ML20066H095: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot change
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.--         --.        . , -          .    - - .                  .        - . - . , .                                    . - . - . . - .                      --          - .      . . . . .  ,
{{#Wiki_filter:.--
REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM 3/4.a.3 4EACTOR COOLANT _ SYSTEM LEAKAGE                                                                                                                                               4
REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM 3/4.a.3 4EACTOR COOLANT _ SYSTEM LEAKAGE 4
            ,          LEAKAGE OETECTION SYSTEMS
LEAKAGE OETECTION SYSTEMS
                      ;.19!TINGCONDITIONFOROPERAT!0N                                                                         '
;.19!TINGCONDITIONFOROPERAT!0N l
l i
I 3.4.3.1 The follcwing' *eactor coolant system leakage ostection systems sh ee OPERABLE:
I 3.4.3.1 ee OPERABLE:    The     follcwing' *eactor coolant system leakage ostection systems sh a.
The drywell atmosohere particulate radioactivity monitoring' syste a.
The drywell atmosohere particulate radioactivity monitoring' syste b.
b.
The drywell systems,              and pedestal-floor sump drain flow monitoring c.
The drywell and pedestal-floor sump drain flow monitoring
Either the drywell air coolers condensate flow rate monitoring system-or the drywell atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring system.
: systems, Either the drywell air coolers condensate flow rate monitoring system-c.
APPLICA8ILITY
or the drywell atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring system.
(
(
OPERATIONAL-CON 0!TIONS 1, 2 and 3.
APPLICA8ILITY OPERATIONAL-CON 0!TIONS 1, 2 and 3.
ACTION:
ACTION:
* tion may cotwo of the aboveto          -
two of the above required leakage detection systems OPERA 8 tion may co to 30 days provided grab sam rywell: atmos-gg phere are obtained and ana gaseous and/or particula M aours when the required Y
required leakage detection systems OPERA 8 30 days *provided grab sam gg         phere are obtained and ana gaseous and/or particula                                                             M           aours                     when the rywell: atmos-required Y           wise, be in                                                           ve so SHUT 00WH within'the.next 12 hou em i's inoperable; other-LO.SHUTOOWN e following 24 hours.                                                                                                    .
wise, be in SHUT 00WH within'the.next 12 hou LO.SHUTOOWN ve so em i's inoperable; other-e following 24 hours.
1,U,RVEILLANCEREQUIREMENTS 4.4.3.1 The reactor coolant sy. stem leakage detection systems shall be demon-                                                                                                       :
1,U,RVEILLANCEREQUIREMENTS 4.4.3.1 The reactor coolant sy. stem leakage detection systems shall be demon-strated OPERA 8LE by:
strated OPERA 8LE by:
Drywell atmosphere particulate and gaseous monitoring systems -
a.
a.
Drywell atmosphere particulate and gaseous monitoring systems -
performance of a CHANNEL CHECK at11 east'once per 12 hours, 4. CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST at least once-per 31 days and a CHANNEL CALIBRATION at least once par 18 sonths, b.
performance of a CHANNEL CHECK at11 east'once per 12 hours, 4. CHANNEL
The sump drain flow' monitoring systems performance af a CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TE51 at least once per 31 days and a. CHANNEL CALIBRATION.
:                                      FUNCTIONAL TEST at least once-per 31 days and a CHANNEL CALIBRATION at least once par 18 sonths,
TEST at.least cnce per 18 months, c.
: b. The sump drain flow' monitoring systems performance af a CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TE51 at least once per 31 days and a . CHANNEL CALIBRATION .
Orywell air coo er.: candensate -flow rate monitoring system-performance of a CHANhel FUNCTIONAL TEST at least once per 31 days and a CHANNEL CAL!BRATION st' least once per 18 montns.
TEST at.least cnce per 18 months,
F1ow testing the drywell floor-drain sump inist piping for blockage d.
: c. Orywell air coo er.: candensate -flow rate monitoring system-
at least once per 18 months. "
        '                              performance of a CHANhel FUNCTIONAL TEST at least once per 31 days and a CHANNEL CAL!BRATION st' least once per 18 montns.   -
.w y. p..
: d. F1ow testing the drywell floor-drain sump inist piping for blockage at least once per 18 months. "                                                                                                                                       .
w..
                      .w y . p . .
y.. f.....J...W,,, ' er Je. 3;,- b;; f;";#g f' : t r: f 0:' 'g -
w .. y.. f.. ...J ...W ,,, ' er Je . 3;,- b;; f;";#g f' : t r: f 0:' 'g -                                                                               -!
....u,<
                      ....u,<
RIVER BENO - UNIT 1 3/4 4-10 l
RIVER BENO - UNIT 1                                                 3/4 4-10 l
2200166 910213 ADOCK 05000458 p
2200166 910213                                                                                           .
PDR l
p            ADOCK 05000458                                                                                                       .                                                    .;
,,-n,.
PDR                                                                                             ,                                                        l
,n,.
                                                        - , . . , , -            ,,-n,.       -    ,n,.   , , _ , , , . , , , .                      -,,m-,n.           ,,-,,      , . ~           ,+
-,,m-,n.
,. ~
4
,+


