|
|
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| | number = ML17309A010 | | | number = ML17309A010 |
| | issue date = 03/01/2017 | | | issue date = 03/01/2017 |
| | title = 2017/03/01 Seabrook La - [External_Sender] the NRC Acceptance of the Sla | | | title = La - (External_Sender) the NRC Acceptance of the Sla |
| | author name = | | | author name = |
| | author affiliation = - No Known Affiliation | | | author affiliation = - No Known Affiliation |
| Line 16: |
Line 16: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:1 SeabrookLANPEm Resource From:Deborah Grinnell <grinnelldebbie2@gmail.com> | | {{#Wiki_filter:SeabrookLANPEm Resource From: Deborah Grinnell <grinnelldebbie2@gmail.com> |
| Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 10:14 AM To: Buford, Angela | | Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 10:14 AM To: Buford, Angela |
|
| |
|
| ==Subject:== | | ==Subject:== |
| [External_Sender] The NRC acceptance of the SLA Angela, NextEra has not answered the questions you asked. in research The NRC still can not state Seabrook is operating with ASR under their license and never will be able to operate safely under their UFSAR and current license. NextEra's SLA has not addressed how they will monitor ASR in the complexity required ( which is a guess) nor have they been reliable in monitoring ASR at Seabrook in all the NRC documentation. Since 2011 without the NRC inspector's violations or NRC RAI's to push them to learn and you learn and understand the requirements to monitor or even monitor under NRC pressure to corrective actions or violations or rewriting their responses to the NRC RAI. Will they?? NO. The NRC studies are not complete or peer reviewed, right?? | | [External_Sender] The NRC acceptance of the SLA |
| BUT you know you needed the NIST study done a nd peer reviewed in a gold standard. | | : Angela, NextEra has not answered the questions you asked. in research The NRC still can not state Seabrook is operating with ASR under their license and never will be able to operate safely under their UFSAR and current license. NextEras SLA has not addressed how they will monitor ASR in the complexity required ( which is a guess) nor have they been reliable in monitoring ASR at Seabrook in all the NRC documentation. Since 2011 without the NRC inspectors violations or NRC RAIs to push them to learn and you learn and understand the requirements to monitor or even monitor under NRC pressure to corrective actions or violations or rewriting their responses to the NRC RAI. Will they?? NO. The NRC studies are not complete or peer reviewed, right?? |
| | BUT you know you needed the NIST study done and peer reviewed in a gold standard. |
| | I can not believe the NRC accepted NextEra license amendment. Did you accept the SLA ?? Did the NRC research division accept the SLA?? Did anyone? How? |
| | Is the decision based on on basis.you dont have an ASR basis to accept it. The operative determination is singularly based on a single day..ASR at Seabrook will collapseand to continue to operate the plant you will only continue to report SEABROOKs ASR until the one report about a collapse. Hopefully it will not be at a ground level radiation release and the public radiation health exposure lot of people are at riskisnt that your job to protect usor is it to primarily to release the plant?? I has been proven, hasnt it?? Lawyers can not morally cover your responsibly, can they? |
| | Debbie 1 |
|
| |
|
| I can not believe the NRC accepted NextEr'a license amendment. Did you accept the SLA ?? Did the NRC research division accept the SLA?? Did anyone? How?
| | Hearing Identifier: Seabrook_LA_NonPublic Email Number: 367 Mail Envelope Properties (6B2B4F8A-0606-4214-8A35-2EC0E5476336) |
| | |
| Is the decision based on on basis-.you don't have an ASR basis to accept it. The operative determination is singularly based on a single day-..ASR at Seabrook will collapse-and to continue to operate the plant you will only continue to report SEABROOK' s ASR until the one report about a coll apse. Hopefully it will not be at a ground level radiation release and th e public radiation health exposure
| |
| | |
| lot of people are at risk-isn't that your job to protect us-or is it to primarily to release the plant?? I has been proven, hasn't it?? Lawyers can not mora lly cover your responsibly, can they?
