ML20023D079: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20023D079
| number = ML20023D079
| issue date = 01/03/1983
| issue date = 01/03/1983
| title = Responds to 821228 Ltr Requesting Supplemental Info to 821126 Ltr Requesting Approval for Bechtel to Conduct Independent Review of Plant Mgt.Assessment Program Includes Issues Covered in 821112 Order to Show Cause
| title = Responds to Requesting Supplemental Info to Requesting Approval for Bechtel to Conduct Independent Review of Plant Mgt.Assessment Program Includes Issues Covered in 821112 Order to Show Cause
| author name = Dickhoner W
| author name = Dickhoner W
| author affiliation = CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
| author affiliation = CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = NUDOCS 8305190190
| document report number = NUDOCS 8305190190
| title reference date = 12-28-1982
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 67
| page count = 67
Line 16: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:,.         ,
{{#Wiki_filter:,.
Q L     t3D-55'6                                                       a         p       ,
Q L
1'.
t3D-55'6 a
f THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY                           sK CINCINN AT1. OHIO 45201 W. H. DICKHON ER January 3, 1983 PRINCIPAL STAFF A     hj U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                       D/RA I       isc [
p 1'.
Region III                                               W1           jgnf' .;;
f THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY sK CINCINN AT1. OHIO 45201 W. H. DICKHON ER January 3, 1983 PRINCIPAL STAFF hj A
799 Roosevelt Road                                       Ofs,PQ       MAO ()
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission D/RA I isc [
Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137                               25L'El       !RO i OEciP f     J       j Attention:         Mr. James G. Keppler                   '4 L OL i     l     J Regional Administrator                               l FILE l Gentlemen:
Region III W1 jgnf'.;;
Re:     Wm. H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 Order to Shaw Cause and Order Immediately Suspending Construction, Docket No. 50-358, Construction Permit No. CPPR-88, W.O. 57300, Job E-5590 - Supplemental Information Requested By Your Letter of December 28, 1982 This is in response to your letter of December 28, 1982 requesting supplemental information to my letter of November 26, 1982, in which we requested the approval of the Bechtel Power Corporation (Bechtel) to conduct the independent review of the management of the Zimmer Project. We would like to provide the requested information in the same general order and format, as follows:
799 Roosevelt Road Ofs,PQ MAO
l         A.l.             The only document we have related to our plans to utilize
()
!                          Bechtel as outlined in my letter of November 10, 1982 to l                         the NRC Commissioners, is a proposal submitted by Bechtel with a transmittal letter dated November 8, 1982. A copy of this original submittal, less contract terms and conditions which we and Bechtel deem proprietary, as well as a copy of the transmittal letter is enclosed. You will note that the original proposal is essentially the one submitted with my letter to you dated November 26,
Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 25L'El
                                                                                                  ^
!RO i OEciP f J
1982. Also enclosed is a tabulation of the meetings held l                         between CG&E and Bechtel as well as a tabulation of the site visits by Bechtel employees to date.
j Attention:
Your request under this particular item also included some discussion of any oral understandings that we might have relative to utilizing Bechtel as outlined in my. November 10, l                         1982 letter to the Commissioners. As I indicated in my letter of November 26, 1982 to you, we had concluded prior l
Mr. James G. Keppler
i to the issuance of the Show cause Order that additional
'4 L i
!                          project management expertise should be brought to the 8305190190 830103                                                                       -
l J
1983 g,, tgfj,7g{,Splab - JA N 4 i   PDR ADOCK 05000358   PDR A
Regional Administrator OL l FILE l Gentlemen:
b
Re:
Wm. H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 Order to Shaw Cause and Order Immediately Suspending Construction, Docket No. 50-358, Construction Permit No. CPPR-88, W.O.
: 57300, Job E-5590 - Supplemental Information Requested By Your Letter of December 28, 1982 This is in response to your letter of December 28, 1982 requesting supplemental information to my letter of November 26, 1982, in which we requested the approval of the Bechtel Power Corporation (Bechtel) to conduct the independent review of the management of the Zimmer Project.
We would like to provide the requested information in the same general order and format, as follows:
l A.l.
The only document we have related to our plans to utilize Bechtel as outlined in my letter of November 10, 1982 to l
the NRC Commissioners, is a proposal submitted by Bechtel with a transmittal {{letter dated|date=November 8, 1982|text=letter dated November 8, 1982}}.
A copy of this original submittal, less contract terms and conditions which we and Bechtel deem proprietary, as well as a copy of the transmittal letter is enclosed.
You will note that the original proposal is essentially the one submitted with my letter to you dated November 26,
^
1982.
Also enclosed is a tabulation of the meetings held l
between CG&E and Bechtel as well as a tabulation of the site visits by Bechtel employees to date.
Your request under this particular item also included some discussion of any oral understandings that we might have relative to utilizing Bechtel as outlined in my. November 10, l
1982 letter to the Commissioners.
As I indicated in my l
letter of November 26, 1982 to you, we had concluded prior to the issuance of the Show cause Order that additional i
project management expertise should be brought to the 8305190190 830103 g,,
tgfj,7g{,Splab - JA N 4 1983 i
PDR ADOCK 05000358 A
PDR b


e                                                                                 -
e f
f
_U. S. Nuclear Regulatory' Commission Attns LMr. James.G. Keppler
_U. S. Nuclear Regulatory' Commission Attns LMr. James.G. Keppler
            ~Page~2 January 3,.1983 Zimmer-Project. -On November 2, 1982 we contacted, by telephone,.threeofirms, one-being Bechtel, relative to making a presentation as to their-capabilities to conduct an assessment- of the Zimmer Project management.-
~Page~2 January 3,.1983 Zimmer-Project. -On November 2, 1982 we contacted, by telephone,.threeofirms, one-being Bechtel, relative to making a presentation as to their-capabilities to conduct an assessment-of the Zimmer Project management.-
                        'A fourth company was considered but not contacted since they had just recently done work for us. Bechtel made an' initial presentation to us on November 5, 1982 and
'A fourth company was considered but not contacted since they had just recently done work for us.
                        . submitted a formal proposal to us outlining a proposed program on November 8, 1982. As indicated above, .a copy of this-initial proposal is enclosed. This proposal was subsequently revised by letter dated November 23, 1982-
Bechtel made an' initial presentation to us on November 5, 1982 and
                                                                  ~
. submitted a formal proposal to us outlining a proposed program on November 8, 1982.
        ^
As indicated above,.a copy of this-initial proposal is enclosed.
which.was attached to my letter to you dated November 26, i                       1982.
This proposal was subsequently revised by {{letter dated|date=November 23, 1982|text=letter dated November 23, 1982}}-which.was attached to my letter to you dated November 26,
l                       By November 10, 1982, we had concluded that Bechtel was
~
;-                      the most: qualified of the companies interviewed to fulfill our needs. We indicated verbally to Bechtel that we were going to submit a letter to the Commission indicating a
^
:                      proposed program utilizing their services.
i 1982.
4
l By November 10, 1982, we had concluded that Bechtel was the most: qualified of the companies interviewed to fulfill our needs.
.                        In the interim, the Commission issued the Show cause Order on November 12, 1982,' shutting down safety-related con-struction 'at : the site.. Since the assessment portion of the program outlined in my November 10, 1982 letter to the
We indicated verbally to Bechtel that we were going to submit a letter to the Commission indicating a proposed program utilizing their services.
;                        Commission was essentially the same independent review of
4 In the interim, the Commission issued the Show cause Order on November 12, 1982,' shutting down safety-related con-struction 'at : the site.. Since the assessment portion of the program outlined in my {{letter dated|date=November 10, 1982|text=November 10, 1982 letter}} to the Commission was essentially the same independent review of l
                                      ~
management requirement outlined in the Show Cause Order,
l                        management requirement outlined in the Show Cause Order,
~
:                        the decision was made to allow Bechtel to proceed with
the decision was made to allow Bechtel to proceed with
                        -preliminary; work. It was indicated by us to Bechtel that
-preliminary; work.
.                        they would now be proceeding on the basis that approval
It was indicated by us to Bechtel that they would now be proceeding on the basis that approval l
'                        from the NRC'would have'to be forthcoming before any definitive contract was signed and a total scope of work
from the NRC'would have'to be forthcoming before any definitive contract was signed and a total scope of work
                        ' defined.
' defined.
l This situation was discussed with you at our meeting on j                       November 17, 1982. At that time it was understood that l
l This situation was discussed with you at our meeting on j
November 17, 1982.
At that time it was understood that l
any work done by Bechtel prior to NRC approval was being
any work done by Bechtel prior to NRC approval was being
                        .done at risk.
.done at risk.
It should be emphasized that there is no signed agreement     (
It should be emphasized that there is no signed agreement
nor formal purchase ordar issued to the Bechtel Power Corporation for.their efforts to date. Our verbal.under-l:
(
1                       standing with then 'is that if they receive approval to do
nor formal purchase ordar issued to the Bechtel Power l:
(;                       the management assessment from the NRC, a formal agreement
Corporation for.their efforts to date.
(.                       will be signed covering those services and commercial terms
Our verbal.under-1 standing with then 'is that if they receive approval to do
;                        negotiated for any additional scope of work beyond the i                       initial assessment phase. In the event that for some i                       unknown reason Bechtel would be disapproved,' we have L                      verbally. agreed that at that point in time Bechtel would be reinbursed for work completed on the basis of their standard consulting rates for comparable services, i
(;
the management assessment from the NRC, a formal agreement
(.
will be signed covering those services and commercial terms negotiated for any additional scope of work beyond the i
initial assessment phase.
In the event that for some i
unknown reason Bechtel would be disapproved,' we have verbally. agreed that at that point in time Bechtel would be L
reinbursed for work completed on the basis of their standard consulting rates for comparable services, i
I b
I b


r er re      U.iS. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
r er e
              ' Attn:   Mr. James.G. Keppler                                             ,
U.iS. Nuclear Regulatory Commission r
Page 3 January?3, 1983 We believe that this should clarify our: relationship with Bechtel and should indicate that any work done by Bechtel to date has'not in any way compromised the NRC's approval-process.
' Attn:
B.l.-             Refer to the attached letter dated December 29, 1982
Mr. James.G. Keppler Page 3 January?3, 1983 We believe that this should clarify our: relationship with Bechtel and should indicate that any work done by Bechtel to date has'not in any way compromised the NRC's approval-process.
                                  .from Bechtel for their response to this item.
B.l.-
Refer to the attached {{letter dated|date=December 29, 1982|text=letter dated December 29, 1982}}
.from Bechtel for their response to this item.
Note:- For clarification, refer to Appendix'A of Bechtel's proposal for Paragraphs E and C.1 which they have now revised.
Note:- For clarification, refer to Appendix'A of Bechtel's proposal for Paragraphs E and C.1 which they have now revised.
C.l.               CG&E's Response to Item C.1:
C.l.
In this question you asked why any Bechtel continuing-role on the project beyond IV B (1) (a) of the Order would not affect their objectivity in performing the management assessment. We would first like to indicate that the objective of the progrmn proposed in my letter
CG&E's Response to Item C.1:
                                  ,of November-10, 1982 and the steps outlined in the Commission's Show Cause Order of November 12, 1982, are essentially-the same; namely,'to complete the Zimmer Project in full compliance with all. applicable requirements to ensure a safe operating plant. The cornerstone of my
In this question you asked why any Bechtel continuing-role on the project beyond IV B (1) (a) of the Order would not affect their objectivity in performing the management assessment.
.                                  N'ovember 10 letter and the Show Cause Order is to bring sufficient management, quality assurance, and construction
We would first like to indicate that the objective of the progrmn proposed in my letter
                                                                    ~
,of November-10, 1982 and the steps outlined in the Commission's Show Cause Order of November 12, 1982, are essentially-the same; namely,'to complete the Zimmer Project in full compliance with all. applicable requirements to ensure a safe operating plant.
!                                  expertise to'the project to implement the Quality Confirma-tion Program and the= project' completion. program. The first
The cornerstone of my N'ovember 10 letter and the Show Cause Order is to bring sufficient management, quality assurance, and construction expertise to'the project to implement the Quality Confirma-
?                                 step in both programs was to determine what must be done to
~
: j.                                 the management of dhe project to ensure ~that the project i                                 can-be completed'in conformance with applicable regulations
tion Program and the= project' completion. program.
,-                                and the Construction Permit.
The first
?
step in both programs was to determine what must be done to j.
the management of dhe project to ensure ~that the project i
can-be completed'in conformance with applicable regulations and the Construction Permit.
{-
{-
As indicated in my letter of November 26, 1982, CG&E believes that Bechtel has expertise in all required areas and firmly believes that Bechtel has the professional integrity and character'to recommend a management structure that would be the best possible one to meet the unique         .
As indicated in my letter of November 26, 1982, CG&E believes that Bechtel has expertise in all required areas and firmly believes that Bechtel has the professional integrity and character'to recommend a management structure that would be the best possible one to meet the unique requirements of the Zimmer Project, regardless of the l
l requirements of the Zimmer Project, regardless of the
organization
,                                  organization
* utilized for its implementation. 'We further l
* utilized for its implementation. 'We further l   .                            believe. that Bechtel is the best qualified through its experience and depth of personnel to be the implementing organization, independent of any assignment to assess project management.
believe. that Bechtel is the best qualified through its experience and depth of personnel to be the implementing organization, independent of any assignment to assess project management.
L l
L l
__ _      ..m.       , ._. _ _            _ _ _ _ . _ _ - . _ .-_ _ _ _ ._ _ ._.. _ _
..m.


o:     'U; S.? Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Mr. James G. Keppler Page:4-January 3, 1983 Our-objective is to complete.this plant in such a manner that>it meets all applicable requirements. With this in' mind, we believe the best course of. action is 'to have the party: implementing a-program be'thelsame party pro-posing the courses of . action to be taken.                                         Undivided
o:
                          . responsibility would be placed on one party,- focusing accountability, thereby best ensuring the integrity of.
'U; S.? Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:
the completed plant.- This would have the best chance of
Mr. James G. Keppler Page:4-January 3, 1983 Our-objective is to complete.this plant in such a manner that>it meets all applicable requirements.
. '                        success by not placing.a second entity in the role of i                           trying to implement a program that they had no responsi-bility for formulating.
With this in' mind, we believe the best course of. action is 'to have the party: implementing a-program be'thelsame party pro-posing the courses of. action to be taken.
l To summarize, we believe that Bechtel has . superior quali-
Undivided
;                          -fications in all theerequired areas' involved in completing
. responsibility would be placed on one party,- focusing accountability, thereby best ensuring the integrity of.
}                           Eimmer. We believe that their professional integrity, as well as their vested interest in the nuclear industry, would not allow them to compromise a management assessment of what they might perceive their downstream role.on the 1
the completed plant.- This would have the best chance of success by not placing.a second entity in the role of i
project to be. Finally, it is the logical decision to have the same party accept-the responsibility of implement-ing. a program they created, particularly when they have the total expertise of the Bechtel Power Corpacation.
trying to implement a program that they had no responsi-bility for formulating.
1 1                         You'also requested a discussion as to whether Bechtel's activities at the site to date affected their objectivity 4
l To summarize, we believe that Bechtel has. superior quali-
in making the management assessment. As indicated in several places,.Bechtel's assignment relative to my-letter 4                          of November 10,-1982'and the Show cause order is the same relative to the management assessment. Bechtel has not been-. compromised in any respect in their activities to date nor have they been given any-preconceived ideas or direction. They have been directed by myself to make a 4                        ' management assessment of the project with no reservations and to mnke an honest, unbias ed, and comprehensive report
-fications in all theerequired areas' involved in completing
.,                        based. on the L facts :as they > exist.
}
                                ~
Eimmer.
I want1the facts-as much as the NRC 1 and I can state categorically that CG&E has taken no actions that would affect the independence relative to Bechtel's activities to date that should have any affect on Bechtel's objectivity. Furthermore, at no time has anyone from CG&E discussed with any member of the Bechtel organi-zation any of their findings'or made any attempt to c                           influence such findings.
We believe that their professional integrity, as well as their vested interest in the nuclear industry, would not allow them to compromise a management assessment of what they might perceive their downstream role.on the project to be.
k-             'C.l.     Refer to the attached letter dated December 29, 1982 from Bechtel for their response to this item.
Finally, it is the logical decision to 1
have the same party accept-the responsibility of implement-ing. a program they created, particularly when they have the total expertise of the Bechtel Power Corpacation.
1 1
You'also requested a discussion as to whether Bechtel's activities at the site to date affected their objectivity in making the management assessment.
As indicated in 4
several places,.Bechtel's assignment relative to my-letter of November 10,-1982'and the Show cause order is the same 4
relative to the management assessment.
Bechtel has not been-. compromised in any respect in their activities to date nor have they been given any-preconceived ideas or direction.
They have been directed by myself to make a
' management assessment of the project with no reservations 4
and to mnke an honest, unbias ed, and comprehensive report based. on the L facts :as they > exist.
I want1the facts-as much as the NRC and I can state categorically that CG&E has taken
~
1 no actions that would affect the independence relative to Bechtel's activities to date that should have any affect on Bechtel's objectivity.
Furthermore, at no time has anyone from CG&E discussed with any member of the Bechtel organi-zation any of their findings'or made any attempt to c
influence such findings.
k-
'C.l.
Refer to the attached {{letter dated|date=December 29, 1982|text=letter dated December 29, 1982}} from Bechtel for their response to this item.
1 J
1 J
f
f


P e
P e
  ;o       .U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Mr. James G. Keppler Page 5 January 3, 1983 I believe'the above has satisfactorily answered your supplemental request and should allow the NRC 'to formally approve Bechtel. to conduct an. independent management assessment of the Zimmer Project. Whether Bechtel was selected'just prior.to the Show Cause Order or immediately following-the Order does not place the test of independence in jeopardy as defined in Chairman Palladino's letter.to Congressmen Dingell and Ottinger.
; o
Yours very truly, THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY By W. H. Dickhoner
.U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:
          .WHD:vm Enclosures Bechtel-proposal dated November 8, 1982 List of CG&E - Bechtel Off-Site Meetings List of Site Visits by Bechtel Personnel Bechtel's Response to Questions B and C dated December 29, 1982 k
Mr. James G. Keppler Page 5 January 3, 1983 I believe'the above has satisfactorily answered your supplemental request and should allow the NRC 'to formally approve Bechtel. to conduct an. independent management assessment of the Zimmer Project.
Whether Bechtel was selected'just prior.to the Show Cause Order or immediately following-the Order does not place the test of independence in jeopardy as defined in Chairman Palladino's letter.to Congressmen Dingell and Ottinger.
Yours very truly, THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY By W.
H. Dickhoner
.WHD:vm Enclosures Bechtel-proposal dated November 8, 1982 List of CG&E - Bechtel Off-Site Meetings List of Site Visits by Bechtel Personnel Bechtel's Response to Questions B and C dated December 29, 1982 k


Bechtel Power Corporation Engineers - Constructors j*   .
Bechtel Power Corporation Engineers - Constructors j*
Fifty Bea!e Street s
Fifty Bea!e Street s
San Francisco, California Mad Address: P. O.Los 3965. San Francisco.CA 909 l
San Francisco, California Mad Address:
1 November 8, 1982
P. O.Los 3965. San Francisco.CA 909 l
    +
November 8, 1982 1
+
Mr. W.H. Dickhoner, President Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company 139 East Fourth Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
Mr. W.H. Dickhoner, President Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company 139 East Fourth Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
,1          
,1


==Dear Mr. Dickhoner:==
==Dear Mr. Dickhoner:==
.}
.}
I       We appreciated the opportunity, the frankness, and the cooperation of yo.c personnel in discussing the status of your project last Friday. We agree that
I We appreciated the opportunity, the frankness, and the cooperation of yo.c personnel in discussing the status of your project last Friday.
    #      .this is a critical time in the schedule for the completion of the W.d. Zimmer plant. The completion of your project is vital to your company as well as the
We agree that
    !      future of the U.S. nuclear utility industry.             Bechtel is prepared to mobilire our full capability and experience to help Cincinnati Gas and Electric
.this is a critical time in the schedule for the completion of the W.d.
    '      complete the project.
Zimmer plant.
We believe that our management experience at Fermi, WPPSS, South Texas , and
The completion of your project is vital to your company as well as the future of the U.S.
      <    Diablo Canyon can provide you with the assistance your project organization needs   to   r'e solve the   current   problem areas           and     complete         the     Quality j     Confirmation Program.
nuclear utility industry.
    '        Appendix A       describes   the   immediate   steps       we     would     take       to     identify organizational, procedural, and actions that are needed. This Phase I of tha
Bechtel is prepared to mobilire our full capability and experience to help Cincinnati Gas and Electric complete the project.
  ;        initial work is expected to take three weeks, in which time our senior people would further design the approach and a s';af fing plan for the completion of J                            Generally, those same people, upon completion of this phase,
We believe that our management experience at Fermi, WPPSS, South Texas, and Diablo Canyon can provide you with the assistance your project organization needs to r'e solve the current problem areas and complete the Quality j
  ,i        the project.
Confirmation Program.
would be available to carry out the implementation of the plan.
Appendix A describes the immediate steps we would take to identify organizational, procedural, and actions that are needed.
Appendix B includes the resumes of the Phase I team members. You'll find them y        very experienced in nuclear power plant, and particularly BWR, p ro jec ts . In selecting these candidates, we have emphasized the need for experience in:
This Phase I of tha initial work is expected to take three weeks, in which time our senior people J
: 1.     Project managei:ient and condtruction management f       2.     Integrated project control
would further design the approach and a s';af fing plan for the completion of
  .j       3.     QA/QC programs
,i the project.
: 4.     Construction completion, systems turnover, and startup g         Ap pendix C includes summaries of Bechtel's nuclear ex pe rie nc e , whi c h , as you know, is approached by no other company, e
Generally, those same people, upon completion of this phase, would be available to carry out the implementation of the plan.
2 u
Appendix B includes the resumes of the Phase I team members. You'll find them very experienced in nuclear power plant, and particularly BWR, p ro jec ts.
In y
selecting these candidates, we have emphasized the need for experience in:
1.
Project managei:ient and condtruction management f
2.
Integrated project control
.j 3.
QA/QC programs 4.
Construction completion, systems turnover, and startup g
Ap pendix C includes summaries of Bechtel's nuclear ex pe rie nc e, whi c h, as you know, is approached by no other company, e
2u


1 1                 Mr. W.H. Dickhoner, Pr:sident
1 1
      .f                 November 8, 1982
Mr. W.H. Dickhoner, Pr:sident
  <l Pegn 2                                             Bechtel Power Corporation r
.f November 8, 1982
YO
<l Pegn 2 Bechtel Power Corporation r
                "'      Some of Bechtel's in-depth capabilities that we think are important to this       M job are:
YO Some of Bechtel's in-depth capabilities that we think are important to this M
          $              1.     Construction management and direct-hire construction i
job are:
k           2.     Quality control programs 4
1.
: 3.     Project cont rol systems for integration of quality, schedule and cost priorities 4       Reactor containment expertise
Construction management and direct-hire construction i
      ;                  5.     Uciding expertise and national code relationships e
k 2.
/                       6.     Nuclear regulatory licensing expertise 1
Quality control programs 4
y                      7. Labor relations
3.
: 8. Operating power plant services In Appendix D,     for your convenience we have included copies of two cont rac t 1                   forms.
Project cont rol systems for integration of quality, schedule and cost priorities 4
I                      The first is a technical services agreement which is our normal cont rac t for studies similar to the Phase I effort. The second is the form we normally     use   for     more broad-based support of nuclear plant projec t
Reactor containment expertise 5.
(             g~
Uciding expertise and national code relationships e
completions. This Phase II contract allows assignment of the activities that     ij
/
              \
6.
Nuclear regulatory licensing expertise 1y 7.
Labor relations 8.
Operating power plant services In Appendix D, for your convenience we have included copies of two cont rac t 1
forms.
The first is a technical services agreement which is our normal I
cont rac t for studies similar to the Phase I effort.
The second is the form we normally use for more broad-based support of nuclear plant projec t
(
completions.
This Phase II contract allows assignment of the activities that ij g~
we can foresee for successful completion of the project and allows Cincinnati
we can foresee for successful completion of the project and allows Cincinnati
                    ,  Gas and Electric, at their discretion to utilize any of Bechtel's capabilities tha ; may be required.
\\
Gas and Electric, at their discretion to utilize any of Bechtel's capabilities tha ; may be required.
L In the event that additional support services are needed after project completion, commercial terms are included that allow Cincinnati Gas and
L In the event that additional support services are needed after project completion, commercial terms are included that allow Cincinnati Gas and
]j                     Electric to use our Opera ting Plant Services organization after commercial operation for whatever help may be needed.                          .
]j Electric to use our Opera ting Plant Services organization after commercial operation for whatever help may be needed.
.J I have found it useful to personally intensively review our pe rfo rmance and c
.J I have found it useful to personally intensively review our pe rfo rmance and c
d ove rall projec t progres s in periodic executive review meetings with your counterparts in other utilities.         I recommend a similar program on the Zicmer j                   p roj ec t.
ove rall projec t progres s in periodic executive review meetings with your d
Bechtel is prepered to provide expertise and resources to assist Cincinnati Cas and Electric in the successful completion of the W.H. Zimmer Nuclear
counterparts in other utilities.
,                      Station project.     We'ao have sufficient experienced personnel to accomplish it n                    in conjunction with the project's existing capable personnel. We look forward
I recommend a similar program on the Zicmer j
?                     to working with you towards that end.
p roj ec t.
Bechtel is prepered to provide expertise and resources to assist Cincinnati Cas and Electric in the successful completion of the W.H.
Zimmer Nuclear Station project.
We'ao have sufficient experienced personnel to accomplish it in conjunction with the project's existing capable personnel.
We look forward n
?
to working with you towards that end.
Sincerely, I
Sincerely, I
H.O. Reinsch                               +
H.O. Reinsch
+
President
President
    ,        ( l   HOR /lsw                                                                             h~
( l HOR /lsw h~
t-
t-Enclosures cc:
  ;                  Enclosures cc:   E.A. Borgmann
E.A. Borgmann
.4
.4


A             s&4 Y             f0
A s&4 f0 Y s/h'y
                                        +
~
s/h'y
+
: i. e
: i. e
                                                              ~
./
                                                                  ./
's 4*
                            /      /!9/       's 4*
r
/!9/
o$
o$
r
/f.<A/7,9,t,/. / [ /,N
                      /f.<A/7,9,t,/./ / [ / ,N fesi/
/
e 4 @, ,                               / /
si/
                                                    /o/,/
/
8
4 @,,
\                 " "'          r
fe
                '~s$' "~~   sYf                          8
/ /
          ,                            "' O b*.4+''4
e 8
      / 4,
/o/,/
              ,p;('
\\
        /e.' .,
'~s$' "~~
2    /~ j,,t'/ ,,t:s"'/
sY "' O b*.4+''4 r
f ~f,$~ ! ,   -
.,p;(' j,,t'/,,t:s"'/
o
o 8
                                                                                        *l0 l ,.
f l,.
                            '                                                        /
/ /e.,
              ~'''N$~     ,
4, '.
4f/4:':,,''' t $'k e
f
                                          '~
~f,$~ !,
                                                                              /,
*l0 2
                                        $~$Y .,fe/                                  f'/Y'{4
/~
                                          ~
~'''N$~ '' t $'k
$~$Y f'/Y'{4
/
4f/4:':,,'
/,
'~
e
~
s#a
s#a
                                                                                                /e   4, s,.
/e 4,
                                      ',~ e#+!o,                   s                               ~
l*'"$.'+*?*l~/e,
j N                      '
',~ e#+!o, s,.
                                                        /~ f'                   +
.,fe/ j
        >%                  o'
~
                              '/
s
y l*'"$.'+*?*l~/e,
/~ f' N
                                                                              ! 5
'/
                                                                              *'        /
+
4 N
! 5 4
v e
t
t
                                                        "'' ,. &s s
/
4/
o' y
y j #
v j',
                                                                                          $p j',
e s
                  \t                                          ,.
j N
J e e$/~$.e 4,4.t         .e/f
"'',. &s y e$/~$.e 4/
                                                                                      ~
\\t
                                                                                        /
~
                                                                                          ~s
$p 4,4.t.e/f ~s f
                      \x,,                        ,
e
                                                                      '/
/
f
J
                                                                      " . *'/ /,/
\\
4~    e*e,      rsf
f 4~
                                                                                                  /~~"p 8
'/
                                                                                                        \
e*e, rs x,,
if             sfl."
". *'/ /,/
N                        x..fg/pff )
/~~"p 8
\\
if sfl."
.x..fg/pff )
N


7;
7; Appendix "A"
                    .                                                            Appendix "A"
* ~
            * ~
PHASE I PROJECT SURVEY
PHASE I PROJECT SURVEY
        ;: c'         Based on our experience in providing project completion assistance on similar projects we recommend the following sequence and scope of survey activities in preparation for the overall management of the W.H. Zimmer Nuclaar Power l             Station.
: c; '
3               A. Management review of project organization and status of job - Has been completed for the purpose of selecting the review team.
Based on our experience in providing project completion assistance on similar projects we recommend the following sequence and scope of survey activities in preparation for the overall management of the W.H. Zimmer Nuclaar Power l
    .;              B. Assemble survey team - Complete, on standby, and immediately available i                     for Zim=er.
Station.
,    4 1
3 A.
h                     Combined team wi.1 be backed up by senior management support and will provide proven capability in the following areas:
Management review of project organization and status of job - Has been completed for the purpose of selecting the review team.
2                     -
B.
Project Management / Construction Management expe rience Recent nuclear expertise Project controls
Assemble survey team - Complete, on standby, and immediately available i
(!i                   -
for Zim=er.
4 1
h Combined team wi.1 be backed up by senior management support and will provide proven capability in the following areas:
2 Project Management / Construction Management expe rience Recent nuclear expertise
(!
Project controls i
Current Quality Control programs Managerial capability i
Current Quality Control programs Managerial capability i
      )i            C. Survey Tasks l                     1. Review Project Controls 1
)
: a. Overall integration of project schedules:
C.
: 1. Milestone Summary Schedule 4
Survey Tasks i
: 2. Engineering, Procurement, Construction & System Turnover Schedule i                             3. On going QC inspection planning
l 1.
    .i                                                                                   .
Review Project Controls 1
        ]                             4. QCP inspection /re-work schedule 3
a.
d                                 5. Detailed work plans for designers, craf tsmen
Overall integration of project schedules:
: b. System Completion & Turnover Process
1.
: c. Design change control (Use of design " Freeze" and Design Change
Milestone Summary Schedule 2.
    .j                               PackEge approach)*
Engineering, Procurement, Construction & System Turnover 4
y
Schedule i
: d. Field change control q                            e. System & Facility configuration control
3.
: f. Cost control I                       g. Administrative control j               2. Quality Cottrol
On going QC inspection planning
{                     a. Review program for compatibility of representative
.i
    .j                               specification, drawings, quality control instructions and construction work plans e
]
: i.                                                                                   '
4.
s q                 b. Review adiquacy cf organization, program, and staf fing.
QCP inspection /re-work schedule 3
t
d 5.
      'l ' -            c. Quality Control for remaining work
Detailed work plans for designers, craf tsmen b.
: 1. Review of vendor and contractor certification and j                           docume ntation                                             _a
System Completion & Turnover Process c.
      ;                                                                                                m
Design change control (Use of design " Freeze" and Design Change
: 2. Action plan for closecut of NCRs
.j PackEge approach)*
: d. Quality Confirmation Program j                       1. Completeness and adequacy
y' d.
: 2. Action plan for closeout of NCRs                   .
Field change control e.
* e. Review interfaces between QA, QC, craft supervisionf field engineering and resident engineering j                 f. Review program for training and certification of QC, inspectors 4
System & Facility configuration control q
_]                 3. Review Construction Organization                                   ., '
f.
N j                 a. Responsibilities and reporting relationships of field
Cost control I
      )                       engineers. How do they interface with resident engineers, superintendents - systems or area basis?
g.
6                 b. Who assembles quality documentation for field work.
Administrative control j
: c. Cost and Schedule controls; who develops and maintains?
2.
                )
Quality Cottrol
[                 d '. Craf t training and indoctrination for nuclear work.
{
i                 e. Procurement and Warehousing controls
a.
: 4. Review Nuclear Regulatory Commission Interfaces and Communication
Review program for compatibility of representative
: a. Does official contact point exist at appropriate, level of CG&E organization for:
.j specification, drawings, quality control instructions and construction work plans e
    ![                         1. Licensing M
 
: 2. Region III i
i.
        !              b. Is staffing level and authority adequate to provide timely
s q
      ';                      respbnse of best *information with minimum impact on project operation?
b.
l             c. Are appropriate people involved in NRC communication process?
Review adiquacy cf organization, program, and staf fing.
t c.
Quality Control for remaining work
'l ' -
1.
Review of vendor and contractor certification and j
docume ntation
_a m
2.
Action plan for closecut of NCRs d.
Quality Confirmation Program j
1.
Completeness and adequacy 2.
Action plan for closeout of NCRs e.
Review interfaces between QA, QC, craft supervisionf field engineering and resident engineering j
f.
Review program for training and certification of QC, inspectors 4
_]
3.
Review Construction Organization N
j a.
Responsibilities and reporting relationships of field
)
engineers.
How do they interface with resident engineers, superintendents - systems or area basis?
6 b.
Who assembles quality documentation for field work.
c.
Cost and Schedule controls; who develops and maintains?
)
[
d '.
Craf t training and indoctrination for nuclear work.
i e.
Procurement and Warehousing controls 4.
Review Nuclear Regulatory Commission Interfaces and Communication a.
Does official contact point exist at appropriate, level of CG&E organization for:
![
1.
Licensing M
2.
Region III i
b.
Is staffing level and authority adequate to provide timely respbnse of best *information with minimum impact on project operation?
l c.
Are appropriate people involved in NRC communication process?
(e.g. Exit Int erviews)
(e.g. Exit Int erviews)
        ;              (. Who is responsible for managing timely resolution of 50.55 (e) i                    open issues, Title 21 issues?
(.
A
Who is responsible for managing timely resolution of 50.55 (e) open issues, Title 21 issues?
: e. How are impacts of open issues recognized or reflected in project schedule?
i e.
    ;[
How are impacts of open issues recognized or reflected in
3                                               -
;[ A project schedule?
3


t
t
                                =     A
,s
              ,s
=
    ,%?                                                           .
A
                                    ~5. R view Status of Engineering for:
,%?
3                                   a. Outstanding design issues not yet issued for construction, if any.                     3,
~5.
            --                                                          ?
R view Status of Engineering for:
i                                   b. Dispositioning'of'NCRs from QCP.
3 a.
: c. Open issues with NRC licensing group (NRR).
Outstanding design issues not yet issued for construction, if any.
            ._                          d. Status of Operati'ng License SSER, ACRS Letter, and Public 4           "
3,
Hearing,
?
: s.                                                               ,,
i b.
4 j                        D.      Survey Process
Dispositioning'of'NCRs from QCP.
                                  ~
c.
: 1. Interview key peoplh regarding:
Open issues with NRC licensing group (NRR).
: a. Scope of responsibility            -
d.
                ^
Status of Operati'ng License SSER, ACRS Letter, and Public 4
            ~'
: Hearing, s.
: b. Scope of authority                      /
4 j
E                                    c. Backkround and experience
: d. - Problem Areas I
j                              2. Obtain and review project procedures and reports for:
    ~
    ,                                                                              I j                                    a. Monthly progress reports for E'agineering, Procurement, y                                          Construction and Start-up l
: b. Scheaule and Cost fore, cast        '
i
: c.    ' Project Procedure Manuals for CG&R and Kaiser i,                                  d. QA & QC Manuals (CG&E and Kaiser)
    .                        E. Key People to be interviewed j                                                                                                      -
l                              Cincinnati Gas & Electric E.A. Borgmann          -
Senior Vice-President & Project Manager i                                    B.R. Sylvia            -
Vic e-Pre side nt , Startup & Nuclear Operations 4
                              .          H.R. Sager            -
Quality Assurance Manager i
J.F. Shaffer          -
Quality Confir=ation Program Manager B.K. Culver.          - .            Construction Manager j                                    H.C. Brinicaann        -
Nuclear Engineering Manager J.R. Schott      -      -
Nuclear Production Manager
  ,j                                     J.D. Flynn            -
Nuclear Licensing Manager i                                    K.K. Chitkara          -
Nuclear Service Manager Tj
    ;                              H.J. Kaiser M. Albertin          -
Project Manager W. Hedzik            -
Site QA Managet r'
  ]1    #                              C.
B.
D.
D.
H.
Survey Process
Stanfield Scott Davis Vitale Construction Manager Estimating & Cost Control Manager QC Manager Quality Engineer Manager l                                 C. Power               -
~
Records Manager k                                                                        ,
1.
a r
Interview key peoplh regarding:
a.
Scope of responsibility
^
~'
b.
Scope of authority
/
Backkround and experience E
c.
d.
- Problem Areas Ij 2.
Obtain and review project procedures and reports for:
I
~
Monthly progress reports for E'agineering, Procurement, j
a.
y Construction and Start-up l
b.
Scheaule and Cost fore, cast i
c.
' Project Procedure Manuals for CG&R and Kaiser i,
d.
QA & QC Manuals (CG&E and Kaiser)
E.
Key People to be interviewed j
l Cincinnati Gas & Electric E.A. Borgmann Senior Vice-President & Project Manager i
B.R. Sylvia Vic e-Pre side nt, Startup & Nuclear Operations H.R. Sager Quality Assurance Manager 4
i J.F. Shaffer Quality Confir=ation Program Manager B.K. Culver.
Construction Manager j
H.C. Brinicaann Nuclear Engineering Manager J.R. Schott Nuclear Production Manager
,j J.D. Flynn Nuclear Licensing Manager i
K.K. Chitkara Nuclear Service Manager Tj H.J. Kaiser M. Albertin Project Manager W. Hedzik Site QA Managet C. Stanfield Construction Manager r
B. Scott Estimating & Cost Control Manager
]
D. Davis QC Manager 1
H. Vitale Quality Engineer Manager l
C. Power Records Manager ka r


