ML20086K096: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML20086K096 | | number = ML20086K096 | ||
| issue date = 01/16/1984 | | issue date = 01/16/1984 | ||
| title = Forwards NRC | | title = Forwards NRC Transmitting Comments on Util Operator Qualification Program.Ltr Referenced by ASLB in 820727 Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl | ||
| author name = Aamodt M | | author name = Aamodt M | ||
| author affiliation = AAMODTS | | author affiliation = AAMODTS | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| contact person = | | contact person = | ||
| document report number = NUDOCS 8401260222 | | document report number = NUDOCS 8401260222 | ||
| title reference date = 12-01-1980 | |||
| package number = ML20086K073 | | package number = ML20086K073 | ||
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, PUBLIC ENTITY/CITIZEN/ORGANIZATION/MEDIA TO NRC | | document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, PUBLIC ENTITY/CITIZEN/ORGANIZATION/MEDIA TO NRC | ||
| Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:r . | {{#Wiki_filter:r. | ||
v | v s. | ||
R. D. 5, Box 428 Coatesville, PA 19320 January 16, 1984 Administrative Judges Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 | R. D. 5, Box 428 Coatesville, PA 19320 January 16, 1984 Administrative Judges Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 | ||
==Dear Chairman Edles and Judges Kohl and Buck:== | ==Dear Chairman Edles and Judges Kohl and Buck:== | ||
The letter from Paul Collins of OLB to Henry Hukill and its attachment (Comments on Three Mile Island Operator Requalification Program) are being provided as promised on January 11, 1984 These documents are referenced by the Licensing Board in its July 27, 1982 decision at page 131, paragraph 2323 S cerely yours, M.< [r;._ [ | |||
The letter from Paul Collins of OLB to Henry Hukill and its attachment (Comments on Three Mile Island Operator Requalification Program) are being provided as promised on January 11, 1984 These documents are referenced by the Licensing Board in its July 27, 1982 decision at page 131, paragraph 2323 S cerely yours, M.< [r;._ [ | I1. | ||
Ac-ti | |||
/ | |||
Marj orie M. Aamodt 9 | Marj orie M. Aamodt 9 | ||
m 8401260222 840123 | m 8401260222 840123 PDR ADOCK 05000289 0 | ||
PDR | |||
~" | |||
. * }' $ 3 ** % | |||
UNITED STATES | |||
,y? | |||
,,g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION y | |||
DEC | g E | ||
Docket No. 50-289 d. | WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 | ||
%, v / | |||
*"*? | |||
DEC 1 1980 Docket No. 50-289 d. | |||
Mr. Henry D. Hukill Vice President and Director Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant Metropolitan Edison Company P. O.. Box 480 Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057 | Mr. Henry D. Hukill Vice President and Director Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant Metropolitan Edison Company P. O.. Box 480 Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057 | ||
==Dear Sir:== | ==Dear Sir:== | ||
We have reviewed the Revised Licensed Operator Qualification and Requalification Training Program submi.tted by you in response to the {{letter dated|date=March 28, 1980|text=March 28, 1980 letter}} fran H. R. Denton. | |||
We have reviewed the Revised Licensed Operator Qualification and Requalification Training Program submi.tted by you in response to the March 28, 1980 letter fran H. R. Denton. Based on our review, we find that program to be unacceptable for 'IMI-1 licensed operations personnel. | Based on our review, we find that program to be unacceptable for 'IMI-1 licensed operations personnel. | ||
Incorporation of tha itms listed in the enclosure to this letter will be | Incorporation of tha itms listed in the enclosure to this letter will be hecessary for acceptability. | ||
~ | |||
hecessary for acceptability. | Mr. Joseph McMillen has been assigned to review your program. He nay be reached on 3Ur.4%-7476. | ||
Mr. Joseph McMillen has been assigned to review your program. He nay be reached on 3Ur.4%-7476 | ( | ||
( | Sincerely, | ||
) | |||
.E | |||
'/ | |||
(' - | (' - | ||
l Operator Licensing Branch Division of Bran Factors Safety | p | ||
, i Pad. Collins, Chief l | |||
Operator Licensing Branch Division of Bran Factors Safety | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
l Coments on 'IMI Operator l | |||
l | Requalification Program cc: | ||
