ML20215D911: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:yY | {{#Wiki_filter:yY TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: | ||
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS | 235.4(B) | ||
SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT TYPE: | |||
SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT TYPE: | SEQUOYAH ELEMENT REVISION NUMBER: 1 NON-RESTART JUSTIFICATION | ||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
TITLE: | |||
TITLE: | Exposed HV Cable Routed without Raceway-Personnel Hazard PAGE 1 0F 2 REASON FOR REVISION: | ||
Revised per TVA coments. | Revised per TVA coments. | ||
i PREPARATION PREPARED 8 - | i PREPARATION PREPARED 8 - | ||
"d b | |||
/O[d2//Pc;, | |||
.ew, | |||
/ | |||
/ | |||
4ISNATURE DATE (C | |||
REVIEWS MiT~ | REVIEWS MiT~ | ||
id | id 5 | ||
SIGNATURE DATE TAS | |||
/7 (f | |||
Ye f i | SIGNATURE DATE CONCURRENCES Ye f i | ||
CEG-H: | /fqrf(, | ||
CEG-H: | |||
W* | |||
/0 '2y-r6 SRP: | |||
I | |||
/2-8-66 SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE | |||
* DATE APPROVED BY: | * DATE APPROVED BY: | ||
Mofa4fd iz-ss a | |||
MANAGER OF NUCLEAR POWER | $I ECSPMANA$1 DATE MANAGER OF NUCLEAR POWER DATE CONCURRENCE (FINAL REPORT ONLY) | ||
*SRP Secretary'e signature denotes SRP concurrences are in files. | |||
10/21/86 - 01540 hok | 10/21/86 - 01540 hok OO h7 J | ||
P | |||
.9 SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT ENGINEERING RELATED EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM NON-RESTART JUSTIFICATION | |||
SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT ENGINEERING RELATED EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM NON-RESTART JUSTIFICATION | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
SUBCATEGORY / ELEMENT 235.4(8) | |||
SUBCATEGORY / ELEMENT | |||
This issue was raised on WBN and is considered generic to SQN due to the similarity of the two plants. | This issue was raised on WBN and is considered generic to SQN due to the similarity of the two plants. | ||
The high voltage cables referenced in the concern are 480V temporary construction cables. Since these cables have no effect | The high voltage cables referenced in the concern are 480V temporary construction cables. Since these cables have no effect A | ||
on plant safety, they are not considered a restart issue. | |||
4 ATTACHMEN1: | m | ||
Date: | ') | ||
4 ATTACHMEN1: | |||
List of Issues for Electrical ELEMENT NO. | |||
235.4(B) | |||
Date: | |||
: 10. /03/86 0 | |||
0154D - Page 2 | 0154D - Page 2 | ||
] | |||
SQN RESTA | ']' | ||
Date: 10/03/86 | p LIST OF ISSUES | ||
Exposed HV Cable Routed without Raceway-Personnel Hazard | .g. | ||
CONCERN NUMBER (S) | SQN RESTA NO ELEENT NupeER 235.4 BY: | ||
situation exists at SQN. | I. Don-Doncow Date: 10/03/86 | ||
around edge of rooms (such as raceway in Reactor #2) without | *t' | ||
+ ' | |||
sulation. These areas are'of ten | Exposed HV Cable Routed without Raceway-Personnel Hazard ELEENT idHERE RESPON-CONCERN NUMBER (S) | ||
flooded, and could pose a threat of shock hazard to workers if | ISSUES ADDRESSED SIBLE GENERAL' APPROACH / METHODOLOGY FOR ELEMNT REPORT IN-85-749-001 1. | ||
4 | High vdtage cables laid unprotected 235.4 RP 1. | ||
DOCU;fNTS NEEDED FOR REVIEW | Perform walkdown to determine whether this N gh voltage cables are laid around edge of rooms, situation exists at SQN. | ||
around edge of rooms (such as raceway in Reactor #2) without 2. | |||
