Information Notice 2003-01, Failure of a Boiling Water Reactor Target Rock Main Steam Safety/Relief Valve: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 01/15/2003
| issue date = 01/15/2003
| title = Failure of a Boiling Water Reactor Target Rock Main Steam Safety/Relief Valve
| title = Failure of a Boiling Water Reactor Target Rock Main Steam Safety/Relief Valve
| author name = Beckner W D
| author name = Beckner W
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DRIP/RORP
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DRIP/RORP
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 14: Line 14:
| document type = NRC Information Notice
| document type = NRC Information Notice
| page count = 8
| page count = 8
| revision = 0
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
[[Issue date::January 15, 2003]]


NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2003-01:FAILURE OF A BOILING WATER REACTORTARGET ROCK MAIN STEAM SAFETY/RELIEF VALVE
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
 
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
 
WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 January 15, 2003 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2003-01:               FAILURE OF A BOILING WATER REACTOR
 
TARGET ROCK MAIN STEAM SAFETY/RELIEF
 
VALVE


==Addressees==
==Addressees==
All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for nuclear power reactors, exceptthose that have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor.
All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for nuclear power reactors, except
 
those that have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been
 
permanently removed from the reactor.


==Purpose==
==Purpose==
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alertaddressees to a recent failure of a main steam safety/relief valve on a boiling water reactor (BWR). The NRC anticipates that recipients will review the information for applicability to their facilities and consider taking appropriate action However, suggestions contained in this information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alert
 
addressees to a recent failure of a main steam safety/relief valve on a boiling water reactor
 
(BWR). The NRC anticipates that recipients will review the information for applicability to their
 
facilities and consider taking appropriate actions. However, suggestions contained in this
 
information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response
 
is required.


==Description of Circumstances==
==Description of Circumstances==
In April 2002, following a Unit 1 refueling outage at the Hatch Nuclear Plant, the safety/reliefvalve (S/RV) in the 1J location began leakin In an effort to stop the assumed pilot valve leakage, the licensee cycled the S/RV at rated pressure and temperatur The valve failed to fully open and then failed to resea The licensee continued the startup to allow identification of potential balance-of-plant leakag During the balance-of-plant startup, the associated S/RVvacuum breaker failed due to repeated cycling, resulting in high unidentified drywell leakage. The plant was shut down when the leakage exceeded the technical specification allowableleakage (reference LER 50-321/2002-002). The S/RVs installed in Unit 1 are Target Rock two-stage S/RV The main stage valve internals(shown in attached Figure 1) are assembled by screwing the main piston onto the main stem so that the piston moves inside the guide, installing a locking tab washer, and installing the stem nut against the washer's locking ta The piston is torqued to 100 ft-lbs, the stem nut is torqued to 50 ft-lbs, and the locking tab is bent to capture the stem nu During the S/RV inspection after the April 2002 shutdown, the failed valve was found to have a .003-inch clearance between the main disc and its sea When the valve was disassembled, the stem nut and the piston were found to be loos The stem nut was removed by hand and the piston was alsounthreaded by hand from the ste However, the threads on the stem were severely damage The piston was unthreaded by working it up to the good threads under the stem nut and threading it onto this portion of the ste The inside of the guide was heavily grooved and was also worn by the piston edge wearing on the guid The piston was visibly cocked on the valve ste In an earlier event in 1999, the licensee had a different S/RV fail on the test stan This failureoccurred during the fourth valve actuation when the stem nut fell off the stem and jammed in the preload spring coil The resulting uneven force caused the piston to cock in the guid The stem nut had lost torque and came unscrewed from the stem threads in spite of the locking ta Following this failure, the licensee instituted a program to check the torque on both the stem nut and the pisto The licensee found in most cases, both the stem nut and the piston had lost torque.Following the failure of the 1J S/RV, the licensee closely examined three valves which had beenremoved during the April 2002 refueling outag The stem nuts and pistons of all three valves had lost torque, the stems of two of the valves showed significant wear on the valve threads, and one valve exhibited some thread wea All three valves showed signs of damage on the stem shoulder, which is designed to contact the pisto In October 2002, the licensee removed three additional S/RVs from Unit 1 for testing, disassembly, and inspectio All three valves successfully stroked with steam pressure but when disassembled and inspected, were found to have lost torque on both the stem nut and the pisto Two valves had fairly good threads and the final valve (1F) had significant thread damage and a visibly cocked pisto All three valve stems showed varying degrees of damage in the shoulder area.The licensee believes the loss of torque and damage of the valve internals can be attributed tothe manufacturing tolerances of the valve stem and piston and to the lengthy service time without adequate inspection and maintenanc The valve is designed so the valve stem screws into the pisto The stem has a shoulder that seats against the piston shoulde For the valves that show little to no thread damage, the stem apparently seats properly against the piston and most of the valve actuation force is carried by the stem and piston shoulder For the valves with thread damage, the licensee believes that the end of the lead thread of the piston contacts the fillet that is machined into the shoulder of the valve ste As shown in Figure 1, when this occurs, the shoulder of the stem does not properly seat against the shoulder of the piston.
In April 2002, following a Unit 1 refueling outage at the Hatch Nuclear Plant, the safety/relief
 
