ML20127B704

Responds to 831110 Technical Assistance Request Re Physical Security Plan Review.Plan Meets Requirements of 10CFR73.67(f) & (G).Regulatory Analysis & Proposed License Condition Encl

ML20127B704
Person / Time
Site:	Reed College
Issue date:	05/09/1984
From:	Brown W NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To:	Thomas C Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20126J979	List: ML20126J977 ML20127B704
References
FOIA-92-35 NUDOCS 8406070120
Download: ML20127B704 (1)

Text

. - _ _ _ - _

4x WR %93 W./. 0 l & , [ . "W d * % '; . d').

01ST RIBUT lt,N:

SGff r/f 4 s/f l$crnard CRONO Suaret, w/o enc. I SGFF:CJR k g', 43g Rossomondo NHSS r/f Welu , w/o enr. 1 50-288 RRR R-112 Hillman Region V PAnd50" HEMORANDUM FOR: Cect) 0. Thomas Standardization and Special Projects Branch Olvision of Licensing. NRR FROM: Willard B. Brown. Chief Fuel Fact 11ty Safeguards Licensing Branch Division of Safeguards. N4SS

SUBJECT:

SECURITY PLAN REVIEW - REED COLLEGE In response to your Technical Assistance Request on the above subjtet we have completed our review of the " Physical Security Plan for Reed College Reactor Facility." submitted by letter dated November 10, 1903. Based on our evaluation, we have determined that the plan meets the requirements of 11 CFR 73.67(f) and (9) for the protection of Special Nuclear Material of low Strategic Significance. A Reculatory Malysis for the 'ecurity Plan is enclosed (En-closure 1).

Accordingly, we request that License No. R-112 be einended as set forth in Enclosure 2. Please inform the licensee that all previously sutaitted security We further request ccw:nttments that you provide are superseded this branch by(the cocattinents of this plan.SGFF) with a copy of your tran licensee on this matter.

It has been detemined that Enclosure 1 contains information of a type specified in10CFR2.790(d). Accordingly, pursuant to Section 2.790(d)(1), such informa-tion is deemed to be comercial or financial inforr.ation within the meaning of 10 CFR 9.5(a)(4) and shall be subject to disclosure only in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 9.12.

-' S Sfd h 3 6 Willard B. Brown, Chief Fuel Facility Safeguards Licensing Branch Division of Safeggards, NNSS Oko%p (f '

ss

/

/

cc: Jane Gibson 05000288010J Closed yg one.ce> SGFF SM S S k) ~}

. ,. ...> MgfHir t "- 't n Y. ~i'~~ j

' " > . 5/,f/,8.4.,,, ,,5/,7 L .5/b/.8,4.,, . 5/. 6/.8.4.

I

• v$= 5"> "A w c vonu vs.io no.y.cu ono OFFICIAL RECORD COPY L_

./

,: .v. .

Docket No. 50-288 g

Reed College

-3203 S. E. k'oodstock Street Portland, Oregon 97202 .

Attrntion: Dr. Michael Kay '

.f. Reactor Director Gettlemen:

This letter refers to an unannounced, routine, safeguards inspection of your activities authorized by NRC License No. R-ll2 conducted by Mr. L. R.  !

Norderhaug of this of fice on May 22 and 23,1985. It also refers to the discussions of our preliminary inspection findings held by the inspector with Dr. Marshall Cronyn and other members of the Reed College organization on tlay i 23, 1985 and a subsequent conversation with you on June 5, 1985. r Areas examined during this inspection included activities related to physical protection as described in the enclosed inspection report. k'ithin these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and records, interviews with facility and other personnel, and observations by the inspector.

k'ithin the scope of this inspection, no items of noncompliance were observed.

In accordance with Section 2.790(d) of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2  !

Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, documentation of the findings of your safeguards and security measures are exempt from public disclosure; therefore. '

the enclosures to this letter vill not be placed in the Public Document Room and will receive limited distributi E Should you have any questions concerning this letter, ve would be pleased to  !

discuss them with you, f

Sincerely, h *'. (,h d

• James Lf Montgomery, thief Nuclear-Material Safety and Safeguards Branch

Enclosure:

Inspection Report No. 50-288/85-02 (IE-V-693) cc w/ enclosure:

Dr. M. Cronyn, Reed College bec L.p/o enclosure: pink / green; LTMB; State of Oregon bec w/ enclosure: docket file; 'fr. Martin; RSB/ Document Cont rol Desk (RIDd)

RV n M h Norded'thaug/ dot Schuster Hory.gome ry j

6//i /85 6/sC/85 6//0/85 I

"I

p.wm -

t 49 . Ess rs.=,, p ene=. ...e=... rm ,

Y' 'DCT 061W W h'./

p -

j Q:

,.y . .l

.~

Docket No. 50 288

{o. q T

Reed College i p k 4 Portland, Oregon 97202 k, - Attention: Dr. Paul Bragdon F. President b

(- Gentlemen:  :

?

