ML18361A664

301 ADAMS2D Page 1 Exam Admin Items Normal Release

ML18361A664
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	07/24/2018
From:	NRC/RGN-II
To:	Florida Power & Light Co
References
Download: ML18361A664 (31)

Text

ML18361A664 ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: 5Qsr __..i Date of Examination: 1 7 Developed by: Written: Facility NRC II Operating Facility I1 NRC Target

. Chief Task Description (Reference) Examiners Date Initials

1. Examination administration date confirmed (Cia; C.2.ab). For NRC-prepared exams, 240 arrangements are made for the facility to submit reference materials (C.1 .e; C.3.c; Attachment 3). )l%3

-210 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.t).

3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c). As applicable, the facility

-210 contact submits to the NRC any prescreened K/As for elimination from the written examination outline, with_a_description_of the_facilitys_prescreening_process_(ES4O1,_D.1 .b).

-210 4. Reference material due for NRC-prepared exams (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3).

-210 5.

6.

Corporate notification letter sent fC.2.e).

NRC-developed written examination outline (ES-401-1/2 or ES-401N-i/2 and ES-401-3 or tr

-195 ES-401 N-3) sent to facility contact (must be on the exam security agreement) (C. i.ef: C.2.h:

C.3.d-e).

7. Operating test outline(s) and other checklists due, including Forms ES-201 -2, ES-201-3, ES-301 -1, 150 ES-301-2,_ES-301-5, and ES-D-1, as_applicable_(C.1.ef;_C.3.de).

8. Operating test outline(s) reviewed by the NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; 136 C.3.d-e).

9. Proposed examinations (written, JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable) and outlines (Forms ES-3d-i, ES-30i-2, ES-D-1, ES-401-i/2 or ES-401N-i/2, and ES-40i-3 or ES-401N-3);

-75 supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-30i-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, ES-40i-6, ES-401N-6, and any Form ES-201-2 and ES-201-3 updates); and reference materials due (C.1.eh; C.3.d).

10. Examinations prepared by the NRC are approved by the NRC supervisor and forwarded for facility licensee review (Cli: C.2.h; C.3.fg).

-60 11. Preliminary waiver/excusal requests due (C.1.m; C.2.c; ES-202).

-50 12. Written exam and operating test reviews completed (C.3.U.

13. Examination review results discussed between the NRC and facility licensee (Cli; C.i.kl; C.2.h;_C.3.g).__The NRC and the_facility_licensee conduct exam_preparatory_week.

14. Preliminary license applications and waiver/excusal requests, as applicable (NRC Form 398) due

-30 (C.1.m; C.2.i; ES-202).

15. Final license applications and waiver/excusal requests, as applicable (NRC Form 398), due and

-14 Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.m; C.2.k; ES-202).

-7 16. Written examinations and operating tests approved by the NRC supervisor (C.2.jk; C.3.h).

-7 17. Request facility licensee management feedback on the examination (C.2.l).

18. Final applications reviewed; one or two (if morethan 10) applications audited to confirm

-7 qualifications/eligibility; and examination approval and waiver/excusal letters sent (C.2.k; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.3.j; ES-204).

-7 19. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k).

-7 20. Approved scenarios and job performance measures distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i).

Target dates are based on facility-prepared examinations and the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter.

These dates are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

ES-201, Page 29 of 32

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: ST. LUCIE oP 15T I1N#L 41tT* - Date of Examination:12/4!201 7

. 4-l (I47L -t-rML Initials Item Task Description a b*

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropnate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES4O1 N. 1%) j )

W b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with R Section 0.1 of ES4OI or ES-401N and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.

c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. L) 3

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate. ijJ j

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5. verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component faiiures, technical specifications, and major tA)

S transients.

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u mix of appiicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule c without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the l,p] 3 A

T applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix 0 and in j,J Section D.5, Speciflc instructions for the Slmulator Operating Test, of ES-301 (including overlap).

3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -2:

(1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed W among the safety functions as specified on the form.

A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.

L (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s).

K (4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.

T (5) The number of altemate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologicaily controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form.

R o b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

u (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form. ..,

(2) At least one task is new or significantly modified.

H (3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations.

c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of ,,J -

applicants and ensure that no items are dupiicated on subsequent days.

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual J .

plant examination Insights) are coveted in the appropriate exam sections.

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 samplIng is appropriate. 3 t

c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

R d. Check for duplicatIon and overiap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams. (45 L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. ;J- 1

1. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). 3 j..

a. Author SEAN Yt 1117

b. Facility Reviewer C) 9cU 1crt- 117/ti

c. NRC Chief Examiner f#) A,. ni ,

U. NRC Supervisor r-t I .. O\k&.s- ILi)Zc.i7 Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.

1. The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column mc; the chief examiners concurrence is required

JAN 2 4 2018 10 CFR 55.5 10 CFR 55.40 L-2018--003 Mr. Eugene F. Guthrie Attn. Mr. Mark Bates U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 RE: St. Lucie Units 1 & 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Post NRC Examination Facility Activities - Examination Security Agreemertt 050000335/2017301 &05000389/2017301 Facility License Nos. DPR-67 and NFP-16 In accordance with Opera.tor Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, NUREG-1021, Revision 11, ES-501, Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) forwards NRC post exa+nination facility activities ES-201-3, Examinaf:ton Security Agreement for L-17-1.

