ML003682144

(Duplicate of ML003677639) Regulatory Guide 1.180, Guidelines for Evaluating Electromagnetic and Radio-Frequency Interference in Safety-Related Instrumentation and Control Systems.

ML003682144
Person / Time
Issue date:	01/31/2000
From:	Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
To:
References
DG-1029 Regulatory Guide 1.180
Download: ML003682144 (32)

Text

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION January 2000 0; REGULATORY GUIDE "OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH REGULATORY GUIDE 1.180 (Draft was issued as DG-1029)

GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING ELECTROMAGNETIC AND RADIO-FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE IN SAFETY-RELATED INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL SYSTEMS A. INTRODUCTION The NRC's regulations in Part 50, "Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities," of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR Part

50) state that structures, systems, and components important to safety in a nuclear power plant be designed to accommodate the effects of environmental conditions (i.e., remain functional under all postulated service conditions) and that design control measures such as testing be used to check the adequacy of design. Section 50.55a(h) of 10 CFR Part 50 states that protection systems must meet the requirements of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) standard (Std) 603 1991, "Criteria for Safety Systems for Nuclear Power Generating Stations,"'

or IEEE Std 279-1971, "Criteria for Protection Systems for Nuclear Power Generating Stations,"'

contingent on the date of construction permit issuance. The design basis criteria identified in those standards, or by similar provisions in the licensing basis for such facilities, include the range of transient and steady state environmental conditions during normal, abnormal, and accident circumstances throughout which the equipment must perform. Criterion III, "Design Control," Criterion XI, "Test Control," and Criterion XVII, "Quality Assurance Records," of Appendix B, "Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants," to 10 CFR Part 50 establish practices to

'IEEE publications may be purchased from the IEEE Service Center, 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08855 1331.

Regulatory guides are issued to describe and make available to the public such information as methods acceptable to the NRC staff for implementing of the NRC's regulations, techniques used by the staff in evaluating specific parts specific problems or postulated accidents, and data needed by the of applications for permits and licenses. Regulatory guides are not NRC staff in its review substitutes for regulations, and compliance with them is not required.

different from those set out in the guides will be acceptable if they Methods and solutions provide a basis for the findings requisite to the issuance or continuance of a permit or license by the Commission.

This guide was Issued after consideration of comments received from the public. Comments and suggestions for improvements in these at all times, and guides will be revised, as appropriate, to accommodate guides are encouraged comments and to reflect new information or experience. Written submitted to the Rules and Directives Branch, ADM, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory comments may be Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

Regulatory guides are issued in ten broad divisions: 1, Power Reactors; 2, Research and Test Reactors; 3. Fuels and Materials Facilities; 4, Siting; 5. Materials and Plant Protection; 6, Products; 7, Transportation; Environmental and 8, Occupational Health; 9, Antitrust and Financial Review; and 10, General.

Single coples of regulatory guides lwhich may be reproduced) may be obtained free of charge by writing the Distribution Services Section, Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by fax to 1301)415-2289, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory or by email to DISTRIBUTION@NRC.GOV. Many regulatory guides the internet at NRC's home page at <WWW.NRC.GOV>. are also available on r Q-1

10 CFR 50.49 and confirm that a design fulfills its technical requirements. Furthermore, check the adequacy used to 50.55a address validation measures such as testing that can be contained in General Design Criteria 1, 2, 4, 13, 21, 22, of design, Related requirements are Plants," to 10 CFR Part and 23 of Appendix A, "General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power 52, "Early,

50. Additionally, Subpart B, "Standard Design Certifications," of 10 CFR Part Site Permits; Standard Design Certifications; and Combined Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants," addresses verification requirements for advanced reactor designs. state Specifically, 10 for design certification must the tests,,

CFR 52.47(a)(vi), requires that an application inspections, analyses, and acceptance criteria that are necessary and sufficient Methods to provide certification. for reasonable assurance that a plant will operate within the design the 10 2 information under addressing electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) constitute Tier 2

CFR Part 52 requirements.

(RFI), and power Electromagnetic interference (EMI), radio-frequency interference affect the performance of surges have been identified as environmental conditions that can research findings to support, electrical equipment that is important to safety. Confirmatory of Reactor this observation can be found in NUREG/CR-5700, "Aging Assessment NUREG/CR-5904, Instrumentation and Protection System Components"S (July 1992),

of Digital Protection Systems of "Functional Issues and Environmental Qualification NUREG/CR-6406, "Environmental Advanced Light-Water Nuclear Reactors"', (April 1994),

1996), and NUREG/CR Testing of an Experimental Digital Safety.Channelr" (September of Environmental 6579, "Digital I&C Systems in Nuclear Power Plants: Risk-Screening Unavailability With an Existing Analog System7' Stressors and a Comparison of Hardware and the susceptibility of (January 1998). Therefore, controlling electrical noise is an important instrumentation and control (I&C) systems to EMI/RFI and power surges step in meeting the aforementioned requirements.

This regulatory guide endorses design, installation, and testing practices acceptable on safety-related.

to the NRC staff for addressing the effects of EMI/RFI and power surges practices I&C systems in a nuclear power plant environment. The design and installation Equipment Control described in IEEE Std 1050-1996, "IEEE Guide for Instrumentation and EMI/RFI subject to the Grounding in Generating Stations,"' are endorsed for limiting (EMC) testing conditions stated in the Regulatory Position. Electromagnetic compatibility electromagnetic practices from military and commercial standards are endorsed to address (SWC). Selected emissions, EMI/RFI immunity, and power surge withstand capability Emission EMI/RFI test criteria from Military Standard (MIL-STD) 461, "Electromagnetic from the Tier 2 2An applicant that references an advanced reactor certification is not allowed to depart such as that in 10 CFR process commitments without NRC approval. Thus, changes cannot be made under a 50.59.

3Copies are available at current rates from the U.S. Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 37082, Washington, or from the National Technical Information Service by writing DC 20402-9328 (telephone (202)512-2249); inspection or copying for a fee NTIS at 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161. Copies are available forthe PDR's mailing address is Mail from the NRC Public Document Room at 2120 L Street NW., Washington, DC; Stop LL-6, Washington, DC 20555; telephone (202)634-3273; fax (202)634-3343.

1.180-2

and Susceptibility Requirements for the Control of Electromagnetic Interference," 4 are endorsed to evaluate conducted and radiated EMI/RFI phenomena for safety-related I&C systems. This regulatory guide provides two acceptable suites of EMI/RFI emissions and susceptibility criteria from the two most recent versions of the MIL-STD. Either of these suites of test criteria can be applied as an alternative complete set (i.e., either one should be used in its entirety). The regulatory guide also endorses associated test methods from MIL STD 462, 'Measurement of Electromagnetic Interference Characteristics,"'4 that correspond to the MIL-STD 461 test criteria. In addition, electromagnetic operating envelopes corresponding to the MIL-STD 461 test criteria are endorsed for use in establishing test levels when applying the MIL-STD 462 test methods. These operating envelopes were tailored to represent the characteristic electromagnetic environment in key locations at nuclear power plants. They are presented within the Regulatory Position along with the description of the endorsed MIL-STD 462 test methods.

