ML18249A128

6 to Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Chapter 2, Site Characteristics, Figures

ML18249A128
Person / Time
Site:	Brunswick
Issue date:	08/13/2018
From:	Duke Energy Progress
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML18249A165	List: ML18249A126 ML18249A128 ML18249A129 ML18249A130 ML18249A131 ML18249A133 ML18249A134 ML18249A135 ML18249A140 ML18249A142 ML18249A143 ML18249A145 ML18249A146 ML18249A147 ML18249A148 ML18249A149 ML18249A150 ML18249A151 ML18249A153 ML18249A154 ML18249A155 ML18249A159 RA-18-0004, Duke Energy Transmittal of Topical Report DUKE-QAPD-001-A, Amendment 43 RA-18-0131, Technical Requirements Manual, Revision 66
References
RA-18-0131
Download: ML18249A128 (75)

Text

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

26 Appendix:

2 Page:

i of iv LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE NUMBER TITLE FIGURE 2-1 GENERAL SITE LOCATION MAP FIGURE 2-2 SITE PLAN FIGURE 2-3 SITE MAP FIGURE 2-4 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OF SITE (1981)

FIGURE 2-5 GENERAL SITE TOPOGRAPHY FIGURE 2-6A EVACUATION ZONES (10 MILE EPZ)

FIGURE 2-6B PERMANENT RESIDENT POPULATION BY SECTOR FIGURE 2-7 LOCATION OF FARMS WITHIN 10 MILES OF THE SITE FIGURE 2-8 LOCAL SITE TOPOGRAPHY FIGURE 2-9 VERTICAL PROFILE AT THE EXTREME MILE WIND FIGURE 2-10 RECURRENCE PERIOD OF FASTEST 1 MINUTE EXTREME WIND FOR SITE FIGURE 2-11 WILMINGTON, N.C. WEATHER SERVICE WIND ROSE FIGURE 2-12 WILMINGTON, N.C. WEATHER SERVICE SEASONAL WIND ROSE FIGURE 2-13 BSEP ON-SITE LOWER LEVEL WIND ROSE FIGURE 2-14 350 FOOT WIND ROSE FIGURE 2-15 44 FOOT WIND ROSE FIGURE 2-16 BRUNSWICK TOWER 350 FOOT CUMULATIVE PROBABILITY OF X/Q VALUES FROM GROUND RELEASE FIGURE 2-17 BRUNSWICK TOWER 44 FOOT CUMULATIVE PROBABILITY OF X/Q VALUES FROM GROUND RELEASE

( -, DUKE ENERGY

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

26 Appendix:

2 Page:

ii of iv LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 2-18 CUMULATIVE PROBABILITY OF AVERAGE X/Q VALUES FOR STACK RELEASES BASED ON 350 FOOT LEVEL COMPOSITE YEAR OF BRUNSWICK DATA (SITE BOUNDARY)

FIGURE 2-19 CUMULATIVE PROBABILITY OF AVERAGE X/Q VALUES FOR STACK RELEASES BASED ON 350 FOOT LEVEL COMPOSITE YEAR OF BRUNSWICK DATA (LOW POPULATION DISTANCE)

FIGURE 2-20 CUMULATIVE PROBABILITY OF AVERAGE X/Q VALUES FOR STACK RELEASES BASED ON 44 FOOT LEVEL COMPOSITE YEAR OF BRUNSWICK DATA (SITE BOUNDARY)

FIGURE 2-21 CUMULATIVE PROBABILITY OF AVERAGE X/Q VALUES FOR GROUND LEVEL RELEASES BASED ON 44 FOOT LEVEL COMPOSITE YEAR OF BRUNSWICK DATA (LOW POPULATION DISTANCE)

FIGURE 2-22 CUMULATIVE PROBABILITY OF AVERAGE X/Q VALUES (1970 - 1971 BRUNSWICK SITE DATA - STACK RELEASE)

FIGURE 2-23 CUMULATIVE PROBABILITY OF AVERAGE X/Q VALUES (1970 - 1971 BRUNSWICK SITE DATA - GROUND RELEASE)

FIGURE 2-24 STORM PATHS FOR HIGH AND LOW STORM TIDES FIGURE 2-25 TIME HISTORY OF PMH AT THE OPEN COAST FIGURE 2-26 STORM FETCHES FOR MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM WATER LEVELS FIGURE 2-27 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT - INTAKE CANAL FIGURE 2-28 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT - DISCHARGE CANAL FIGURE 2-29 CIRCULATING WATER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC GRADIENT FIGURE 2-30 ARTESIAN HEAD AND WATER SURFACE ALONG THE DISCHARGE CANAL ROUTE FIGURE 2-31 LOCATION OF EXISTING WELLS WITHIN A TWO-MILE RADIUS OF PLANT SITE

[HISTORICAL INFORMATION]

FIGURE 2-32 TECTONIC MAP - NORTH AND SOUTH CAROLINA FIGURE 2-33 GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION AT BRUNSWICK SITE (PART 1)

( -, DUKE ENERGY

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

26 Appendix:

2 Page:

iii of iv LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 2-34 GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION AT BRUNSWICK SITE (PART 2)

FIGURE 2-35 EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY - ACCELERATION RELATIONSHIPS FIGURE 2-36 MODIFIED MERCALI INTENSITY SCALE APPROXIMATE RELATIONSHIP WITH MAGNITUDE, GROUND ACCELERATION AND ROSSI-FOREL INTENSITY SCALE FIGURE 2-37 COMPILATION OF EARTHQUAKES - VIRGINIA AND THE CAROLINAS FIGURE 2-38 COMPILATION OF EARTHQUAKES - SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA FIGURE 2-39 ISOSEISMAL MAP - CHARLESTON EARTHQUAKE OF AUGUST 31, 1886 FIGURE 2-40 SEISMIC AMPLIFICATION CURVES - 5 PERCENT DAMPING FIGURE 2-41 SEISMIC AMPLIFICATION CURVES - 10 PERCENT DAMPING FIGURE 2-42 GENERAL PLANT EXCAVATION - PLAN FIGURE 2-43 GENERAL PLANT BACKFILL - PLAN - PHASE 1 FIGURE 2-44 GENERAL PLANT EXCAVATION SECTIONS (PART 1 OF 2)

FIGURE 2-45 GENERAL PLANT EXCAVATION SECTIONS (PART 2 OF 2)

FIGURE 2-46 TEST DATA FOR ALL STANDARD PENETRATION TESTS PERFORMED AT BSEP SITE AS PART OF QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM FIGURE 2-47 PERMEABILITY TEST IN IN-SITU SOIL FIGURE 2-48 PERMEABILITY TEST IN SOIL FIGURE 2-49 SOIL PRESSURE DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN - CASES I AND II FIGURE 2-50 SOIL PRESSURE DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN - CASE III FIGURE 2-51 SOIL PRESSURE DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN - CASES IV AND V FIGURE 2-52 SETTLEMENT OF UNIT 1 REACTOR MAT FIGURE 2-53 SETTLEMENT OF UNIT 2 REACTOR MAT FIGURE 2-54 SETTLEMENT OF UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 TURBINE PADS

( -, DUKE ENERGY

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

26 Appendix:

2 Page:

iv of iv LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 2-55 SETTLEMENT OF UNIT 2 TURBINE BUILDING FIGURE 2-56 SETTLEMENT OF UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 TURBINE BUILDINGS FIGURE 2-57 SETTLEMENT OF UNIT 1 TURBINE BUILDING FIGURE 2-58 SETTLEMENT OF PIPING TUNNEL FIGURE 2-59 SETTLEMENT OF CONTROL BUILDING FIGURE 2-60 SETTLEMENT OF RADWASTE BUILDING AND STACK FIGURE 2-61 SETTLEMENT OF CIRCULATING WATER INTAKE FIGURE 2-62 SETTLEMENT OF SERVICE WATER INTAKE FIGURE 2-63 SETTLEMENT OF DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING FIGURE 2-64 INTAKE CANAL - BORING LOG C15A FIGURE 2-65 DISCHARGE CANAL - BORING LOG C42A

( -, DUKE ENERGY

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-1 Page:

1 of 1 General Site Location Map

(., DUKE ENERGY 0

C, N

l 50

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

25 Figure:

2-2 Page:

1 of 1 Site Plan fa DUKE

~ ENERGY

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-3 Page:

1 of 1 Site Map

(., DUKE ENERGY

-+--'----~--l'---,-'-77:...--~*Mi f /

/ '

I

-/ 1 I

/

- :_,_***l

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-4 Page:

1 of 1 Aerial Photograph Of Site (1981)

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-5 Page:

1 of 1 General Site Topography

,:*-,.-~

-~..,,.,,..,.1,:,,-:-

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-6 Page:

1 of 1 Evacuation Zones (10 Mile EPZ)

(,

DUKE

.... JENERGY Southport Fort Fisher Ferry Village of Bald Head N.C. Aquarium at Fort Fisher ATLANTIC OCEAN N A

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-6A Page:

1 of 1 Evacuation Zones (10 Mile EPZ)

(., DUKE ENERGY lo 0.40.8 1.6 2.4 (WSW)

Brunswick Nuclear Plant c::::J Zone Boundary c::::J 2, 5 & 10 Mile Rings (SW)

(E)

(ESE)

(SE) 180 (SSW)

(SSE)

(SJ

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-6B Page:

1 of 1 Permanent Resident Population by Sector

(., DUKE ENERGY WNW

[ill]

w 12, 767 I ' 393 WSW I 9,304 I '

NW

[ill]

SW 12,0041 Resident Population Miles Subtotal by Ring 0 - 1 230 1-2 1,575 2-3 3,249 3 - 4 1,808 4 - 5 2,138 5 - 6 3,762 6-7 5,724 7-8 5,365 8-9 4,372 9 - 10 5,327 10 - EPZ 1,700 Total:

NNW I s,ss2 I SSW

[Dill Cumulative Total 230 1,805 5,054 6,862 9,000 12,762 18,486 23,851 28,223 33,550 35,250 35,250 N

[ill]

s 11,112 1 w

NNE

[ill]

SSE

[ill]

NE I 1,sos I SE

~

ENE I 2,1ss I E

o *~

ESE

[JI]

10 Miles to EPZ Boundary N

E

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-7 Page:

1 of 1 Location of Farms Within 10 Miles of the Site

(., DUKE ENERGY ll:

w ID

, z 0

f-0 :c 0..

