ML24064A132: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:March 4, 2024 | ||
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
In the Matter of ) Docket No. NRC-2023-0192 | |||
) | |||
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO. ) | |||
) | |||
License Renewal Application; Pacific ) | |||
Gas & Electric Company; Diablo ) | |||
Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 ) | |||
and 2 | |||
Request of the California Energy Commission To Participate as Non-Party Pursuant To 10 C.F.R. § 2.315(c) | |||
I. Introduction | |||
The California Energy Commission (CEC) respectfully requests to participate as | |||
an interested governmental entity pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.315(c), in the U.S. Nuclear | |||
Regulatory Commission (NRC) proceeding concerning the Pacific Gas & Electric | |||
Companys (PG&E) license renewal application (LRA) for Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power | |||
Plant (DCPP), units 1 and 2, filed pursuant to part 54 of title 10 of the Code of Federal | |||
Regulations to be operated within the State of California (NRC -2023- 0192; Units 1 and 2 | |||
are assigned docket numbers, 50-275 and 50- 323, for Facility Operating License Nos. | |||
DPR-80 and DPR -82, respectively). The DCPP currently supplies approximately 17 | |||
percent of California's zero-carbon electricity supply and 8.6 percent of California's total | |||
electricity supply. 1 The DCPP's two units are scheduled to be retired in 2024 and 2025. 2 | |||
The State of California passed Senate Bill 846 (2022) to p reserve the option of continued | |||
operations of the DCPP for an additional five years beyond 2025 because doing so may be | |||
1 Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 25548(a). See also SB 846 (Chapter 239, Statutes of 2022). | |||
2 Id. | |||
- 1 - | |||
necessary to improve statewide energy system reliability and to reduce the emissions of | |||
greenhouse gases while additional renewable energy and zero-carbon resources come | |||
online, until those new renewable energy and zero-carbon resources are adequate to meet | |||
demand. 3 It is the official policy of the State of California that seeking to extend the DCPP 's | |||
operations for a renewed license term is prudent, cost effective, and in the best interests of | |||
all California electricity customers. 4 | |||
II. Background | |||
On September 2, 2022, Governor Newsom signed Senate Bill 846 (Chapter 239, | |||
Statutes of 2022), which, among other things, requires the California Public Utilities | |||
Commission (CPUC) to set new retirement dates for the Diablo Canyon Power Plant | |||
(DCPP) and provides a pathway for all other state agencies involved in approving | |||
extended operations of DCPP to do so. O n November 7, 2023, PG&E submitted an | |||
operating LRA to the NRCto extend the current Facility Operating Licenses for the | |||
DCPP, units 1 and 2, for 20 years beyond the current expiration dates, as well as a | |||
renewal of the authorization for receipt, possession, and use of nuclear material included | |||
in the operating licenses. 5 | |||
On December 14, 2023, the CPUC issued Decision 23-12- 036 conditionally | |||
approving extended operations at DCPP for five years pursuant to SB 846. 6 One | |||
condition was that the NRC extend the DCPPs operating licenses. | |||
3 Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 25548(b). | |||
4 Id. | |||
5 Although PG&E has applied for a standard 20-year extension, the two units at issue are only currently authorized by California law to operate until 2030. SB 846 (Chapter 239, Statutes of 2022). | |||
6 The decision can be found at https://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/PublishedDocs/Efile/G000/M525/K361/525361857.PDF. | |||
- 2 - | |||
On December 19, 2023, the NRC determined PG&Es DCPP renewal application | |||
was complete and contained sufficient information for the agency to formally docket the | |||
application and begin its review. (88 Fed. Reg. 87817 (Dec. 19, 2023).) This notice | |||
establishesthat any person (petitioner) whose interest may be affected by this action | |||
may file a request for a hearing and petition for leave to intervene (petition) with respect | |||
to the action by March 4, 2024. ( Id. at 87818.) | |||
III. Discussion | |||
The CEC requests to participate in this matter to ensure that the State's interest in | |||
the areas of public health and safety, natural resources, and electrical system reliability are | |||
protected. The CEC has been the State of California's State Liaison to the NRC since 1983 | |||
