ML18043A185: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
StriderTol Bot change
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML18043A185
| number = ML18043A185
| issue date = 02/12/2018
| issue date = 02/12/2018
| title = OEDO-15-00479 - 2.206 Petition Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station'S Current Licensing Basis for Flooding - 60-Day Status Report (CAC No. MF6460; EPID L-2015-CRS-0002)
| title = OEDO-15-00479 - 2.206 Petition Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Stations Current Licensing Basis for Flooding - 60-Day Status Report (CAC No. MF6460; EPID L-2015-CRS-0002)
| author name = Venkataraman B
| author name = Venkataraman B
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI
| addressee name = Lochbaum D A
| addressee name = Lochbaum D
| addressee affiliation = Union of Concerned Scientists
| addressee affiliation = Union of Concerned Scientists
| docket = 05000293
| docket = 05000293
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From:Venkataraman, BoomaTo:Dave LochbaumCc:Danna, James; Banic, Merrilee
{{#Wiki_filter:From:
Venkataraman, Booma To:
Dave Lochbaum Cc:
Danna, James; Banic, Merrilee


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
2.206 Petition Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station's Current Licensing Basis for Flooding Day StatusReport (OEDO-15-00479) (CAC NO. MF6460; EPID L-2015-CRS-0002)Date:Friday, February 09, 2018 9:11:00 AMMr. Lochbaum: In accordance with Management Directive 8.11, "Review Process for 10 CFR 2.206Petitions," I am writing to provide you a status update on your petition submitted inaccordance with 10 CFR 2.206, dated June 24, 2015, regarding the current licensing basison flooding for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (Pilgrim). This e-mail provides a statussince my last update to you on December 11, 2017. In the June 8, 2017, update, I informed you that the issue of reevaluated flooding hazardsraised in your petition is currently being considered by the Commission as part of SECY-16-0142, the mitigation of beyond-design-basis event (MBDBE) draft final rule dated December15, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16301A005). Furthermore, given the deferral in theclosure of the Pilgrim flood assessments associated with the March 12, 2012, request forinformation and the Commission consideration of the issues raised in your petition as part ofthe MBDBE draft final rule, the petition review board (PRB) determined that theCommission's decision on the MBDBE draft final rule would likely disposition your petition. As such, once the Commission provides direction on this rule, the staff intends to issue aproposed director's decision reflecting the Commission's decision. The NRC staff is awaitingthe Commission's direction on the rule. Sincerely, BoomaBooma Venkataraman, P.E.Project Manager, NRR/DORL/LPL1Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationBooma.Venkataraman@nrc.gov301.415.2934  
2.206 Petition Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Stations Current Licensing Basis for Flooding Day Status Report (OEDO-15-00479) (CAC NO. MF6460; EPID L-2015-CRS-0002)
}}
Date:
Friday, February 09, 2018 9:11:00 AM Mr. Lochbaum:
 
In accordance with Management Directive 8.11, Review Process for 10 CFR 2.206 Petitions, I am writing to provide you a status update on your petition submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 2.206, dated June 24, 2015, regarding the current licensing basis on flooding for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (Pilgrim). This e-mail provides a status since my last update to you on December 11, 2017.
 
In the June 8, 2017, update, I informed you that the issue of reevaluated flooding hazards raised in your petition is currently being considered by the Commission as part of SECY 0142, the mitigation of beyond-design-basis event (MBDBE) draft final rule dated December 15, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16301A005). Furthermore, given the deferral in the closure of the Pilgrim flood assessments associated with the March 12, 2012, request for information and the Commission consideration of the issues raised in your petition as part of the MBDBE draft final rule, the petition review board (PRB) determined that the Commissions decision on the MBDBE draft final rule would likely disposition your petition.
As such, once the Commission provides direction on this rule, the staff intends to issue a proposed directors decision reflecting the Commissions decision. The NRC staff is awaiting the Commissions direction on the rule.
 
Sincerely, Booma Booma Venkataraman, P.E.
Project Manager, NRR/DORL/LPL1 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Booma.Venkataraman@nrc.gov 301.415.2934}}

Latest revision as of 10:58, 6 January 2025

OEDO-15-00479 - 2.206 Petition Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Stations Current Licensing Basis for Flooding - 60-Day Status Report (CAC No. MF6460; EPID L-2015-CRS-0002)
ML18043A185
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 02/12/2018
From: Booma Venkataraman
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Lochbaum D
Union of Concerned Scientists
Ventkataraman V, DORL/LPLI-I, 415-2934
Shared Package
ML17167A424 List:
References
CAC MF6460, EPID L-2015-CRS-0002, OEDO-15-00479
Download: ML18043A185 (1)
v • d • e


Text

From:

Venkataraman, Booma To:

Dave Lochbaum Cc:

Danna, James; Banic, Merrilee

Subject:

2.206 Petition Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Stations Current Licensing Basis for Flooding Day Status Report (OEDO-15-00479) (CAC NO. MF6460; EPID L-2015-CRS-0002)

Date:

Friday, February 09, 2018 9:11:00 AM Mr. Lochbaum:

In accordance with Management Directive 8.11, Review Process for 10 CFR 2.206 Petitions, I am writing to provide you a status update on your petition submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 2.206, dated June 24, 2015, regarding the current licensing basis on flooding for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (Pilgrim). This e-mail provides a status since my last update to you on December 11, 2017.

In the June 8, 2017, update, I informed you that the issue of reevaluated flooding hazards raised in your petition is currently being considered by the Commission as part of SECY 0142, the mitigation of beyond-design-basis event (MBDBE) draft final rule dated December 15, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16301A005). Furthermore, given the deferral in the closure of the Pilgrim flood assessments associated with the March 12, 2012, request for information and the Commission consideration of the issues raised in your petition as part of the MBDBE draft final rule, the petition review board (PRB) determined that the Commissions decision on the MBDBE draft final rule would likely disposition your petition.

As such, once the Commission provides direction on this rule, the staff intends to issue a proposed directors decision reflecting the Commissions decision. The NRC staff is awaiting the Commissions direction on the rule.

Sincerely, Booma Booma Venkataraman, P.E.

Project Manager, NRR/DORL/LPL1 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Booma.Venkataraman@nrc.gov 301.415.2934

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18043A185&oldid=5026841"