| |
| | |
| Debbie Hearing Identifier: Seabrook_LA_NonPublic Email Number: 367 Mail Envelope Properties (6B2B4F8A-0606-4214-8A35-2EC0E5476336)
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Subject:== | | ==Subject:== |
| [External_Sender] The NRC acceptance of the SLA Sent Date: 3/1/2017 10:14:14 AM Received Date: 3/1/2017 10:14:18 AM From: Deborah Grinnell Created By: grinnelldebbie2@gmail.com Recipients: "Buford, Angela" <Angela.Buford@nrc.gov> | | [External_Sender] The NRC acceptance of the SLA Sent Date: 3/1/2017 10:14:14 AM Received Date: 3/1/2017 10:14:18 AM From: Deborah Grinnell Created By: grinnelldebbie2@gmail.com Recipients: |
| Tracking Status: None | | "Buford, Angela" <Angela.Buford@nrc.gov> |
| | | Tracking Status: None Post Office: gmail.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1608 3/1/2017 10:14:18 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: |
| Post Office: gmail.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1608 3/1/2017 10:14:18 AM | | Recipients Received:}} |
| | |
| Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:}} | |
|
|---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML23173A1522023-06-22022 June 2023
Request for Additional Information NextEra Fleet Emergency Plan Amendment Request
ML23156A3042023-05-31031 May 2023
Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Remove Period of Applicability from Pressure Temperature Limits and Low Temperature Over Pressure Protection Curves
ML23109A1862023-04-19019 April 2023
and Turkey Point Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Proposed Alternative to Asme Section XI Authorizing Implementation of Asme Code Case N-752-1
ML23066A1892023-03-0303 March 2023
OEDO-22-00419: Email Dated 3-3-2023 to Petitioner on Seabrook ASR Petition
ML23066A0892023-02-24024 February 2023
OEDO-22-00419 - Email Dated 02/24/2023 to Petitioner on Seabrook Unit 1 ASR Petition
ML23020A9392023-01-19019 January 2023
Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Revise Cooling Tower Service Water Loop or Cell Requirements (EPID L-2022-LLA-0183) (Email)
ML23011A3082023-01-11011 January 2023
Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request 4RA-22-001 (L-2022-LLR-0074)
ML22341A0012022-12-0606 December 2022
Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Relief Request 4RA-22-001, Proposed Alternative in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(2)
ML22333A7452022-11-22022 November 2022
OEDO-22-00419 - Email: C-10 Response on PRB Initial Assessment - C-10 Petition on Seabrook ASR Concrete Degradation
ML22287A1472022-10-13013 October 2022
2.026 Petition Screen-in Email
ML22228A0552022-08-15015 August 2022
Request for Additional Information Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report Review
ML22200A1082022-07-19019 July 2022
Acceptance Review for TSTF-577 Amendment
ML22153A4152022-05-31031 May 2022
Request for Additional Information Re 120V Inverter LAR from TS Branch - Final
ML22116A2442022-04-26026 April 2022
Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Relief Request 3IR-18 and 3IR-19 for End of Third 10-Year ISI Interval for Examinations with Limited Coverage
ML22048B5522022-02-17017 February 2022
LTR-22-0010 Reply to Geoff Gilbert Email Concern About Seabrook Station Concrete Degradation
ML22062B6642022-02-0707 February 2022
Request for Additional Information 120V Inverter LAR from the Electrical Branch
ML22063A0002022-01-25025 January 2022
Requests for Additional Information from Risk Branch Regarding 120V Inverter LAR
ML22020A2542022-01-20020 January 2022
LTR-22-0010 Geoff Gilbert, E-mail Concern About Seabrook Station Concrete Degradation
ML21097A2512021-04-0707 April 2021
Request for Additional Information Regarding Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report Review for RFO 20 (EPID L-2020-LRO-0066) (Email)
ML21054A0482021-02-23023 February 2021
Request for Additional Information Regarding Heat Flux Hot Channel Requirement Amendment Request
ML20343A0942020-12-0303 December 2020
Request for Additional Information Regarding Seabrook (COVID-19) Part 73 Force-on-Force Exemption Request (L-2020-LLE-0219)
ML20273A2812020-09-22022 September 2020
Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action License Amendment Request to Resolve Non-Conservative Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor Requiments
ML20258A1502020-09-14014 September 2020
Request for Additional Information Related to Seabrook License Amendment Request Regarding One-Time Change to the AC Sources Operating TS
ML20260H4932020-09-11011 September 2020
NRR E-mail Capture - Comanche Peak - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action - Request to Use Later Code Edition of ASME OM Code
ML20230A2962020-08-14014 August 2020
Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action License Amendment Request to Allow a One-Time Change to the AC Sources Operating TS
ML20167A1842020-06-11011 June 2020
Request for Additional Information Related to Seabrook License Amendment Request Regarding TSTF-411 and TSTF-418 (L-2019-LLA-0237)
ML20124A0012020-05-0101 May 2020
Cancellation of Call with Seabrook on Steam Generator Tube Inspections
ML20114E1592020-04-23023 April 2020
Email and Request for Additional Information Related to Seabrook License Amendment Request to Degraded Voltage Time Delay Setpoint (L-2020-LLA-0012)
ML20101N0932020-04-10010 April 2020
Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Re Relief Request to Defer ASME Inspections Due COVID-19 (EPIDs L-2020-LLR-0055, -56, and -57)
ML20101L0402020-04-10010 April 2020
Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Relief Request to Use Code Case OMN-13 with 2012 Edition of the OM Code
ML20101H3912020-04-0808 April 2020
Verbal Authorization for Seabrook Relief Request 3IIR-7
ML20087K8262020-03-27027 March 2020
Upcoming Steam Generator Tube Inservice Inspection
ML20063J9792020-02-28028 February 2020
Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Revise Degraded Voltage Time Delay Setpoint
ML19347C6732019-12-13013 December 2019
Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-418
ML19296D9122019-10-23023 October 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information Related to Seabrook Inverter Amendment (L-2019-LLA-0216)
ML19295F5422019-10-15015 October 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Revise Onsite Power Distribution Requirements
ML19275G7832019-10-0101 October 2019
Limited Appearance Statement from New Hampshire State Representative, Robert Harb Regarding the Seabrook Station Unit 1 License Amendment Application
ML19270E6512019-09-27027 September 2019
Limited Appearance Statement from Joanna Hammond Regarding the Seabrook Station Unit 1 License Amendment Application
ML19270E6542019-09-26026 September 2019
Limited Appearance Statement from Brian Campbell Regarding the Seabrook Station Unit 1 License Amendment Application
ML19196A3592019-07-15015 July 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Revise the Emergency Core Cooling System Accumulator Technical Specifications
ML19169A2412019-06-13013 June 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Relief Requests for the Containment Building Spray Pump Flow and Vibration Testing (Epids L-2019-LLR-00 and L-2019-LLR-00)
ML19162A0662019-06-0404 June 2019
Reply to Mr. Rick Jakious'S E-mail of 5-29-2019 to Stephen B. Comley Sr., We the People with Attachments
ML19112A1782019-04-22022 April 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - Point Beach; Seabrook; Turkey Point - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-563
ML19101A4042019-04-11011 April 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - Point Beach; Seabrook; St. Lucie; Turkey Point - Acceptance of Licensing Action Relief Request to Use Encoded Phased Array Ultrasonic Examination Techniques for Ferritic and Austenitic Welds
ML19070A2382019-03-10010 March 2019
LTR-19-0088 Maura Healey, Attorney General, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Ltr NextEras Requests for a License Amendment and Twenty-year Extension Prior to Issuance of a Final Decision in Adjudicatory Hearing on Concrete Degradation at
ML19056A4522019-02-25025 February 2019
Comment from Philip Hurzeler Regarding the Emergency Petition Filed by C-10 on February 13, 2019
ML19056A4582019-02-25025 February 2019
Comment from Deborah A. Jones Regarding the Emergency Petition Filed by C-10 on February 13, 2019
ML19056A4602019-02-25025 February 2019
Comment from Lisa Conti Regarding the Emergency Petition Filed by C-10 on February 13, 2019
ML19050A2212019-02-19019 February 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Relief Request Proposed Alternative 3IR-17 Implementation of an Extended Reactor Vessel Inservice Inspection Interval
ML19050A3202019-02-13013 February 2019
Package from Stephen B. Comley, Sr. at February 13, 2019 Seabrook Station, Unit 1, Public Meeting
2023-06-22
[Table view] |
Text
SeabrookLANPEm Resource From: Deborah Grinnell <grinnelldebbie2@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 10:14 AM To: Buford, Angela
Subject:
[External_Sender] The NRC acceptance of the SLA
- Angela, NextEra has not answered the questions you asked. in research The NRC still can not state Seabrook is operating with ASR under their license and never will be able to operate safely under their UFSAR and current license. NextEras SLA has not addressed how they will monitor ASR in the complexity required ( which is a guess) nor have they been reliable in monitoring ASR at Seabrook in all the NRC documentation. Since 2011 without the NRC inspectors violations or NRC RAIs to push them to learn and you learn and understand the requirements to monitor or even monitor under NRC pressure to corrective actions or violations or rewriting their responses to the NRC RAI. Will they?? NO. The NRC studies are not complete or peer reviewed, right??
BUT you know you needed the NIST study done and peer reviewed in a gold standard.
I can not believe the NRC accepted NextEra license amendment. Did you accept the SLA ?? Did the NRC research division accept the SLA?? Did anyone? How?
Is the decision based on on basis.you dont have an ASR basis to accept it. The operative determination is singularly based on a single day..ASR at Seabrook will collapseand to continue to operate the plant you will only continue to report SEABROOKs ASR until the one report about a collapse. Hopefully it will not be at a ground level radiation release and the public radiation health exposure lot of people are at riskisnt that your job to protect usor is it to primarily to release the plant?? I has been proven, hasnt it?? Lawyers can not morally cover your responsibly, can they?
Debbie 1
Hearing Identifier: Seabrook_LA_NonPublic Email Number: 367 Mail Envelope Properties (6B2B4F8A-0606-4214-8A35-2EC0E5476336)
Subject:
[External_Sender] The NRC acceptance of the SLA Sent Date: 3/1/2017 10:14:14 AM Received Date: 3/1/2017 10:14:18 AM From: Deborah Grinnell Created By: grinnelldebbie2@gmail.com Recipients:
"Buford, Angela" <Angela.Buford@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: gmail.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1608 3/1/2017 10:14:18 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:
