ML24086A424: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:[7590- | {{#Wiki_filter:[7590- 01-P] | ||
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ||
[Docket Nos. 72-1041 | [Docket Nos. 72-1041, 50-498, and 50 -499; NRC-2024- 0104] | ||
South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company; | South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company; | ||
South Texas Project Electric Generating Station, | South Texas Project Electric Generating Station, Units 1 and 2; | ||
Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation; | Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation; | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) | : The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued an exemption to | ||
South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company permitting South Texas Project | South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company permitting South Texas Project | ||
Electric Generating Station | Electric Generating Station to shuffle (relocate) 10 already loaded model 37 multi- | ||
purpose canisters (MPC) | purpose canisters (MPC) with continuous basket shim s (MPC-37-CBS) in January 2025 | ||
and to load two new MPC | and to load two new MPC CBS in the HI-STORM Flood/Wind MPC Storage System | ||
at its South Texas Project Electric | at its South Texas Project Electric Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 independent spent | ||
fuel storage installation in a storage condition where | fuel storage installation in a storage condition where the terms, conditions, and | ||
specifications in the Certificate of Compliance No. 1032, Amendment No. 2 | specifications in the Certificate of Compliance No. 1032, Amendment No. 2, are not met. | ||
DATES: The exemption was issued on June 26, 2024 | DATES: The exemption was issued on June 26, 2024. | ||
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC- | ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2024- 0104 when contacting the NRC | ||
about the availability of information regarding this document. You may obtain publicly | about the availability of information regarding this document. You may obtain publicly | ||
available information related to this document using any of the following methods: | available information related to this document using any of the following methods: | ||
* Federal Rulemaking Webs | * Federal Rulemaking Webs ite: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and | ||
search for Docket ID NRC-2024- | search for Docket ID NRC-2024- 0104. Address questions about D ocket IDs in | ||
Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann; telephone: 301- | Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann; telephone: 301-415- 0624; email: | ||
Stacy.Schumann@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the | Stacy.Schumann@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the | ||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the ADAMS Public | (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the ADAMS Public | ||
Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading- | Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the | ||
search, select | search, select Begin Web-based ADAMS Search. For problems with ADAMS, please | ||
contact the NRCs Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1- | contact the NRCs Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, at | ||
301- | 301-415-4737, or by email to PDR. Resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number | ||
for each document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that it | for each document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that it | ||
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
available documents, is open by appointment. To make an appointment to visit the PDR, | available documents, is open by appointment. To make an appointment to visit the PDR, | ||
please send an email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov or call 1- | please send an email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov or call 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415- | ||
4737, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. eastern time (ET), Monday through Friday, except | 4737, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. eastern time (ET), Monday through Friday, except | ||
Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555; | Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555; | ||
telephone: 301-415- | telephone: 301-415-1018; email: Yen -Ju.Chen@nrc.gov. | ||
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the exemption is attached. | SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the exemption is attached. | ||
Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. | For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. | ||
/RA/ | |||
Yoira Diaz-Sanabria, Chief, Storage and Transportation Licensing Branch, Division of Fuel Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety, and Safeguards. | Yoira Diaz-Sanabria, Chief, Storage and Transportation Licensing Branch, Division of Fuel Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety, and Safeguards. | ||
2 Attachment - | 2 Attachment - Exemption | ||
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ||
Docket Nos. 72- | Docket Nos. 72-1041, 50-498, and 50 -499 | ||
South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company | South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company | ||
South Texas Project Electric Generating Station | South Texas Project Electric Generating Station Units 1 and 2 | ||
Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation; | Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation; | ||
Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company (STPNOC) is the holder of | South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company (STPNOC) is the holder of | ||
Facility Operating License Nos. NPF- | Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-76 and NPF-80, which authorize operation of the | ||
South Texas Project Electric Generating Station (STP), Units 1 and 2 in Bay City | South Texas Project Electric Generating Station (STP), Units 1 and 2 in Bay City, Texas, | ||
pursuant to Part 50 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations | pursuant to Part 50 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Domestic | ||
Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities. The licenses provide, among other | Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities. The licenses provide, among other | ||
Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
STPNOC is authorized to operate nuclear power reactors under 10 CFR part 50 and | STPNOC is authorized to operate nuclear power reactors under 10 CFR part 50 and | ||
holds a 10 | holds a 10 CFR part 72 general license for storage of spent fuel at the STP ISFSI. Under | ||
the terms of the general license, STPNOC | the terms of the general license, STPNOC stores spent fuel at its STP ISFSI using the | ||
HI-STORM Flood/Wind ( | HI-STORM Flood/Wind ( FW) Multi-Purpose Canister (MPC) Storage System in | ||
accordance with Certificate of Compliance (CoC) No. 1032, Amendment No. 2. | accordance with Certificate of Compliance (CoC) No. 1032, Amendment No. 2. | ||
3 II. | 3 II. Request/Action | ||
By a {{letter dated|date=May 7, 2024|text=letter dated May 7, 2024}} (Agencywide Documents Access and Management | By a {{letter dated|date=May 7, 2024|text=letter dated May 7, 2024}} (Agencywide Documents Access and Management | ||
System [ADAMS] Accession No. ML24128A157), | System [ADAMS] Accession No. ML24128A157), and supplemented on March 15, 2024 | ||
(ML24136A284), STPNOC | (ML24136A284), STPNOC requested an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR §§ | ||
72.212(a)(2), 72.212(b)(3), 72.212(b)(5)(i), 72.212(b)(11), and 72.214 that require STP | 72.212(a)(2), 72.212(b)(3), 72.212(b)(5)(i), 72.212(b)(11), and 72.214 that require STP | ||
Line 166: | Line 166: | ||
to comply with the terms, conditions, and specifications of the CoC No. 1032, | to comply with the terms, conditions, and specifications of the CoC No. 1032, | ||
Amendment No. 2 ( | Amendment No. 2 ( ML16280A008). If approved, STPNOC s exemption request would | ||
accordingly allow STP | accordingly allow STP to shuffle (relocate) 10 loaded and to load two Multi-Purpose | ||
Canisters (MPC) with continuous basket shims (CBS) (i.e., MPC | Canisters (MPC) with continuous basket shims (CBS) (i.e., MPC CBS), an | ||
unapproved, variant basket design, in the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System, and | unapproved, variant basket design, in the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System, and | ||
Line 176: | Line 176: | ||
thus, to load the systems in a storage condition where the terms, conditions, and | thus, to load the systems in a storage condition where the terms, conditions, and | ||
specifications in the CoC No. 1032, Amendment No. 2 | specifications in the CoC No. 1032, Amendment No. 2, are not met. | ||
STPNOC currently uses the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System under CoC | STPNOC currently uses the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System under CoC | ||
No. 1032, Amendment No. 2 | No. 1032, Amendment No. 2, for dry storage of spent nuclear fuel in the MPC-37 at the | ||
STP | STP ISFSI. Holtec International (Holtec), the designer and manufacturer of the HI- | ||
STORM FW MPC Storage System, developed a variant of the design with CBS for the | STORM FW MPC Storage System, developed a variant of the design with CBS for the | ||
MPC-37, known as MPC | MPC-37, known as MPC CBS. Holtec performed a non-mechanistic tip-over analysis | ||
with favorable results and implemented the CBS variant design under the provisions of | with favorable results and implemented the CBS variant design under the provisions of | ||
Line 194: | Line 194: | ||
changes to cask designs without a CoC amendment under certain conditions (listed in | changes to cask designs without a CoC amendment under certain conditions (listed in | ||
10 | 10 CFR 72.48(c)). After evaluating the specific changes to the cask designs, the NRC | ||
determined that Holtec erred when it implemented the CBS variant design under 10 CFR | determined that Holtec erred when it implemented the CBS variant design under 10 CFR | ||
Line 202: | Line 202: | ||
reason, the NRC issued three Severity Level IV violations to Holtec (ML24016A190). | reason, the NRC issued three Severity Level IV violations to Holtec (ML24016A190). | ||
4 STPNOC has near-term plans to shuffle (relocate) 10 already loaded MPC CBS on the STP ISFSI pad in January 2025 and load two new MPC | 4 STPNOC has near-term plans to shuffle (relocate) 10 already loaded MPC CBS on the STP ISFSI pad in January 2025 and load two new MPC CBS in the HI- | ||
STORM FW MPC Storage System in March 2025. While Holtec was required to submit | STORM FW MPC Storage System in March 2025. While Holtec was required to submit | ||
Line 212: | Line 212: | ||
loading campaign. Therefore, STPNOC submitted this exemption request in order to | loading campaign. Therefore, STPNOC submitted this exemption request in order to | ||
allow for the shuffling of 10 already loaded MPC | allow for the shuffling of 10 already loaded MPC CBS in January 2025, and the future | ||
loading of two MPC | loading of two MPC CBS in March 2025 at the STP ISFSI. This exemption is limited | ||
to the use of MPC | to the use of MPC CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System only for shuffling | ||