I This letter refers to the routine safeguards icspection of your activities- -

~;

authorized under N3C Liccust No. R-112 conducted bj Hr. A. V.-Vieder of_this; i, office oa August 25,- 26 and Se:ptember 4,1986. .It also refers to:the:

discussion of his it.spection findings with you, Vice President McFarland and-

-Dr. Pay on August 26,f1986.

The inspection included examination of activities related to safeguarding.

3 1

special nuclear-material-as-described in the enclosed: inspection report.- +

Within these areas, the_ inspection consisted of selective examinations'of.

procedures and records,-interviews.with facility.. staff and inspector-j_ observations.

. Based on the resultsf oi this-inspection, tit appears that one-of your' i

' activities.vas not conducted a full _ compliance with NRC requirements 'as set -  :

forth in the Notice of Violation enclosed as Appendix A to this_ letter. The' '

r iten has been categorized into a severity level-as_ described _in the NRCi j Enforcement Policy, 10 CFR Part 2,-Appendix C.

i.-

e Your response to this Notice-is to be submitted in accordance with the- '

o. .

provisions of 10 CFR 2.2017as stated in Appendit:A,: Notice-_of_ Violation,-

t In accordance with Section'2.790(d)lof NRC's " Riles:of Practice " Part;2,

~

Title:

10 Code of Federal. Regulations,7 documentation;of the findingsLof_your L

safeguards .and security procedures are exempt:from public disclosure;E __

th(refore,Lthe enclosed inspection report, the enclosed Notice of Violation- ,"

L y

~._and your response thereto will-not'be placed in'the Public Document: Room and: '

will receive limited' distribution ~.. -

n -

L  : The responsa directed .by this letter _and-the enclosed Notice are:not'subjecto

-to the clearance procedures of-the? Office of. Management and Budget asirequired L by the Paperwork Reduction Act of:.1980, PL 96-511.

l gNlll -

.. _ . . . y =. .y m. = . =

.e f& .

,pp n_

y6tg4,;6,E%M..M..Wmi c ., m 5i ll 0514%

fy.). . ,

YU[hDihhD

p. ~.

2

.W'

,e . .. ,

$fN Th Should you have any questions concerning this letter, we would be pleased to discuss the matter with you.

%?

y.

Sincere 1y, 0'

h)4 *

• /

W,i Jameg7L. Montg ery, Chief N' Nuclear Materials Safety and i Safeguards Branch e Enclosures

1. Appendix A, Notice of Violation

!, 2.

y Inspection Report Nos. 50-288/86-02 and 50-288/86-03 (IE-V-768) _

, cc w/ enclosures; f M. Pollack, Acting Reactor Director ec w/o enclosures:

i R&f D. Paris, Dept. of Human Resources, Portland bec v/ enclosures:

RSB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)

B. Faulkenberry J. Martin bec w/o enclosures:

G. Cook IJHB Regi n V g _

AWibd~e r/ norma DSchuster AJo ison JMo tgomery 10/ %/86 10/9-/86 10/ '/86 10/$/86 e ts % e.t 4 44 % b 4 g erner rins f7 ,

A_ 7. ,=u- ,--,- g e-x ey.----

W . ~ . , . . . . .., ~ .. ~ . _.. ... .u .,..._..-

3 .

EUGENEPEACEWORKS

'1 454 WILLAMETTE ST.

EUGENE, OR. 97401-

' JANUARY 16,1992

'/L gap 343 8548 1RgtDOM 0F lNFORMATION =

LBEEDOMOFINFORMAT1CNACTREQUEST ACT REQUEST:

' To: Office Of Chairperson p.z:4 - 7 / -> S Nuclear Regulatory Commission

& V /-d J-? E 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20052 Re: FOIA Roquest concerning experimental Nuclear Facility at Reed College Portland, Oregon.

Dear NRC,

I am a volunteer member of Eugene PeaceWorks a non-profit-public organization

• whose members are interested and concemed about the spread of Nuclear technology .

and waste in our state. We are currently organizing a public forum-In Eugene and will continue to organize other public forums on the state of the Nuclear industry in Oregon. One of our members found an-interesting recent (December 1991) article in our' local paper, the Register. Guard,. about a Nuclear. accident at an Experimental' <

Nuclear Facility at Reed College,' Portland, Oregon. Could you send copies _of any and all documents you have regarding this facility within 10 (ten) days. Would you_ also send a description (including _ map with location if available)? We will share this information with the public and make ourselves available for interviews with local news agencies concerning this issue of critical importance to all Oregonians.

We will also donate this material to our local public library.

Sincerely, Ida .

Richard Gold M

-