iieterniining that upper head and SG U-tube
temperatures are below 200 "F
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES:
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT:
None
QCESTION SOURCE:
NEW
SIGNHFPCANTLY IIfODIFIEB
DIRECT
BANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED / DIRECl:
EOP-3.8 006
NRC EXAM HISTORY:
None
DHSTRAQ:TOR JUSTKFICACTION (CORRECT ANSWER d'd):
a. Plausible since this action would have been performed in this procedure, hut niust be completed prio~
to depressurizing the RCS below 19(m psig:.
./ h. S G pressure above 0 psig indicates that the SGs are above 200°F. Depressurizing the 1 - 3 3 undcr this
condition will result in additional void formation in the SG u-tubes.
e.
Plausible since RCP operation throughout NC Cooldown is desirable, but will not be performed at this
point in the procedure.
d. Plausible since a soak period is addressed, but only if continued operation of CKIIM fans had not been
maintained.
I)IFFICUI,TY ANALYSIS:
COMPREHENSIVE / ANALYSIS
DIFFICULTY RATISG:
3
EXPIANATION:
KNOWLEDGE /HECALL
Must analyze the conditions and detennine that the entire RCS is not below
200°F and the effect of depressurizing under these conditions.
Post Validation Revision
FIarris NRC Wiittcii Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
QUESTION:
21
During an emergency, a worker has been directed to enter a high radiation area and
perform a repair necessary for the protection of valuable property.
In accordance with PEP-330. Radiological Consequences, the workers exposure
should be limited to . . .
a.
10 Rem WIPE and the entry does NOT require specific Site Etnergency
Coordinator authorization.
b.
10 Rem TEDE and the entry requires specific Site Emergency Coordinator
authorization.
c.
25 Rem TEDE and the entry does NOT require specific Site Emergency
Coordinator authorization.
d. 25 Rem EDE and the entry requires specific Site Emergency Coordinator
authorization.
ANSWER:
b.
10 Rem TEDE and the entry requires specific Site Emergency Coordinator
authorization.
Post Validation Revision
Hanis NRC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
Ihta Sheets
QUESTION NUMBER: 2 I
TIEMUGROUP:
3
K.4 IlbIPORTANCE:
3.3
10GPR55 CONTENT:
41@)
43(h)
4
KA:
1.3.7
Knowledge ofthe process for preparing a radiation work pemiit
OWJEClIVE: EP2O-2h
Identify the tyyes of prntcctive actions for HNP personnel (both on and off-site) and who is rcspniisible
for directing them.
m v E L o m E w r REFE.RENCES: PEP-330
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT:
None
QUESTION SOURCE:
NEW
SIGNIFICAN'IT,Y MODIFIED
DIRECT
BANK SUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED I DIRECT:
New
NHC EXAM HISTORY:
None
DISiZkPCTOR SUSTIFICAGTION (CORRECT ANSWER J'd):
a. Plausible since IO rem 'TEDE for protecting valuable company property. hut S- SO approval is
required.
9' h. Exposure is limited to 10 rem TEDE is the limit required for this activity and S- SO approval is
required.
Piausihle since 25 rem THIF is the limit required for lifesaving efforts. hut the h i t to protect
equipment atid property is LO rem 'TEDE.
d. Plausible since 25 rem TEDE is the limit required for lifesaving effoits, but the litnit tn protect
equipment and property is 10 rem TEDE.
c.
ICIJLTY ANALYSIS:
COMPREHENSIVE I ANALYSIS
DIFFICULTY RATING:
3
EXPLANATION:
KNOWLEDGE I RECALL,
Requires knowledge of the emergency exposure limits and approval
requirements
Post Validation Revision
Harris NRC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
QIJESTION:
22
Given the following conditions:
e
0
Power is cui-rently at 32% during a plant startup.
Instrument Rut: IDP-IR-SIV deenergized as a result ofa fault in PIC' CAR-4.
PIC CAR-4 has been isolated from Instrument Bus SIV and will be deenergized for
approximately eight (8) hours while repairs are being made.
Which of the following actions must be taken?