Enclosed for review is ES-2,01-3, Exa1nination Security Agreement forms.

Questions or comments should be directed to Mr. Erik Feightner at (772) 467-7350 (office) or (352) 228-2908 (cell); or Mr. Brad Hinze at (772) 467-7771 (office) or (808) 342-3848 (cell).

Very truly yours, Dan DeBoer Site Director St. Lucie Plant DD/jlv Enclosure Florida Power & Light Company 6501 S. Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957

L-2018-003 Enclosure ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 (6 pages)

NEXTera~

ENERGY~

MASTER SECURITY AGREEMENT (Page 1 of 2)

-~-

The Master Security Agreement is used for those personnel having both knowledge of and unrestricted access to Exam Sensitive Material.

1. Pre-Examination (Review TR-AA-220-1002, Attachment 1 for pre-job briefing requirements)

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the PS L 2 O 17 f.J R (... IN l I JfJ L ~ XA-/V) examination scheduled for the date(s) of IZ [ '-1/17 - *11/,1/'"!is of the date of my signature. l agree that I will not.knowingly divulge any information about this examination to any persons who have not been authorized by the Exam Project Manager. I understand that I am not to instruct or provide performance feedback to those individuals scheduled to be administered this examination from this date until completion of examination administration. I also understand that l am not to evaluate individuals scheduled to be administered this examination from this date until the date of administration. Acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if I do not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback to an examinee. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examination and/or an enforcement action against my facility or me. I will immediately report to the Exam Project Manager any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

Furthermore, I agree to NOT discuss any aspects associated with the contents of this examination with ANY examinee until completion of their examination administration. I further understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examination and/or enforcement action against the facility licensee or me.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowle[/' I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the examination administered during the date(s) of ll/ '//17 - IZ. ? /1 7. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or prov1de performance feedback to those individuals who were administered this examination.

JOB TITLE/

PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE (1)

RESPONSIBILITY

1. ~EAN WYL.1 rX.Afl'\ fl \A 7HofZ

2. IERf<Y 15£1\JTo/\J Ft:ic.i (1tv Rep 1/1/1r ~

3. Juh fj 0"-l~ f\S ill};_t ~

4. 1L'/_/Ir it" .

J,~*~fer 1*m AvfOOc 5.

e. R1 c:...K 1\'11 N. LD.*J-TR-AA-220-1002-FOi , Revision 0 t ~-.::*.... ,o== <) vp-w.r*1dl.- I

,~ . .. . . . "" :::;:z:t:

........ f!ft¥

NEXTe ra

• MASTER SECURITY AGREEMENT ENERGY ~

/"

.,.,,.,,----=--

NUi;~

(Page 2 of 2)

JOB TITLE I PRINTED NAME DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

• ="-- RSf0N~BILITY

- ~n~W,g'{'S ~\vAx-1 1if~}7 fit 7.

8. ---

..JA#7R.S /l111lit.f ---"'

0 \~~"<" J(/.D J~v(To/l <dtJh_ J Z~

9. /f//efe ~t:tol4K S' 1/1'11 II/w Su,!) v' 6*.2../* jilJ_f_ ~

10. ~old ~(Jfb J tM clof/4Ja,,~ bva- 1-J-/tf

11. ~~ "\d~f>~ {)\ VV\ ~w ~- \--lt--\\

12. 1?1.1iss~c.L j 0 Pl-IN PEER 'Rt.V1£w~J,.e_ 1/J)Jx_ ~

13. tvlAfK Wt LSOt' Pff/t-. {ZEV / £We f2. - PTf'J o tv Ff L~

tt~l7 ~~

14.

15.

P2t?-Ao

~\\µ."'a.bub

\.\}l\Jlf-Zi:~~~\!~~,.~ ~'<~ 3

( ( 3/ ,f'

16. ])e.siru.- j' 81rel \<0.~oj~ ~;n ~ 1-1--1~

17. '£c~ 'BFtl~ i£fs1u<S !~Cf N\~.f\<?,~ ~ IZ- /zP/r=f

18. ~¥ :/o;t,,e_e,d/)/~D .5'!',t-1'tct-~.,,,/L Z-r c ffC"k ~ &/<!1 19.

-v 20 .