the 10 already loaded canisters and specific near | the 10 already loaded canisters and specific near -term planned loading of two new | ||
canisters using the MPC | canisters using the MPC CBS variant basket design. | ||
III. Discussion | III. Discussion | ||
Line 228: | Line 228: | ||
application by any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant such exemptions | application by any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant such exemptions | ||
from the requirements of the regulations of 10 | from the requirements of the regulations of 10 CFR part 72 as it determines are | ||
authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and | authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and | ||
Line 234: | Line 234: | ||
security and are otherwise in the public interest. | security and are otherwise in the public interest. | ||
A. | A. The Exemption is Authorized by Law | ||
This exemption would allow STPNOC | This exemption would allow STPNOC to shuffle (relocate) 10 already loaded and | ||
to load two MPC | to load two MPC CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System, in January and | ||
March 2025, respectively, at its STP | March 2025, respectively, at its STP ISFSI in a storage condition where the terms, | ||
conditions, and specifications in the CoC No. 1032, Amendment No. 2 | conditions, and specifications in the CoC No. 1032, Amendment No. 2, are not met. | ||
STPNOC is requesting an exemption from the provisions in 10 CFR part 72 that require | STPNOC is requesting an exemption from the provisions in 10 CFR part 72 that require | ||
Line 248: | Line 248: | ||
the licensee to comply with the terms, conditions, and specifications of the CoC for the | the licensee to comply with the terms, conditions, and specifications of the CoC for the | ||
approved cask model it uses. Section 72.7 allows the | approved cask model it uses. Section 72.7 allows the NRC to grant exemptions from the | ||
5 requirements of 10 | 5 requirements of 10 CFR part 72. This authority to grant exemptions is consistent with the | ||
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and is not otherwise inconsistent with NRCs | Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and is not otherwise inconsistent with NRCs | ||
Line 262: | Line 262: | ||
authorized to grant the exemption by law. | authorized to grant the exemption by law. | ||
B. | B. The Exemption Will Not Endanger Life or Property or the Common Defense | ||
and Security | and Security | ||
Line 268: | Line 268: | ||
This exemption would allow STPNOC to shuffle (relocate) 10 already loaded | This exemption would allow STPNOC to shuffle (relocate) 10 already loaded | ||
MPC | MPC CBS in January 2025 and to load two MPC CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC | ||
Storage System in March 2025, at the STP ISFSI in a storage condition where the | Storage System in March 2025, at the STP ISFSI in a storage condition where the | ||
Line 276: | Line 276: | ||
met. In support of its exemption request, STPNOC asserts that issuance of the | met. In support of its exemption request, STPNOC asserts that issuance of the | ||
exemption would not endanger life or property because a tip- | exemption would not endanger life or property because a tip-over or handling event is | ||
administratively controlled, and that the containment boundary would be maintained in | administratively controlled, and that the containment boundary would be maintained in | ||
Line 288: | Line 288: | ||
against Holtec regarding this violation, there was any need to take an immediate action | against Holtec regarding this violation, there was any need to take an immediate action | ||
for the cask systems that were already loaded with non- | for the cask systems that were already loaded with non-compliant basket designs. The | ||
Safety Determination Memorandum documents a risk-informed approach concluding | Safety Determination Memorandum documents a risk-informed approach concluding | ||
that, during the design basis event of a non-mechanistic tip- | that, during the design basis event of a non-mechanistic tip-over, the fuel in the basket in | ||
the MPC | the MPC CBS remains in a subcritical condition. | ||
STPNOC also provided site- | STPNOC also provided site-specific technical information, including information | ||
explaining why the use of the approach in the NRCs Safety Determination | explaining why the use of the approach in the NRCs Safety Determination | ||
Line 312: | Line 312: | ||
System CoC No. 1032, Amendment 2, that is used at the STP site. STPNOC stated the | System CoC No. 1032, Amendment 2, that is used at the STP site. STPNOC stated the | ||
transporter for handling of the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System at the STP | transporter for handling of the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System at the STP ISFSI | ||
meets the design requirements described in the CoC No. 1032 | meets the design requirements described in the CoC No. 1032 technical specifications | ||
5.2.c. | 5.2.c. | ||
Line 320: | Line 320: | ||
Additionally, STPNOC provided specific information from STPs 72.212 | Additionally, STPNOC provided specific information from STPs 72.212 | ||
Evaluation Report, Revision 3 | Evaluation Report, Revision 3, indicating the calculated dose rate is in compliance with | ||
10 CFR 72.104(a), Criteria for radioactive materials in effluents and direct radiation from | 10 CFR 72.104(a), Criteria for radioactive materials in effluents and direct radiation from | ||
an ISFSI or MRS. The analysis of a | an ISFSI or MRS. The analysis of a design basis accident scenario also demonstrates | ||
compliance with 72.106, Controlled area of an ISFSI or MRS. Specifically, STPNOC | compliance with 72.106, Controlled area of an ISFSI or MRS. Specifically, STPNOC | ||