valve (S/RV) in the 1J location began leaking. In an effort to stop the assumed pilot valve
 
leakage, the licensee cycled the S/RV at rated pressure and temperature. The valve failed to
 
fully open and then failed to reseat. The licensee continued the startup to allow identification of
 
potential balance-of-plant leakage. During the balance-of-plant startup, the associated S/RV
 
vacuum breaker failed due to repeated cycling, resulting in high unidentified drywell leakage.
 
The plant was shut down when the leakage exceeded the technical specification allowable
 
leakage (reference LER 50-321/2002-002).
 
The S/RVs installed in Unit 1 are Target Rock two-stage S/RVs. The main stage valve internals
 
(shown in attached Figure 1) are assembled by screwing the main piston onto the main stem so
 
that the piston moves inside the guide, installing a locking tab washer, and installing the stem
 
nut against the washers locking tab. The piston is torqued to 100 ft-lbs, the stem nut is torqued
 
to 50 ft-lbs, and the locking tab is bent to capture the stem nut. During the S/RV inspection
 
after the April 2002 shutdown, the failed valve was found to have a .003-inch clearance
 
between the main disc and its seat. When the valve was disassembled, the stem nut and the
 
piston were found to be loose. The stem nut was removed by hand and the piston was also
 
unthreaded by hand from the stem. However, the threads on the stem were severely damaged.
 
The piston was unthreaded by working it up to the good threads under the stem nut and
 
threading it onto this portion of the stem. The inside of the guide was heavily grooved and was
 
also worn by the piston edge wearing on the guide. The piston was visibly cocked on the valve
 
stem.
 
In an earlier event in 1999, the licensee had a different S/RV fail on the test stand. This failure
 
occurred during the fourth valve actuation when the stem nut fell off the stem and jammed in
 
the preload spring coils. The resulting uneven force caused the piston to cock in the guide.
 
The stem nut had lost torque and came unscrewed from the stem threads in spite of the locking
 
tab. Following this failure, the licensee instituted a program to check the torque on both the
 
stem nut and the piston. The licensee found in most cases, both the stem nut and the piston
 
had lost torque.
 
Following the failure of the 1J S/RV, the licensee closely examined three valves which had been
 
removed during the April 2002 refueling outage. The stem nuts and pistons of all three valves
 
had lost torque, the stems of two of the valves showed significant wear on the valve threads, and one valve exhibited some thread wear. All three valves showed signs of damage on the
 
stem shoulder, which is designed to contact the piston. In October 2002, the licensee removed
 
three additional S/RVs from Unit 1 for testing, disassembly, and inspection. All three valves
 
successfully stroked with steam pressure but when disassembled and inspected, were found to
 
have lost torque on both the stem nut and the piston. Two valves had fairly good threads and
 
the final valve (1F) had significant thread damage and a visibly cocked piston. All three valve
 
stems showed varying degrees of damage in the shoulder area.
 
The licensee believes the loss of torque and damage of the valve internals can be attributed to
 
the manufacturing tolerances of the valve stem and piston and to the lengthy service time
 
without adequate inspection and maintenance. The valve is designed so the valve stem screws
 
into the piston. The stem has a shoulder that seats against the piston shoulder. For the valves
 
that show little to no thread damage, the stem apparently seats properly against the piston and
 
most of the valve actuation force is carried by the stem and piston shoulders. For the valves
 
with thread damage, the licensee believes that the end of the lead thread of the piston contacts
 
the fillet that is machined into the shoulder of the valve stem. As shown in Figure 1, when this
 
occurs, the shoulder of the stem does not properly seat against the shoulder of the piston.
 
Thread damage starts with the first actuation on the test stand, resulting in a loss of torque.
 