..J c,:

ll:

w c,:

p Q

R s

T u

---

AERIAL FLIGHT LINES---------

r 0

LEGEND

[ l

~

[Ell

~

( }

CENTER OF SITE.

FARMS PER SECTOR GOVERNMENT OWNED LAND MARSH OR BEACHES

( Unsuilable for Farming}

SOUTHPORT CITY LIMITS AERIAL PHOTO NUMBER

NOTE, NO FARMS IN NEW HANOVER COUNTY WITHIN 10 MILE RADIUS 2

SCALE (miles}

3 4

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-8 Page:

1 of 1 Local Site Topography

>\\:~:=.(**.:-.-..-_.....

_. :*,: -'~

I O

It C.. '

l 0

.;s

! ~

......,_..,,...,..r,, i r

l A

N r

I 0

C E

A N

~

~

C I

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-9 Page:

1 of 1 Vertical Profile At The Extreme Mile Wind

(., DUKE ENERGY 180 170 l60 150

!::,140 8

..J Ill >

I~

120 110,....._________.__ _

____.___~___.______,...______.__ _

20 4o eo

• eo 100 120 140 160 1ao aoo HEIGHT ABOVE GROUND (FT)

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-10 Page:

1 of 1 Recurrence Period of Fastest 1 Minute Extreme Wind for Site (ri a:

I 8

a:

~

z a:

1-l&J a:

(., DUKE ENERGY 1000 200 100 50 20 10 5

2 15 20

./

~ v"'

/ v~

I/"

.v

,.V V I/ V V

/

25 30 35 40 50 ED 70 80 90 100 I IO lc:O l30 IIIO '50 FASTEST ONE MINUTE AVERAGE WIND SPEED-MI./HR.

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-11 Page:

1 of 1 Wilmington, N.C. Weather Service Wind Rose 1966-1970

(., DUKE ENERGY w

8. 1 ii = 6. 9 MPH

7. 9 N

s

• 6. 9 1---1----i.-----+----I-------I E u = ALL DIRECTION AVERAGE WIND SPEED NOTE : DIRECTIONAL AVERAGE WIND SPEEDS (MPH)

ARE DISPLAYED RADIALLY WIND DIRECTION (%)

8.0

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-12 Page:

1 of 1 Wilmington, N.C. Weather Service Seasonal Wind Rose

(., DUKE ENERGY WI NT ER (DEC, JAN, FEB, )

8. 1 N

8.0 8.4 SPRING (MAR, APR, MAY) 7.8 7.8 N

7.4 7.5 7.9 w

'"\\.....,-.J.--.+---4--1--IE Wl--1--+-+-+-+-*"

7.

~~-+-+-+--1--,1--1 E ii = 7. 2 s

8.0 SUMMER (JUN, JUL, AUG) 9.0 8rl 8 8.3 9.2 w 1--+-+-+-+-+-*..:

s 7.7 ii=6.2 s

6.7 6.9 FALL (SEP, OCT, NOV) 6.2 6.6 N

6.5 s

6.1

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-13 Page:

1 of 1 BSEP On-Site Lower Level Wind Rose 1976-1981

( ~ DUKE ENERGY u = 8.5 MPH 6.7 N

u = ALL DIRECTION AVERAGE WIND SPEED N O T E :

D I R E C T I O N A L AV E R A G E W I N 'o S P E E D S ( MP H )

ARE DISPLAYED RADIALLY WIND DIRECTION(3/4)

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-14 Page:

1 of 1 350 Foot Wind Rose

(., DUKE ENERGY 8%

I 12%

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-15 Page:

1 of 1 44 Foot Wind Rose

(., DUKE ENERGY E

8%

12%

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-16 Page:

1 of 1 Brunswick Tower 350 Foot Cumulative Probability of X/Q Values from Ground Release

(., DUKE ENERGY

IE

' u

• w 10--S 1/) -

0

~

5 10 20 30 40 50 60 70.

80 90 95 98 PROBABILITY (PERCENT)

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-17 Page:

1 of 1 Brunswick Tower 44 Foot Cumulative Probability of X/Q Values from Ground Release

(., DUKE ENERGY

)

I!

u w

~

0 X

105.,,___-~-----+------+=-----~~~-----,,..,__~----+=-----~-,---~----,,'

2 5

15 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 95 98 PRCBABIUTY (PERCENT)

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-18 Page:

1 of 1 Cumulative Probability of Average X/Q Values for Stack Releases Based on 350 Foot Level Composite Year of Brunswick Data (Site Boundary)

(., DUKE ENERGY 1()6 rt)

I

' u L&J 1/)

0.,

X

>-a:

<t 0 z 0

16HRS a>

72HRS L&J 107 1/)

624 HRS 10~------,--=---,~-=----==-----"=----=--=---=---.....

2 5

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 PRCBABlLITY (%)

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-19 Page:

1 of 1 Cumulative Probability of Average X/Q Values for Stack Releases Based on 350 Foot Level Composite Year of Brunswick Data (Low Population Distance)

(., DUKE ENERGY

,o-5r--------------------

rt)

-6

~ IQ fa U) -

0 X

8HRS 2tflS I HR i

U) i5 i,01

...J 16HRS

~

721-flS

~

624HRS K)-a L....----I.-...L.---'------L-----'-L....-...___...&.----L.----L..----'

2 5

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 PROBAEI L ITV(%)

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-20 Page:

1 of 1 Cumulative Probability of Average X/Q Values for Stack Releases Based on 44 Foot Level Composite Year of Brunswick Data (Site Boundary)

( ~ DUKE ENERGY 10 --------------------------,

~

u w

(/)

~

X 0::

~

z 0 en w

t::

(/)

10-4 11-R 10-5 92HRS 16HRS 624 HRS" 10*6"------L-----L--_.__...,__1..,...._,___,J....._........ _ _._ __

2 5

IQ 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 PROBABILITY(%)

90

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-21 Page:

1 of 1 Cumulative Probability of Average X/Q Values for Ground Level Releases Based on 44 Foot Level Composite Year of Brunswick Data (Low Population Distance)

( ~ DUKE ENERGY r<l

,0-4

~

u UJ

(/)

0 X

UJ u z

~

(/)

0 z

0

~

IO ""5

...J 0..

0 0..

~

0

...J PR<SABILITY (%)

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-22 Page:

1 of 1 Cumulative Probability of Average X/Q Values (1970 - 1971 Brunswick Site Data - Stack Release)

(., DUKE ENERGY I HR 24_HR~S w

(!)

<(

a:

w >

<(

-7..

10

....... ~

2 5

720 I-RS 10 20 3::>

40 50 60 70 PR<:SABIUTY (%)

80

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-23 Page:

1 of 1 Cumulative Probability of Average X/Q Values (1970 - 1971 Brunswick Site Data - Ground Release)

(., DUKE ENERGY 104

._ -~-----72

___ 0 ___ 1-e........,..

-s 10 2

5 --------..... _ ---

10

~

30 40 50 60 70 PROBABILITY,%

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-24 Page:

1 of 1 Storm Paths for High and Low Storm Tides

(., DUKE ENERGY 40' NORTH CAROLINA N

20'

+

10' SITE 50' LONG BAY 40' 30*-----

20' 10' ONSLOW BAY ATLANTIC OCEAN 33~~--..... ----..... --+--...... -....--..... --...... --.... -

40' 30' 20' 10' 50' 40' 30' 20'

'!O' 78°

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-25 Page:

1 of 1

(., DUKE ENERGY Time History of PMH at the Open Coast 23 22 21 -

20 -

19 -

18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11

£ 10 ai 9

QI....

8 7

6 5

4 3

2 1

0

-1

-2

-3

-4

-8

-- Total ref to MSL {0.0ft elev.)

/

Tide ref to MSL (0.0 ft elev.)