_ .~                                 _          ..  ,. _                              . . _ . . _ .                  . _ - . _ . _ - . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . - - .. _ . . _ _ .__ ..__- - . _ . _ _ . - - . .
_.~
                ?l;                       ._
?l; h
h
c1
.          c1                                 o,                                                ' NUCLEAR REGULATORY CO!CIISSION                                                                                                                             - 'l
' NUCLEAR REGULATORY CO!CIISSION
                                                                                                                    ~
- l o,
h;        i                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       .
h;
ry                                                                                                                                                                                                         *
~
(                                                                                                             Resident-Inspector 4         ,j                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     l
i ry
          -. s                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     ,
(
-       ;e i                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 i.
Resident-Inspector 4
a SARGENT & LUNDY-                                                                                                                                             4
,j l
; y-                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               ,
-. s i
1 1
- ;e i
-l - j                                                                                                                       Resident Project Engineer
i SARGENT & LUNDY-a 4
; y-1 1
-l - j Resident Project Engineer
;e i;b
;e i;b
                          ~
}O HARTFORD INSURANCE I
}O HARTFORD INSURANCE                                                                                                                                           I y
~
    - .5 Q           .
y
Authorized Inspector                                                                                                                 i
-.5 Q
'.s , :,F,3                                                                          .
'. : 3 Authorized Inspector i
2 -. 'h .i r
s,,F, 2. 'h r
l M,                                                                                               STATE OF OHIO
-.i l M, STATE OF OHIO
      ..'I, j                                               -
..'I, j
1 iL-
1 iL-
                                                                                                                        . Doller a Pressure Vessel Licensing Agency .                                                                                       -i P6                               .                                                                                                                                                                                                                              !
. Doller a Pressure Vessel Licensing Agency.
: ' c'               '
- i P6
l;4 W                                                                                                                     4 l
: ' c' l;4 W
1 h                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   r i                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 ;
4 l
[2     .,s                                                                                                                                                                                                             a 1
1 h
j ,
r i
* 1 1                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  'e-f
[2
! ~. f1 t .                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 -
.,s a
: g.    . .                                            ..
1 j,
      ,j l .fb                                                                                                                             .                                  .                                                                                            j
1
    .1                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            l 1
! ~. f1 e - f 1
. . .0 l - !!                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             :
t.
,      s                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     . I h ^[
g.
t         r l'J:                                                                                                                                                                           '
,j
I, lL                           .
'.fb l
                    .s.
j l
  .v o ,' .                        .
. 1
.. 0 1
l - !!
s
. I h
^[
t r
l'J:
I, lL
. v
.s.
{
{
in                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 i
o,'.
;'H -
in i
i
;'H
{
{
g o
i g
4 k
o 4
s            --.,-,.r,.                   - , -    , , - . . , . . . . _ . , _ , _ , - - , . - . . . . , , , ,                      .    .,      ..n._n,,,,,,-n.-                         _.__,,, , , ., , , ,m,   ,e,w,.m,,,-,,,r.,,,.,,,,,,.-gm       .,,
k s
--.,-,.r,.
..n._n,,,,,,-n.-
_.__,,,,,.,,,,m,
,e,w,.m,,,-,,,r.,,,.,,,,,,.-gm


                                                                                      ' t tt 4
' t tt 4e a 41 t
e a
m)'d-g Hxb m
                                                                                        <  t41g m)'d-xb H
Vf J
                                                                                          $m JVf f
f
                                                                                            ~
.~
tr b
tr b
a s<
a s<
t%
t%
  'i O                                                                                     -
'i O
i
i
(
(
1
1
                                                                                            ?
?
g a             O f
g a
                                                                                              .',k
O f
                                                                                          'hM t
.',k
'hM t
k W
k W
h 1
h 1
l h
l h
v.
v.
r
r m
                        , , , _ . m   _ . _ - - _ , ,  -. - . - . , . -


!n I
n I
5 i
5 i
f Appendix B - Survey Team and Resumes 1
f Appendix B - Survey Team and Resumes 1: I 1
: I 1
I
I
}                                           -
}
i i
i i
?
?
Line 431: Line 604:


I i
I i
  .j       '  '
.j Survey Team t',
t',
)
                  )
a 1
Survey Team a
l Project Operations
1     -
- George Jones
l             Project Operations             - George Jones
* I i
* I i             Construction                   - Claude Turbow Don Stover * (Alt.)
Construction
j j             Project Controls               - Dick Soderholm I
- Claude Turbow Don Stover * (Alt.)
1 QA/QC                           - Bob Scott
j j
Project Controls
- Dick Soderholm I
1 QA/QC
- Bob Scott
* Gary Stanley
* Gary Stanley
* Code - Welding Inspection       - Larry Campbell i                                                 Tom Fallon* (Alt.)
* Code - Welding Inspection
[j                 Startup Turnovers               - John Walker (part-time) 4 The survey team will be headed up by George Jones and will report to Bill Henry, Vice-President and Deputy General Manager
- Larry Campbell i
    'i                of the Ann Arbor Power Division, i
Tom Fallon* (Alt.)
[j Startup Turnovers
- John Walker (part-time) 4 The survey team will be headed up by George Jones and will report to Bill Henry, Vice-President and Deputy General Manager of the Ann Arbor Power Division,
'i i
* Available for permanent Zimmer Project Team.
* Available for permanent Zimmer Project Team.
1
1
(
(
l u                                                                         .
l u
1 i
1i
  ~l 1
~l 1Il
Il
.i 1
  .i 1
l
l


(
(
GEORGE B. JONES POSITION           Project Manager EDUCATION         BS, Electrical Engineering, University of California MS, Mechanical Engineering, Naval Post-graduate School PROFESSIONAL       Registered Professional Engineer in I           DATA                 California Member, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Member, American Society of Naval Engineers Member, Project Management Institute
GEORGE B. JONES POSITION Project Manager EDUCATION BS, Electrical Engineering, University of California MS, Mechanical Engineering, Naval Post-graduate School PROFESSIONAL Registered Professional Engineer in I
DATA California Member, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Member, American Society of Naval Engineers Member, Project Management Institute


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
          '6 years:       Project manager 2-1/2 years:     Engineering manager 9 months:       Deputy engineering manager 3-1/2 years:     Shipyard commander 1 year:         Deputy, fleet maintenance 5 years:       Planning / production officer p        EXPERIENCE 4 years:       Head of Piping, Valves, and Machinery Arrangement Branch Mr. Jones was Project manager of Hope Creek Unit 1 & 2, 1,100 MW BWRs for Public Service Electric & Gas Company. He is currently managing the close out operation on Unit 2.
'6 years:
Earlier, Mr. Jones was engineering manager for the following projects: Pilgrim 1 and 2 for Boston Edison Company; Jim Bridger 1, 2, 3, and 4 for Idaho Power & Light Company; Hope Creek for Public Service i
Project manager 2-1/2 years:
Engineering manager 9 months:
Deputy engineering manager 3-1/2 years:
Shipyard commander 1 year:
Deputy, fleet maintenance 5 years:
Planning / production officer 4 years:
Head of Piping, Valves, and p
Machinery Arrangement Branch EXPERIENCE Mr. Jones was Project manager of Hope Creek Unit 1 & 2, 1,100 MW BWRs for Public Service Electric & Gas Company.
He is currently managing the close out operation on Unit 2.
Earlier, Mr. Jones was engineering manager for the following projects:
Pilgrim 1 and 2 for Boston Edison Company; Jim Bridger 1, 2,
3, and 4 for Idaho Power & Light Company; Hope Creek for Public Service i
Electric & Gas Company; and Humboldt Bay
Electric & Gas Company; and Humboldt Bay
{                             for Pacific Gas & Electric Company. He 4
{
                              ~
for Pacific Gas & Electric Company.
also served as coordinator for Bechtel l                             Power Corporation with respect to the use of automatic pipe welding equipment.
He also served as coordinator for Bechtel 4
Mr. Jones joined Bechtel in January 1971 as deputy engineering manager for the Hope j                             Creek Project.
l Power Corporation with respect to the use
~
of automatic pipe welding equipment.
Mr. Jones joined Bechtel in January 1971 as deputy engineering manager for the Hope j
Creek Project.
i l
i l
E
E


          ; GEORGE B. JONES (Cont'd)
GEORGE B. JONES (Cont'd)
Prior to joining Bechtel, Mr. Jones was shipyard commander with the U.S. Department of the Navy'where he was responsible for all aspects of industrial operstions of shipyard activity and the supervision of 6,500 people. Mr. Jones's thirty years of naval experience includes positions as deputy in charge of fleet maintenance, planning production officer, and head of the Piping, Valves and Machinery i
Prior to joining Bechtel, Mr. Jones was shipyard commander with the U.S.
Department of the Navy'where he was responsible for all aspects of industrial operstions of shipyard activity and the supervision of 6,500 people.
Mr. Jones's thirty years of naval experience includes positions as deputy in charge of fleet maintenance, planning production officer, and head of the Piping, Valves and Machinery i
Arrangement Branch.
Arrangement Branch.
REFERENCE           Mr. Tom Martin Vice President Engineering & Construction Public Service Electric & Gas (of New Jeracy)
REFERENCE Mr. Tom Martin Vice President Engineering & Construction Public Service Electric & Gas (of New Jeracy)
(201) 430-7000, Extension 8316 i
(201) 430-7000, Extension 8316 i
i t
i t
9 I
, 9 I
f 1
f 1
1                         .          .
1 i
i                         -
k l
k l
b i
b i
Line 484: Line 680:
l' i
l' i
4 l
4 l
4 j
4j Lt i
Lt i
#l
  #l
]
    ]
4 1
4 1
1 Claude Turbow
1 Claude Turbow
  'f         Resume to follow j
'f Resume to follow j
I l
I l
I u
I u
k,
k,
'i I
'i I
l
l
    /
/


i.
i.
DONALD M. STOVER y =:
DONALD M.
    ; ~>  POSITION         Project Superintendent
STOVER y =:
    !      EDUCATION       BS, Civil Engineering, University of Maine PROFESSIONAL     Professional Structural Engineer, Massachusetts i     DATA             Licensed to Practice, Province of Newfoundland
POSITION Project Superintendent
~>
EDUCATION BS, Civil Engineering, University of Maine PROFESSIONAL Professional Structural Engineer, Massachusetts i
DATA Licensed to Practice, Province of Newfoundland


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
5 years:   Project superintendent 1 year:   Project superintendent j                         3 years:   Field superintendent
5 years:
  ,                        3 years:   Staff assistant to construction manager 2 years:   Assistant manager of construction j                         2 years:   Construction manager j                         1 year:   Project manager i                         4 years:   Resident field manager j                         6 years:   Structural designer and group leader P
Project superintendent 1 year:
EXPERIENCE       Mr. Stover is currently project superintendent j                         on 1100 MW BWR Hope Creek project responsible for field supervision of services g
Project superintendent j
4 which includes field subcontract administration.
3 years:
f                         Act for field construction manager in his absence, f
Field superintendent 3 years:
f
Staff assistant to construction manager 2 years:
  'j                        Mr. Stover was project superintendent of
Assistant manager of construction j
    .                      services in Bechtel's San Francisco Power
2 years:
    '                      Division assigned to the Nuclear Fast Flux i                         Test Facility.
Construction manager j
.t As field superintendent, Mr. Stover was re-sponsible for all construction activities.
1 year:
b                                                           ,
Project manager i
1                        Mr. Stover was staff assistant to construction j                         manager responsible for coordinating construc-tion department activities on four thermal j
4 years:
j                        power stations.
Resident field manager j
          ~
6 years:
Mr. Stover was assistant manager of construc-j                         tion for Acres Canadian Bechtel of Churchill j
Structural designer and group leader P
                          ~
EXPERIENCE Mr. Stover is currently project superintendent j
Falls and he was responsible for field activities j                         including inspection, administration, scheduling 3
on 1100 MW BWR Hope Creek project responsible for field supervision of services g
which includes field subcontract administration.
4 f
Act for field construction manager in his f
: absence, f
Mr. Stover was project superintendent of
'j services in Bechtel's San Francisco Power Division assigned to the Nuclear Fast Flux i
Test Facility.
.t As field superintendent, Mr. Stover was re-sponsible for all construction activities.
b 1
Mr. Stover was staff assistant to construction j
manager responsible for coordinating construc-j tion department activities on four thermal j
power stations.
~
Mr. Stover was assistant manager of construc-j tion for Acres Canadian Bechtel of Churchill j
~
Falls and he was responsible for field activities j
including inspection, administration, scheduling 3
and cost reporting.
and cost reporting.
4 i
4 i
As construction manager of Acres Canadian Bechtel of Churchill Falls, Mr. Stover was responsible for initial construction activities, definition and scope of major field construction j                           contracts and administration of active field contracts.
As construction manager of Acres Canadian Bechtel of Churchill Falls, Mr. Stover was responsible for initial construction activities, definition and scope of major field construction j
contracts and administration of active field contracts.
1
1
{
{
Mr. Stover was project manager of ammonia y                           fertilizer complex for Bechtel Corporation.
Mr. Stover was project manager of ammonia y
fertilizer complex for Bechtel Corporation.
l
l


e t-i i     DONALD M. STOVER (Cont'd) 1-3 i
e t-i i
j                       Mr. Stover was resident field manager of
DONALD M. STOVER (Cont'd) 1-3 i
        ,                      Twin Falls Power Corporation on 4-unit hydro plant. He prepared scope of contracts; l                      participated in bid reviews and awards; admini-stered all site construction contracts; pre-4 pared cost and progress reports; commissioned y
j Mr. Stover was resident field manager of Twin Falls Power Corporation on 4-unit l
hydro plant.
He prepared scope of contracts; participated in bid reviews and awards; admini-stered all site construction contracts; pre-pared cost and progress reports; commissioned 4
and turned over plant to operating personnel.
and turned over plant to operating personnel.
  'l         REFERENCE       Mr. Pete Kudless Public Service Electric & Gas (New Jersey)
y
'l REFERENCE Mr. Pete Kudless Public Service Electric & Gas (New Jersey)
(609) 935-7400 i
(609) 935-7400 i
4 1
4 1
4
4
?.
?.
3
3
  ~>
~>
d 1
d 1
  'l
'l a
* a b
b 4
4 i
i 4
4 ;


I,.
I,.
RICHARD W. SODERHOLM Nm.-
RICHARD W.
POSITION               Technical Services Manager EDUCATION               BS, Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Berkeley
SODERHOLM Nm.-
    ;                                      Management Program, Bechtel 1.
POSITION Technical Services Manager EDUCATION BS, Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Berkeley Management Program, Bechtel 1.
k
k


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
2 months:       Technical services manager l-1/2 years:     Project superintendent 1 year:         Field cost and scheduling j                                                         supervisor j                                         4-1/2 years:     Cost and scheduling
2 months:
    ,                                                        supervisor i
Technical services manager l-1/2 years:
7 months:       Assistant cost and scheduling supervisor
Project superintendent 1 year:
  ;                                        1 year:         Staff assistant j
Field cost and scheduling j
2 years:         Corporate budget coordinator i                                         1 year:
supervisor j
2 Senior cost engineer 1-1/2 years:     Cost engineer
4-1/2 years:
  !                                        3 years:         Field cost engineer
Cost and scheduling supervisor i
{                   EXPERIENCE             Mr. Soderholm is currently technical j                                         services manager responsible for technical i       -7     '
7 months:
guidance and personnel administration of i
Assistant cost and scheduling supervisor 1 year:
(
Staff assistant j
division technical services personnel on j           ,-                           the Midland nuclear project.
2 years:
Corporate budget coordinator i
1 year:
Senior cost engineer 2
1-1/2 years:
Cost engineer 3 years:
Field cost engineer
{
EXPERIENCE Mr. Soderholm is currently technical j
services manager responsible for technical i
-7 guidance and personnel administration of i
division technical services personnel on j
(,-
the Midland nuclear project.
e
e
]                                         Previously, Mr. Soderholm was project superintendent of construction services for j
]
Previously, Mr. Soderholm was project superintendent of construction services for j
the Midland nuclear project responsible for
the Midland nuclear project responsible for
{                                         managing the following groups onsite:
{
i                                         subcontracts, cost and scheduling, office
managing the following groups onsite:
  }                                         services, document control, fin'ance and l
i subcontracts, cost and scheduling, office
accounting, procurement, safety, and j                                         personnel.
}
i Mr. Soderholm transferred to the Ann Arbor i
services, document control, fin'ance and l
Power Division in March 1980 as field cost scheduling supervisor assigned to Midland l                                   .      Units.1 and 2. He was responsible for all j                                   -
accounting, procurement, safety, and j
personnel.
i Mr. Soderholm transferred to the Ann Arbor Power Division in March 1980 as field cost i
scheduling supervisor assigned to Midland l
Units.1 and 2.
He was responsible for all j
planning, scheduling, and cost control j
planning, scheduling, and cost control j
programs, which included productivity monitoring and control, field trending, and i                                         preparing all construction schedules.
programs, which included productivity monitoring and control, field trending, and i
i While serving as cost and scheduling supervisor at the San Francisco Power
preparing all construction schedules.
!                                          Diviaion, Mr. Soderholm was assigned to the Pebble Springs and Pilgrim 2 nuclear projects. He was responsible for implementing all planning and scheduling, I
While serving as cost and scheduling i
supervisor at the San Francisco Power Diviaion, Mr. Soderholm was assigned to the Pebble Springs and Pilgrim 2 nuclear projects.
He was responsible for implementing all planning and scheduling, I
i 4
i 4
I
I


i
i
-)
-)
I l           RICllARD W. SODERIIOLM (Cont'd)
I l
{                                 cost control, and quantity tracking q                               programs in the office, and for the initial 9
RICllARD W. SODERIIOLM (Cont'd)
{
cost control, and quantity tracking q
programs in the office, and for the initial 9
development of similar programs for the field.
development of similar programs for the field.
Previously, Mr. Soderholm was staff
Previously, Mr. Soderholm was staff assistant to the general manager of the Thermal Power Organization (TPO).
    ;'                                  assistant to the general manager of the Thermal Power Organization (TPO). He reviewed correspondence and procurement authorizations and prepared and coordinated 3                                  presentations.
He reviewed correspondence and procurement authorizations and prepared and coordinated presentations.
1 s,         i                           Mr. Soderholm was corporate budget y
3 1
coordinator for two years. !!e was J                                     responsible for coordinating overhead budgeting activities for Bechtel Group, Inc.
s, i
Mr. Soderholm was corporate budget coordinator for two years.
!!e was y
J responsible for coordinating overhead budgeting activities for Bechtel Group, Inc.
During his tenure with Bechtel, Mr.
During his tenure with Bechtel, Mr.
Soderholm has also served as senior cost engineer, cost engineer, and field cost engineer.
Soderholm has also served as senior cost engineer, cost engineer, and field cost engineer.
?
?
REFERENCE             Mr. Don Miller - Midland Site Manager Consumers Power Company q                                       (517) 631-8210 1
REFERENCE Mr. Don Miller - Midland Site Manager Consumers Power Company q
(517) 631-8210 1
i i
i i
i                                                                   -
i bJ I
b J
J 1
I J
i
1 i
)
  )
3, 4
3, 4


l,     ROBERT L. SCOTT POSITION         Assistant to Manager of Quality EDUCATION         Business Management General Studies, Southern Illinois University; various company-sponsored i                       courses such as Fundamentals of Computer
$l, ROBERT L.
      ,                      Systems. Basic Radiographic Interpretation, j                           Effective Writing, Nondestructive Testing, and Auditor Training.
SCOTT POSITION Assistant to Manager of Quality EDUCATION Business Management General Studies, Southern Illinois University; various company-sponsored i
3, J         PROFESSIONAL     Registered Professional Quality Engineer 4       DATA             in State of California; Member, American Society Quality Control
courses such as Fundamentals of Computer Systems.
  .g     .
Basic Radiographic Interpretation, j
EXPERIENCE       Presently assigned as assistant to the 9                           Bechtel Manager of Quality at the Washington i                           Nuclear Power Station (WNP-2) for Washington
Effective Writing, Nondestructive Testing, and Auditor Training.
  $                          Public Power Supply System. Responsible for technical direction of the construction
3, J
      .                      Quality Control program.
PROFESSIONAL Registered Professional Quality Engineer 4
s f                         Manager, Documentation Engineering - Bechtel j                         Power Corp. Assigned as consulting Documenta-4                           tion Engineering Manager to a major mechanical 1                           contractor at the Washington Nuclear Power 1                           Station, Unit Number 2 for Washington Public
DATA in State of California; Member, American Society Quality Control
  )                           Power Supply System. Responsible for direction i                             and management of a quality documentation review and correction program, to enable q
.g EXPERIENCE Presently assigned as assistant to the 9
j                            certification of records necessary for nuclear plant licensing.   (1 year)
Bechtel Manager of Quality at the Washington i
Project Quality Assurance Manager - Bechtel J                           Power Corp. Assigned as project Duality
Nuclear Power Station (WNP-2) for Washington Public Power Supply System.
-                            Assurance Manager to the Grand Gulf Nuclear Power Station, two 1300 MW BWR units for 3                         Mississippi Power and Light Company. Re-l                         sponsible for direction and control of the
Responsible for technical direction of the construction Quality Control program.
    ,                        project quality assurance program, as well J                         as direction and management of project quality
s f
    ?
Manager, Documentation Engineering - Bechtel j
                          ,- assurance activities.   (4 years) i                             Project Quality Assurance Engineer - Bechtel Power Corp. Served as project Quality Assur-ance Engineer on the 950 MW PWR Arkansas
Power Corp.
,) ~
Assigned as consulting Documenta-4 tion Engineering Manager to a major mechanical 1
Nuclear One - Unit 2 for Arkansas Power and Light Company. Responsible for direction and control of the quality assurance program, representing the project on project related
contractor at the Washington Nuclear Power 1
  ,                          quality assurance matters.     (4 years) i.
Station, Unit Number 2 for Washington Public
)
Power Supply System.
Responsible for direction i
and management of a quality documentation q
review and correction program, to enable j
certification of records necessary for nuclear plant licensing.
(1 year)
Project Quality Assurance Manager - Bechtel J
Power Corp.
Assigned as project Duality Assurance Manager to the Grand Gulf Nuclear Power Station, two 1300 MW BWR units for 3
Mississippi Power and Light Company.
Re-l sponsible for direction and control of the project quality assurance program, as well J
as direction and management of project quality assurance activities.
(4 years)
?
i Project Quality Assurance Engineer - Bechtel Power Corp.
Served as project Quality Assur-ance Engineer on the 950 MW PWR Arkansas
,)
Nuclear One - Unit 2 for Arkansas Power and
~
Light Company.
Responsible for direction and control of the quality assurance program, representing the project on project related quality assurance matters.
(4 years) i.
ri
ri
:l i
:li 1
1


i 1
i 1
      -}.
-}.
q
q ROBERT L. SCOTT (Cont'd) i TU j
          ,      ROBERT L. SCOTT (Cont'd) i     TU j                           Manager of Quality Assurance - Westinghouse
Manager of Quality Assurance - Westinghouse Nuclear Energy Systems Division.
        '                        Nuclear Energy Systems Division. Before l                         joining Bechtel, was an equal partner / owner l                         of a steel fabrication and design company.
Before l
1                         Prior to this, was Manager of Quality Assurance 8
joining Bechtel, was an equal partner / owner l
in the Heat Transfer Division of Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Formerly was the
of a steel fabrication and design company.
      .                          West Coast Quality Assurance Representative
1 Prior to this, was Manager of Quality Assurance 8
'j' and Senior Quality Engineer for Westinghouse Nuclear Energy Systems Division. Responsible for source surveillance / auditing of Westing-house suppliers of NSSS components in California, s
in the Heat Transfer Division of Westinghouse Electric Corporation.
Washington, Arizona and Colorado. Previously q                             was responsible for quality assurance program D                                 and records planning for Westinghouse NES quality assurance consulting efforts for a d.1                               utility, nuclear projects balance-of-plant i                                 equipment.   (3 years)
Formerly was the West Coast Quality Assurance Representative
    ^
.'j and Senior Quality Engineer for Westinghouse Nuclear Energy Systems Division.
Product Assurance Coordinator - Quality Engineering - Lockheed Propulsion Company; Unidynamics and Other. While with Lockheed
Responsible for source surveillance / auditing of Westing-house suppliers of NSSS components in California, Washington, Arizona and Colorado.
,4                               Propulsion Company, was a Product Assurance 1                           Coordinator involved in quality engineering
Previously s
    'J                             activities related to manufacturing planning I                             of Navy nuclear reactor internal (core) i                               components. Previous positions included j                               Production / Quality Engineer initiating i                           quality control inspection procedures for Unidynamics, St. Louis, and Manager of Quality Assurance for Scott Engineering and Welding Service responsible for development and implementation of a program to meet the requirements of MIL-Q-9858A.   (3 years)
q was responsible for quality assurance program D
REFERENCE       Mr. Roger Johnson
and records planning for Westinghouse NES quality assurance consulting efforts for a d.1 utility, nuclear projects balance-of-plant i
%y                                Washington Public Power Supply System
equipment.
                .                  Richland, Washington i                           (509) 377-2522 cxt. 2712 y                         .          .
(3 years)
.s   1 sa 1
^
Product Assurance Coordinator - Quality Engineering - Lockheed Propulsion Company; Unidynamics and Other.
While with Lockheed
,4 Propulsion Company, was a Product Assurance 1
Coordinator involved in quality engineering
'J activities related to manufacturing planning I
of Navy nuclear reactor internal (core) i components.
Previous positions included j
Production / Quality Engineer initiating i
quality control inspection procedures for Unidynamics, St. Louis, and Manager of Quality Assurance for Scott Engineering and Welding Service responsible for development and implementation of a program to meet the requirements of MIL-Q-9858A.
(3 years)
%y REFERENCE Mr. Roger Johnson Washington Public Power Supply System Richland, Washington i
(509) 377-2522 cxt. 2712 y
.s 1
sa 1
-t
-t
  .]
.]y
y
:)
:)


I i
I i
s '
s s
s
)
                    )   G.W. STANLEY
G.W. STANLEY
{! -        /
{!
l
/
        ;                POSITION         Senior Construction Engineer 4
l POSITION Senior Construction Engineer 4
i EDUCATION       Courses at Kansas State University and Wichita State University i
i EDUCATION Courses at Kansas State University and Wichita State University ij
j                   


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
2 years:         Project field engineer 1-1/2 years:     Systems supe'rintendent and and assistant project field engineer 3-1/2 years:     Project construction quality control engineer 7                                    1 year:         Staff quality control super-9 visor
2 years:
      !                                  3-1/2 years:     Project quality control engi-neer and 1 cad mechanical q                                                         piping quality control engi-3                                                       neer
Project field engineer 1-1/2 years:
(                                   5 years:         Lead quality control planner i
Systems supe'rintendent and and assistant project field engineer 3-1/2 years:
EXPERIENCE     Mr. Stanley is' presently assigned as project field engineer on the BWR Grand
Project construction quality control engineer 1 year:
  ]         /~_,' )
Staff quality control super-79 visor 3-1/2 years:
                  ,)
Project quality control engi-neer and 1 cad mechanical q
piping quality control engi-3 neer
(
5 years:
Lead quality control planner i
EXPERIENCE Mr. Stanley is' presently assigned as project field engineer on the BWR Grand
]
/~_,' )
Gulf Power Station Units 1 and 2, 1,300 MW
Gulf Power Station Units 1 and 2, 1,300 MW
  -jc '/'                                each, for Mississippi Power & Light Company, responsible for supervising and 7                                     directing all field engineering activities.
-jc
He has also served as the project systems superintendent responsible for construction 1                                     completion and release of systems for j                                     startup testing. In addition, he was 1                                     assistant project field engineer on this l                                 project, responsible for supervising Unit 1
,)
    )                                 field engineering activities.
each, for Mississippi Power & Light
'/'
Company, responsible for supervising and 7
directing all field engineering activities.
He has also served as the project systems superintendent responsible for construction 1
completion and release of systems for j
startup testing.
In addition, he was 1
assistant project field engineer on this l
project, responsible for supervising Unit 1
)
field engineering activities.
i Mr. Stanley was previously assigned as project construction quality control engineer for the PWR SNUPPS 1,150 MW Sterling Unit 1 nuclear project for Rochester Gas & Electric Corporation.
i Mr. Stanley was previously assigned as project construction quality control engineer for the PWR SNUPPS 1,150 MW Sterling Unit 1 nuclear project for Rochester Gas & Electric Corporation.
i He was responsible for staffing and c                                     supervising the field construction quality j                                     control organization and implementing the quality control program.
i He was responsible for staffing and c
j                                   Mr. Stanley formerly served as quality control staff supervisor in Bechtel's Gaithersburg office, where he supervised
supervising the field construction quality j
    ,                                  the quality control technical staff and 5
control organization and implementing the quality control program.
n                                                 .
j Mr. Stanley formerly served as quality control staff supervisor in Bechtel's Gaithersburg office, where he supervised the quality control technical staff and 5
1 I
n 1
I


1 h
1 h
a.
a.
    ;  /y j   G.W. STANLEY (Cont'd)
/
J l                           was responsible for the preparation of instructions and procedures, and providing 1
j G.W. STANLEY (Cont'd) y J
l was responsible for the preparation of instructions and procedures, and providing 1
technical guidance to field quality control engineers.
technical guidance to field quality control engineers.
t
t
    }                           Prior to this, Mr. Stanley served as
}
  !                            project construction quality control 1                             engineer on the FiiR Calvert Cliffs
Prior to this, Mr. Stanley served as project construction quality control 1
    }                           Nuclear Power Station Units 1 and 2, I
engineer on the FiiR Calvert Cliffs
880 MW each, for Baltimore Gas & Electric j                           Company. He was also assistant project j                           construction quality control engineer and g                             simultaneously acted as lead quality g                             control engineer for construction testing
}
  ,                              operations. Earlier, he served as lead j                             mechanical / piping quality control engineer, l                           responsible for quality activities for 4
Nuclear Power Station Units 1 and 2, I
:                          the verification of safety-related mechani-cal and piping system installation. He also served on this project as mechanical j                           quality control engineer for inspecting 3       -
880 MW each, for Baltimore Gas & Electric j
Company.
He was also assistant project j
construction quality control engineer and g
simultaneously acted as lead quality g
control engineer for construction testing operations.
Earlier, he served as lead j
mechanical / piping quality control engineer, l
responsible for quality activities for the verification of safety-related mechani-4 cal and piping system installation.
He also served on this project as mechanical j
quality control engineer for inspecting 3
the installation of piping and mechanical
the installation of piping and mechanical
  )/4 activities.
)/
3 ,' ''
activities.
Before joining Bechtel, Mr. Stanley was i                           associated with.The Doeing Company as j                             lead quality control planner.         He planned and developed quality control procedures, evaluated test plans and specifications for facilities installation as well as j                             ground and flight test operations on the j                           Apollo / Saturn program, and dealt exten-sively with the quality records system.
4 3,' ''
REFERENCE       Mr. Tom Cloninger - Project Manager
Before joining Bechtel, Mr. Stanley was i
    ^
associated with.The Doeing Company as j
              ~
lead quality control planner.
Grand Gulf Project Mississippi Power and Light l
He planned and developed quality control procedures, evaluated test plans and specifications for facilities installation as well as j
( 6 0.'.) 4,37-8011, Extension 3784
ground and flight test operations on the j
  )
Apollo / Saturn program, and dealt exten-sively with the quality records system.
1 5
REFERENCE Mr. Tom Cloninger - Project Manager Grand Gulf Project
y I
^
1
~
  ,idll!}                                                           -
Mississippi Power and Light l
)
( 6 0.'.) 4,37-8011, Extension 3784 1
5 y
I 1
,idll!}
4 1
4 1
I h
I h


i   -
i h
h                         .      .
f,,..
f , ,..
LARRY L. CAMPBELL
LARRY L. CAMPBELL
      '              i
(!
(!
(s '
i i
i POSITION'     Quality Control Coordinator 1
' (s '
1 4                 EDUCATION     BS~, Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic
POSITION' Quality Control Coordinator 1
        !.                                  Institute and State University l                   PROFESSIONAL. Certified Level III Mechanical Quality Control DATA             Engineer-
1 4
    !                                    Certified Level III Welding Quality Control Engineer
EDUCATION BS~, Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University l
PROFESSIONAL.
Certified Level III Mechanical Quality Control DATA Engineer-Certified Level III Welding Quality Control Engineer


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
l-1/2 years:   Lead quality control engineer 4 years:       Assistant lead field weld engineer
l-1/2 years:
- 1.                                     1 year:         Senior construction engineer
Lead quality control engineer 4 years:
.q                                       1 year:         Construction engineer h                                     5 years:       Pipefitter EXPERIENCE     Mr. Campbell is currently the quality control 3                                     coordinator in the Ann Arbor Power Division j                                       primarily. responsible for the coordination of activities at the Palisades and Fermi nuclear h                                     jobsites. He provides assistance to the chief
Assistant lead field weld engineer
[-~s                       construction quality control engineer for the
- 1.
                ,)
1 year:
i
Senior construction engineer
  )J j k/
.q 1 year:
remaining nuclear and non-nuclear construction quality control activities within the Ann Arbor
Construction engineer h
  ;                                      Power Division.
5 years:
1 o                                    Previously, Mr. Campbell was the lead quality
Pipefitter EXPERIENCE Mr. Campbell is currently the quality control 3
    !                                    control engineer at the Detroit Edison Fermi 2 j                                     Generating Station, assigned to the client's cons.truction and maintenance quality assurance organization. He supervised the client's quality
coordinator in the Ann Arbor Power Division j
    ,                                    control staff in the performance of inspection
primarily. responsible for the coordination of activities at the Palisades and Fermi nuclear h
[             .                      activities and'the preparation of program j                                       procedures, which included quality control j                                       instructions for construction and maintenance j
jobsites.
* activities performed by contractors or the
He provides assistance to the chief
_j                                       client's maintenance organization. Mr. Campbell   ,
[-~s i
is also a con'sultant for the client on American
construction quality control engineer for the
                                        ' Society of Mechanical Engineers Sections III, IX,   ,
)J,)
and XI, and on American- Welding Society Code matters.
remaining nuclear and non-nuclear construction k/
l                                     Prior to this assignment, Mr. Campbell was the l                                     assistant lead field weld engineer at the Limerick jobsite. He acted as the lead field weld engineer during his absence, directing and N                     coordinating the activities of 28 personnel. He j[~'f.                      was responsible for preparing and writing tech-(f                           nical reports to support jobsite welding acti-vities.
j quality control activities within the Ann Arbor Power Division.
)
1 Previously, Mr. Campbell was the lead quality o
control engineer at the Detroit Edison Fermi 2 j
Generating Station, assigned to the client's cons.truction and maintenance quality assurance organization.
He supervised the client's quality control staff in the performance of inspection
[
activities and'the preparation of program j
procedures, which included quality control j
instructions for construction and maintenance j
activities performed by contractors or the
_j client's maintenance organization.
Mr. Campbell is also a con'sultant for the client on American
' Society of Mechanical Engineers Sections III, IX, and XI, and on American-Welding Society Code matters.
l Prior to this assignment, Mr. Campbell was the l
assistant lead field weld engineer at the Limerick jobsite.
He acted as the lead field weld engineer during his absence, directing and j[~'f.
N coordinating the activities of 28 personnel.
He was responsible for preparing and writing tech-(f nical reports to support jobsite welding acti-vities.
)
i l
i l


i
i LARRY L. CAMPDELL (Cont'd)
      ;                        LARRY L. CAMPDELL (Cont'd)
'^ f Before joining Bechtel, Mr. Campbell held various construction engineering assignments and was pro-moted to senior construction engineer at several nuclear power plants.
Before joining Bechtel, Mr. Campbell held various
He also completed a 4-year l
                  '^ f                        construction engineering assignments and was pro-moted to senior construction engineer at several nuclear power plants. He also completed a 4-year l
pipefitter apprentice program while working at a
pipefitter apprentice program while working at   a nuclear shipbuilding company.
nuclear shipbuilding company.
REFERENCE     Mr. Tullio A. Alessi Director of Project Quality Assurance Fermi Project Detroit Edison Company (313) 586-5513 1
REFERENCE Mr. Tullio A. Alessi Director of Project Quality Assurance Fermi Project Detroit Edison Company (313) 586-5513 1
d 1
d 1
A i
A i
i l
i l
i           -                                                          e l
i e
l                                           '
l l
',1                                         -
',1 e
e a
a d
d 4
4


m       a   a       hm e_o.-_- .%in . - a:. -. - ma   A.-_-L. _A 4--me   -- a.-___.+m       1_.--_-_-             ~       4 .+. + 9A-e._ E6 4W   __m _a_. _.h .J44-.,p.-4_A               ._ -_
m a
t I               e i
a hm e_o.-_-
! l.
.%in a:.
J
-. - ma A.-_-L.
          ,      i . -
_A 4--me a.-___.+m 1_.--_-_-
~
4
.+. +
9A-e._
E6 4W
__m
_a_.
_.h
.J44-.,p.-4_A t
I e
i
! l.
J i. -
s 1.
s 1.
6 1
6 1
3                                                                                                                                                                                                               ,
3 e
e                                                                                                                                                                                                              i 1                                                                                                                                                                                                           ;
i 1
f k
f k
I
I
      =
=
I Tom Fallon I
I*
Resume to follow i
Tom Fallon I
i I                                                                                                                                                                                                                >
Resume to follow i I i
: a,
: a, 4h
{
{
4h
>I F
>I                                                                                                                                                                 -
I-f I
F I-f I                           .
4
4
,4                                                                   .                  *
, 4
:1 4   i i
: 1 i
4 i
1
1
:1
: 1
      .              /
/
f l
f l
34 4
3 4
4


