ML112210658

Audit of the Licensee Regulatory Commitment Management Program, Audit Performed July 19-20, 2011 (TAC Nos. ME6058 and ME6059)

ML112210658
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas
Issue date:	09/07/2011
From:	Balwant Singal Plant Licensing Branch IV
To:	Halpin E South Texas
Singal, Balwant, 415-3016, NRR/DORL/LPL4
References
TAC ME6058, TAC ME6059
Download: ML112210658 (16)

Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555*0001 September 7, 2011 Mr. Edward D. Halpin President and Chief Executive Officer!

Chief Nuclear Officer STP Nuclear Operating Company South Texas Project P.O. Box 289 VVadsworth, TX 77483 SUB.JECT: SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - AUDIT OF THE LICENSEE'S REGULATORY COMMITMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (TAC NOS. ME6058 AND ME6059)

Dear Mr. Halpin:

An audit of South Texas Project (STP), Units 1 and 2, commitment management program was performed at the plant site on July 19-20, 2011. In U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Regulatory Issue Summary 2000-17, "Managing Regulatory Commitments Made by Power Reactor Licensees to the NRC Staff," dated September 21, 2000, the NRC informed licensees that the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) document NEI 99-04, "Guidelines for Managing NRC Commitment Changes," contains acceptable guidance for controlling regulatory commitments and encouraged licensees to use the NEI guidance or similar administrative controls to ensure that regulatory commitments are implemented and that changes to the regulatory commitments are evaluated and, when appropriate, reported to NRC.

The NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation has instructed its staff to perform an audit of licensees' commitment management programs once every 3 years to determine whether the licensees' programs are consistent with the industry guidance in NEI 99-04, and that the regulatory commitments are being effectively implemented.

Based on the audit, the NRC staff concludes that STP Nuclear Operating Company (the licensee) has implemented NRC commitments on a timely basis, and the licensee has implemented an effective program for managing NRC commitment changes at STP, Units 1 and 2. The details of the results of the audit including the NRC staff's observations and recommendations are set forth in the enclosed audit report.

E. Halpin -2 If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-3016 or via e-mail at Balwant.Singal@nrc.gov.

Sincerely, b~t-4 t~I~~

Balwant K. Singal, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-498 and 50-499

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555*0001 AUDIT REPORT BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION LICENSEE MANAGEMENT OF REGULATORY COMMITMENTS STP NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT, UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-498 AND 50-499

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

In U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Regulatory Issue Summary 2000-17, "Managing Regulatory Commitments Made by Power Reactor Licensees to the NRC Staff," dated September 21, 2000 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)

Accession No. ML003741774), the NRC informed licensees that the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) document NEI 99-04, "Guidelines for Managing NRC Commitment Changes," contains acceptable guidance for controlling regulatory commitments and encouraged licensees to use the NEI guidance or similar administrative controls to ensure that commitments are implemented and that changes to the commitments are evaluated and, when appropriate, reported to NRC.

The NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) has instructed its staff to perform an audit of licensees' commitment management programs once every 3 years to determine whether the licensees' programs are consistent with the industry guidance in NEI 99-04, and that the regulatory commitments are being effectively implemented.

NEI 99-04 defines a "regulatory commitment" as an explicit statement to take a specific action agreed to, or volunteered by, a licensee and submitted in writing on the docket to the NRC.

NRR guidelines direct the NRR Project Manager to audit the licensee's commitment management program by assessing the adequacy of the licensee's implementation of a sample of commitments made to the NRC in past licensing actions (amendments, relief requests, exemptions, etc.) and licensing activities (bulletins, generic letters, etc.). The audit is to be performed once every 3 years.