/

I

/

/

I I

I I

J

/

I/

/

/

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3 Time {hr)

~ ----

/ V

-2

-1 0

\\

\\

\\

I 1

2

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-26 Page:

1 of 1 Storm Fetches for Maximum and Minimum Water Levels

( ~ DUKE ENERGY 000 11000 11000 0

61.0 1~1.0 1'160 re.l.Y I _, _, _,

&,ALL

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-27 Page:

1 of 1 General Arrangement - Intake Canal

( ~ DUKE ENERGY PLAN-INTAKE C..,llt;&L TYPICAL §ECTION THA.U WATER:,, MARSH TYPI CAL SECT ION THA.U CA~A~

AT SERVICE AQAQ§

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-28 Page:

1 of 1 General Arrangement - Discharge Canal

( ~ DUKE ENERGY PLA.N-DISCHARGE CANAL i *l... r r-*

~ l,C T *

• N ' 1,-2, '

1 t '--~.TTi

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-29 Page:

1 of 1 Circulating Water System Hydraulic Gradient

(., DUKE ENERGY

@**'-"f~ s*t.ve*.iu.(D

{D

~)

(!)

, rl 1r1-'-~--~----~~----r u..Ao'o, J

u

.,~....

.. ~ **, *. :i n To::i"", * *

.,

• i 'tit u.-:12.Ai..,,__.,~~~~

11 * *, 0 :0, t,\\

• 1t1.0*1> *a c...,..,c,.....,...,. -

.......... o:.,: 4'*"".. <.,.,,, h, * *\\. ***

r

. U. H

l.... o, a...,.,,c c:*.. o& \\. *wl.

© r..,... ~~....

I!'.!...-

.. OC Q llGI

L

)..

u.r*,....

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-30 Page:

1 of 1 Artesian Head and Water Surface Along the Discharge Canal Route

( ~ DUKE ENERGY NOTE *

+!Or-------------------'----------------------------,

+8 Z +6 0

I-"

.J

... +4

+2 EL+ 3.1

=r--o.,.__

I t-----~c::::-__ _

EL+I 2 I I

I EL.+1.3 rr--*--"

_/----,

,r-r~7~

r7---"b..:--..L*-1 I

f-"="-e*-*-1 Y

I.

I

-~-

I I

I I

I I

I I

/1 I

I I

I

/

I I

I I

I

/

I I

I UPWELLING I I

r--.,,----;

I I

I I

I I

o::-:===-===......,_..---..P~!.,_-----------------------

""'fL-:'or° - --

l jl. *1}

0 i"

~:f§ zc a:<'i i~

go

~f;~o

~o

~~

i;;;;

~

0 8

0 +

~

0 Sl

~

<<.;e

~

'° 0

0 i

z ii:

~

0..

8 0 0

+

0 0

0 N

I-ilil1!Q_

• -- ARTESIAN HEAD ALONG CANAL AVERAGE ARTESIAN * ~EA.O 01/ER A REACH 0 PIEZDMETRIC DATA POINT

---

CANAL LEVEL AT 8[:j1tJN1NG OF TWO UNIT OPERATION CANAL LfVEL Ai AVERAGE,CR MC>Cl.E AGE,

CONDITION CANAL LEVEL AT EXPECTED PLANT LIFE N

~i

'° 0

9 0

0 i

~~

z

~

i

§

~

~

I i!i

~

g N..:...

+10

+6 z 0 i

.J

+2 0

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-31 Page:

1 of 1 Location of Existing Wells Within a Two-Mile Radius of Plant Site [Historical Information]

( ~ DUKE ENERGY N

~

~._,,

-~ ~

~0=::_,_

_______ _J

t. 0 NG ATLANTIC OCEAN

-.,,- ~/ I~ I

--~09

~

>-/,JI, !i I /

~1

.._,_~----*---.

ICALI -

NEAVES POINT I

4000 l'UT I

0 0

A'TLANTIC OCEAN

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-32 Page:

1 of 1 Tectonic Map North and South Carolina

( ~ DUKE ENERGY CONTOUtS INDICATE TOP OF

--* ':t"==*::11:°--'t:1"=='~~0.. 1..

PALEOZOIC BASEMENT ROCK S LEGEND jii7fnn]

~

Fold1d ond tnru,t fault1dPol1ozoie,oek1 Pncombrlon and Cambrian m,tamorphlc roeh Polto.zoie cr:,,tolline rock, Trio11lc ba1it1dtpoerfs Mojorfca,lt1or,dfault,:o,n

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-33 Page:

1 of 1

(., DUKE ENERGY SEA LEVEL Core Boring No, 9

~

Recent deposits o.nd undlff'erentlo.ted

~

Pleistocene/Pliocene deposits Castle Ho.yne Peedee Confining Unit

[ill Peedee llMestone Peedee (cloy o.nd so.nd>

Geological Cross Section At Brunswick Site (Part 1)

No, 2 No, 1 200 NE

+50 No, B o

-50

-100 I-LJ w

l..

-150

-200

-250 400 600 800 1000 FT,

-300 HORIZONTAL SCALE

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-34 Page:

1 of 1

(., DUKE ENERGY N'J Core Boring No, 6

- SEA LEVEL 0

mm -

100 200 300 400 HORIZONTAL SCALE Recent oleposlts o.nol unollfferer,tlo.teol Pleistocene/Pliocene oleposlts Co.stle Ho.yne Pe>edee Confining Unit Peedee llMestone Peedee Cclo.y o.nd so.nd)

Geological Cross Section At Brunswick Site (Part 2)

No, I No, 7 No, 5 SE SEA LEVEL

+50 0

-50

-100 I-w w

L..

-150

-200

-250

-300

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-35 Page:

1 of 1 Earthquake Intensity - Acceleration Relationships

( ~ DUKE ENERGY soo EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY-ACCELERATION RELATIONSHIPS 100

,... 0. 1,,

10 "l;...

10

,.. 0.011)

i

(.)

z z

0..

C

(.)

(.)

C 1.0 0.9 n

m

er r

m:

a:

JC:

EQUIVALENT MM INTENSITY A-HERSHBERGER (1956) a-GUTENBERG a RICHTER ( 1942)

• C-CANCANI (1904)

'*D-ISHIMOTO (1932)

• E-SAVARENSKY a KIRNOS (1955)

• F-MEDVEDEV ET AL. ( 1963)

• 8-N.Z. DRAFT BY-LAW H-TID-7024 (1963)

• I - KAWASUMI

( 1951)

• J-PETE°RSCHMITT (1951)

• DATA FROM G. A. EIBY (1965)

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-36 Page:

1 of 1 Modified Mercali Intensity Scale Approximate Relationship with Magnitude, Ground Acceleration and Rossi-Forel Intensity Scale

( ~ DUKE ENERGY ABRIDGED MODIFIED MERCALLI INTENSITY SCALE I

I Not felt ucept by a Yff'f few under eopeeially

!a'Vourable circu--.

Felt only by a few penoDI at,-, eopeeially on n n upper ftooN of buildinp. Delicately.._nded objecto may mag.

J-.

m may rock olichtly. Vibration like_.,. of truck.

m Felt quite notic.. bly indooN, eopeeially on upper I Boon of buildings, but many people do not =*

Duration Ntimated.

..:.005-opise it u an earthquake. Standing motor can m:

• tion like heavy truck miking building. Stand-

..llZ During the day felt indoon by many, outdoon by I few. At night ac>me awakened. Dilhea, window,,

inc mowr can rocked noticeably.

4-DI-doora dioturbed; walla make creaking oound. S.n-

sr ll:

Felt by nearly everyone; many awakened. Some I Diaturb&nco of t,-, polN ud oilier tall objedl - -

diehea, windowa, etc., broken ;

• few instances of oometimee noticed. Pendulum clocu may o&op.

lZI cracked pluter; unlltable objeoto overturned.

Felt by all; many !1ightened and run outdooro.

s-

'lZII m Some heavy furniture moved; a few inetallcee of

.. 05-fallen pluter or damaged chimneys, Damage alight.

lZIII Everybody runa outdoora. Damage ne&Jl&lble in I coaoldenble in poorly built o_r badly cieoiined

'lZJI buildinp or good design and construction; oltaht structureo; oome chimney* broken. Noticed by lo moderate in well-built ordinary etructumi; penone drivinc mot.or can.

Damage *ll&ht in epecially deeicned et.ructureo; I Fall of chimne;re, factory *tacka, columna, monu-JZIII COGaldenble in ordinary aubetantial building*

menta, wall** Heavy furniture overtumed. Sand a:

with partial collapoe;.,_, in poorly built *true-and mud ejected in *mall amount.I. CbanCN in -

turee. Panel wall* thrown out of frame stnacturee.

well water. Penou driving motor can diat.urbed.

• Damage conoldenble in *pecially deeigned I partial collapoe. Buildinp shifted off foundatiou.

IX atructures; well deeigned frame structuree thrown Ground crscked compicuoualy. Uoderpound 1-

.5-out of plumb ; a,eat in 111betantial building*, with pipe* broken.

X Some well-built wooden otruetureo_ d..troyed; I bent. Landolide* coMiderable from river banu -

X moot muonry and frame 1tn1clUN!9 de*troyed and *teep *lope*. Shifted *and and mud. Water witb foundation*, ground bedly craeked. Rail*

opluhecl (olopped) over bankL Modified MercaUi Intensity Scale and relationship with Rossi-Forel Scale after Wood and Neumann, 193 1 (Modified Mercalli Intensities XI and XII not included).