stated that, as described in section 12.2 of HI | stated that, as described in section 12.2 of HI -STORM FW MPC Storage System | ||
UFSAR, there are no accidents which could significantly affect shielding effectiveness of | UFSAR, there are no accidents which could significantly affect shielding effectiveness of | ||
the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System. Coupled with the distance of the STP | the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System. Coupled with the distance of the STP ISFSI to | ||
the site area boundary, STPNOC concluded that compliance with 72.104 and 72.106 is | the site area boundary, STPNOC concluded that compliance with 72.104 and 72.106 is | ||
Line 342: | Line 342: | ||
that issuance of the exemption would not endanger life or property because the | that issuance of the exemption would not endanger life or property because the | ||
administrative controls STPNOC | administrative controls STPNOC has in place at the STP ISFSI sufficiently minimize the | ||
possibility of a tip-over or handling event, and that the containment boundary would be | possibility of a tip-over or handling event, and that the containment boundary would be | ||
Line 348: | Line 348: | ||
maintained in such an event. The staff confirmed that these administrative controls | maintained in such an event. The staff confirmed that these administrative controls | ||
comply with the technical specifications and | comply with the technical specifications and UFSAR for the HI-STORM FW MPC | ||
7 Storage System CoC No. 1032, Amendment 2 | 7 Storage System CoC No. 1032, Amendment 2, that is used at the STP site. In addition, | ||
the staff confirmed that | the staff confirmed that the information provided by STPNOC regarding STPs 72.212 | ||
Evaluation Report, Revision 3 | Evaluation Report, Revision 3, demonstrates that the consequences of normal and | ||
accident conditions would be | accident conditions would be within the regulatory limits of the 10 CFR 72.104 and 10 | ||
CFR 72.106. The staff also determined that the requested exemption is not related to | CFR 72.106. The staff also determined that the requested exemption is not related to | ||
any aspect of the physical security or defense of the STP | any aspect of the physical security or defense of the STP ISFSI; therefore, granting the | ||
exemption would not result in any potential impacts to common defense and security. | exemption would not result in any potential impacts to common defense and security. | ||
Line 372: | Line 372: | ||
or property or the common defense and security. | or property or the common defense and security. | ||
C. | C. The Exemption is Otherwise in the Public Interest | ||
The proposed exemption would allow STPNOC to shuffle (relocate) 10 already | The proposed exemption would allow STPNOC to shuffle (relocate) 10 already | ||
loaded MPC | loaded MPC CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System on the ISFSI pad at | ||
the STP ISFSI in January 2025, and load two MPC | the STP ISFSI in January 2025, and load two MPC CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC | ||
Storage System in March 2025 at the STP ISFSI, even though the CBS variant basket | Storage System in March 2025 at the STP ISFSI, even though the CBS variant basket | ||
Line 386: | Line 386: | ||
STPNOC, the exemption is in the public interest because being able to load the two | STPNOC, the exemption is in the public interest because being able to load the two | ||
MPC | MPC CBS will ensure adequate full core offload margin that is necessary for | ||
completing refueling outages, implementing enterprise projects, and sustaining safe and | completing refueling outages, implementing enterprise projects, and sustaining safe and | ||
Line 410: | Line 410: | ||
based on the additional fuel moves required to manage spent fuel pool loading with extra | based on the additional fuel moves required to manage spent fuel pool loading with extra | ||
assemblies in the pool. STPNOC further stated that the shuffling (relocating) of the | assemblies in the pool. STPNOC further stated that the shuffling (relocating) of the 10 | ||
already loaded MPC | already loaded MPC CBS is necessary to optimize available space on the STP ISFSI | ||
pad for cask transporter maneuverability and minimize long- | pad for cask transporter maneuverability and minimize long-term damage to the STP | ||
ISFSI pad from cask transporter use, and thus ensures long-term safe storage of fuel- | ISFSI pad from cask transporter use, and thus ensures long-term safe storage of fuel- | ||
Line 444: | Line 444: | ||
budgeted, and planned several years in advance based on planned refueling outages, | budgeted, and planned several years in advance based on planned refueling outages, | ||
new fuel receipts, and other enterprise- | new fuel receipts, and other enterprise-level projects while considering the availability of | ||
specialty resources (equipment, vendors) to complete a campaign. Any delay to the | specialty resources (equipment, vendors) to complete a campaign. Any delay to the | ||
Line 470: | Line 470: | ||
have to keep spent fuel in the spent fuel pool since it is not permitted to be loaded into | have to keep spent fuel in the spent fuel pool since it is not permitted to be loaded into | ||
MPC | MPC CBS. This would impact STPNOCs ability to manage the full core offload | ||
margin in STPs spent fuel pool, resulting in undesirable cascading impacts to new fuel | margin in STPs spent fuel pool, resulting in undesirable cascading impacts to new fuel | ||
Line 480: | Line 480: | ||
maneuverability on the STP ISFSI pad, and thus increase the use of a cask transporter | maneuverability on the STP ISFSI pad, and thus increase the use of a cask transporter | ||