JOHN G. WALKER g
JOHN G. WALKER g
(m,2                                                                           POSITION           Project Manager EDUCATION         BS, Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University                                 ,
(m,2 POSITION Project Manager EDUCATION BS, Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University PROFESSIONAL Registered Professional Mechanical Engineer 9ATA in Texas Registered Professional Nuclear Engineer in California Member, American Nuclear Society
PROFESSIONAL       Registered Professional Mechanical Engineer 9ATA                 in Texas Registered Professional Nuclear Engineer in California Member, American Nuclear Society


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
3 years:   Project manager g                                                                                                                    1 year:   Manager of startup and operating
3 years:
'{                                                                                                                       6 years:
Project manager 1 year:
services Chief startup engineer 2 years:   Project startup engineer 3 years:   Senior startup engineer                                                     ,
Manager of startup and operating g
,                                                                                                                        2 years:   Senior results engineer 3 years:   Results engineer
'{
    ?
services 6 years:
j~<                                                                                                   EXPERIENCE         Mr. Walker is currently project manager for Bechtel's work on~ Detroit Edison's Fermi 2 4
Chief startup engineer 2 years:
project.
Project startup engineer 3 years:
[ \                                                                                               Mr. Walker was manager of startup and operating I                                                                                                   services in Bechtel's San Francisco Power ks'                                                                                               Division. Previously, as chief startup engineer he had overall responsibilities for division startup operations.
Senior startup engineer 2 years:
t As a project startup engineer on a number of projects, Mr. Walker was responsible for total plant startup activities. Previously, as a startup engineer, he was responsible for plant cleaning and flushing and power testing.                                               t I
Senior results engineer 3 years:
Mr. Walker was previously a startup. engineer
Results engineer
,                                                                                                                        on the Great Canadian Oil Sands project where he provided technical direction and coordi-
?
^!                                                                                                                       nation of power plant and utilities startup.
j~<
EXPERIENCE Mr. Walker is currently project manager for Bechtel's work on~ Detroit Edison's Fermi 2 project.
4
[ \\
Mr. Walker was manager of startup and operating I
services in Bechtel's San Francisco Power ks' Division.
Previously, as chief startup engineer he had overall responsibilities for division startup operations.
t As a project startup engineer on a number of projects, Mr. Walker was responsible for total plant startup activities.
Previously, as a startup engineer, he was responsible for plant cleaning and flushing and power testing.
t I
Mr. Walker was previously a startup. engineer on the Great Canadian Oil Sands project where he provided technical direction and coordi-
,^!
nation of power plant and utilities startup.
t f
t f
4
4 t'.
      <                t' .
rj
r j


e i
e i
6 JOHN G. WALKER (Cont'd)
6 JOHN G. WALKER (Cont'd)
        .i                       Prior to join'.ag Bechtel, Mr. Walker was 4                     a. senior results engineer with the Texas Electric Service Company .here, as a plant operations supervi,or, he was in charge of operating person al: he also directed startup of a 550 MWe fossil plant addition.
.i Prior to join'.ag Bechtel, Mr. Walker was 4
: a. senior results engineer with the Texas Electric Service Company.here, as a plant operations supervi,or, he was in charge of operating person al: he also directed startup of a 550 MWe fossil plant addition.
As a results engineer, he prepared and conducted plant performance tests and worked as a shift op'erations supervisor.
As a results engineer, he prepared and conducted plant performance tests and worked as a shift op'erations supervisor.
  ]             REFERENCE       Mr. Harry Tauber 1
]
REFERENCE Mr. Harry Tauber 1
Group Vice President
Group Vice President
'g                             Detroit Edison Company
'g Detroit Edison Company (313) 237-6696
  ';                            (313) 237-6696
<a
<a
$N i
$N i
  '. i
'. i
      -y.
-y.
&+
&+
-C   .
-C i
i l
l a
a
.1 O
  .1
e T
* O e
l d
T l
d
(
(
O 1
O 1
Line 829: Line 1,184:
WILLIAM (BILL) GERALD HENRY 1.
WILLIAM (BILL) GERALD HENRY 1.
1 4
1 4
POSITION             Vic -Presid:nt cnd Deputy General Manager
-{
  -{
POSITION Vic -Presid:nt cnd Deputy General Manager EDUCATION BS, Civil Engineering, University of Washington j
EDUCATION           BS, Civil Engineering, University of Washington j                           BMC, Business Law, University of Washington Registered. Professional Engineer in Alabama i
BMC, Business Law, University of Washington i
PROFESSIONAL
PROFESSIONAL Registered. Professional Engineer in Alabama DATA Contractor's License (BPG), Nevada i
        ;    DATA                 Contractor's License (BPG), Nevada i
I
I      


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
6 months:       Vice-president and deputy i                                               general manager i                           1 year:         Vice-president and manager of division construction 4-1/2 years:     Manager of division con-j                                                   struction j                             6 months:       Deputy manager of division construction 9                                 1-1/2 years:     Manager of construction
6 months:
,;                                5 years:         Construction manager 1-1/2 years:     General superintendent 2-1/2 years:     Project superintendent
Vice-president and deputy i
      ;                            6 months:       Assistant superintendent j                               2 years:         Senior field engineer 3 years:         Field engineer i                               1 year:         Design engineer i
general manager i
2 years:         Heavy equipment supervisor i                               4 years:         Equipment operator 1
1 year:
EXPERIENCE           Currently, Mr. Henry is vice-president 1                               and deputy general manager of the l                           Ann Arbor Power Division.
Vice-president and manager of division construction 4-1/2 years:
a                              Prior to his present assignment, J
Manager of division con-j struction j
Mr. Henry was vice-president and manager of division construction for Bechtel's d                               Los Angeles Power Division where he Q                                 was responsible for foreign and domestic
6 months:
    /                             construction activities. Previously, 4                                 Mr. Henry was manager of construction for projects in the southwestern United
Deputy manager of division construction 9
  ]j' States and Southern California and, later, deputy manager of division construction.
1-1/2 years:
q                               As a construction manager in the Los q                         ,-  Angeles Power Division, Mr. Henry was
Manager of construction 5 years:
;. ;                              responsible for work on the Mohave, Rancho Seco, and San Onofre units.
Construction manager 1-1/2 years:
General superintendent 2-1/2 years:
Project superintendent 6 months:
Assistant superintendent j
2 years:
Senior field engineer 3 years:
Field engineer i
1 year:
Design engineer i
2 years:
Heavy equipment supervisor i
4 years:
Equipment operator 1
EXPERIENCE Currently, Mr. Henry is vice-president 1
and deputy general manager of the l
Ann Arbor Power Division.
Prior to his present assignment, a
J Mr. Henry was vice-president and manager of division construction for Bechtel's d
Los Angeles Power Division where he Q
was responsible for foreign and domestic
/
construction activities. Previously, 4
Mr. Henry was manager of construction for projects in the southwestern United
]j States and Southern California and, later, deputy manager of division construction.
q As a construction manager in the Los q
Angeles Power Division, Mr. Henry was responsible for work on the Mohave, Rancho Seco, and San Onofre units.
I i
I i


a i.'
ai.'
  -).
-).
t 6, .
t 6,.
x WILLIAM (BILL) GERALD HENRY (Cont'd) j     '#
WILLIAM (BILL) GERALD HENRY (Cont'd) x j
Mr. Henry has had considerable field
Mr. Henry has had considerable field experience since joining Bechtel in 1957 as a design engineer.
:                              experience since joining Bechtel in 1957 as a design engineer. Beginning i
Beginning in 1958, he' worked as a field engineer i
in 1958, he' worked as a field engineer on the Mammoth Pool hydropower plant i                             in the. Sierra and the Alamitos Steam
on the Mammoth Pool hydropower plant i
        }                             Station gas turbine units.                 In 1963, l                               he became assistant superintendent on-
in the. Sierra and the Alamitos Steam
      ;                                the Etiwanda power plant project. From 1964 to 1967 Mr. Henry was project superintendent for Redondo Units 7 and 8, and in 1967 he was named general superintendent on the Mohave Generating Station.       For the next three years Mr. Henry served as construction manager                         ,
}
respo'nsible for Mohave 1 and 2 and Four                         ;
Station gas turbine units.
Corners 4 and 5.
In 1963, l
5     g                               Prior to joining Bechtel in 1957,
he became assistant superintendent on-the Etiwanda power plant project.
  .?
From 1964 to 1967 Mr. Henry was project superintendent for Redondo Units 7 and 8, and in 1967 he was named general superintendent on the Mohave Generating Station.
For the next three years Mr. Henry served as construction manager respo'nsible for Mohave 1 and 2 and Four Corners 4 and 5.
5 g
Prior to joining Bechtel in 1957,
.?
Mr. Henry was a heavy equipment
Mr. Henry was a heavy equipment
  ]1                                  supervisor for the Army Corps of Engineers and an equipment operator for Henry Brothers Construction
]
                'N                   Company and the State Highway Department.
supervisor for the Army Corps of 1
            'v 4
Engineers and an equipment operator for Henry Brothers Construction
4-t i
'N Company and the State Highway Department.
  =l i
'v 4
4-i t
=l i
i (3
i (3
CJ i
CJ i


l i
l i
    )
)
1,. m
1,. m f
    <    f
(
(
l     1 l
l 1
l l
1 i
i 1 t 1 1 l
l 0
l 1
' I!k
,},
0 1
! 1 i
l l
l l
1                                                        :
l a
i i
l l 4
1 t 1 1 l
l   0 l1
' I
!k 0
1
  ,},
!1          i l   l l  a ll 4
5 Appendix C - Nuclear Experience 6
5 Appendix C - Nuclear Experience 6
i l
i l
e l l .
e l l l
l I           .
I I
I 4
4 lT l
lT l
i
i
  )
)
t k
t k
I.
I.
1 i
1
( .
(.
i v
i 6
i 6
v 3
3


      't 4
't 4
  . I, .                         BECHTEL NUCLEAR EXPERIENCE I
. I,.
BECHTEL NUCLEAR EXPERIENCE I
1 This section describes Bechtel's capabilities and experience I
1 This section describes Bechtel's capabilities and experience I
as the leader in providing engineering and construction ser-i         vices to the nuclear industry.
as the leader in providing engineering and construction ser-i vices to the nuclear industry.
BECHTEL QUALIFICATIONS AND RECORD IN NUCLEAR POWER I
BECHTEL QUALIFICATIONS AND RECORD IN NUCLEAR POWER I
e  30 YEARS OF NUCLEAR POWER EXPERIENCE o    91 NUCLEAR PLANTS DESIGNED OR CONSTRUCTED
30 YEARS OF NUCLEAR POWER EXPERIENCE e
          . e
91 NUCLEAR PLANTS DESIGNED OR CONSTRUCTED o
  }                73 NUCLEAR PLANTS WITH BECHTEL AS CONSTRUCTION MANAGER /
}
CONSTRUCTOR e  TOTAL CAPACITY EXCEEDS 78,000 MEGAWATTS 1'           e RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT / CONSTRUCTION OF l             25% OF CURRENTLY OPERATING NUCLEAR UNITS 1         e SELECTED FOR THREE MILE ISLAND RESTORATION WORK f           e SELECTED FOR PROJECT COMPLETION OF 7 UNITS CURRENTLY IN t             PROGRESS l           e LEADER IN DEVELOPING AND APPLYING EFFECTIVE PROJECT CONTROL t             TOOLS FOR NUCLEAR PROJECTS f
73 NUCLEAR PLANTS WITH BECHTEL AS CONSTRUCTION MANAGER /
e CONSTRUCTOR TOTAL CAPACITY EXCEEDS 78,000 MEGAWATTS e
1' RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT / CONSTRUCTION OF e
l 25% OF CURRENTLY OPERATING NUCLEAR UNITS 1
SELECTED FOR THREE MILE ISLAND RESTORATION WORK e
f SELECTED FOR PROJECT COMPLETION OF 7 UNITS CURRENTLY IN e
t PROGRESS l
LEADER IN DEVELOPING AND APPLYING EFFECTIVE PROJECT CONTROL e
t TOOLS FOR NUCLEAR PROJECTS f
i
i
            ~
~
1                               -        -
1 4
4 1
1 t
t t
t
}
}
4 1
4 1
4
4


        .                          General Nuclear Experience Bechtel has been a pioneer in the nuclear power field:
General Nuclear Experience Bechtel has been a pioneer in the nuclear power field:
4 first was the nuclear accelerator at Los Alamos, New Mexico, then came Arco, proving that power-generating atomic heat could be produced, controlled, and used. In the following year, the company performed the engineering for the Mark I and Mark II Materials Testing Accelerator Project in Livermore, California.
first 4
Next, it constructed the $20 million AEC Chemical Fuel Processing t             Plant in Idaho.
was the nuclear accelerator at Los Alamos, New Mexico, then came Arco, proving that power-generating atomic heat could be produced, controlled, and used.
I Bechtel provided construction management and engineering for
In the following year, the company performed the engineering for the Mark I and Mark II Materials Testing Accelerator Project in Livermore, California.
$              the installation of a turbine generator at General Electric 3
Next, it constructed the $20 million AEC Chemical Fuel Processing t
Company's Knolls' Atomic Laboratory in West Milton, New York.
Plant in Idaho.
This installation, utilizing byproduct energy from the proto-type reactor for the U.S. Navy submarine Sea Wolf, supplied the first nuclear-fueled power for commercial use in 1955.
I Bechtel provided construction management and engineering for the installation of a turbine generator at General Electric Company's Knolls' Atomic Laboratory in West Milton, New York.
v Also for General Electric, near Pleasanton, California, Bechtel f;            had complete responsibilities from engineering   through construc-2               tion of the Vallecitos Atomic Laboratory. Vallecitos, as an j             experimental facility, made its greatest contribution by demon-
3 This installation, utilizing byproduct energy from the proto-type reactor for the U.S. Navy submarine Sea Wolf, supplied the first nuclear-fueled power for commercial use in 1955.
{'
v f
Also for General Electric, near Pleasanton, California, Bechtel had complete responsibilities from engineering through construc-2 tion of the Vallecitos Atomic Laboratory.
Vallecitos, as an j
experimental facility, made its greatest contribution by demon-
{
strating increasing efficiency and output, and thus reducing cost of nuclear power.
strating increasing efficiency and output, and thus reducing cost of nuclear power.
4 i             A milestone in Bechtel's growth with the nuclear industry came j
4 i
in 1959 with completion of the Commonwealth Edison Company's Dresden Nuclear Power Station in Morris, Illinois. This was j             the country's first large, privately financed nuclear power i           plant. Bechtel was engineer-constructor, responsible for all construction and design, except for the nuclear package.
A milestone in Bechtel's growth with the nuclear industry came in 1959 with completion of the Commonwealth Edison Company's j
Dresden Nuclear Power Station in Morris, Illinois.
This was j
the country's first large, privately financed nuclear power i
plant.
Bechtel was engineer-constructor, responsible for all construction and design, except for the nuclear package.
l I
l I
j             Through these, and other projects, Bechtel has maintained its g                position within this rapidly evolving industry with participa-1 tion in many advanced projects involving studies, evaluations, 4
j Through these, and other projects, Bechtel has maintained its position within this rapidly evolving industry with participa-g tion in many advanced projects involving studies, evaluations, 1
engineering, and construction milestones. Some highlights of o
4 engineering, and construction milestones.
l            these activities are:
Some highlights of l
i i            e  Comprehensive design and construction services for first
these activities are:
              -      nuclear addition to a conventional steam plant, Humboldt
o i
  .                Bay 3.
Comprehensive design and construction services for first i
'8                e  Engineering' services for the first nuclear power unit with a pressure suppression containment - APPR-lA.
e nuclear addition to a conventional steam plant, Humboldt Bay 3.
4 e  Development and construction of the first fully prestressed, i
Engineering' services for the first nuclear power unit with
'8 e
a pressure suppression containment - APPR-lA.
4 Development and construction of the first fully prestressed, e
post-tensioned concrete containment vessel - Palisades 1.
post-tensioned concrete containment vessel - Palisades 1.
o  Comprehensive design and construction services for the first
i Comprehensive design and construction services for the first o
      '              nuclear power plant with a field fabricated reactor vessel -
nuclear power plant with a field fabricated reactor vessel -
Monticello 1.
Monticello 1.
J Engineering, procurement and construction of Tarapur,   India's g                 e first commercial nuclear power plant. This required extensive
J India's Engineering, procurement and construction of Tarapur, e
[              training of workers and close supervision of local subcontractors.
g
j g
[
a
first commercial nuclear power plant.
This required extensive j
training of workers and close supervision of local subcontractors.
g a


k*     O   High T2mparctura Gac Cooled Raactor Plant Studies and j         Designs.
k*
i e  Standardized Nuclear Unit Power Plant System.
O High T2mparctura Gac Cooled Raactor Plant Studies and j
e s
Designs.
o  Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor Program, Fast Flux Test Facility Engineering and Construction.
i Standardized Nuclear Unit Power Plant System.
      ;    o   Engineering and Construction of San Onofre Units 2 and 3
e e
      ,        with seismic design criteria of 0.66G, one of the world's highest.
Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor Program, Fast Flux Test s
  )       Bechtel has experience with nearly all types of reactor design and power concepts. Bechtel is not associated permanently with d,     any manufacturer or agency but works with all major worldwide l       suppliers of nuclear steam supply systems and turbine generators.
o Facility Engineering and Construction.
f Today, in its third decade of service to the nuclear industry, Bechtel has participated in the design engineering and/or con-struction of 91 major nuclear plants in the United States and d         worldwide. The total capacity of these projects is in excess of 78,000 megawatts.
o Engineering and Construction of San Onofre Units 2 and 3 with seismic design criteria of 0.66G, one of the world's highest.
j i     '4any technical and economic studies, safety analyses, licensing preparations anci presentations for state of the art and advanced fission and fusion nuclear power plants, and the nuclear fuel
)
  ;        cycle from mining to waste storage have been performed and j     completed. For example, a study was completed concerning the
Bechtel has experience with nearly all types of reactor design and power concepts.
:;        licensability in the United States of the French Phenix, fast a         breeder ~ reactor. Other studies have covered spent fuel pool h       expansions, temporary and permanent waste storage, and recovery of Three Mile Island Unit 2.
Bechtel is not associated permanently with d,
any manufacturer or agency but works with all major worldwide l
suppliers of nuclear steam supply systems and turbine generators.
f Today, in its third decade of service to the nuclear industry, Bechtel has participated in the design engineering and/or con-struction of 91 major nuclear plants in the United States and d
worldwide.
The total capacity of these projects is in excess of 78,000 megawatts.
j i
'4any technical and economic studies, safety analyses, licensing preparations anci presentations for state of the art and advanced fission and fusion nuclear power plants, and the nuclear fuel cycle from mining to waste storage have been performed and j
completed.
For example, a study was completed concerning the licensability in the United States of the French Phenix, fast a
breeder ~ reactor.
Other studies have covered spent fuel pool h
expansions, temporary and permanent waste storage, and recovery of Three Mile Island Unit 2.
i 3
i 3
I 1                       -
I 1
a J
a J
t tk
t tk


.                    Nuclear Plant Construction Management / Construction Experience Bechtel's nuclear plant construction experience dates back to 1950. Since then Bechtel has been responsible for the construc-tion of 73 nuclear units. Our involvement has ranged from projects when we were the construction manager only with all work being performed by contractors to assignments where virtually all of the work was performed directly by Bechtel.
Nuclear Plant Construction Management / Construction Experience Bechtel's nuclear plant construction experience dates back to 1950.
Most projects included a combination of the above. Substantial work is performed by Bechtel forces (+ 60%). The remaining         '
Since then Bechtel has been responsible for the construc-tion of 73 nuclear units.
work is performed by specialty contractors with Bechtel pro-viding construction management services. This combination _
Our involvement has ranged from projects when we were the construction manager only with all work being performed by contractors to assignments where virtually all of the work was performed directly by Bechtel.
of experience makes Bechtel uniquely qualified in that our field engineers and supervisors have acquired a breadth of understanding of both managing as well as directly performing the work.                                            .
Most projects included a combination of the above.
Substantial work is performed by Bechtel forces
(+ 60%).
The remaining work is performed by specialty contractors with Bechtel pro-viding construction management services.
This combination _
of experience makes Bechtel uniquely qualified in that our field engineers and supervisors have acquired a breadth of understanding of both managing as well as directly performing the work.
The following table taken from Kidder, Peabody & Company's March 30, 1982 " Status Report on Engineers and Construction Managers for Electric Utility Nuclear Reactorc'and Fossil Boilers (as of 12/31/81) ", depicts Bechtel's preeminence as a Construction Manager for domestic nuclear power plants.
The following table taken from Kidder, Peabody & Company's March 30, 1982 " Status Report on Engineers and Construction Managers for Electric Utility Nuclear Reactorc'and Fossil Boilers (as of 12/31/81) ", depicts Bechtel's preeminence as a Construction Manager for domestic nuclear power plants.
m 4
m 4
Line 976: Line 1,403:
s
s


_ . . ._          ---_.,u..-,~~~.-_.----._x                           .
---_.,u..-,~~~.-_.----._x
_ - - . -                - - - ~ . _         .        -. . - . , - _ . -
- - - ~. _
Engineers and Construction Managers Summary - Construction Managers, Nuc1 car Reactors, Domestic Operating         \
Engineers and Construction Managers Summary - Construction Managers, Nuc1 car Reactors, Domestic Operating
* To Be Operated                         Total Manager                   #        MWE     %          #            MWE     %                  #    MWE               %
\\
American El Pr Service Co               2     2,120     3                                                   2   2,120                 1 Baldwin                                                             2           1,866     2                 2   1,866                 1 Bechtel                               25     18,813   27         20           22,429   26                 45   41,242   4       26 Brown & Root                           2     1,642     2         2           2,300     3                 4   3,942         ,' 3                       ;s Burns & Roe                             3     1,508     2,                                                 3   1,508                 1 C. F. Braun                             1       644     1                                                   1       644 Commonwealth Edison                     2     2,100     3         8           8,936   10                 10' 11,036                 7             .
To Be Operated Total Manager MWE MWE MWE American El Pr Service Co 2
Consolidated Ed NY                     1         265         -
2,120 3
1      265                         ,
2 2,120 1
6,093 Daniel                       .        5     4,608     7         6                     7               11   10,701               -7 Duke Power                             7     7,678   11           6           7,310     8               13   14,988               10 Ebasco                                 6     4,238     6         6           6,796     8             -12   11,034                 7 Georgia Power                           2     1,581     2         2           2,220     3                 4   3,801                 2 Gibbs & Hill                           1       457     1                                                   1       4'57 J.A. Jones                             1       825     1                                                   1       825               1           ,
Baldwin 2
Kaiser Engineers                       1       850     1         1             810     1                 2   1,660                 1 Miscellaneous                           1         52                                                         1       52 Northern States Pr                     2     1,060     2                                                   2   1,060                 1 Pacific Cas & El                                                     2           2,190     3                 2   2,190                 1 Pub Serv Indiana                                                     2           2,260     3                 2   2,260                 1 Pub Serv Oklahoma                       2     2,300     3                                                   2   2,300                 1 Stone & Webster                         7     4,854     7         5           4,458     5               12   ),312                 6 Tenn Valley Auth                       4     4,345     6       13           15,896   18                 17   20,241             13 United Engineers & Const               8     7,148   10           2           2,300     3               10   9,448                 6 Virginia E1 & Pr                                                     1             938                       1       938               1 Westinghouse                           2 1,838     3                                                   2   1,838                 3 Wisconsin Pub Serv                     1       541     2                                                   1       541 l
1,866 2
l Total                             86     69,467   100         78           86,802 100               164   156,269         100 l
2 1,866 1
Bechtel 25 18,813 27 20 22,429 26 45 41,242 4
26 Brown & Root 2
1,642 2
2 2,300 3
4 3,942
,' 3
;s Burns & Roe 3
1,508 2,
3 1,508 1
C. F. Braun 1
644 1
1 644 Commonwealth Edison 2
2,100 3
8 8,936 10 10' 11,036 7
Consolidated Ed NY 1
265 1
265 Daniel 5
4,608 7
6 6,093 7
11 10,701
-7 Duke Power 7
7,678 11 6
7,310 8
13 14,988 10 Ebasco 6
4,238 6
6 6,796 8
-12 11,034 7
Georgia Power 2
1,581 2
2 2,220 3
4 3,801 2
Gibbs & Hill 1
457 1
1 4'57 J.A. Jones 1
825 1
1 825 1
Kaiser Engineers 1
850 1
1 810 1
2 1,660 1
Miscellaneous 1
52 1
52 Northern States Pr 2
1,060 2
2 1,060 1
Pacific Cas & El 2
2,190 3
2 2,190 1
Pub Serv Indiana 2
2,260 3
2 2,260 1
Pub Serv Oklahoma 2
2,300 3
2 2,300 1
Stone & Webster 7
4,854 7
5 4,458 5
12
),312 6
Tenn Valley Auth 4
4,345 6
13 15,896 18 17 20,241 13 United Engineers & Const 8
7,148 10 2
2,300 3
10 9,448 6
Virginia E1 & Pr 1
938 1
938 1
Westinghouse 2
1,838 3
2 1,838 3
Wisconsin Pub Serv 1
541 2
1 541 l
l Total 86 69,467 100 78 86,802 100 164 156,269 100 l
1 0
1 0


    ?
?
      -  ~~x                  Nuclear Plant Project Completion Services Experience j   x Owner             Unit                 Services j           Washington         WNP - 1           Project management Public Power                         Construction management Supply System WNP - 2           Project management l                                                   Construction management il WNP - 4*           Project management
Nuclear Plant Project Completion
  )I                                                    Construction management South Texas       South Texas-1     Project management
~~x Services Experience j
            ~
x Owner Unit Services j
Project                              Engineering Procurement Construction management 9
Washington WNP - 1 Project management Public Power Construction management Supply System WNP - 2 Project management l
i                                 South Texas-2     Project management Engineering
Construction management il
  ,                                                    Procurement Construction management 4
)I WNP - 4*
    ,;            Pacific Gas &     Diablo Canyon 1   Project management
Project management Construction management South Texas South Texas-1 Project management Project
  +
~
j              Electric                              Engineering i                                                   Construction management j
Engineering Procurement Construction management 9
    ;                                Diablo Canyon 2   Project management Engineering j                                                   Construction management
i South Texas-2 Project management Engineering Procurement Construction management 4
    .f           Detroit Edison     Fermi 2           Ccnstruction (punch listing)
Pacific Gas &
Company                               Startup       "
Diablo Canyon 1 Project management j
:]i                                                   Maintenance 1
Electric Engineering
+
i Construction management j
Diablo Canyon 2 Project management Engineering j
Construction management
.f Detroit Edison Fermi 2 Ccnstruction (punch listing)
Company Startup
:]i Maintenance 1
V s
V s
* Unit later cancelled.
* Unit later cancelled.
s                             .          .
s i
i I
I


a
f.g a
                                          .g    s   f.g
s
        .                                    ;i           b'-                                                                            BECHTEL*S g                             i     y*                                                                                   NUCLEAR PCWER PLANT                     .
.g
      !        g EX P ^- ~ l E N C E i,                                   Q d                                   ~       ^
;i b
BECHTEL*S g
i y*
NUCLEAR PCWER PLANT g
EX P ^- ~ l E N C E i,
Q d
~
^
N = " ~ ~~~ :
N = " ~ ~~~ :
PILGRIM 4                                               Commercial                                                       Reactor Operation                                                     Supplier     Gross   Bechtel       Start             Start
PILGRIM 4
    ]                                                                                                                              MW      Scope      Engineering Construction Client               Lect. tion   & Type j                                                  Date-Unit 1988 Iberduero,$. A.             Spain       Westinghouse   1100     ME             1975             1977 Sayago l.
Commercial Reactor
I                                                                                                     PWR l         -
]
1                                       1987 Korea Electric Co.           Korea       Westinghouse     950     EPMC           1979             1980 Korea Cucl ear 8
Operation Supplier Gross Bechtel Start Start j
  .f         g3                                                                                                     P/lR j
Date-Unit Client Lect. tion
J                                Ta wan 7                   Taipower                     Taiwan             -          -    Prelim E       1979               -
& Type MW Scope Engineering Construction 1988 Sayago Iberduero,$. A.
Taipower                     Taiwan             -          -    Prelim E         1979             -
Spain Westinghouse 1100 ME 1975 1977 l
i                                          Taiwan 8
I PWR l
(                                          Hope Creek 2               New Jersey Public           New Jersey   GE - BWR     1100     EPC             1974           1974 j       ,
1 1987 Korea Cucl ear 8 Korea Electric Co.
Korea Westinghouse 950 EPMC 1979 1980
.f g3 P/lR J
j Ta wan 7 Taipower Taiwan Prelim E 1979 i
Taiwan 8 Taipower Taiwan Prelim E 1979
(
Hope Creek 2 New Jersey Public New Jersey GE - BWR 1100 EPC 1974 1974 j
Service E & G 3
Service E & G 3
Missouri      Westinghouse  1150      EP              1973            1976 Ca!!away 2                 Union Electric
{
{                                                                                                                PWR Boston Edison               Mass.         CE - PWR     1223     EPC             1972           ISED
Ca!!away 2 Union Electric Missouri Westinghouse 1150 EP 1973 1976 PWR Pdgrim 2 Boston Edison Mass.
    ;                                          Pdgrim 2 Georgia Power               Georgia       Westinghouse 1100       EP             1971           1M4 j                                          Vogtte 2 1                                                                     Southern Services                         PWR f                                       1936 I                                                                                                   Korea        Westinghouse    950      EPMC          1979            1980 Korea Nactear 7           Korer. Electric Co.
CE - PWR 1223 EPC 1972 ISED j
PWR l                                                                                                                               1100                      1977            ISEO Tsuruga                     Mitsubishi                 Japan         Mitsubishi/             E g                                                                                                                 Westinghouse PWR Spain         Westinghouse   1100     ME             1976           1977 Vande:los 11                ENHER f                                                                                                                 WIR j                                           -
Vogtte 2 Georgia Power Georgia Westinghouse 1100 EP 1971 1M4 1
1300      EFC            1975            1976 Palo Verde 3               Arizona Public Service     Arizona       CE - PWR l
Southern Services PWR f
* Washington   B & W/W PWR   1218     MC             1972           1973 l                                           Washingten Nuclear Power 4 WPPSS 1985 Korea        Westinghouse    950      EPMC          1978            1980 f                                           Korea Nuclear 6           Korea Electric Co.
1936 I
PilR
Korea Nactear 7 Korer. Electric Co.
  )                                                                                                                                                                         1974
Korea Westinghouse 950 EPMC 1979 1980 PWR l
  '                                            Hope Creek 1               New Jersey Public           New Jersey   GE - BWR       1100     EPC           1974 j                                                                       Service E & G Italy       Westinghouse   950     MEC           1974           De'ayed
Tsuruga Mitsubishi Japan Mitsubishi/
  )                                            EnelV                      Electrenucleare Italiana PWR
1100 E
  ]f]
1977 ISEO g
Washington Nuclear Power   Washington Public Power Supply System Washington   B & W/W PWR   1218     MC             1972           1973 1974 Mississippi GE - BWR       1301       EPC           1971
Westinghouse PWR Vande:los 11 ENHER Spain Westinghouse 1100 ME 1976 1977 f
          *              '                    Grand Gulf Nuclear 2       Mississippi Power and Light Pennsylvania G E - SWR     1088       EPC           1969           1974 Limerick 2                Philadelphia Electric E- ENGINEERING P-PROCUREMENT C- CONSTRUCTION M-MANAGEMENT
WIR j
l Palo Verde 3 Arizona Public Service Arizona CE - PWR 1300 EFC 1975 1976 Washington B & W/W PWR 1218 MC 1972 1973 l
Washingten Nuclear Power 4 WPPSS 1985 f
Korea Nuclear 6 Korea Electric Co.
Korea Westinghouse 950 EPMC 1978 1980 PilR
)'
Hope Creek 1 New Jersey Public New Jersey GE - BWR 1100 EPC 1974 1974 j
Service E & G
)
EnelV Electrenucleare Italiana Italy Westinghouse 950 MEC 1974 De'ayed PWR
]f]
Washington Nuclear Power Washington Public Power Washington B & W/W PWR 1218 MC 1972 1973 Supply System Grand Gulf Nuclear 2 Mississippi Power and Light Mississippi GE - BWR 1301 EPC 1971 1974 Limerick 2 Philadelphia Electric Pennsylvania G E - SWR 1088 EPC 1969 1974 E-ENGINEERING P-PROCUREMENT C-CONSTRUCTION M-MANAGEMENT