Magnitude and acceleration values taken from Nuclear Reactors and Earthquakes, TID-7024, United States Atomic Energy Commission.

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-37 Page:

1 of 1 Compilation of Earthquakes Virginia and the Carolinas

( ~ DUKE ENERGY I

SCALE,

o 25

, 01irnu lilNCJ1MCJ1Mt==::,I LEGEND *

• -v e -m: or greater as noted

(~~ - Approximott Epicenter

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-38 Page:

1 of 1 Compilation of Earthquakes Southeastern North Carolina

(,

DUKE

.... JENERGY 0 Fay1tteviN1 35---4-__;. __ _

Lumberton 79° 78° 0

Limit of Perceptibility Earthquake of March

, 1958

'1ARCH 5, 1958 - llr-"Sl

,__,,,..,.JANUARY 19, 1860-m APRIL 16, 1871 -m

\\

-+--1------ 34°

\\

NOV. 2 2, 1927 - 'Dr' 77° e - EARTHQUAKE EPICENTER 0

10 20 30Miles 78°

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-39 Page:

1 of 1 Isoseismal Map Charleston Earthquake of August 31, 1886 I

fa DUKE

~ ENERGY I

/

,,.,;:__ /

II/,

ff7*

/

/BIRMINGHAM 33*

o I

"//

i</

0 ATLANTA 87° ~

ALA//

/GA.

/

I I

85° 79*

I SCALE o

20 4f 60 ep MILES 1887*88 LEGEND:

TENSITY, AFTER DUTTON 7 -

ROSSI - FOREL IN RELATIONSHIP OF MODIFIED MERCALLI INTE:~~S~ ~ FOREL INTENSITY

-1ZI.- MODIFIED MERCALLI TO OOD (1931).

AFTER NEUMANN AND W

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-40 Page:

1 of 1 Seismic Amplification Curves 5 Percent Damping

( ~ DUKE ENERGY SOUTHPOR~ NORTH CAROLINA CASE I 5% Damping 4 Layers - 4 0 feet stripped 0

=....

Layer Thickness ft 2

30 3

43

,,:, : :* **

• 1 1::-:

~-.. -* *-* - --

• ,::i::: *...........

4 127

~ -:

-11

";* **;::: ---. ~--* ::::J:*::-:: :::_:*: :.::- ;:;;* :::.~~~~~::~~ -~:-~~:~:~~~~~~:;

f:::: =*, :f l r ::;j \\ :

.... : :.:..:-:.. :. ::.;*:.:::*..... _ :::= =:-.::*~_i_;:;~~

• ;:~i1:: ~i \\J '.i ~xl'\\l :::ci,: :;:, ~:-~,i--~;~c:.":* ~-'i:::::*

5 1290 basement rock

~: ;: : :::: '.'i :,:. *,, ~ " ~~:?i :c,; ~* "'.:,*~ -., :~.;,,;;.*** -:::.c.

• • ,::......~: ::.;

t::2;_;:_*;~~:

FIGURE B

~j~~;=~~-*: -~~_-;:;:-. _£ ::..:.::--: *_:_*:... -~-~:-=l==t-.::::I:;.* *r-r-+

rr:='.....,:~=~::::::' "*:: * :' Ei:= - = =*.

~-:: :;:~ ~i]~-~:* ~~:- _***:.f=:*. ~-:. *::_-*==: :~ =--

- ---= -

"P"Wave Vel ft/ sec

"$"Wave Vel ft/ sec 5,000 1,400 11,900 5,500 9,500 4,500 7,100 3,000 18,000 10,000 (Refer to page 20)

CASE I 5% Damping 0

~ 5 ~( ~~!~ ~?~~t:*:. :i~ *:?~;-~-:_-:-~-; :

~ *~ ~::-~~ -:~-==

~

_:-_f:: --!~~ -~~~~::4:~~~==~~, :~==--*'.:=-=-:: :-£~--

5 Layers - 5 feet stripped

~~ _:_\\ Z~-t~~::~ ~:::~-~~:---~:f:E :: ~J~;1 ;::}-:-~==* ~!=i:J ~~-= ~

Layer Thickness

-* :. :: :~,: ~= ~;~; ;

C: ~':..:L:: ~~- *-

• !'c'-=.

ft

• .s.: ::; ::: =.:::~t,,r*:-:: ::',~~

• -*,:-::: :::;- =--

l 35

~,

,:,." i.. ** *, n: :: *,... ""'F:. E,=.'*-,;:-.~ *...:,.**'..... *-

• 2 30 r, ' :: l

• flD: ;i.i',,J;,:.f:£ :::: * ; ~, -,. - =: "= :* -.:.-..

3 43 4

127 5

1290

,.,:~t,\\:dl:\\::lf# ;::.:_=1=:.:.~~:::.;:_:*..:::=-*.::.. :::**==' *

~.:-,Jt-'/J Xl/-:,~~~,=;:,E..-' =~'==I::=~ *,.,:c:c;*-': ::_, =~:=~~ -:'L:::C:,.==-== basemennock I ;:-=; _::;.:~.- -~~;-t::~.:: --:!J~~i; **-~ --~~~~~-=- :~~ :._~--

t:

!:':;;~:: ::,::~ < ::::.r:~,..::: ' :: ., ::':,= ::':: :* '~~ *. c: '-'..

r1~-~:.:~:*:1~;i:

FI GURE A

=:r~;: ;~-~;:~~~*;:~:r~.~l~""7...:.~~: ~-;;. - ---~- -__._.::::'

~.:_::.;:cc, ::~,t **** :*::,;;!=':~:::~ **,:=::c=.:;,-~:,::::::.:; -:~-:-* ::-**r.::.:: **. =:..

"P"Wave Vel ft/ sec "S"Wave Vel ft/ sec 5,000 750 5,000 1,400 11,900 5,500 9,500 4,500 7,100 3,000 18,000 10,000 (Refer to page 2 0)

Density lbs/cu ft 130 145 138 130 165 Density lbs/ cu ft 107 130 145 138 130 165 1(1) 2(.!11 3UI 4(.251 51.201

'5tll) 7(.14) 1(, 13) t (.II)

JOLI) 11(.0tl 12.(.01) 15(.0IJ 14(.01) 1&1.07) 11(,011 17(.01) 11(.01) 11(.0I) 10(.09)

FREQUENCY (PERIOD)

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-41 Page:

1 of 1 Seismic Amplification Curves 10 Percent Damping

( ~ DUKE ENERGY 0

0

~

0:

0 ::,..

2..

SOUTHPORT, NORTH CAROLINA

.... -:::~~:t-

• • • ..... -~:.~ =-_- '. ~Fs.~=7=~ --* :-; -~

.. ;~~ -__ :_~_'":;-*:~.

~:;.;:+=:-::*~=.. = -:=.::. *_::=:=-=-~:f:~>::=: :-*~;.~::-.::: -==~-.

~--= ;;; ~-::-:.:E;;§;_::::~-~~;~. -.. :.=- :~~~ =~:.-~ ~ ~~ ;*;- ~~ ~ -;_:.t~*:.::..:* :-

~ ---*

Layer 2

3 4

5 CASE I 10% Damping 4 Layers - 4 0 feet stripped Thickness 11 P"Wave "S"Wave Vel Vel ft ft/sec ft/ sec 30 5,000 1,400 43 11,900 5,500 127 9,500 4,500 1290 7,100 3,000 basement rocx::

18,000 10,000.

(Refer to page 18)

FIGURE B

=::: ~ ;-**

t-::*

CASE I 10% Damping 5 Layers - 5 feet stripped Layer Thickness "P"Wave 11 $ 11Wave Ve!

Vel ft ft/ sec ft/ sec

"+

l 35 5, 000 750 2

30 5,000 1,400 3

43 11,900 5,500 4

127 9, 500 4,500

-~-

5 1290 7, l 00 3,000

- -~

.:" 7

,:1 ~~-,#L.

clc::_;: ~::"E-c

- _**t-= 3~~

basement rock 18,000 10,000 (Refer to page 18)

FIGURE A c:**§-=-=----~EC *.§c. *

i::::= :i::::::=

'.t:-........; - :::."1:~ :r~

Densiti, lbs/ cu ft i3o 145 138 120 165 Density lbs/ cu ft 107 130 145 138 120 165 IO J 2(. 15) 3(.3) 4(.25)

St.2) ll.11)

T(.141 t(.l;J)

IC.Ill 10(.1),

11{.0t) 12(.0I) 11(.0* )

14(.07)

Ul(.OTJ 11(.01) 17(.011 *t.OaJ 1*(.0S) IO(,OI)

FREQUENCY (PERIOD)

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-42 Page:

1 of 1 General Plant Excavation - Plan

( ~ DUKE ENERGY

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-43 Page:

1 of 1 General Plant Backfill - Plan Phase I

(

I **"*'

~..... -*

I I

~

.,,. i/

~~:~

--=- ~~-

~

i

¥...,.* * ~--* --- ---~ --.:I,)f. -~

I I

I I

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-44 Page:

1 of 1 General Plant Excavation Sections (Part 1 of 2)

( ~ DUKE ENERGY

11

j i

~ '

~

.. ~*-'-"'-\\.---.-,~~~~,,.,..j,,""-1""'--'~L----il I

,. tj I

i

~

i i

'T

• Ui!*** H lfh l *** '0' I ---~~?:

1 I

81t&1Pf-b,1thP *:1e

""--1,_

t:

r." t r:m -"!'\\/I' *-t*::::~~-::.~:.;:1"**,:.:;;;;,. *:::;~:;:;:. {.. ":.a:""'"~,..

m u..... '~"" **,.,,.,, -*'"'.......,,_,. **.*,.....,......,...,_,., -~*7.-o CJ,. h~.,,.,,..,.. __

.; h.,.",._"'",,.~.~** *;._.