and coordinates California agencies' policy positions in federal proceedings affecting the | |||
State of California, such as the previously proposed High-Level Waste Repository at Yucca | |||
Mountain and federal nuclear waste transportation programs. | |||
A hearing on this matter will directly involve issues that affect the State, and as the | |||
agency designated to coordinate State concerns regarding nuclear matters, the CEC seeks | |||
to participate in the proceedings as a State representative. California law allows the CEC | |||
to participate in federal proceedings and represent the interest of the CEC (Public | |||
Resources Code § 25219 and § 25220). Currently, the CEC does not intend to take a | |||
position on all issues before the NRC but does wish to participate in the proceedings to | |||
assist in developing a sound record that addresses issues of statewide importance. | |||
The CEC has an interest in participating in any hearing on the LRA for DCPP, units | |||
1 and 2, and a responsibility to ensure that the interests of California citizens are addressed | |||
in these proceedings.California statute provides: | |||
- 3 - | |||
The Legislature hereby finds and declares that electrical energy is essential to the health, safety and welfare of the people of this state and to the state economy, and that it is the responsibility of state government to ensure that a reliable supply of electrical energy is maintained at a level consistent with the need for such energy for protection of public health and safety, for promotion of the general welfare and for environmental quality protection. | |||
(California Public Resources Code § 25001.) | |||
DCPP produces approximately 2200 MW of electricity and is located at a critical location | |||
in the statewide grid. The State of California has an interest in maintaining a reliable | |||
electrical system, while ensuring that the quality of the environment and public health and | |||
safety are protected. Specifically, it is the policy of the State of California that seeking to | |||
extend the DCPPs operations for a renewed license term is prudent, cost effective, and in | |||
the best interests of all California electricity customers. 7 The LRA proceedings are highly | |||
likely to have material impacts in one or all these areas. The NRC "has long recognized the | |||
benefits of participation in its proceedings by representatives of interested States". | |||
(Power Authority of the State of New York, et. al. (James FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant; | |||
Indian Point, Unit 3), CLI 22, 52 NRC 266, 295 (2000), quoting Niagara Mohawk | |||
Power Corp. (Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2), CLI 30, 50 NRC 333, | |||
334 (1999).) Further, the CEC is an affected governing body that has not been admitted as | |||
a party under 10 C.F.R. § 2.309 and should be afforded a reasonable opportunity to | |||
participate in a hearing when one takes place. 10 C.F.R. § 2.315(c). | |||
The PG&E LRA for the DCPP, units 1 and 2, could raise public health and safety, | |||
environmental, and electrical reliability questions. These are all issues that warrant a state | |||
presence in the decision-making process. No other State of California agency has | |||
intervened in this proceeding to represent these interests. For these reasons, the CEC should | |||
7 Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 25548(b). | |||
- 4 - | |||
be permitted to represent the interests of the State of California in this matter as a non - | |||
party. | |||
IV. Conclusion | |||
For the reasons stated above, the CEC requests to participate in the above-captioned | |||
proceedings as a governmental entity pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.315(c). | |||
LISA DeCARLO, Acting Chief Counsel ALLAN WARD, Assistant Chief Counsel DEVIN BLACK, Staff Counsel | |||
Dated: March 4, 2024 DEVIN BLACK, Staff Counsel | |||
Attorneys for California Energy Commission Chief Counsels Office 715 P Street Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 314-0076 | |||
Communication and service of proceedings should be made to the following: | |||
Justin Cochran Nuclear Policy Advisor California Energy Commission 715 P Street Sacramento, CA 95814 justin.cochran@energy.ca.gov | |||
Devin Black, Staff Counsel California Energy Commission Chief Counsels Office 715 P Street Sacramento, CA 95814 devin.black@energy.ca.gov | |||
DESIGNATION FOR SERVICE | |||
I, Devin Black, hereby certify that service of documents related to the foregoing Request of the California Energy Commission to Participate as a Non -Party Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. | |||