a. Place ail PIC CAB-4 Reactor Trip instruments in the tripped condition
b. Place all PIC CAB-4 ESI: instrutnents in the tripped condition
c. Place all MFW Regulating Valves in MANUAL
d. Perform a plant shutdown
ANSWER:
d. Perfotm a plant shutdown
Post Validation Revision
Hairis NRC Written Esaniination
Senior Reactor Operator
Data Sheets
QUESTION NL1MBE.R 22
TIERGROUP:
Iil
K A IMPORTANCE:
4.1
IOCE'R55 CONTEXT:
$I(b)
43(h)
2
KA:
000057G2.2.22
Knowledge of limiting conditions for operations and safety limits. (Loss of Vital i\\C
Instrument Ihs)
0WEC:TICT:
Uetemiine the following: a. Consequences of the loss of all power to PIC CAB4
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES:
TS Table 3.3-3, pg 3-IX and 3-27
TS 3.0.3, pg 0-1
REFERENCES S u P r L I m TO APPLICANT:
xone
QUESTION SOURCE: 0 NEW
SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED
DIRECT
BANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED I DLRECT:
AOP-3.24-K4 00 1
NRC EXAM HISTORY:
None
D1STIIAC:TQ)R JUSTIFPCACTION (CORRECT 4NSWER t'"d):
a. Plausible since instrunlent failures require bistables tripped, but they are deenergized to actuate and
are already tripped since no power is available.
b. Plausible sitice instnnnent faiinrees require bistables tripped, but they are deenergizd to actuate and
are already tripped since no power is available.
c. Plausihle since this is the immediate operator action for a loss of Instrument Bus SIII, not SIV
4 d. Loss of all power to PIC' CAB-4 will result in 3 bistable channels of Steam Iine Pressure becoming
inoperable. The 'IS action is io trip the bispables within one hour, but the bistables are energized to
actuare. \\Vithout power awilable, this action cannot he perfoimed and TS 3.0.3 becomes applicable.
ICULTY ANALYSIS:
COMPREIIENSIVE I ANALYSIS
DIFFICULTY RATING:
4
EXPLANATION:
0 KNOWLEDGE /RECALL
Must recognize that energized io actuate histables cannot be placed in tripped
condition without power, thus an entry into 1's 3.0.3 is required. and must
determine the required TS 3.0.3 actions
Post Validation Revision
Harris NRC: Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
QUESTION:
23
During the performance of EOP-PATH-2, the STA reports that the following two (2)
YELLOW path Critical Safety Function Status Trees (CSFST) exist:
- Integrity
e
Heat Sink
Which of the following describes how these YELLOW paths are to be addressed and i or
impletnentcd?
a.
Both must be addressed and implemented, with Heat Sink having a higher priority
than Integrity, as soon as EOP-PA?-2 actions are completed provided IICI other
higher priority CSFSI conditions exist
b. Both must be addressed, but implemented at the discretion of the Superintendent-
Shift Uperations, prior to exiting from the EOP network
Both must be addressed and implanented, with Heat Sink having a higher priority
than Integrity, prior to exiting from the EOP network
c.
tl. Both must be addressed. but implemented at the discretion ofthe Superintendent-
Shift Operations, as soon as FOP-PATII-2 actions are completed provided no
other higher priority (SFST conditions exist
ANSWER:
h. Both must he addressed, but implemented at the discretion of the Superinlendcnt-
Shitt Operations, prior lo exiting from the FOP network
Post Validation Revision
Harris NRC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
Data Sheets
QUESTION NUMBER 23
'I'IEWGROUP:
3
Iiii IMPORTAXCE:
sa0
4.0
IOCFR55 CONTENT:
4B(b)
43Bb)
S
Kh:
2.4.22
Knowledge of the bases for prioritizing safety functions during abnormal/emergency operations
OBJECTIVE:
Describe Control Room usage of status trees as it relates to the following
a. Priority of status trees
b. Rules of usage
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES:
EOP User's Guide
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO AQPLICANT:
None
BANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED / DIRECT:
New
NRC.' EXAM HISTORY:
None
DISTRACTOR JUSTIPICACTION (CORRECT ANSWER d3d):
a. Plausible since they are to be addressed, but only prior to leaving the EOP network and are not
required to he implemented.
4 b. All YELI~.OW-condition CSFSTs should be addressed prior to exiting the EOP network. However, the
operator is allowcd to decide if and when to implement. and whether to complete any YELLOW-
condition I'KP.
Plausible since they are to be addressed, but only prior to leaving the EOP network and are not
required to be implemented.
d. Plausible since they are to be addressed, but only prior to leaving the EOP network and an' not
required to be implemented.
E.
D I B ; w x L r Y ANALYSIS:
COMPREIIENSIVE / ANALYSIS
I)%FFICUI,TY RATING:
2
EXPLANATION:
KNOWLEDGE / REXALI,
Knowledge of the iu$ementation criteria for yellow CSFSTs as directed by
plant procedures
Post Validation Revision
Harris NRC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
QUESTION:
24
Following a loss of a11 AC power, how long are the safety-related 125 VDC batteries
DESIGNED to allow equipment operation'?
a. 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, assuming t)C ioad shedding occurs within 30 minutes of the loss of all
AC power
2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, assuming DC load shedding occurs within 60 minutes of the loss of all
AC power
b.
c.
