ML073250389

Technical Specifications for Oconee, Units 1, 2, and 3, Issuance of Amendments Regarding the Flood Protection Measures for the Auxiliary Building

ML073250389
Person / Time
Site:	Oconee
Issue date:	11/14/2007
From:	NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLII-1
To:	Duke Power Co
Olshan L N, NRR/DORL, 415-1419
Shared Package
ML072900268	List: ML072900272 ML073250389
References
TAC MD3589, TAC MD3590, TAC MD3591
Download: ML073250389 (3)

Text

Part 70; is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and to the rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect; and is subject to the additional conditions specified or Incorporated below:.

A. Maximum Power Level The licensee Is authorized to operate the facility at steady state reactor core power levels not In excess of 2568 megawatts thermal.

B. Technicai Specifications The Technical Spi-flcations contained In Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 357 are hereby Incorporated In the license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.

C. This license Is subject to the following antitrust conditions:

Applicant makes the commitments contained herein, recognizing that bulk power supply arrangements between neighboring entities normally tend to serve the public interest In addition, where there are net benefits to all participants, such arrangements also serve the best Interests of each of the participants. Among the benefrits of such transactions are Increased electdc system reliability, a reduction In the cost of electric power, and minimization of the environmental effects of the production and sale of electricity.

Any particular bulk power supply transaction may afford greater benefits to one participant than to another. The benefits realized by a small system may be proportionately greater than those realized by a larger system. The relative benefits to be derived by the parties from a proposed transaction, however, should not be controlling upon a decision with respect to the desirability of participating in the transaction. Accordingly, applicant will enter Into proposed bulk power transactions of the types hereinafter described which, on balance, provide net benefits to applicant. There are net benefits In a transaction ifapplicant recovers the cost of the transaction (as defined In ¶1 (d) hereof) and there Is no demonstrable net detriment to applicant arising from that transaction.

1. As used herein:

(a) 'Bulk Power4 means electric power and any attendant energy, supplied or made available at transmission or sub-transmissTon voltage by one electric system to another.

(b) Nelghbonng EntityV means a private or public corporation, a governmental agency or authority, a municipality, a cooperative, or a lawful association of any of the foregoing owning or operating, or Renewed License No. DPR-38 Amendment No 3 5 7

Part 70; is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and to the riues, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect; and Is subject to the additional conditions specified or Incorporated below:

A. Maximum Power Level The licensee Is authorized to operate the facility at steady state reactor core power levels not in excess of 2568 megawatts thermal.

B. Technical .pecifications The TArinical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No 359 ý3re hereby Incorporated In the license. The licensee shall operate the facility In accoroance with the Technical Specifications.

C. This license is subject to the following antitrust conditions:

Applicant makes the commitments contained herein, recognizing that bulk power supply arrangements between neighboring entities normally terd to serve the public Interest. In addition, where there are net benefits to all participants, such arrangements also serve the best Interests of each of the partidpanls. Among the benefits of such transactions are Increased electric system reliability, a reduction in the cost of electric power, and minimization of the environmental effects of the production and sale of electricity.

Any particular bulk power supply transaction may afford greater benefits to one participant than to another. The benefits realized by a small system may be proportionately greater than those realized by a larger system. The relative benefits to be derived by the parties from a proposed transaction, however, should not be contmiling upon a decision with respect to the desirability of participating In the transaction.. Accordingly, applicant will enter into proposed bulk power transactions of the types hereinafter described which, on balance. provide net benefits to applicant.

There are net benefits In a transaction ifapplicant recovers the cost of the transaction (as defined In ¶11(d) hereof) and there Is no demonstrable net detriment to applicant arising from that transaction.

1. As used herein:

(a) 'Bulk Power*means electric power and any attendant energy, supplied or made available at transmission or sub-ransmission voltage by one electric system to another.

(b) "Neighboring Entity' means a private or public corporation, a governmental agencyor authority, a municipality, a cooperative, or a lawful association of any of the foregoing owning or operating, or Renewed Ucense No. DPR-47 Amendment No. 359

Part 70; is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and to the rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter In effect; and is subject to the additional conditons specified or incorporated below:

A. Maximum Power Level The licensee Is authorized to operate the facility at steady state reactor core power levels not in excess of 2568 megawatts thermal.

B. Technical Specifications The Technical Sr'"ffications contained In Appendix A, as revised through Amendment Nc 358 are hereby Incorporated in the license. The licensee shall operate the faciity in accordance with the Technical Specifications.

C. This license Is subject to the following antitrust conditions:

Applicant makes the commitments contained herein, recognizing that bulk power supply arrangements betwedn neighboring entities normally tend to serve the public interest. In addition, where there are net benefits to-all participants, such arrangements also serve the best interests of each of the participants. Among the benefits of such transactions are Increased electric system reliability, a reduction in the cost of electric power, and minimization of the environmental effects of the production and sale of electricity.

Any particular bulk power supply transaction may afford greater benefits to one participant than to another. The benefits realized by a small system may be proportionately greater than those realized by.a larger system. The relative benefits to be derived by the parties from a proposed transaction, however, should not be controlling upon a decision with respect to the desirability of participating In the transaction. Accordingly, applicant will enter into proposed bulk power transactions of the types hereinafter described which, on balance, provide net benefits to applicant There are net benefits In a transaction Ifapplicant recovers the cost of the transaction (as defined In¶1 (d) hereof) and there Is no demonstrable net detriment to applicant arising from that transaction.

1. -As used herein:

(a) 'Bulk Power" means electric power and any attendant energy, supplied or made available at transmission or sub-transmission voltage by one electric system to another.

(b) mNeighboring Entity" means a private or public corporation, a governmental agency or authority, a municipality, a cooperative, or a lawful association of any of the foregoing owning or operating, or Renewed License No. DPR-55 Amendment No. 358