s s                                                                                                                                                                           q REACTOR COOLANT $YSTEM OPERATIONAL LEAKAGE r                                   .
s q
[
s REACTOR COOLANT $YSTEM OPERATIONAL LEAKAGE r
LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION '                                                                                                                                                  '
LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION '
:l 3.4.3.2 Reactor coolant system leakage _ shail be' limited' to:.                                                                                                                     i
:l 3.4.3.2 Reactor coolant system leakage _ shail be' limited' to:.
: a.       No PRESSURE B0UNDARY LEAKAGE.
a.
: b.       5 gpa UNIDENTIFIED LEAKAGE.
No PRESSURE B0UNDARY LEAKAGE.
: c.      25gpatotalleakage-(averaged.overfany24-hourperiod$:
b.
:                                                                                                                                                                                                        1 d."'     O.5 gpa per nominal inch of valve l size up to' a-maximum of:5 gpa leakage at a reactor: coolant system pressure of 1025 t 15.psig from any reactor coolant: system pressure isolation valve specified'in.
5 gpa UNIDENTIFIED LEAKAGE.
3      Table 3.4.3.2 .1.;                                                           *
25gpatotalleakage-(averaged.overfany24-hourperiod$:
                                                                                                                              ~
1 c.
ITY:         OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1,. 2 and 3.
d."'
O.5 gpa per nominal inch of valve l size up to' a-maximum of:5 gpa leakage at a reactor: coolant system pressure of 1025 t 15.psig from any reactor coolant: system pressure isolation valve specified'in.
Table 3.4.3.2.1.;
3
~
ITY:
OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1,. 2 and 3.
ACTION:
ACTION:
* 4
4
                                                                                                      - .                     *~
*~
With any PRESSURE 800NDARY LEAKAGE,<be in at least'H0T-SHUTDOWN within..
a.
a.
With any PRESSURE 800NDARY LEAKAGE,<be in at least'H0T-SHUTDOWN within..                                                                                        ,
12 hours and in COLD SHUTD0WN'withincthe.nexti24" hours.t b.
12 hours and in COLD SHUTD0WN'withincthe.nexti24" hours.t
With any reactor coolant system'1eakagej greater than the limits in' b ~
: b.         With any reactor coolant system'1eakagej greater than the limits in' b ~
~
                                                                                                                                    ~
and/or c above, reduce theileakage' rate'to sithin the limits within--
and/or c above, reduce theileakage' rate'to sithin the limits within--
4' hours o,r be in at least NOT SNUTDOWN within the next?l2~ hours'and in-COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 241 hours'.
4' hours o,r be in at least NOT SNUTDOWN within the next?l2~ hours'and in-COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 241 hours'.
                            ' c.
' c.
With any reactor coolant system pressurelisciation valve leakage greater                                                                                       ,
With any reactor coolant system pressurelisciation valve leakage greater than the.above limit. isolate the highipressure: portion of. the Laffacted 1
than the.above limit . isolate the highipressure: portion of. the Laffacted                                                                                   1 systes fron' the low' pressure portion within 4(hours by uselof                                               :              at least two other closed manual,' deactivated automatic or: check
systes fron' the low' pressure portion within 4(hours by uselof at least two other closed manual,' deactivated automatic or: check
* valves, or:
* valves, or:
be.in at ler t HOT' SHUTDOWN within'the nekt 12' hours and in' COLD SHUTDOWN wiu.in-the following 24 hours.#                                                                                                                       .
be.in at ler t HOT' SHUTDOWN within'the nekt 12 hours and in' COLD SHUTDOWN wiu.in-the following 24 hours.#
d.
d.
                                      .With one or more of the high/ low pressur'e interface valve leakage L                                                                                         8 l
.With one or more of the high/ low pressur'e interface valve leakage L 8
pressure monitors. shown in-Table 3;4.3.2-2 inoperable, restore the                                                                                             :
pressure monitors. shown in-Table 3;4.3.2-2 inoperable, restore the l
i inoperable monitor (s) to 0PERA8LE status within'7 days'ordvarify the-                                                                                         !
inoperable monitor (s) to 0PERA8LE status within'7 days'ordvarify the-i
                                      ' pressure to be less'than.the alarm point 'at lea' st once per.12: hours; restore the inoperable monitor (s)<to:0PERABLE.. status within 30 days or be in at least-HOT: SHUTDOWN within' the next 12 hours and COLD : .
' pressure to be less'than.the alarm point 'at lea' t once per.12: hours; s
SHUTDOWN within the following 24: hours. The-provisions. ^of Specifi-'
restore the inoperable monitor (s)<to:0PERABLE.. status within 30 days or be in at least-HOT: SHUTDOWN within' the next 12 hours and COLD :.
NECEiVED                                 cation:3.0.4-are not applicable.                                                                                                                                 <
SHUTDOWN within the following 24: hours.
a RUG 131987 INsr.nr III
The-provisions. ^of Specifi-'
        .S D C.
NECEiVED cation:3.0.4-are not applicable.
j  '
RUG 131987 INsr.nr III aj
                  " Which have been verified not to exceed the allowable ' leakage. limit-at the 11ast: refueling outage or after.the-last time the valve was-disturbed.1                                                                                                       a Lwhichever is more recent.
.S D C.
                                                                                                                                                                                                        )
" Which have been verified not to exceed the allowable ' leakage. limit-at the 11ast: refueling outage or after.the-last time the valve was-disturbed.1 Lwhichever is more recent.
  .e       ,      -n       ,n.           ,, ,-  ,,n.,     ,, , . - w ~w + , , , , , , . , , , ,.n...-,-.-     ;.,~...   ,,.,_.,-,_.L4i,~w-                           ,..w.--.     . . . . , . . . .Aw
a
)
.e
-n
,n.
,,n.,
,,,. - w ~w +,,,,,,.,,,
,.n...-,-.-
;.,~...
,,.,_.,-,_.L4i,~w-
,..w.--.
.Aw