4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />, assuming DC load shedding occurs within 30 minutes of the loss of all
AC power
4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />, assuming DC load shedding occurs within 60 minutes ofthe loss of all
A S power
d.
ANSWER:
d. 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />, assuming DC load shedding occurs within 60 tninutes of the loss of all
AC' power
Post Validation Revision
Harris NKC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
Data Sheets
QUESTION NUMBER: 24
TIEWGROUP:
lil
KA IMPORTANCE:
3.7
10CF1355 CONTENT:
41(b)
43(b)
2
KA: 00005862.2.25
Knowledge of bases in technical specifications for limiting conditions for operations and safety limits.
(L,oss of DC Power)
OBJECTIVE:
Given a step, caution, or note from EOP-001, EOP-002, or EOP-003, state its purpose
DEVEL.0PMENT REFERENCES:
Tech Spec Bases 3.8.2, pg 8-2
EOI'-EPP-00 I
ADEL-1.P-2.6
REFERENCES SIJPPLIED TO APPLICANT:
None
QUESTION SOURCE:
NEW
SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED
DIRECT
BANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY IWODIFIED / DIRECT:
AIlEL2-6-S I 00 I
NRC E:XAM HISTORY:
None
DIS'FWAC'L'OR JUSTIFICACTION (CORRECT ANSWER +(I):
PLausihlr since this is the time limit which requires actions being taken in accordance with Technical
Specifications, hut the design oftlie hatteries is 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />.
h. Plausihle since this is the time limit u-hich requires actions being taken in accordance with Technical
Specifications, but the design of the batteries is 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />.
c. Plausible since the design ofthe hatteries is 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />, but the design assumes that DC load shedding
occurs within 60 minutes. not 30.
v' d. Batteries are designed to can); required safety related loads for up to 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> without AC input to
carry bus or charge hatter)., assuming that required load shedding occurs withiu I hour.
a.
ICUL'FY ANALYSIS:
COMPREHENSIVE I ANALYSIS
UIFFICGLTY RATING:
3
EXPLANATION:
KNOWLEDGE / RECALL
Knowledge of tech spec basis arid design of safety-related batteries
Post Vdidation Rrvisiou
Harris NKC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
QUESTION:
25
Which of the following actions would be INAPPROPRIATE to pcrforni prior to
direction in an EQP?
a. Isolating AFW flow to a single faulted S G
h. Throttling AFW flow to control a rupkred SG level within the required level band
c.
Securing a ('SIP to prevent overfilling the pressurizer following an inadvertant SI
d. Shutting the MSIVs tu isolate a steamline break which has not resulted in an SI
ANSWER:
c.
Securing a CSIP to prevent overfilling the pressurizer following an inadvertant SI
Post Validation Kcvision
IIarris NRC Written Examination
Senior Reactor Operator
Data Sheets
n
QrJESTION NUMBER: 25
TIERKROUP:
5
KA IMFORlANCE:
3 3
1OCFR55 CONTENT:
41(h)
43fb)
5
KA:
2.4.14
Knowledge of general guidelines for EOP flowchart use
OBJECTIVE:
FOP-LP-3.19-1
Descrihe Control Room usage of the EOP network as it relates to the following: a) Ierforniing steps out
of sequence
DEVELOPMENT REFERENCES:
EOP Ksers Chide
REFERENCES SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT:
None
QUESTION SOURCE:
NEW
SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFPED
DIRECT
BANK NUMBER FOR SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED / DIRECT:
EOI-3.19-RI 0 18
NRC EXAM HISTORY:
None
DISTRACTOR JUSTIPICACTKON (CORRECT ANSWER dd):
a. Plausible siuce this is a numbered step in PATH-I which are normally required to he performed in
sequence, but the EOP Users Guide addresses this as being acceptable.
b. Plausible since this is a numbered step in PATK 1 which are normally required to he performed in
sequence, but the EOP Users Guide addresses this as being acceptable.
V
6. Perfotming steps out of sequence is allowed, but must be done with caution to prevent masking
symptoms or defeating the intent ofthe EOI being used. Although terminating SI early might he
beneficial to prevent filling the pressurizer if the only event is a spurious SI, this may result in further
degradation of the plant if another undiagnosed event is in progress.
d. Plausible since this is a numhered step in PATH-1 which are normally required to be perfomled in
sequence, but the EOP f.Jsers Guide addresses this as being acceptable.
I
I)IFFICUI,TY ANALYSIS:
COMPREIIENSIVE / ANALYSIS
KNOWLEDGE /RECALL
1)IFFICULTY RATING:
3
EXP1,ANATION:
Must differentiate between those actions which could potentially result in
degradation ofthe plant iftaken out o f sequence and those actions which would
likely have little impact on the operators abilities to diagnose other events.
Post Validation Revision