2.0 AUDIT PROCEDURE AND RESULTS An audit of South Texas Project (STP), Units 1 and 2, commitment management program was performed at the plant site on July 19-20, 2011. The audit reviewed commitments made by STP Nuclear Operating Company (STPNOC, the licensee) since the previous audit on August 19, Enclosure

- 2 2008, which was documented in an audit report dated December 24, 2008 (ADAMS Accession No. ML083450162). The audit consisted of two major parts: (1) verification of the licensee's implementation of NRC commitments that have been completed, and (2) verification of the licensee's program for managing changes to NRC commitments.

2.1 Verification of Licensee's Implementation of Commitments The primary focus of this part of the audit is to confirm that the licensee has implemented commitments made to the NRC as part of past licensing actions/activities. For commitments not yet implemented, the NRC staff determines whether they have been captured in an effective program for future implementation.

2.1.1 Audit Scope The audit addressed a sample of commitments made during the review period. The audit focused on regulatory commitments, as defined above, made in writing to the NRC as a result of past licensing actions (amendments, exemptions, relief requests, etc.) and licensing activities (bulletins, generic letters, etc.). Before the audit, the NRC staff performed a search in ADAMS for the licensee's submittals since the last audit and selected a representative sample of commitments for verification. The identified list of commitments was forwarded to the licensee on July 6, 2011, with a request to locate documentation for the listed commitments ahead of the NRC staff audit. The licensee did not perform a self-assessment of the commitments identified for this audit.

The audit excluded the following types of commitments that are internal to licensee processes:

(1) Commitments made on the licensee's own initiative among internal organizational components.

(2) Commitments that pertain to milestones of licensing actions/activities (e.g.,

responding to an NRC request for additional information by a certain date).

Fulfillment of these commitments was indicated by the fact that the subject licensing action/activity was completed.

(3) Commitments made as an internal reminder to take actions to comply with existing regulatory requirements such as regulations, Technical Specifications, and Updated Final Safety Analysis Reports. Fulfillment of these commitments was indicated by the licensee having taken timely action in accordance with the subject requirements.

2.1.2 Audit Results The licensee has implemented Procedure OPGP05-ZN-0002, Revision 5, "Licensing Commitment Management and Administration," which identifies the methods and responsibilities for the maintenance of commitments and the Regulatory Commitments Management Program, which is used to ensure that the commitments are properly identified, tracked, closed out, revised/changed, or deleted. The licensee uses the program to track the

-3 status and manage the closure of commitments at STP effectively. The licensee's Procedure OPGPOS-ZN-0002 is consistent with the guidance provided by NEI 99-04.

As discussed above, the licensee's program provides acceptable tools and guidance for the licensee to capture the NRC guidance on commitment management programs. The licensee enters the commitments made to the NRC into the program. The commitments are entered as Condition Records (CRs) in the Corrective Action Program Database (CAPD). The field for "Action Type" in the CR further identifies the CR as a regulatory commitment for the purposes of tracking. The status of the commitments, implementation dates, target implementation document information associated with each specific commitment, and comments are captured in the program.

The documents furnished by the licensee during the audit included summary sheets from the CAPD providing the status of the CR/commitments and appropriate backup documentation, as needed (i.e., plant procedures, examination records, and/or other plant documentation incorporating the commitments). The NRC staff reviewed the documents and summarized the results of the review of the selected commitments in the attached table to this audit report.

The NRC staff's audit was intended to confirm that the licensee has documented its implementation of commitments made to the NRC staff as part of past licensing communications, and the commitments that had not yet been implemented or incorporated in design bases documents are captured in an effective manner for future implementation.

The NRC staffs audit of the licensee's commitment management program for STP, Units 1 and 2, identified the following deficiencies (refer to the attached table to this report for the CR number and description of each individual CR):

• Condition Record 08-9676-2S: The CR was not coded as a regulatory commitment as required by the licensee's Procedure OPGPOS-ZN-0002, Revision S. At the conclusion of this audit, the licensee was in the process of correcting the error.

• Condition Record 11-S788-2: The commitment was entered into the CAPD as a regulatory commitment, but incorrectly coded as not docketed. At the conclusion of this audit, the licensee was in the process of correcting the error.