REACTOR C001. ANT SYSTEM 51)RVillLANCE RIOUIR(MENTS l
REACTOR C001. ANT SYSTEM 51)RVillLANCE RIOUIR(MENTS 4.4.3.2.1 each of: the above'Italts by:The reactor coolant system leaka Monitoring the drywell atmospheric particulate radioactivity a.
4.4.3.2.1                                                                                                                   -;
once per ' 2 hours, b.
each of: the above'Italts by:The reactor coolant system leakag
: a.                                                                                                                  !
                                                                    ,          Monitoring   the drywell atmospheric particulate radioactivity once per ' 2 hours, b.
Monitoring the sung flow rates at least once per 12 hours.-
Monitoring the sung flow rates at least once per 12 hours.-
Monitoring the drpell air coolers condensate flow rate at least on,
c.
c.
Monitoring per         the 12 hours, anddrpell air coolers condensate flow rate at least on ,
per 12 hours, and d.
d.
Monitoring the reactor vessel head flange leak detection system at least once per 24 hours.
Monitoring   the 24 least once per  reactor hours.      vessel head flange leak detection system at 4.4.3.2.2 - fech reactor coolant system pressure isolation valve specified in Table 3.4.3.2 1 shall be demonstrated CPERA8LE b leak testing pursuant to Specification 4.0.5 including paragraph IW 3427 l) of the A5ME Code and verifying the leakage of each valve to be within the specified limit:
4.4.3.2.2 - fech reactor coolant system pressure isolation valve specified in Table 3.4.3.2 1 shall be demonstrated CPERA8LE b leak testing pursuant to Specification 4.0.5 including paragraph IW 3427 l) of the A5ME Code and verifying the leakage of each valve to be within the specified limit:
: a.      LAt least once per 18 monthd and b.
LAt least once per 18 monthd and a.
prior to returning the valve to service' following maintenance,                                             l repair or replacement work on the valve which could affect its leakage rate.
b.
                                                              . The provisions of- Specification 4.0.4 are not applicable Lfer entry into OPERATIONAL CONDITION 3.
prior to returning the valve to service' following maintenance, l
4.4.3.2.3 The high/ low pressure interface valve leakage pressure monitors shall be demonstrated performance            of as      CPERA8LE with alarm setpoints per ''Table 3.4.3.2-2 by
repair or replacement work on the valve which could affect its leakage rate.
: a.      CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST at least once per 31 days, and l                         .                                      b'.       CHANNEL CALIBRAT!0N at least once per 18 months.
. The provisions of-Specification 4.0.4 are not applicable Lfer entry into OPERATIONAL CONDITION 3.
4.4.3.2.3 The high/ low pressure interface valve leakage pressure monitors shall be demonstrated CPERA8LE with alarm setpoints per Table 3.4.3.2-2 by performance of as CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST at least once per 31 days, and a.
l b'.
CHANNEL CALIBRAT!0N at least once per 18 months.
i IIiN''35 [N3N,b-EiN.2 '"[I!h"* ""8'
i IIiN''35 [N3N,b-EiN.2 '"[I!h"* ""8'
                                                                                                                                .                          'I'*I"5 '"' ' *i           '
'I'*I"5 '"' ' *i s
s AIVER SEND - 15171                         3/4 4 12                                       Amenenent No.: 7' l                                                                       RECElYEO t
AIVER SEND - 15171 3/4 4 12 Amenenent No.: 7' RECElYEO l
AUG 131987 l
t AUG 131987 l
                                                                            .S DC                   .
.S DC l
* l
..,.,-,-.+--.,.-.,.,......-..u,~...,.,,
      . . . , - - - -                            , <          ,-            -.                      ..,.,-,-.+--.,.-.,.,......-..u,~...,.,,                 . , + . . ......-.n,-,
., +..
......-.n,-,