The SWC practices described in IEEE Std C62.41-1991 (Reaffirmed Recommended Practice on Surge Voltages in Low-Voltage in 1995), "IEEE AC Power Circuits,"1 and IEEE Std C62.45-1992, "IEEE Guide on Surge Testing for Equipment Connected to Low-Voltage AC Power Circuits,"' are acceptable to the NRC staff regarding the effect of power surges on safety-related I&C systems in nuclear power plants. A specific set of surge test waveforms are endorsed from IEEE Std C62.41-1991 as the acceptable SWC test criteria. The associated test methods in IEEE Std C62.45-1992 are endorsed to describe the approach to be employed when assessing SWC. General withstand levels are endorsed for use with the SWC test criteria and are presented within the Regulatory Position along with the description of the endorsed surge waveforms.

The practices endorsed in this regulatory guide apply to both safety-related I&C systems and non-safety-related I&C systems whose failures can affect safety functions.

Rationale for the selection of the practices depicted in this guide is that they provide a well established, systematic approach for ensuring EMC and the capability to withstand power surges in I&C equipment within the environment in which it operates. The technical basis for selecting these particular practices is given in NUREG/CR-5941, "Technical Basis for Evaluating Electromagnetic and Radio-Frequency Interference in Safety-Related I&C Systems"'3 (April 1994), and NUREG/CR-6431, "Recommended Electromagnetic Operating Envelopes for Safety-Related I&C Systems in Nuclear Power Plants"3 (April 1999).

In general, information provided by regulatory guides is reflected in the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800, "Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants").' NRC's Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation uses the Standard Review Plan to review applications to construct and operate nuclear power plants.

This regulatory guide will apply to the revised Chapter 7, "Instrumentation and Controls," of the Standard Review Plan.

The information collections contained in this regulatory guide are covered by the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, which were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, approval number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is 4

Military Standards are available from the Department of Defense, Standardization Documents Order Desk, Building 4D, 700 Robbins Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094.

1.180-3

not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

B. DISCUSSION Existing I&C equipment in nuclear power plants is currently being replaced with However, these computer-based digital I&C systems or advanced analog systems.

technologies may exhibit greater vulnerability to the nuclear power plant EMI/RFI an acceptable environment than existing I&C systems. This regulatory guide provides projected electromagnetic method for qualifying digital or advanced analog systems for the environment in nuclear power plants.

sources of electrical The typical environment in a nuclear power plant includes many of large inductive loads, noise, for example, hand-held two-way radios, arc welders, switching with switching at the high fault currents, and high-energy fast transients associated analog- and generator or transmission voltage levels. The increasing use of advanced safety-related plant microprocessor-based I&C systems in reactor protection and other additional noise sources and systems has introduced concerns with respect to the creation of in the nuclear the susceptibility of this equipment to the electrical noise already present power plant environment.

systems are Digital technology is constantly evolving, and manufacturers of digital voltages into their incorporating increasingly higher clock frequencies and lower logic level an adverse impact on the designs. However, these performance advancements may have because of the operation of digital systems with respect to EMIIRFI and power surges logic signals.

increased likelihood of extraneous noise being misinterpreted as legitimate being performed With recent advances in analog electronics, many of the functions presently board single analog circuit by several analog circuit boards could be combined into a more susceptible to operating at reduced voltage levels, thereby making analog circuitry issues related to EMIIRFI and power surges as well. Hence, operational and functional of upsets and safety in the nuclear power plant environment must address the possibility malfunctions in I&C systems caused by EMI/RFI and power surges.

report The NRC staff accepted the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) topical 5 in a in Power Plants,"

TR-102323, "Guidelines for Electromagnetic Interference Testing method of addressing Safety Evaluation Report (SER) by letter dated April 17, 1996,6 as one plants. This issues of EMC for safety-related digital I&C systems in nuclear power the SER by improving the technical regulatory guide complements the position set forth in and the SER basis for evaluating EMI/RFI and power surges. This regulatory guide approach and are endorsing EPRI's guidance in TR-102323 adhere to the same overall based on IEEE Std generally in agreement. Each recommends EMI/RFI-limiting practices Coggins Drive, P.O. Box 232058 5

EPRI publications may be purchased from the EPRI Distribution Center, 207 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523, telephone (510) 934-4212.

Room at 2120 L Street

ýCopies are available for inspection or copying for a fee from the NRC Public Document DC 20555; telephone NW., Washington, DC; the PDR's mailing address is Mail Stop LL-6, Washington, (202)834-3273; fax (202)634-3343.

1.180-4

1050,' which endorses emissions and susceptibility test criteria and test methods to evaluate safety-related I&C systems, and identifies appropriate operating envelopes for equipment and systems intended for selected locations in nuclear power plants without requiring additional plant-specific electromagnetic measurements. Each document presents acceptable means for demonstrating EMC and they are consistent in their respective approaches.

The licensee or applicant has the freedom to choose the method best suited to the situation.

The SER accepted the EMI/RFI engineering practices in IEEE Std 1050-19891 and accepted selected test methods in Military Standard (MIL-STD) 462,' IEEE Std C62.45,'

and International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 801, "Electromagnetic Compatibility for Industrial-Process Measurement and Control Equipment,"7 as appropriate means for assessing the electromagnetic compatibility of safety-related I&C system designs.

This regulatory guide endorses the military and IEEE standards as appropriate means for assessing the electromagnetic compatibility of safety-related I&C system designs.

The IEC 801 series standard is not used in this regulatory guide since it contains parts that remain in draft form and it was recently superseded by IEC 61000-4, "Electromagnetic Compatibility, Part 4: Testing and Measurement Techniques,"7 which has not been reviewed by NRC staff.

The most significant difference between the testing approaches is found in the applicability of transient test criteria. The MIL-STD and IEEE test methods are not generally used for assessing conducted susceptibility across interconnecting signal lines, whereas IEC 801 does contain such provisions. Therefore, because of the focus on the MIL-STD and IEEE test criteria, this guidance does not explicitly address signal line conducted susceptibility.

Since it is conceivable that signal line transients could disrupt the performance of safety-related I&C systems, the SER position represents current guidance for addressing this issue.

Some areas of the Regulatory Position in this guide offer options to the guidance discussed in the SER. First, Regulatory Position 2 endorses IEEE Std 1050, as updated in 1996. IEEE 1050 outlines the engineering practices needed to control EMI/RFI-and surge related upsets and malfunctions in safety-related I&C systems. Second, Regulatory Position 3 specifies only complete suites of EMI/RFI emissions and susceptibility criteria from the two most prominent military standards (i.e., no mixing and matching of test criteria and methods are recommended). Third, the electromagnetic operating envelopes that form the basis for establishing EMI/RFI testing levels are framed in suitable measurement units and frequency ranges for each specific test method. Fourth, the Regulatory Position guidance applies to analog, digital, and hybrid (i.e., combined analog and digital electronics) safety-related I&C systems since the nuclear power plant of the future may utilize all of them.

The EMI/RFI practices, SWC practices, and operating envelopes endorsed in this guide are only elements of the total package that is needed to ensure EMC within nuclear power plants. In addition to assessing the electromagnetic environment, plants should apply sound engineering practices for nonsafety-related upgrades and I&C maintenance as part of an overall EMC program. While nonsafety-related systems are not part of the regulatory guidance being developed, control of EMI/RFI from these systems is necessary to ensure that safety-related I&C systems can continue to perform properly in the nuclear power plant 7International Electrotechnical Commission documents are available from the IEC at 3 rue de Varembe, PO Box 131, 1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland.