The results of the review indicated that the commitments were implemented and/or incorporated satisfactorily and the licensee has an effective commitment management program, with the exception of the deficiencies detailed above. The deficiencies identified above had no safety significance and the licensee was in the process of correcting the deficiencies.

Also, the target document (e.g., procedures) listed the commitments contained in the document in a section entitled "References." To ensure that commitments are not removed or changed in future revisions to the target documents, the target documents clearly identified the areas incorporating specific commitments by reference to the CR number.

-4 Based on the results of the on-site audit, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee has implemented the regulatory commitment management program adequately and consistent with NEI 99-04, except for the deficiencies identified during the audit.

2.2 Verification of the Licensee's Program for Managing NRC Commitment Changes 2.2.1 Audit Scope The primary focus of this part of the audit is to verify that the licensee has established administrative controls for modifying or deleting commitments made to the NRC. The NRC staff compared the licensee's process for controlling commitments to the guidelines in NEI 99-04, which the NRC has found to be an acceptable guide for licensees to follow for managing and changing commitments. The process used at STP, Units 1 and 2, is contained in Procedure OPGP05-ZN-0002, Revision 5. The primary focus of the audit was to ensure that the commitments are implemented without a change and if a change is made, it is in accordance with the approved plant procedures and with the approval of the plant's management. The audit also verified that the licensee's commitment management system includes a mechanism to ensure traceability of commitments following initial implementation. This ensures that the licensee's personnel are able to recognize that future proposed changes to the affected design features or operating practices require evaluation in accordance with the commitment change control process.

2.2.2 Audit Results No other commitment changes were identified during the audit, except for changes to the implementation dates for some of the commitments. In all such cases, the licensee generated a Commitment Evaluation Form in accordance with the plant procedures and the review by NRC concluded that the justifications provided by the licensee were adequate.

Based on its review, the NRC staff concludes that the changes to regulatory commitments are being reported to NRC consistent with the NRC guidance.

3.0 OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Deficiencies in the commitment management program identified during the NRC audit are identified in Section 2.1.2 of this report. These deficiencies had no safety significance and at the conclusion of the audit, the licensee was in the process of correcting the deficiencies.

However, based on the NRC staff's review, the staff would like to make the following recommendation:

Presently, the CR containing the specific regulatory commitment is identified in the reference section and the body of the target document being revised without any specific markings for the area of change. This makes it difficult to locate the sections of the target document containing regulatory commitments. The licensee agreed to identify the regulatory commitments in the margin area of the target documents (e.g. procedures) for easy traceability and to eliminate the potential for unintentional change to the commitment in future.

-5

4.0 CONCLUSION

Based on the results of the audit, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee has implemented the commitment management program effectively, and implemented commitment changes appropriately consistent with NEI 99-04. The licensee was in the process of taking action to correct the deficiencies identified during the audit. The deficiencies identified during the audit did not have any safety significance.

5.0 LICENSEE PERSONNEL CONTACTED FOR THIS AUDIT Marilyn Kistler Wayne Harrison Principal Contributors: B. Singal R. Grover Date: September 7, 2011

Attachment:

Audit Summary Table

Summary of Audit of Regulatory Commitments and Results of Audit Performed on July 19-20, 2011 STP Nuclear Operating Company South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-498 and 50-499 Condition Letter No. Subject Record No. Description of Commitment Implementation Status NOC-AE-08002328 Request to CR 02-5326-111 The test will be structured to determine one Closed on 811312008.

6/26/2008 (ADAMS Extend or n ore debris load combinations that can Accession No. Implementation be r itigated by the South Texas Project The commitment was entered into the ML081890190) Date for (STP) sump strainers. (Complete by test Corrective Action Program Database Emergency Core corr pletion date, currently 7/30/2008). (CAPO) as a regulatory commitment.