1 l
1 l
1 ENCLOSURE II t
1 ENCLOSURE II t
INSERT Basis of Specification 3/4.4.3.1 The drywell and pedestal floor sump drain flow monitoring systems consist of 2 sumps with one level transmitter and two 100% pumps each. The level transmitters feed Main Control Room level indicators as well as various automatic control systems. Each of the automatic systems calculate leakage, control pumps and provide annunciation. The leak rate may be determined by the automatic system or a manual procedure through the use of the -level indication and pump control switches located'in the main control room. The substitution of grab samples for the' drywell particulate and gaseous monitors is to allow for continued monitoring of the function -
INSERT Basis of Specification 3/4.4.3.1 The drywell and pedestal floor sump drain flow monitoring systems consist of 2 sumps with one level transmitter and two 100% pumps each.
The level transmitters feed Main Control Room level indicators as well as various automatic control systems.
Each of the automatic systems calculate leakage, control pumps and provide annunciation.
The leak rate may be determined by the automatic system or a manual procedure through the use of the -level indication and pump control switches located'in the main control room.
The substitution of grab samples for the' drywell particulate and gaseous monitors is to allow for continued monitoring of the function -
while normal components are inoperable.
while normal components are inoperable.
Basis of Specification 3/4.4.3.2 The use of the drywell= radiation monitors as alternate means to monitor a change in the leakage while the sump f. low monitoring system is inoperable is to continue to provide the-operator with drywell leakage information during system outages. The new LCO. 3.'4.'3.2.0 is intended to address Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking- (IGSCC) concerns cf propagating a crack due to these effects.       . Leakage whicit continues to increase at a rate of greater than or equal to 2; gpm in a period of.24 hours may be' indicative of IGSCC and entry into the appropriate action'is required. Increases in leakage resulting from normal plant activities that stabilize and are no longer increasing at the above rate within the allowed LCO action time (e.g. a packing leak) are not intended-to be addressed by this LCO but continue to be included in the total unidentified leakage limit of 5 gpm.
Basis of Specification 3/4.4.3.2 The use of the drywell= radiation monitors as alternate means to monitor a change in the leakage while the sump
: f. low monitoring system is inoperable is to continue to provide the-operator with drywell leakage information during system outages.
The new LCO.
3.'4.'3.2.0 is intended to address Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking- (IGSCC) concerns cf propagating a crack due to these effects.
. Leakage whicit continues to increase at a rate of greater than or equal to 2; gpm in a period of.24 hours may be' indicative of IGSCC and entry into the appropriate action'is required.
Increases in leakage resulting from normal plant activities that stabilize and are no longer increasing at the above rate within the allowed LCO action time (e.g. a packing leak) are not intended-to be addressed by this LCO but continue to be included in the total unidentified leakage limit of 5 gpm.
I 1
I 1