1.180-5

held to environment. When feasible, the emissions from nonsafety-related systems should be the same levels as safety-related systems.

in This regulatory guide endorses IEEE Std 1050-19961 with one exception as stated 1050-1989 and Regulatory Position 2. IEEE Std 1050-1996 is a revision of IEEE Std content of that standard. The addresses three of the four exceptions taken to 8the technical guidance on the provides four exceptions were cited in NUREG/CR-5941. IEEE Std 1050 I&C engineering practices needed to control upsets and malfunctions in safety-related was developed to systems when exposed to EMI/RFI and power surges. IEEE Std 1050 systems for I&C equipment provide guidance on the design and installation of grounding are to achieve both a specific to power generating stations. Further purposes of the standard electrical noise suitable level of protection for personnel and equipment and suitable immunity for signal ground references in power generating stations.

for I&C IEEE Std 1050 addresses grounding and noise-minimization techniques practices for the systems in a generating station environment. This standard recommends and shielding of treatment of both analog and digital systems that address the grounding susceptibility to EMI/RFI electronic circuits on the basis of minimizing emissions and their the theoretical and and power surges. The standard is comprehensive in that it covers both practical aspects of grounding and electromagnetic compatibility.

are Design verification measures for EMIIRFI testing (emissions and susceptibility)

I&C beyond the scope of IEEE Std 1050. To determine the adequacy of safety-related criteria in MIL-STD system designs, the NRC staff has endorsed the applicable EMI/RFI test Regulatory 461' and the associated test methods in MIL-STD 462." These are cited in MIL-STD 461C4 and 461D4 Positions 3, 4, and 5 and include EMI/RFI test criteria from both 461 and 462 as well as the associated MIL-STD 4624 and 462D4 test methods. MIL-STD equipment. The were developed as measures to ensure the electromagnetic compatibility of is tailored for the intended application of the MIL-STD test criteria and test methods which tests are applied function of the equipment and the characteristic environment (i.e.,

location of and what levels are used depend on the function to be performed and the of Defense operation). These standards have been used successfully by the U.S. Department for many years and are commonly referenced in commercial applications.

the Design verification measures for power surge withstand testing are also beyond scope of IEEE Std 1050-1996. Accordingly, the NRC has endorsed the test criteria the associated test methods recommended in recommended in IEEE Std C62.41-19911 and guidance IEEE Std C62.45-19921 in Regulatory Position 6. IEEE Std C62.41-1991 provides SWC of for the selection of voltage and current surge test criteria for evaluating the of the SWC test criteria is equipment connected to low-voltage ac power circuits. Selection available energy based on location within the facility, power line impedance to the surge, and manageable content. The standard also defines a set of surge test waveforms that has IEEE Std C62.45-1992 provides dimensions and represents a baseline surge environment.

the surge guidance on the test methods and equipment to be employed when performing tests.

and power General operating envelopes that form the basis for establishing EMI/RFI the surge testing levels are cited in this regulatory guide. The technical basis for 1.180-6

electromagnetic operating envelopes is presented in NUREG/CR-6431. 3 The operating envelopes are applicable for locations within a nuclear power plant where safety-related I&C systems either are or are likely to be installed. These locations include control rooms, remote shutdown panels, cable spreading rooms, equipment rooms, relay rooms, auxiliary instrument rooms, and other areas (e.g., the turbine deck) where safety-related I&C system installations are planned. The operating envelopes are also applicable for both analog and digital system installations.

Any modifications to the electromagnetic operating envelopes (e.g., lower site-specific envelopes) should be based on technical evidence comparable to that presented in NUREG/CR-6431. Relaxation in the operating envelopes should be based on actual measurement data collected in accordance with IEEE Std 473-1985 (Reaffirmed in 1991),

"IEEE Recommended Practice for an Electromagnetic Site Survey (10 kHz to 10 GHz)."I C. REGULATORY POSITION

1. General Establishing and continuing an electromagnetic compatibility program for safety related I&C systems in nuclear power plants contributes to the assurance that structures, systems, and components important to safety are designed to accommodate the effects of and to be compatible with the environmental conditions associated with nuclear power plant service conditions. Application of consensus standard practices regarding the design, testing, and installation of safety-related I&C system modifications or new installations constitutes an important element of such a program. This guidance recommends design and installation practices to limit the impact of electromagnetic effects, testing criteria to assess the emissions and susceptibility of equipment, and testing criteria to evaluate the power SWC of the equipment. Operating envelopes characteristic of the electromagnetic environment in nuclear power plants are cited in this guidance as the basis for establishing acceptable testing levels. Table 1 lists the specific regulatory positions on EMC that are set forth below.

This guidance is applicable for all new safety-related systems or modifications to existing safety-related systems that include analog, digital, or hybrid (i.e., combined analog and digital electronics) equipment. The endorsed test methods for evaluating the electromag netic emissions, EMI/RFI susceptibility, and power surge withstand capability of safety related equipment are intended for application in test facilities or laboratories prior to installation.

The electromagnetic conditions at the point of installation for safety-related I&C systems should be assessed to identify any unique EMI/RFI sources that may generate local interference. The EMI/RFI sources could include both portable and fixed equipment (e.g.,

portable transceivers, arc welders, power supplies, and generators). Steps should be taken during installation to ensure that the systems are not exposed to EMI/RFI levels from the identified sources that are greater than 8 dB below the specified operating envelopes.

To ensure that the operating envelopes are being used properly, equipment should be tested in the same physical configuration as that specified for its actual installation in the 1.180-7

Table I Specific Regulatory Positions for EMC Guidance Regulatory EMC Issue Standards Comments/Conditions

-Position Addressed ' Endorsed 2 EMI/RFI limiting IEEE Std 1050-1996 Full standard endorsed with practices one exception taken.

IEEE Std 518-1982 Endorsed as referenced by IEEE Std 665-1995 IEEE Std 1050-1996.

3, 4, 5 EMI/RFI emissions MIL-STD 461D Selected MIL-STD 461 test and immunity MIL-STD 462D criteria endorsed along with testing associated MIL-STD 462 test MIL-STD 461C methods.

MIL-STD 462 Option of alternative test suites from two most recent MIL-STD versions.

General electromagnetic operating envelopes for key nuclear power plant locations are included in Regulatory Positions 4 and 5.

6 Surge withstand IEEE Std C62.41 Selected IEEE Std C62.41 capability testing IEEE Std C62.45 surge test waveforms endorsed with associated IEEE Std C62.45 test methods.

General withstand levels for nuclear power plants are included in Regulatory Position 6.

plant. In addition, the physical configuration of the safety-related I&C system should be maintained and all changes in the configuration controlled. The design specifications that should be maintained and controlled include wire and cable separations, shielding techniques, shielded enclosure integrity, apertures, gasketing, grounding techniques, EMI/RFI filters, and circuit board layouts.