§ 2.315(c) may be served upon the following persons by electronic means or United States mail, first class. | |||
Service may be made at the following addresses: | |||
Devin Black, Staff Counsel California Energy Commission Chief Counsels Office 715 P Street Sacramento, CA 95814 devin.black@energy.ca.gov | |||
Dated: March 4, 2024 | |||
Signature | |||
}} |
Revision as of 13:39, 5 October 2024
ML24064A132 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Diablo Canyon |
Issue date: | 03/04/2024 |
From: | Black D State of CA, Energy Commission |
To: | NRC/OCM |
SECY RAS | |
References | |
RAS 56939, 50-275 LR-2, 50-323 LR-2, NRC-2023-0192 | |
Download: ML24064A132 (0) | |
Text
March 4, 2024
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
In the Matter of ) Docket No. NRC-2023-0192
)
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO. )
)
License Renewal Application; Pacific )
Gas & Electric Company; Diablo )
Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 )
and 2
Request of the California Energy Commission To Participate as Non-Party Pursuant To 10 C.F.R. § 2.315(c)
I. Introduction
The California Energy Commission (CEC) respectfully requests to participate as
an interested governmental entity pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.315(c), in the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) proceeding concerning the Pacific Gas & Electric
Companys (PG&E) license renewal application (LRA) for Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power
Plant (DCPP), units 1 and 2, filed pursuant to part 54 of title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations to be operated within the State of California (NRC -2023- 0192; Units 1 and 2
are assigned docket numbers, 50-275 and 50- 323, for Facility Operating License Nos.
DPR-80 and DPR -82, respectively). The DCPP currently supplies approximately 17
percent of California's zero-carbon electricity supply and 8.6 percent of California's total
electricity supply. 1 The DCPP's two units are scheduled to be retired in 2024 and 2025. 2
The State of California passed Senate Bill 846 (2022) to p reserve the option of continued
operations of the DCPP for an additional five years beyond 2025 because doing so may be
1 Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 25548(a). See also SB 846 (Chapter 239, Statutes of 2022).
2 Id.
- 1 -
necessary to improve statewide energy system reliability and to reduce the emissions of
greenhouse gases while additional renewable energy and zero-carbon resources come
online, until those new renewable energy and zero-carbon resources are adequate to meet
demand. 3 It is the official policy of the State of California that seeking to extend the DCPP 's
operations for a renewed license term is prudent, cost effective, and in the best interests of
all California electricity customers. 4
II. Background
On September 2, 2022, Governor Newsom signed Senate Bill 846 (Chapter 239,
Statutes of 2022), which, among other things, requires the California Public Utilities
Commission (CPUC) to set new retirement dates for the Diablo Canyon Power Plant
(DCPP) and provides a pathway for all other state agencies involved in approving
extended operations of DCPP to do so. O n November 7, 2023, PG&E submitted an
operating LRA to the NRCto extend the current Facility Operating Licenses for the
DCPP, units 1 and 2, for 20 years beyond the current expiration dates, as well as a
renewal of the authorization for receipt, possession, and use of nuclear material included
in the operating licenses. 5
On December 14, 2023, the CPUC issued Decision 23-12- 036 conditionally
approving extended operations at DCPP for five years pursuant to SB 846. 6 One
condition was that the NRC extend the DCPPs operating licenses.
3 Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 25548(b).
4 Id.
5 Although PG&E has applied for a standard 20-year extension, the two units at issue are only currently authorized by California law to operate until 2030. SB 846 (Chapter 239, Statutes of 2022).
6 The decision can be found at https://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/PublishedDocs/Efile/G000/M525/K361/525361857.PDF.
- 2 -
On December 19, 2023, the NRC determined PG&Es DCPP renewal application
was complete and contained sufficient information for the agency to formally docket the
application and begin its review. (88 Fed. Reg. 87817 (Dec. 19, 2023).) This notice
establishesthat any person (petitioner) whose interest may be affected by this action
may file a request for a hearing and petition for leave to intervene (petition) with respect
to the action by March 4, 2024. ( Id. at 87818.)