, _ ~. - - .- - .-. -                            - .    . . - . --                      . - - -                                        . - . - - . - -          --.-
, _ ~. - -.- -.-. -
i
i q
    .      .                                                                                                                                                                              q J
J g
g    .3         MEACTOR COOLANT SYSTEN
.3 MEACTOR COOLANT SYSTEN
          .V a                      3/4.4 ' REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM L                       BASES j
.V 3/4.4 ' REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM a
L BASES j
SAFETY / RELIEF VALVES (Continued)-
SAFETY / RELIEF VALVES (Continued)-
                                                                                                                                                    ~
~
Demonstration of the safety-relief valve' lift settirags will occur only during shutdown and willibe-performed in accordance withlthe' provisions of                                                                               4
Demonstration of the safety-relief valve' lift settirags will occur only during shutdown and willibe-performed in accordance withlthe' provisions of 4
                      . Specification _4.0.5.-                                                                                                 >"
. Specification _4.0.5.-
The low-low set system ensures that safety / relief valve 1 discharges are minimized for a second opening of these~ valves, following any overpressure-
The low-low set system ensures that safety / relief valve 1 discharges are minimized for a second opening of these~ valves, following any overpressure-transient.- This. is_ achieved by automatically. lowering thesclosing s'atpoint ofl a
  '                  transient.- This. is_ achieved by automatically. lowering thesclosing s'atpoint ofl                                                                               a 5 valves and lowering the opening setpoint of 2 valves following!the\ initial opening. 'In-this way, the frequency and magnitude of the' containment blowdown                                                                                       a duty cycle is substantially reduced.1 Sufficient redundancy 11s provided_ fori ,                                                                                       ;
5 valves and lowering the opening setpoint of 2 valves following!the\\ initial opening. 'In-this way, the frequency and magnitude of the' containment blowdown a
the low-low set system such that failure of any one valve to;cpen or close at                                                                                           >
duty cycle is substantially reduced.1 Sufficient redundancy 11s provided_ fori,
its reduced setpoint does:not violate =the design basis..                                                                                                             ;
the low-low set system such that failure of any one valve to;cpen or close at its reduced setpoint does:not violate =the design basis..
3/4.4.3 REACTOR C00LANT' SYSTEM LEAKAGE
3/4.4.3 REACTOR C00LANT' SYSTEM LEAKAGE a
* a 3/4.4.3.1 LEAKAGE DETECTION-SYSTEMS-                                                                                                                                 "
3/4.4.3.1 LEAKAGE DETECTION-SYSTEMS-The RCS lea'kage-detection syptoms; required by'this1 specification;ars provided to monitor and detect leakage from the; reactor < coolant pressure J
The RCS lea'kage-detection syptoms; required by'this1 specification;ars                                                                                         s.
s boundary. -' These detection syste'es are consistent with-the' recommendations of-Regulatory Guide 1.45,1" Reactor. Coolant Pressure _ Boundary: Leakage: Detection d
provided to monitor and detect leakage from the; reactor < coolant pressure                                                                                     .
Systems", May 1973. ;In conformance with; Regulatory Guide 1;45, the atmospheric seous radioactivity system will:have aisensitivity.of;10 8.pC1/cc.;
J
-t UEEIU J
                    '  boundary. -' These detection syste'es are consistent with-the' recommendations of-                                                                             '
" 4.4.3.2 OPERATIONAL LEAKAGE E
        '              Regulatory Guide 1.45,1" Reactor. Coolant Pressure _ Boundary: Leakage: Detection                                                                                 d Systems", May 1973. ;In conformance with; Regulatory Guide 1;45, the atmospheric                                                                                       '
The allowable leakage > rates from the-reacto_r coolant' system:have been based-j on the predicted and experimentally 1 observed behavior of cracks.in pipas., Ther normally-expected background: leakage, due'to: equipment; design and:the c'etection!
UEEIU seous radioactivity system will:have aisensitivity.of;10 8.pC1/cc.;                                                                                             -t
l
                      " 4.4.3.2       OPERATIONAL LEAKAGE                                                                             E J
;e capability.of the1 instrumentation:for; determining; system;1eakage, wasfalso I
The allowable leakage > rates from the-reacto_r coolant' system:have been based-                                                                             j on the predicted and experimentally 1 observed behavior of cracks .in pipas., Ther l                    normally-expected background: leakage, due'to: equipment; design and:the c'etection!
considered.
                                                                                    .                                                                                                    ;e I                    capability.of the1 instrumentation:for; determining; system;1eakage, wasfalso considered. The evidence 'obtained from- experiments suggests that,lfor leakagen                                                                                       '
The evidence 'obtained from-experiments suggests that,lfor leakagen a
a somewhat greater than-thathspecifind for UNIDENTIFIEDJLEAKAGE, the' probability-is small that the imperfection:or crack. associated ~withisuch leakage would growl rapidly.
somewhat greater than-thathspecifind for UNIDENTIFIEDJLEAKAGE, the' probability-is small that the imperfection:or crack. associated ~withisuch leakage would growl rapidly.
However, in a11 Leases,11f _the leakage Lrates exceed the1 values Lspecified or t_he leakage'is located and-knowntto be PRESSURE B0UNDARY LEAKAGE,ithe reactor:                                                                                       #
However, in a11 Leases,11f _the leakage Lrates exceed the1 values Lspecified or t_he leakage'is located and-knowntto be PRESSURE B0UNDARY LEAKAGE,ithe reactor:
                    . will be shut down totallow furtheriinvestigationiand: corrective action.
. will be shut down totallow furtheriinvestigationiand: corrective action.
: l.                                                                                                                                                                                             '
l.
l                           The Surveillance Requirements forJRCS pressure!isoiation valves provide-added assurance of valveEintegrity,1thereby- reducing thenprobability of gross valve failure and consequentiintersystem;LOCA.: Leakage;from the RCS pressure-isolation valves is IDENTIFIED' LEAKAGE and will;be: considered asta portion of                                                                                         :
l The Surveillance Requirements forJRCS pressure!isoiation valves provide-added assurance of valveEintegrity,1thereby-reducing thenprobability of gross valve failure and consequentiintersystem;LOCA.: Leakage;from the RCS pressure-isolation valves is IDENTIFIED' LEAKAGE and will;be: considered asta portion of
he allowed limit.                                     "
+ '
                                                                                                                                                        ~
he allowed limit.
      + '    gwg7g                                                           '
~
RIVER BEND - UNIT 1                                   B'3/4 4-3.                                                                                                   i S._,       .    . _ _ _ , , %_,. _, ,. ,, , - ,..,,,_ , _, , _ _ ,,, ~ .% m y _ ,,73                     ,s       ,,.,g,,,m._,,,.,%.}}
gwg7g RIVER BEND - UNIT 1 B'3/4 4-3.
i m
S._,
_,,.,,, -,..,,,_, _,, _ _,,, ~.% m y _,,73
,s
,,.,g,,,m._,,,.,%.}}