: ::,fl t,*'":$)

c;:a ~.., **,,,........ u.,,,,...................,,..........,.....,.,.....,......,

• "':::.*., '<)/; ~;;.. ~'"* -=~;_:, ~:-'~~:'-::_... ~!~ ;;" (~:,.~~';,._,,_,, U T eza **-:;:,*.;o~.. *:;,:,;:~..=;;:.*:-,:.~*~*;.~-:,,6 _,.;.:;~.ir) w

_ m,

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-45 Page:

1 of 1 General Plant Excavation Sections (Part 2 of 2)

( ~ DUKE ENERGY f

i

~ ~*_,._.,,.o*

\\.--------

mrnm ~~---* £**

-'"'"'r=~~~~~.J:::-*'

T

,..,,.6,

.... 1 5fCTi9N (.*(.

.,.., **.*, TP,!*"!'

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-46 Page:

1 of 1 Test Data for All Standard Penetration Tests Performed at BSEP Site as Part of Quality Assurance Program

( ~ DUKE ENERGY 1_

U... TU'!OhfWO -

L~,cr-a.,. OH -.

l~--~***

5:"~~~7£.::=

l'(NCTlU,TO'IIIUUSAL IIICSISTANCt.llHD,,UCflCJrt*i1..

..:JIICIIDff l)lt!Y(N lrl INC.MES.

Sc.Alf

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-47 Page:

1 of 1 Permeability Test In Insitu Soil

(., DUKE ENERGY A) FALLING HEAD METHOD K= 2L(~z~t,).in <-h,>..fn <,ff-~>

WHERE K = PERMEABILITY r = RADIUS OF STANDPIPE L = LENGTH OF TEST POCKET R = RADIUS OF TEST POCKET=RAOIUS OF CASING H1 ANO H 2 = WATER HEADS AT TIME T1 ANO T2 Jn = NATURAL LOGARITHM B)OONSTANT HEAD METI-OD K=&

WHERE Q z FLOW OF WATER TO KEEP H CONSTANT H :;: HEAD DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WATER INSIDE CASING AND GROUNDWATER LEVEL(TEST ZONE BELOW GROUN>WRER LEVEL).

C = TEST FACTOR, OEPENDING*ON LANO R D

C,,,.,

0

-0,,,*

L I

I I

I I

I Q

• 0 0

0 0

CASING 0

~

0 0 -

0 0

0 0

I I

~ <9TEST I.-,,- POCKET

.: zs : *

---

I... --'

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-48 Page:

1 of 1 Permeability Test in Soil

( ~ DUKE ENERGY IOr OR GREATER H

2r CASING

--BOTTOM OF CASING GROUND WATER TABLE A)coNSTA~ ~

METHOD K -

5.5rH WHERE 0 = FUJW OF WATER TO KEEP H CONSTANT H =DIFFERENTIAL HEAD OF WATER( DISTANCE BETWEEN WATER LEVEL IN CASING AND BOTTOM OF CASING).

r = INTERNAL RADIUS OF CIISING BlcONSTANT HEAD METHOD

= COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY, FEET PER YEAR

= HEIGHT OF WATER IN THE WELL, FEET

~ ~[ ~Rt Uv.1.TER FROM THE WELL FOR

= ~~t&r1Nt}EWA~~1lfOM~~i1utr rR MINU'TE

= VISCOSITY OF WATER AT 2o*c

= UNSAT~ATED DISTANCE BETWEEN THE WATER SURFACE IN THE WELL AND THE WATER TABLE, FEET

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-49 Page:

1 of 1 Soil Pressure Diagrams for Foundation Design - Cases I and II

(., DUKE ENERGY C:ASE I ACTIVE PRESSURE Wt1'H SUR~. g, ABOVE GROUNDWATER LEVEL Ground W.L

• ----/\\, v-b

\\

\\

\\

NOTE:

• The units for are in KSF.

e Pq

• Surcharge pressure* Kaq

• 0.26q Psl* Soil pressure *.KaYtHl

• 0.033H1 Ps2* Soil pressure*Xaysubm.H2*0,016H2 Pw

• Water pressure* Ywff2

• 0.0624H2 Sand submerged fill:

Wet Unit Weight* Yt

• 0.125 KCF Saturated Unit Weight~ Yt

• 0.125 KCF Submerged Unit Weight* Ysubm.

• 0,063 KCF l-sin$

• 36"

• Ka

• l+sinf

• 0.26 For 0,08g earthquake. increase Ka to 1.17 Ka For 0,16g earthquake. increase Ka to 1,36 Ka CASE II ACTIVE PRESSURE WITH SURCHARGE,q, BELOW GROUNDWATER LEVEL Surcharge Pressure Applicable Conditions:

1. ae > be 2,

ae ~be but the weight of soil ac is less than q.

3.

If be>;:,, ae, the pressure diagram should be the sum of P sl + l',.2 + P w of Case I and P of Case II q

p

• Surcharge pressure

• Ka q' q

• 0.26q' where q'

• q - (H2-H3)Yw P w

• Water pressure* YwH2

• 0,0624H2

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-50 Page:

1 of 1 Soil Pressure Diagrams for Foundation Design - Case III

.-4

.-4 iz.

.-4 co...

u

<J :,...

u ti).,,

c::

<O ti)

(., DUKE ENERGY

-=

Hi CASE III PASSIVE PRESSURE WITH SURCHARGE, g, AT GROUNU SURFACJ::

KSF For Soil Properties, See Fig. 12,3-5

µ *. !:sl *1 P82

• 0,24H2

• IPw *0.0624~f 3.85q 0.48H1

• !+sin¢..

KP 3.85 1-sint P

Surcharge pressure q

• Kpq

• 3.85q P81

• Soil pressure* KPytHl 0.48H1 P8 2

• Soil pressure* Ky H2 P subm

• 0.24H2 Pw

• Water pressure* Yw1i2 0.0624H2 NOTE:

The units for these pres-sures are in KSF.

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-51 Page:

1 of 1 Soil Pressure Diagrams for Foundation Design - Cases IV and V

(., DUKE ENERGY CASE IV AT-REST, PRESSURE WITII SURCHARGE, g 1 ABOVE GROUNDWATER LEVEL For Soil Properties, See Fig. 12.3-5 i

• 36°, K0

• 1-Sini

• 0,41 Pq

• Surcharge pressure* K0q

• 0.4lq P81

• Soil pressure* K0 ytHl

• 0.051H1 Ps2

• Soil pressure* K0 ysubm,H2

• 0.026H2 Pw

• Water pressure* ywH2

• 0,0624H2 L_L _ _j~===:::::r======~ For 0.08g earthquake, increase K0 to 1.17 Ko For 0,16g earthquake, increase K0 to 1.36 K0

- psl

• q 0.026H2 Ground a

b?

\\

\\

\\

\\

J H2 H3

~

AT-REST PRESSURE WITH SURCHARGE, g 1 e

Surcharge Pressure BEI.OW GROUNDWATER LEVEL Applicable Conditions:

1. ae,.. be

2.

ae s be but the weight of soil ac is less than q,

3. If be>> ae, the pressure diagram should be the sum of Psl + Ps2 + Pw of Case IV and Pq of Case V Pq

• Surcharge pressure* K q 1

- 0.4lq I 0

where q 1

• q ~ (H2-H3)yw P8

• Soil pressure* Ky b H3 0,026H2 0 SU m Pw

• Water pressure*ywH2 0.0624H2

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-52 Page:

1 of 1 Settlement of Unit 1 Reactor Mat

( ~ DUKE ENERGY

c..,

Q JAN i

,.. 2~----.=n1r--1----1----r---1------1------1------+---+---+---+---+---+---~

J......

Ill

!i

--- UNIT I REACTOR MAT INT A UNIT I REACTOR IIIAT POINT B l.fllT I REACTOR lillT POINT C 12-~~~--------------------------------------

~

.L..i..!i.UI..I

--- UNIT I MACTOR IIIAT POINT 0

---

UNIT I REACTOR MAT POINT E ti

• ** UNIT I R£ACTOII lillT POINT F

J,___.____..__._._....___..__,~..__.__,___,.___.______.___._._....___..__,.__..__.__.__.__....,____.___._.__.____.___,.__..__.__.__._...___..__._._....__.............__..__,

--'lQIL PERMANENT BENCH : MARK Alfi 11115 SURVEY IS DEEP WELL CASING NO. 10. AU. DATA SHOWN IS RIIN SURVEY DATA REFERENCED FIIOM AND TIED-IN TO WELL CASING N0. 10.