3 K
3 K
            -Ett h _                                             r:rg                     c L4         9
]f
    ]f U T"M                              "                                  ,jgIh 5 % s --- ,
-Ett h _
g
r:rg c L4 9
                                                    %     3
,jgIh 5 % s ---,
                                                              %       Q       4.       b>
% % Q 4. b y N T4 F " [w ? Q F U T"M 3
py    N T4 e    ma.,gqw F " [w ? Q                         F i  '
p e ma.,gqw g
                        .J...ge::S         :.*p, M        S5Wn:
...ge::S :.*p, S5Wn:
tL Q                    % k . ? 1.k r ATy V }QV4
i 7' MIN N &W 2?j? W
: s. ..
% k. ? 1.k r ATy tL Q V }QV4 ~-
                        .m%. ,, .>
M
                                          ~-
.J
                                        -w-
: q t c.. 5...m t-u m.,.. #~,.+.m. _
                                    .z,._-
7'g-MIN N      m.&W
: q t c.. 5...m 2.:.u.
s
s
                                                                          ; 2?j? W sm,
.s g-m.
                                                                                  .r t-u m.,.. nm#~,.+.m.
sm,
                                                                                                < . ew._..w..,.~w _,.
-w-
s
. s..m%.,,.>.z,._-
                                                                                                                                      .s y
.r s
m mun.ue.                                                                                                               _
2.:.u. nm <
KUOSHENG d
. ew...w..,.~w _,.
C                                                                                       Reactor Commercial                                                                               Bechtel   Start           Start Sapplier      Gross Operation                                                                               Scope    Engineering  Construction Location        & Type        MW Date-Unit                 Client -
m mun.ue.
L h         1984 1978          1930 Korea          Westinghotse    950      EF t.tC Korea Nuclear 5           Korea Electric Co.
y KUOSHENG d
1                                                                                   PWR h                                                                                     Westinghouse     950     EPMC       1573           1978 Taiwan Power                  Taiwan Maanshan 2 PWR a
C Reactor Commercial Sapplier Gross Bechtel Start Start Operation Date-Unit Client -
CE - PWR       1303     EPC       1973           1976 Arizona Pub'ic Service        Arizona Palo Verde 2 a
Location
1300      EPMC      1973        Defayed Puget Sound Power             Washmgton     GE - BWR Skagit Nuclear 1
& Type MW Scope Engineering Construction L
    .c                                      and Light
h 1984 Korea Nuclear 5 Korea Electric Co.
    ,j                                                                     Georgia       Westmshouse     1100     EP         1971         1974 Georgia Power fj            Vogtle 1 Southern Services PWR 14                                                                                                       460      EPC        1968          1972 N                                        Consumers Power               Michigan     B & W PWR Midland 1 r.
Korea Westinghotse 950 EF t.tC 1978 1930 1
PWR h
Maanshan 2 Taiwan Power Taiwan Westinghouse 950 EPMC 1573 1978 PWR a
Palo Verde 2 Arizona Pub'ic Service Arizona CE - PWR 1303 EPC 1973 1976 Skagit Nuclear 1 Puget Sound Power Washmgton GE - BWR 1300 EPMC 1973 Defayed a
and Light
.c,j fj Vogtle 1 Georgia Power Georgia Westmshouse 1100 EP 1971 1974 Southern Services PWR 14 Midland 1 Consumers Power Michigan B & W PWR 460 EPC 1968 1972 N
r.
{
1933
1933
{                                                                    Taiwan        Westmghouse        950    EPMC      1976          1978 Maanshan 1                Taiwan Power
(
(
* PSR Westinghouse    1150      EP        1973          1977 Kansas City P & L             Missouri Wolf Creek lf                                                                                    PWR 4                                                                                    Westinghouse     930     FCM         1973         1974 FECSA                          Spain                                  ~
Maanshan 1 Taiwan Power Taiwan Westmghouse 950 EPMC 1976 1978 PSR lf Wolf Creek Kansas City P & L Missouri Westinghouse 1150 EP 1973 1977 PWR M
M              ASCO 2 PWR i.s                                                                      Arizona       CE - PWR         1300     EPC         1973         1976 PMo Verde 1               Arizona Public Service 1                                                                                                       1260      EMC        1972        Delayed Port!and General Electric     Oregon         B & W PWR
ASCO 2 FECSA Spain Westinghouse 930 FCM 1973 1974 4
      ;            Pebble Springs 1 Westinghouse     930     E         1972           1974 lberduero                    Spain Lemoni: 2                                                              PWR 3
~
* 1095      EPC        1970          1374 Fennsylvania Power             Pennsylvania GE -BWR Susquehanna 2
PWR i
(                                       . & Light           .
PMo Verde 1 Arizona Public Service Arizona CE - PWR 1300 EPC 1973 1976
3 Penasylvania GE - BWR         1088     EPC       1969           G74 Limerick 1                Philadelphia Electric
.s 1
  ,$                                                                                                        812    EPC        1965          1972 Consumers Power               Michigan       B & W PWR 0              Midland 2 5     -
Pebble Springs 1 Port!and General Electric Oregon B & W PWR 1260 EMC 1972 Delayed Lemoni: 2 lberduero Spain Westinghouse 930 E
1932 EP          1973          1976 Missouri      Westinghouse    1150 Callaway 1                 Union Electric PWR 1000    EPMC        1972          1975 Taman Power                   Taiwan         GE - BWR Kuosheng 2 y                                                                                                        1301    EPC        1971          1974 Mississip;i Power and Light   Mississippi   GE - BWR j               Grand Gulf Nuclear 1 Pennsylvania GE - BWR           1035     EPC       1970           1574 Pennsylvaria Power jJ              Susquehanna 1
1972 1974 3
                                              & Light f
PWR Susquehanna 2 Fennsylvania Power Pennsylvania GE -BWR 1095 EPC 1970 1374
  ;i 4
(
. & Light Limerick 1 Philadelphia Electric Penasylvania GE - BWR 1088 EPC 1969 G74 3
0 Midland 2 Consumers Power Michigan B & W PWR 812 EPC 1965 1972 5
1932 Callaway 1 Union Electric Missouri Westinghouse 1150 EP 1973 1976 PWR Kuosheng 2 Taman Power Taiwan GE - BWR 1000 EPMC 1972 1975 j
Grand Gulf Nuclear 1 Mississip;i Power and Light Mississippi GE - BWR 1301 EPC 1971 1974 y
j Susquehanna 1 Pennsylvaria Power Pennsylvania GE - BWR 1035 EPC 1970 1574
& Light J
f
;i 4
E - ENGINEERiflG P - PROCUREMENT C - CCNSTRUCTION M - MANAGEMENT
E - ENGINEERiflG P - PROCUREMENT C - CCNSTRUCTION M - MANAGEMENT


F7 ','      '
F7 ','
                                                          '45c.fN)/f*y.:.L
'45c.fN)/f*y.:.L
                                                            ?c7                 nmo:
?c7 nmo
* W 1;;ct.y . cd5.*c%
!j.+W';7.y. cd5.*c%
                                                            !j.+W';7.y.
W 1;;ct.y.
N 3 $&a=f0!   v
$&a=f0!
: k. .%t ?
N
                                                                                .F m
.F m 3
                                                                                .fn.:,6. ~
v
g WM
: k..%t.fn.:,6. ~
? g WM
- m ?s h 9 m?j'MT&@e*x
* es
* es
                                                  .. yR $.'                                           f - m ?s
$.' %sm$a1
                                                                                                % &, p*e}i:V.'tSA             h  9
&, p*e}i:V.'tSA &d'kl', {
                                                                                                                            &d'kl',   { m?j'MT&@e*x
i
:                                                                                                                                                              . ~L
' i ': *.
                                                                          %sm$a1 21,p i      ' i ': *.
. ~L hhIif$hh4dthb$$nk$h..h.g{F-f 21,p
                                                                                                                                        .tt M5 2
.t M5 F.' f.g
                                    ,~ m Y ,y,l n                                                                            '
.. yR
F.' f.g
: b. l[#,CW by.9,ei(1.D @ f.liIk % @f [ ' $ E-A--
  ! {}1      2
! {}1 n
: b. l[#,CW   h. by.9,ei(1.D @ f.liIk % @f [ ' $ E-A--
,~ m Y,y,l g
u ..
t 2
g hhIif$hh4dthb$$nk$h.                                                                                                   .h.g{F-$
2 h.
f1]                         N:'N'                 iN    .                              ik YY 5b?t                         Y_Y d                           YE       ~
u..
TROJAN l
f1]
                          ~
N:'N' i N ik YY 5b?t Y_Y d YE
Reactor
~
* Commercial                                                                   Supplier   Gross     Bechtel     Start         Start Operation                                                                               MW         Scope     Enginearing Construction Client              Location        & Type Date-Unit
l TROJAN
]
~
J1 U
Reactor Commercial Supplier Gross Bechtel Start Start Operation Date-Unit Client Location
1931                                                                                                                                         1975 GE - BWR     1000       EPMC         1972 Taiwan Power                      Taiwan Kuosheng 1 Westmghouse   930       E           1972         1974 Ittrduero                        Spain Lemeniz 1                                                                          PWR 4
& Type MW Scope Enginearing Construction
Westinghouse   930       ECM         1972         1974 5                                                               FECSA                            Spain y                         ASCO1                                                                              PWR
]
      }                                                                                               California   Comb. Eng. 1100         EPC         1970         1974 Southern California Edison 3                              San Onofre 2                                                                      PWR j             ,'N 2
U J1 1931 Kuosheng 1 Taiwan Power Taiwan GE - BWR 1000 EPMC 1972 1975 Lemeniz 1 Ittrduero Spain Westmghouse 930 E
?'.                   /    1980                                                                                                                                         1972 d                    -                                                                                            Comb. Eng.     930       EPC         1970 Arkansas Power & Light            Arkansas Arkansas Nuclear 1 1                                  Unit 2 PWR
1972 1974 PWR ASCO1 FECSA Spain Westinghouse 930 ECM 1972 1974 4
    ,(                                                                                                                             847          E          1970          1972 Alabama      Westinghouse Jcseph M. Farley 2                 Akbama Power &
5 y
s Southern Service PWR
PWR
~} WM                              FFTF                               WADC0 f or USAEC                 Washington   Westinghouse LMFBR 400         EPC       1968         1970
}
      ?j a
3 San Onofre 2 Southern California Edison California Comb. Eng.
                                                                                                                                                  ~
1100 EPC 1970 1974 PWR j
9a                    1979 822          E         1970          1971 Georgia Power &                 Georgia       G E - BWR E.1. Hatch 2 ff                                                                   Southern Service 3 g                           Forsmark                           ASEA-ATOM                       Sweden       ASEA-ATOM       900       Advisory     1370         1973 "3        de                                                                                                  BWR
,'N 2
      %j           .
?'.
1977 1969          1972
1980 1
  ]A                              Joseph M. Farley 1                   Alabama Power &                 Alabama     Westinghouse   847         E
Arkansas Nuclear 1 Arkansas Power & Light Arkansas Comb. Eng.
                                                                                                .                  PWR
930 EPC 1970 1972
                                                                      , Southern Service A                                                                                                                                  906          EMC      1989          1971
/
    "                                                                Toledo-Edison                   Ohio         B & W PWR Davis-Besse 1
d PWR
                .-                                                    Cleveland Electric Comb. Eng.     281         EPC       1967         1363 Baltimore Gas & Electric        Maryland 1                        Calvert Clifis 2
,(
      ''                                                                                                            PWR 3
Unit 2 s
i                 1975 1150          EMC        1963          1971 Oregon      Westinghouse Trojan t                             Fortland Gen. Electric PWR 4,.
Jcseph M. Farley 2 Akbama Power &
S57          EPC        1968          1970 Connecticut Light &             Connecticut Comb. Eng.
Alabama Westinghouse 847 E
Milestor'e Nuclear 2 (11      j Power Co.                                   PWR W                                                                       Hartford Electric Light Company West Massachusetts
1970 1972
~ 'd L                                                                     Electnc Company                     ,
~} M Southern Service PWR W
- il   ..
FFTF WADC0 f or USAEC Washington Westinghouse 400 EPC 1968 1970 LMFBR
                              ,      ,.,....~-.,,..c.:,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,0,.,.,,.,,..,,,,
?j a
1979
~
9 E.1. Hatch 2 Georgia Power &
Georgia G E - BWR 822 E
1970 1971 a
ff Southern Service 3 g "3
de Forsmark ASEA-ATOM Sweden ASEA-ATOM 900 Advisory 1370 1973 BWR
%j
]
1977 A
Joseph M. Farley 1 Alabama Power &
Alabama Westinghouse 847 E
1969 1972 PWR
, Southern Service Davis-Besse 1 Toledo-Edison Ohio B & W PWR 906 EMC 1989 1971 A
Cleveland Electric 1
Calvert Clifis 2 Baltimore Gas & Electric Maryland Comb. Eng.
281 EPC 1967 1363 PWR 3
i 1975 Trojan t Fortland Gen. Electric Oregon Westinghouse 1150 EMC 1963 1971 PWR 4,.
(11 Milestor'e Nuclear 2 Connecticut Light &
Connecticut Comb. Eng.
S57 EPC 1968 1970 j
Power Co.
PWR W
Hartford Electric Light Company West Massachusetts
~ 'd L
Electnc Company
- il
,.,....~-.,,..c.:,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,0,.,.,,.,,..,,,,


I
I
                                                                                                                        *4
*4 n:.yCM :ik
(
.,., '..' 'k'k' (b'
                                                                                      . , . , ' . .' 'k'k' b'         ~
~
n:.yCM :ik              - :-
l f Ih
l                                                                       '
.c a,.:ff %
f .c Ih m w .+;g .. . %
m w.+;g... %
a,.:ff % .cv.ya;t;,wy.i                               -
.cv.ya;t;,wy.i WM YN&~;?!5l
      +
+
WM                         YN&~;?!5l                                                                       a           -e,
a
                                                                                                                                    ..hh4 u , m. ;[ 5 S. $2-).N -r-\-
-e,
Y?,.
..hh u, m. ;[ 5 S. $2-).N -r-\\-
L                                                          ,:      1. .
4
g? :            ?iE4$).W%h'W.w
?iE4$).W%h'W.w ef. %.z. M;;
                                                                                              =7 ef.
;=-~ ~p-
                                                                                                                                ;=-~      %.z.
.:.(? % v..:.:. %
                                                                                                                                    ~ - - - -
l Y?,.
                                                                                                                                            ~p-w M;;
g? :
                                                                                                                                                          .:.(?
: 1..
: v. w L%   .,:v..
L
                                                                                                                                                                                              %        l E,   5,--.g:. L g    _
~ - - - -
: c. .-.                                         m. .,r, ,% ., h L          .
w E,
                                                          . a. ..w.
5,.g:. L
=7
: v. w L.,:..,.
m.
M:k nM:-3
M:k nM:-3
_,, w.4. --w$,t2d.. -                                            !: W e,cN,p;7.r
!: W e N.
                                                                                                                                                                          ''.'       M. .c                 .
.,r,,%., h
                                              .#                    ;t&                                                                                                                         Q.*t;<-'8 .A.ib~w%, .
. c.
w n. v. m. , - W.te.i., ew<                  s% .m 1,                                                                                                   z w~
,c,p;7.r ''.'
                                          ..                                                                                                                                                          r u; -
M..c g
                                                                                                                                                                                      < . w-a
. a...w. _,, w.. --w$,t2d.. -
                              .,v
L
    +
;t& 4 Q.*t;<-
15%:.yn      -            .
.A.ib~w%,.
k'.m%:                    M                  <
'8 15%:. -
{    ? * +4Ds       53' ;:n.w          . ~.         u.c,'
.,v w n. v. m., - W.te.i., s%.m 1, a ? * +4Ds. ~. u.c,'.., '>..Aw,:a
5      . ., '> . :.Aw,:a rr; -          Q}'
: Q}'
                        ..T.       C .d*sre:A _                                 , 7-%p.U;, M-            ./ -A                                                                  s        - p ~ -. ' m'" $.gp;*
r yn ew<
1                                                                          >
u; -
i
<. w-z w~
                                                                                                                              *f?. ,.,    HQ. _ c .m.g.:gw%f%re.,5M,.j,9
, 7-%p.U;./ -A
                            &WW  p%    mwia. w y W.. 4 :: n% @ Q-=-f2:                                    -Q
{
                          ...x                                                                                                                             . .x . m s                                                                            -          -
53' 5
t                                                                                          n v;
.T. C.d*sre:A _ k'.m%:
m;e--4 ~.                                                    2?r&< M                    M                      %        3
M
                  .,+-;              n 's&&.;e"2%,3'"s%'g@-e y%%yq;x,-W.>N.                                             7M:i:   .            ICV-8'T                                 ' ~ ** ;:G'-4.i-w*%.;5.'::':s5-p47@N iMeish.S;/2                                   w.'s       w    a Am.w
+
                                                                                                                            ~ '
.,., _ c...x. m
* M-                                                                           -
- p ~ -. ' m'" $ p;
d kyJ        i.W%t-;9.T
;:n.w rr; -
    .i                                                                                                                               .
. & p % w w y 4 :: n%@ Q-=-f2:
i                               _
, M- - Q
POINT BEACH I
*f? HQ. m.g.:gw%f%re.,5M,.j,9.g
i                                                                                                                                      Reactor           )
* 1 i
  )                               Comrnercial                                                                                             Supolier             Gross           Bechtel       Start           Start Operatio n                                                                                                                     f.*//           Scepe     Engineering   Construction
s s
  }                                                                          Client                                Location              & Type
...x m ia. W..
    .                              Date-U nit
WW
. y%%yq;x,-W.>N. 7M:i: ICV-8'T iMeish.S;/2 w.'s w a Am.w t
' ~ ** ;:G'-4.i-w*%.;5.'::':s5-p47@N n
m;e--4 ~.
2?r&< M n 's&&.;e"2%,3'"s%'g@-e.
M 3
v;
~ '
* M-
,+-; i.W%t-;9.T d
.i kyJ POINT BEACH i
I i
Reactor
)
)
Comrnercial Supolier Gross Bechtel Start Start
}
Operatio n Date-U nit Client Location
& Type f.*//
Scepe Engineering Construction
-l
-l
(             1975 813              E             1967          1969 l                                                            Georgta Pcwer &                                 Georgia             GE - BWR E.1. Hatch 1
(
[                                                            Southern Service
1975
  .'                                                                                                                                Cornb. Eng.                   834             EPC           1967         1969 i                                                           Baltimere Gas & Electric                        Maryland
[
    ;                    Calvert Chtfs 1                                                                                            PWR 1                                                                                                                                                                                                           1963 B&WPWR                       950             EPMC         1967 Sacramento Municipal                          Ca!ifornia I                      Rancho Seco Utihty District 1974                                                                                                                                                                                         1970 GE - BWR                      588            EPC          1969 towa Light & Power Co.                         towa f,                     Duane Arnc!d 904              EPC          1967          1968 Arkansas Pcwer & Light                         Arkansas             B & W PWR I                      Arkansas thercar 1 Unit 1                                                                                                                                                                               1967 4
E.1. Hatch 1 Georgta Pcwer &
900              E            1966 Duke Power Co.                                 So. Carchna B & W PWR I                      Oconee 2                                                                                                                                                                              1967 900             E             1966 1                                                             Duke Power CD.                                   So. Carolina B & W PWR i                      Oconee 3                                                                                                                                                                              1967 Pennsylvania GE - BWR                           1103             EPC           1966 Peach Bottom 2                        PhJadelphia Electric 11CS              EPC          1966          1967 Philadelphia Electric                           Pennsylvania GE - BWR Peach Bottom 3                                                                                                                                            .
Georgia GE - BWR 813 E
1973                                                                                                                                                                                         1968 Westinghouse                 490             EPC           1967 Westinghouse for                                Wisconsin Point Beach 2                                                                                                PWR Wis.-Mich. Power Co.
1967 1969 l
900            E            1966          1966 Duke Power Co.                                  So. Carolina B & W PWR Oconee 1                                                                                                                                                                              1967
Southern Service Calvert Chtfs 1 Baltimere Gas & Electric Maryland Cornb. Eng.
834 EPC 1967 1969 i
PWR 1
I Rancho Seco Sacramento Municipal Ca!ifornia B&WPWR 950 EPMC 1967 1963 Utihty District 1974 Duane Arnc!d towa Light & Power Co.
towa GE - BWR 588 EPC 1969 1970 f,
I Arkansas thercar 1 Arkansas Pcwer & Light Arkansas B & W PWR 904 EPC 1967 1968 Unit 1 I
Oconee 2 Duke Power Co.
So. Carchna B & W PWR 900 E
1966 1967 4
1 Oconee 3 Duke Power CD.
So. Carolina B & W PWR 900 E
1966 1967 Peach Bottom 2 PhJadelphia Electric Pennsylvania GE - BWR 1103 EPC 1966 1967 i
Peach Bottom 3 Philadelphia Electric Pennsylvania GE - BWR 11CS EPC 1966 1967 1973 Point Beach 2 Westinghouse for Wisconsin Westinghouse 490 EPC 1967 1968 Wis.-Mich. Power Co.
PWR
{
{
* Ficrdia Power & Light                             Florida           Westinghouse                 724             EFC         1065 Turkey Point 4 l                                                                                                                                      PWR I                                                                                             *
Oconee 1 Duke Power Co.
'                  1972                                                                                                                                                                                         1968 GE - BWR                   658             EPC           1967 Boston Edison                                      Mass.
So. Carolina B & W PWR 900 E
Pilgrim 1 f                                                                                                                                                                  724            EPC          1965          1567 Ficrida Pcwer & Light                             Florida             Westinghouse Turkey Point 3 PWR 1971                                                                                                                                                                                         1967 GE - BWR                   545             EPC         1966 Getieral Efectric f or                            Minnesota
1966 1966 l
  >                          Monticello No. State Power Co.
Turkey Point 4 Ficrdia Power & Light Florida Westinghouse 724 EFC 1065 1967 PWR I
Comb. Eng.                 815             EPC         1966           1967 Consurners Power                                  Michigan f                            Palisades 1 PWR g    te          e P f 0 9
1972 Pilgrim 1 Boston Edison Mass.
* e n ,=
GE - BWR 658 EPC 1967 1968 Turkey Point 3 Ficrida Pcwer & Light Florida Westinghouse 724 EPC 1965 1567 f
                                                                #
PWR 1971 Monticello Getieral Efectric f or Minnesota GE - BWR 545 EPC 1966 1967 No. State Power Co.
* v
f Palisades 1 Consurners Power Michigan Comb. Eng.
: f. P #9 a s - 9 =. g en w; p q
815 EPC 1966 1967 PWR v
f.
P #9 a s - 9 =. g en w; p q g
te e P f 0 9
* e n,=


i
i b.s o,7 &a x.n*7.7-i T M
              -W b.s -
-W
o,7 &a x.n*7.7-i     M             T
[... g_- :;fl':.?~~~
                                                                              /                          7-q - m 1: .                      w          cQ F.u)4^*, @ vl.h., .ggg,r.s:ys
q - m 1:.
[. .5.. g_-;: :;fl':.?~~~
w cQ
                                                                                          '"'3                                                              ~
/
                    .r_                    . A ;          =-^^p              .
5. ;:
4 I        e
7-F.u)4^*, @ vl.h.,.ggg,r.s
{85                                    2J 9            NO.a                #
:ys
535EiEhs-E,$l'Sim**ph*1 'Q
'"'3
                                                                                                                                        %          w                     m e
~
                      -                        ~-            -                                                        . . _ _ _ , , , , _
($; .p,=. ;:53-lgdjlT~Ol?                  's ,5~ WC      W)<?-3h&E'LY                        V@i'si.i;d?5&.ed:hPklN5"*f%:).2:n.                        ::*
l s -
                                    .r.,-a            3 S5..
tR$,,@w:~:::                  *,.T&p 2.mJ5
                                                                                                        "&XQi.,7p&,9 m : .y m ,u.c          agM.@ f y;      h. *3f.~,_rw
                                                                                                                                                  ,:Jb .c.54    5lCp-* M.- %,.: , ...
  , -            c--
F.      c .M. $jg.x m'Sy::    J:?.,,
                                          .. e.~      <. 4MMy
                                                            - g :-..'.;t,s;'.*f  - - ..g,u;.7l.%
                                                                                          . c.pe a-mti?  ~ JM*4. y ; 3 t % s._,s. c t-TO s.-eWP:WE,?*L"49~ iC%WL$$1Ni d%h EbdficKlg.$EW<ar,3...j M&MG$4f:$)k_L.
                                                                                                                                          .                      . --.-?M4%%
1                                                                                                                                                              SAN ONOFRE 1
j 1
Commercial                                                                    Reactor Supplier          Gross      Bechtel    Start          Start Operation Client                    Location      & Type            MW          Scope    Engineering Ccnstruction Date-Unit j~
1 l              1970 Westinghouse for                    Wis:ensin      Westinghouse        490        EPC        1966        IS67 i                  Point Bea.h 1 Wis.-Mich. Power Co.                              PWR l                                                                                                                            470        PC          1965        1966 Westinghouse for                    fiew York      Westinghouse j                    Ginna 1 PWR Roch. Gas & Electric
:                                                  i
*#                                                  i 1969 India        GE - BWR              190        EPC        1964          1964 Tarapur 1                        IGE f or Indian AEC India        GE - BWR              190        EPC        1954          1964 k                    Tarapur 2                        IGE for indian AEC i
1968 l                                                                                                                                          EPC        1963          1964 Southern California Edison          California    Westinghouse          450 San Onofre 1 l                                                    San Drego Gas & Electric                          PWR j                1967.
4 Pennsylvania G A - HT R              46        EPC        IS58          1962 Peach Ect:om 1                  Philadelphia Ele:tric 1963 California    GE - BWR              69        EPC          1958        1960 Humboldt Bay 3                  Pacific Gas & E!ectric 1                                                                                                                                              -                    1961 General Ele:tri: -                  California    GE - Steam              0      C              -
j          3          VESR ESADA                                            Superheater l
j I              1962 Michigan      GE - BWR              75        EPC        1959        1960 Big Rock Point                  Consumers Power
}        g                                                                                  Canada        CGE - PFWR            20        PC            -          1959 m            f;PD                            Canadian
-j                                                      General Electric f or AECL fiebraska    Al - SG R              76        EC          1958        1559 Hallam                          AtoJni: Energy Ccmmission i      '8        1960 l                                                                                            Illinois      GE - BWR            210        EPC        1955        1957 t                      Dresden 1                        General Ele:tric for l          -
Commenv.ealth Edison I'              1957 GE - BWR                5        EPC        1955        1956 l                      VBWR                            General Ele:tr;c                    California Alaska        ALCO - PWR              2      E          1954          1955 APP R.1 A                        ALCO 1955 f;ew York    GE - SIR              10        EC          1952        1953
          +
West Milton                      General E!e:tric 1952 Idaho        AN L-LM F B R        0.2        M              -        1949 EBR-1                          Atomic Er.ergy Commission
) '
i                E - ENGINEERING P - PROCUREMENT C - C0tiSTRUCTION M - MANAGEMEflT 4
4
4
. A ;
=-^^p 535EiEhs-E,$l'Sim**ph*1 'Q
.r_
{85 2J 9 NO.a I
e m
w
~-
e
($ p :53-lgdjlT~Ol? 's W C W)<?-3h&E'LY V@i'si.i;d?5&.ed:hPklN5"*f%:).2:n S5..,5~ *,.T&p
"&XQi.,7p&,9 agM.
<. - g :-..'.;t,s;'.*f,u;.7l.% ti? M*4. y ; 3 t % s._,s. c
,u.c @ f y; b h. *3 5lCp-M..:,...
f.~,_rw * - %,
l
;.,=. ;
.r.,-a tR$,,@w:~:::
3 F. c.. m'.. J:
m :
.y m
,:J.c.54 s -
2.mJ5 s.-eWP:WE M&MG$4f:$)k_L.. --.-?M4%%
4MMy Sy:: ?.,,,?*L"49~ iC%WL$$1Ni d%h EbdficKlg.$EW<ar,3...j.
- -..g. c.pe a-m ~ J c--
e.~
t-TO M $jg.x 1
SAN ONOFRE 1
1j Commercial Reactor Operation Supplier Gross Bechtel Start Start Date-Unit Client Location
& Type MW Scope Engineering Ccnstruction j ~
1 l
1970 i
Point Bea h 1 Westinghouse for Wis:ensin Westinghouse 490 EPC 1966 IS67 Wis.-Mich. Power Co.
PWR l
j Ginna 1 Westinghouse for fiew York Westinghouse 470 PC 1965 1966 Roch. Gas & Electric PWR i
1969 i
Tarapur 1 IGE f or Indian AEC India GE - BWR 190 EPC 1964 1964 k
Tarapur 2 IGE for indian AEC India GE - BWR 190 EPC 1954 1964 i
l 1968 l
San Onofre 1 Southern California Edison California Westinghouse 450 EPC 1963 1964 San Drego Gas & Electric PWR j
1967.
Peach Ect:om 1 Philadelphia Ele:tric Pennsylvania G A - HT R 46 EPC IS58 1962 4
1963 Humboldt Bay 3 Pacific Gas & E!ectric California GE - BWR 69 EPC 1958 1960 1
1961 j
3 VESR General Ele:tri: -
California GE - Steam 0
C ESADA Superheater l
j I
1962
}
g Big Rock Point Consumers Power Michigan GE - BWR 75 EPC 1959 1960 m
f;PD Canadian Canada CGE - PFWR 20 PC 1959
-j General Electric f or AECL Hallam AtoJni: Energy Ccmmission fiebraska Al - SG R 76 EC 1958 1559 i
'8 1960 t
Dresden 1 General Ele:tric for Illinois GE - BWR 210 EPC 1955 1957 l
l Commenv.ealth Edison I'
1957 l
VBWR General Ele:tr;c California GE - BWR 5
EPC 1955 1956 APP R.1 A ALCO Alaska ALCO - PWR 2
E 1954 1955 1955 West Milton General E!e:tric f;ew York GE - SIR 10 EC 1952 1953
+
1952 EBR-1 Atomic Er.ergy Commission Idaho AN L-LM F B R 0.2 M
1949
) '
E - ENGINEERING P - PROCUREMENT C - C0tiSTRUCTION M - MANAGEMEflT i
4 4


I
I
      ;~
;~
Experienced Power Plant Engineering and Construction Personnel i
Experienced Power Plant Engineering and Construction Personnel iI, Bechtel's ability to provide clients with specific services and j
I,     Bechtel's ability to provide clients with specific services and j       expertise is made possible by the number and diversity of experienced personnel available within the organization.
expertise is made possible by the number and diversity of experienced personnel available within the organization.
  .l j       More than 43,000 professional, technical, and support personnel are employed by Bechtel on projects throughout the world. More j       than 50 percent of these are graduate engineers. As manloading j       requirements change on various projects,. Bechtel has the l       flexibility to meet the needs of all the divisions of the 2
.l j
Bechtel group of companies. Within Bechtel Power Corporation, j       there are more than 20,000 personnel. These include:
More than 43,000 professional, technical, and support personnel are employed by Bechtel on projects throughout the world.
I 3
More j
e    55 nuclear power plant project managers i             e     65 nuclear power plant construction managers 1
than 50 percent of these are graduate engineers.
1             e      1,060 nuclear power plant planning, scheduling, and j f s              estimating personnel
As manloading j
[p               e    1,000 quality control personnel
requirements change on various projects,. Bechtel has the l
* e     2,000 power plant field engineers o    600 power plant construction supervisors
flexibility to meet the needs of all the divisions of the Bechtel group of companies.
.]                e    170 quality assurance personnel e     200 nuclear and environmental engineers 4               e     2,900 procurement personnel worldwide I
Within Bechtel Power Corporation, 2
1                e    3,000 project support personnel including personnel 4                     qualified in labor relations
j there are more than 20,000 personnel.
);                                                                 '
These include:
j                         -
I 55 nuclear power plant project managers 3
e i
e 65 nuclear power plant construction managers 1
1 1,060 nuclear power plant planning, scheduling, and e
j estimating personnel s
f
[p 1,000 quality control personnel
* e 2,000 power plant field engineers e
600 power plant construction supervisors o
170 quality assurance personnel
.]
e 200 nuclear and environmental engineers e
4 e
2,900 procurement personnel worldwide I
3,000 project support personnel including personnel 1
e 4
qualified in
);
labor relations j
safety 1
safety 1
1 a
1 rigging a
rigging j         .
j welding / metallurgy nuclear. licensing containment design health' physics, security
welding / metallurgy nuclear. licensing containment design health' physics, security
?
  ?
l
l
* Quality Control department established in 1970 1
* Quality Control department established in 1970 1
Line 1,279: Line 1,943:


e i.
e i.
        ,1, Participation in Cedes and Standards Committees i
,1, Participation in Cedes and Standards Committees i;
          ;      In recognition of the important role that the National Codes and Standards program occupies in the development and applica-l         tion of commercial nuclear power, Bechtel participates exten-1         sively through the commitment of experienced engineers on national codes and standards committees. A review shows that Y
In recognition of the important role that the National Codes and Standards program occupies in the development and applica-l tion of commercial nuclear power, Bechtel participates exten-1 sively through the commitment of experienced engineers on national codes and standards committees.
Bechtel Power Corporation had 105 engineers serving on 234 a         committees. A breakdown of this service is shown below. An o          additional 40 to 50 engineers from other Bechtel organizations y              also participate in the national codes and standards program.
A review shows that Y
t l             Bechtel participation in codes and standards work benefits a
Bechtel Power Corporation had 105 engineers serving on 234 a
  ;{             client's project in two ways. The most direct benefit is that
committees.
?                 the latest issues, some of which may not be published yet, can 4             . be considered. Probably the most important benefit is the feed-
A breakdown of this service is shown below.
' t'              back from actual engineering and construction work to the various El               code committees. This enables consideration of special require-fl1              ments in the development of the industry standards required for commercialization.
An additional 40 to 50 engineers from other Bechtel organizations oy also participate in the national codes and standards program.
O
t l
  ~, e Bechtel Power Corporation Participation in Code and Standards Committees
Bechtel participation in codes and standards work benefits a
:;                Activity       Number of Engineers       Number of Committees t          ANS                   24                         34 ANSI                 20                         35 F''            ASME                 28                         55 ASTM                   6                         24
;{
'f ,
client's project in two ways.
IEEE Others 28 22 51 35 d
The most direct benefit is that
fi                                     128*                       234,
?
* 23 engineers participate in committees from more than Gl                 one Society 4               .
the latest issues, some of which may not be published yet, can 4
' t' be considered.
Probably the most important benefit is the feed-back from actual engineering and construction work to the various El code committees.
This enables consideration of special require-fl ments in the development of the industry standards required 1
for commercialization.
Oe
~,
Bechtel Power Corporation Participation in Code and Standards Committees Activity Number of Engineers Number of Committees ANS 24 34 t
ANSI 20 35 F'
ASME 28 55 ASTM 6
24
'f IEEE 28 51 Others 22 35 d
fi 128*
: 234,
* 23 engineers participate in committees from more than Gl one Society 4
b
b
      'i gll e
'i gll e
i
i
  %l
%l
.k k:
.k k:
5;
5;


1   1
1 1
    ',  2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT Bechtel's project team concept requires that projects be carried out under the di-rection of a project manager who will manage, schedule, and integrate the many project activities. The project manager is the Bechtel team leader and is responsi-ble to the client and Bechtel management for the successful completion of the pro-j             ject in accordance with agreed-upon. objectives. He has direct and continuing ac-cess to the division general manager. He is Bechtel's prime point of contact with l>            the owner, acting through whatever organizational approach the owner desig-nates.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT 2
: f. c
Bechtel's project team concept requires that projects be carried out under the di-rection of a project manager who will manage, schedule, and integrate the many project activities. The project manager is the Bechtel team leader and is responsi-ble to the client and Bechtel management for the successful completion of the pro-j ject in accordance with agreed-upon. objectives. He has direct and continuing ac-l cess to the division general manager. He is Bechtel's prime point of contact with the owner, acting through whatever organizational approach the owner desig-
    )p At the onset of a project, the Bechtel team leader, working with the owner, estab-lishes project objectives and directs the formulation of the project plan to meet them. He ensures that the project team is appropriately staffed with qualified per-i    f
: f. c nates.
                -      sonnel. He and his team establish the procedures and project controls to be used,
)p At the onset of a project, the Bechtel team leader, working with the owner, estab-lishes project objectives and directs the formulation of the project plan to meet them. He ensures that the project team is appropriately staffed with qualified per-sonnel. He and his team establish the procedures and project controls to be used, i
            !          tailoring them to the specific project and obtaining the owner's concurrence where the procedures interface with the owner's organization, procedures, and desires.
f tailoring them to the specific project and obtaining the owner's concurrence where the procedures interface with the owner's organization, procedures, and desires.
n   2    'r         He establishes strong formal and informal communications channels. not only be-tween himself and his owner counterpart but also between Bechtel-owner channels
n 'r He establishes strong formal and informal communications channels. not only be-tween himself and his owner counterpart but also between Bechtel-owner channels 2
        ;              at appropriate key team levels. Supporting and comp!cmenting these, he arranges 9                   reporting means to give the project visibility desired by the owner and Bechtel J                 management. He arranges documentation of objectives, plans, and procedures and j               ensures that the project technical scope and the detailed Bechtel scope af services are documented to the owner's satisfaction.
at appropriate key team levels. Supporting and comp!cmenting these, he arranges 9
t The Bechtel team leader, acting through his key team members, monitors all pro-Ti                 ject activities from inception through completion, adjusting the project plan as necessary to meet changing objectives or circumstances, always in concert with and to the detail required by the owner. He and his team identify departures from the plan and take appropriate corrective action. He is also the administrator of the Bechtel-owner contract and is responsible for execution and close out to the owner's and Bechtel management's satisfaction. In summary, the Bechtel team leader makes sure that the project members are working in the close rapport re-quired and that they are appropriately supported by the strength of the Bechtel
reporting means to give the project visibility desired by the owner and Bechtel J
    .-l               division and corporate resources.
management. He arranges documentation of objectives, plans, and procedures and j
  "                    The project manager acts for the owner using the project management concept. He j                     receives directions, develops instructions, receives reports, and prepares recom-mendations to be submitted to the owner.
ensures that the project technical scope and the detailed Bechtel scope af services are documented to the owner's satisfaction.
The Bechtel team leader, acting through his key team members, monitors all pro-t Ti ject activities from inception through completion, adjusting the project plan as necessary to meet changing objectives or circumstances, always in concert with and to the detail required by the owner. He and his team identify departures from the plan and take appropriate corrective action. He is also the administrator of the Bechtel-owner contract and is responsible for execution and close out to the owner's and Bechtel management's satisfaction. In summary, the Bechtel team leader makes sure that the project members are working in the close rapport re-quired and that they are appropriately supported by the strength of the Bechtel
.-l division and corporate resources.
The project manager acts for the owner using the project management concept. He j
receives directions, develops instructions, receives reports, and prepares recom-mendations to be submitted to the owner.
Engineers, contractors, and suppliers receive their instructions from the project 1
Engineers, contractors, and suppliers receive their instructions from the project 1
manager, perform their assigned tasks. and report results to the project manager.
manager, perform their assigned tasks. and report results to the project manager.
In summary, the project management team functions as an extension of the owner's organization and acts on behalf of and in the interest of the owner to:
In summary, the project management team functions as an extension of the owner's organization and acts on behalf of and in the interest of the owner to:
o '
o
* Establish budgets, control costs. and ensure adherence to schedules q
* Establish budgets, control costs. and ensure adherence to schedules
            -
* Manage and integrate planning and engineering work by design firms q
* Manage and integrate planning and engineering work by design firms
      !
* Procure major plant equipment, senices. and supplies i
* Procure major plant equipment, senices. and supplies i
* Coordinate and manage the activities of construction supplies q
* Coordinate and manage the activities of construction supplies q
  ^
* Supen-ise preoperational testing
* Supen-ise preoperational testing d   ,
^
k
d k


i.
i.
        }                                       PROJECT CONTROLS bp i;
}
w /
PROJECT CONTROLS bp i;
              )    INTRODUCTION I
)
I In the execution and management of large, complex projects, numerous organizations become involved in the process of design j           and construction. Careful coordination of these organizations is i           needed to provide the proper flow of drawings and materials to a
INTRODUCTION w /
      ;            site, and the proper sequencing of construction and startup i             activities.
I I
In the execution and management of large, complex projects, numerous organizations become involved in the process of design j
and construction.
Careful coordination of these organizations is i
needed to provide the proper flow of drawings and materials to a site, and the proper sequencing of construction and startup i
activities.
1
1
      )
)
Fundamental to this coordination is a wide range of activities
Fundamental to this coordination is a wide range of activities d.
: d.                 that include the development of a project plan, operating i
that include the development of a project plan, operating i
    '              policies and procedures, organization charts and responsibility assignments, and the scoping'of work segments. Equally essential
policies and procedures, organization charts and responsibility assignments, and the scoping'of work segments.
./                 is the implementation of a project control system that provides consistent and accurate project status for client and Bechtel management visibility and decision making.
Equally essential
h                   Bechtel, with its broad experience in major engineering and q                   construction projects, maintains a comprehensive library of v3.                state-of-the-art cost, schedule, and material control programs a                   that can be modified for project uniqueness and for client i
./
internal and external reporting and control requirements.         After project and client requirements are specified and program selections made, the programs are assembled into an integrated project control system.
is the implementation of a project control system that provides consistent and accurate project status for client and Bechtel management visibility and decision making.
        '.        Bechtel's project control programs are viable programs that can
h Bechtel, with its broad experience in major engineering and q
(}                 be used on projects without the need for change. They can, "I                 however, be modified as necessary to meet specific client or j             project requirements.
construction projects, maintains a comprehensive library of v3 state-of-the-art cost, schedule, and material control programs a
J J
that can be modified for project uniqueness and for client i
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION d                 The project control system is based on existing programs, but is
internal and external reporting and control requirements.
  .;              tailored to meet specific client requirements.         In general, the control system consists of:
After project and client requirements are specified and program selections made, the programs are assembled into an integrated project control system.
: a. A mutually l' agreed-up~n o    project plan that incorporates resultant schedules and cost and quantity budgets
Bechtel's project control programs are viable programs that can
: b. A monitoring plan that continually measures actual
(}
    ,                  performance against the plan
be used on projects without the need for change.
]j                 c. A reporting program that identifies deviations from that plan i
They can, "I
: d. An action program to anti.cipate and correct project-related
however, be modified as necessary to meet specific client or j
.l                       problems, and to take advantage of project-related
project requirements.
;"                      opportunities.
J SYSTEM DESCRIPTION J
l
d The project control system is based on existing programs, but is tailored to meet specific client requirements.
* 1 s
In general, the control system consists of:
A mutually l' agreed-up~n project plan that incorporates a.
o resultant schedules and cost and quantity budgets b.
A monitoring plan that continually measures actual performance against the plan
]j c.
A reporting program that identifies deviations from that plan i
d.
An action program to anti.cipate and correct project-related
.l problems, and to take advantage of project-related opportunities.
l 1
s