Latest revision as of 11:57, 16 December 2024

Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.4.3 Re Limiting Conditions for Operation & Surveillance Requirements for RCS Leakage & Leakage Detection Sys
ML20066H095
Person / Time
Site: River Bend 
Issue date: 02/13/1991
From:
GULF STATES UTILITIES CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20066H094 List:
References
NUDOCS 9102200166
Download: ML20066H095 (5)


Text

.--

REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM 3/4.a.3 4EACTOR COOLANT _ SYSTEM LEAKAGE 4

LEAKAGE OETECTION SYSTEMS

.19!TINGCONDITIONFOROPERAT!0N l

I 3.4.3.1 The follcwing' *eactor coolant system leakage ostection systems sh ee OPERABLE:

The drywell atmosohere particulate radioactivity monitoring' syste a.

b.

The drywell and pedestal-floor sump drain flow monitoring

systems, Either the drywell air coolers condensate flow rate monitoring system-c.

or the drywell atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring system.

(

APPLICA8ILITY OPERATIONAL-CON 0!TIONS 1, 2 and 3.

ACTION:

two of the above required leakage detection systems OPERA 8 tion may co to 30 days provided grab sam rywell: atmos-gg phere are obtained and ana gaseous and/or particula M aours when the required Y

wise, be in SHUT 00WH within'the.next 12 hou LO.SHUTOOWN ve so em i's inoperable; other-e following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.

1,U,RVEILLANCEREQUIREMENTS 4.4.3.1 The reactor coolant sy. stem leakage detection systems shall be demon-strated OPERA 8LE by:

Drywell atmosphere particulate and gaseous monitoring systems -

a.

performance of a CHANNEL CHECK at11 east'once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />, 4. CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST at least once-per 31 days and a CHANNEL CALIBRATION at least once par 18 sonths, b.

The sump drain flow' monitoring systems performance af a CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TE51 at least once per 31 days and a. CHANNEL CALIBRATION.

TEST at.least cnce per 18 months, c.

Orywell air coo er.: candensate -flow rate monitoring system-performance of a CHANhel FUNCTIONAL TEST at least once per 31 days and a CHANNEL CAL!BRATION st' least once per 18 montns.

F1ow testing the drywell floor-drain sump inist piping for blockage d.

at least once per 18 months. "

.w y. p..

w..

y.. f.....J...W,,, ' er Je. 3;,- b;; f;";#g f' : t r: f 0:' 'g -

....u,<

RIVER BENO - UNIT 1 3/4 4-10 l

2200166 910213 ADOCK 05000458 p

PDR l

,,-n,.