III. Discussion
The CEC requests to participate in this matter to ensure that the State's interest in
the areas of public health and safety, natural resources, and electrical system reliability are
protected. The CEC has been the State of California's State Liaison to the NRC since 1983
and coordinates California agencies' policy positions in federal proceedings affecting the
State of California, such as the previously proposed High-Level Waste Repository at Yucca
Mountain and federal nuclear waste transportation programs.
A hearing on this matter will directly involve issues that affect the State, and as the
agency designated to coordinate State concerns regarding nuclear matters, the CEC seeks
to participate in the proceedings as a State representative. California law allows the CEC
to participate in federal proceedings and represent the interest of the CEC (Public
Resources Code § 25219 and § 25220). Currently, the CEC does not intend to take a
position on all issues before the NRC but does wish to participate in the proceedings to
assist in developing a sound record that addresses issues of statewide importance.
The CEC has an interest in participating in any hearing on the LRA for DCPP, units
1 and 2, and a responsibility to ensure that the interests of California citizens are addressed
in these proceedings.California statute provides:
- 3 -
The Legislature hereby finds and declares that electrical energy is essential to the health, safety and welfare of the people of this state and to the state economy, and that it is the responsibility of state government to ensure that a reliable supply of electrical energy is maintained at a level consistent with the need for such energy for protection of public health and safety, for promotion of the general welfare and for environmental quality protection.
(California Public Resources Code § 25001.)
DCPP produces approximately 2200 MW of electricity and is located at a critical location
in the statewide grid. The State of California has an interest in maintaining a reliable
electrical system, while ensuring that the quality of the environment and public health and
safety are protected. Specifically, it is the policy of the State of California that seeking to
extend the DCPPs operations for a renewed license term is prudent, cost effective, and in
the best interests of all California electricity customers. 7 The LRA proceedings are highly
likely to have material impacts in one or all these areas. The NRC "has long recognized the
benefits of participation in its proceedings by representatives of interested States".
(Power Authority of the State of New York, et. al. (James FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant;
Indian Point, Unit 3), CLI 22, 52 NRC 266, 295 (2000), quoting Niagara Mohawk
Power Corp. (Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2), CLI 30, 50 NRC 333,
334 (1999).) Further, the CEC is an affected governing body that has not been admitted as
a party under 10 C.F.R. § 2.309 and should be afforded a reasonable opportunity to
participate in a hearing when one takes place. 10 C.F.R. § 2.315(c).
The PG&E LRA for the DCPP, units 1 and 2, could raise public health and safety,
environmental, and electrical reliability questions. These are all issues that warrant a state
presence in the decision-making process. No other State of California agency has
intervened in this proceeding to represent these interests. For these reasons, the CEC should
7 Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 25548(b).
- 4 -
be permitted to represent the interests of the State of California in this matter as a non -
party.
IV. Conclusion
For the reasons stated above, the CEC requests to participate in the above-captioned
proceedings as a governmental entity pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.315(c).
LISA DeCARLO, Acting Chief Counsel ALLAN WARD, Assistant Chief Counsel DEVIN BLACK, Staff Counsel
Dated: March 4, 2024 DEVIN BLACK, Staff Counsel
Attorneys for California Energy Commission Chief Counsels Office 715 P Street Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 314-0076
Communication and service of proceedings should be made to the following:
Justin Cochran Nuclear Policy Advisor California Energy Commission 715 P Street Sacramento, CA 95814 justin.cochran@energy.ca.gov
Devin Black, Staff Counsel California Energy Commission Chief Counsels Office 715 P Street Sacramento, CA 95814 devin.black@energy.ca.gov
DESIGNATION FOR SERVICE
I, Devin Black, hereby certify that service of documents related to the foregoing Request of the California Energy Commission to Participate as a Non -Party Pursuant to 10 C.F.R.
§ 2.315(c) may be served upon the following persons by electronic means or United States mail, first class.
Service may be made at the following addresses:
Devin Black, Staff Counsel California Energy Commission Chief Counsels Office 715 P Street Sacramento, CA 95814 devin.black@energy.ca.gov
Dated: March 4, 2024
Signature