Over time, vibration from normal plant operations causes fretting and wear of the valve stem
 
shoulder and threads. The piston rocks in the guide and wears grooves where the piston rings
 
contact the guide. Eventually the piston could significantly cock on the stem and wedge in the
 
guide during valve actuation, which would prevent proper opening or closing of the valve. The
 
licensee has not been able to determine the time in operation required to damage a valve to the
 
point of failure. The licensee believes the failed 1J valve and the damaged 1F valve were in
 
service for approximately 20 years without maintenance. The licensee is currently removing
 
several S/RVs during each plant outage to ensure that all installed S/RVs are inspected and
 
maintained at least every 6 years. There are 11 S/RVs installed in each unit. Discussion
 
As the result of the 1J valve failure, the licensee performed a root cause analysis following the
 
event and contracted an independent engineering firm to perform a separate root cause
 
analysis. The licensee believes that the failure of the S/RV is related to the manufacturing
 
tolerances of the valve stem and piston assembly and to the lengthy service time without
 
adequate inspection and maintenance. The independent root cause analysis determined that
 
the lead thread of the piston was contacting the fillet of the shoulder, preventing shoulder-to- shoulder contact. Since the piston was not adequately attached to the stem, operational
 
vibration and valve actuation caused thread damage and eventual valve failure. The valve
 
vendor (Curtiss Wright Flow Control Corporation) has developed changes to the inspection and
 
refurbishment procedures to ensure proper shoulder-to-shoulder contact during valve
 
assembly. The BWR vendor (GE Nuclear Energy) is issuing a Service Information Letter (SIL)
to address the degradation found in the Hatch S/RVs.
 
The above-described circumstances emphasize the importance of periodic inspection of S/RV
 
main stage components to identify deficiencies and necessary corrective actions. All Target
 
Rock two-stage and three-stage S/RVs have similarly designed main stage components.
 
Currently 11 BWR plants in the U.S. have two-stage S/RVs, and 11 BWR plants have three- stage S/RVs.
 
The above described problems found in the main stages of Target Rock S/RVs are not related
 
to the problems found previously in the pilot stages of the S/RVs that were discussed in
 
Regulatory Issue Summary 2000-12, Resolution of Generic Safety Issue B-55.
 
This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any
 
questions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts
 
listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
 
/RA/
                                                William D. Beckner, Program Director
 
Operating Reactor Improvements Program
 
Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs
 
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
 
Technical Contacts:    Norman Garrett, Region II              Charles G. Hammer, NRR
 
(912) 367-9881                        (301) 415-2791 Email: nxg@nrc.gov                    Email: cgh@nrc.gov
 
Danny Billings, NRR
 
(301) 415-1175 Email: deb1@nrc.gov
 
Attachments: 1. Figure 1 - Target Rock Safety/Relief Valve
 
2. List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices As the result of the 1J valve failure, the licensee performed a root cause analysis following the
 
event and contracted an independent engineering firm to perform a separate root cause
 
analysis. The licensee believes that the failure of the S/RV is related to the manufacturing
 
tolerances of the valve stem and piston assembly and to the lengthy service time without
 
adequate inspection and maintenance. The independent root cause analysis determined that
 
the lead thread of the piston was contacting the fillet of the shoulder, preventing shoulder-to- shoulder contact. Since the piston was not adequately attached to the stem, operational
 
vibration and valve actuation caused thread damage and eventual valve failure. The valve
 
vendor (Curtiss Wright Flow Control Corporation) has developed changes to the inspection and
 
refurbishment procedures to ensure proper shoulder-to-shoulder contact during valve
 
assembly. The BWR vendor (GE Nuclear Energy) is issuing a Service Information Letter (SIL)
to address the degradation found in the Hatch S/RVs.
 
The above-described circumstances emphasize the importance of periodic inspection of S/RV
 
main stage components to identify deficiencies and necessary corrective actions. All Target
 
Rock two-stage and three-stage S/RVs have similarly designed main stage components.
 
Currently 11 BWR plants in the U.S. have two-stage S/RVs, and 11 BWR plants have three- stage S/RVs.
 
The above described problems found in the main stages of Target Rock S/RVs are not related
 
to the problems found previously in the pilot stages of the S/RVs that were discussed in
 
Regulatory Issue Summary 2000-12, Resolution of Generic Safety Issue B-55.
 