on the STP ISFSI pad, which could increase the long- | on the STP ISFSI pad, which could increase the long-term damage to the STP ISFSI | ||
pad and result in likely longer personnel radiation exposure from increased cask | pad and result in likely longer personnel radiation exposure from increased cask | ||
Line 504: | Line 504: | ||
proposed action would not result in any changes in the types or amounts of any | proposed action would not result in any changes in the types or amounts of any | ||
radiological or non- | radiological or non-radiological effluents that may be released offsite, and there would be | ||
no significant increase in occupational or public radiation exposure because of the | no significant increase in occupational or public radiation exposure because of the | ||
Line 510: | Line 510: | ||
proposed action. The environmental assessment and the finding of no significant impact | proposed action. The environmental assessment and the finding of no significant impact | ||
was published on | was published on June 26, 2024 (89 FR 53452). | ||
IV.Conclusion | IV.Conclusion | ||
Line 516: | Line 516: | ||
Based on these considerations, the NRC has determined that, pursuant to | Based on these considerations, the NRC has determined that, pursuant to | ||
10 | 10 CFR 72.7, the exemption is authorized by law, will not endanger life or property or the | ||
common defense and security, and is otherwise in the public interest. Therefore, the | common defense and security, and is otherwise in the public interest. Therefore, the | ||
Line 524: | Line 524: | ||
72.212(b)(3), 72.212(b)(5)(i), 72.212(b)(11), and 72.214 with respect to the shuffling of | 72.212(b)(3), 72.212(b)(5)(i), 72.212(b)(11), and 72.214 with respect to the shuffling of | ||
10 MPC-37-CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System in January 2025 and | 10 MPC-37-CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System in January 2025 and the | ||
future loading in the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System of two MPC-37-CBS in March | future loading in the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System of two MPC-37-CBS in March | ||
2025 | 2025. | ||
This exemption is effective upon issuance. | This exemption is effective upon issuance. | ||
Line 536: | Line 536: | ||
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. | For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. | ||
/RA/ | |||
Christian Jacobs, Acting Chief, Storage and Transportation | Christian Jacobs, Acting Chief, Storage and Transportation Licensing Branch, Division of Fuel Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety, and Safeguards. | ||
11}} | 11}} |
Latest revision as of 08:35, 5 October 2024
ML24086A424 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | South Texas, 07201041 |
Issue date: | 07/01/2024 |
From: | Yoira Diaz-Sanabria Division of Fuel Management |
To: | South Texas |
References | |
NRC-2024-0104 | |
Download: ML24086A424 (1) | |
Text
[7590- 01-P]
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 72-1041, 50-498, and 50 -499; NRC-2024- 0104]
South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company;
South Texas Project Electric Generating Station, Units 1 and 2;
Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation;
Exemption
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice; issuance.
SUMMARY
- The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued an exemption to
South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company permitting South Texas Project
Electric Generating Station to shuffle (relocate) 10 already loaded model 37 multi-
purpose canisters (MPC) with continuous basket shim s (MPC-37-CBS) in January 2025
and to load two new MPC CBS in the HI-STORM Flood/Wind MPC Storage System
at its South Texas Project Electric Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 independent spent
fuel storage installation in a storage condition where the terms, conditions, and
specifications in the Certificate of Compliance No. 1032, Amendment No. 2, are not met.
DATES: The exemption was issued on June 26, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2024- 0104 when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information regarding this document. You may obtain publicly
available information related to this document using any of the following methods:
- Federal Rulemaking Webs ite: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and
search for Docket ID NRC-2024- 0104. Address questions about D ocket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann; telephone: 301-415- 0624; email:
Stacy.Schumann@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the
For Further Information Contact section of this document.
- NRCs Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the ADAMS Public
Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the
search, select Begin Web-based ADAMS Search. For problems with ADAMS, please
contact the NRCs Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, at
301-415-4737, or by email to PDR. Resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number
for each document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that it
is mentioned in this document.
- NRCs PDR: The PDR, where you may examine and order copies of publicly
available documents, is open by appointment. To make an appointment to visit the PDR,
please send an email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov or call 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-
4737, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. eastern time (ET), Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yen-Ju Chen, Office of Nuclear Material
Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555;
telephone: 301-415-1018; email: Yen -Ju.Chen@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the exemption is attached.