I.
.I.
s
s The project plan defines the scope of work, identifies services to be provided, assigns responsibilities, and identifies contrcls, methods, and procedures for reeeting agreed-upon objectives.
      ,    _    The project plan defines the scope of work, identifies services to be provided, assigns responsibilities, and identifies contrcls, 3            methods, and procedures for reeeting agreed-upon objectives.
3 4
4 I           The plan is modified as necessary to accommodate client require-l           ments and, when mutually approved by client and Bechtel manage-ment, becomes the basis for measurement of project performance.
I The plan is modified as necessary to accommodate client require-l ments and, when mutually approved by client and Bechtel manage-ment, becomes the basis for measurement of project performance.
Reports to client management indicate the status and progress a             of the project and project performance.
Reports to client management indicate the status and progress a
of the project and project performance.
L 3
L 3
The plan is expanded, refined, and updated as required as the j             project passes through the phases of design, procurement, a               construction, and startup. Visibility of the plan ensures l             that control can be accomplished by responsible individuals at i             each organizational level for all project phases. To accommodate I             this visibility, control programs are designed on a modular f           concept so that each can stand alone as a control tool yet be l             fully integrated into the project control system.
The plan is expanded, refined, and updated as required as the j
1 Integration of the program modules is accomplished through the use of standardized codes for activities, quantities, and
project passes through the phases of design, procurement, a
  ;            cost. This coding system is an interrelated series of structured i             numbers which provide a set relationship of the detailed elements i           in each module to each other, to all other modules in the system, I           and to the project as a whole. Individual modules can be manual f           or automated depending on project requirements without affecting i       ,~"   module approach or methodology; this provides significant 3             flexibility in arranging the tools to support client and Bechtel j           -
construction, and startup.
Visibility of the plan ensures l
that control can be accomplished by responsible individuals at i
each organizational level for all project phases.
To accommodate I
this visibility, control programs are designed on a modular f
concept so that each can stand alone as a control tool yet be l
fully integrated into the project control system.
1 Integration of the program modules is accomplished through the use of standardized codes for activities, quantities, and cost.
This coding system is an interrelated series of structured i
numbers which provide a set relationship of the detailed elements i
in each module to each other, to all other modules in the system, I
and to the project as a whole.
Individual modules can be manual f
or automated depending on project requirements without affecting i
,~"
module approach or methodology; this provides significant 3
flexibility in arranging the tools to support client and Bechtel j
management requirements while still maintaining system integrity.
management requirements while still maintaining system integrity.
1
1 The project control system consists of three primary programs:
  ;            The project control system consists of three primary programs:
j schedule control, cost control, and material control.
j               schedule control, cost control, and material control.
i 1
i 1               Bechtel's standardized approach to schedule control utilizes 1               an integratcd system of computerized and noncomputerized planning d             and scheduling techniques and procedures that assist the client
Bechtel's standardized approach to schedule control utilizes 1
    ,          and Bechtel management in developing a valid plan, monitoring j             performance, and producing reports that permit redirection of 0             plan objectives to the best interest of the project.
an integratcd system of computerized and noncomputerized planning d
e
and scheduling techniques and procedures that assist the client and Bechtel management in developing a valid plan, monitoring
              .Bechtel's cost control system is supported by a code of accounts l            which provides an overall project structure to the various estimates and budgets used to accomplish cost control. Fore-J               casting is performed periodically along with a continuous j               monitoring system consisting of trending, home office cost
,j performance, and producing reports that permit redirection of 0
]               control, and procurement cost control.
plan objectives to the best interest of the project.
e l
.Bechtel's cost control system is supported by a code of accounts which provides an overall project structure to the various estimates and budgets used to accomplish cost control.
Fore-J casting is performed periodically along with a continuous j
monitoring system consisting of trending, home office cost
]
control, and procurement cost control.
1 4
1 4
1
1
-1 m
-1 m
d
d:i A
:i A
M
M


j               Bechtel provides an overview of the project scope of defining
j Bechtel provides an overview of the project scope of defining
: j. c             materials from conceptual quantities through detail design
: j. c materials from conceptual quantities through detail design
      'f 1           takeoff with a sophisticated and comprehensive material control I   /     system. Material control encompasses the identification,
'f 1
  !                quantification, and status updating to provide visibility of i             equipment and material scope during all phases of a project.
takeoff with a sophisticated and comprehensive material control I
/
system.
Material control encompasses the identification, quantification, and status updating to provide visibility of i
equipment and material scope during all phases of a project.
Quantification of basic materials enables the project scope to be measured in terms common to engineering, construction, and the support services.
Quantification of basic materials enables the project scope to be measured in terms common to engineering, construction, and the support services.
PROGRAM SELECTION 1
PROGRAM SELECTION 1
i The project control system is administered by Bechtel's project j
i The project control system is administered by Bechtel's project manager; he is responsible for module coordination, j
manager; he is responsible for module coordination, implementation, and updating. The modules that make up specific j                 programs are identified in policy manuals.     The client and i               Bechtel may select the most appropriate tools from these manuals, J                 and decide if operation of the system should be fully automated, d               partially automated, or manual. The project's cost / schedule 1
implementation, and updating.
supervisor, engineer, field construction manager, and startup q               engineer have the responsibility of supporting the project e               manager in this activity. Functional departments are responsible l                 for providi.ng guidance and input.
The modules that make up specific j
programs are identified in policy manuals.
The client and i
Bechtel may select the most appropriate tools from these manuals, J
and decide if operation of the system should be fully automated, d
partially automated, or manual.
The project's cost / schedule 1
supervisor, engineer, field construction manager, and startup q
engineer have the responsibility of supporting the project e
manager in this activity.
Functional departments are responsible l
for providi.ng guidance and input.
FEATURES OF THE CONTROL SYSTEM
FEATURES OF THE CONTROL SYSTEM
  )               Bechtel's fully integrated project control system is designed to h                 facilitate rapid solution of problems on large projects. Program 4                 modules using standardized codes are linked to indicate project actions.and their impact on cost / schedule and resources.
)
]j                Automation may be provided by a state-of-the-art management software system for the material, scheduling, and cost y             processing. Visibility may be provided graphically to display q                 project objectives in tabular or plotted form or on a CRT
Bechtel's fully integrated project control system is designed to h
  ;              terminal. The scheduling system has the capability to distribute q                 resources (quantity / manhours) over the work activities and to n               redistribute remaining resources (using Bechtel's historical
facilitate rapid solution of problems on large projects.
]               experience) over these activities 'as progress is reported. This y
Program 4
'                feature provides quick assessment of time and resource status and the depicting of "what-if" scenarios as rapidly as possible.
modules using standardized codes are linked to indicate project
]j actions.and their impact on cost / schedule and resources.
Automation may be provided by a state-of-the-art management software system for the material, scheduling, and cost y
processing.
Visibility may be provided graphically to display q
project objectives in tabular or plotted form or on a CRT terminal.
The scheduling system has the capability to distribute q
resources (quantity / manhours) over the work activities and to n
redistribute remaining resources (using Bechtel's historical
]
experience) over these activities 'as progress is reported.
This y
feature provides quick assessment of time and resource status and the depicting of "what-if" scenarios as rapidly as possible.
Data for historical comparison can be utilized to provide
Data for historical comparison can be utilized to provide
                . management with quick access to historical reference points so that they can more rapidly evaluate the condition of the project from a non-project perspe.ctive.
. management with quick access to historical reference points so that they can more rapidly evaluate the condition of the project from a non-project perspe.ctive.
Another part of the project control system is an integrated ccet
Another part of the project control system is an integrated ccet
]               system that can provide quantity, manhour, and cost status, j             measure this status against the project plan, and report at any e
<]
level of detail a comprehensive comparison to the plan and/or historical data.
system that can provide quantity, manhour, and cost status, j
h             This system provides the client with access to project data in
measure this status against the project plan, and report at any level of detail a comprehensive comparison to the plan and/or e
.j               essentially the same manner that it is provided to Bechtel a                project and division management, enabling mutual participation in d               project decisions with complete awareness of project status.
historical data.
il ily                                                                                   .
h This system provides the client with access to project data in
.j essentially the same manner that it is provided to Bechtel project and division management, enabling mutual participation in a
d project decisions with complete awareness of project status.
il ily


          .:=                   _
.:=
                                  ... .    --        , __ c -     .
, __ c -
v=         =   ..
v=
                                                                                            =a_=_-.._          _
=
cm   m               m   r     =r               :    m a       en ec--
=a_=_-.._
e
cm m
                                                                                                                ) --
m r
ELEMENTS OF PROJECT CONTROL PROJECT PLAN                                     MONITORING THE PLAN
=r e
                                                ~'
m a
OBJECTIVE PROVIDE INFORMATION
en ec--
                                                  .                        TO IDENTIFY PROBLEM AREAS AND                             '
) --
INITIATE CORRECTIVE ACTION:
ELEMENTS OF PROJECT CONTROL PROJECT PLAN MONITORING THE PLAN OBJECTIVE
~'
PROVIDE INFORMATION TO IDENTIFY PROBLEM AREAS AND INITIATE CORRECTIVE ACTION:
Material Control Cost Control Schedule Control
Material Control Cost Control Schedule Control
                                              \
\\
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTING DEVIATIONS l
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTING DEVIATIONS l
1 THE CONTROL CYCLE
1 THE CONTROL CYCLE


                    . . ~ . . .             - . . .                  - . -              w. .                   - ~~a               -                  ~-~=+                   .-2---                                 .
.. ~...
rocx c3                  -
: w..
em         -
- ~~a
am                                                               r- m<n                                   .          D      .-
~ - ~ = +
V i
.-2---
* SCOPE 0F PROJECT SCOPE SIZE      l LOCATION l SERVICES -               OBJECTIVES                   SYSTEMS         l SCHEDULE j                                                                                       I                 I             I                       I                         I             I l                 ORDER OF MAGNITUDE                                                                                             k i                 PRELIMINARY                                                                                                 ESTIMATE DEFINITIVE l
D c
5                                                                                         .i BUDGETS ENG. & H.O.           MATERIAL           QUANTITY                         LABOR S       Y                             '
em am roc r-m<n x
j                                                                                      BUDGET         COST BUDGET           BUDGETS                         BUDGET 4                     4                 4                                                           4 4-i                 CONTINUOUS                                                                             COST               QUANTITY                                                   INTERMEDIATE
V 3
;                  MONITORING &                                             CEBUS                             &              TRACKING                             FOCUS                     & DETAll     REPORTS I
i SCOPE 0F PROJECT SCOPE l LOCATION l SERVICES -
REPORTING                                                                       COMMITMENT                 SYSTEM                                                     SCllEDULES I                         I                                                             I                     I 1   r i
l SCHEDULE SIZE OBJECTIVES SYSTEMS j
CONSOLIDATED MONITORING,                                                                                                                                                                                   !
I I
!                  REPORTS AND MONTHLY                                                                                       TRENDING ACTIONS 1                 REVIEWS WITH BECHTEL AND OWNER MANAGEMENT                                                                               RESOLVED         l UNRESOLVED I
I I
I I
l ORDER OF MAGNITUDE k
i PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE DEFINITIVE l
5
.i BUDGETS ENG. & H.O.
MATERIAL QUANTITY LABOR S
Y j
BUDGET COST BUDGET BUDGETS BUDGET 4
4 4
4-4 i
CONTINUOUS COST QUANTITY INTERMEDIATE MONITORING &
CEBUS TRACKING FOCUS
& DETAll REPORTS I
REPORTING COMMITMENT SYSTEM SCllEDULES I
I I
I 1 r CONSOLIDATED MONITORING, i
REPORTS AND MONTHLY TRENDING ACTIONS 1
REVIEWS WITH BECHTEL AND OWNER MANAGEMENT RESOLVED l UNRESOLVED I
I l
I l
h
h OUARTERLY ORECAST F
!                  OUARTERLY                                                                                                 F ORECAST l                 REPORTS
l REPORTS CASH FLOW.
!                                                                                                                  CASH FLOW.       l     SCHEDULES                                                       RESULTS
l SCHEDULES RESULTS
                                                                                                                                  +                                                                                           ,
+
j                 OWNER & BECHTEL                                                                                   MANAGEMENT REPORTS l
j OWNER & BECHTEL MANAGEMENT REPORTS l
l
l


m._.~._.._._m.m.....                                                                                 .~mw-                               nm - -               - _ ,w -                           a     m &_. ..: _ _ .
m._.~._.._._m.m.....
: a. _ .
.~mw-nm - -
c                                                                                                                                                                               ;
- _,w -
: p. ,
a m &_...: _ _.
a.
c
: p.,
8
8
((    l'           *t2il           C"":           Q         Q             7           T                 i_.         C             C             CD       9         EN-   -
(
1      )--   -
l'
                                                                                                ,/                                                                                                                                                                           N ~-/
*t2il C"":
CQNSTRUCTION-ENGINEERING INTERFACE MILESTONE
Q Q
                                                                                                                                                                                          /~m.;>-
7 T
O--c              h. m./.s - r c 7 % ' ,-
i_.
                                                                                                                            ........4..................................**                                 a...aa...aaa..~aoa...
C C
i         ENGR  
CD 9
EN-1
)--
(
,/
~-/
N CQNSTRUCTION-ENGINEERING INTERFACE MILESTONE
/~m.;>- h. m./.s - r O--c c 7 % ',-
...........4..................................**
*a...aa...aaa..~aoa...
i ENGR  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
j [CONST  
j [CONST  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
 
' m. d............................................................................{,. r'. w....
                                                                                                                              ' m   > A .   - o d..
> A - o..,
                                                                                                                                                ..,      ..........................................................................{ ,. r'. w ....
c.,4j,c
                                                                                                                                                  /..............................................................................,*..
/..............................................................................,*..
c.,4j ,c                                                                              ...........................f.
................................................................................3h,%.,,.*
                                                                                                                                    *
...........................f.
* _ ................................................................................3h,%.,,.*
c
c
                                                                                                              ,              ..            ........................................................................... .. y W : W / ~
............................................................................. y W : W / ~
                                                                                                                / SYSTEM LOGIC BY DISCIPLINE                                                                                                              /F CILITY LOGlc
/ SYSTEM LOGIC
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            */ BY COMMODITY f ,. ^'l'^          ' '.'.'?
/F CILITY LOGlc BY DISCIPLINE
                                                                                                            *..GW
*/ BY COMMODITY
                                                                                                          .:.o-o        + g>h..  ': '...':::::::l         ....::,.,..
*..GW ': '...':::::::l....::,..
                                                                                                                                                .........l,,-
f,. ^'l'^ ' '.'.'?
                                                                                                                                                              *                                          **.......-..---.aa-..                       <
**.......-..---.aa-..
e[o y/   ,                                                                   .
< e[o
                                                                                              /
.:.o-o + g>h..y/
                                                                                                                                                                                                      .;:....; :::::::::::::p.
.........l,,-
                                                                                                                                                                            ..                              .                    / a
.;:....; :::::::::::::p.
:            5V                      SYSTEM
/
                                                                                                                                                                        . '. k
/ a
[ ."*
. '. k
I-ORIENTATION ''. '.               PREREQUISITEj i [                             d *i , -- w___
[."*
                                                                                                            *                                                              . I: 3 PACKAGES                     FACILITY             .
i 5V SYSTEM I-ORIENTATION ''. '.
A ~=                                   ORIENTATION         :.
PREREQUISITEj i [
                                                                                                  ._. ,  DE TAIL.. 4 SCHLDULE     . . .                      /, WHAT IS REQUIRED                                                   .-
d *, -- w___
DE TAIL SCHEDULE
. I: 3 PACKAGES FACILITY A ~=
                                                                                                            .           J
ORIENTATION DE TAIL SCHLDULE
                                                                                                      . . . .. .. .. ,~. ,, ,<. , , .
/, WHAT IS REQUIRED DE TAIL SCHEDULE
                                                                                                                                                              / WHEN IS IT REQUIRED                                                 h-o- o o-.o c>oo
.. 4 J
[     SPEC CONTROL                     ,
... ~,,.,,.
s
/ WHEN IS IT REQUIRED h-o-o o-.oc>oo
[ 3 MONTil ROLLING
[
                                                                                            /       DWG CONTROL                                                                       LOGS
SPEC CONTROL
[         2 WEEK DAILY
[ 3 MONTil ROLLING s
[           TASK CONTROL f
/
                                                                                                                                                              /               LARGE PIPE
DWG CONTROL LOGS
                                                                                                                                                                                                                            /       TASK CONTROL
[
                                                                                                                                                              /              SMALL PIPE
2 WEEK DAILY
                                                                                                                                                              /                 VALVES
[
                                                                                                                                                            /               INSTRUMENT
TASK CONTROL
                                                                                                                                                              /                 CKT & RW
/
                                                                                                                                                              /                 CIVIL
TASK CONTROL f
                                                                                                                                                              /                 OTHER       _
/
_ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _                                                                                -                                                _m.,-
LARGE PIPE
/
SMALL PIPE
/
VALVES
/
INSTRUMENT
/
CKT & RW
/
CIVIL
/
OTHER
_m.,-


          -  mu w w. w                   a           smm -                 .u ~ -:--w.w : m ~ :-w                                               ~ ~ e--                   -- a -w - -- - - - - -                                    --
mu w w. w a
k               T                 M             (. ;)                     P                 Q                       ;,w             N           Q             C             M               E           *-            *
smm -
* v                                                                                                         v CONSTRUCTION-STARTUP NTERFACE MILESTONE
.u ~ -:--w.w : m ~ :-w
[o o~c
~ ~ e--
: o.    --<
-- a -w - -- - - - - -
                                                                                                                                      -o. .
k T
O o
M
(.
;)
P Q
;,w N
Q C
M E
v v
CONSTRUCTION-STARTUP NTERFACE MILESTONE
[o o.
o./.
o./.
o---o--.~o.           ..-
O o---o--.~o..~. y -c'..-o---o, a"/
                                                                                                                                                    .~. ya"/*
-o..
                                                                                                                                                                -c' . .-o---o, c m,. . :&-                 _
o~c o
s
m &-
                                                        .......'.......................................~                                     ...~ ~....~.a       = =.- ~ ~.a..
s c
:            CONST  
....... '....................................... ~
....~ ~....~.a
= =.- ~ ~.a..
CONST  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
:              S/U  
S/U  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
W.., I........................................................................... g.. w h y.....
4.*.o,c'p.o c_
o.
-.o o opy /............................................................................/.. ;... cMm -o gf
..........................................................................,
* hl
:--.o Q*et".g/.v............................................................................r..g.......................
cs'.-
-c c..
*,4 o:/
/
/* FACILITY LOGIC BY COMMODITY AREA SYSTEM LOGIC i
a.,sELEV BY DISCIPLINE
----o-o-o n.
......-' " " " " " ~ -
p*p.*o-je2 c.j:.
..:. w :- o; h............./.......... ".,....,..
-ock ---< >
,-o
~
, *........ ~. ~ ~ ~ y~ ~ m ww_
yo "a
a j
*/
FACILITY
^
. =
.e k-
*j ORIENTATION
*A PREREQUISITE j d
* PACKAGES SYSTEM l
S" OnlENTAllON
(
DETAll SCHEDULE
/ WHAT IS REQUtnED
.' DETAll SCHEDULE
. 7..... ' ' '.,,.I.[
[WHEN IS IT DEOUinED hD PAQ
~...
., e as..
c>- O o--o W
[
3 MONTH ROLLING S/U RECAPS
[
[
2 WEEK DAILY LOGS PUNCH LIST TASK CONTHOL
[
TASK CONTROL
/
SMAtl. PIPE
/
VALVES
/
INSTRUMENT
/
CKT & nW
/
civil
/
S/U RECAPS Z.
Rwn s


4.*.o,c'p.o W .., I.. .........................................................................
~
c_      o.
?.
                                                                                  ..........................................................................,                                  g .. w h y.....        gf
                                                        -.o o opy /. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .*. . .hl
                                                                                                                                                                                                . . . . . .:--.o
                                                                                                                                                                                                            . . . . . . ./. . ;. . . cMm -o cs'.- -c              c..                                                                                                                                ,
                                *,4 Q*et".g/.v............................................................................r..g.......................
                                                            .  /
o:/,
                                        /* FACILITY LOGIC BY
* _-
* COMMODITY AREA                                                                                                                        :          SYSTEM LOGIC i
;                                              a.,sELEV ----o- o-o n .  .
BY DISCIPLINE
                                                                            .......,                                                              ......-' " " " " " ~ -            p*p.*o-je2          c.j:.
                                                                                        ~
                                  ..:. w :- o; h............./.. . . . . . . . . " . , . .,. . . , . .                                  , *. . . . . . . . ~ . ~ ~ ~ y~ ~ m ww_      -ock ---< > ,-o                >'
                                                                                                                                                            "*  "a      -
j      .
a    .
yo
                                                          */              FACILITY
                                                                                                    . = * ' *.e
                                                                                                                                        ^
k-
                                                    *j
* ORIENTATION                *
                                                                                                      .    *A
                                                                                                            . PREREQUISITE j d *
                                                                                                        .        PACKAGES                          SYSTEM                      :
l                                          S"                                            OnlENTAllON                :
(                                  DETAll SCHEDULE                                      / WHAT IS REQUtnED                                                                    .' DETAll SCHEDULE
                          . . 7..    . . . ' ' ' . , , .I.[
[WHEN IS IT DEOUinED                                                                  hD PAQ
                        ~.. .        ..      . , e    as . .                                                                                                              c>- O o--o W                                              .
3 MONTH ROLLING                                                    '
[              S/U RECAPS
[        2 WEEK DAILY                                                                          LOGS
[            PUNCH LIST TASK CONTHOL                                                                                                                          [          TASK CONTROL
                                                                                        /                  SMAtl. PIPE
                                                                                          /                  VALVES
                                                                                        /                INSTRUMENT
                                                                                          /                  CKT & nW
                                                                                          /                    civil
                                                                                        /                  S/U RECAPS Z.                  Rwn                s
 
                                                                              ._..                            ~
            ?.
t
t
          ;i.
;i.
Operating Plant Services v         i As' Bechtel's Operating Plant Services Organization provides a
Operating Plant Services i
'          3 complete range of services for operating nuclear plants.
v As' Bechtel's Operating Plant Services Organization provides a complete range of services for operating nuclear plants.
j                               Typical services which have rec'ently-been provided at more j                                 than 25 operating nuclear units include the following:
3
e          Plant Inspections and Walkdowns
' j Typical services which have rec'ently-been provided at more j
_j                               e         Support for NRC Bulletins
than 25 operating nuclear units include the following:
                        '^
Plant Inspections and Walkdowns e
o        Engineering Studies and Consultation j                                 e          Capital Improvements.and Expansions e         Licensing Support l}?                                e         Emergency Response Services o         Outage Management                                                                                                             t i
_j e
i                              e         Plant Maintenance e         Instrument Calibrations a                                o'       Circuit Verification e        Performance Tes' ting l               ,s            e . Preventive Maintenance
Support for NRC Bulletins
- .4                        /
'^
                              )'         e Spare Parts Program JN/                           e Operating Procedures and Training 3                                 e.       System As-Builts N                               e 1                                                  Records Management 3
Engineering Studies and Consultation o
e' Craft Labor Services e Vendor Shop Quality Surveillance                                                                           -
j Capital Improvements.and Expansions e
      -g-                                                                                                                                                                           ,
Licensing Support e
        ?
l}
I i
e Emergency Response Services
1                                                                         .                            .
?
a                                                                           .
o Outage Management t
t i
i i
cl-1 (m 7-
e Plant Maintenance e
  ~ - - -         e,--,       ,n-sn- ---w_  a, --.n..- a---sa, - - -,. --,-       , . -, , - ---,---.--,-,    e-- -
Instrument Calibrations o' Circuit Verification a
e-,--,--,e - - - - ,-r-m-, ,  - -
Performance Tes' ting e
                                                                                                                                                            , - - - -,- --- -,y---,
l e. Preventive Maintenance
,s
)'
Spare Parts Program e
-.4
/
JN/
Operating Procedures and Training e
3 e.
System As-Builts N
1 e
Records Management 3
e' Craft Labor Services Vendor Shop Quality Surveillance e
-g-
?
Ii 1
a t
i cl-1 (m 7-
~ - - -
e,--,
,n-sn-
---w a,
--.n..-
a---sa, - - -,. --,-
e--
e-,--,--,e
- - - -,-r-m-,
-,y---,


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        . e f}                                                                                               [N V                                                                                                     \j                                                                                             L/
e f}
                      . s c e , ,i -,..o.. ,o .. . .c. e, eoe, setaveosrunn amo nor necessmen y asvlas                                                           BECHTEL POWER CO,,o,ATION                                           RECHTEL POWER CORPORATlON M7s7*s',%M""' ' "'" "                                                                                       H. O. Re.n ch                                                             SAN FRANCISCO g                                             PRESIDENT
[N V
                                                                                                                                                                                                            $ JULY 1,1982 EL         R 8hCM 3 A t         g                                             J. V. Motowski R. M' froalms                                               VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRF10 DENT                                             & $PECIAL A$$lSTANT
\\j L/
                                                                  & MANAGER E NGINE E RING                   CONSTRUCTION                             OUALITY             SAN FR ANCISCO         LOS ANGE1ES         GAITHER$ BURG                   A*fN ARBOR AND SERVICES                           A$$URANCE             POWER OtV1580N         POWER DIVISION         POWER DIVillON               POWER DfVISION f                               A. L Cohsi                       M. J. Mitcheit                         J M. An'e'el                                   assonwAtal         leasTHansevnos                   (asses Assong MAN.4GER                           MANAGER                               MANAGER               C. D. $tatton       L. G. Hmkofmesi           J. M. komes                 H. W. Wsa.l VICE PRE 110ENT       VICE PRESIDENT         VICE PRE $1 DENT             VICE PRE $sDENT
RECHTEL POWER CORPORATlON
                                                                                                                              & GENERAL MGR.         & CENER AL MGR.       & GENERAL MGR.               & CENERAL MGR.
. s c e,,i -,..o..,o...
ee                                   eo                         P. A. HoHenbach                                                               WlG. Henry PROCUMEMENT                                                                                                                    C..W. Seamord
.c. e, eoe, setaveosrunn amo nor necessmen y asvlas BECHTEL POWER CO,,o,ATION M7s7*s',%M""' ' "'" "
;                                                                                    CONTROLLER VICE PRESIDENT                               VICE PRE 11 DENT             VICE PRESIDENT T. J. Hohe                         W. W. Wilson                         & DEPUTY GEN. MGR.                           & DEPUTY GEN. MGR,           & DEPUTY GEN. MGR.
H. O. Re.n ch SAN FRANCISCO g
MANAGER                             MANAGER HOUSTON                                                         BFCHTEL ENERGY AR E A OF F 6CE                                                     CORPOR A TION (HOUSTONI                                                              8 '' 'N8 J.'M.'E onnes D. W. Heilatise                                                       PR ESIDENT VICE PRE $10ENT                                                           R. H. Stone
PRESIDENT
                                                                                                                                                        & MANAGER                                                         OPER ATOONS MGR.
$ JULY 1,1982 8hCM J. V. Motowski EL R
hlOT E:                                                                                                                                                               oe RECEIVES FUNCTIONAL CtrDANCE FROM THE ALL PE R$0NNE L B ASED IN HOME OF FICE                                             g                                                                              APPtICABLE SAN FRANCISCO SERVICE ORGr.NIZATION UNLE SS OTHERWWISE INDICATED
3 A t g
                                                                                                                                                                                        % REPLACES CHARf DATED FEBRUARY 22.17c2
R. M' froalms VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRF10 DENT
& $PECIAL A$$lSTANT
& MANAGER E NGINE E RING CONSTRUCTION OUALITY SAN FR ANCISCO LOS ANGE1ES GAITHER$ BURG A*fN ARBOR AND SERVICES A$$URANCE POWER OtV1580N POWER DIVISION POWER DIVillON POWER DfVISION f
A. L Cohsi M. J. Mitcheit J M. An'e'el assonwAtal leasTHansevnos (asses Assong MAN.4GER MANAGER MANAGER C. D. $tatton L. G. Hmkofmesi J. M. komes H. W. Wsa.l VICE PRE 110ENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRE $1 DENT VICE PRE $sDENT
& GENERAL MGR.
& CENER AL MGR.
& GENERAL MGR.
& CENERAL MGR.
ee eo P. A. HoHenbach C..W. Seamord WlG. Henry PROCUMEMENT CONTROLLER VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRE 11 DENT VICE PRESIDENT T. J. Hohe W. W. Wilson
& DEPUTY GEN. MGR.
& DEPUTY GEN. MGR,
& DEPUTY GEN. MGR.
MANAGER MANAGER HOUSTON BFCHTEL ENERGY AR E A OF F 6CE CORPOR A TION 8 '' 'N8 (HOUSTONI J.'M.'E onnes D. W. Heilatise PR ESIDENT VICE PRE $10ENT R. H. Stone
& MANAGER OPER ATOONS MGR.
hlOT E:
oe RECEIVES FUNCTIONAL CtrDANCE FROM THE ALL PE R$0NNE L B ASED IN HOME OF FICE APPtICABLE SAN FRANCISCO SERVICE ORGr.NIZATION g
UNLE SS OTHERWWISE INDICATED
% REPLACES CHARf DATED FEBRUARY 22.17c2


                  -.s- A a - . s   .--s-. 2-- 0 A -      r u- a.,_.
-.s-A a -
g .
s
g                                                                               #
.--s-.
4
2--
      \ ()
0 A
:                                                                        4 t,.
r u-a.,_.
g.
g 4
\\ ()
4 t,.
4 ei
4 ei
                                                                                    }.
}.
r, V ~<
r, V ~<
1 l
1 l
I9 y "
I9 y
l . 'l4 s
l. 'l4 s
t 3.
t 3.
24 hf; r
24 hf; r
k v
k v
e e) o .                                                                   k'-
e) o.
i T
e i
                                                                                    -t   .
k'-
                                                                                      )
T
-t
)
j,ll
j,ll
                                                                                      <i h.
<i h.
:i
:i
                                                                          '%(
'%(
e T
e T
7 Il kt C
7 Il kt C
es g ~.       a o
es g ~.
        - V.
a
e' a                                                 - - -                      .-
, o
- V.
e' a


d 4
d 4
j Appendix D - Contract Forms s
j Appendix D - Contract Forms
            )
)
a r
s a
                                                        ~
r
t                           e               e 4
~
t e
e 4
J i
J i
l 4
l 4
1 l
1 l
e       - --- -
e w
: j. ,
w-w-
:)
 
      <g
j.
            ,,a s.
,:)
<g
,,a s.
N
N
          ;O                       TECHNICAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
;O TECHNICAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
          ^
^
        .i
.i
              .]               AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT COMPLETION SERVICES
.]
        .i fj 8   >
AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT COMPLETION SERVICES
    "3                       (These Contract Forms are Considered
. i fj 8
          '$;                  Proprietary By The Bechtel Power 1l                       Corporation) ha
"3 (These Contract Forms are Considered Proprietary By The Bechtel Power 1l Corporation) ha lb
      ?
?
lb i,-
i,-
z 0
z 0
: 4. i
4.
      $          1 4
i 1
h v.q n
4h v.q n
DO
D O
.,x q3
.,x q3
'?)
'?)q Al 2
:  q   Al 2
.e,?
    .e,?
'a s
    'a s   .
7 N
7 N
em 9
em 9
Line 1,681: Line 2,555:
r>
r>
CG&E - BECHTEL OFF-SITE MEETINGS 4.
CG&E - BECHTEL OFF-SITE MEETINGS 4.
DATE                                                                                         ATTENDEES
DATE ATTENDEES
                . November 5,               1982                                         CG&E         - Messrs. Dickhoner, Borgmann,
. November 5, 1982 CG&E
                                                                                                            & Sylvia Bechtel - Messrs. Murowski, Wahl, & Henry
- Messrs. Dickhoner, Borgmann,
    -              November 8, 1982                                                       CG&E         - Mr. Borgmann Bechtel - Messrs. Wahl, Henry, & Trommerhauser
& Sylvia Bechtel - Messrs. Murowski, Wahl, & Henry November 8, 1982 CG&E
.                                                                                                                                                                        t November 19, 1982                                                       CG&E         - Mr. Dickhoner Bechtel - Messrs. Henry and Jones November 24, 1982                                                       CG&E         - Mr. Borgmann Bechtel - Mr. Trommerhauser e'
- Mr. Borgmann Bechtel - Messrs. Wahl, Henry, & Trommerhauser t
December 17, 1982                                                       CG&E         - Mr. Dickhoner Bechtel.- Mr. Jones November 17, 1982                                                       Joint Meeting - NRC Region III Bechtel CG&E f
November 19, 1982 CG&E
- Mr. Dickhoner Bechtel - Messrs. Henry and Jones November 24, 1982 CG&E
- Mr. Borgmann Bechtel - Mr. Trommerhauser e'
December 17, 1982 CG&E
- Mr. Dickhoner Bechtel.- Mr. Jones November 17, 1982 Joint Meeting - NRC Region III Bechtel CG&E f
I f
I f
* d
* d m.,
    . m.,     t .- , , , , , , , . .      , _      ,.e... , . . , . _ , _ ~ . _ . . . . , ~ . , , . . ,  ,,z. _..,-,n-_.,..y.         _ , --., ---m,......,..,,,,,..w.
t
,.e...
,..,. _, _ ~. _.
..., ~.,
,,z.
_..,-,n-_.,..y.
---m,......,..,,,,,..w.