Cooling System Sump Design The results of the test specified in the Basis Condition Record (CR) were acceptable and, as a result, the CR was closed.

---

+-1 --------------------~

CR 02-5326-112 STF will consider contingencies listed in the Closed on 8/13/2008.

cov r letter should strainer testing not den onstrate satisfactory performance. The commitment was entered into the (Complete by test completion date, currently CAPO as a regulatory commitment.

7/3( 12008).

The results of the strainer test specified in the CR were determined to be acceptable and the CR was closed.

.... --------- ------ --------------11-------'-----**

CR 02-5326-113 Tes ng plan and contingency options Open.

pr01 de assurance that the Generic Safety ISSl e (GSI)-191 and Generic Letter (GL) The commitment was entered into the 200 -02 issues will be resolved for STP, CAPO as a regulatory commitment.

Unil s 1 and 2, by 12/31/2009.

The completion date was changed to 4/1/2012. Commitment Evaluation Form documenting the justification for the extension was reviewed and the I ch<3~ge was found acceptable.

---

~

Attachment

- 2 Condition Letter No. Subject Record No. Description of Commitment Implementation Status NOC-AE-08002372 Response to CR 02-5326-120 When a final Safety Evaluation for Open.

12/11/2008 Generic Letter WCAP-16793. "Long Term Cooling" is (ADAMS 2004-02 issued, STP will review it for impact on its The commitment is identified as a Accession No. long-term cooling methodology. regulatory commitment in the CAPD.

ML083520326) Expected completion date: 6/30/2009.

The commitment completion date has been changed to 12/15/2011. The Commitment Evaluation Form justifying the change in completion date was reviewed and the change was found acceptable.

NOC-AE-09002389 License 09-1587-2 Removal of the plant-specific Technical Closed on 10/1/2009.

31312009 (ADAMS Amendment Specification (TS) requirements will be Accession No. Request for performed concurrently with the The commitment was identified as a ML090690687) Adoption of implementation of the 10 CFR Part 26. regulatory commitment in the CAPD.

TSTF-511. Subpart I requirements. This commitment Revision 0, will be completed no later than the The commitment is fully met as "Eliminate implementation deadline of 10/1/2009. reflected in TS Amendment Nos. 192 Working Hour for STP, Unit 1, and 180 for STP.

Restrictions From Unit 2.

TS 5.2.2 To Support Compliance With 10 CFR Part 26."

NOC-AE-09002477 Revised Request 09-10811-4 When the Fitness for Duty Rule for Open.

10/14/2009 for Exemption Managing Fatigue is changed and an (ADAMS from Certain exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR The commitment is identified as a Accession No. Requirements of 26.205(c) and (d) for meeting work hour regulatory commitment in the CAPD.

ML092930172) the Fitness for controls during declarations of severe Duty Rule for weather conditions involving tropical storm The licensee has already received Managing or hurricane force winds is no longer approval for the exemption. However, Fatigue needed, STP Nuclear Operating Company the licensee needs to issue a letter to (STPNOC) will submit a letter to the NRC the NRC by 12/31/2011. to confirm that stating that the exemption is no longer the exemption is no longer required.

needed by 12/3112011.

-3 r~~

Condition Letter No. Subject Record No. Description of Commitment Implementation Status .

NOC-AE-09002480 License 09-10761-6 STPNOC will have implemented the Closed on 7/26/2010.

11/19/2009 Amendment requirements of 10 CFR 73.54. 60 months (ADAMS Request for after NRC approval of the STPNOC Cyber The commitment was entered into the Accession No. Approval of Security Plan. CAPO as a regulatory commitment.

ML093280720) Cyber Security Plan The license amendment request was withdrawn by the licensee by letter dated 7/27/2010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML102150159). and the commitment is no longer valid.

NOC-AE-10002558 Licensee 09-10811-9 The conditions necessary to sequester site Closed on 8/31/2010.