See next page I | |||
l l | l l | ||
I 1 | I 1 | ||
~ | |||
1 | 1 | ||
m | m i 3 | ||
i 3 | . w; s | ||
COiMENTS ON 7 FREE MILE ISIAND | |||
. ; OPERATOR REOUALIFICATION PROGRAM L | |||
(Unit 1 Adulnis'trative Procedure 1006) f 4 ~2.1(q)''Docn book cuizes administered for periodic evaluation of an Q | |||
_at tPe conclusion of a short series of lectures, we can not accept the concept of an open book examination testing the licensee's O | operators knowledge of the subject matter _do not appear apnropri- | ||
& 'iince these are oeriodic ouizes ana are normally admihliiitered | |||
_at tPe conclusion of a short series of lectures, we can not accept the concept of an open book examination testing the licensee's O | |||
' Enowledge of a subject' This nortion of the recualification program should be changed to reflect this requirenent. This | |||
at the plaa shall be modi.fied to state that all control nanipulations shall be performed at the plant or on the | -l enage should alsc be ude on page 6.0 witn reterence to the v | ||
similator. The March 28th letter provides for the use of | . annual written examinat2.ons. | ||
,ferer 9 to control nanipulations which are. not performed - | |||
2.2(c) | |||
suggested by the wording in your procedure as now written. | The re at the plaa shall be modi.fied to state that all control nanipulations shall be performed at the plant or on the similator. The March 28th letter provides for the use of | ||
This section nust be nodified to clarify the requirement for control nanipulations. | -a similator for control manipulations as a substitute for actual plant operations but does not allow the leeway suggested by the wording in your procedure as now written. | ||
4 This section nust be nodified to clarify the requirement for control nanipulations. | |||
In addition, the last paragraph of this sect %n states that, | In addition, the last paragraph of this sect %n states that, | ||
" licensed personnel, whose job assigrants a'e not directly related to udit operations will actively par;icpate in control | |||
( | ( | ||
* o mintain the skills and | roan operation a mininum of one shift per quarter. We do not believe this is adequate | ||
knowledge required to operate the plant in a safe mnner. | * o mintain the skills and knowledge required to operate the plant in a safe mnner. | ||
' This secton should be rodified to' better define " job assignnents not directly related to unit operations" and then require a specific numb'r of shift assigments per conth or per quarter depen?ng on the closeness to the day to day operations of the plant. | |||
For inst;cce a Licensed Nuclear Engineer assigned to the facility and wrking at the plant on a day to day basis, ene.. shift _.per;cntLmy,be adeouate, but the_ sam _e engineer assigned. on.a.non-routik,b, asis 6eeds nnre cine during a three nenth _ period to reta n his ikills and kncraledge to clearly reflecTEhe requfr5enEs~ | |||
day to day operations of the plant. For inst;cce a Licensed | .for these licensed personnel, y | ||
Nuclear Engineer assigned to the facility and wrking at the | The exmption frce taking the current annual evaluation 2.7 examination for personnel rece'i'i~nftheiFlichise"16ss'then v | ||
six nonths prior to the administration of this examination is unacceptable. Mewly licened personnel shall be required to enter the requalification program upon receipt of their license and will be exemot frcrn the annual evaluation examination only when this examination is administered.less than three (3) | |||
adeouate, but the_ sam _e engineer assigned. on.a.non-routik,b, asis 6eeds nnre cine during a three nenth _ period to reta n his ikills and kncraledge to clearly reflecTEhe requfr5enEs~ | L nonths.after the applicant.has ?dceNE[d,]hi'sIMC license'. ~ | ||
j t | |||
= | |||
six nonths prior to the administration of this examination is unacceptable. Mewly licened personnel shall be required to enter the requalification program upon receipt of their license and will be exemot frcrn the annual evaluation examination | l G_mpNSUS tC | ||
only when this examination is administered .less than three (3) nonths | [ | ||
1 j | |||
G_mpNSUS tC | |||
[ | |||
1 | |||
j | |||
CERTIFICATE & SERVICE | |||
~ | |||
This 13 to ecrtify that ft11owing: | This 13 to ecrtify that ft11owing: | ||
t | t l | ||
