05000237/FIN-2012002-08: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| identified by = NRC | | identified by = NRC | ||
| Inspection procedure = IP 71153 | | Inspection procedure = IP 71153 | ||
| Inspector = J Beavers, J Cameron, M Jones, N Valos, R Langstaff, T Briley, T Go, Z Falevits, A Dunlop, C Phillips, D Melendez, | | Inspector = J Beavers, J Cameron, M Jones, N Valos, R Langstaff, T Briley, T Go, Z Falevits, A Dunlop, C Phillips, D Melendez Colon, E Sanchez Santiago | ||
| CCA = P.2 | | CCA = P.2 | ||
| INPO aspect = PI.2 | | INPO aspect = PI.2 | ||
| description = The inspectors identified a Severity Level IV NCV and associated finding of very low safety significance of 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Immediate Notification Requirements for Operating Nuclear Power Reactors, for the failure to report an event to the NRC within 8 hours, where an event or condition that at the time of discovery could have prevented the fulfillment of the safety function of structures or systems that are needed to mitigate the consequences of an accident. The licensee had not prepared any corrective actions by the end of the inspection period. The inspectors determined that a failure to report was an example of a violation that could impact the regulatory process and was subject to Traditional Enforcement. The inspectors determined that the underlying technical issue involved the inability to scram The inspectors determined that a failure to report was an example of a violation that could impact the regulatory process and was subject to Traditional Enforcement. The inspectors determined that the underlying technical issue involved the inability to scram | | description = The inspectors identified a Severity Level IV NCV and associated finding of very low safety significance of 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Immediate Notification Requirements for Operating Nuclear Power Reactors, for the failure to report an event to the NRC within 8 hours, where an event or condition that at the time of discovery could have prevented the fulfillment of the safety function of structures or systems that are needed to mitigate the consequences of an accident. The licensee had not prepared any corrective actions by the end of the inspection period. The inspectors determined that a failure to report was an example of a violation that could impact the regulatory process and was subject to Traditional Enforcement. The inspectors determined that the underlying technical issue involved the inability to scram The inspectors determined that a failure to report was an example of a violation that could impact the regulatory process and was subject to Traditional Enforcement. The inspectors determined that the underlying technical issue involved the inability to scram | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:45, 20 February 2018
| Site: | Dresden  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000237/2012002 Section 4OA3 |
| Date counted | Mar 31, 2012 (2012Q1) |
| Type: | TEV: Severity level IV |
| cornerstone | Miscellaneous |
| Identified by: | NRC identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71153 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | J Beavers J Cameron M Jones N Valos R Langstaff T Briley T Go Z Falevits A Dunlop C Phillips D Melendez Colon E Sanchez Santiago |
| CCA | P.2, Evaluation |
| INPO aspect | PI.2 |
| ' | |