SITE .VI'iITS BY. BECHTEL' PERSONNEL AT THE WM. H. ZIMMER NUCLEAR POWER- STATION November 15, 1982                           November 19, 1982,
SITE.VI'iITS BY. BECHTEL' PERSONNEL AT THE WM. H. ZIMMER NUCLEAR POWER-STATION November 15, 1982 November 19, 1982,
                                                          .D. Stover C. Rixford                               -R. Soderholm R.;Soderholm                               G. Stanley
.D.
              .D. Stover-J. Trommerhauser:                           December 2, 1982
Stover C.
_R. Scott J. Walker                                   G. Stanley.
Rixford
R. K. Vassar                               R. Scott C. Turnbow                                 R. Soderholm       !
-R. Soderholm R.;Soderholm G. Stanley
G. W. Stanley                               L. Campbell L.-L. Campbell                             W. Brown
.D.
              ..G. Jones Decembe'r 9, 1982 November 16, 1982 G. Stanley G. Jones                                   R. Soderholm C. Turnbow                                 D. Stover D. Stover                                   G. Jones R..Soderholm                               R. Scott C. Rixford.                                 M.-White L. Campbell                               M. Krupa R. Scott J.EWa lker-                               December 10, 1982 l G. Stanley G. Stanley November 17, 1982                         R. Scott D. Stover L. Campbell                               R. Soderholm R. Scott                                   G. Jones
Stover-J. Trommerhauser:
: 13. Stanley.                                 M. White J. Walker-                                 M. Krupa W. Henry
December 2, 1982
: 13. Jones                                   December 13, 1982 C. Rixford R. Soderholm                               G. Jones D. Stover                                   M. Krupa G. Stanley November 18, 1982                           D. Stover M. White L. Campbell-                               R. Scott W._ Henry.
_R. Scott J. Walker G.
G. Jones                                   December 14, 1982 R. Scott R. Soderholm                               G. Jones G. Stanley                                 G. Stanley D. Stover                                   D. Stover
Stanley.
              'C. Turnbow                                 R. Scott J. Walker                                   M. White           l M. Krupa Page 1 of 2
R. K. Vassar R. Scott C. Turnbow R. Soderholm G. W. Stanley L. Campbell L.-L. Campbell W. Brown
..G.
Jones Decembe'r 9, 1982 November 16, 1982 G. Stanley G.
Jones R.
Soderholm C. Turnbow D.
Stover D.
Stover G. Jones R..Soderholm R. Scott C.
Rixford.
M.-White L. Campbell M. Krupa R. Scott J.EW lker-December 10, 1982 l
a G. Stanley G. Stanley November 17, 1982 R. Scott D.
Stover L. Campbell R. Soderholm R. Scott G.
Jones
: 13. Stanley.
M. White J. Walker-M. Krupa W. Henry
: 13. Jones December 13, 1982 C.
Rixford R. Soderholm G. Jones D.
Stover M. Krupa G. Stanley November 18, 1982 D.
Stover M. White L. Campbell-R.
Scott W._ Henry.
G. Jones December 14, 1982 R.
Scott R. Soderholm G. Jones G. Stanley G.
Stanley D. Stover D.
Stover
'C. Turnbow R. Scott J. Walker M. White l
M. Krupa Page 1 of 2


r-e, <>
r-e, SITE VISITS BY BECHTEL PERSONNEL AT THE WM.
SITE VISITS BY BECHTEL PERSONNEL AT THE WM. H. ZIMMER NUCLEAR POWER STATION (Continued)
H.
        -December 15, 1982                         December 20, 1982' D. Stover                                 G. Stanley R. Scott                                 J. Baramyi M. White R. Soderholm                             December 21, 1982 G. Jones M. Krupa                                   G. Stanley G. Stanley                               J. - Baramyi December 16, 1982                         December 22, 1982 G.. Jones                                 G. Stanley M. Krupa R. Scott R. Soderholm G. Stanley D. Stover M. White P. Dallas December 17, 1982 R. Scott G. Stanley D. Stover M. Krupa R. Soderholm M. White P. Dallas Page 2 of 2
ZIMMER NUCLEAR POWER STATION (Continued)
-December 15, 1982 December 20, 1982' D. Stover G. Stanley R. Scott J. Baramyi M. White R. Soderholm December 21, 1982 G.
Jones M. Krupa G. Stanley G.
Stanley J. - Baramyi December 16, 1982 December 22, 1982 G.. Jones G.
Stanley M.
Krupa R.
Scott R. Soderholm G. Stanley D.
Stover M. White P. Dallas December 17, 1982 R.
Scott G. Stanley D.
Stover M. Krupa R. Soderholm M. White P. Dallas Page 2 of 2


g=
g=
m Bechtel Power Corporation 777 East Eisenhower Parkway                           <
m Bechtel Power Corporation 777 East Eisenhower Parkway Ann Arbor, Michigan
                                                                                                                    ~
~
Ann Arbor, Michigan Mad Address: P.O. Box 1000, Ann Arbor. Michigan 48106 RECEIVED         #    @),
Mad Address: P.O. Box 1000, Ann Arbor. Michigan 48106 RECEIVED @),
W. I. 9tCHOIll December 29, 19         12 J Att 3 GB3i i
W. I. 9tCHOIll December 29, 19 12 J Att 3 GB3i i
Mr. William H. Dickhoner, President                                         ng Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company                                           RDUME T&.
Mr. William H. Dickhoner, President ng Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company RDUME T&.
139 East Fourth Street                                                   _
139 East Fourth Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202


==Dear Mr. Dickhoner:==
==Dear Mr. Dickhoner:==
 
Bechtel wishes to provide the following supplement to our letter proposal of November 23, 1982 in response to the request of James G. Keppler, Regional Administrator U.S. NRC Region III, by his letter of December 28, 1982, directed to Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company. Our responses are numbered to match questions directed to Bechtel within the NRC letter.
Bechtel wishes to provide the following supplement to our letter proposal of November 23, 1982 in response to the request of James G. Keppler, Regional Administrator U.S. NRC Region III, by his letter of December 28, 1982,
Item B Questions Directed to Bechtel Power Corporation.
  '        directed to Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company. Our responses are numbered to match questions directed to Bechtel within the NRC letter.
Item B.1 Paragraph E of the Bechtel November 23, 1982 Revised Proposal listed key people to be interviewed. This list was intended to be a minimal listing or starting point regarding the personnel to be interviewed. Therefore, amend paragraph to add, "In the conduct of a review of the Zimmer project to determine measures needed to ensure that construction of the Zimmer plant can be completed in conformance with the Commission's regulations and construction permits, it is Bechtel's intent to interview NRC personnel directly involved in the Zimmer project. We will also l
Item B     Questions Directed to Bechtel Power Corporation.
interview National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vecsel Inspectors to identify existing procedural or construction deficiencies which must be resolved by management. Other competent individuals who may have direct knowledge or insight into management, organizational, quality assurance, or construction activities, will be sought out to provide background information r
Item B.1   Paragraph E of the Bechtel November 23, 1982 Revised Proposal listed key people to be interviewed. This list was intended to be a minimal listing or starting point regarding the personnel to be interviewed. Therefore, amend paragraph to add, "In the conduct of a review of the Zimmer project to determine measures needed to ensure that construction of the Zimmer plant can be completed in conformance with the Commission's regulations and construction permits, it is Bechtel's intent to interview NRC personnel directly involved in the Zimmer project. We will also l                     interview National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vecsel Inspectors to identify existing procedural or construction deficiencies which must be resolved by management. Other competent individuals who may have direct knowledge or insight into management, organizational, quality assurance, or construction r                      activities, will be sought out to provide background information l
l for assessing recommended corrective actions".
for assessing recommended corrective actions".
I Paragraph C.1 of the Bechtel Revised Proposal dated November 23, 1982 revised to include item (h) "wherein the review team will j
I Paragraph C.1 of the Bechtel Revised Proposal dated November 23, 1982 revised to include item (h) "wherein the review team will j                     review identified construction and quality assurance deficiencies to determine if they are attributable to or related to management".
review identified construction and quality assurance deficiencies to determine if they are attributable to or related to management".
Item B.2   The team's " management review" report will be first critiqued by the functional management located in the Bechtel Ann Arbor office. In the Bechtel method of operation, the management I
Item B.2 The team's " management review" report will be first critiqued by the functional management located in the Bechtel Ann Arbor office. In the Bechtel method of operation, the management I
r
r


(   .n l
(
.n l
Bechtel Power Corporation Mr. William H. Dickhoner December 29, 1982 Page Two review team works independently of the functional management in Ann Arbor and therefore, this would be an objective review bringing to bear a wide range of nuclear engineering, construction and quality assurance experience.
Bechtel Power Corporation Mr. William H. Dickhoner December 29, 1982 Page Two review team works independently of the functional management in Ann Arbor and therefore, this would be an objective review bringing to bear a wide range of nuclear engineering, construction and quality assurance experience.
In addition, the report would be reviewed by the Bechtel Fcwer Management (BPM). This group is independent of the various divisions and reports directly to the President of Bechtel Power Corporation. This is a very significant review in that the reviewers are experienced, senior people and will have the background of similar work being done by all the Bechtel Power divisions. This final review should indicate any areas of the report needing additional emphasis and support, its general applicability and validity.
In addition, the report would be reviewed by the Bechtel Fcwer Management (BPM). This group is independent of the various divisions and reports directly to the President of Bechtel Power Corporation. This is a very significant review in that the reviewers are experienced, senior people and will have the background of similar work being done by all the Bechtel Power divisions. This final review should indicate any areas of the report needing additional emphasis and support, its general applicability and validity.
Item B.3   Affidavits are being assembled - personnel have been contacted and will sign.
Item B.3 Affidavits are being assembled - personnel have been contacted and will sign.
Item B.4   The following is provided as further information on the role of Mr. Soderholm during his direct involvement with the Midland Project:
Item B.4 The following is provided as further information on the role of Mr. Soderholm during his direct involvement with the Midland Project:
a)   March 1980 to February 1981 - Mr. Soderholm joined the Ann Arbor Power Division as field cost scheduling supervisor.
a)
As stated in his resume, he was responsible for all planning, scheduling and cost control programs at the Midland site. He held no responsibilities in activities covered by 10CFR50 Appendix B. In this capacity there were no construction or quality assurance related deficiencies identified in his area of responsibility, b)   February 1981 to September 1982 - Mr. Soderholm was promoted in February 1981 to the position of project superintendent -
March 1980 to February 1981 - Mr. Soderholm joined the Ann Arbor Power Division as field cost scheduling supervisor.
services. In this position he managed such non-safety related activities as cost and scheduling, office services, finance and accounting, construction safety, and personnel. ,
As stated in his resume, he was responsible for all planning, scheduling and cost control programs at the Midland site. He held no responsibilities in activities covered by 10CFR50 Appendix B.
In this capacity there were no construction or quality assurance related deficiencies identified in his area of responsibility, b)
February 1981 to September 1982 - Mr. Soderholm was promoted in February 1981 to the position of project superintendent -
services. In this position he managed such non-safety related activities as cost and scheduling, office services, finance and accounting, construction safety, and personnel.
He also managed three safety related areas covered by quality assurance programs:
He also managed three safety related areas covered by quality assurance programs:
: 1)   Subcontract Administration - This area included administration of the contractual bonds between the Midland Project and such subcontractors as B&W, Zack, and U.S. Testing,
1)
: i.                  .
Subcontract Administration - This area included administration of the contractual bonds between the Midland Project and such subcontractors as B&W, Zack, and U.S. Testing, i.


1
1
/-
/-
Bechtel Power Corporation l
Bechtel Power Corporation l
l Mr. William H. Dickhoner December 29, 1982 Page Three
Mr. William H. Dickhoner December 29, 1982 Page Three a.
: a. In this time frame, B&W, and U.S. Testing have had a minimum of quality assurance related deficiencies, none of which were attributable to Mr. Soderholm's subcontract administration. QA controls of these subcontractors are provided by the utility (CPCo),
In this time frame, B&W, and U.S. Testing have had a minimum of quality assurance related deficiencies, none of which were attributable to Mr. Soderholm's subcontract administration. QA controls of these subcontractors are provided by the utility (CPCo),
: b. Zack had had problems in the past which eventually resulted in a Civil Penalty assessed against CPCo. Mr. Soderholm was given his assignment-approximately one month after the Civil Penalty and was instrumental in establishing more effective control of HVAC activities which included the licensee taking responsibility for all QA/QC activities about mid-1981. This area has since been related as a Category I in the NRC Region SALP Report issued in April 1982.
b.
: 2) Field Procurement - This area included routine field procurements of materials not controlled through the normal Midland Project procurement operation in Ann Arbor, performance of receipt inspections for count and damage (not quality control inspection) and management of storage areas. No major problems were identified in areas under Mr. Soderholm's responsibility. NRC Region III Reports 50--329 and 330/81-08 describe several   '
Zack had had problems in the past which eventually resulted in a Civil Penalty assessed against CPCo.
storage conditions but these areas were under control of construction maintenance engineers rather than field procurement. A July 1982 special memo from Resident Inspector R. J. Cook to R. F. Warnick again described storage condition problems but without identification of examples. It is believed that the 1981 report was the primary reference.
Mr. Soderholm was given his assignment-approximately one month after the Civil Penalty and was instrumental in establishing more effective control of HVAC activities which included the licensee taking responsibility for all QA/QC activities about mid-1981. This area has since been related as a Category I in the NRC Region SALP Report issued in April 1982.
: 3)   Document Control - Mr. Soderholm was also responsible for administrative services which included control and issuance of design documents from a central document control center. This area was established with a continual self-auditing function to monitor its activities which resulted in excellent control and identification of only minor deficiencies during his tenure. An NRC inspection performed in the last several months is expected to note one deficiency but the report has yet to be received.
2)
Field Procurement - This area included routine field procurements of materials not controlled through the normal Midland Project procurement operation in Ann Arbor, performance of receipt inspections for count and damage (not quality control inspection) and management of storage areas. No major problems were identified in areas under Mr. Soderholm's responsibility. NRC Region III Reports 50--329 and 330/81-08 describe several storage conditions but these areas were under control of construction maintenance engineers rather than field procurement. A July 1982 special memo from Resident Inspector R. J. Cook to R. F. Warnick again described storage condition problems but without identification of examples. It is believed that the 1981 report was the primary reference.
3)
Document Control - Mr. Soderholm was also responsible for administrative services which included control and issuance of design documents from a central document control center. This area was established with a continual self-auditing function to monitor its activities which resulted in excellent control and identification of only minor deficiencies during his tenure. An NRC inspection performed in the last several months is expected to note one deficiency but the report has yet to be received.
b
b


(                                                ,~         .  .        .  .  -    -
,~
          ..                              3
(
_    / ..
/
k                             ~
3 k
                                                              /
/
Bechtel Power Corporation ,
Bechtel Power Corporation,
Mr. William H. Dickhoner December 29, 1982 Page Four                                   -
~
                                                                .L f
Mr. William H. Dickhoner December 29, 1982 Page Four
                        .c)   September 1982 to date - Mr. Soderholm was. transferred from the Midland Site to Ann Arbor where he assumed responsibilities as the[ Technical Services Manager -
.L f
.c)
September 1982 to date - Mr. Soderholm was. transferred from the Midland Site to Ann Arbor where he assumed responsibilities as the[ Technical Services Manager -
Projects, a division position providing technical guidance and salary administration for Midland Project Cost and Schedule Engineers. No Construction or Quality Assurance functions are related to this position.
Projects, a division position providing technical guidance and salary administration for Midland Project Cost and Schedule Engineers. No Construction or Quality Assurance functions are related to this position.
Item C.1     Bechtel was contacted by CG&E prior to the Order to Show Cause to perform an assessment of the project and to subsequently assume a management role to assist the licensee in the management of the
Item C.1 Bechtel was contacted by CG&E prior to the Order to Show Cause to perform an assessment of the project and to subsequently assume a management role to assist the licensee in the management of the
                        .Zimmer project. As a result of this contact, an agreement was reached and Bechtel assembled an experienced team from throughout the Bechtel organization. The purpose of this team was to establish the conditions that exist in the various discipline areas, i.e., QA, engineering, construction, at this stage of the construction.. Specific emphasis would be placed on the identified quality problem areas, programs in place to resolve these areas and their impact on planning for the completion of             ,
.Zimmer project. As a result of this contact, an agreement was reached and Bechtel assembled an experienced team from throughout the Bechtel organization. The purpose of this team was to establish the conditions that exist in the various discipline
the project. In addition, the relationships between the various subcontractors was to be looked into. This degree of involvement was considered vital before Bechtel could commit to a course of action either as the independent reviewer or to assume the follow-on role in assisting in managing the project. This was explained in some detail in W. H. Dickhoner's (CG6E) letter of l                         November 10, 1982.
: areas, i.e., QA, engineering, construction, at this stage of the construction.. Specific emphasis would be placed on the identified quality problem areas, programs in place to resolve these areas and their impact on planning for the completion of the project. In addition, the relationships between the various subcontractors was to be looked into. This degree of involvement was considered vital before Bechtel could commit to a course of action either as the independent reviewer or to assume the follow-on role in assisting in managing the project.
I L                         The Bechtel team arrived to perform this function on tha first working day after the Order was effective. It was a mutual
This was explained in some detail in W. H. Dickhoner's (CG6E) letter of l
                        ' CG&E/Bechtel decision at that time that the proposed Bechtel review included all of the essential elements contained in the Order and should continue. The Bechtel site presence was
November 10, 1982.
(                         diminished'when it was considered that they had sufficient
I L
;                        information to complete the initial assessment of the project and to recommend a course of action. In as much as CG&E and Bechtel
The Bechtel team arrived to perform this function on tha first working day after the Order was effective.
!.                      had independently and voluntarily agreed to a review similar to l-                       that set forth in the Order, we do not believe that Bechtel's objectivity has or will be affected. W. H. Dickhoner's (CG&E) letter of November 26, 1982 to Region III supports this position
It was a mutual
        ,,              in greater detail.
' CG&E/Bechtel decision at that time that the proposed Bechtel review included all of the essential elements contained in the Order and should continue. The Bechtel site presence was
l
(
                                                    ./                                             1
diminished'when it was considered that they had sufficient information to complete the initial assessment of the project and to recommend a course of action.
In as much as CG&E and Bechtel had independently and voluntarily agreed to a review similar to l-that set forth in the Order, we do not believe that Bechtel's objectivity has or will be affected.
W. H. Dickhoner's (CG&E) letter of November 26, 1982 to Region III supports this position in greater detail.
./
1


(..
(..
    ';                                                          Bechtel Power Corporation G
Bechtel Power Corporation G
Hr. William H. Dickhoner December 29, 1982 Page Five Bechtel's independence and objectivity is further ensured by the fact that we are a national engineer / constructor involved in all phases of nuclear power plant design and construction. The
Hr. William H. Dickhoner December 29, 1982 Page Five Bechtel's independence and objectivity is further ensured by the fact that we are a national engineer / constructor involved in all phases of nuclear power plant design and construction. The extent of our involvement is shown in Appendix C of Bechtel's submittal of November 23, 1982 and represents 90 plants.
.                  extent of our involvement is shown in Appendix C of Bechtel's submittal of November 23, 1982 and represents 90 plants.
Bechtel's corporate QA program and supporting work procedures have been subject to the scrutiny of the NRC, many utility organizations and applicable national and state code boards. Of equal importance is our established reputation for maintaining high ethical standards. Bechtel's recommendations will be based on the facts discovered and on our professional integrity and experience in the nuclear industry.
Bechtel's corporate QA program and supporting work procedures have been subject to the scrutiny of the NRC, many utility organizations and applicable national and state code boards. Of equal importance is our established reputation for maintaining high ethical standards. Bechtel's recommendations will be based on the facts discovered and on our professional integrity and experience in the nuclear industry. In addition, the approved         r-action plan will be subject to continuing review and approval of the NRC. The matter of independence was also covered in detail in the Bechtel proposal of November 23, 1982 submitted to CG&E.
In addition, the approved r-action plan will be subject to continuing review and approval of the NRC. The matter of independence was also covered in detail in the Bechtel proposal of November 23, 1982 submitted to CG&E.
Sincerely yours,                   >
Sincerely yours, Howard W. Wahl Vice President & General Manager HWW/cf 1
Howard W. Wahl Vice President & General Manager HWW/cf 1
i 1
i 1
          .            ,    -  . , . .  . - -          - - . - - . - ,.}}
,.}}

Latest revision as of 01:17, 21 December 2024

Responds to Requesting Supplemental Info to Requesting Approval for Bechtel to Conduct Independent Review of Plant Mgt.Assessment Program Includes Issues Covered in 821112 Order to Show Cause
ML20023D079
Person / Time
Site: Zimmer
Issue date: 01/03/1983
From: Dickhoner W
CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To: James Keppler
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
References
NUDOCS 8305190190
Download: ML20023D079 (67)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:,. Q L t3D-55'6 a p 1'. f THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY sK CINCINN AT1. OHIO 45201 W. H. DICKHON ER January 3, 1983 PRINCIPAL STAFF hj A U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission D/RA I isc [ Region III W1 jgnf'.;; 799 Roosevelt Road Ofs,PQ MAO () Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 25L'El !RO i OEciP f J j Attention: Mr. James G. Keppler '4 L i l J Regional Administrator OL l FILE l Gentlemen: Re: Wm. H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 Order to Shaw Cause and Order Immediately Suspending Construction, Docket No. 50-358, Construction Permit No. CPPR-88, W.O.

57300, Job E-5590 - Supplemental Information Requested By Your Letter of December 28, 1982 This is in response to your letter of December 28, 1982 requesting supplemental information to my letter of November 26, 1982, in which we requested the approval of the Bechtel Power Corporation (Bechtel) to conduct the independent review of the management of the Zimmer Project.

We would like to provide the requested information in the same general order and format, as follows: l A.l. The only document we have related to our plans to utilize Bechtel as outlined in my letter of November 10, 1982 to l the NRC Commissioners, is a proposal submitted by Bechtel with a transmittal letter dated November 8, 1982. A copy of this original submittal, less contract terms and conditions which we and Bechtel deem proprietary, as well as a copy of the transmittal letter is enclosed. You will note that the original proposal is essentially the one submitted with my letter to you dated November 26, ^ 1982. Also enclosed is a tabulation of the meetings held l between CG&E and Bechtel as well as a tabulation of the site visits by Bechtel employees to date. Your request under this particular item also included some discussion of any oral understandings that we might have relative to utilizing Bechtel as outlined in my. November 10, l 1982 letter to the Commissioners. As I indicated in my l letter of November 26, 1982 to you, we had concluded prior to the issuance of the Show cause Order that additional i project management expertise should be brought to the 8305190190 830103 g,, tgfj,7g{,Splab - JA N 4 1983 i PDR ADOCK 05000358 A PDR b

e f _U. S. Nuclear Regulatory' Commission Attns LMr. James.G. Keppler ~Page~2 January 3,.1983 Zimmer-Project. -On November 2, 1982 we contacted, by telephone,.threeofirms, one-being Bechtel, relative to making a presentation as to their-capabilities to conduct an assessment-of the Zimmer Project management.- 'A fourth company was considered but not contacted since they had just recently done work for us. Bechtel made an' initial presentation to us on November 5, 1982 and . submitted a formal proposal to us outlining a proposed program on November 8, 1982. As indicated above,.a copy of this-initial proposal is enclosed. This proposal was subsequently revised by letter dated November 23, 1982-which.was attached to my letter to you dated November 26, ~ ^ i 1982. l By November 10, 1982, we had concluded that Bechtel was the most: qualified of the companies interviewed to fulfill our needs. We indicated verbally to Bechtel that we were going to submit a letter to the Commission indicating a proposed program utilizing their services. 4 In the interim, the Commission issued the Show cause Order on November 12, 1982,' shutting down safety-related con-struction 'at : the site.. Since the assessment portion of the program outlined in my November 10, 1982 letter to the Commission was essentially the same independent review of l management requirement outlined in the Show Cause Order, ~ the decision was made to allow Bechtel to proceed with -preliminary; work. It was indicated by us to Bechtel that they would now be proceeding on the basis that approval l from the NRC'would have'to be forthcoming before any definitive contract was signed and a total scope of work ' defined. l This situation was discussed with you at our meeting on j November 17, 1982. At that time it was understood that l any work done by Bechtel prior to NRC approval was being .done at risk. It should be emphasized that there is no signed agreement ( nor formal purchase ordar issued to the Bechtel Power l: Corporation for.their efforts to date. Our verbal.under-1 standing with then 'is that if they receive approval to do (; the management assessment from the NRC, a formal agreement (. will be signed covering those services and commercial terms negotiated for any additional scope of work beyond the i initial assessment phase. In the event that for some i unknown reason Bechtel would be disapproved,' we have verbally. agreed that at that point in time Bechtel would be L reinbursed for work completed on the basis of their standard consulting rates for comparable services, i I b

r er e U.iS. Nuclear Regulatory Commission r ' Attn: Mr. James.G. Keppler Page 3 January?3, 1983 We believe that this should clarify our: relationship with Bechtel and should indicate that any work done by Bechtel to date has'not in any way compromised the NRC's approval-process. B.l.- Refer to the attached letter dated December 29, 1982 .from Bechtel for their response to this item. Note:- For clarification, refer to Appendix'A of Bechtel's proposal for Paragraphs E and C.1 which they have now revised. C.l. CG&E's Response to Item C.1: In this question you asked why any Bechtel continuing-role on the project beyond IV B (1) (a) of the Order would not affect their objectivity in performing the management assessment. We would first like to indicate that the objective of the progrmn proposed in my letter ,of November-10, 1982 and the steps outlined in the Commission's Show Cause Order of November 12, 1982, are essentially-the same; namely,'to complete the Zimmer Project in full compliance with all. applicable requirements to ensure a safe operating plant. The cornerstone of my N'ovember 10 letter and the Show Cause Order is to bring sufficient management, quality assurance, and construction expertise to'the project to implement the Quality Confirma- ~ tion Program and the= project' completion. program. The first ? step in both programs was to determine what must be done to j. the management of dhe project to ensure ~that the project i can-be completed'in conformance with applicable regulations and the Construction Permit. {- As indicated in my letter of November 26, 1982, CG&E believes that Bechtel has expertise in all required areas and firmly believes that Bechtel has the professional integrity and character'to recommend a management structure that would be the best possible one to meet the unique requirements of the Zimmer Project, regardless of the l organization

  • utilized for its implementation. 'We further l

believe. that Bechtel is the best qualified through its experience and depth of personnel to be the implementing organization, independent of any assignment to assess project management. L l ..m.

o: 'U; S.? Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Mr. James G. Keppler Page:4-January 3, 1983 Our-objective is to complete.this plant in such a manner that>it meets all applicable requirements. With this in' mind, we believe the best course of. action is 'to have the party: implementing a-program be'thelsame party pro-posing the courses of. action to be taken. Undivided . responsibility would be placed on one party,- focusing accountability, thereby best ensuring the integrity of. the completed plant.- This would have the best chance of success by not placing.a second entity in the role of i trying to implement a program that they had no responsi-bility for formulating. l To summarize, we believe that Bechtel has. superior quali- -fications in all theerequired areas' involved in completing } Eimmer. We believe that their professional integrity, as well as their vested interest in the nuclear industry, would not allow them to compromise a management assessment of what they might perceive their downstream role.on the project to be. Finally, it is the logical decision to 1 have the same party accept-the responsibility of implement-ing. a program they created, particularly when they have the total expertise of the Bechtel Power Corpacation. 1 1 You'also requested a discussion as to whether Bechtel's activities at the site to date affected their objectivity in making the management assessment. As indicated in 4 several places,.Bechtel's assignment relative to my-letter of November 10,-1982'and the Show cause order is the same 4 relative to the management assessment. Bechtel has not been-. compromised in any respect in their activities to date nor have they been given any-preconceived ideas or direction. They have been directed by myself to make a ' management assessment of the project with no reservations 4 and to mnke an honest, unbias ed, and comprehensive report based. on the L facts :as they > exist. I want1the facts-as much as the NRC and I can state categorically that CG&E has taken ~ 1 no actions that would affect the independence relative to Bechtel's activities to date that should have any affect on Bechtel's objectivity. Furthermore, at no time has anyone from CG&E discussed with any member of the Bechtel organi-zation any of their findings'or made any attempt to c influence such findings. k- 'C.l. Refer to the attached letter dated December 29, 1982 from Bechtel for their response to this item. 1 J f

P e

o

.U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Mr. James G. Keppler Page 5 January 3, 1983 I believe'the above has satisfactorily answered your supplemental request and should allow the NRC 'to formally approve Bechtel. to conduct an. independent management assessment of the Zimmer Project. Whether Bechtel was selected'just prior.to the Show Cause Order or immediately following-the Order does not place the test of independence in jeopardy as defined in Chairman Palladino's letter.to Congressmen Dingell and Ottinger. Yours very truly, THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY By W. H. Dickhoner .WHD:vm Enclosures Bechtel-proposal dated November 8, 1982 List of CG&E - Bechtel Off-Site Meetings List of Site Visits by Bechtel Personnel Bechtel's Response to Questions B and C dated December 29, 1982 k

Bechtel Power Corporation Engineers - Constructors j* Fifty Bea!e Street s San Francisco, California Mad Address: P. O.Los 3965. San Francisco.CA 909 l November 8, 1982 1 + Mr. W.H. Dickhoner, President Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company 139 East Fourth Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 ,1

Dear Mr. Dickhoner:

.} I We appreciated the opportunity, the frankness, and the cooperation of yo.c personnel in discussing the status of your project last Friday. We agree that .this is a critical time in the schedule for the completion of the W.d. Zimmer plant. The completion of your project is vital to your company as well as the future of the U.S. nuclear utility industry. Bechtel is prepared to mobilire our full capability and experience to help Cincinnati Gas and Electric complete the project. We believe that our management experience at Fermi, WPPSS, South Texas, and Diablo Canyon can provide you with the assistance your project organization needs to r'e solve the current problem areas and complete the Quality j Confirmation Program. Appendix A describes the immediate steps we would take to identify organizational, procedural, and actions that are needed. This Phase I of tha initial work is expected to take three weeks, in which time our senior people J would further design the approach and a s';af fing plan for the completion of ,i the project. Generally, those same people, upon completion of this phase, would be available to carry out the implementation of the plan. Appendix B includes the resumes of the Phase I team members. You'll find them very experienced in nuclear power plant, and particularly BWR, p ro jec ts. In y selecting these candidates, we have emphasized the need for experience in: 1. Project managei:ient and condtruction management f 2. Integrated project control .j 3. QA/QC programs 4. Construction completion, systems turnover, and startup g Ap pendix C includes summaries of Bechtel's nuclear ex pe rie nc e, whi c h, as you know, is approached by no other company, e 2u

1 1 Mr. W.H. Dickhoner, Pr:sident .f November 8, 1982 <l Pegn 2 Bechtel Power Corporation r YO Some of Bechtel's in-depth capabilities that we think are important to this M job are: 1. Construction management and direct-hire construction i k 2. Quality control programs 4 3. Project cont rol systems for integration of quality, schedule and cost priorities 4 Reactor containment expertise 5. Uciding expertise and national code relationships e / 6. Nuclear regulatory licensing expertise 1y 7. Labor relations 8. Operating power plant services In Appendix D, for your convenience we have included copies of two cont rac t 1 forms. The first is a technical services agreement which is our normal I cont rac t for studies similar to the Phase I effort. The second is the form we normally use for more broad-based support of nuclear plant projec t ( completions. This Phase II contract allows assignment of the activities that ij g~ we can foresee for successful completion of the project and allows Cincinnati \\ Gas and Electric, at their discretion to utilize any of Bechtel's capabilities tha ; may be required. L In the event that additional support services are needed after project completion, commercial terms are included that allow Cincinnati Gas and ]j Electric to use our Opera ting Plant Services organization after commercial operation for whatever help may be needed. .J I have found it useful to personally intensively review our pe rfo rmance and c ove rall projec t progres s in periodic executive review meetings with your d counterparts in other utilities. I recommend a similar program on the Zicmer j p roj ec t. Bechtel is prepered to provide expertise and resources to assist Cincinnati Cas and Electric in the successful completion of the W.H. Zimmer Nuclear Station project. We'ao have sufficient experienced personnel to accomplish it in conjunction with the project's existing capable personnel. We look forward n ? to working with you towards that end. Sincerely, I H.O. Reinsch + President ( l HOR /lsw h~ t-Enclosures cc: E.A. Borgmann .4

A s&4 f0 Y s/h'y ~ +

i. e

./ 's 4* r /!9/ o$ /f.<A/7,9,t,/. / [ /,N / si/ / 4 @,, fe / / e 8 /o/,/ \\ '~s$' "~~ sY "' O b*.4+4 r .,p;(' j,,t'/,,t:s"'/ o 8 f l,. / /e., 4, '. f ~f,$~ !,

  • l0 2

/~ ~'N$~ t $'k $~$Y f'/Y'{4 / 4f/4:':,,' /, '~ e ~ s#a /e 4, l*'"$.'+*?*l~/e, ',~ e#+!o, s,. .,fe/ j ~ s /~ f' N '/ + ! 5 4 t / o' y v j', e s j N ",. &s y e$/~$.e 4/ \\t ~ $p 4,4.t.e/f ~s f e / J \\ f 4~ '/ e*e, rs x,, ". *'/ /,/ /~~"p 8 \\ if sfl." .x..fg/pff ) N

7; Appendix "A"

  • ~

PHASE I PROJECT SURVEY

c; '

Based on our experience in providing project completion assistance on similar projects we recommend the following sequence and scope of survey activities in preparation for the overall management of the W.H. Zimmer Nuclaar Power l Station. 3 A. Management review of project organization and status of job - Has been completed for the purpose of selecting the review team. B. Assemble survey team - Complete, on standby, and immediately available i for Zim=er. 4 1 h Combined team wi.1 be backed up by senior management support and will provide proven capability in the following areas: 2 Project Management / Construction Management expe rience Recent nuclear expertise (! Project controls i Current Quality Control programs Managerial capability i ) C. Survey Tasks i l 1. Review Project Controls 1 a. Overall integration of project schedules: 1. Milestone Summary Schedule 2. Engineering, Procurement, Construction & System Turnover 4 Schedule i 3. On going QC inspection planning .i ] 4. QCP inspection /re-work schedule 3 d 5. Detailed work plans for designers, craf tsmen b. System Completion & Turnover Process c. Design change control (Use of design " Freeze" and Design Change .j PackEge approach)* y' d. Field change control e. System & Facility configuration control q f. Cost control I g. Administrative control j 2. Quality Cottrol { a. Review program for compatibility of representative .j specification, drawings, quality control instructions and construction work plans e

i. s q b. Review adiquacy cf organization, program, and staf fing. t c. Quality Control for remaining work 'l ' - 1. Review of vendor and contractor certification and j docume ntation _a m 2. Action plan for closecut of NCRs d. Quality Confirmation Program j 1. Completeness and adequacy 2. Action plan for closeout of NCRs e. Review interfaces between QA, QC, craft supervisionf field engineering and resident engineering j f. Review program for training and certification of QC, inspectors 4 _] 3. Review Construction Organization N j a. Responsibilities and reporting relationships of field ) engineers. How do they interface with resident engineers, superintendents - systems or area basis? 6 b. Who assembles quality documentation for field work. c. Cost and Schedule controls; who develops and maintains? ) [ d '. Craf t training and indoctrination for nuclear work. i e. Procurement and Warehousing controls 4. Review Nuclear Regulatory Commission Interfaces and Communication a. Does official contact point exist at appropriate, level of CG&E organization for: ![ 1. Licensing M 2. Region III i b. Is staffing level and authority adequate to provide timely respbnse of best *information with minimum impact on project operation? l c. Are appropriate people involved in NRC communication process? (e.g. Exit Int erviews) (. Who is responsible for managing timely resolution of 50.55 (e) open issues, Title 21 issues? i e. How are impacts of open issues recognized or reflected in

[ A project schedule?

3

t ,s = A ,%? ~5. R view Status of Engineering for: 3 a. Outstanding design issues not yet issued for construction, if any. 3, ? i b. Dispositioning'of'NCRs from QCP. c. Open issues with NRC licensing group (NRR). d. Status of Operati'ng License SSER, ACRS Letter, and Public 4

Hearing, s.