This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any
 
questions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts
 
listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
 
/RA/
                                                William D. Beckner, Program Director
 
Operating Reactor Improvements Program
 
Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs
 
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
 
Technical Contacts:    Norman Garrett, Region II              Charles G. Hammer, NRR
 
(912) 367-9881                        (301) 415-2791 Email: nxg@nrc.gov                    Email: cgh@nrc.gov
 
Danny Billings, NRR
 
(301) 415-1175 Email: deb1@nrc.gov
 
Attachments: 1. Figure 1 - Target Rock Safety/Relief Valve
 
2. List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices
 
DISTRIBUTION:
ADAMS
 
IN File
 
ADAMS ACCESSION NUMBER: ML030140543 DOCUMENT NAME: G:\RORP\OES\Staff Folders\Info\Hatch SRV\Billings\Hatch SRV\Hatch SRV
 
IN.rev2.wpd
 
OFFICE OES:RORP:DRIP              Tech Editor          EMEB:DE                EMEB:DE
 
NAME DBillings                    PKleene              BRBonser                CGHammer
 
DATE    12/12/2002              12/04/2002            01/09/2003              12/18/2002 OFFICE Region II                  Region II            SC:OES:RORP:DRIP PD:RORP:DRIP
 
NAME NPGarrett                    BRBonser              TReis                  WDBeckner
 
DATE 12/20/2002  /    /2002  01/13/2003 01/15/2003 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
 
===Attachment 1 Attachment 2 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED===
                                      NRC INFORMATION NOTICES
 
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Information                                              Date of
 
Notice No.              Subject                          Issuance        Issued to
 
_____________________________________________________________________________________
2002-35          Changes to 10 CFR Parts 71            12/20/2002      All holders of 10 CFR Part 71 and 72 Quality Assurance                              quality assurance program
 
Programs                                              approvals and all 10 CFR Part 72 licensees and certificate holders.
 
2002-34          Failure of Safety-Related            11/25/2002      All holders of operating licenses
 
Circuit Breaker External                              or construction permits for
 
Auxiliary Switches at Columbia                        nuclear power reactors.
 
Generating Station
 
2002-33          Notification of Permanent            11/21/2002      All teletherapy and radiation
 
Injunction Against Neutron                            processing licensees.
 
Products Incorporated of
 
Dickerson, Maryland
 
2002-29          Recent Design Problems in            11/06/2002      All holders of operating licenses
 
(Errata)          Safety Functions of Pneumatic                          or construction permits for
 
Systems                                                nuclear power reactors.
 
2002-32          Electromigration on                  10/31/2002      All holders of operating licenses
 
Semiconductor Integrated                              for nuclear power reactors except
 
Circuits                                              those who have ceased
 
operations and have certified that
 
fuel has been permanently
 
removed from the reactor vessel.
 
2002-31          Potentially Defective UF6            10/31/2002      All licensees authorized to
 
Cylinder Valves (1-inch)                              possess and use source material
 
and/or special nuclear material for
 
the heating, emptying, filling, or
 
shipping of uranium hexafluoride
 
(UF6) in 30- and 48-inch cylinders.
 
2002-30          Control and Surveillance of          10/30/2002      All NRC licensees authorized to
 
Portable Gauges During Field                          possess, use, transport, and store
 
Operations                                            portable gauges.
 
Note:            NRC generic communications may be received in electronic format shortly after they are
 
issued by subscribing to the NRC listserver as follows:
                To subscribe send an e-mail to <listproc@nrc.gov >, no subject, and the following


Thread damage starts with the first actuation on the test stand, resulting in a loss of torqu Over time, vibration from normal plant operations causes fretting and wear of the valve stem shoulder and thread The piston rocks in the guide and wears grooves where the piston rings contact the guid Eventually the piston could significantly cock on the stem and wedge in the guide during valve actuation, which would prevent proper opening or closing of the valv The licensee has not been able to determine the time in operation required to damage a valve to the point of failur The licensee believes the failed 1J valve and the damaged 1F valve were in service for approximately 20 years without maintenanc The licensee is currently removing several S/RVs during each plant outage to ensure that all installed S/RVs are inspected and maintained at least every 6 year There are 11 S/RVs installed in each uni DiscussionAs the result of the 1J valve failure, the licensee performed a root cause analysis following theevent and contracted an independent engineering firm to perform a separate root cause analysi The licensee believes that the failure of the S/RV is related to the manufacturing tolerances of the valve stem and piston assembly and to the lengthy service time without adequate inspection and maintenanc The independent root cause analysis determined that the lead thread of the piston was contacting the fillet of the shoulder, preventing shoulder-to- shoulder contac Since the piston was not adequately attached to the stem, operational vibration and valve actuation caused thread damage and eventual valve failur The valve vendor (Curtiss Wright Flow Control Corporation) has developed changes to the inspection and refurbishment procedures to ensure proper shoulder-to-shoulder contact during valve assembl The BWR vendor (GE Nuclear Energy) is issuing a Service Information Letter (SIL)
command in the message portion:
to address the degradation found in the Hatch S/RVs.The above-described circumstances emphasize the importance of periodic inspection of S/RVmain stage components to identify deficiencies and necessary corrective action All Target Rock two-stage and three-stage S/RVs have similarly designed main stage component Currently 11 BWR plants in the U.S. have two-stage S/RVs, and 11 BWR plants have three- stage S/RVs.The above described problems found in the main stages of Target Rock S/RVs are not relatedto the problems found previously in the pilot stages of the S/RVs that were discussed in Regulatory Issue Summary 2000-12, "Resolution of Generic Safety Issue B-55." This information notice requires no specific action or written respons If you have anyquestions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager./RA/William D. Beckner, Program Director Operating Reactor Improvements Program Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical Contacts:Norman Garrett, Region IICharles G. Hammer, NRR(912) 367-9881(301) 415-2791 Email: nxg@nrc.govEmail: cgh@nrc.govDanny Billings, NRR(301) 415-1175 Email: deb1@nrc.gov
                                    subscribe gc-nrr firstname lastname