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-53 Page:

1 of 1 Settlement of Unit 2 Reactor Mat

( ~ DUKE ENERGY

(/)...

r

()

~

~

z r

~ 2 I-- -,L"""E"'GE"'N""o,+--

~

(/)

--- UNIT 00. 2 REACTOR MAT POINT I

---

UNIT NO. 2 REACTOR MAT POINT 2

• • • • ** ** ***** UNIT NO. 2 REACTOR MAT POINT 3

• • • • • • • • ~--. **** * *

• • • • • • • • • • ~.

3 '---'----'---'------'------'-'----'-----'---'------'------'-L--'---...L--'----'--------J..--'-----'---'----'--------.L..-'---....L--'------'-'----'----'---'----'------'-.L..-'-----'---'-----'---------'---'

(/)...

r

)I!

1970

...l.fli.El1P..

UNIT I'<<>. 2 REACTOR MAT POINT 4 UNIT 00. 2 REACTOR MAT A:>INT 5

• • • *** * **** ** UNIT NO. 2 REACTOR MAT POINT 6

---

-*----+---- ----

f-----+- -------- - -*--*-------

--- ---+----

---1----------l--------l--------1

---

1l.QIL_

PERMANflff BENCH MARK FOR THIS SURVEY IS DEEP WELL CASING ti). 10. ALL DATA SHOWN IS RM SURVEY DATA REFERENCED FROM AM)

TIED-IN TO W£U CASING N0. 10

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-54 Page:

1 of 1 Settlement of Unit 1 & Unit 2 Turbine Pads

(., DUKE ENERGY i

0 **

1970

[l(C I A

! 2~-.---,Miint----r--------t- --t------r- --r--------t---j------r--,----;---1------r---1

~

-- UNIT TURBINE PAD POINT A ti

---

UNIT TURBINE PAD POINT B en

• UNIT I TURBINE PAD POtNT C 1970 1971 0 r"¥">.Lr'....

""'!r'...

""r'"... "r'"tl'!l:~~;:i/el'~-::io=*=cf'=.. =x:'=*=z:-=r:*="':i;.. =::i:-::;*¥-::;':i::-=f.. ='='FDC='::c=::i:::;:j::::"=r"f!C",r""'-f'7""f'"--f:1L!r"'¥""il""'f"'-r!..Uri'=r'-f'7 i

~ 2

..J

.umm:,t----+---+----t----t----t-------+---+----t----t----r----+- --+----f

-- UNIT 2 TURBINE PAD POINT A I-I-II)

---

UNIT 2 TURBINE PAD POINT B*

• UNIT 2 TURBINE PAD POINT C 3._...__.___.___._...___.__.___.___._...__...___.___.___._...__..._...,__.___._...___.__.___.___._...__...___.____,___._...__...__.____,___._.,__......__.____,___._....__._~

~

PERMANENT BENCH MARK FOR nus SURVEY IS DEEP WELL CASING NO 10. ALL DATA SHOWN IS RIW/ SURIIEY DATA REFERENCED FROM ANO Tl ED-IN TO WELL CASING NO. 10

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-55 Page:

1 of 1 Settlement of Unit 2 Turbine Building

( ~ DUKE ENERGY 1970 I

1973 Q JAN FEB MAR &PR MAY JUHE JUL'( AUG SlPT OCT NOV O( C I JAN JAN FEB MAR APfl MAY JUNE

~--+-

-+---+----+----+------t-~-----t~------~'-----+---1r-,,"..,__t---y-+---+-------t

-- UNIT 2 TURBINE BLOG. POINT 6

\\.-

/

---

UNIT 2 TURBINE BLDG. POINT 8

\\

---.,...L--'

UNIT 2 TURBINE BLOG. POINT 9 UNIT 2 TURBINE BLOG. POINT I 0 3 L.......JIL-..ol_..,_

l_.,_1_.__I..Jl_..,1_..,_

1_,_I_IL-..ol_..,__.,_1_,_1...JIL-..ol_..,_

1....L._IL-..ol_..,__..,_

1_,_1..,____.1_~~"1'--'-'-I...JIL-..ol_..1.I_.L...

l....1.._,l._..,1_..,__.,_

l

....1..__._..,__.__..,

1971

/°.

1972 1973 1970 O.l&N Ft:1 MAR APR MAY.llMf

t AUG V"P'f OCT lnV Of"C JAN FCI MAR APR Ml,Y JUN[ JULY AUG EPT' *QC,>.,;_.,.., ~

JAN FEB MAR PA MAY JUN( JU..Y AUG Sf" OCT NOYD CL... FE* IIIH Al"tl UY..11.M

, --...:.:.:..... ~

l'l~.

---

-~~~~~1 -~~~

--~--

~ 2

.ilil!IQ.

..J,_,_

-- UNIT Z TURBfNE BLOG. POINT 11

• -- - -* UNIT 2 TURIIINE BLOG. POINT 12

• • * ** * ** UNIT 2 TURBINE BLOG. POINT 13 3 I-~~-~~-~~~'-~~~~~~-~~~~~~-~~~-- J._...J.._JL-.J...-L-.1.-....L._J*'L-..L--'--.1.-....1.._JL-..L--L-.L......L._JL-.J...-'--.__,

...1lQ!L_

PERMANENT BENCH MARt< FOR Tt*IIS SURVEY IS CE. £P WELL CA~NG NO. IO. ALL DATA SHOWN IS RAW SURVEY DATA REFERENCED FROM ANO TIED*IN lO \\11:LL CASING NO. 10.

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-56 Page:

1 of 1 Settlement of Unit 1 & Unit 2 Turbine Buildings

( ~ DUKE ENERGY

z: u I-z

!II.....,

I-I-...

2 3

1970 IEPT OCT NOY DE:C L.N FEB MM APR MAY 1971 197Z 1973

-- UNIT 2 TURBINE BLOG. POUn 14

---

UNIT 2 TURBINE BLOG POINT 15

• UNIT I TURBINE BLDG. POINT 16 1970 1971 1972 1973 0 r,'=-r='r-'-"i""'~i.....

=TJIL='-r"""=,="~PT"TOC~TT..,""'"'C't"JAH=r~"=r...

=*-r-=,=""~-r'""'=;r=JOC~Y'r=r'~*~**'Toc=*-r"°=vrot:=C1r.,.~*y*~.. T*~**r*""4*F-r=r=;w.rr=r"r=i=-r,=-r*~*~*r-=r"'~"i.,....F,

z:

~

!z

!II 2 I-I-...

-- UNIT I TURBINE BLDG. POINT 17

- --- UNIT I TURBINE Bl.DO. POINT 18 UNIT I TURBINE 81.DG. POINT 19 NOTE :

~ANENT BENO< MARK FOR THIS SURVEY IS DEEP WELL CASING NO 10. ALL DATA SHOWN IS RAW SURVEY DATA REFERENCED FRON ANO TIED-IN 11) WEU. CASING NO.ID.

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-57 Page:

1 of 1 Settlement of Unit 1 Turbine Building

(., DUKE ENERGY 1910 I

Q JAN fE 11M.&Pfl MAY JUNE JULY AUi SO'T' OCT NOV D(C JAN Ff8 MAR AJ!tl MAY

i:: u

~

!ii 1971 MAR APR

! 2~-................d-- --+----+---t----+----+----+---t----+----+----t---+---+-----i

.J I-ti

i::

~

!ii.., a..,

.J...

t-..,

0 2

3

-- UNIT I TURBINE BLOG. POI 20

- - - - UNIT I TURBINE BLOG POINT 21

• • • ** *** * *

• UNIT I TURBINE llLDG. POINT 22 1970 11MR APR MAY JI.N(

f AUG KPr OCT

--UNIT TUll* INE BLOG. POINT 25

---

UNIT TURBINE BLDG. POINT 24 UNIT TUIIIINE BLOG. POINT 25 1971 T NOV DEC JAN FH IIAlt Al'R

_!ill!L PERMANENT BENCH MARIC FOR THIS SURVEY IS DEEP WELL CASING NO 10. ALL DATA SHOWN IS RAW SURVEY DATA REFERENCED FROM AND TIED-IN TO WELL CASING ND.1O.

1973 AN ffl MAit APII ll&Y JUNf.

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-58 Page:

1 of 1 Settlement of Piping Tunnel

(., DUKE ENERGY 0

en w 0 !

I-z w 2 w

.J I-I-

en 3

0 en rt!

z 2

2 w

.J......

en 3

JAN FEB IIAR APR MAY JU~9~

AUG S(pf OCT NOV DEC I J... N FEB MAR

-- PIPING TUNNEL POINT I P

---

PIPING TUNNEL POINT 2P PIPING TUNNEL POINT 3P' 1970 JAN FE MAR A.PR MA't Jl.ltE,ll..Y AUG SEPT OCT

--PIPING TUNNEL POINT 4P

- --- PIPING TUNNEL POINT 5P PIPING TUNNEL POINT 6P 1971 1972 IIMY JUNE y AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC I JAN FU MAR APR IIIIAY.uNl JULT AUG S(f'T OCT NCN D C I JAN ff NOTE c

~ANENT BENCH MARK FOR nllS SURVEY IS DEEP WELL CASING NO IO. ALL DATA SHOWN IS HAW SUiVEY DATA REFERENCED FROM AM>

TIED-IN TO WELL CASING NO. 10

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-59 Page:

1 of 1 Settlement of Control Building

(., DUKE ENERGY Cl)...

z:

0 z IE j... 2~--..,.-,,,...,,-----+----;- --- t---- ;-----+----;-- - - t----;--- --+----;r-------1----;----,

~

-- CONTROL BLOG POINT IC l;j.