Exclusion zones should be established through administrative controls to prohibit the activation of portable EMI/RFI emitters (e.g., welders, transceivers, cameras, flash attachments) in areas where safety-related I&C systems have been installed. An exclusion zone is defined as the minimum distance permitted between the point of installation and 1.180-8

where portable EMI/RFI emitters are allowed to be activated. The size of the exclusion zones should be site-specific and depend on the effective radiated power and antenna gain of the portable EMI/RFI emitters used within a particular nuclear power plant. The size of exclusion zones should also depend on the allowable electric field emission levels designated for the area in the vicinity of the installed safety-related I&C system. To establish the size of an exclusion zone, an 8 dB difference between the susceptibility operating envelope and the allowed emissions level should be maintained. For the radiated electric field operating envelope of 10 V/m (140 dBpV/m), the size of the exclusion zones should be set such that the radiated electric fields emanating from the portable transceivers are limited to 4 V/m (132 dBpV/m) in the vicinity of safety-related I&C systems. The minimum distance of an exclusion zone (d) in meters should be calculated by:

d=(30PG)°.5/E where P = the effective radiated power of the EMI/RFI emitter (in watts);

G = the gain of the EMI/RFI emitter antenna (assume G=1 is worst case); and, E = the allowable radiated electric field strength of the EMI/RFI emitter (in V/m) at the point of installation.

2. IEEE Std 1050-1996 IEEE Std 1050-1996, "IEEE Guide for Instrumentation and Control Equipment Grounding in Generating Stations,"1 describes design and installation practices that are acceptable to the NRC staff regarding EMI/RFI- and power surge-related effects on safety related I&C systems employed in nuclear power plants with the following exception.

Section 4.3.7.4, "Radiative Coupling," of the standard maintains that the "field strength" of propagating electromagnetic waves is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source of radiation. This statement needs to be re-evaluated because radiative coupling is a far-field effect. A distance, r, greater than the wavelength divided by 27r (r>>1/2) from the source of radiation is considered to be far field, which is the region where the wave impedance is equal to the characteristic impedance of the medium. Both the electric and magnetic "field strengths" fall off as 1/r in the far field, i.e., in inverse proportion to distance (not as its square). This concept is not to be confused with the propagation of electromagnetic waves in the near field (r < /27r) where the wave impedance is determined by the characteristics of the source and the distance from the source. In the near field, if the source impedance is high (>3770), the electric and magnetic "field strengths" attenuate at rates of 1/rs and 1/r2 , respectively. If the source impedance is low (<3770), the rates of attenuation are reversed: the electric "field strength" will fall off at a rate of 1/r2 and the magnetic "field strength" at a rate of 1/r'. The user should understand that radiative coupling is a far-field effect and the "field strength" falls off as 1/r, not as 1/r2.

IEEE Std 1050-1996 references other standards that contain complementary and supplementary information. In particular, IEEE Std 518-1982 (Reaffirmed in 1990), "IEEE Guide for the Installation of Electrical Equipment to Minimize Noise Inputs to Controllers from External Sources," and IEEE Std 665-1995, "IEEE Guide for Generating Station Grounding,"' are referenced frequently. The portions of IEEE Std 518-1982 and IEEE Std 1.180-9

665-1995 referenced in IEEE Std 1050-1996 are endorsed by this guide and are to be used in a manner consistent with the practices in IEEE Std 1050-1996.

3. MIL-STD 461 MIL-STD 461, "Electromagnetic Emission and Susceptibility Requirements for the Control of Electromagnetic Interference,". contains test criteria that can be applied to address EMI/RFI effects for a selection of environments. The specific MIL-STD 461 test criteria acceptable to the NRC staff in regard to susceptibility and emissions testing for safety-related I&C systems in nuclear power plants are presented in Tables 2 and 3. Table 2 lists the EMI/RFI test criteria in MIL-STD 461D while Table 3 lists the corresponding MIL STD 461C counterparts. These criteria cover conducted and radiated interference (emissions and susceptibility), exposure to electric and magnetic fields, and noise coupling through power and control leads. The criteria do not cover conducted interference on interconnecting signal lines.

MIL-STD 461D provides the latest revision of the test criteria (including improvements based on experience and the most recent technical information), thus it represents current practice. However, guidance on the MIL-STD 461C test criteria, which are counterparts to the MIL-STD 461D test criteria, is also given. This option is provided to avoid placing an undue burden on the nuclear power industry by limiting the available test resources to those test laboratories with the MIL-STD 462D test capability. It is intended that either set be applied in its entirety, without selective application of individual criteria (i.e., no mixing and matching of test criteria).

Table 2 Recommended MIL-STD 461D Test Criteria Criterion Description CE101 Conducted emissions, power leads, 30 Hz to 10 kHz CE102 Conducted emissions, power leads, 10 kHz to 10 MHz CS101 Conducted susceptibility, power leads, 30 Hz to 50 kHz CS114 Conducted susceptibility, bulk cable injection, 10 kHz to 400 MHz RE101 Radiated emissions, magnetic field, 30 Hz to 100 kHz RE102 Radiated emissions, electric field, 10 kHz to 1 GHz RS101 Radiated susceptibility, magnetic field, 30 Hz to 100 kHz RS103 Radiated susceptibility, electric field, 10 kHz to 1 GHz C = conducted, E = emissions, R = radiated, and S = susceptibility.

1.180-10

Table 3 MIL-STD 461C Counterparts to Applicable MIL-STD 461D Test Criteria Criterion Description CE01 Conducted emissions, power leads, 30 Hz to 15 kHz CE03 Conducted emissions, power leads, 15 kHz to 50 MHz CS01 Conducted susceptibility, power leads, 30 Hz to 50 kHz CS02 Conducted susceptibility, power and interconnecting control leads, 50 kHz to 400 MHz RE01 Radiated emissions, magnetic field, 30 Hz to 50 kHz RE02 Radiated emissions, electric field, 14 kHz to 1 GHz RS01 Radiated susceptibility, magnetic field, 30 Hz to 50 kHz RS03 Radiated susceptibility, electric field, 14 kHz to 1 GHz C = conducted, E = emissions, R = radiated, and S = susceptibility.

The MIL-STD 461 test criteria listed in Tables 2 and 3 have associated operating envelopes that serve to establish test levels. General operating envelopes that are acceptable to the NRC staff are given below in the discussion of the MIL-STD 462 test methods that correspond to the listed EMI/RFI test criteria. These operating envelopes are acceptable for locations where safety-related I&C systems either are or are likely to be installed and include control rooms, remote shutdown panels, cable spreading rooms, equipment rooms, auxiliary instrument rooms, relay rooms, and other areas (e.g., the turbine deck) where safety-related I&C system installations are planned.

The operating envelopes are acceptable for analog, digital, and hybrid system installations.

The detailed technical basis for the electromagnetic operating envelopes is presented in NUREG/CR-6431.3 The technical basis for the operating envelopes begins with the MIL STD envelopes corresponding to the electromagnetic environment for military ground facilities, which were judged to be comparable to that of nuclear power plants based on general layout and equipment type considerations. Plant emissions data were used to confirm the adequacy of the operating envelopes. From the MIL-STD starting point, susceptibility envelopes were adjusted to account for the plant emissions data reported in NUREG/CR-6436, "Survey of Ambient Electromagnetic and Radio-Frequency Interference Levels in Nuclear Power Plants"3 (November 1996) and EPRI TR-102323. 5 The basis for adjustments to the equipment emissions envelopes included consideration of the primary intent of the MIL-STD envelopes (e.g., whether the envelopes were based on protecting sensitive receivers on military platforms) and maintaining some margin with the susceptibility envelopes. Finally, when changes to the operating envelopes from the MIL STD origin were motivated by technical considerations, consistency among the envelopes for comparable test criteria was promoted and commercial emissions limits for industrial environments were factored into adjustments of the envelopes. As a result of these 1.180-11

equivalent or considerations, the operating envelopes presented in this regulatory guide are less restrictive than the MIL-STD envelopes that served as their initial basis.