Dated: July 1, 2024.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
/RA/
Yoira Diaz-Sanabria, Chief, Storage and Transportation Licensing Branch, Division of Fuel Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety, and Safeguards.
2 Attachment - Exemption
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Docket Nos. 72-1041, 50-498, and 50 -499
South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company
South Texas Project Electric Generating Station Units 1 and 2
Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation;
I. Background
South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company (STPNOC) is the holder of
Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-76 and NPF-80, which authorize operation of the
South Texas Project Electric Generating Station (STP), Units 1 and 2 in Bay City, Texas,
pursuant to Part 50 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Domestic
Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities. The licenses provide, among other
things, that the facility is subject to all rules, regulations, and orders of the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) now or hereafter in effect.
Consistent with 10 CFR part 72, subpart K, General License for Storage of
Spent Fuel at Power Reactor Sites, a general license is issued for the storage of spent
fuel in an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) at power reactor sites to
persons authorized to possess or operate nuclear power reactors under 10 CFR part 50.
STPNOC is authorized to operate nuclear power reactors under 10 CFR part 50 and
holds a 10 CFR part 72 general license for storage of spent fuel at the STP ISFSI. Under
the terms of the general license, STPNOC stores spent fuel at its STP ISFSI using the
HI-STORM Flood/Wind ( FW) Multi-Purpose Canister (MPC) Storage System in
accordance with Certificate of Compliance (CoC) No. 1032, Amendment No. 2.
3 II. Request/Action
By a letter dated May 7, 2024 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management
System [ADAMS] Accession No. ML24128A157), and supplemented on March 15, 2024
(ML24136A284), STPNOC requested an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR §§
72.212(a)(2), 72.212(b)(3), 72.212(b)(5)(i), 72.212(b)(11), and 72.214 that require STP
to comply with the terms, conditions, and specifications of the CoC No. 1032,
Amendment No. 2 ( ML16280A008). If approved, STPNOC s exemption request would
accordingly allow STP to shuffle (relocate) 10 loaded and to load two Multi-Purpose
Canisters (MPC) with continuous basket shims (CBS) (i.e., MPC CBS), an
unapproved, variant basket design, in the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System, and
thus, to load the systems in a storage condition where the terms, conditions, and
specifications in the CoC No. 1032, Amendment No. 2, are not met.
STPNOC currently uses the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System under CoC
No. 1032, Amendment No. 2, for dry storage of spent nuclear fuel in the MPC-37 at the
STP ISFSI. Holtec International (Holtec), the designer and manufacturer of the HI-
STORM FW MPC Storage System, developed a variant of the design with CBS for the
MPC-37, known as MPC CBS. Holtec performed a non-mechanistic tip-over analysis
with favorable results and implemented the CBS variant design under the provisions of
10 CFR 72.48, Changes, tests, and experiments, which allows licensees to make
changes to cask designs without a CoC amendment under certain conditions (listed in
10 CFR 72.48(c)). After evaluating the specific changes to the cask designs, the NRC
determined that Holtec erred when it implemented the CBS variant design under 10 CFR
72.48, as this is not the type of change allowed without a CoC amendment. For this
reason, the NRC issued three Severity Level IV violations to Holtec (ML24016A190).
4 STPNOC has near-term plans to shuffle (relocate) 10 already loaded MPC CBS on the STP ISFSI pad in January 2025 and load two new MPC CBS in the HI-
STORM FW MPC Storage System in March 2025. While Holtec was required to submit
a CoC amendment to the NRC to seek approval of the CBS variant design, such a
process will not be completed in time to inform decisions for this near-term shuffling and
loading campaign. Therefore, STPNOC submitted this exemption request in order to
allow for the shuffling of 10 already loaded MPC CBS in January 2025, and the future
loading of two MPC CBS in March 2025 at the STP ISFSI. This exemption is limited
to the use of MPC CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System only for shuffling
the 10 already loaded canisters and specific near -term planned loading of two new
canisters using the MPC CBS variant basket design.
III. Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 72.7, Specific exemptions, the Commission may, upon
application by any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant such exemptions
from the requirements of the regulations of 10 CFR part 72 as it determines are
authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and
security and are otherwise in the public interest.
A. The Exemption is Authorized by Law
This exemption would allow STPNOC to shuffle (relocate) 10 already loaded and
to load two MPC CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System, in January and
March 2025, respectively, at its STP ISFSI in a storage condition where the terms,
conditions, and specifications in the CoC No. 1032, Amendment No. 2, are not met.