5/10/2010 (ADAMS Commitment personnel that are consistent with the Accession No. Regarding a conditions specified in the exemption The commitment is identified as a ML101340116) Request for request (NOC-AE-09002477. ADAMS regulatory commitment in the CAPO.

Exemption from Accession No. ML092930172). on approval Certain of the request for exemption will be Procedure OPGP03-ZV-0002.

Requirements of maintained in the site procedures. Revision 5 incorporates the the Fitness for Duty Rule for 09-10811-9 Provisions for ensuring that personnel who commitment.

Closed on 8/3112010.

I Managing are not performing duties are provided an Fatigue opportunity as well as accommodations for The commitment is identified as a restorative rest on approval of the request regulatory commitment in the CAPO.

for exemption will be maintained in the site procedures. Procedure OPGP03-ZV-0002, Revision 5 incorporates the commitment. I 09-10811-9 The condition for departure from the Closed on 8/31/2010.

exemption is based on the Emergency Operations Facility Director's determination The commitment is identified as a that adequate staffing is available to meet regulatory commitment in the CAPO.

the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) on approval of the request for exemption Procedure OPGP03-ZV-0002. Revision

~---~

will be maintained in the site procedures.

--~~

5 incorporates the commitment.

-4 Condition Letter No. Subject Record No. Description of Commitment Implementation Status NOC-AE-10002594 Request for 08-9676-25 If a containment spray (CS), low head safety Closed on 10/27/2010.

9/20/2010 (ADAMS Relief from injection (LHSI), or high head safety Accession No. ASME Section XI injection (HHSI) pump is disassembled Verified procedure OPGP03-ZE-0027 ML102700175) Code during the third inspection interval, STPNOC (Revision 29), Addendum 6, Section Requirements for will perform the Code-required surface 5.0. The commitment was entered into Pump Casing examination of the pump casing welds the CAPO as CR 8-9676-25, but was Inservice within the pump pit by 12/12/2010 not coded as a regulatory commitment.

Inspection (incorporation into procedure). The licensee was in the process of Examination correcting the error.

NOC-AE-10002623 Revision to 10-24696-03 Lead Test Assembly (LTA) measured data Open.

12/21/2010 Technical and favorable results from visual (ADAMS Specifications examinations of once, twice, and thrice Commitment entered into CAPO as a Accession No. 5.3.1 and 6.9.1.6 burned LT As confirm, for three cycles of regulatory commitment.

ML103630408) to Allow Fuel operation, that the current fuel performance Assemblies with models are applicable for Optimized The commitment to be incorporated Optimized ZIRLO' clad fuel rods. Westinghouse will prior to loading fuel rods with ZIRLO' continue to provide additional data from the Optimized ZIRLO' cladding.

Cladding Optimized ZIRLO' LTA programs to the NRC as it becomes available.

It is stated in the commitment that confirmation of the approved models' applicability up through the projected end of cycle burnup for the Optimized ZIRLO' fuel rods must be completed prior to their initial batch loading and prior to the startup of subsequent cycles. It further states that until the commitment is complete, STPNOC will confirm that, as higher burnupslfluences are achieved for Optimized ZIRLO' clad fuel rods, the requirements of this condition are met as it applies to STP, Units 1 and 2.

-5 Condition Letter No. Subject Record No. Description of Commitment Implementation Status NOC-AE-10002623 Revision to 10-24696-04 Data from three cycles of operation have Open.

Technical been evaluated and the fuel rod creep (continued) Specifications models from fuel rod design codes have Verified the CAPO. Commitment 5.3.1 and 6.9.1.6 been used to predict growth and creep entered into CAPO as a regulatory to Allow Fuel performance of the samples. This commitment Assemblies with information was provided to the NRC in the Optimized most recent informational letter (V LTR- The commitment to be incorporated ZIRLO' NRC-10-43) dated 7/26/2010. Confirmation prior to loading fuel rods with Cladding of the approved models' applicability up Optimized ZIRLO' cladding.

through the projected end of cycle burnup for the Optimized ZIRLOTM fuel rods must be completed prior to their initial batch loading and prior to the startup of subsequent cycles. Until the commitment is complete, STPNOC will confirm that the requirements of this condition are met as it applies to STP, Units 1 and 2.

10-24696-05 The relative differences in unirradiated Open.

strength (YS and UTS) between Optimized ZIRLO' and standard ZIRLO' in cladding Verified the CAPO. Commitment and structural analyses will be accounted for entered into CAPO as a regulatory until irradiation data for Optimized ZIRLO' commitment.

is accepted by the NRC staff. Analysis of Optimized ZIRLO' clad fuel rods will use The commitment to be incorporated the yield strength and ultimate tensile prior to loading fuel rods with strength as modified per Conditions a.a.i, Optimized ZIRLO' cladding.

a.a.H, and a.a.iii until such time that irradiation data for Optimized ZIRLO' strengths are collected and provided to the NRC.

Until the values are accepted by the NRC, STPNOC will confirm that the requirements of this condition are met as it applies to STP, Units 1 and 2.

-6 Condition Letter No. Subject Record No. Description of Commitment Implementation Status NOC-AE-11002661 Revision to the 11-5788-2* STPNOC will revise its License Amendment Closed on 4/28/2011.

4/412011 (ADAMS Facility Operating Request for approval of the Cyber Security Accession No. License and Plan (submitted to the NRC on 7/27/2010; The commitment was entered into the ML111090384) and Request for ADAMS Accession No. ML102150159) by CAPD as a regulatory commitment, but NOC-AE-11002688 Review and inserting the following words into section 2.1 incorrectly coded as not docketed.

6/28/2011 (ADAMS Approval of the of the Cyber Security Plan (CSP):

Accession No. Cyber Security Verified STPNOC letter dated ML11182A911) Plan "Within the scope of NRC's cyber security 4/28/2011 (ADAMS Accession No.

rule at Title 10 of the Code of Federal ML11123A217) incorporating the Regulations (10 CFR) 73.54, systems or commitment.

equipment that perform important to safety functions include structures, systems, and components (SSCs) in the balance of plant (BOP) that could directly or indirectly affect reactivity at a nuclear power plant and could result in an unplanned reactor shutdown or transient. Additionally, these SSCs are under the licensee's control and include electrical distribution equipment out to the first inter-tie with the offsite distribution system." "No later than December 31, 2012."

11-5788-3* Establish Cyber Security Assessment Team Closed on 7/11/2011.

(CSAT) as described in Section 3.1.2 "Cyber Security Assessment Team" of the CSP no The commitment was entered into the later than 12/31/2012. CAPD as a regulatory commitment.

Verified that STPNOC has already established the cyber security team roster.

11-5788-4* Identify Critical Systems (CSs) and Critical Closed on 7/1112011.

Digital Assets (CDAs) as described in Section 3.1.3 "Identification of Critical Digital The commitment was entered into the Assets" of the CSP no later than CAPD as a regulatory commitment.

12/31/2012. Verified STPNOC has already identified CSs and CDAs as described in Section 3.1.3 of the CSP. However, the detailed description of the CSs and CDAs was not reviewed, being a security-related document.

-7 Condition Letter No. Subject Record No.

Description of Commitment Implementation Status NOC-AE-11002661 Revision to the 11-5788-5* Implement Installation of a deterministic Open.

and Facility Operating one-way device between lower level devices NOC-AE-11002688 License and (level 2 and 3) and a firewall between higher The commitment was entered into the (continued) Request for level devices (level 3 and 4) as described in CAPD as a regulatory commitment in Review and Section 4.3, "Defense-In-Depth Protective accordance with Revision 5 of Approval of the Strategies" of the CSP. Procedure OPGP03-ZV-0002.