Damage to insulation of these cables 235.4 RP | |||
- 2. | |||
Discuss with Safety Engineer their program to | |||
' protection from damage to in-along with floodings may result in enforce good housekeeping requirements. | |||
sulation. These areas are'of ten personnel hazard. | |||
flooded, and could pose a threat of shock hazard to workers if 3. | |||
Review copy of housekeeping requirements, insulation were damaged. | |||
4 Review Employee Safety Handbook. | |||
DOCU;fNTS NEEDED FOR REVIEW 1. | |||
Housekeeping requirements procram - SQA66 Rev. 8. | |||
2. | |||
TVA, Office of Nuclear Power, Employee Safety Handbook. | |||
= | |||
0978d-7 | 0978d-7 | ||
,}} | |||
Latest revision as of 22:48, 3 December 2024
| ML20215D911 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 12/08/1986 |
| From: | Mcnutt G, Nesbitt P, Stewart D TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20215D785 | List: |
| References | |
| 235.4-(B), 235.4-(B)-R01, 235.4-(B)-R1, NUDOCS 8612170124 | |
| Download: ML20215D911 (3) | |
Text
yY TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER:
235.4(B)
SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT TYPE:
SEQUOYAH ELEMENT REVISION NUMBER: 1 NON-RESTART JUSTIFICATION
SUMMARY
TITLE:
Exposed HV Cable Routed without Raceway-Personnel Hazard PAGE 1 0F 2 REASON FOR REVISION:
Revised per TVA coments.
i PREPARATION PREPARED 8 -
"d b
/O[d2//Pc;,
.ew,
/
/
4ISNATURE DATE (C
REVIEWS MiT~
id 5
SIGNATURE DATE TAS
/7 (f
SIGNATURE DATE CONCURRENCES Ye f i
/fqrf(,
CEG-H:
W*
/0 '2y-r6 SRP:
I
/2-8-66 SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE
- DATE APPROVED BY:
Mofa4fd iz-ss a
$I ECSPMANA$1 DATE MANAGER OF NUCLEAR POWER DATE CONCURRENCE (FINAL REPORT ONLY)
- SRP Secretary'e signature denotes SRP concurrences are in files.
10/21/86 - 01540 hok OO h7 J
P
.9 SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT ENGINEERING RELATED EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM NON-RESTART JUSTIFICATION
SUMMARY
SUBCATEGORY / ELEMENT 235.4(8)
This issue was raised on WBN and is considered generic to SQN due to the similarity of the two plants.
The high voltage cables referenced in the concern are 480V temporary construction cables. Since these cables have no effect A
on plant safety, they are not considered a restart issue.
m
')
4 ATTACHMEN1:
List of Issues for Electrical ELEMENT NO.
235.4(B)
Date:
- 10. /03/86 0
0154D - Page 2
]
']'
p LIST OF ISSUES
.g.
SQN RESTA NO ELEENT NupeER 235.4 BY:
I. Don-Doncow Date: 10/03/86
- t'
+ '
Exposed HV Cable Routed without Raceway-Personnel Hazard ELEENT idHERE RESPON-CONCERN NUMBER (S)
ISSUES ADDRESSED SIBLE GENERAL' APPROACH / METHODOLOGY FOR ELEMNT REPORT IN-85-749-001 1.
High vdtage cables laid unprotected 235.4 RP 1.
Perform walkdown to determine whether this N gh voltage cables are laid around edge of rooms, situation exists at SQN.
around edge of rooms (such as raceway in Reactor #2) without 2.
Damage to insulation of these cables 235.4 RP
- 2.
Discuss with Safety Engineer their program to
' protection from damage to in-along with floodings may result in enforce good housekeeping requirements.
sulation. These areas are'of ten personnel hazard.
flooded, and could pose a threat of shock hazard to workers if 3.
Review copy of housekeeping requirements, insulation were damaged.
4 Review Employee Safety Handbook.
DOCU;fNTS NEEDED FOR REVIEW 1.
Housekeeping requirements procram - SQA66 Rev. 8.
2.
TVA, Office of Nuclear Power, Employee Safety Handbook.
=
0978d-7
,