STPNOC is requesting an exemption from the provisions in 10 CFR part 72 that require
the licensee to comply with the terms, conditions, and specifications of the CoC for the
approved cask model it uses. Section 72.7 allows the NRC to grant exemptions from the
5 requirements of 10 CFR part 72. This authority to grant exemptions is consistent with the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and is not otherwise inconsistent with NRCs
regulations or other applicable laws. Additionally, no other law prohibits the activities that
would be authorized by the exemption. Therefore, the NRC concludes that there is no
statutory prohibition on the issuance of the requested exemption, and the NRC is
authorized to grant the exemption by law.
B. The Exemption Will Not Endanger Life or Property or the Common Defense
and Security
This exemption would allow STPNOC to shuffle (relocate) 10 already loaded
MPC CBS in January 2025 and to load two MPC CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC
Storage System in March 2025, at the STP ISFSI in a storage condition where the
terms, conditions, and specifications in the CoC No. 1032, Amendment No. 2, are not
met. In support of its exemption request, STPNOC asserts that issuance of the
exemption would not endanger life or property because a tip-over or handling event is
administratively controlled, and that the containment boundary would be maintained in
such an event. STPNOC relies, in part, on the approach in the NRCs Safety
Determination Memorandum (ML24018A085). The NRC issued this Safety
Determination Memorandum to address whether, with respect to the enforcement action
against Holtec regarding this violation, there was any need to take an immediate action
for the cask systems that were already loaded with non-compliant basket designs. The
Safety Determination Memorandum documents a risk-informed approach concluding
that, during the design basis event of a non-mechanistic tip-over, the fuel in the basket in
the MPC CBS remains in a subcritical condition.
STPNOC also provided site-specific technical information, including information
explaining why the use of the approach in the NRCs Safety Determination
6 Memorandum is appropriate for determining the safe use of the CBS variant baskets at
the STP ISFSI. Specifically, STPNOC described that the analysis of the tip-over design
basis event that is relied upon in the NRCs Safety Determination Memorandum, which
demonstrates that the MPC confinement barrier is maintained, is documented in the
updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR) for the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage
System CoC No. 1032, Amendment 2, that is used at the STP site. STPNOC stated the
transporter for handling of the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System at the STP ISFSI
meets the design requirements described in the CoC No. 1032 technical specifications 5.2.c.
Additionally, STPNOC provided specific information from STPs 72.212
Evaluation Report, Revision 3, indicating the calculated dose rate is in compliance with
10 CFR 72.104(a), Criteria for radioactive materials in effluents and direct radiation from
an ISFSI or MRS. The analysis of a design basis accident scenario also demonstrates
compliance with 72.106, Controlled area of an ISFSI or MRS. Specifically, STPNOC
stated that, as described in section 12.2 of HI -STORM FW MPC Storage System
UFSAR, there are no accidents which could significantly affect shielding effectiveness of
the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System. Coupled with the distance of the STP ISFSI to
the site area boundary, STPNOC concluded that compliance with 72.104 and 72.106 is
not impacted by approving this exemption request.
The NRC staff reviewed the information provided by STPNOC and concludes
that issuance of the exemption would not endanger life or property because the
administrative controls STPNOC has in place at the STP ISFSI sufficiently minimize the
possibility of a tip-over or handling event, and that the containment boundary would be
maintained in such an event. The staff confirmed that these administrative controls
comply with the technical specifications and UFSAR for the HI-STORM FW MPC
7 Storage System CoC No. 1032, Amendment 2, that is used at the STP site. In addition,
the staff confirmed that the information provided by STPNOC regarding STPs 72.212
Evaluation Report, Revision 3, demonstrates that the consequences of normal and
accident conditions would be within the regulatory limits of the 10 CFR 72.104 and 10
CFR 72.106. The staff also determined that the requested exemption is not related to
any aspect of the physical security or defense of the STP ISFSI; therefore, granting the
exemption would not result in any potential impacts to common defense and security.
For these reasons, the NRC staff has determined that under the requested
exemption, the storage system will continue to meet the safety requirements of 10 CFR
part 72 and the offsite dose limits of 10 CFR part 20 and, therefore, will not endanger life
or property or the common defense and security.