NOTES:

~ s16f"tO ofr- ft fl Ttc t /-P)(1 l\/t

~*5 sr 6 //bl 6FF f~I- &~e-(;e(//VI (_ /"';(J{ L TR-AA-220-1002-F01 , Revision 0

r\JEXTera* LIMITED SECURITY AGREEMENT ENERGY ~

~- (Page 1 of 2)

The Limited Security Agreement is used for those personnel having limited knowledge of, without unrestricted access to, Exam Sensitive MateriaL

1. Pre-Examination (Review TR-AA-220-1002, Attachment 1 for pre-job briefing requirements)

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized nowledge about the £5L zo /] N~ ~ /N JIf/! l f. XA-M examination scheduled for the date(s) of /2 / 1 -ti 11 rns of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about this examination to any persons who have not been authorized by the Exam Project Manager. I understand that I am not to instruct or provide performance feedback to those individuals scheduled to be administered this examination from this date until completion of examination administration. I also understand that I am not to evaluate individuals scheduled to be administered this examination from this date until the date of administration. Acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if I do not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback to an examinee. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examination and/or an enforcement action against my facility or me. I will immediately report to the Exam Project Manager any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised .

Furthermore, I agree to NOT discuss any aspects associated with the contents of this examination with ANY examinee until completion of their examination administration. I further understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examination and/or enforcement action against the facility licensee or me.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the examination administered during the date(s) of tz/y!t2- 11/11 /17 . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those individuals who were administered this examination.

JOB TITLE I PRINTED NAME SIGNA2(1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE RESPONSIBILITY

/£J..~S 1.

2.

JNIJ/('vV DfN IV ~.S A. pu; u.

f) alS .S 1.1J>£l.. 0s~.l RfAc'1oll Co!l.'t/1.t v PtllA1of\ .irl .it er/JJi;n 7/u/17 1/11/,z A

_./1.,1 ~

y-ri/z4n 11:

f7 /1 t ~

3. ,~j\fl\

'j Cf\Dck Ke.ru.ror ~~l Opf rcdcr ~~ ~n4L== 111 /rr ~

4.  !:'" K,,.rfo ~'f:-0 ~ ...:::::::::: 7/11/;7 ~l,.~ 1/ct ltt ~

5. J$ ~,~\tj Qo 4t<l-e -rl1r/17 ~ ~ 1i/iu/11 *' ~

6. a v(Y/f CJ~ Lve/ t/n,..J 5ipervlscr ~~?-~17 ..Av v

~ 1/J /ti' .. +

TR-AA-220-1002-F02 , Revision 0

NEXTera

• LIMITED SECURITY AGREEMENT ENERGY ~

~

_.....~~.

NUCLEAR (Page 2 of 2)

. "'~

JOB TITLE I PRINTED NAME RESPONSIBILITY IGNAT~ (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 7.

8. t~b~

~'-l'lb l. ~ \l~

.S~o 1

/,i/n

?-(Y17

~I ~

¥ A~ 111/tl' 1i/ii/11 Jt-¥ iF<I"

"*1~

~~. =/:~:'.--

R.E

• t2/to}17 sll..o g//f/17 ..A v~ 1 b /tr .::::l!::J:1.

11. ~ . l.e_ ( 1-Z1l-<1 Sfo ~~JftJ . /~~ 1h/tr ~

12. ~!Y2 h;') fVC\ v ,*I) RO 'i?-*.Jlf*.1 7 L1.cJ ~ 1 /y/1r -#

13. CkK t. ~ £& j.iF*I~ _L'l y~ 1/1/1t ~

14. 12.ee'Sc c. J?i : lc ~ ~RO ~1z.'!f7 ,4f,~ ti /21/0 '4'"*"'

15. JAME.S W1c_1..~f.'f_ SRO '1-18-11 ~ ~ J/Jlrf ~

16. 'l<os*e:..J' we.\ \ . lt..v' $ \2.0 "llzoln /'S~ 1h!tr ___:t 17.

18.

19.

5nsvr:.

-So'-'~

Ii~~

e11ARto~ (?,A!..-

"'T\ ~ ' '

...YLo

"::leo

~~ L LU~

"'/z7J7

~il7 l()\3\n

==z=-

~

~b~

1{2/rg 1/1>/;r 11 /2 rlo

_..fL_*

_-L

20. ~O~e,("" She..,-~c>cl L )ilo

~~ ~ ~ ~ 1/3/n ~-4'=

v NOTES: .

• ~ s u;,flfiJ off f t.tz. El.£ v-r ~ u,..;1 c f"'\A-f L

~ St GNW Off ,0c~ TE~C()N TR-AA-220-1002-F02, Revision 0

NEXTera- LIMITED SECURITY AGREEMENT ENERGY ~

~--. (Page 1 of 2)

. n=

The Limited Security Agreement is used for those personnel having limited knowledge of, without unrestricted access to, Exam Sensitive Material.

1. Pre-Examination (Review TR-AA-220-1002, Attachment 1 for pre-job briefing requirements)

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the P 5L 2 0 11 1-1 t< C IN/ 7 /fl L G Xl'f M examination scheduled for the date(s) of /2 / 'f / 17 - 1ilt1/r'f-S of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about this examination to any persons who have not been authorized by the Exam Project Manager. I understand that I am not to instruct or provide performance feedback to those individuals scheduled to be administered this examination from this date until completion of examination administration . I also understand that I am not to evaluate individuals scheduled to be administered this exam ination from this date until the date of administration. Acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if I do not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback to an examinee. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examination and/or an enforcement action against my facility or me. I will immediately report to the Exam Project Manager any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised .

Furthermore, I agree to NOT discuss any aspects associated with the contents of this examination with ANY examinee until completion of their examination administration. I further understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examination and/or enforcement action against the facility licensee or me.

2. Post-Examination To the best of ml knowledgi I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the examination administered during the date(s) of ti/I/ rz- ti /11 17 . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those individuals who were administered this examination .

JOB TITLE I PRINTED NAME DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE RESPONSIBILITY

1. 5 HA.,,;1'Jov J:"t1.v.:s{)\/" f<c.,,o //- {~)()(7 I

1-i/2r/o ~

2. /fAArr MctLHJ ~~ ,i:zfa 1i/z<J/17  ;((" XR Pr~ f)Q/7111) s R.o 12/z "J/t? ~

l pJ Gi~ 11/0/7 3.

4. 6RO 11!*~/n ./1.-v-~ 12/td/17 ~

5. - a<4"1 ~6~ ~\2..0 ~ 7 /117~ n h4n 1..1:..

6. 0,' Lt ~J(eT-- {(co ~ ks/r 7 /:11 ~ ti/)()/17 ~~

TR-AA-220-1002-F02 , Revision 0

NEx--:era* LIMITED SECURITY AGREEMENT EN~!lQY ~.... (Page 2 of 2)

_,..,.- NUCl.EAA JOB TITLE I PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE (1) DATE DATE NOTE RESPONSIBILITY 7.

8.

7Ft ~dfMM tA.ltsU!'t ~

ADM.

'F..~o

-r, ~ T(\ i'Y\q

,_J R/~* 11AL1/J7

/JhdL1 n/u}2 ~~

I/; l. /11' ~~

9.

yY/ llli; ~cl-Jt,tl)GC.,6R

10. I H.omA.:5

11. Curt* s s De.w f?S.HE~

..Z-..v1i°7~C. "fr;~

I t-1 .s TI< /IC-,OF?._

..C,.,-sfrvefor fl:

l( i;-/ c?,

12. E'eu::::. fiE..t<01t1NC/l

13. !)AYt'V> C?Luscd S*--PU2.1, ~

/rJST"f-uu-oe_

cJA-JJ.g_-J---

~~~--P~I '1!); __

14. R-c.V\..o\ ol Ll\\AVY '1-V\s :W-iAc.\v Y-- _,.-, 1i/1-D/tr__

15.

16.

Leonp.,,-J f>1@s./f~  ;;-n.shv'-./vv- ~ -b-"'---- I ¥?V 7 - -

17.

18.

19.

20.

NOTES:

~~ ~I toNl~ ofF ff.I- fl,f c-r.ea,..; /(;. l'V'I'-

TR-AA-220-1002-F02, Revision 0

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facllity:ST. LUCIE Date of Examination: 1214/2017 OperatIng Test Number:L-17-1

1. General Criteria Initials a b* c

a. The operating test conforms to the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with frJ sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

b. There Is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered vJ during this examination.

c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test(s) (see Section D.1.a.).

frJ tI yrt

.._J

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. iz.

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent ,J 4

.1 applicants at the designated license level.

2. Waikthrough Criteria -- 1I

a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

• initial conditions

• initiating cues

• references and tools, Including associated procedures

• reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the faculty licensee

• operationally important specific performance criteria that include detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observatIons to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walkthrough outlines (Forms ES-301-f and ES-301-2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last two NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with 12 ci Form ES-301 -4, and a copy is attached. J Printed Na s/Sign Date 111271(7

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

SEAN 1.fc vJYC-ie

// 4_ I, /ZIA i

c. NRC Chief Examinerf#) W\RASc-r,/ IV) 4T- u/iP3/17

d. NRCSupervisor j\

The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. The Independent NRC reviewer Initials items in column c; the chief examiner concurrence is required.

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301 4 Facility: St. Lucie Date of Exam:12!4117 Scenario Numbers: I Operating Test No.:L-17-1 initials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b* cH

1. The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or Instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

Li

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. Id

3. Each event description consists of the following:

. the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

. the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event

. the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

. the expected operator actions (by shift position)

. the event termination point (if applicable)

L,J (2,

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so Indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given.

7. The simulator modeling Is not altered. iZ7

8. The scenarios have been validated, Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaiuated to ensure that functional t.1 t fideiity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-3d. j V 10, All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable L

rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified _/

on Form ES-301 -5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when possible.

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew Dosition. L%..J Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes --

1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (12) 2 7

2. Abnormal events (24) 5 Li

3. Major transients (12) 2 t.J

4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (12) 2 aJ &

5. Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions 1 per scenario 1 set)

( L/ 7-

6. Preidentified critical tasks ( 2) 2 The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. An independent NRC reviewer initials items in column ce; chief examiner concurrence Is required.

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: St. Lucie Date of Exam:12/4/1 7 Scenario Numbers: 2 - Operating Test No.: L-1 7-1 lnlaIs QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b* c

1. The initial conditions ate realistic in that some equipment and/or Instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

b 12 I45

3. Each event description consists of the following:

. the point in the scenario when It is to be initiated 2)

. the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event

• the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

• the expected operator actions (by shift position)

. the event termination point (if applicable)

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. LI

5. Sequencing and timing of events Is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete 1/

evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so Indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. LA./

Cues are given.

7. The simulator modeling Is not altered, .A _,

8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. LA/ 1%

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the ) .

N

\[V form along with the simulator scenarios).  !-

1 1. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable 2) rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when possible.

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes

1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (12) 2 W

2. Abnormal events (24) 4

3. MaJor transients (12) 1 kI 7 y4

4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (12) 2

5. Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions (1 per scenario 1 (,/

6. Preldentified critical tasks ( 2) 2 The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. An independent NRC reviewer initials items in column c; chief examiner concurrence is required.

ES-30f Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: St Lucie Date of Exam: 12/4/17 Scenario Numbers: 3 Operating Test No.: L-17-1 Initials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b*

1. The initial conditions ate realistic in that some equipment and/or Instrumentation may be out of service, but It does not cue the operators into expected events. P

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. Id 127 \f4?

3. Each event description consists of the following:

. the point in the scenario when it Is to be initiated the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

.J  %

. the expected operator actions (by shift position)

. the event termination point (if applicable)

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. J 13 ci

5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so Indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given.

7. The simulator modeling is not altered. 17 IV

8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