,n,.

-,,m-,n.

,. ~

4

,+

s q

s REACTOR COOLANT $YSTEM OPERATIONAL LEAKAGE r

LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION '

l 3.4.3.2 Reactor coolant system leakage _ shail be' limited' to:.

a.

No PRESSURE B0UNDARY LEAKAGE.

b.

5 gpa UNIDENTIFIED LEAKAGE.

25gpatotalleakage-(averaged.overfany24-hourperiod$:

1 c.

d."'

O.5 gpa per nominal inch of valve l size up to' a-maximum of:5 gpa leakage at a reactor: coolant system pressure of 1025 t 15.psig from any reactor coolant: system pressure isolation valve specified'in.

Table 3.4.3.2.1.;

3

~

ITY:

OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1,. 2 and 3.

ACTION:

4

  • ~

With any PRESSURE 800NDARY LEAKAGE,<be in at least'H0T-SHUTDOWN within..

a.

12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTD0WN'withincthe.nexti24" hours.t b.

With any reactor coolant system'1eakagej greater than the limits in' b ~

~

and/or c above, reduce theileakage' rate'to sithin the limits within--

4' hours o,r be in at least NOT SNUTDOWN within the next?l2~ hours'and in-COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 241 hours0.00279 days <br />0.0669 hours <br />3.984788e-4 weeks <br />9.17005e-5 months <br />'.

' c.

With any reactor coolant system pressurelisciation valve leakage greater than the.above limit. isolate the highipressure: portion of. the Laffacted 1

systes fron' the low' pressure portion within 4(hours by uselof at least two other closed manual,' deactivated automatic or: check

  • valves, or:

be.in at ler t HOT' SHUTDOWN within'the nekt 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> and in' COLD SHUTDOWN wiu.in-the following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.#

d.

.With one or more of the high/ low pressur'e interface valve leakage L 8

pressure monitors. shown in-Table 3;4.3.2-2 inoperable, restore the l

inoperable monitor (s) to 0PERA8LE status within'7 days'ordvarify the-i

' pressure to be less'than.the alarm point 'at lea' t once per.12: hours; s

restore the inoperable monitor (s)<to:0PERABLE.. status within 30 days or be in at least-HOT: SHUTDOWN within' the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> and COLD :.

SHUTDOWN within the following 24: hours.

The-provisions. ^of Specifi-'

NECEiVED cation:3.0.4-are not applicable.

RUG 131987 INsr.nr III aj

.S D C.

" Which have been verified not to exceed the allowable ' leakage. limit-at the 11ast: refueling outage or after.the-last time the valve was-disturbed.1 Lwhichever is more recent.

a

)

.e

-n

,n.

,,n.,

,,,. - w ~w +,,,,,,.,,,

,.n...-,-.-

.,~...

,,.,_.,-,_.L4i,~w-

,..w.--.

.Aw

REACTOR C001. ANT SYSTEM 51)RVillLANCE RIOUIR(MENTS 4.4.3.2.1 each of: the above'Italts by:The reactor coolant system leaka Monitoring the drywell atmospheric particulate radioactivity a.

once per ' 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, b.

Monitoring the sung flow rates at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.-

Monitoring the drpell air coolers condensate flow rate at least on,

c.

per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />, and d.

Monitoring the reactor vessel head flange leak detection system at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.

4.4.3.2.2 - fech reactor coolant system pressure isolation valve specified in Table 3.4.3.2 1 shall be demonstrated CPERA8LE b leak testing pursuant to Specification 4.0.5 including paragraph IW 3427 l) of the A5ME Code and verifying the leakage of each valve to be within the specified limit:

LAt least once per 18 monthd and a.

b.

prior to returning the valve to service' following maintenance, l

repair or replacement work on the valve which could affect its leakage rate.

. The provisions of-Specification 4.0.4 are not applicable Lfer entry into OPERATIONAL CONDITION 3.

4.4.3.2.3 The high/ low pressure interface valve leakage pressure monitors shall be demonstrated CPERA8LE with alarm setpoints per Table 3.4.3.2-2 by performance of as CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST at least once per 31 days, and a.

l b'.

CHANNEL CALIBRAT!0N at least once per 18 months.

i IIiN35 [N3N,b-EiN.2 '"[I!h"* ""8'

'I'*I"5 '"' ' *i s

AIVER SEND - 15171 3/4 4 12 Amenenent No.: 7' RECElYEO l

t AUG 131987 l

.S DC l

..,.,-,-.+--.,.-.,.,......-..u,~...,.,,

., +..