C. The Exemption is Otherwise in the Public Interest
The proposed exemption would allow STPNOC to shuffle (relocate) 10 already
loaded MPC CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System on the ISFSI pad at
the STP ISFSI in January 2025, and load two MPC CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC
Storage System in March 2025 at the STP ISFSI, even though the CBS variant basket
design is not part of the approved CoC No. 1032, Amendment No. 2. According to
STPNOC, the exemption is in the public interest because being able to load the two
MPC CBS will ensure adequate full core offload margin that is necessary for
completing refueling outages, implementing enterprise projects, and sustaining safe and
efficient operation of the nuclear facilities. STPNOC stated that the full core offload
margin was adversely impacted when STP could not load the two MPC-37-CBS
canisters in its 2022 campaign. Further delay in the loading campaign would further
impact the full core offload margin, and STPNOC would lose its ability to refuel the
operating reactor. In addition, each fuel bundle contributes to the decay heat removal
8 demand on the spent fuel pool cooling system, and removing the spent fuel bundles
from the pool would allow for dispersion of the remaining heat load and reduce the
consequence of a design basis accident associated with a loss of spent fuel pool cooling
event. A crowded pool would also increase the likelihood of a fuel handling accident
based on the additional fuel moves required to manage spent fuel pool loading with extra
assemblies in the pool. STPNOC further stated that the shuffling (relocating) of the 10
already loaded MPC CBS is necessary to optimize available space on the STP ISFSI
pad for cask transporter maneuverability and minimize long-term damage to the STP
ISFSI pad from cask transporter use, and thus ensures long-term safe storage of fuel-
loaded spent fuel storage canisters. The shuffling also provides additional shielding to
plant structures (such as warehouses and fabrication shops which are to the south of the
STP ISFSI pad) by moving the spent fuel storage canisters with higher calculated dose
rates (i.e., those loaded in MPC-37-CBS) further north from the plant structures and also
by placing the canisters with lower dose rate between the plant structures and MPC CBS canisters.
STPNOC has considered procuring empty MPC-37 canisters from other utilities;
however, STPs fuel assemblies are longer than fuel assemblies of other utilities that
load the MPC-37 model. Therefore, procuring MPC-37 canisters from other utilities is not
an option.
STPNOC has also considered procuring new MPC-37 canisters from the vendor
and confirmed the approximate delivery would be in April 2025, which is after the
planned March 2025 loading campaign. The loading campaigns are scheduled,
budgeted, and planned several years in advance based on planned refueling outages,
new fuel receipts, and other enterprise-level projects while considering the availability of
specialty resources (equipment, vendors) to complete a campaign. Any delay to the
9 March 2025 loading campaign would have cascading impacts to future new fuel receipts,
refueling outages, and other enterprise projects. STPNOC asserted that delaying loading
the two canisters beyond 2025 would result in loading these two canisters during the
next scheduled loading campaign in 2028. Then, the number of canisters to be loaded
would increase even more based on the new criticality analysis for the spent fuel pools
to accommodate the planned storage of accident tolerant fuel.
For the reasons described by STPNOC in the exemption request, as
supplemented, the NRC agrees that it is in the public interest to grant the exemption. If
the exemption is not granted, in order to comply with the CoC, STPNOC would have to
keep the loaded MPC-37-CBS at the current location on the STP ISFSI pad, and would
have to keep spent fuel in the spent fuel pool since it is not permitted to be loaded into
MPC CBS. This would impact STPNOCs ability to manage the full core offload
margin in STPs spent fuel pool, resulting in undesirable cascading impacts to new fuel
receipts, refueling outages, other enterprise projects, and potentially safe reactor
operation. Denying the exemption request could also challenge the cask transporter
maneuverability on the STP ISFSI pad, and thus increase the use of a cask transporter
on the STP ISFSI pad, which could increase the long-term damage to the STP ISFSI
pad and result in likely longer personnel radiation exposure from increased cask
transporter use.
Therefore, the staff concludes that approving the exemption is in the public
interest.
Environmental Consideration
The NRC staff also considered whether there would be any significant
environmental impacts associated with the exemption. For this proposed action, the
NRC staff performed an environmental assessment pursuant to 10 CFR 51.30. The
10 environmental assessment concluded that the proposed action would not significantly
impact the quality of the human environment. The NRC staff concluded that the
proposed action would not result in any changes in the types or amounts of any
radiological or non-radiological effluents that may be released offsite, and there would be
no significant increase in occupational or public radiation exposure because of the
proposed action. The environmental assessment and the finding of no significant impact
was published on June 26, 2024 (89 FR 53452).
IV.Conclusion
Based on these considerations, the NRC has determined that, pursuant to
10 CFR 72.7, the exemption is authorized by law, will not endanger life or property or the
common defense and security, and is otherwise in the public interest. Therefore, the
NRC grants STPNOC an exemption from the requirements of §§ 72.212(a)(2),
72.212(b)(3), 72.212(b)(5)(i), 72.212(b)(11), and 72.214 with respect to the shuffling of
10 MPC-37-CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System in January 2025 and the
future loading in the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System of two MPC-37-CBS in March
2025.
This exemption is effective upon issuance.
Dated: June 26, 2024.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
/RA/
Christian Jacobs, Acting Chief, Storage and Transportation Licensing Branch, Division of Fuel Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety, and Safeguards.
11