--- -- CONTROL BLDG. POINT 2C U>

CONTROL BLDG. POINT 3C Ill...

z:

~

IE...

0

~ 2

..J

~

~

3 1970 JAN fl:8 IMR APR MAY' JlME Jt.LY AuG SEPT OCT NJY DEC

.POINT 4C

-- CONTROL ILDG.

CONTROL BLDG. POINT 5 C I

I JAN FEB MAR APR MA'I' JLWI JULY AUG SE.PT OCT NOV DEC I JAN FEB. MAR APR... JUNE JULY AUG.*..,. OC:T W/11 DEC I JAN FEB IIIAlt APR IIIAY JUNE 1971 1972 1973

- r--._

NOTE,

PERMANENT BENCH MARK FOR lHIS SURVEY IS DEEP WELL CASING NO 10 ALL DATA SHOWN IS RAW SLfl\\lEY DATA REFERENCED FROM AND TIED*IN TO WELL CASING NO. JO.

I\\

I J ~

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-60 Page:

1 of 1 Settlement of Radwaste Building and Stack

(., DUKE ENERGY 1971 1972.

1910 I

Q JAN F£8 w.A APR MAY JUN[ Jll..Y A0G S(P'T OCT NOV DEC J AN FEB MAR

z:

0

~

I-z i 2

..J I-I-

3 0

!z

~ 2

..J I-I-

Ill 3

-- RAOWASTE BLDG POINT IR

-- - -- RAOWASTE BLOG POINT 2R 1970

.J&N F£8 MAR APR MA'I JUNE..U..'I' AUG SE:PT OCT NOV DEC 1

-- STACK POINT $Pl

- --- STACK POINT SP2 STACI( POINT SP3 STACK POINT SP4 1971 1972 JAN FE 8 MAA APR MIY JUME JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR.&PA MAY JUN( JULY AUG SEPT OCT NCN QS'C T

T T

NOT~-'----

PERMANENT BENCH MARK FOR Tl<IS SURvt:Y IS DEEP WELL CASING NO IO. ALL DATA SHOWN IS RAW SURVEY DATA REFERENCED FROM ANO TIED-IN TO WELL CASING NO. 10

~

I I

I

~ ---~~.. ___..__

-~

1973 1973 J Atrll HI II.I.It APR MAY -"ltE I

I I

I

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-61 Page:

1 of 1 Settlement of Circulating Water Intake

(., DUKE ENERGY

r u

0

~ I 2

...I........,

r

~

~

3 0

~ 2

...I...

3 1910 I

1911 I

r--._J912

_\\_

i91!

AN FEB MAA APR MAY JUN[JUl.Y &.11n. Ul"f OCT NOV 0£C JAN f[B MAR APR.U.Y JUul """ a.,m r r A* OCT MO\\I DEC JAN fS:A

• • a**

A.PA MA't'.MIN[JLJl.y"'ti"IA _,._ nrT wn, I.u, fl'R MM.... uay.......,

~

I-L=

-- CIRCULATING WATER INTAKE POINT I

---

* CIRCULATING WATER INl'AKE 1 2

I I

I

' ' ! ' ' i 1970

.1&.111 ffl 11AR APR...,,,

~ -*t.*- V AUG SCPT OCT ICJY 0£C LEGEND

-- CIRCULATING WATER INTAKE POM 4

---

CIRCULATING WATER INfAKE PONT 5 I

I I

I I

I JAN Ft:* MAA APR IM.Y

.........uy..M.111 vpT nr.T..nv O£clJAN n:a MAR *--

y.,...., JULY AUG 1971

~

NCJl'E,

~MANENT BENCH MARK FOR THlS SURVEY IS C£EP WELL CASING NO 10 AU. DATA SHOWN 15 RAW SURVEY DATA REFERENCED FROM ANO TIED-IN 10 WELL CASING NO. IO.

....... __ ---i--,.,-~*

,_ POf,IT 3 DESTROYED

~

C

~

1975 JAN F_.* MAit APfl....,.y JIM(

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-62 Page:

1 of 1 Settlement of Service Water Intake

(., DUKE ENERGY 0 **

u,...

(,)

... z i

... 2

...I.........

u, LEGEND,----,-

- --+-----+- -- +--- --+- ---l----+-----+----1----+----4-----1------1

-- SERVICE WATER MAT POINT I

---

SERVICE WATER MAT POM' I

3 L--'-...J...-'--------'--'--"---'--'---'-...J...--'------'-L--'-...J...--'--------'--'-.J..--'--'---'---'---'------'--'-...J...-L.----1-L--'-...J...--'--------'--'--"---'--L.....I u,...

~

IE...

0

~ 2

...I.........

u, 3

1970

. JAN Ftl MM APR NA'I

~ -

.u Y AUG S(PT OCT lrl>V DEC

---_wg~

-- SERVICE WATER MAT POM' ~

- ---- SERVICE WATER MAT POINf ~

I JAN FEB MAR APR IMY JUHi:.U.Y AUG S[PT OCT trrtnv on-J JAN iEa IIIIAfl APR MAY....-..111,a Y AU8 _.,,,. OCT WAI n.-c I JAN n:* IIAII APtl IIAY -.....

1971 1972 NOTE :

PERMANENT BENCH MARI< FOR THIS SURVEY IS DEEP WELL CASING NO. IO. ALL DATA SHOWN IS RAW SURVEY DATA REFERENCED FRlM ANO TIED-IN TO WELL CASING NO. IO.

M*~ ~

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-63 Page:

1 of 1 Settlement of Diesel Generator Building

(., DUKE ENERGY Q JAN FE

r 0

z

~

.J..........,,

2 3

LEGEND

--DIESEL

- - -- DIESEL DIESEL 1970 GENERATOfl BLDG.

GENERATOR BLDG.

GENERATOR BLDG.

1970 OCT NOV DEC I JAN f 1972 1911 I

MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY Ai.JG SEPT OCT NOV DEC AN f B MAR APR 1973 l'OINT I POINT 2 l'OINT 3 1971 1972 1973 0

J.&N FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JU..Y AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APA MAY.Jl.ltl,AJLY AUG SEPT oc, Nov oEcl JAN FEB IIIAfl APR MAY 11 -

ULY AUfi.:.. - ~

DEC I JAN FEB MM AN MAY JUN[

r

~

z...

~ 2

.J..........,,

3

--- LEGElj

--DIESEL GENERATOfl BLDG.

---

* DIESEL GENERATOR BLDG.

I I

POINT 4 POINT 5 I

.JJ2!L_

PERMANENT BENCH MARK FOR Tl11S SURVEY IS DEEP WELL CASING NO 10. ALL DATA Sl()WN.

IS RAW SURVEY DATA REFERENCED A10M AND TIED-IN TO WELL CASING NO. 10.

"7 -

.......... t:

I I

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-64 Page:

1 of 3 Intake Canal Boring Log C15A - Sheet 1 of 3

(., DUKE ENERGY BORING NO. S}A N

79.965 E 213081220 GROUND SURFACE EL +13.60 isAMPU: j P£N£TMTION El.EV.

DEPTH DESCRIPTION uses RESISTANCE 111!:MARKS FEET FEET TYPE BLOWS Pt:R FOOT 10 zo JO 40 IO 10...

~

~~--

LOOSE FINE SAND SP 1 (l 0

I 14.0' 15 0.. '

r (21.1)

LOOSE SAND SW 19.0' 20 0 ~

(46.5)

~

VERY SOFT SANDY CLAY CL

-10

~

24.0' t~

25 0

1- (76.9) ll

~

MEDIUM STIFF SILTY CLAY -

CH SOME SHELLS

~

29.0' 30 0 ~

t (47.4)

~

SOFT SAl~DY CLAY -

SOME SAND CL LENSES

-20

~

,34.0'

- 1c; 0 i -

.. (60.0)

~

- I MEDIUM STIFF SILTY CLAY -

CH 40 0

(38. 9)

SOME SHELLS

'\\

-JO

~

~ I 45 0

._ (25.0)

MEDIUM DENSE FINE SAND SP 50

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-64 Page:

2 of 3 Intake Canal Boring Log C15A - Sheet 2 of 3

(., DUKE ENERGY BORING No.c~

N 79.965 E

213081220 GROUND SURFACE EL. +13.60 lsAMPU "

PENETRATION ELEV.

DEPTH TVPE I DESCRIPTION uses RESISTANCE REMARKS FEET FEET 8LOWS PER FOOT 10 20 JO 40 to

0 SAND AND SHELLS l'-'

CLAYEY FINE JJ~p OF

-40

~

54.0' OCK.

VERY HARD SHELL LIMESTONE -

USED BX

'i'i iCJ

s~

SOME VUGS CORI:: 1-5/8" 57.0' DIA.

~

t--

1 c; l'.O

~

- i

-so SOFT SANDY SHELL LIMESTONE 28 65 (DENSE) 69.0' 7

- 70 I

I SOFT TO MEDIL'M HARD SANDY I

I I

-60 a l SHELL LIMESTONE I

,- 75 75.0 1 I

I 1 rr-r I

I I

I l

SOFT TO HARD SA1IDY SHELL I

5 An

't LIMESTONE -

SOME VtlGS I

I

-70

- 12 l 84.0' A<;

'1' t--

i..

l I

30 NO RECOVERY Q(\\

v

~

I WASH SAMPLE HARD CONCLOMERATIC SHELL CONTAINS BROKEN LL"tESTONE (LIMESTONE AGGREGATE, SHELLS

-An 0 ~

Qt; VUGS) t--

... 1 (\\(\\

63..i.

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-64 Page:

3 of 3 Intake Canal Boring Log C15A - Sheet 3 of 3

(., DUKE ENERGY ELEV. I 0£1>Ti; iSA¥PU:I ~

FEET I FEE, T"IPE '! ~

-100 i

ii:

=

...,in_=

~~..

115 30 I

I i o l SORl"IG NO.C~

N 79,965 E

2,Jos,220 GROIJNO SURFACE EL. +13.60 DESCRIPTION HARD CONGLOMERAIIC SHE~L LIMESTONE AND SHELL LIMESTONE (OENSE WITH VUGS) uses 1...,1... 3,.....,._o'-+----t VERY SOFT DRILLING

o RECOVERY PENETRATION RESISTANCE BLOWS Pl!R FOOT 10 20 JO.., I 120 r

i 120.8'

---

"'1

• i-.--i----~~-::-=-==---r-~

I I

r

-110

.... 125 1 p MEDIUM HARD TO HARD SHELL (3. oi h LL'!ESTONE (MEDIUM DENSE To I

37_ }t:::J:::'

VERY POROUS -

VUGS) 124.0' I

= ( 2. 6 !

SOFT TO MEDIUM HARD *SANDY i

22,I...

SHELL LIMESTONE (POROUS 1)0 = (l.J~

10... b

-120 t t

WITH Vt/GS )

134,U' 1)5 !

y I

~

7

-j (0.8)

-u..s.4[139.oi 14... *

• I i

I i ---

j

-l SOFT TO 11£DIUh HARD SAND":{ SllELl

--- ------------t---1 BOTTOM *oF BORING 139.0' I

i I

i I

I '

I !

j I

I !

I I REMARKS TOP OF CASTLE HAYNE P-IEZOHETER INSTALLED

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-65 Page:

1 of 3 Discharge Canal Boring Log C42A - Sheet 1 of 3 BORING NO.W>

N 751810 E 21297,965 GROUND SURFACE EL. +J.§.12g PENETMTION ELEV.

DEPTH isAMP\\£ *!

DESCRIPTION uses RESISTANCE MIIHIIKS FEET FEET TYPE ILOWS 111:11 FOOT 10 "' JO 40 10 LO()SF'. FTtJr c AtJn 1 ~'

CD 0

~

-(15.2) f."

LOOSE TO MEDIUM DENSE CLAYEY

.. )-

5 0

MEDIUM FINE S}ND - TP.ACE OF SP

-(17.5)

SILT 7.0 I 10 LOOSE CLAYEY SAND SC 0

~*

10 0

- (28. 9)

-~.

I VERY LOOSE TO LOOSE SILTY 15 0

-(33.f,)

SM.

It SAND 0

• )

10 n

• 20 l!l"'/ ~

/

l SOFT SILTY CLAY t\\ND SftND

) '

LENSES CL

'.i~t 71,. n*

25 0

'!fl

'-(6-. 3) l~ MEDIUM STIFF SILTY CLAY, S>ND I

I-I-

~~

AND SHELL LENSES CL

-10

/ ' {

?o o*

30 0 ~

-(123.8) t

~

MEDIUM STIFF TO STIFF SILTY 1~

0 r~

'-(84.4)

I'-,_

I r~

CLAY CL

-20 j

,J, 10 n *

"" 40 0

{'

-(90. 0)

<~

STIFF SILTY CLAY WITH SILT

"\\',.

LENSES (6" SP.&CING)

CL

~

I.I. n*

45 0 l'f

'-(94.5)

'I 0

L~

MEDIUM STIFF TO STIFF SILTY I

-(88.3) -

CLAY CI.

- so -

1'r

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-65 Page:

2 of 3 Discharge Canal Boring Log C42A - Sheet 2 of 3

(., DUKE ENERGY ELEV.

DEPTH !SAMPLE FEET FEET TYPE 5~

0

~

~

-l.O 60

..)

~

i

.,_ 65 - lilO<!>

I I

-~o

.... 70 -lI.oo.A V

t-,

--~

7C:.

_-..bQ_ --

RO -

Qi.A

- 85

-ll..0.0.L:,_

V

-70

-1.l.illl.L".

on V

- ILao...:::::...

- 40A

~

V

,,,n 76

'!I I

\\: -~ ff

\\

-~,..

I

~

rS g

~~

-~

~

~-

• r 1.,.....

~

. I *

!~

o~

...5 9-:

~

~:

..,._1

~

r-,--

~

~

BORING NO.CJiZ.'i N

75, 1:110 E 2,297,%5 GROUND SURFACE EL ;tJa.ac PNETRATION DESCRIPTION uses IIESISTMIC(

REMARKS ILOWS Pf:R FOOT 10 zo IO

~ IO

\\

-~47.3)

MEDIUM STIFF SILTY CLAY -

SOME FINE SANO 54.O'

\\

LOOSE MEDIUM FT!-IE SANO - TRACE

~ :'-,

t-(36.11)

OF SILT ANO SHt:LLS r---..,

TOP OF PC'Cl<

VERY OEl':JSE FINE,,nm 59 Q'

~

SOFT TO MEDIUM HARD.MEDIUM.

~~

DENSE SHELL LIMESTONE 62.6'

\\.l.J.UJ HARO MASSIVE TO SLIGHTLY STARTED NX C'ORING BROKEN DENSE SHELL LI?-'ESTONE (2-1/8" DIA..

(VUGGIE) 67.6' CORE)

MEDIUM HARO SLIGHTLY SPOKEN SHELL LI?-'ESTONE - VE!IY POROUS 70 F,'

SOFT TO MF.OIL'~ HA.RO BROKEN SHELL LIMESTONE (VUGGIE)

75. 8 I HARO MASSIVE SHF.LL Lil'ESTONE -

OENSF.

78.J' SOFT TO MEDIUM H.ARO B!!OKEN TO SLIGHTLY BROKEN SHELL LI~STONE

- POROUS RC:. 0 1

HARO BROKEN TO SLIGHTLY B!IOKEN CONGLOMERATIC SHELL Lil'ESTONE (VUGGIE) 88 2' SOFT BROKEN SHELL LIMESTONE -

POROUS, FRIABLE 93.7' VERY BROKEN TO BROKEN CONGLOMERATIC MEDIUM. H~RO TO SHF.LL LIMESTONE v

UPDATED FSAR SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 2 FIGURES Revision:

24 Figure:

2-65 Page:

3 of 3 Intake Canal Boring Log C42A - Sheet 3 of 3

(-, DUKE ENERGY LEV.

DEPTH SAMPl£ FEET FEET TYPE

~

~

76 /:'

~

,... 105 -

-90 8

-- 2-<;

... l!O -

- (3.0)

~~~

,... 115-

- (0.8)

-ll.0.0....:..'._

- 100

... 120 -

- (0.4)

-..90..

125

- (0.6)

-,,.l.0.9...8.... 127. f 0

1 II I

~

11~

r=*

T....

r'.

...;:J

t l

Cl

9.

I; IF""*

~

h*

I-"-

.. It ~

~;-

BORING NO.W'"'

N z~.~*g E, ~22 2ll~

GROUND SURFACE EL. -t=J s ca PENETRATION DESCRIPTION uses RESISTANCE IIOIAIIKS ILOWS. PER,ooT 10 20 JO 40 IO

<:AMF A'<:

ADnu.-

1n1 1 I lfARD SLIGHTLY SPOKEN TO MASSIVE CONCLOl'!F.RA TT C SHELL L Il-'ESTONE 1n~ n*

SOFT TO MEDIU?' HARD SHELL TOP OF Lil-'EsrcNE - SLIGHTLY PORovx 1 11,

CASTLE H>YNF.

MEDIUM HARD SPOKEN SHELL L TM.-o:;TnN~* -

11n n*

MEDIUM HARD VEPY BPOKEN SHELL LIMESTONE - POPOUS 113.6' SOFT TO MEDIL'1'i HARD M>SSIVE TO BROKEN MEDIL~! DENSE SHELL LIMESTONE - SLIGHTLY POROUS 118.3' MEDIUM HARD SLIGHTLY BROKEN t!EDIW. DENSE SHELL LI1"ESTON!l20.~'

SOFT TO 1-'EDitn' HARD SLIGHTLY BROKEN SANDY TEXTL~ED SHELL LIMESTONE - POROUS, FRI>BLE PIEZOHETER INS:rALLED AT BOTTOM. OF BORING COMPLETION 127.8 '

OF BOIUNG I

BORING COMPLETED 1*29-70