AAMODI HOTION FOR REOPENING TO EXAMINE LEAK RATE FALSIFICATION AT UNIT -1 AAMODE-LETTER-OF-JANUART-16T1984-TtrAFFEAL-90hRD-AND-A SUPPLE 1ENT TO AAMODI COM!ENIS OF JANUARY 7,1984 CONCERNING NRC STAFF PROPOSAL FOR SIARTUP OF UNIT 1 AT 257. POWER were served by deposit in U. S. Mail, express to those marked | |||
* and otherwise first class, on January 24, 1984 | * and otherwise first class, on January 24, 1984 | ||
~ | |||
Service List | Service List | ||
* Commissioner Frederick Bernthal | |||
* Administrative Judge U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Gary J. Edles, Chairman Atomic Safety & Licensing Washington, D. C. 20555 Appeal Board | |||
* Atomic Safety & Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Panel Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Washington, D. C. 20555 | |||
* Administrative Judge | * Administrative Judge | ||
* Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Christina N. Kohl Board Panel Atomic Safety & Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Appeal Board Washington, D. C. 20555 | |||
'.. S. Nuclear Regulatory U | |||
Commission | |||
* Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Christina N. Kohl | * Docketing.& Service.Section Washington, D. C. 20555 Office of the Secretary U. S. Nuclear Reguletory Connission | ||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Appeal Board | * Administrative Judge Washington, D. C. 20555 J ohn H. Buck Atomic Safety & Licensing | ||
* Jack R. Goldber, Esq. | |||
* Docketing.& Service.Section Washington, D. C. 20555 | Appeal Board Office of the Executive Legal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory l | ||
Director Commission l | |||
* Jack R. Goldber , Esq. | U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | ||
Appeal Board | ~ | ||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Director Commission | Washington, D. C. 20555 i | ||
Washington, D. C. 20555 | |||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | * Commissioner Nunzio J. Palladino, Louise Bradford Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Consission Three Mile Island Alert 315 Peffer St. | ||
* Commissioner Nunzio J. Palladino, | Mashington, D. C. 20555 Harrisburg, EA 17102 | ||
Harrisburg, EA 17102 | * Commissioner James Asselstine l | ||
* Commissioner James Asselstine | U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Douglas Blazey, Chief Counsel Department of Environmental Resources Washington, D. C. 20555 Executive House Harrisburg, EA 17120 | ||
* Commissioner Victor Gilinsky | * Commissioner Victor Gilinsky U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission George F. Trowbridge, Esq. | ||
Washington, D. C. 20555 | Washington, D. C. 20555 Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge | ||
* Commissicner Thomas Roberts 1800 M St.., N. W. | |||
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20036 l | |||
Washington, D. C. 20555 | |||
-e- | |||
} | |||
Mithaal McBrida, Esq. | |||
Jane Lea s | |||
David E. Cole, Esq. | - LeBoguf,. Lamb, Leiby & MacRa3 183 Vollsy Road 1333 New Hampshire Ave., N. W. | ||
Etters, PA 17319 | |||
-Washington, D. C. 20036 David E. Cole, Esq. | |||
l Smith & Smith, P.D. | |||
2931 Pront St. | 2931 Pront St. | ||
Harrisburg, PA 17110 Ellyn R. Weiss, Esq. | Harrisburg, PA 17110 Ellyn R. Weiss, Esq. | ||
Harmon & Weiss 1725 I St., N.W. | Harmon & Weiss 1725 I St., N.W. | ||
-Suite 506 5 | |||
- Washington, D. C.20006 Edward J. Markey, Chairman. | |||
Subcomittee on Oversights | Subcomittee on Oversights | ||
& Investigations House Committee on Interior 205 Cannon House Office Bldg. | |||
Washington, D. C. 20515 Att: Richard D. Udell Robert Eddar U.S. House of Representatives t Washington, D. C. 20515 | Washington, D. C. 20515 Att: Richard D. Udell Robert Eddar U.S. House of Representatives t Washington, D. C. 20515 | ||
.Att: Bill Dickinson Michael W. Maupin, Esq. | |||
Hunton & Williams 707 E. Main St. | Hunton & Williams 707 E. Main St. | ||
P.O. Box 1535 R | P.O. Box 1535 R | ||
\ | mond, VA 23212 L ma h. (luaar Marjot e M. /.amodt | ||
\\ | |||
l l | l l | ||
\ | \\ | ||
~}} | ~}} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:58, 14 December 2024
| ML20086K096 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane |
| Issue date: | 01/16/1984 |
| From: | Aamodt M AAMODTS |
| To: | Buck, Edles, Kohl NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20086K073 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8401260222 | |
| Download: ML20086K096 (5) | |
Text
r.