4 j D. Survey Process ~ 1. Interview key peoplh regarding: a. Scope of responsibility ^ ~' b. Scope of authority / Backkround and experience E c. d. - Problem Areas Ij 2. Obtain and review project procedures and reports for: I ~ Monthly progress reports for E'agineering, Procurement, j a. y Construction and Start-up l b. Scheaule and Cost fore, cast i c. ' Project Procedure Manuals for CG&R and Kaiser i, d. QA & QC Manuals (CG&E and Kaiser) E. Key People to be interviewed j l Cincinnati Gas & Electric E.A. Borgmann Senior Vice-President & Project Manager i B.R. Sylvia Vic e-Pre side nt, Startup & Nuclear Operations H.R. Sager Quality Assurance Manager 4 i J.F. Shaffer Quality Confir=ation Program Manager B.K. Culver. Construction Manager j H.C. Brinicaann Nuclear Engineering Manager J.R. Schott Nuclear Production Manager ,j J.D. Flynn Nuclear Licensing Manager i K.K. Chitkara Nuclear Service Manager Tj H.J. Kaiser M. Albertin Project Manager W. Hedzik Site QA Managet C. Stanfield Construction Manager r B. Scott Estimating & Cost Control Manager ] D. Davis QC Manager 1 H. Vitale Quality Engineer Manager l C. Power Records Manager ka r

_.~ ?l; h c1 ' NUCLEAR REGULATORY CO!CIISSION - l o, h; ~ i ry ( Resident-Inspector 4 ,j l -. s i - ;e i i SARGENT & LUNDY-a 4

y-1 1

-l - j Resident Project Engineer

e i;b

}O HARTFORD INSURANCE I ~ y -.5 Q '. : 3 Authorized Inspector i s,,F, 2. 'h r -.i l M, STATE OF OHIO ..'I, j 1 iL- . Doller a Pressure Vessel Licensing Agency. - i P6

' c' l;4 W

4 l 1 h r i [2 .,s a 1 j, 1 ! ~. f1 e - f 1 t. g. ,j '.fb l j l . 1 .. 0 1 l - !! s . I h ^[ t r l'J: I, lL . v .s. { o,'. in i

'H

{ i g o 4 k s --.,-,.r,. ..n._n,,,,,,-n.- _.__,,,,,.,,,,m, ,e,w,.m,,,-,,,r.,,,.,,,,,,.-gm

' t tt 4e a 41 t m)'d-g Hxb m Vf J f .~ tr b a s< t% 'i O i ( 1 ? g a O f .',k 'hM t k W h 1 l h v. r m

n I 5 i f Appendix B - Survey Team and Resumes 1: I 1 I } i i ? e h 1 2 4 i

I i .j Survey Team t', ) a 1 l Project Operations - George Jones

  • I i

Construction - Claude Turbow Don Stover * (Alt.) j j Project Controls - Dick Soderholm I 1 QA/QC - Bob Scott

  • Gary Stanley
  • Code - Welding Inspection

- Larry Campbell i Tom Fallon* (Alt.) [j Startup Turnovers - John Walker (part-time) 4 The survey team will be headed up by George Jones and will report to Bill Henry, Vice-President and Deputy General Manager of the Ann Arbor Power Division, 'i i

  • Available for permanent Zimmer Project Team.

1 ( l u 1i ~l 1Il .i 1 l

( GEORGE B. JONES POSITION Project Manager EDUCATION BS, Electrical Engineering, University of California MS, Mechanical Engineering, Naval Post-graduate School PROFESSIONAL Registered Professional Engineer in I DATA California Member, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Member, American Society of Naval Engineers Member, Project Management Institute

SUMMARY

'6 years: Project manager 2-1/2 years: Engineering manager 9 months: Deputy engineering manager 3-1/2 years: Shipyard commander 1 year: Deputy, fleet maintenance 5 years: Planning / production officer 4 years: Head of Piping, Valves, and p Machinery Arrangement Branch EXPERIENCE Mr. Jones was Project manager of Hope Creek Unit 1 & 2, 1,100 MW BWRs for Public Service Electric & Gas Company. He is currently managing the close out operation on Unit 2. Earlier, Mr. Jones was engineering manager for the following projects: Pilgrim 1 and 2 for Boston Edison Company; Jim Bridger 1, 2, 3, and 4 for Idaho Power & Light Company; Hope Creek for Public Service i Electric & Gas Company; and Humboldt Bay { for Pacific Gas & Electric Company. He also served as coordinator for Bechtel 4 l Power Corporation with respect to the use ~ of automatic pipe welding equipment. Mr. Jones joined Bechtel in January 1971 as deputy engineering manager for the Hope j Creek Project. i l E

GEORGE B. JONES (Cont'd) Prior to joining Bechtel, Mr. Jones was shipyard commander with the U.S. Department of the Navy'where he was responsible for all aspects of industrial operstions of shipyard activity and the supervision of 6,500 people. Mr. Jones's thirty years of naval experience includes positions as deputy in charge of fleet maintenance, planning production officer, and head of the Piping, Valves and Machinery i Arrangement Branch. REFERENCE Mr. Tom Martin Vice President Engineering & Construction Public Service Electric & Gas (of New Jeracy) (201) 430-7000, Extension 8316 i i t , 9 I f 1 1 i k l b i

l' il l, l' i 4 l 4j Lt i

  1. l

] 4 1 1 Claude Turbow 'f Resume to follow j I l I u k, 'i I l /

i. DONALD M. STOVER y =: POSITION Project Superintendent ~> EDUCATION BS, Civil Engineering, University of Maine PROFESSIONAL Professional Structural Engineer, Massachusetts i DATA Licensed to Practice, Province of Newfoundland

SUMMARY

5 years: Project superintendent 1 year: Project superintendent j 3 years: Field superintendent 3 years: Staff assistant to construction manager 2 years: Assistant manager of construction j 2 years: Construction manager j 1 year: Project manager i 4 years: Resident field manager j 6 years: Structural designer and group leader P EXPERIENCE Mr. Stover is currently project superintendent j on 1100 MW BWR Hope Creek project responsible for field supervision of services g which includes field subcontract administration. 4 f Act for field construction manager in his f

absence, f

Mr. Stover was project superintendent of 'j services in Bechtel's San Francisco Power Division assigned to the Nuclear Fast Flux i Test Facility. .t As field superintendent, Mr. Stover was re-sponsible for all construction activities. b 1 Mr. Stover was staff assistant to construction j manager responsible for coordinating construc-j tion department activities on four thermal j power stations. ~ Mr. Stover was assistant manager of construc-j tion for Acres Canadian Bechtel of Churchill j ~ Falls and he was responsible for field activities j including inspection, administration, scheduling 3 and cost reporting. 4 i As construction manager of Acres Canadian Bechtel of Churchill Falls, Mr. Stover was responsible for initial construction activities, definition and scope of major field construction j contracts and administration of active field contracts. 1 { Mr. Stover was project manager of ammonia y fertilizer complex for Bechtel Corporation. l

e t-i i DONALD M. STOVER (Cont'd) 1-3 i j Mr. Stover was resident field manager of Twin Falls Power Corporation on 4-unit l hydro plant. He prepared scope of contracts; participated in bid reviews and awards; admini-stered all site construction contracts; pre-pared cost and progress reports; commissioned 4 and turned over plant to operating personnel. y 'l REFERENCE Mr. Pete Kudless Public Service Electric & Gas (New Jersey) (609) 935-7400 i 4 1 4 ?. 3 ~> d 1 'l a b 4 i 4

I,. RICHARD W. SODERHOLM Nm.- POSITION Technical Services Manager EDUCATION BS, Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Berkeley Management Program, Bechtel 1. k

SUMMARY

2 months: Technical services manager l-1/2 years: Project superintendent 1 year: Field cost and scheduling j supervisor j 4-1/2 years: Cost and scheduling supervisor i 7 months: Assistant cost and scheduling supervisor 1 year: Staff assistant j 2 years: Corporate budget coordinator i 1 year: Senior cost engineer 2 1-1/2 years: Cost engineer 3 years: Field cost engineer { EXPERIENCE Mr. Soderholm is currently technical j services manager responsible for technical i -7 guidance and personnel administration of i division technical services personnel on j (,- the Midland nuclear project. e ] Previously, Mr. Soderholm was project superintendent of construction services for j the Midland nuclear project responsible for { managing the following groups onsite: i subcontracts, cost and scheduling, office } services, document control, fin'ance and l accounting, procurement, safety, and j personnel. i Mr. Soderholm transferred to the Ann Arbor Power Division in March 1980 as field cost i scheduling supervisor assigned to Midland l Units.1 and 2. He was responsible for all j planning, scheduling, and cost control j programs, which included productivity monitoring and control, field trending, and i preparing all construction schedules. While serving as cost and scheduling i supervisor at the San Francisco Power Diviaion, Mr. Soderholm was assigned to the Pebble Springs and Pilgrim 2 nuclear projects. He was responsible for implementing all planning and scheduling, I i 4 I

i -) I l RICllARD W. SODERIIOLM (Cont'd) { cost control, and quantity tracking q programs in the office, and for the initial 9 development of similar programs for the field. Previously, Mr. Soderholm was staff assistant to the general manager of the Thermal Power Organization (TPO). He reviewed correspondence and procurement authorizations and prepared and coordinated presentations. 3 1 s, i Mr. Soderholm was corporate budget coordinator for two years. !!e was y J responsible for coordinating overhead budgeting activities for Bechtel Group, Inc. During his tenure with Bechtel, Mr. Soderholm has also served as senior cost engineer, cost engineer, and field cost engineer. ? REFERENCE Mr. Don Miller - Midland Site Manager Consumers Power Company q (517) 631-8210 1 i i i bJ I J 1 i ) 3, 4

$l, ROBERT L. SCOTT POSITION Assistant to Manager of Quality EDUCATION Business Management General Studies, Southern Illinois University; various company-sponsored i courses such as Fundamentals of Computer Systems. Basic Radiographic Interpretation, j Effective Writing, Nondestructive Testing, and Auditor Training. 3, J PROFESSIONAL Registered Professional Quality Engineer 4 DATA in State of California; Member, American Society Quality Control .g EXPERIENCE Presently assigned as assistant to the 9 Bechtel Manager of Quality at the Washington i Nuclear Power Station (WNP-2) for Washington Public Power Supply System. Responsible for technical direction of the construction Quality Control program. s f Manager, Documentation Engineering - Bechtel j Power Corp. Assigned as consulting Documenta-4 tion Engineering Manager to a major mechanical 1 contractor at the Washington Nuclear Power 1 Station, Unit Number 2 for Washington Public ) Power Supply System. Responsible for direction i and management of a quality documentation q review and correction program, to enable j certification of records necessary for nuclear plant licensing. (1 year) Project Quality Assurance Manager - Bechtel J Power Corp. Assigned as project Duality Assurance Manager to the Grand Gulf Nuclear Power Station, two 1300 MW BWR units for 3 Mississippi Power and Light Company. Re-l sponsible for direction and control of the project quality assurance program, as well J as direction and management of project quality assurance activities. (4 years) ? i Project Quality Assurance Engineer - Bechtel Power Corp. Served as project Quality Assur-ance Engineer on the 950 MW PWR Arkansas ,) Nuclear One - Unit 2 for Arkansas Power and ~ Light Company. Responsible for direction and control of the quality assurance program, representing the project on project related quality assurance matters. (4 years) i. ri

li 1

i 1 -}. q ROBERT L. SCOTT (Cont'd) i TU j Manager of Quality Assurance - Westinghouse Nuclear Energy Systems Division. Before l joining Bechtel, was an equal partner / owner l of a steel fabrication and design company. 1 Prior to this, was Manager of Quality Assurance 8 in the Heat Transfer Division of Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Formerly was the West Coast Quality Assurance Representative .'j and Senior Quality Engineer for Westinghouse Nuclear Energy Systems Division. Responsible for source surveillance / auditing of Westing-house suppliers of NSSS components in California, Washington, Arizona and Colorado. Previously s q was responsible for quality assurance program D and records planning for Westinghouse NES quality assurance consulting efforts for a d.1 utility, nuclear projects balance-of-plant i equipment. (3 years) ^ Product Assurance Coordinator - Quality Engineering - Lockheed Propulsion Company; Unidynamics and Other. While with Lockheed ,4 Propulsion Company, was a Product Assurance 1 Coordinator involved in quality engineering 'J activities related to manufacturing planning I of Navy nuclear reactor internal (core) i components. Previous positions included j Production / Quality Engineer initiating i quality control inspection procedures for Unidynamics, St. Louis, and Manager of Quality Assurance for Scott Engineering and Welding Service responsible for development and implementation of a program to meet the requirements of MIL-Q-9858A. (3 years) %y REFERENCE Mr. Roger Johnson Washington Public Power Supply System Richland, Washington i (509) 377-2522 cxt. 2712 y .s 1 sa 1 -t .]y

)

I i s s ) G.W. STANLEY {! / l POSITION Senior Construction Engineer 4 i EDUCATION Courses at Kansas State University and Wichita State University ij

SUMMARY

2 years: Project field engineer 1-1/2 years: Systems supe'rintendent and and assistant project field engineer 3-1/2 years: Project construction quality control engineer 1 year: Staff quality control super-79 visor 3-1/2 years: Project quality control engi-neer and 1 cad mechanical q piping quality control engi-3 neer ( 5 years: Lead quality control planner i EXPERIENCE Mr. Stanley is' presently assigned as project field engineer on the BWR Grand ] /~_,' ) Gulf Power Station Units 1 and 2, 1,300 MW -jc ,) each, for Mississippi Power & Light '/' Company, responsible for supervising and 7 directing all field engineering activities. He has also served as the project systems superintendent responsible for construction 1 completion and release of systems for j startup testing. In addition, he was 1 assistant project field engineer on this l project, responsible for supervising Unit 1 ) field engineering activities. i Mr. Stanley was previously assigned as project construction quality control engineer for the PWR SNUPPS 1,150 MW Sterling Unit 1 nuclear project for Rochester Gas & Electric Corporation. i He was responsible for staffing and c supervising the field construction quality j control organization and implementing the quality control program. j Mr. Stanley formerly served as quality control staff supervisor in Bechtel's Gaithersburg office, where he supervised the quality control technical staff and 5 n 1 I

1 h a. / j G.W. STANLEY (Cont'd) y J l was responsible for the preparation of instructions and procedures, and providing 1 technical guidance to field quality control engineers. t } Prior to this, Mr. Stanley served as project construction quality control 1 engineer on the FiiR Calvert Cliffs } Nuclear Power Station Units 1 and 2, I 880 MW each, for Baltimore Gas & Electric j Company. He was also assistant project j construction quality control engineer and g simultaneously acted as lead quality g control engineer for construction testing operations. Earlier, he served as lead j mechanical / piping quality control engineer, l responsible for quality activities for the verification of safety-related mechani-4 cal and piping system installation. He also served on this project as mechanical j quality control engineer for inspecting 3 the installation of piping and mechanical )/ activities. 4 3,' Before joining Bechtel, Mr. Stanley was i associated with.The Doeing Company as j lead quality control planner. He planned and developed quality control procedures, evaluated test plans and specifications for facilities installation as well as j ground and flight test operations on the j Apollo / Saturn program, and dealt exten-sively with the quality records system. REFERENCE Mr. Tom Cloninger - Project Manager Grand Gulf Project ^ ~ Mississippi Power and Light l ) ( 6 0.'.) 4,37-8011, Extension 3784 1 5 y I 1 ,idll!} 4 1 I h

i h f,,.. LARRY L. CAMPBELL (! i i ' (s ' POSITION' Quality Control Coordinator 1 1 4 EDUCATION BS~, Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University l PROFESSIONAL. Certified Level III Mechanical Quality Control DATA Engineer-Certified Level III Welding Quality Control Engineer

SUMMARY

l-1/2 years: Lead quality control engineer 4 years: Assistant lead field weld engineer - 1. 1 year: Senior construction engineer .q 1 year: Construction engineer h 5 years: Pipefitter EXPERIENCE Mr. Campbell is currently the quality control 3 coordinator in the Ann Arbor Power Division j primarily. responsible for the coordination of activities at the Palisades and Fermi nuclear h jobsites. He provides assistance to the chief [-~s i construction quality control engineer for the )J,) remaining nuclear and non-nuclear construction k/ j quality control activities within the Ann Arbor Power Division. 1 Previously, Mr. Campbell was the lead quality o control engineer at the Detroit Edison Fermi 2 j Generating Station, assigned to the client's cons.truction and maintenance quality assurance organization. He supervised the client's quality control staff in the performance of inspection [ activities and'the preparation of program j procedures, which included quality control j instructions for construction and maintenance j activities performed by contractors or the _j client's maintenance organization. Mr. Campbell is also a con'sultant for the client on American ' Society of Mechanical Engineers Sections III, IX, and XI, and on American-Welding Society Code matters. l Prior to this assignment, Mr. Campbell was the l assistant lead field weld engineer at the Limerick jobsite. He acted as the lead field weld engineer during his absence, directing and j[~'f. N coordinating the activities of 28 personnel. He was responsible for preparing and writing tech-(f nical reports to support jobsite welding acti-vities. ) i l

i LARRY L. CAMPDELL (Cont'd) '^ f Before joining Bechtel, Mr. Campbell held various construction engineering assignments and was pro-moted to senior construction engineer at several nuclear power plants. He also completed a 4-year l pipefitter apprentice program while working at a nuclear shipbuilding company. REFERENCE Mr. Tullio A. Alessi Director of Project Quality Assurance Fermi Project Detroit Edison Company (313) 586-5513 1 d 1 A i i l i e l l ',1 e a d 4

m a a hm e_o.-_- .%in a:. -. - ma A.-_-L. _A 4--me a.-___.+m 1_.--_-_- ~ 4 .+. + 9A-e._ E6 4W __m _a_. _.h .J44-.,p.-4_A t I e i ! l. J i. - s 1. 6 1 3 e i 1 f k I = I* Tom Fallon I Resume to follow i I i

a, 4h

{ >I F I-f I 4 , 4

1 i

4 i 1

1

/ f l 3 4 4

JOHN G. WALKER g (m,2 POSITION Project Manager EDUCATION BS, Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University PROFESSIONAL Registered Professional Mechanical Engineer 9ATA in Texas Registered Professional Nuclear Engineer in California Member, American Nuclear Society

SUMMARY

3 years: Project manager 1 year: Manager of startup and operating g '{ services 6 years: Chief startup engineer 2 years: Project startup engineer 3 years: Senior startup engineer 2 years: Senior results engineer 3 years: Results engineer ? j~< EXPERIENCE Mr. Walker is currently project manager for Bechtel's work on~ Detroit Edison's Fermi 2 project. 4 [ \\ Mr. Walker was manager of startup and operating I services in Bechtel's San Francisco Power ks' Division. Previously, as chief startup engineer he had overall responsibilities for division startup operations. t As a project startup engineer on a number of projects, Mr. Walker was responsible for total plant startup activities. Previously, as a startup engineer, he was responsible for plant cleaning and flushing and power testing. t I Mr. Walker was previously a startup. engineer on the Great Canadian Oil Sands project where he provided technical direction and coordi- ,^! nation of power plant and utilities startup. t f 4 t'. rj

e i 6 JOHN G. WALKER (Cont'd) .i Prior to join'.ag Bechtel, Mr. Walker was 4

a. senior results engineer with the Texas Electric Service Company.here, as a plant operations supervi,or, he was in charge of operating person al: he also directed startup of a 550 MWe fossil plant addition.

As a results engineer, he prepared and conducted plant performance tests and worked as a shift op'erations supervisor. ] REFERENCE Mr. Harry Tauber 1 Group Vice President 'g Detroit Edison Company (313) 237-6696 <a $N i '. i -y. &+ -C i l a .1 O e T l d ( O 1

WILLIAM (BILL) GERALD HENRY 1. 1 4 -{ POSITION Vic -Presid:nt cnd Deputy General Manager EDUCATION BS, Civil Engineering, University of Washington j BMC, Business Law, University of Washington i PROFESSIONAL Registered. Professional Engineer in Alabama DATA Contractor's License (BPG), Nevada i I

SUMMARY

6 months: Vice-president and deputy i general manager i 1 year: Vice-president and manager of division construction 4-1/2 years: Manager of division con-j struction j 6 months: Deputy manager of division construction 9 1-1/2 years: Manager of construction 5 years: Construction manager 1-1/2 years: General superintendent 2-1/2 years: Project superintendent 6 months: Assistant superintendent j 2 years: Senior field engineer 3 years: Field engineer i 1 year: Design engineer i 2 years: Heavy equipment supervisor i 4 years: Equipment operator 1 EXPERIENCE Currently, Mr. Henry is vice-president 1 and deputy general manager of the l Ann Arbor Power Division. Prior to his present assignment, a J Mr. Henry was vice-president and manager of division construction for Bechtel's d Los Angeles Power Division where he Q was responsible for foreign and domestic / construction activities. Previously, 4 Mr. Henry was manager of construction for projects in the southwestern United ]j States and Southern California and, later, deputy manager of division construction. q As a construction manager in the Los q Angeles Power Division, Mr. Henry was responsible for work on the Mohave, Rancho Seco, and San Onofre units. I i

ai.' -). t 6,. WILLIAM (BILL) GERALD HENRY (Cont'd) x j Mr. Henry has had considerable field experience since joining Bechtel in 1957 as a design engineer. Beginning in 1958, he' worked as a field engineer i on the Mammoth Pool hydropower plant i in the. Sierra and the Alamitos Steam } Station gas turbine units. In 1963, l he became assistant superintendent on-the Etiwanda power plant project. From 1964 to 1967 Mr. Henry was project superintendent for Redondo Units 7 and 8, and in 1967 he was named general superintendent on the Mohave Generating Station. For the next three years Mr. Henry served as construction manager respo'nsible for Mohave 1 and 2 and Four Corners 4 and 5. 5 g Prior to joining Bechtel in 1957, .? Mr. Henry was a heavy equipment ] supervisor for the Army Corps of 1 Engineers and an equipment operator for Henry Brothers Construction 'N Company and the State Highway Department. 'v 4 4-i t =l i i (3 CJ i

l i ) 1,. m f ( l 1 l l 1 i i 1 t 1 1 l l 0 l 1 ' I!k ,}, 0 1 ! 1 i l l l a l l 4 5 Appendix C - Nuclear Experience 6 i l e l l l I I 4 lT l i ) t k I. 1 (. i v i 6 3

't 4 . I,. BECHTEL NUCLEAR EXPERIENCE I 1 This section describes Bechtel's capabilities and experience I as the leader in providing engineering and construction ser-i vices to the nuclear industry. BECHTEL QUALIFICATIONS AND RECORD IN NUCLEAR POWER I 30 YEARS OF NUCLEAR POWER EXPERIENCE e 91 NUCLEAR PLANTS DESIGNED OR CONSTRUCTED o } 73 NUCLEAR PLANTS WITH BECHTEL AS CONSTRUCTION MANAGER / e CONSTRUCTOR TOTAL CAPACITY EXCEEDS 78,000 MEGAWATTS e 1' RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT / CONSTRUCTION OF e l 25% OF CURRENTLY OPERATING NUCLEAR UNITS 1 SELECTED FOR THREE MILE ISLAND RESTORATION WORK e f SELECTED FOR PROJECT COMPLETION OF 7 UNITS CURRENTLY IN e t PROGRESS l LEADER IN DEVELOPING AND APPLYING EFFECTIVE PROJECT CONTROL e t TOOLS FOR NUCLEAR PROJECTS f i ~ 1 4 1 t t } 4 1 4

General Nuclear Experience Bechtel has been a pioneer in the nuclear power field: first 4 was the nuclear accelerator at Los Alamos, New Mexico, then came Arco, proving that power-generating atomic heat could be produced, controlled, and used. In the following year, the company performed the engineering for the Mark I and Mark II Materials Testing Accelerator Project in Livermore, California. Next, it constructed the $20 million AEC Chemical Fuel Processing t Plant in Idaho. I Bechtel provided construction management and engineering for the installation of a turbine generator at General Electric Company's Knolls' Atomic Laboratory in West Milton, New York. 3 This installation, utilizing byproduct energy from the proto-type reactor for the U.S. Navy submarine Sea Wolf, supplied the first nuclear-fueled power for commercial use in 1955. v f Also for General Electric, near Pleasanton, California, Bechtel had complete responsibilities from engineering through construc-2 tion of the Vallecitos Atomic Laboratory. Vallecitos, as an j experimental facility, made its greatest contribution by demon- { strating increasing efficiency and output, and thus reducing cost of nuclear power. 4 i A milestone in Bechtel's growth with the nuclear industry came in 1959 with completion of the Commonwealth Edison Company's j Dresden Nuclear Power Station in Morris, Illinois. This was j the country's first large, privately financed nuclear power i plant. Bechtel was engineer-constructor, responsible for all construction and design, except for the nuclear package. l I j Through these, and other projects, Bechtel has maintained its position within this rapidly evolving industry with participa-g tion in many advanced projects involving studies, evaluations, 1 4 engineering, and construction milestones. Some highlights of l these activities are: o i Comprehensive design and construction services for first i e nuclear addition to a conventional steam plant, Humboldt Bay 3. Engineering' services for the first nuclear power unit with '8 e a pressure suppression containment - APPR-lA. 4 Development and construction of the first fully prestressed, e post-tensioned concrete containment vessel - Palisades 1. i Comprehensive design and construction services for the first o nuclear power plant with a field fabricated reactor vessel - Monticello 1. J India's Engineering, procurement and construction of Tarapur, e g [ first commercial nuclear power plant. This required extensive j training of workers and close supervision of local subcontractors. g a

k* O High T2mparctura Gac Cooled Raactor Plant Studies and j Designs. i Standardized Nuclear Unit Power Plant System. e e Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor Program, Fast Flux Test s o Facility Engineering and Construction. o Engineering and Construction of San Onofre Units 2 and 3 with seismic design criteria of 0.66G, one of the world's highest. ) Bechtel has experience with nearly all types of reactor design and power concepts. Bechtel is not associated permanently with d, any manufacturer or agency but works with all major worldwide l suppliers of nuclear steam supply systems and turbine generators. f Today, in its third decade of service to the nuclear industry, Bechtel has participated in the design engineering and/or con-struction of 91 major nuclear plants in the United States and d worldwide. The total capacity of these projects is in excess of 78,000 megawatts. j i '4any technical and economic studies, safety analyses, licensing preparations anci presentations for state of the art and advanced fission and fusion nuclear power plants, and the nuclear fuel cycle from mining to waste storage have been performed and j completed. For example, a study was completed concerning the licensability in the United States of the French Phenix, fast a breeder ~ reactor. Other studies have covered spent fuel pool h expansions, temporary and permanent waste storage, and recovery of Three Mile Island Unit 2. i 3 I 1 a J t tk

Nuclear Plant Construction Management / Construction Experience Bechtel's nuclear plant construction experience dates back to 1950. Since then Bechtel has been responsible for the construc-tion of 73 nuclear units. Our involvement has ranged from projects when we were the construction manager only with all work being performed by contractors to assignments where virtually all of the work was performed directly by Bechtel. Most projects included a combination of the above. Substantial work is performed by Bechtel forces (+ 60%). The remaining work is performed by specialty contractors with Bechtel pro-viding construction management services. This combination _ of experience makes Bechtel uniquely qualified in that our field engineers and supervisors have acquired a breadth of understanding of both managing as well as directly performing the work. The following table taken from Kidder, Peabody & Company's March 30, 1982 " Status Report on Engineers and Construction Managers for Electric Utility Nuclear Reactorc'and Fossil Boilers (as of 12/31/81) ", depicts Bechtel's preeminence as a Construction Manager for domestic nuclear power plants. m 4 e o s

---_.,u..-,~~~.-_.----._x - - - ~. _ Engineers and Construction Managers Summary - Construction Managers, Nuc1 car Reactors, Domestic Operating \\ To Be Operated Total Manager MWE MWE MWE American El Pr Service Co 2 2,120 3 2 2,120 1 Baldwin 2 1,866 2 2 1,866 1 Bechtel 25 18,813 27 20 22,429 26 45 41,242 4 26 Brown & Root 2 1,642 2 2 2,300 3 4 3,942 ,' 3

s Burns & Roe 3

1,508 2, 3 1,508 1 C. F. Braun 1 644 1 1 644 Commonwealth Edison 2 2,100 3 8 8,936 10 10' 11,036 7 Consolidated Ed NY 1 265 1 265 Daniel 5 4,608 7 6 6,093 7 11 10,701 -7 Duke Power 7 7,678 11 6 7,310 8 13 14,988 10 Ebasco 6 4,238 6 6 6,796 8 -12 11,034 7 Georgia Power 2 1,581 2 2 2,220 3 4 3,801 2 Gibbs & Hill 1 457 1 1 4'57 J.A. Jones 1 825 1 1 825 1 Kaiser Engineers 1 850 1 1 810 1 2 1,660 1 Miscellaneous 1 52 1 52 Northern States Pr 2 1,060 2 2 1,060 1 Pacific Cas & El 2 2,190 3 2 2,190 1 Pub Serv Indiana 2 2,260 3 2 2,260 1 Pub Serv Oklahoma 2 2,300 3 2 2,300 1 Stone & Webster 7 4,854 7 5 4,458 5 12 ),312 6 Tenn Valley Auth 4 4,345 6 13 15,896 18 17 20,241 13 United Engineers & Const 8 7,148 10 2 2,300 3 10 9,448 6 Virginia E1 & Pr 1 938 1 938 1 Westinghouse 2 1,838 3 2 1,838 3 Wisconsin Pub Serv 1 541 2 1 541 l l Total 86 69,467 100 78 86,802 100 164 156,269 100 l 1 0

? Nuclear Plant Project Completion ~~x Services Experience j x Owner Unit Services j Washington WNP - 1 Project management Public Power Construction management Supply System WNP - 2 Project management l Construction management il )I WNP - 4* Project management Construction management South Texas South Texas-1 Project management Project ~ Engineering Procurement Construction management 9 i South Texas-2 Project management Engineering Procurement Construction management 4 Pacific Gas & Diablo Canyon 1 Project management j Electric Engineering + i Construction management j Diablo Canyon 2 Project management Engineering j Construction management .f Detroit Edison Fermi 2 Ccnstruction (punch listing) Company Startup

]i Maintenance 1

V s

  • Unit later cancelled.

s i I

f.g a s .g

i b

BECHTEL*S g i y* NUCLEAR PCWER PLANT g EX P ^- ~ l E N C E i, Q d ~ ^ N = " ~ ~~~ : PILGRIM 4 Commercial Reactor ] Operation Supplier Gross Bechtel Start Start j Date-Unit Client Lect. tion & Type MW Scope Engineering Construction 1988 Sayago Iberduero,$. A. Spain Westinghouse 1100 ME 1975 1977 l I PWR l 1 1987 Korea Cucl ear 8 Korea Electric Co. Korea Westinghouse 950 EPMC 1979 1980 .f g3 P/lR J j Ta wan 7 Taipower Taiwan Prelim E 1979 i Taiwan 8 Taipower Taiwan Prelim E 1979 ( Hope Creek 2 New Jersey Public New Jersey GE - BWR 1100 EPC 1974 1974 j Service E & G 3 { Ca!!away 2 Union Electric Missouri Westinghouse 1150 EP 1973 1976 PWR Pdgrim 2 Boston Edison Mass. CE - PWR 1223 EPC 1972 ISED j Vogtte 2 Georgia Power Georgia Westinghouse 1100 EP 1971 1M4 1 Southern Services PWR f 1936 I Korea Nactear 7 Korer. Electric Co. Korea Westinghouse 950 EPMC 1979 1980 PWR l Tsuruga Mitsubishi Japan Mitsubishi/ 1100 E 1977 ISEO g Westinghouse PWR Vande:los 11 ENHER Spain Westinghouse 1100 ME 1976 1977 f WIR j l Palo Verde 3 Arizona Public Service Arizona CE - PWR 1300 EFC 1975 1976 Washington B & W/W PWR 1218 MC 1972 1973 l Washingten Nuclear Power 4 WPPSS 1985 f Korea Nuclear 6 Korea Electric Co. Korea Westinghouse 950 EPMC 1978 1980 PilR )' Hope Creek 1 New Jersey Public New Jersey GE - BWR 1100 EPC 1974 1974 j Service E & G ) EnelV Electrenucleare Italiana Italy Westinghouse 950 MEC 1974 De'ayed PWR ]f] Washington Nuclear Power Washington Public Power Washington B & W/W PWR 1218 MC 1972 1973 Supply System Grand Gulf Nuclear 2 Mississippi Power and Light Mississippi GE - BWR 1301 EPC 1971 1974 Limerick 2 Philadelphia Electric Pennsylvania G E - SWR 1088 EPC 1969 1974 E-ENGINEERING P-PROCUREMENT C-CONSTRUCTION M-MANAGEMENT

3 K ]f -Ett h _ r:rg c L4 9 ,jgIh 5 % s ---, % % Q 4. b y N T4 F " [w ? Q F U T"M 3 p e ma.,gqw g ...ge::S :.*p, S5Wn: i 7' MIN N &W 2?j? W % k. ? 1.k r ATy tL Q V }QV4 ~- M .J

q t c.. 5...m t-u m.,.. #~,.+.m. _

s .s g-m. sm, -w- . s..m%.,,.>.z,._- .r s 2.:.u. nm < . ew...w..,.~w _,. m mun.ue. y KUOSHENG d C Reactor Commercial Sapplier Gross Bechtel Start Start Operation Date-Unit Client - Location & Type MW Scope Engineering Construction L h 1984 Korea Nuclear 5 Korea Electric Co. Korea Westinghotse 950 EF t.tC 1978 1930 1 PWR h Maanshan 2 Taiwan Power Taiwan Westinghouse 950 EPMC 1573 1978 PWR a Palo Verde 2 Arizona Pub'ic Service Arizona CE - PWR 1303 EPC 1973 1976 Skagit Nuclear 1 Puget Sound Power Washmgton GE - BWR 1300 EPMC 1973 Defayed a and Light .c,j fj Vogtle 1 Georgia Power Georgia Westmshouse 1100 EP 1971 1974 Southern Services PWR 14 Midland 1 Consumers Power Michigan B & W PWR 460 EPC 1968 1972 N r. { 1933 ( Maanshan 1 Taiwan Power Taiwan Westmghouse 950 EPMC 1976 1978 PSR lf Wolf Creek Kansas City P & L Missouri Westinghouse 1150 EP 1973 1977 PWR M ASCO 2 FECSA Spain Westinghouse 930 FCM 1973 1974 4 ~ PWR i PMo Verde 1 Arizona Public Service Arizona CE - PWR 1300 EPC 1973 1976 .s 1 Pebble Springs 1 Port!and General Electric Oregon B & W PWR 1260 EMC 1972 Delayed Lemoni: 2 lberduero Spain Westinghouse 930 E 1972 1974 3 PWR Susquehanna 2 Fennsylvania Power Pennsylvania GE -BWR 1095 EPC 1970 1374 ( . & Light Limerick 1 Philadelphia Electric Penasylvania GE - BWR 1088 EPC 1969 G74 3 0 Midland 2 Consumers Power Michigan B & W PWR 812 EPC 1965 1972 5 1932 Callaway 1 Union Electric Missouri Westinghouse 1150 EP 1973 1976 PWR Kuosheng 2 Taman Power Taiwan GE - BWR 1000 EPMC 1972 1975 j Grand Gulf Nuclear 1 Mississip;i Power and Light Mississippi GE - BWR 1301 EPC 1971 1974 y j Susquehanna 1 Pennsylvaria Power Pennsylvania GE - BWR 1035 EPC 1970 1574 & Light J f

i 4

E - ENGINEERiflG P - PROCUREMENT C - CCNSTRUCTION M - MANAGEMENT

F7 ',' '45c.fN)/f*y.:.L ?c7 nmo !j.+W';7.y. cd5.*c% W 1;;ct.y. $&a=f0! N .F m 3 v

k..%t.fn.:,6. ~

? g WM - m ?s h 9 m?j'MT&@e*x

  • es

$.' %sm$a1 &, p*e}i:V.'tSA &d'kl', { i ' i ': *. . ~L hhIif$hh4dthb$$nk$h..h.g{F-f 21,p .t M5 F.' f.g .. yR

b. l[#,CW by.9,ei(1.D @ f.liIk % @f [ ' $ E-A--

! {}1 n ,~ m Y,y,l g t 2 2 h. u.. f1] N:'N' i N ik YY 5b?t Y_Y d YE ~ l TROJAN ~ Reactor Commercial Supplier Gross Bechtel Start Start Operation Date-Unit Client Location & Type MW Scope Enginearing Construction ] U J1 1931 Kuosheng 1 Taiwan Power Taiwan GE - BWR 1000 EPMC 1972 1975 Lemeniz 1 Ittrduero Spain Westmghouse 930 E 1972 1974 PWR ASCO1 FECSA Spain Westinghouse 930 ECM 1972 1974 4 5 y PWR } 3 San Onofre 2 Southern California Edison California Comb. Eng. 1100 EPC 1970 1974 PWR j ,'N 2 ?'. 1980 1 Arkansas Nuclear 1 Arkansas Power & Light Arkansas Comb. Eng. 930 EPC 1970 1972 / d PWR ,( Unit 2 s Jcseph M. Farley 2 Akbama Power & Alabama Westinghouse 847 E 1970 1972 ~} M Southern Service PWR W FFTF WADC0 f or USAEC Washington Westinghouse 400 EPC 1968 1970 LMFBR ?j a 1979 ~ 9 E.1. Hatch 2 Georgia Power & Georgia G E - BWR 822 E 1970 1971 a ff Southern Service 3 g "3 de Forsmark ASEA-ATOM Sweden ASEA-ATOM 900 Advisory 1370 1973 BWR %j ] 1977 A Joseph M. Farley 1 Alabama Power & Alabama Westinghouse 847 E 1969 1972 PWR , Southern Service Davis-Besse 1 Toledo-Edison Ohio B & W PWR 906 EMC 1989 1971 A Cleveland Electric 1 Calvert Clifis 2 Baltimore Gas & Electric Maryland Comb. Eng. 281 EPC 1967 1363 PWR 3 i 1975 Trojan t Fortland Gen. Electric Oregon Westinghouse 1150 EMC 1963 1971 PWR 4,. (11 Milestor'e Nuclear 2 Connecticut Light & Connecticut Comb. Eng. S57 EPC 1968 1970 j Power Co. PWR W Hartford Electric Light Company West Massachusetts ~ 'd L Electnc Company - il ,.,....~-.,,..c.:,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,0,.,.,,.,,..,,,,

I

  • 4 n:.yCM :ik

.,., '..' 'k'k' (b' ~ l f Ih .c a,.:ff % m w.+;g... % .cv.ya;t;,wy.i WM YN&~;?!5l + a -e, ..hh u, m. ;[ 5 S. $2-).N -r-\\- 4 ?iE4$).W%h'W.w ef. %.z. M;;

=-~ ~p-

.:.(? % v..:.:. % l Y?,. g? :

1..

