ML16175A373: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 06/23/2016 | | issue date = 06/23/2016 | ||
| title = Acceptance Review - Peach Bottom 2 & 3 - Emergency Diesel Generator Lube Oil Requirements (CACs MF8010 & MF8011) | | title = Acceptance Review - Peach Bottom 2 & 3 - Emergency Diesel Generator Lube Oil Requirements (CACs MF8010 & MF8011) | ||
| author name = Ennis R | | author name = Ennis R | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-2 | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-2 | ||
| addressee name = Hanson S | | addressee name = Hanson S | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| docket = 05000277, 05000278 | | docket = 05000277, 05000278 | ||
| license number = DPR-044, DPR-056 | | license number = DPR-044, DPR-056 | ||
| contact person = Ennis R | | contact person = Ennis R | ||
| case reference number = CAC MF8010, CAC MF8011 | | case reference number = CAC MF8010, CAC MF8011 | ||
| document type = Acceptance Review Letter, E-Mail | | document type = Acceptance Review Letter, E-Mail | ||
| page count = 1 | | page count = 1 | ||
| project = CAC:MF8010, CAC:MF8011 | |||
| stage = Acceptance Review | |||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:From: | |||
Ennis, Rick Sent: | |||
Thursday, June 23, 2016 11:38 AM To: | |||
Stephanie.Hanson@exeloncorp.com Cc: | |||
David Helker | |||
==Subject:== | |||
Acceptance Review - Peach Bottom 2 & 3 - Emergency Diesel Generator Lube Oil Requirements (CACs MF8010 & MF8011) | |||
Stephanie, By {{letter dated|date=June 20, 2016|text=letter dated June 20, 2016}} (ADAMS Accession No. ML16173A371), Exelon Generation Company, LLC submitted a license amendment request for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3. The amendment would revise the Technical Specifications (TS) requirements associated with the storage inventory of lube oil for the emergency diesel generators (EDGs). Specifically, the TS volume requirements for stored EDG lube oil (currently specified in number of gallons) would be replaced with volume requirements based on EDG operating time (i.e., specified in number of days). The proposed changes are based on Revision 1 to Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) Improved Standard Technical Specification Change Traveler TSTF-501, Relocate Stored Fuel Oil and Lube Oil Volume Values to Licensee Control. | |||
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | |||
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | |||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | |||
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1420. | |||
Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation}} | |||
Latest revision as of 22:08, 9 January 2025
| ML16175A373 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom  |
| Issue date: | 06/23/2016 |
| From: | Richard Ennis Plant Licensing Branch 1 |
| To: | Hanson S Exelon Generation Co |
| Ennis R | |
| References | |
| CAC MF8010, CAC MF8011 | |
| Download: ML16175A373 (1) | |
Text
From:
Ennis, Rick Sent:
Thursday, June 23, 2016 11:38 AM To:
Stephanie.Hanson@exeloncorp.com Cc:
Subject:
Acceptance Review - Peach Bottom 2 & 3 - Emergency Diesel Generator Lube Oil Requirements (CACs MF8010 & MF8011)
Stephanie, By letter dated June 20, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16173A371), Exelon Generation Company, LLC submitted a license amendment request for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3. The amendment would revise the Technical Specifications (TS) requirements associated with the storage inventory of lube oil for the emergency diesel generators (EDGs). Specifically, the TS volume requirements for stored EDG lube oil (currently specified in number of gallons) would be replaced with volume requirements based on EDG operating time (i.e., specified in number of days). The proposed changes are based on Revision 1 to Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) Improved Standard Technical Specification Change Traveler TSTF-501, Relocate Stored Fuel Oil and Lube Oil Volume Values to Licensee Control.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1420.
Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation