ML20003F302

Responds to Analysis & Comment on Redirection of NRC Document Control Sys, & 810408 Memo.Rept Does Not Justify Change in Executive Director for Operations Decision.In Response to Memo,Opinion Not Incorporated in Tracking Sys

ML20003F302
Person / Time
Issue date:	04/16/1981
From:	Cornell E NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To:	Steele M NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
Shared Package
ML19284C410	List: ML19284C409 ML20003F302 ML20003F306 ML20003F308 ML20003F309 ML20003F310 ML20003F311 ML20003F313 ML20003F317 ML20003F321 ML20003F326 ML20003F327 ML20003F329 ML20003F333 ML20003F336 ML20003F339 ML20003F342 ML20003F344 ML20003F345 ML20003F349 ML20148M400
References
NUDOCS 8104200554
Download: ML20003F302 (2)

Text

! [ [f PDR 9,

g fp e.

UNITED STATES 3 g 41 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

s., v....+/

\\

APR 161981 MEMORANDUM FOR: Myrna L. Steele, Deputy Director D.ivision of Technical Infccmation and Document Control, ADM FROM:

E. Kevin Cornell

- l,:'

Deputy Executive Director for Operations

SUBJECT:

DIFFERING PROFESSIONAL 6 PINION ON DECISI TO REDIRECT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL SYSTEM^ -

As responsible program manager opinion and reviewed your repor,t, " Analysis and Coment o the NRC Document Control System."

the Document Control System (DCS), changing the Execu c on of

.. J u

i The "DCS Actions" containediin the ED0's November 18 as you point out

, 1980 memorandum, and evidence pres,ented in the Program Evaluation of System prepared by the Office of Management and Program Anal ontrol However, the DCS actions were based not only on the MPA pro ysis (MPA).

but on several other factors as well.

gram evaluation benefits provided by the DCS were considered.tions, th i

, and our judgments on the

}

i Additionally, the DCS Policy Advisory Group, composed of De k

Directors, reviews all DCS actions and thus serves as a che k t puty Office that decisions abodt the DCS do not have an adverse eff c

o make sure responsibilities to assure public health and safety.

on NRC's and Auditor's DCS report.about the DCS were also reinforced by t nspector j

We expect to keep the Comission fuliy informed of the stat I.

decision.

differing professional opinion so your report is available us of the DCS consideration.

at least two Comissioners and discuss your concern ab or Comission Control System.

ment In sumary, as the responsible official for assessing your diff differing professional opinion fails to justify any ch ering ur n recent i

i oo4200 M

~

C

Myrna L. Steele

• decisions about the Document Control System. A copy of your differing professional opinion and this memorandum will be placed in the Public Document Room.

In response to the additional questions asked in your April 8, 1981 memorandum, your opinion has not been incorporated into the EDO tracking system.

Also, I have not received other differing profess.ional opinions that are relevant to yours.

' 7,, -

g 7;_

.)

E. Kevin Cornell I

Deputy Executive Director

_ ~

for Operations

~

m M

e eh 86