===Attachments:===
______________________________________________________________________________________
Figure 1 - Target Rock Safety/Relief Valve List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices As the result of the 1J valve failure, the licensee performed a root cause analysis following theevent and contracted an independent engineering firm to perform a separate root cause analysi The licensee believes that the failure of the S/RV is related to the manufacturing tolerances of the valve stem and piston assembly and to the lengthy service time without adequate inspection and maintenanc The independent root cause analysis determined that the lead thread of the piston was contacting the fillet of the shoulder, preventing shoulder-to- shoulder contac Since the piston was not adequately attached to the stem, operational vibration and valve actuation caused thread damage and eventual valve failur The valve vendor (Curtiss Wright Flow Control Corporation) has developed changes to the inspection and refurbishment procedures to ensure proper shoulder-to-shoulder contact during valve assembl The BWR vendor (GE Nuclear Energy) is issuing a Service Information Letter (SIL)
OL = Operating License
to address the degradation found in the Hatch S/RVs.The above-described circumstances emphasize the importance of periodic inspection of S/RVmain stage components to identify deficiencies and necessary corrective action All Target Rock two-stage and three-stage S/RVs have similarly designed main stage component Currently 11 BWR plants in the U.S. have two-stage S/RVs, and 11 BWR plants have three- stage S/RVs.The above described problems found in the main stages of Target Rock S/RVs are not relatedto the problems found previously in the pilot stages of the S/RVs that were discussed in Regulatory Issue Summary 2000-12, "Resolution of Generic Safety Issue B-55." This information notice requires no specific action or written respons If you have anyquestions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager./RA/William D. Beckner, Program Director Operating Reactor Improvements Program Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical Contacts:Norman Garrett, Region IICharles G. Hammer, NRR(912) 367-9881(301) 415-2791 Email: nxg@nrc.govEmail: cgh@nrc.govDanny Billings, NRR(301) 415-1175 Email: deb1@nrc.gov