v s.
R. D. 5, Box 428 Coatesville, PA 19320 January 16, 1984 Administrative Judges Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555
Dear Chairman Edles and Judges Kohl and Buck:
The letter from Paul Collins of OLB to Henry Hukill and its attachment (Comments on Three Mile Island Operator Requalification Program) are being provided as promised on January 11, 1984 These documents are referenced by the Licensing Board in its July 27, 1982 decision at page 131, paragraph 2323 S cerely yours, M.< [r;._ [
I1.
Ac-ti
/
Marj orie M. Aamodt 9
m 8401260222 840123 PDR ADOCK 05000289 0
~"
. * }' $ 3 ** %
UNITED STATES
,y?
,,g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION y
g E
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
%, v /
- "*?
DEC 1 1980 Docket No. 50-289 d.
Mr. Henry D. Hukill Vice President and Director Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant Metropolitan Edison Company P. O.. Box 480 Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057
Dear Sir:
We have reviewed the Revised Licensed Operator Qualification and Requalification Training Program submi.tted by you in response to the March 28, 1980 letter fran H. R. Denton.
Based on our review, we find that program to be unacceptable for 'IMI-1 licensed operations personnel.
Incorporation of tha itms listed in the enclosure to this letter will be hecessary for acceptability.
~
Mr. Joseph McMillen has been assigned to review your program. He nay be reached on 3Ur.4%-7476.
(
Sincerely,
)
.E
'/
(' -
p
, i Pad. Collins, Chief l
Operator Licensing Branch Division of Bran Factors Safety
Enclosure:
l Coments on 'IMI Operator l
Requalification Program cc:
See next page I
l l
I 1
~
1
m i 3
. w; s
COiMENTS ON 7 FREE MILE ISIAND
. ; OPERATOR REOUALIFICATION PROGRAM L
(Unit 1 Adulnis'trative Procedure 1006) f 4 ~2.1(q)Docn book cuizes administered for periodic evaluation of an Q
operators knowledge of the subject matter _do not appear apnropri-
& 'iince these are oeriodic ouizes ana are normally admihliiitered
_at tPe conclusion of a short series of lectures, we can not accept the concept of an open book examination testing the licensee's O
' Enowledge of a subject' This nortion of the recualification program should be changed to reflect this requirenent. This
-l enage should alsc be ude on page 6.0 witn reterence to the v
. annual written examinat2.ons.
,ferer 9 to control nanipulations which are. not performed -
2.2(c)
The re at the plaa shall be modi.fied to state that all control nanipulations shall be performed at the plant or on the similator. The March 28th letter provides for the use of
-a similator for control manipulations as a substitute for actual plant operations but does not allow the leeway suggested by the wording in your procedure as now written.
4 This section nust be nodified to clarify the requirement for control nanipulations.
In addition, the last paragraph of this sect %n states that,
" licensed personnel, whose job assigrants a'e not directly related to udit operations will actively par;icpate in control
(
roan operation a mininum of one shift per quarter. We do not believe this is adequate
- o mintain the skills and knowledge required to operate the plant in a safe mnner.
' This secton should be rodified to' better define " job assignnents not directly related to unit operations" and then require a specific numb'r of shift assigments per conth or per quarter depen?ng on the closeness to the day to day operations of the plant.