9. Scenarios ate new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. 4]

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-3d-S (submit the fr 1.7 q3 form along with the simulator scenarios).

If. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable (j/ -Z rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). /

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preldentifled critical tasks across scenarios, when possible.

3, 43

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. V Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes

1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (12) 3

2. Abnormal events (2-4) 4

3. Major transients (12) 2 Si e

4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (12) 2

5. Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions (1 per scenario I

6. Preidentified critical tasks ( 2) 2 The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. An independent NRC reviewer Initials Items in column c; chief examiner concurrence is required.

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: St. Lucie Date of Exam: 12J4117 Scenario Numbers: 4 Operating Test No.: L-17-1 Initials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b* c

1. The initial conditions ate realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service but It does not cue the operators into expected events, t4)

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.  ? iV

3. Each event description consists of the following:

. the point in the scenario when it Is to be initiated

. the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event ..

. the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew I7 P

. the expected operator actions (by shift position)

. the event termination point (if applicable)

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. I/ j3

5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete *..-j evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. LI

6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. gj Z Cues are given.

7. The simulator modeling is not altered. &) v,

8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. 4/

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

cJ 2 t7

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable j rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

.,J %

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when t, 7 1 possible.

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. k/ .3 i4t Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes -- --

1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-.2) 3 yib

2. Abnormal events (2-4) 5 j,J

3. Major transients (12) 1 1

4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (12) 2 sI

5. Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions (? 1 per scenario set) 1 ) .

6. Preidentified critical tasks ( 2) 2 The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. An independent NRC reviewer initials items in column c; chief examiner concurrence is required.

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-30f-4 Facility: St. Lucle Date of Exam:1 2/4/17 Scenario Numbers: 5 Operating Test No.: C-i 7-i QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c

1. The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, J but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

3. Each event description consists of the following:

• the point in the scenario when It is to be initiated

• the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event t.J (2

. the symptomslcues that will be visible to the crew

. the expected operator actions (by shift position)

. the event termination point (if applicabte)

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. Ir.) 7 tv2

5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. vJ 1 Cues are given.

7. The simulator modeling is not altered.

8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

w 13

9. ScenarIos are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. L Q,

10. All Individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified L,,..J ,

on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). L7

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when possible.

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. fr.J I Target Quantitative AttrIbutes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes -- --

1. MalfunctionsafterEOPentry(i2) 1 k1

2. Abnormal events (24) 4

3. Major transients (12) 2

4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (12) 2

5. Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions (1 per scenario I set)

6. Preidentified critical tasks (. 2) 2 The facility licensee signature Is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. An Independent NRC reviewer initials items in column ca; chief examiner concurrence is required.

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301 -4 Facility: St. Lucle Date of Exam:12/4/17 Scenario Numbers: 6 Operating Test No.: L-17-1 Initials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b* c

1. The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment andtor instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

3. Each event description consists of the following:

. the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

. the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event U I/

• the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

. the expected operator actions (by shift position)

. the event termination point (If applicable)

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. $1

5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given.

7. The simulator modeling Is not altered. tJ W

8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional j) fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. t,.

10. All Individual operator compotencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the g/

form along with the simulator scenarios).

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) =

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified t-J on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentifred critical tasks across scenarios, when ) 2, yi?J possible.

14. The level of difficulty Is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. L V145 Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes --

1. MalfunctIons after EOP entry f 12) 2

2. Abnormal events (24) 5 4J 13, )j4

3. Major transients (12) 1 1

4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (12) 2 W yIif3

5. Entry Into a contingency EOP with substantive actions (I per scenario 1

, %I.. ,,,4 set)

6. Preidentified critical tasks ( 2) 2 i 3rn,, 14 The facility licensee signature Is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. An independent NRC reviewer initials items In column c; chief examiner concurrence Is required.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: St Lucie Date of Exam: 12/04/17 Operating Test No.: L-17-1 A E Scenarios P 1 100%LOCA 2 45%SGTR 3 100%SGTRIESD 4 100%TLOF 5 30%SBO 6Spare5XIO4ESD N CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T T 0 MINIMUM(*)