4. TEST METHODS, MIL-STD 462D The test methods that demonstrate compliance with the MIL-STD 461D EMI/RFI Interference test criteria are specified in MIL-STD 462D, "Measurement of Electromagnetic 4 The test methods from MIL-STD 462D that correspond to the endorsed Characteristics.'

are acceptable to EMI/RFI test criteria listed in Table 2 are discussed below. These methods intended for the NRC staff for accomplishing EMI/RFI testing for safety-related I&C systems installation in nuclear power plants.

below General operating envelopes that are acceptable to the NRC staff are also given are tailored in the discussion of the MIL-STD 462D test methods. The operating envelopes and serve to establish testing levels to the nuclear power plant electromagnetic environment These operating envelopes are for the assessment of EMI/RFI emissions and susceptibility.

likely to be acceptable for locations where safety-related I&C systems either are or are installed and include control rooms, remote shutdown panels, cable spreading rooms, the equipment rooms, auxiliary instrument rooms, relay rooms, and other areas (e.g.,

turbine deck) where safety-related I&C system installations are planned. The operating envelopes are acceptable for analog, digital, and hybrid system installations.

4.1 CE101-Conducted Emissions, Low Frequency of The CE101 test measures the low-frequency conducted emissions on power leads exempt equipment and subsystems in the frequency 30 Hz to 10 kHz. Equipment could be First, the power quality requirements of from this test if the following two conditions exist.

second, the equipment will the equipment are consistent with the existing power supply; and that not impose additional harmonic distortions on the existing power distribution system with a exceed 5% total harmonic distortion (THD) or other power quality criteria established ac and dc power leads, valid technical basis. When the test is desired, it is applicable to including grounds and neutrals, that obtain power from other sources not part of the applicable equipment under test. Conducted emissions on power leads should not exceed the dc-operated equipment and Figure 4.2 root mean square (rms) values shown in Figure 4.1 for equipment based for ac-operated equipment. Alternate envelopes are given for ac-operated on power consumption (less than or equal to 1 kVA and greater than 1 kVA). For ac operated equipment with a fundamental current (i.e., load current at the power line frequency) greater than 1 ampere, the envelopes in Figure 4.2 may be relaxed as follows:

dB relaxation = 20 log(fundamental current) 4.2 CE102-Conducted Emissions, High Frequency of The CE102 test measures the high-frequency conducted emissions on power leads The test is applicable equipment and subsystems in the frequency range 10 kHz to 10 MHz.

other to ac and dc power leads, including grounds and neutrals, that obtain power from test. Conducted emissions on power leads sources that are not part of the equipment under The values are specified should not exceed the applicable rms values shown in Figure 4.3.

according to the voltage of the power source feeding the equipment under test.

1.180-12

160 150 140 130 1 20 03 0

1 10 1'00 d 95 90 80 30 Hz 2 kHz 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Frequency (kHz)

Figure 4.1 CE101 Emissions Envelopes for dc Power Leads a-,

C.

140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 1.15 kHz 0.01 1 Frequency (kHz)

Figure 4.2 CE101 Emissions Envelopes for ac Power Leads 1.180-13

110 100 94 28V

- 90 7-7" .......................

o 73 73 0 70 60 -_ _ _ _ _ _ _

so .6 A1 50 .s, .,,: .23 .5 0.001 0.01 0.lisa 1 10 100 Frequency (MHz)

Figure 4.3 CE102 Emissions Envelopes 4.3 CS101-Conducted Susceptibility, Low Frequency The CS101 test ensures that equipment and subsystems are not susceptible to EMI/RFI present on power leads in the frequency range 30 Hz to 50 kHz. The test is applicable to ac and dc input power leads, not including grounds and neutrals. If the equipment under test is dc operated, this test is applicable over the frequency range 30 Hz to 50 kHz. If the equipment under test is ac operated, this test is applicable starting from the second harmonic of the power line frequency and extending to 50 kHz.

The equipment under test should not exhibit any malfunction or degradation of performance beyond specified operational tolerances when subjected to a test signal with the rms voltage levels specified in Figure 4.4. Alternative envelopes are given for equipment with nominal source voltages at or below 28 V and those operating above 28 V. The test criterion is also met when the power source specified in MIL-STD 462D, adjusted to dissipate 80 W in a 0.5-0 load, cannot develop the required voltage (specified in Figure 4.4) at the power input terminals and the equipment under test is not adversely affected by the output of the signal. Acceptable performance should be defined in the test plan by the end user or testing organization according to the applicable equipment, subsystem, or system specifications.

1.180-14

160 150 140 136 ------------- SOURCE VOLTAGE >28V

=L 0

0 0 130 126 ------------- _______ SOURCE VOLTAGE S28V 120 110 "106 100 0.01 0.1 1 5 10 100 Frequency (kHz)

Figure 4.4 CS101 Operating Envelope 4.4 CS114-Conducted Susceptibility, High Frequency The CS 114 test simulates currents that will be developed on leads as a result of EMI/RFI generated by antenna transmissions. The test covers the frequency range 10 kHz to 400 MHz and is applicable to all interconnecting leads, including the power leads of the equipment under test. Equipment tested under the RS103 test may be exempted from application of this test in the frequency band from 30 MHz to 400 MHz. Although the CS114 test can be applied to assess signal line susceptibility, the test levels given apply only to power and control lines.

The equipment under test should not exhibit any malfunction or degradation of performance beyond specified operational tolerances when subjected to a test signal with the rms levels shown in Figure 4.5. Acceptable performance should be defmied in the test plan by the end user or testing organization according to the applicable equipment, subsystem, or system specifications.

1.180-15

120 110 103 100

- 90 o 80 70 60 30 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 Frequency (MHz)

Figure 4.5 CS114 Operating Envelope 4.5 RE101-Radiated Emissions, Magnetic Field range 30 The RE101 test measures radiated magnetic field emissions in the frequency Hz to 100 kHz. Equipment not intended to be installed in areas with other equipment for sensitive to magnetic fields could be exempt from this test. The test is applicable leads.

emissions from equipment and subsystem enclosures as well as all interconnecting from The test does not apply at transmitter fundamental frequencies or to radiation of the levels shown in antennas. Magnetic field emissions should not be radiated in excess specified Figure 4.6. Magnetic field emissions maybe measured at either one of the distances of 7 cm or 50 cm and compared against the corresponding envelope.

4.6 RE102-Radiated Emissions, Electric Field range 10 The RE102 test measures radiated electric field emissions in the frequency subsystem enclosures, as kHz to 1 GHz. It is applicable for emissions from equipment and well as all interconnecting leads. The test does not apply at transmitter fundamental frequencies or to radiation from antennas.

in Electric field emissions should not be radiated in excess of the rms values shown for both Figure 4.7. At frequencies above 30 MHz, the test criterion should be met horizontally and vertically polarized fields.

1.180-16

180 160 140 128 -------- Envelope st 7 cm "to 120 __

U. 100 _

m 0 Eneop St 50 cm S

80 ___

60 __...