L ~ - - - - w E, 5,.g:. L =7

v. w L.,:..,.

m. M:k nM:-3 !: W e N. .,r,,%., h . c. ,c,p;7.r .' M..c g . a...w. _,, w.. --w$,t2d.. - L

t& 4 Q.*t;<-

.A.ib~w%,. '8 15%:. - .,v w n. v. m., - W.te.i., s%.m 1, a ? * +4Ds. ~. u.c,'.., '>..Aw,:a

Q}'

r yn ew< u; - <. w-z w~ , 7-%p.U;./ -A { 53' 5 .T. C.d*sre:A _ k'.m%: M + .,., _ c...x. m - p ~ -. ' m'" $ p;

n.w rr; -

. & p % w w y 4 :: n%@ Q-=-f2: , M- - Q

  • f? HQ. m.g.:gw%f%re.,5M,.j,9.g
  • 1 i

s s ...x m ia. W.. WW . y%%yq;x,-W.>N. 7M:i: ICV-8'T iMeish.S;/2 w.'s w a Am.w t ' ~ ** ;:G'-4.i-w*%.;5.'::':s5-p47@N n m;e--4 ~. 2?r&< M n 's&&.;e"2%,3'"s%'g@-e. M 3 v; ~ '

  • M-

,+-; i.W%t-;9.T d .i kyJ POINT BEACH i I i Reactor ) ) Comrnercial Supolier Gross Bechtel Start Start } Operatio n Date-U nit Client Location & Type f.*// Scepe Engineering Construction -l ( 1975 [ E.1. Hatch 1 Georgta Pcwer & Georgia GE - BWR 813 E 1967 1969 l Southern Service Calvert Chtfs 1 Baltimere Gas & Electric Maryland Cornb. Eng. 834 EPC 1967 1969 i PWR 1 I Rancho Seco Sacramento Municipal Ca!ifornia B&WPWR 950 EPMC 1967 1963 Utihty District 1974 Duane Arnc!d towa Light & Power Co. towa GE - BWR 588 EPC 1969 1970 f, I Arkansas thercar 1 Arkansas Pcwer & Light Arkansas B & W PWR 904 EPC 1967 1968 Unit 1 I Oconee 2 Duke Power Co. So. Carchna B & W PWR 900 E 1966 1967 4 1 Oconee 3 Duke Power CD. So. Carolina B & W PWR 900 E 1966 1967 Peach Bottom 2 PhJadelphia Electric Pennsylvania GE - BWR 1103 EPC 1966 1967 i Peach Bottom 3 Philadelphia Electric Pennsylvania GE - BWR 11CS EPC 1966 1967 1973 Point Beach 2 Westinghouse for Wisconsin Westinghouse 490 EPC 1967 1968 Wis.-Mich. Power Co. PWR { Oconee 1 Duke Power Co. So. Carolina B & W PWR 900 E 1966 1966 l Turkey Point 4 Ficrdia Power & Light Florida Westinghouse 724 EFC 1065 1967 PWR I 1972 Pilgrim 1 Boston Edison Mass. GE - BWR 658 EPC 1967 1968 Turkey Point 3 Ficrida Pcwer & Light Florida Westinghouse 724 EPC 1965 1567 f PWR 1971 Monticello Getieral Efectric f or Minnesota GE - BWR 545 EPC 1966 1967 No. State Power Co. f Palisades 1 Consurners Power Michigan Comb. Eng. 815 EPC 1966 1967 PWR v f. P #9 a s - 9 =. g en w; p q g te e P f 0 9

  • e n,=

i b.s o,7 &a x.n*7.7-i T M -W [... g_- :;fl':.?~~~ q - m 1:. w cQ / 5. ;: 7-F.u)4^*, @ vl.h.,.ggg,r.s

ys

'"'3 ~ 4 . A ; =-^^p 535EiEhs-E,$l'Sim**ph*1 'Q .r_ {85 2J 9 NO.a I e m w ~- e ($ p :53-lgdjlT~Ol? 's W C W)<?-3h&E'LY V@i'si.i;d?5&.ed:hPklN5"*f%:).2:n S5..,5~ *,.T&p "&XQi.,7p&,9 agM. <. - g :-..'.;t,s;'.*f,u;.7l.% ti? M*4. y ; 3 t % s._,s. c ,u.c @ f y; b h. *3 5lCp-M..:,... f.~,_rw * - %, l

.,=. ;

.r.,-a tR$,,@w:~::: 3 F. c.. m'.. J: m : .y m ,:J.c.54 s - 2.mJ5 s.-eWP:WE M&MG$4f:$)k_L.. --.-?M4%% 4MMy Sy:: ?.,,,?*L"49~ iC%WL$$1Ni d%h EbdficKlg.$EW<ar,3...j. - -..g. c.pe a-m ~ J c-- e.~ t-TO M $jg.x 1 SAN ONOFRE 1 1j Commercial Reactor Operation Supplier Gross Bechtel Start Start Date-Unit Client Location & Type MW Scope Engineering Ccnstruction j ~ 1 l 1970 i Point Bea h 1 Westinghouse for Wis:ensin Westinghouse 490 EPC 1966 IS67 Wis.-Mich. Power Co. PWR l j Ginna 1 Westinghouse for fiew York Westinghouse 470 PC 1965 1966 Roch. Gas & Electric PWR i 1969 i Tarapur 1 IGE f or Indian AEC India GE - BWR 190 EPC 1964 1964 k Tarapur 2 IGE for indian AEC India GE - BWR 190 EPC 1954 1964 i l 1968 l San Onofre 1 Southern California Edison California Westinghouse 450 EPC 1963 1964 San Drego Gas & Electric PWR j 1967. Peach Ect:om 1 Philadelphia Ele:tric Pennsylvania G A - HT R 46 EPC IS58 1962 4 1963 Humboldt Bay 3 Pacific Gas & E!ectric California GE - BWR 69 EPC 1958 1960 1 1961 j 3 VESR General Ele:tri: - California GE - Steam 0 C ESADA Superheater l j I 1962 } g Big Rock Point Consumers Power Michigan GE - BWR 75 EPC 1959 1960 m f;PD Canadian Canada CGE - PFWR 20 PC 1959 -j General Electric f or AECL Hallam AtoJni: Energy Ccmmission fiebraska Al - SG R 76 EC 1958 1559 i '8 1960 t Dresden 1 General Ele:tric for Illinois GE - BWR 210 EPC 1955 1957 l l Commenv.ealth Edison I' 1957 l VBWR General Ele:tr;c California GE - BWR 5 EPC 1955 1956 APP R.1 A ALCO Alaska ALCO - PWR 2 E 1954 1955 1955 West Milton General E!e:tric f;ew York GE - SIR 10 EC 1952 1953 + 1952 EBR-1 Atomic Er.ergy Commission Idaho AN L-LM F B R 0.2 M 1949 ) ' E - ENGINEERING P - PROCUREMENT C - C0tiSTRUCTION M - MANAGEMEflT i 4 4

I

~

Experienced Power Plant Engineering and Construction Personnel iI, Bechtel's ability to provide clients with specific services and j expertise is made possible by the number and diversity of experienced personnel available within the organization. .l j More than 43,000 professional, technical, and support personnel are employed by Bechtel on projects throughout the world. More j than 50 percent of these are graduate engineers. As manloading j requirements change on various projects,. Bechtel has the l flexibility to meet the needs of all the divisions of the Bechtel group of companies. Within Bechtel Power Corporation, 2 j there are more than 20,000 personnel. These include: I 55 nuclear power plant project managers 3 e i e 65 nuclear power plant construction managers 1 1 1,060 nuclear power plant planning, scheduling, and e j estimating personnel s f [p 1,000 quality control personnel

  • e 2,000 power plant field engineers e

600 power plant construction supervisors o 170 quality assurance personnel .] e 200 nuclear and environmental engineers e 4 e 2,900 procurement personnel worldwide I 3,000 project support personnel including personnel 1 e 4 qualified in ); labor relations j safety 1 1 rigging a j welding / metallurgy nuclear. licensing containment design health' physics, security ? l

  • Quality Control department established in 1970 1

I

e i. ,1, Participation in Cedes and Standards Committees i; In recognition of the important role that the National Codes and Standards program occupies in the development and applica-l tion of commercial nuclear power, Bechtel participates exten-1 sively through the commitment of experienced engineers on national codes and standards committees. A review shows that Y Bechtel Power Corporation had 105 engineers serving on 234 a committees. A breakdown of this service is shown below. An additional 40 to 50 engineers from other Bechtel organizations oy also participate in the national codes and standards program. t l Bechtel participation in codes and standards work benefits a

{

client's project in two ways. The most direct benefit is that ? the latest issues, some of which may not be published yet, can 4 ' t' be considered. Probably the most important benefit is the feed-back from actual engineering and construction work to the various El code committees. This enables consideration of special require-fl ments in the development of the industry standards required 1 for commercialization. Oe ~, Bechtel Power Corporation Participation in Code and Standards Committees Activity Number of Engineers Number of Committees ANS 24 34 t ANSI 20 35 F' ASME 28 55 ASTM 6 24 'f IEEE 28 51 Others 22 35 d fi 128*

234,
  • 23 engineers participate in committees from more than Gl one Society 4

b 'i gll e i %l .k k: 5;

1 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 2 Bechtel's project team concept requires that projects be carried out under the di-rection of a project manager who will manage, schedule, and integrate the many project activities. The project manager is the Bechtel team leader and is responsi-ble to the client and Bechtel management for the successful completion of the pro-j ject in accordance with agreed-upon. objectives. He has direct and continuing ac-l cess to the division general manager. He is Bechtel's prime point of contact with the owner, acting through whatever organizational approach the owner desig-

f. c nates.

)p At the onset of a project, the Bechtel team leader, working with the owner, estab-lishes project objectives and directs the formulation of the project plan to meet them. He ensures that the project team is appropriately staffed with qualified per-sonnel. He and his team establish the procedures and project controls to be used, i f tailoring them to the specific project and obtaining the owner's concurrence where the procedures interface with the owner's organization, procedures, and desires. n 'r He establishes strong formal and informal communications channels. not only be-tween himself and his owner counterpart but also between Bechtel-owner channels 2 at appropriate key team levels. Supporting and comp!cmenting these, he arranges 9 reporting means to give the project visibility desired by the owner and Bechtel J management. He arranges documentation of objectives, plans, and procedures and j ensures that the project technical scope and the detailed Bechtel scope af services are documented to the owner's satisfaction. The Bechtel team leader, acting through his key team members, monitors all pro-t Ti ject activities from inception through completion, adjusting the project plan as necessary to meet changing objectives or circumstances, always in concert with and to the detail required by the owner. He and his team identify departures from the plan and take appropriate corrective action. He is also the administrator of the Bechtel-owner contract and is responsible for execution and close out to the owner's and Bechtel management's satisfaction. In summary, the Bechtel team leader makes sure that the project members are working in the close rapport re-quired and that they are appropriately supported by the strength of the Bechtel .-l division and corporate resources. The project manager acts for the owner using the project management concept. He j receives directions, develops instructions, receives reports, and prepares recom-mendations to be submitted to the owner. Engineers, contractors, and suppliers receive their instructions from the project 1 manager, perform their assigned tasks. and report results to the project manager. In summary, the project management team functions as an extension of the owner's organization and acts on behalf of and in the interest of the owner to: o

  • Establish budgets, control costs. and ensure adherence to schedules
  • Manage and integrate planning and engineering work by design firms q
  • Procure major plant equipment, senices. and supplies i
  • Coordinate and manage the activities of construction supplies q
  • Supen-ise preoperational testing

^ d k

i. } PROJECT CONTROLS bp i; ) INTRODUCTION w / I I In the execution and management of large, complex projects, numerous organizations become involved in the process of design j and construction. Careful coordination of these organizations is i needed to provide the proper flow of drawings and materials to a site, and the proper sequencing of construction and startup i activities. 1 ) Fundamental to this coordination is a wide range of activities d. that include the development of a project plan, operating i policies and procedures, organization charts and responsibility assignments, and the scoping'of work segments. Equally essential ./ is the implementation of a project control system that provides consistent and accurate project status for client and Bechtel management visibility and decision making. h Bechtel, with its broad experience in major engineering and q construction projects, maintains a comprehensive library of v3 state-of-the-art cost, schedule, and material control programs a that can be modified for project uniqueness and for client i internal and external reporting and control requirements. After project and client requirements are specified and program selections made, the programs are assembled into an integrated project control system. Bechtel's project control programs are viable programs that can (} be used on projects without the need for change. They can, "I however, be modified as necessary to meet specific client or j project requirements. J SYSTEM DESCRIPTION J d The project control system is based on existing programs, but is tailored to meet specific client requirements. In general, the control system consists of: A mutually l' agreed-up~n project plan that incorporates a. o resultant schedules and cost and quantity budgets b. A monitoring plan that continually measures actual performance against the plan ]j c. A reporting program that identifies deviations from that plan i d. An action program to anti.cipate and correct project-related .l problems, and to take advantage of project-related opportunities. l 1 s

.I. s The project plan defines the scope of work, identifies services to be provided, assigns responsibilities, and identifies contrcls, methods, and procedures for reeeting agreed-upon objectives. 3 4 I The plan is modified as necessary to accommodate client require-l ments and, when mutually approved by client and Bechtel manage-ment, becomes the basis for measurement of project performance. Reports to client management indicate the status and progress a of the project and project performance. L 3 The plan is expanded, refined, and updated as required as the j project passes through the phases of design, procurement, a construction, and startup. Visibility of the plan ensures l that control can be accomplished by responsible individuals at i each organizational level for all project phases. To accommodate I this visibility, control programs are designed on a modular f concept so that each can stand alone as a control tool yet be l fully integrated into the project control system. 1 Integration of the program modules is accomplished through the use of standardized codes for activities, quantities, and cost. This coding system is an interrelated series of structured i numbers which provide a set relationship of the detailed elements i in each module to each other, to all other modules in the system, I and to the project as a whole. Individual modules can be manual f or automated depending on project requirements without affecting i ,~" module approach or methodology; this provides significant 3 flexibility in arranging the tools to support client and Bechtel j management requirements while still maintaining system integrity. 1 The project control system consists of three primary programs: j schedule control, cost control, and material control. i 1 Bechtel's standardized approach to schedule control utilizes 1 an integratcd system of computerized and noncomputerized planning d and scheduling techniques and procedures that assist the client and Bechtel management in developing a valid plan, monitoring ,j performance, and producing reports that permit redirection of 0 plan objectives to the best interest of the project. e l .Bechtel's cost control system is supported by a code of accounts which provides an overall project structure to the various estimates and budgets used to accomplish cost control. Fore-J casting is performed periodically along with a continuous j monitoring system consisting of trending, home office cost ] control, and procurement cost control. 1 4 1 -1 m d:i A M

j Bechtel provides an overview of the project scope of defining

j. c materials from conceptual quantities through detail design

'f 1 takeoff with a sophisticated and comprehensive material control I / system. Material control encompasses the identification, quantification, and status updating to provide visibility of i equipment and material scope during all phases of a project. Quantification of basic materials enables the project scope to be measured in terms common to engineering, construction, and the support services. PROGRAM SELECTION 1 i The project control system is administered by Bechtel's project manager; he is responsible for module coordination, j implementation, and updating. The modules that make up specific j programs are identified in policy manuals. The client and i Bechtel may select the most appropriate tools from these manuals, J and decide if operation of the system should be fully automated, d partially automated, or manual. The project's cost / schedule 1 supervisor, engineer, field construction manager, and startup q engineer have the responsibility of supporting the project e manager in this activity. Functional departments are responsible l for providi.ng guidance and input. FEATURES OF THE CONTROL SYSTEM ) Bechtel's fully integrated project control system is designed to h facilitate rapid solution of problems on large projects. Program 4 modules using standardized codes are linked to indicate project ]j actions.and their impact on cost / schedule and resources. Automation may be provided by a state-of-the-art management software system for the material, scheduling, and cost y processing. Visibility may be provided graphically to display q project objectives in tabular or plotted form or on a CRT terminal. The scheduling system has the capability to distribute q resources (quantity / manhours) over the work activities and to n redistribute remaining resources (using Bechtel's historical ] experience) over these activities 'as progress is reported. This y feature provides quick assessment of time and resource status and the depicting of "what-if" scenarios as rapidly as possible. Data for historical comparison can be utilized to provide . management with quick access to historical reference points so that they can more rapidly evaluate the condition of the project from a non-project perspe.ctive. Another part of the project control system is an integrated ccet <] system that can provide quantity, manhour, and cost status, j measure this status against the project plan, and report at any level of detail a comprehensive comparison to the plan and/or e historical data. h This system provides the client with access to project data in .j essentially the same manner that it is provided to Bechtel project and division management, enabling mutual participation in a d project decisions with complete awareness of project status. il ily

.:= , __ c - v= = =a_=_-.._ cm m m r =r e m a en ec-- ) -- ELEMENTS OF PROJECT CONTROL PROJECT PLAN MONITORING THE PLAN OBJECTIVE ~' PROVIDE INFORMATION TO IDENTIFY PROBLEM AREAS AND INITIATE CORRECTIVE ACTION: Material Control Cost Control Schedule Control \\ CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTING DEVIATIONS l 1 THE CONTROL CYCLE

.. ~...

w..

- ~~a ~ - ~ = + .-2--- D c em am roc r-m<n x V 3 i SCOPE 0F PROJECT SCOPE l LOCATION l SERVICES - l SCHEDULE SIZE OBJECTIVES SYSTEMS j I I I I I I l ORDER OF MAGNITUDE k i PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE DEFINITIVE l 5 .i BUDGETS ENG. & H.O. MATERIAL QUANTITY LABOR S Y j BUDGET COST BUDGET BUDGETS BUDGET 4 4 4 4-4 i CONTINUOUS COST QUANTITY INTERMEDIATE MONITORING & CEBUS TRACKING FOCUS & DETAll REPORTS I REPORTING COMMITMENT SYSTEM SCllEDULES I I I I 1 r CONSOLIDATED MONITORING, i REPORTS AND MONTHLY TRENDING ACTIONS 1 REVIEWS WITH BECHTEL AND OWNER MANAGEMENT RESOLVED l UNRESOLVED I I l h OUARTERLY ORECAST F l REPORTS CASH FLOW. l SCHEDULES RESULTS + j OWNER & BECHTEL MANAGEMENT REPORTS l l

m._.~._.._._m.m..... .~mw-nm - - - _,w - a m &_...: _ _. a. c

p.,

8 ( l'

  • t2il C"":

Q Q 7 T i_. C C CD 9 EN-1 )-- ( ,/ ~-/ N CQNSTRUCTION-ENGINEERING INTERFACE MILESTONE /~m.;>- h. m./.s - r O--c c 7 % ',- ...........4..................................**

  • a...aa...aaa..~aoa...

i ENGR

SUMMARY

j [CONST

SUMMARY

' m. d............................................................................{,. r'. w.... > A - o.., c.,4j,c /..............................................................................,*.. ................................................................................3h,%.,,.* ...........................f. c ............................................................................. y W : W / ~ / SYSTEM LOGIC /F CILITY LOGlc BY DISCIPLINE

  • / BY COMMODITY
  • ..GW ': '...':::::::l....::,..

f,. ^'l'^ ' '.'.'?

    • .......-..---.aa-..

< e[o .:.o-o + g>h..y/ .........l,,- .;:....; :::::::::::::p. / / a . '. k [."* i 5V SYSTEM I-ORIENTATION . '. PREREQUISITEj i [ d *, -- w___ . I: 3 PACKAGES FACILITY A ~= ORIENTATION DE TAIL SCHLDULE /, WHAT IS REQUIRED DE TAIL SCHEDULE .. 4 J ... ~,,.,,. / WHEN IS IT REQUIRED h-o-o o-.oc>oo [ SPEC CONTROL [ 3 MONTil ROLLING s / DWG CONTROL LOGS [ 2 WEEK DAILY [ TASK CONTROL / TASK CONTROL f / LARGE PIPE / SMALL PIPE / VALVES / INSTRUMENT / CKT & RW / CIVIL / OTHER _m.,-

mu w w. w a smm - .u ~ -:--w.w : m ~ :-w ~ ~ e-- -- a -w - -- - - - - - k T M (.

)

P Q

,w N

Q C M E v v CONSTRUCTION-STARTUP NTERFACE MILESTONE [o o. o./. O o---o--.~o..~. y -c'..-o---o, a"/ -o.. o~c o m &- s c ....... '....................................... ~ ....~ ~....~.a = =.- ~ ~.a.. CONST

SUMMARY

S/U

SUMMARY

W.., I........................................................................... g.. w h y..... 4.*.o,c'p.o c_ o. -.o o opy /............................................................................/.. ;... cMm -o gf ..........................................................................,

  • hl
--.o Q*et".g/.v............................................................................r..g.......................

cs'.- -c c..

  • ,4 o:/

/ /* FACILITY LOGIC BY COMMODITY AREA SYSTEM LOGIC i a.,sELEV BY DISCIPLINE

o-o-o n.

......-' " " " " " ~ - p*p.*o-je2 c.j:. ..:. w :- o; h............./.......... ".,....,.. -ock ---< > ,-o ~ , *........ ~. ~ ~ ~ y~ ~ m ww_ yo "a a j

  • /

FACILITY ^ . = .e k-

  • j ORIENTATION
  • A PREREQUISITE j d
  • PACKAGES SYSTEM l

S" OnlENTAllON ( DETAll SCHEDULE / WHAT IS REQUtnED .' DETAll SCHEDULE . 7..... ' ' '.,,.I.[ [WHEN IS IT DEOUinED hD PAQ ~... ., e as.. c>- O o--o W [ 3 MONTH ROLLING S/U RECAPS [ [ 2 WEEK DAILY LOGS PUNCH LIST TASK CONTHOL [ TASK CONTROL / SMAtl. PIPE / VALVES / INSTRUMENT / CKT & nW / civil / S/U RECAPS Z. Rwn s

~ ?. t

i.

Operating Plant Services i v As' Bechtel's Operating Plant Services Organization provides a complete range of services for operating nuclear plants. 3 ' j Typical services which have rec'ently-been provided at more j than 25 operating nuclear units include the following: Plant Inspections and Walkdowns e _j e Support for NRC Bulletins '^ Engineering Studies and Consultation o j Capital Improvements.and Expansions e Licensing Support e l} e Emergency Response Services ? o Outage Management t i i e Plant Maintenance e Instrument Calibrations o' Circuit Verification a Performance Tes' ting e l e. Preventive Maintenance ,s )' Spare Parts Program e -.4 / JN/ Operating Procedures and Training e 3 e. System As-Builts N 1 e Records Management 3 e' Craft Labor Services Vendor Shop Quality Surveillance e -g- ? Ii 1 a t i cl-1 (m 7- ~ - - - e,--, ,n-sn- ---w a, --.n..- a---sa, - - -,. --,- e-- e-,--,--,e - - - -,-r-m-, -,y---,

e f} [N V \\j L/ RECHTEL POWER CORPORATlON . s c e,,i -,..o..,o... .c. e, eoe, setaveosrunn amo nor necessmen y asvlas BECHTEL POWER CO,,o,ATION M7s7*s',%M""' ' "'" " H. O. Re.n ch SAN FRANCISCO g PRESIDENT $ JULY 1,1982 8hCM J. V. Motowski EL R 3 A t g R. M' froalms VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRF10 DENT & $PECIAL A$$lSTANT & MANAGER E NGINE E RING CONSTRUCTION OUALITY SAN FR ANCISCO LOS ANGE1ES GAITHER$ BURG A*fN ARBOR AND SERVICES A$$URANCE POWER OtV1580N POWER DIVISION POWER DIVillON POWER DfVISION f A. L Cohsi M. J. Mitcheit J M. An'e'el assonwAtal leasTHansevnos (asses Assong MAN.4GER MANAGER MANAGER C. D. $tatton L. G. Hmkofmesi J. M. komes H. W. Wsa.l VICE PRE 110ENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRE $1 DENT VICE PRE $sDENT & GENERAL MGR. & CENER AL MGR. & GENERAL MGR. & CENERAL MGR. ee eo P. A. HoHenbach C..W. Seamord WlG. Henry PROCUMEMENT CONTROLLER VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRE 11 DENT VICE PRESIDENT T. J. Hohe W. W. Wilson & DEPUTY GEN. MGR. & DEPUTY GEN. MGR, & DEPUTY GEN. MGR. MANAGER MANAGER HOUSTON BFCHTEL ENERGY AR E A OF F 6CE CORPOR A TION 8 'N8 (HOUSTONI J.'M.'E onnes D. W. Heilatise PR ESIDENT VICE PRE $10ENT R. H. Stone & MANAGER OPER ATOONS MGR. hlOT E: oe RECEIVES FUNCTIONAL CtrDANCE FROM THE ALL PE R$0NNE L B ASED IN HOME OF FICE APPtICABLE SAN FRANCISCO SERVICE ORGr.NIZATION g UNLE SS OTHERWWISE INDICATED % REPLACES CHARf DATED FEBRUARY 22.17c2

-.s-A a - s .--s-. 2-- 0 A r u-a.,_. g. g 4 \\ () 4 t,. 4 ei }. r, V ~< 1 l I9 y l. 'l4 s t 3. 24 hf; r k v e) o. e i k'- T -t ) j,ll <i h.

i

'%( e T 7 Il kt C es g ~. a , o - V. e' a

d 4 j Appendix D - Contract Forms ) s a r ~ t e e 4 J i l 4 1 l e w w-w-

j. ,:) <g ,,a s. N

O TECHNICAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

^ .i .] AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT COMPLETION SERVICES . i fj 8 "3 (These Contract Forms are Considered Proprietary By The Bechtel Power 1l Corporation) ha lb ? i,- z 0 4. i 1 4h v.q n D O .,x q3 '?)q Al 2 .e,? 'a s 7 N em 9 g t 3 b d w y

r> CG&E - BECHTEL OFF-SITE MEETINGS 4. DATE ATTENDEES . November 5, 1982 CG&E - Messrs. Dickhoner, Borgmann, & Sylvia Bechtel - Messrs. Murowski, Wahl, & Henry November 8, 1982 CG&E - Mr. Borgmann Bechtel - Messrs. Wahl, Henry, & Trommerhauser t November 19, 1982 CG&E - Mr. Dickhoner Bechtel - Messrs. Henry and Jones November 24, 1982 CG&E - Mr. Borgmann Bechtel - Mr. Trommerhauser e' December 17, 1982 CG&E - Mr. Dickhoner Bechtel.- Mr. Jones November 17, 1982 Joint Meeting - NRC Region III Bechtel CG&E f I f

  • d m.,

t ,.e... ,..,. _, _ ~. _. ..., ~., ,,z. _..,-,n-_.,..y. ---m,......,..,,,,,..w.

SITE.VI'iITS BY. BECHTEL' PERSONNEL AT THE WM. H. ZIMMER NUCLEAR POWER-STATION November 15, 1982 November 19, 1982, .D. Stover C. Rixford -R. Soderholm R.;Soderholm G. Stanley .D. Stover-J. Trommerhauser: December 2, 1982 _R. Scott J. Walker G. Stanley. R. K. Vassar R. Scott C. Turnbow R. Soderholm G. W. Stanley L. Campbell L.-L. Campbell W. Brown ..G. Jones Decembe'r 9, 1982 November 16, 1982 G. Stanley G. Jones R. Soderholm C. Turnbow D. Stover D. Stover G. Jones R..Soderholm R. Scott C. Rixford. M.-White L. Campbell M. Krupa R. Scott J.EW lker-December 10, 1982 l a G. Stanley G. Stanley November 17, 1982 R. Scott D. Stover L. Campbell R. Soderholm R. Scott G. Jones

13. Stanley.

M. White J. Walker-M. Krupa W. Henry

13. Jones December 13, 1982 C.

Rixford R. Soderholm G. Jones D. Stover M. Krupa G. Stanley November 18, 1982 D. Stover M. White L. Campbell-R. Scott W._ Henry. G. Jones December 14, 1982 R. Scott R. Soderholm G. Jones G. Stanley G. Stanley D. Stover D. Stover 'C. Turnbow R. Scott J. Walker M. White l M. Krupa Page 1 of 2

r-e, SITE VISITS BY BECHTEL PERSONNEL AT THE WM. H. ZIMMER NUCLEAR POWER STATION (Continued) -December 15, 1982 December 20, 1982' D. Stover G. Stanley R. Scott J. Baramyi M. White R. Soderholm December 21, 1982 G. Jones M. Krupa G. Stanley G. Stanley J. - Baramyi December 16, 1982 December 22, 1982 G.. Jones G. Stanley M. Krupa R. Scott R. Soderholm G. Stanley D. Stover M. White P. Dallas December 17, 1982 R. Scott G. Stanley D. Stover M. Krupa R. Soderholm M. White P. Dallas Page 2 of 2

g= m Bechtel Power Corporation 777 East Eisenhower Parkway Ann Arbor, Michigan ~ Mad Address: P.O. Box 1000, Ann Arbor. Michigan 48106 RECEIVED @), W. I. 9tCHOIll December 29, 19 12 J Att 3 GB3i i Mr. William H. Dickhoner, President ng Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company RDUME T&. 139 East Fourth Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

Dear Mr. Dickhoner:

Bechtel wishes to provide the following supplement to our letter proposal of November 23, 1982 in response to the request of James G. Keppler, Regional Administrator U.S. NRC Region III, by his letter of December 28, 1982, directed to Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company. Our responses are numbered to match questions directed to Bechtel within the NRC letter. Item B Questions Directed to Bechtel Power Corporation. Item B.1 Paragraph E of the Bechtel November 23, 1982 Revised Proposal listed key people to be interviewed. This list was intended to be a minimal listing or starting point regarding the personnel to be interviewed. Therefore, amend paragraph to add, "In the conduct of a review of the Zimmer project to determine measures needed to ensure that construction of the Zimmer plant can be completed in conformance with the Commission's regulations and construction permits, it is Bechtel's intent to interview NRC personnel directly involved in the Zimmer project. We will also l interview National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vecsel Inspectors to identify existing procedural or construction deficiencies which must be resolved by management. Other competent individuals who may have direct knowledge or insight into management, organizational, quality assurance, or construction activities, will be sought out to provide background information r l for assessing recommended corrective actions". I Paragraph C.1 of the Bechtel Revised Proposal dated November 23, 1982 revised to include item (h) "wherein the review team will j review identified construction and quality assurance deficiencies to determine if they are attributable to or related to management". Item B.2 The team's " management review" report will be first critiqued by the functional management located in the Bechtel Ann Arbor office. In the Bechtel method of operation, the management I r

( .n l Bechtel Power Corporation Mr. William H. Dickhoner December 29, 1982 Page Two review team works independently of the functional management in Ann Arbor and therefore, this would be an objective review bringing to bear a wide range of nuclear engineering, construction and quality assurance experience. In addition, the report would be reviewed by the Bechtel Fcwer Management (BPM). This group is independent of the various divisions and reports directly to the President of Bechtel Power Corporation. This is a very significant review in that the reviewers are experienced, senior people and will have the background of similar work being done by all the Bechtel Power divisions. This final review should indicate any areas of the report needing additional emphasis and support, its general applicability and validity. Item B.3 Affidavits are being assembled - personnel have been contacted and will sign. Item B.4 The following is provided as further information on the role of Mr. Soderholm during his direct involvement with the Midland Project: a) March 1980 to February 1981 - Mr. Soderholm joined the Ann Arbor Power Division as field cost scheduling supervisor. As stated in his resume, he was responsible for all planning, scheduling and cost control programs at the Midland site. He held no responsibilities in activities covered by 10CFR50 Appendix B. In this capacity there were no construction or quality assurance related deficiencies identified in his area of responsibility, b) February 1981 to September 1982 - Mr. Soderholm was promoted in February 1981 to the position of project superintendent - services. In this position he managed such non-safety related activities as cost and scheduling, office services, finance and accounting, construction safety, and personnel. He also managed three safety related areas covered by quality assurance programs: 1) Subcontract Administration - This area included administration of the contractual bonds between the Midland Project and such subcontractors as B&W, Zack, and U.S. Testing, i.

1 /- Bechtel Power Corporation l Mr. William H. Dickhoner December 29, 1982 Page Three a. In this time frame, B&W, and U.S. Testing have had a minimum of quality assurance related deficiencies, none of which were attributable to Mr. Soderholm's subcontract administration. QA controls of these subcontractors are provided by the utility (CPCo), b. Zack had had problems in the past which eventually resulted in a Civil Penalty assessed against CPCo. Mr. Soderholm was given his assignment-approximately one month after the Civil Penalty and was instrumental in establishing more effective control of HVAC activities which included the licensee taking responsibility for all QA/QC activities about mid-1981. This area has since been related as a Category I in the NRC Region SALP Report issued in April 1982. 2) Field Procurement - This area included routine field procurements of materials not controlled through the normal Midland Project procurement operation in Ann Arbor, performance of receipt inspections for count and damage (not quality control inspection) and management of storage areas. No major problems were identified in areas under Mr. Soderholm's responsibility. NRC Region III Reports 50--329 and 330/81-08 describe several storage conditions but these areas were under control of construction maintenance engineers rather than field procurement. A July 1982 special memo from Resident Inspector R. J. Cook to R. F. Warnick again described storage condition problems but without identification of examples. It is believed that the 1981 report was the primary reference. 3) Document Control - Mr. Soderholm was also responsible for administrative services which included control and issuance of design documents from a central document control center. This area was established with a continual self-auditing function to monitor its activities which resulted in excellent control and identification of only minor deficiencies during his tenure. An NRC inspection performed in the last several months is expected to note one deficiency but the report has yet to be received. b

,~ ( / 3 k / Bechtel Power Corporation, ~ Mr. William H. Dickhoner December 29, 1982 Page Four .L f .c) September 1982 to date - Mr. Soderholm was. transferred from the Midland Site to Ann Arbor where he assumed responsibilities as the[ Technical Services Manager - Projects, a division position providing technical guidance and salary administration for Midland Project Cost and Schedule Engineers. No Construction or Quality Assurance functions are related to this position. Item C.1 Bechtel was contacted by CG&E prior to the Order to Show Cause to perform an assessment of the project and to subsequently assume a management role to assist the licensee in the management of the .Zimmer project. As a result of this contact, an agreement was reached and Bechtel assembled an experienced team from throughout the Bechtel organization. The purpose of this team was to establish the conditions that exist in the various discipline

areas, i.e., QA, engineering, construction, at this stage of the construction.. Specific emphasis would be placed on the identified quality problem areas, programs in place to resolve these areas and their impact on planning for the completion of the project. In addition, the relationships between the various subcontractors was to be looked into. This degree of involvement was considered vital before Bechtel could commit to a course of action either as the independent reviewer or to assume the follow-on role in assisting in managing the project.

This was explained in some detail in W. H. Dickhoner's (CG6E) letter of l November 10, 1982. I L The Bechtel team arrived to perform this function on tha first working day after the Order was effective. It was a mutual ' CG&E/Bechtel decision at that time that the proposed Bechtel review included all of the essential elements contained in the Order and should continue. The Bechtel site presence was ( diminished'when it was considered that they had sufficient information to complete the initial assessment of the project and to recommend a course of action. In as much as CG&E and Bechtel had independently and voluntarily agreed to a review similar to l-that set forth in the Order, we do not believe that Bechtel's objectivity has or will be affected. W. H. Dickhoner's (CG&E) letter of November 26, 1982 to Region III supports this position in greater detail. ./ 1

(.. Bechtel Power Corporation G Hr. William H. Dickhoner December 29, 1982 Page Five Bechtel's independence and objectivity is further ensured by the fact that we are a national engineer / constructor involved in all phases of nuclear power plant design and construction. The extent of our involvement is shown in Appendix C of Bechtel's submittal of November 23, 1982 and represents 90 plants. Bechtel's corporate QA program and supporting work procedures have been subject to the scrutiny of the NRC, many utility organizations and applicable national and state code boards. Of equal importance is our established reputation for maintaining high ethical standards. Bechtel's recommendations will be based on the facts discovered and on our professional integrity and experience in the nuclear industry. In addition, the approved r-action plan will be subject to continuing review and approval of the NRC. The matter of independence was also covered in detail in the Bechtel proposal of November 23, 1982 submitted to CG&E. Sincerely yours, Howard W. Wahl Vice President & General Manager HWW/cf 1 i 1 ,.}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20023D079&oldid=4630951"