For inst;cce a Licensed Nuclear Engineer assigned to the facility and wrking at the plant on a day to day basis, ene.. shift _.per;cntLmy,be adeouate, but the_ sam _e engineer assigned. on.a.non-routik,b, asis 6eeds nnre cine during a three nenth _ period to reta n his ikills and kncraledge to clearly reflecTEhe requfr5enEs~
.for these licensed personnel, y
The exmption frce taking the current annual evaluation 2.7 examination for personnel rece'i'i~nftheiFlichise"16ss'then v
six nonths prior to the administration of this examination is unacceptable. Mewly licened personnel shall be required to enter the requalification program upon receipt of their license and will be exemot frcrn the annual evaluation examination only when this examination is administered.less than three (3)
L nonths.after the applicant.has ?dceNE[d,]hi'sIMC license'. ~
j t
=
l G_mpNSUS tC
[
1 j
CERTIFICATE & SERVICE
~
This 13 to ecrtify that ft11owing:
t l
AAMODI HOTION FOR REOPENING TO EXAMINE LEAK RATE FALSIFICATION AT UNIT -1 AAMODE-LETTER-OF-JANUART-16T1984-TtrAFFEAL-90hRD-AND-A SUPPLE 1ENT TO AAMODI COM!ENIS OF JANUARY 7,1984 CONCERNING NRC STAFF PROPOSAL FOR SIARTUP OF UNIT 1 AT 257. POWER were served by deposit in U. S. Mail, express to those marked
- and otherwise first class, on January 24, 1984
~
Service List
- Commissioner Frederick Bernthal
- Administrative Judge U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Gary J. Edles, Chairman Atomic Safety & Licensing Washington, D. C. 20555 Appeal Board
- Atomic Safety & Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Panel Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Washington, D. C. 20555
- Administrative Judge
- Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Christina N. Kohl Board Panel Atomic Safety & Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Appeal Board Washington, D. C. 20555
'.. S. Nuclear Regulatory U
Commission
- Docketing.& Service.Section Washington, D. C. 20555 Office of the Secretary U. S. Nuclear Reguletory Connission
- Administrative Judge Washington, D. C. 20555 J ohn H. Buck Atomic Safety & Licensing
- Jack R. Goldber, Esq.
Appeal Board Office of the Executive Legal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory l
Director Commission l
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
~
Washington, D. C. 20555 i
Washington, D. C. 20555
- Commissioner Nunzio J. Palladino, Louise Bradford Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Consission Three Mile Island Alert 315 Peffer St.
Mashington, D. C. 20555 Harrisburg, EA 17102
- Commissioner James Asselstine l
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Douglas Blazey, Chief Counsel Department of Environmental Resources Washington, D. C. 20555 Executive House Harrisburg, EA 17120
- Commissioner Victor Gilinsky U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission George F. Trowbridge, Esq.
Washington, D. C. 20555 Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge
- Commissicner Thomas Roberts 1800 M St.., N. W.
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20036 l
Washington, D. C. 20555
-e-
}
Mithaal McBrida, Esq.
Jane Lea s
- LeBoguf,. Lamb, Leiby & MacRa3 183 Vollsy Road 1333 New Hampshire Ave., N. W.
Etters, PA 17319
-Washington, D. C. 20036 David E. Cole, Esq.
l Smith & Smith, P.D.
2931 Pront St.
Harrisburg, PA 17110 Ellyn R. Weiss, Esq.
Harmon & Weiss 1725 I St., N.W.
-Suite 506 5
- Washington, D. C.20006 Edward J. Markey, Chairman.
Subcomittee on Oversights
& Investigations House Committee on Interior 205 Cannon House Office Bldg.
Washington, D. C. 20515 Att: Richard D. Udell Robert Eddar U.S. House of Representatives t Washington, D. C. 20515
.Att: Bill Dickinson Michael W. Maupin, Esq.
Hunton & Williams 707 E. Main St.
P.O. Box 1535 R
mond, VA 23212 L ma h. (luaar Marjot e M. /.amodt
\\
l l
\\
~