40 20 30__

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 Frequency (kHz)

Figure 4.6 RE101 Magnetic Field Emissions Envelopes 110 100

.E

=:L 90 0

CO I 80 U,.

70 w

60 50 0.01 1 10 Frequency (MHz)

Figure 4.7 RE102 Emissions Envelope 1.180-17

4.7 RS101-Radiated Susceptibility, Magnetic Fields The RS101 test ensures that equipment and subsystems are not susceptible to that is not radiated magnetic fields in the frequency range 30 Hz to 100 kHz. Equipment intended to be installed in areas with strong sources of magnetic fields (e.g., CRTs, motors, in this cable bundles carrying high currents) and that follows the limiting practices endorsed to equipment and regulatory guide could be exempt from this test. The test is applicable subsystem enclosures and all interconnecting leads. The test is not applicable for electromagnetic coupling via antennas.

of The equipment under test should not exhibit any malfunction or degradation magnetic performance beyond specified operational tolerances when subjected to the rms should be defined in the test plan field levels shown in Figure 4.8. Acceptable performance equipment, subsystem, or by the end user or testing organization according to the applicable system specifications.

190 ISO .........

170 C

m150 .. . . . . .. . . . .

ir 130 lie S110 90 70 60Hz 1_01 01 0 0.01 0.1 10 100 1000 Frequency (kHz)

Figure 4.8 RS101 Operating Envelope 4.8 RS103-Radiated Susceptibility, Electric Fields The RS103 test ensures that equipment and subsystems are not susceptible to radiated electric fields in the frequency range 10 kHz to 1 GHz. Equipment tested under the CS114 test may be exempted from application of this test in the frequency band from 10 kHz to 30 MHz. The test is applicable to equipment and subsystem enclosures and all interconnecting leads. The test is not applicable at the tuned frequency of antenna connected receivers, unless otherwise specified.

1.180-18

The equipment under test should not exhibit any malfunction or degradation of performance beyond specified operational tolerances when subjected to the radiated electric fields. The impressed electric field level should be 10 V/n (rms), measured in accordance with the techniques specified in the RS103 test method. The test criterion should be met for both horizontally and vertically polarized fields. According to MIL-STD 462D, circularly polarized fields are not acceptable because radiated electric fields are typically linearly polarized. Acceptable performance should be defined in the test plan by the end user or testing organization according to the applicable equipment, subsystem, or system specifications.

5. TEST METHODS, MIL-STD 462 The test methods that demonstrate compliance with the MIL-STD 461C EMI/RFI test criteria are specified in MIL-STD 462, 'Measurement of Electromagnetic Interference Characteristics." The test methods from MIL-STD 462 that correspond to the endorsed EMI/RFI test criteria listed in Table 3 are discussed below. These methods are acceptable to the NRC staff for accomplishing EMI/RFI testing for safety-related I&C systems intended for installation in nuclear power plants.

General operating envelopes that are acceptable to the NRC staff are also given below in the discussion of the MIL-STD 462 test methods. The operating envelopes are tailored to the nuclear power plant electromagnetic environment and serve to establish testing levels for the assessment of EMI/RFI emissions and susceptibility. These operating envelopes are acceptable for locations where safety-related I&C systems either are or are likely to be installed and include control rooms, remote shutdown panels, cable spreading rooms, equipment rooms, auxiliary instrument rooms, relay rooms, and other areas (e.g., the turbine deck) where safety-related I&C system installations are planned. The operating envelopes are acceptable for analog, digital, and hybrid system installations.

5.1 CE01-Conducted Emissions, Low Frequency The CE01 test measures the low-frequency conducted emissions on power leads of equipment and subsystems in the frequency range 30 Hz to 15 kHz. Equipment could be exempt from this test if first, the power quality requirements of the equipment are consistent with the existing power supply, and second, the equipment will not impose additional harmonic distortions on the existing power distribution system that exceed 5% total harmonic distortion (THD) or other power quality criteria established with a valid technical basis. When the test is desired, it is applicable to ac and dc power leads, including grounds and neutrals, that are not grounded internally to the equipment or subsystem.

The test is not applicable to interconnecting signal leads.

The CE01 test is applicable for emissions on dc power leads from 30 Hz to 15 kHz.

Conducted emissions on dc power leads in excess of the values shown ui Figure 5.1 should not appear when measured with an effective bandwidth not exceeding 75 Hz.

The CE01 test is applicable for emissions on ac power leads from the power line frequency to 15 kHz for low power consumption equipment (less than or equal to 1 kVA) and from the first harmonic of the power line frequency to 15 kHz for high power consumption equipment (greater than 1 kVA). Emissions on ac power leads in excess of the rms values shown in Figure 5.2 should 1.180-19

not appear when measured with an effective bandwidth not exceeding the power line States). For ac frequency plus 20% of the power line frequency (i.e., 72 Hz in the United power line operated equipment with a fundamental current (i.e., load current at the be relaxed as follows:

frequency) greater than 1 ampere, the envelopes in Figure 5.2 may dB relaxation = 20 log(fundamental current).

5.2 CE03-Conducted Emissions, High Frequency leads of The CE03 test measures the high-frequency conducted emissions on power The test applicable is equipment and subsystems in the frequency range 15 kHz to 50 MHz.

internally to to ac and dc power leads, including grounds and neutrals, that are not grounded leads.

interconnecting signal the equipment or subsystem. The test is not applicable to values shown Conducted emissions should not appear on the power leads in excess of the rms are not in Figure 5.3 for narrowband emissions. Broadband emissions measurements necessary.

180 150 140 DC POWER LEADS 120

= 110 100 90 2 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Frequency (kHz)

Figure 5.1 CEO0 Emissions Envelope for dc Power Leads 1.180-20

140 130 12o0i AC POWER LEADS

' 100

= 90

AC POWER>lkVAl **- 86 80 70 60 00Hz 1"26 Hz 1.15 kHz 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Frequency (kHz)

Figure 5.2 CE01 Emissions Envelope for ac Power Leads 90 86 -.

80 70 60 o 50 49 409 .............. ~ ~......~~~~-- . --.... .. ...... 4 .5 40.

39 30 - 225 kHz 500 kHz 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Frequency (MHz)

Figure 5.3 CE03 Narrowband Emissions Envelope 1.180-21

measurement The terms narrowband and broadband refer to the values for the A factor of 10 is typically receiver bandwidths to be employed during the emissions testing.

and broadband bandwidths, and it is specified as the separation between the narrowband sources. If the used to differentiate between narrowband and broadband interference in the bandwidth by a interference is broadband (e.g., arc welders and motors), a reduction least a 6 dB drop in the factor of 10 on the measurement receiver should result in at be narrowband (e.g., two-way interference level. Otherwise, the interference is considered to radios).

5.3 CS01-Conducted Susceptibility, Low Frequency susceptible to voltage The CS01 test ensures that equipment and subsystems are not to 50 kHz. The test is distortions present on the power leads in the frequency range 30 Hz that are not grounded applicable to ac and dc power leads, including grounds and neutrals, at frequencies within internally to the equipment or subsystem. The test is not applicable

+/-5%of the power line frequency (i.e., 57-63 Hz in the United States).

of The equipment under test should not exhibit any malfunction or degradation to electromagnetic performance beyond specified operational tolerances when subjected in Figure 5.4. The energy injected onto its power leads at the levels and frequencies given 462, adjusted to test criterion can also be met when the power source specified in MIL-STD (specified in Figure 5.4) dissipate 50 W into a 0.5-0 load, cannot develop the required voltage equipment is not adversely at the power input terminals of the equipment under test and the be defined in the affected by the output of the signal source. Acceptable performance should equipment, test plan by the end user or testing organization according to the applicable subsystem, or system specifications.

5.4 CS02-Conducted Susceptibility, High Frequency frequency The CS02 test is similar to the CS01 test except that it covers the higher subsystem ac and range 50 kHz to 400 MHz. The CS02 test is applicable to equipment-and internally to the dc power leads, including grounds and neutrals, that are not grounded equipment or subsystem.

of The equipment under test should not exhibit any malfunction or degradation Vrms from a 50-0 performance beyond specified operational tolerances when subjected to 7 should be applied directly to source across the frequency range cited above. The test signal can also be the equipment input terminals, not through its power line cord. The criterion input terminals of met when a 1-W source of 50-0 impedance cannot develop 7 Vrms at the affected by the output of the the equipment under test and the equipment is not adversely plan by the end user or signal source. Acceptable performance should be defined in the test or system testing organization according to the applicable equipment, subsystem, specifications.

1.180-22

8 El E2 6

E 5 0) 4 Line El to E2 (30 Hz to 1.5 kHz) - 10%

0 o of supply voltage or 6.3 Vrms, whichever 0 3 is less, but not less than 2.3 Vrms.

Line E2 to E3 is obtained by drawing 2 a straight line from the adjusted point E3 E2 to the fixed point E3 (2.3 Vrms). 2.3 Vrms 1

0 0.01 0.1 1 10 10 0 Frequency (kHz)

Figure 5.4 CS01 Operating Envelope 5.5 RE01-Radiated Emissions, Magnetic Field The RE01 test measures the radiated magnetic field emissions from equipment and subsystems in the frequency range 30 Hz to 50 kHz. Equipment not intended to be installed in areas with other equipment sensitive to magnetic fields could be exempt from this test.

Also, the test does not apply to radiation from antennas. When the test is desired, levels should be measured with a receiving antenna positioned 7 cm from the surface of the equipment under test. Radiated magnetic field emissions should not appear at the receiving antenna in excess of the rms values shown in Figure 5.5.

5.6 RE02-Radiated Emissions, Electric Field The RE02 test measures the radiated electric field emissions from equipment and subsystems in the frequency range 14 kHz to 1 GHz. The test does not apply to radiation from antennas, Levels should be measured with receiving antennas positioned 1 m from the surface of the equipment under test. Radiated electric field emissions should not appear at the receiving antennas in excess of the rms values shown ni Figure 5.6 for narrowband emissions. Broadband emissions measurements are not necessary.

The terms narrowband and broadband refer to the values for the measurement receiver bandwidths to be employed during the emissions testing. A factor of 10 is typically specified as the separation between the narrowband and broadband bandwidths, and it is 1.180-23

200 180 160 V 140 U. 120

- 98 S100 O 80 60 40.01 0.1 1 10 100 Frequency (kHz)

Figure 5.5 REO0 Magnetic Field Emissions Envelope 110 100 93..

80 s

60 1 ......... ........................

60 so 2: 10, 0.01 0.1 110 100 Frequency (MHz)

Figure 5.6 RE02 Narrowband Emissions Envelope 1.180-24

used to differentiate between narrowband and broadband interference sources. If the inter ference is broadband (e.g., arc welders and motors), a reduction in the bandwidth by a factor of 10 on the measurement receiver should result in at least a 6 dB drop in the interference level. Otherwise, the interference is considered to be narrowband (e.g.,

two-way radios).

5.7 RS01-Radiated Susceptibility, Magnetic Fields The RS01 test ensures that equipment and subsystems are not susceptible magnetic fields in the frequency range 30 Hz to 50 kHz. Equipment to radiated that is not intended to be installed in areas with strong sources of magnetic fields (e.g., CRTs, motors, cable bundles carrying high currents) and that follows the limiting practices endorsed in this regulatory guide could be exempt from this test. A radiating loop antenna, positioned 5 cm from the equipment under test, is used to generate the magnetic fields.

The equipment under test should not exhibit any malfunction or degradation performance beyond specified operational tolerances when subjected to of the rms magnetic field levels and frequencies shown in Figure 5.7. The level of the imposed field is to be measured with a field strength meter positioned at the surface of the equipment under test.

Acceptable performance should be defined in the test plan by the end user organization according to the applicable equipment, subsystem, or system or testing specifications.

5.8 RS03-Radiated Susceptibility, Electric Fields The RS03 test ensures that equipment and subsystems are not susceptible electric fields in the frequency range 14 kHz to 1 GHz. The fields are to radiated to be generated with high-impedance antennas selected to cover the specified frequency range.

190 180.

170 R

C.

m 150

-o CL 130 4 122 0D 0 110 90 70 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Frequency (kHz)

Figure 5.7 RS01 Operating Envelope 1.180-25

or degradation of The equipment under test should not exhibit any malfunction subjected to radiated electric performance beyond specified operational tolerances when measured at the surface of fields. The electric field level impressed should be 10 V/m (rms),

Acceptable performance should be the equipment under test with a field strength meter.

according to the applicable defined in the test plan by the end user or testing organization equipment, subsystem, or system specifications.

IEEE STD C62.45-1992

6. PRACTICES IN IEEE.STD C62.41-1991 AND in 1995), "IEEE The SWC practices described in IEEE Std C62.41-1991 (Reaffirmed AC Power Circuits,"' and IEEE Recommended Practice on Surge Voltages in Low-Voltage Connected to Low-Voltage Std C62.45-1992, -IEEE Guide on Surge Testing for Equipmentthe effect of power surges on AC Power Circuits,"' are acceptable to the NRC staff regarding Std C62.41,1991 defines a set of safety-related I&C systems in nuclear power plants. IEEE and represents a baseline surge surge test waveforms that has manageable dimensions test methods and equipment environment. IEEE Std C62.45-1992 describes the associated environmental conditions for power to be employed when performing the surge tests. Typical waveforms given in Table 4.

surges in a nuclear power plant can be represented by the Table 4 Representative Power Surge Waveforms Ring Wave Combination Wave EFT Parameter Open-circuit Open-circuit Short-circuit Pulses in Waveform voltage voltage current 15-ms bursts 0.5 gs 1.2 ps 8 Is 5 ns Rise time 100 kHz 50 ps 20 ps 50 ns Duration ringing are given with each General withstand levels that are acceptable to the NRC staff categories and exposure levels surge waveform. IEEE Std C62.41-1991 describes location that should provide an that define applicable amplitudes for the surge waveforms the proximity of equipment to the appropriate degree of SWC. Location categories depend on levels relate to the rate of service entrance and the associated line impedance. Exposure which equipment is exposed.

surge occurrence versus the voltage level (e.g., surge crest) to are based on Category B locations The withstand levels presented in this regulatory position and short branch circuits less and Low to Medium Exposure levels. Category B covers feeders Exposure levels encompass than 10 meters from the service entrance. Low to Medium and low-power surge activity to systems in areas known for little load or capacitor switching to high-power surge activity.

areas known for significant switching transients or medium-that the general power The basis for the withstand levels provides reasonable assurance The withstand surge environment in nuclear power plants is adequately characterized.

systems either are or are likely levels are acceptable for locations where safety-related I&C panels, cable spreading rooms, to be installed and include control rooms, remote shutdown 1.180-26

equipment rooms, auxiliary instrument rooms, relay rooms, and other areas (e.g., the turbine deck) where safety-related I&C system installations are planned.