......-.n,-,

1 l

1 ENCLOSURE II t

INSERT Basis of Specification 3/4.4.3.1 The drywell and pedestal floor sump drain flow monitoring systems consist of 2 sumps with one level transmitter and two 100% pumps each.

The level transmitters feed Main Control Room level indicators as well as various automatic control systems.

Each of the automatic systems calculate leakage, control pumps and provide annunciation.

The leak rate may be determined by the automatic system or a manual procedure through the use of the -level indication and pump control switches located'in the main control room.

The substitution of grab samples for the' drywell particulate and gaseous monitors is to allow for continued monitoring of the function -

while normal components are inoperable.

Basis of Specification 3/4.4.3.2 The use of the drywell= radiation monitors as alternate means to monitor a change in the leakage while the sump

f. low monitoring system is inoperable is to continue to provide the-operator with drywell leakage information during system outages.

The new LCO.

3.'4.'3.2.0 is intended to address Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking- (IGSCC) concerns cf propagating a crack due to these effects.

. Leakage whicit continues to increase at a rate of greater than or equal to 2; gpm in a period of.24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> may be' indicative of IGSCC and entry into the appropriate action'is required.

Increases in leakage resulting from normal plant activities that stabilize and are no longer increasing at the above rate within the allowed LCO action time (e.g. a packing leak) are not intended-to be addressed by this LCO but continue to be included in the total unidentified leakage limit of 5 gpm.

I 1

, _ ~. - -.- -.-. -

i q

J g

.3 MEACTOR COOLANT SYSTEN

.V 3/4.4 ' REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM a

L BASES j

SAFETY / RELIEF VALVES (Continued)-

~

Demonstration of the safety-relief valve' lift settirags will occur only during shutdown and willibe-performed in accordance withlthe' provisions of 4

. Specification _4.0.5.-

The low-low set system ensures that safety / relief valve 1 discharges are minimized for a second opening of these~ valves, following any overpressure-transient.- This. is_ achieved by automatically. lowering thesclosing s'atpoint ofl a

5 valves and lowering the opening setpoint of 2 valves following!the\\ initial opening. 'In-this way, the frequency and magnitude of the' containment blowdown a

duty cycle is substantially reduced.1 Sufficient redundancy 11s provided_ fori,

the low-low set system such that failure of any one valve to;cpen or close at its reduced setpoint does:not violate =the design basis..

3/4.4.3 REACTOR C00LANT' SYSTEM LEAKAGE a

3/4.4.3.1 LEAKAGE DETECTION-SYSTEMS-The RCS lea'kage-detection syptoms; required by'this1 specification;ars provided to monitor and detect leakage from the; reactor < coolant pressure J

s boundary. -' These detection syste'es are consistent with-the' recommendations of-Regulatory Guide 1.45,1" Reactor. Coolant Pressure _ Boundary: Leakage: Detection d

Systems", May 1973. ;In conformance with; Regulatory Guide 1;45, the atmospheric seous radioactivity system will:have aisensitivity.of;10 8.pC1/cc.;

-t UEEIU J

" 4.4.3.2 OPERATIONAL LEAKAGE E

The allowable leakage > rates from the-reacto_r coolant' system:have been based-j on the predicted and experimentally 1 observed behavior of cracks.in pipas., Ther normally-expected background: leakage, due'to: equipment; design and:the c'etection!

l

e capability.of the1 instrumentation
for; determining; system;1eakage, wasfalso I

considered.

The evidence 'obtained from-experiments suggests that,lfor leakagen a

somewhat greater than-thathspecifind for UNIDENTIFIEDJLEAKAGE, the' probability-is small that the imperfection:or crack. associated ~withisuch leakage would growl rapidly.

However, in a11 Leases,11f _the leakage Lrates exceed the1 values Lspecified or t_he leakage'is located and-knowntto be PRESSURE B0UNDARY LEAKAGE,ithe reactor:

. will be shut down totallow furtheriinvestigationiand: corrective action.

l.

l The Surveillance Requirements forJRCS pressure!isoiation valves provide-added assurance of valveEintegrity,1thereby-reducing thenprobability of gross valve failure and consequentiintersystem;LOCA.: Leakage;from the RCS pressure-isolation valves is IDENTIFIED' LEAKAGE and will;be: considered asta portion of

+ '

he allowed limit.

~

gwg7g RIVER BEND - UNIT 1 B'3/4 4-3.

i m

S._,

_,,.,,, -,..,,,_, _,, _ _,,, ~.% m y _,,73

,s

,,.,g,,,m._,,,.,%.