I C T S A B S A B S A B S A B S A B S A B T A y R 1 0 R T 0 R T 0 R 1 0 R T 0 R T 0 A___

N P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P L T E R I U RX 0 1 1 0 NOR 5 1 2 1 1 1 I/C 1,2,3, 2,3,4, 11 4 4 2 SRO Ui 4,7,9 6,9 MAJ 6,8 7,8 4 2 2 1 TS 1,4 3,5 4 0 2 2 RX 0 1 1 0 NOR 5 1 2 1 1 1 I/C 1,2,3, 2,3,4, 11 4 4 2 SRO U2 4,7,9 6,9 MAJ 6,8 7,8 4 2 2 1 TS 1,4 3,5 4 0 2 2 RJ( 0110 NOR 5 1 1 1 1 I/C 1,2,3, 6 4 4 2 SRO-U3 479 MAJ 6,8 2 2 2 1 TS 1,4 2 0 2 2

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Page 1 of 7

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301 -5 Facility: St Lucie Date of Exam: 12/04/17 Operating Test No.: L-17-1 A E Scenanos P 1 100% LOCA 2 45% SGTR 3 100% SGTRIESD 4 100% TLOF 5 30% SBO 6 Spare 5X10ESD N CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T T 0 MINIMUMf*)

i C -

S A B S A B S A B S A B S A B S A B T A y R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R 1 0 R T 0 A___

N P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P L T E R I U RX 0 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 2,34, 6 4 4 2 SROU4 I/C 69 MAJ 7,8 1 2 2 1 TS 3,5 3 0 2 2 RX s 1 1 1 0 NOR I 1 1 1 1 RO-1 I/C 2,3,4 3,6 5 4 4 2 MAJ 6,8 7,8 4 2 2 1 IS 0 0 RX 1 1 1 1 0 NOR 5 1 1 1 1 RO-2 I/C 1,7,9 2,4,9 6 4 4 2 MAJ 6,8 7,8 4 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2

- = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Page 2 of 7

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: St Lucie Date of Exam: 12/04/17 Operating lest No.: L-17-1 A E Scenarios P V 1 100% COCA 2 45%SGTR 3 100%SGTR/ESD 4 100%TLOF 5 30%SBO 6Spare5X10ESD N CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION I L

1 0 MINIMUM(*)

I C -

S A B S A B S A B S A B S A B S A B I A y R I 0 R 1 0 R 1 0 R T 0 R 1 0 R T 0 A___

N P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P L T E R I U RX s 1 1 1 0 NOR i 1 1 1 1 RO-3 I/C 2,3,4 3,6 5 4 4 2 MAJ 6,8 7,8 3 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1 0 NOR 5 1 1 1 1 RO-4 I/C 1,7,9 2,4,9 6 4 4 2 MAJ 6,8 7,8 4 2 2 1 TS 0 0 22 RX 5 1 1 1 0 NOR 4 1 2 1 1 1 1,6,9 RO-5 I/C 2,3,4 3,6 8 4 4 2 MAJ 7,8 6,8 7,8 6 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1 0 NOR 5 6 2 1 1 1 1,29, I/C RO-6 1,7,9 2,4,9 11 4 4 2 MA] 6,8 7 7,8 5 2 2 1 IS 0 0 2 2

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Page 3 of 7

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES4OI-5 Facility: St Lucie Date of Exam: 12/04/17 Operating Test No.: L-17-1 A E Scenarios D

1 100% LOCA 2 45% SGTR 3 100% SGTRIESD 4 100% TLOF 5 30% SBO 6 Spate 5X1O4ESD N CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T T 0 MINIMUM(*)

I C T S A B S A B S A B S A B S A B S A B T A y R 1 0 R T 0 R 1 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T o A____

N P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P L T E R I U RX 6 1 1 1 0 NOR 4 1 6 3 1 1 1 I/C 123 2,45,9 12,9, SRO-l1 15 4 4 2 MAJ 7,8 7 4 2 2 1 TS 1,3 2 0 2 2 RX 4 i 1 1 0 NOR 6 6 2 1 1 1 I/C 2,3,5 3,8 1,2,3,5, SRO-I2 8,9,10 12 4 4 2 MAJ 7,8 7 4 2 2 1 TS 24, 40 2 2 5

RX 6 6 2 1 1 0 NOR 4 1 2 1 1 1 I/C 1,6,9 2,3,4, 5,8 11 4 2 SRO-13 5,8,9 4 MA] 7,8 7 4 2 2 1 TS 2,3,5 2 3 0 2

=__=_= = = = = = = = =

Page 4 of 7

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301 -5 Facility: St Lucie Date of Exam: 12/04/17 Operating Test No.: L-17-1 A E Scenarios P 1 100% LOCA 2 45% SGTR 3 100% SGTRIESD 4 100% TLOF 5 30% SBO 6 Spare 5X10ESD N CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T T 0 MINIMUM(*)

I C S A B S A B S A B S A B S A B S A B T T

A y R T 0 R 1 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R 1 0 A___

N P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P L E R I U T

RX 6 1 1 1 0 NOR 4 1 6 3 1 1 1 259 I/C 1,2, 1,Z3,9, SRO-l4 15 4 4 2 7,8 7 4 2 2 1 MAJ TS 1,3 2 0 2 2 1 1 1 0 NOR 6 6 2 1 1 1 I/C 2,3,5 3,8 12,35, 8,9,10 12 4 4 2 SRO-I5 MAJ 7,8 7 7 4 2 2 1 15 2,3,4, 4 0 2 2 5

RJ( 6 6 2 1 1 0 NOR 4 1 2 1 1 1 I/C 1,6,9 5,8 11 4 4 2 SRO-I6 MAJ 7,8 7 7 4 2 2 1 TS 2,3,5 3 0 2 2

- = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Page 5 of 7

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: St Lude Date of Exam: 12/04/17 Operating lest No.: L-17-1 A E Scenarios P 1 100% LOCA 2 45% SGTR 3 100% SGTRIESD 4 100% TLOF 5 30% SBO 6 Spare 5X1O4ESD N CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T T 0 MINIMUM(*)

i C S A B S A B S A B S A B S A B S A B T T

A y R T 0 R 1 0 R T 0 R 1 0 R T 0 R T 0 A___

N P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P L T E R I U RX 6 11 1 0 NOR 4 1 1 1 1 I/C 12 4 2 SRO-17 5,8 8 4 MAJ 7,8 7 3 2 2 1 IS 1,3 2 0 2 2 4 1 1 1 0 NOR 6 1 1 1 1 I/C 2,3,5 1,235, 4 2 SRO-I8 8,9,10 10 4 MAJ 7,8 7 3 2 2 1 TS 2,3,4, 4 0 2 2 5

RX 5 0/1/0 1 1 0 NOR 5 5 1/0/1 1 1 1 SPARE I/C 1,2,3, 1,4,6, 2 3 9 6/ /3 4 4 2 RO/SRO 4,8,9 8 MAJ 7 7 7 1/1/1 2 2 1 IS 2,6 2/0/0 0 2 2

= = = - = = = = = = =- = = = = =

Page 6 of 7

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-l) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-l additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*)

Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional I/C malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

4. For new reactor facility licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-l applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

Page 7 of 7

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-3014 Facility: St. Lucie Date of Examination: 12/4/17 Operating Test No.: L-1 7-1 APPLICANTS RO Li SRO-I Li SRO-U Li Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1234561234561 23456 IntmrI t/Dwnt 1,2, 3,5, 2,3, 4,5, ALL ALL 2,3, 4,5, 1,2, 3,4, 1,2, 3,5, 2,3, 4,5, ALL ALL 2,3, 4,5, 1,2,3 4,8, 1,2, 2,3, ALL ALL 2,3, 1,2,3 3,5, 4,5, 4,5, 4,6, Events and Conditions 6,7, 6,7, 6,7, 6,7, 6,7, 6,7, 6,7, 7,8,9 6,7, 6,7, 6,7, 78,9 8,9 8,9 8,9 8,9 8,9 8,9 8,9 8,9 8,9 ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL Comply with and Use Procedures (1)

Onrf I Cnfr 0I 1,2, 1,2, 34 1,2, 34 ALL 1,2, 34 ALL 1,2, 34 1,2, 34 1,2, 34 ALL 1,2, ALL 34 Boards (2) 5,6, 6,7, 5,6, 6,7, 5,6. 6,7, 5,6, 6,7, 7,9 8,9, 8,9 8,9 7,9 8,9, 8,9 8,9 10 10 ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL Communicate and Interact Demonstrate ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL SupervisoryAbility(3)

Coml -J Mith rtd 1,3 2,3, 5

1,4 2,3, 4,5 3,5 2,6 1,3 2,3, 1,4 2,3, 3,5 2,6 5 4,5 Use TS (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes IS compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for evenj applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Forms ES 303 1 and ES 303 3 describe the competency rating factors.)

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-f Quality Checklist Facility: St. Lucie Date of Exam: 12/19/17 Exam Level: RO SRO Item Description Initials a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading

2. Proposed answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented (facility reviewer initials not required j Nfr t (N/R) if NO post-examination comments are submitted)

3. Applicants scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) LA) vs

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/-2% overall and 70% or 80%, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only exam) reviewed in ç detail

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified A 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of . ]/y?

questions missed by one-half or more of the applicants Date Printed Name/Signature

a. Grader SEA h/ //

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) M 4 45/l&

d. NRC Supervisor (*) z )cJz

(*) The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews ate requited.

Personally Identifiable Information Withheld Under 10 CFR 2.390 0FPL. OCT 03 201? L-2017-170 10 CFR 2.390 I\{r. Eugene Guthrie, Chief, 0B2 Attn. Mr. Mark Bates, Chief Examiner Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-8931 RE: St. Lucie Units 1 & 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-3 89 Reactor and Senior Reactor Operator Initial Examination Materials 75 Day Submittal In accordance with the requirements of NUREG-1 021, Revision 11, the proposed operating examination, supporting documents and reference material is due 75 days prior to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) examination date. St. Lucle Plant was granted an eight (8) day extension due to 1-lurricane Irma. St. Lucie Plant Reactor and Senior Reactor Operator (RO/SRO) initial examinations are scheduled December 4, 2017.

Specific items enclosed per these requirements are:

• ES-201-2, Examination Quality Checklist

• ES-20 1-3, Examination Security Agreement

• ES-301-1, Administrative Topics Outlines (RO) and (SRO)

• ES-301-2, Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outlines (RO) and (SRO)

• ES-301-3, Operating Test Quality Checklist

• ES-301-4, Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist

• ES-301-5, Transient and Event Checklist

• ES-301-6, Competencies Checklist

• ES-401-5, NRC Written Examination and Compact Discs (CDs)

• ES-401-6, Written Examination Quality Checklist

• ES-C-I, NRC Job Performance Measures and CDs

• ES-D-ls and ES-D-2s, NRC Simulator Scenarios and CDs

• ES-201, Attachment 3, Reference Materials for Initial Licensing Examinations Questions or comments should be directed to Mr. Richard Virgin at (772) 467-7380 (office) or (352) 302-1816 (cell); or Mr. Erik Feightner at (352) 228-2908 (cell).

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 and NUREG-1021 (Revision 11) information must be withheld from public disclosure until after the examinations are complete.

Florida Power & Light Company 6501 S. Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957

L-201 7-170 Page 2 of 2 Very truly yours, Dan DeBoer Site Director St. Lucie Plant DD/jlv Enclosures cc: Chief Operations Branch, Division of Reactor Safety, Region II, w/o enclosures Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC, w/o enclosures Document Control Desk, USNRC, Washington, DC, w/o enclosures Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, St. Lucie Nuc1eai Plant, w/o enclosures

0PPL JUt 052017 10 CFR 2.390 Mr. Eugene Guthrie R-II/DRS/0B2 L-20 17-125 Attn. Mr. Mark Bates, Chief Examiner Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-893 1 RE: St. Lucie Units I & 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Initial Operator Operating Examinations Outline Submittal In accordance with the requirements of NUREG-1021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, Revision 11, florida Power and Light (FPL) is submitting herein the following initial license examination checklists and outlines for the St. Lucie Plant Reactor and Senior Reactor Operator (RO/SRO) initial examinations scheduled for December 2017.

Specific items enclosed per these requirements are:

• ES-201-2, Examination Outline Quality Checklist

• ES-201-3, Examination Security Agreement (copy)

• ES-301-1, Admitilstradve Topics Outline

• ES-301-2, Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline

• ES-301-5, Transient and Event Checklist

• ES-D-1, Scenario Outlines (six)

Questions or comments should be directed to Mr. Richard Virgin at (772) 467-7380 (office) or (352) 302-1816 (cell); or Mr. Erik Feightner at (352) 228-2908 (cell).

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 and NUREG-1021 (Revision 11, ES-201) information must be withheld from public disclosure until after the examinations are complete.

Florida Power & Light Company 6501 S. Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957

L-2017-125 Page 2 of 2 Very truly yours, 6

Daniel DeBoer Site Director St. Lode Plant DD/jlv Enclosures cc: Chief, Operations Branch, Division of Reactor Safety, Region II, w/o enclosure Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC, w/o enclosure Document Control Desk, USNRC, Washington, DC, w/o enclosure Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, St. Lucie Nuclear Plant, w/o enclosure

Personally IdenUfiable Information Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390 FPL NOV 0 2 201?

L-20i 7-194 10CfR55.31 10 CFR 2.390 Regional Administrator, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. Eugene F. Guthrie, Chief Operations Branch 2 Director of Reactor Safety Attn: Mr. Mark Bates Adanta, G.A 30303 Re: St. Lucie Units I and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Preliminary License Applications Licensed Operator Examination December 2017 Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.31, Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) requests that operator license tests be administered to the applicants listed on page 2 of this letter. Enclosed for your preliminary review is one unsigned copy of the License Application (NRC Form 398) and an unsigned copy of the Medical Certification (NRC lorm 396) for etch applicant.

There are three applicants that are waiting on follow-up information from theft personal physician/specialist at the time of pre-submittal. Resolution of the medical dcterinination is expected to be completed by the required final submittal of license application date.

The enclosures to this letter contain medical and personal information, the disclosure of which would clearly constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal PY Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390(a) (6), we request that tic enclosures be withheld from public disclosure. Should you require additional information, please contact Mr. Erik Feightner at (772) 467-7350.

Very truly yours, 6 J%

Daniel DeBoer Site Director St. Lucie Plant DD/jlv Enclosures Florida Power & Light Company 6501 S. Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957