Cyber Security Plan Lower security level devices ([level 0, 1, 2 devices]) that bypass the deterministic device and connect to level 3 or 4 will be modified to prevent the digital connectivity to the higher level or will be modified to meet cyber security requirements commensurate with the level [3 or 4] devices to which they connect.

The design modifications that are not finished by the completion date will be documented in the site configuration management andlor change control program to assure completion of the design modification as soon as possible, but no later than the final implementation date (12/31/2012).

11-5788-6* The security control "Access Control For Open.

Portable And Mobile Devices" described in Appendix D 1.19 of NEI 08-09, Revision 6, The commitment was entered into the will be implemented no later than CAPD as a regulatory commitment in 12/31/2012. accordance with Revision 5 of Procedure OPGP03-ZV-0002.

11-5788-7* Implement observation and identification of Open.

obvious cyber related tampering to existing insider mitigation rounds by incorporating The commitment was entered into the the appropriate elements in Appendix E, CAPD as a regulatory commitment in Section 4.3 "Personnel Performing accordance with Revision 5 of Maintenance and Testing Activities" no later Procedure OPGP03-ZV-0002.

than 12/31/2012. ---_.- ---

-8 Condition Letter No. Subject Record No. ----

Description of Commitment Implementation Status NOC-AE-11002661 Revision to the 11-5788-8* Identify, document, and implement cyber Open.

and Facility Operating security controls in accordance with the NOC-AE-11002688 License and CSP Section 3.1.6 "Mitigation of The commitment was entered into the (continued) Request for Vulnerabilities and Application of Cyber CAPO as a regulatory commitment in Review and Security Controls" for COAs that could accordance with Revision 5 of Approval of the adversely impact the design function of Procedure OPGP03-ZV-0002.

Cyber Security physical security target set equipment.

Plan The implementation of controls that require a design modification that are not finished by the completion date will be documented in the site configuration management andlor change control program to assure completion of the design modification as soon as possible, but no later than the final implementation date (12/31/2012). ----

11-5788-9* Ongoing monitoring and assessment Open.

activities commence, as described in Section 4.4, "Ongoing Monitoring and The commitment was entered into the Assessment" of the CSP, for those target CAPO as a regulatory commitment in set COAs whose security controls have accordance with Revision 5 of been implemented no later than 12/31/2012. Procedure OPGP03-ZV-0002.

11-5788-10* Full implementation of STPNOC CSP for all Open.

safety, security, or emergency preparedness (SSEP) functions will be achieved by The commitment was entered into the 2128/2015. CAPO as a regulatory commitment in accordance with Revision 5 of Procedure OPGP03-ZV-0002.

" The Cyber Security Plan (CSP) amendment request was approved by the NRC staff by letter dated July 26, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML111920082). The NRC acknowledged that the licensee made these commitments as a part of the "Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule" for the approval of the CSP. However, the NRC staff's safety evaluation for the approval of the CSP stated that the key milestone dates and the final implementation date shall be in accordance with the implementation schedule submitted by the licensee. All subsequent changes to the NRC-approved implementation schedule will require prior NRC approval pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR),

Part 90. Hence, these regulatory commitments are not considered valid anymore and do not need to be tracked. STPNOC was aware of the NRC position and plans to close these commitments.

E. Halpin -2 If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-3016 or via e-mail at Balwant. Singal@nrc.gov.

Sincerely, IRAI Balwant K. Singal, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-498 and 50-499

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC LPLIV Reading RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl4 Resource RidsNrrPMSouth Texas Resource RidsNrrLAJBurkhardt Resource RidsOgcRp Resource RidsRgn4MailCenter Resource ADAMS Accession No. M L 112210658 OFFICE NRR/LPL4 NRR/LPL4/PM NRR/LPL4/LA NRR/LPL4/BC NAME RGrover BSingal JBurkhardt MMarkley BSingal DATE 8/23/11 8/23/11 8/17/11 9/7111 9/7/11 OFFICIAL RECORD COpy