6.1 Ring Wave The Ring Wave simulates oscillatory surges of relatively high frequency on the ac power leads of equipment and subsystems and is represented by an open-circuit voltage waveform. The waveform is an 100-kHz sinusoid having an initial rise time of 0.5 ps and continually decaying amplitude. A plot of the waveform is shown in Figure 6.1. The rise time is defined as the time difference between the 10% and 90%

amplitude points on the leading edge of the waveform. The amplitude of the waveform decays with each peak being 60% of the amplitude of the preceding peak of the opposite polarity.

VP, the peak voltage value of the Ring Wave, should be 3 kV.

During the performance of the test, the equipment under test should not exhibit any malfunction or degradation of performance beyond specified operational tolerances when subjected to the Ring Wave.

Acceptable performance of the equipment under test should be defined in the test plan by the end user or testing organization according to the applicable equipment, subsystem, or system specifications.

6.2 Combination Wave The Combination Wave involves two exponential waveforms, an open-circuit voltage and a short-circuit current. It is intended to represent direct lightning discharges, fuse operation, or capacitor switching on the ac power leads of equipment and subsystems. The open-circuit voltage waveform has a 1.2-ps rise time and an exponential decay with a duration (to 50% of initial peak level) of 50 ps. The short-circuit current waveform has an 8 lis rise time and a duration of 20 ps. Plots of the waveforms are shown in Figures 6.2 and 6.3.

The rise time is defined as the time difference between the 10%

and 90% amplitude points on the leading edge of the waveform. The duration is defmied as the time between virtual origin and the time at the 50% amplitude point on the tail of the waveform. Virtual origin is the point where a straight line between the 30% and 90% points on the leading edge of the waveform intersects the V=0 line for the open-circuit voltage and the i=0 line for the short-circuit current.

V,, the peak value of the open-circuit voltage of the Combination Wave, should be 3 kV. IP, the peak value of the short-circuit current, should be 1.5 kA. During the performance of the test, the equipment under test should not exhibit any malfunction or degradation of performance beyond specified operational tolerances when subjected to the Combination Wave. Acceptable performance of the equipment under test should be defined in the test plan by the end user or testing organization according to the applicable equipment, subsystem, or system specifications.

1.180-27

RISE TIME - 0.5 Ps 1.00 0.50 o.

> 0.00

-0.50

-1.00 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 Time (Ps)

Figure 6.1 100-kHz Ring Wave 1.0 0.8 RISE TIME -. 2 ps 0.6 DURATION- 5O p, 0.4 0.2 0.0 90 100) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Time (Ips)

Figure 6.2 Combination Wave, Open-Circuit Voltage 1.180-28

1.0 0.8 0.6 - FRONT TIME - 8rn DURATION - 20 ps 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (ps)

Figure 6.3 Combination Wave, Short-Circuit Current 6.3 Electrically Fast Transients The EFT waveform consists of repetitive bursts, with each burst containing individual unidirectional pulses, and is intended to represent local load switching on the ac power leads of equipment and subsystems. The individual EFT pulses have a 5-ns rise time and a duration (width at half-maximum) of 50 ns. Plots of the EFT pulse waveform and the pattern of the EFT bursts are shown in Figures 6.4 and 6.5. The number of pulses in a burst is determined by the pulse frequency. For peaks less than or equal to 2 kV, the frequency will be 5 kHz+/-1 kHz. For peaks greater than 2 kV, the frequency will be 2.5 kHz+/-_.5 kHz.

The differences in repetition rates are not intended to reflect characteristics of the power surge environment but to accommodate existing limitations in pulse generator performance.

The rise time is defined as the time difference between the 10% and 90% amplitude points on the leading edge of the waveform. The duration is defined as the time between the 50% amplitude points on the leading and trailing edges of each individual pulse. Individual pulses occur in bursts of 15 ms duration.

The peak value of the individual EFT pulses should be 3 kV. During the performance of the test, the equipment under test should not exhibit any malfunction or degradation of performance beyond specified operational tolerances when subjected to the EFT pulses.

1.180-29

1.0 0.8 0.

0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Time (ns)

Figure 6.4 Waveform of the EFT Pulse VOLTAGE K)

• I TIME BURST DURATION - 15 ms B P K BURST PERIOD Figure 6.5 Pattern of EFT Bursts Acceptable performance of the equipment under test should be defined in the test plan by the end user or testing organization according to the applicable equipment, subsystem, or system specifications.

7. DOCUMENTATION Electromagnetic compatibility documentation should provide evidence that safety.

related I&C equipment meets its specification requirements and is compatible with the projected electromagnetic environment, that the user adheres to acceptable installation 1.180-30

practices, and that administrative controls have been established covering the allowable proximity of portable EMI/RFI sources. Data used to demonstrate the compatibility of the equipment with its projected environment should be pertinent to the application and be organized in a readily understandable and traceable manner that permits independent auditing of the conclusion presented.

The content of electromagnetic compatibility documentation should contain the information listed below, as well as any additional information specified in the standards cited by this regulatory guide. These items, as a minimum, could be included as part of a qualification or dedication file.

(1) Identification of the equipment (2) Specifications on the equipment (3) Identification of safety functions to be demonstrated by test data (4) Test plan (5) Test results, including 5.1 Objective of the test 5.2 Detailed description of test item 5.3 Description of test setup, instrumentation, and calibration data 5.4 Test procedure 5.5 Summary of test data, accuracy, and anomalies (6) The installation practices employed and administrative controls established to alleviate potential EMI/RFI and power surge exposure (7) Summary and conclusions (8) Approval signature and date.

D. IMPLEMENTATION The purpose of this section is to provide information to applicants and licensees regarding the NRC staffs plans for using this regulatory guide. No backfitting is intended or approved in connection with this guide.

Except in those cases in which an applicant or licensee proposes acceptable alternative practices for complying with the specified portions of the NRC's regulations, the methods described in this guide will be used in the evaluation of submittals in connection with applications for construction permits, operating licenses, and combined licenses. This guide will also be used to evaluate submittals from operating reactor licensees that propose system modifications that are voluntarily initiated by the licensee if there is a clear connection between the proposed modifications and this guidance.

REGULATORY ANALYSIS A draft value/impact statement was published with the draft of this guide when it was published for public comment (Task DG-1029, February 1998). A Regulatory Analysis was prepared for this guide during the development of this final version to expand upon the original value/impact statement. A copy of the draft value/impact statement is available for inspection or copying in the NRC's Public Electronic Reading Room at <www.nrc.gov> under Draft Regulatory Guide DG- 1029 (February 1998). A copy of the Regulatory Analysis is available for inspection or copying in the NRC's Public Electronic Reading Room under Regulatory Guide 1.180.

1.180-31

) ) I UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 120555e4215 L08 US NRC-OCIO DIV INFORMATION MANAGEMENT IWFN-PI-17 RMB/DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK WASHINGTON, DC 20555 I