===Attachments:===
CP = Construction Permit}}
Figure 1 - Target Rock Safety/Relief Valve List of Recently Issued NRC Information NoticesDISTRIBUTION:ADAMS IN File ADAMS ACCESSION NUMBER: ML030140543 DOCUMENT NAME: G:\RORP\OES\Staff Folders\Info\Hatch SRV\Billings\Hatch SRV\Hatch SRV IN.rev2.wpdOFFICEOES:RORP:DRIPTech EditorEMEB:DEEMEB:DENAMEDBillingsPKleeneBRBonserCGHammer DATE12/12/200212/04/200201/09/200312/18/2002OFFICERegion IIRegion IISC:OES:RORP:DRIPPD:RORP:DRIPNAMENPGarrettBRBonserTReisWDBeckner DATE12/20/2002 / /200201/13/200301/15/2003OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Attachment 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________OL = Operating License CP = Construction PermitAttachment 2 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUEDNRC INFORMATION NOTICES_____________________________________________________________________________________InformationDate of Notice N SubjectIssuanceIssued to_____________________________________________________________________________________2002-35Changes to 10 CFR Parts 71and 72 Quality Assurance Programs12/20/2002All holders of 10 CFR Part 71quality assurance program approvals and all 10 CFR Part 72 licensees and certificate holders.2002-34Failure of Safety-RelatedCircuit Breaker External Auxiliary Switches at Columbia Generating Station11/25/2002All holders of operating licensesor construction permits for nuclear power reactors.2002-33Notification of PermanentInjunction Against Neutron Products Incorporated of Dickerson, Maryland11/21/2002All teletherapy and radiationprocessing licensees. 2002-29(Errata)Recent Design Problems in Safety Functions of Pneumatic Systems11/06/2002All holders of operating licensesor construction permits for nuclear power reactors.2002-32Electromigration onSemiconductor Integrated Circuits10/31/2002All holders of operating licensesfor nuclear power reactors except those who have ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.2002-31Potentially Defective UF6Cylinder Valves (1-inch)10/31/2002All licensees authorized topossess and use source material and/or special nuclear material for the heating, emptying, filling, or shipping of uranium hexafluoride (UF6) in 30- and 48-inch cylinders.2002-30Control and Surveillance ofPortable Gauges During Field Operations10/30/2002All NRC licensees authorized topossess, use, transport, and store portable gauges.Note:NRC generic communications may be received in electronic format shortly after they areissued by subscribing to the NRC listserver as follows:To subscribe send an e-mail to <listproc@nrc.gov >, no subject, and the followingcommand in the message portion:subscribe gc-nrr firstname lastname}}


{{Information notice-Nav}}
{{Information notice-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 05:01, 24 November 2019

Failure of a Boiling Water Reactor Target Rock Main Steam Safety/Relief Valve
ML030140543
Person / Time
Issue date: 01/15/2003
From: Beckner W
NRC/NRR/DRIP/RORP
To:
Billings, Danny, NRR/OES/ROR, 415-1175
References
TAC M6480 IN-03-001
Download: ML030140543 (8)


UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 January 15, 2003 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2003-01: FAILURE OF A BOILING WATER REACTOR

TARGET ROCK MAIN STEAM SAFETY/RELIEF

VALVE

Addressees

All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for nuclear power reactors, except

those that have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been

permanently removed from the reactor.

Purpose

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alert

addressees to a recent failure of a main steam safety/relief valve on a boiling water reactor

(BWR). The NRC anticipates that recipients will review the information for applicability to their

facilities and consider taking appropriate actions. However, suggestions contained in this

information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response

is required.

Description of Circumstances

In April 2002, following a Unit 1 refueling outage at the Hatch Nuclear Plant, the safety/relief

valve (S/RV) in the 1J location began leaking. In an effort to stop the assumed pilot valve

leakage, the licensee cycled the S/RV at rated pressure and temperature. The valve failed to

fully open and then failed to reseat. The licensee continued the startup to allow identification of

potential balance-of-plant leakage. During the balance-of-plant startup, the associated S/RV

vacuum breaker failed due to repeated cycling, resulting in high unidentified drywell leakage.

The plant was shut down when the leakage exceeded the technical specification allowable

leakage (reference LER 50-321/2002-002).

The S/RVs installed in Unit 1 are Target Rock two-stage S/RVs. The main stage valve internals

(shown in attached Figure 1) are assembled by screwing the main piston onto the main stem so

that the piston moves inside the guide, installing a locking tab washer, and installing the stem

nut against the washers locking tab. The piston is torqued to 100 ft-lbs, the stem nut is torqued

to 50 ft-lbs, and the locking tab is bent to capture the stem nut. During the S/RV inspection

after the April 2002 shutdown, the failed valve was found to have a .003-inch clearance

between the main disc and its seat. When the valve was disassembled, the stem nut and the

piston were found to be loose. The stem nut was removed by hand and the piston was also

unthreaded by hand from the stem. However, the threads on the stem were severely damaged.

The piston was unthreaded by working it up to the good threads under the stem nut and

threading it onto this portion of the stem. The inside of the guide was heavily grooved and was

also worn by the piston edge wearing on the guide. The piston was visibly cocked on the valve

stem.

In an earlier event in 1999, the licensee had a different S/RV fail on the test stand. This failure

occurred during the fourth valve actuation when the stem nut fell off the stem and jammed in

the preload spring coils. The resulting uneven force caused the piston to cock in the guide.

The stem nut had lost torque and came unscrewed from the stem threads in spite of the locking

tab. Following this failure, the licensee instituted a program to check the torque on both the

stem nut and the piston. The licensee found in most cases, both the stem nut and the piston

had lost torque.

Following the failure of the 1J S/RV, the licensee closely examined three valves which had been

removed during the April 2002 refueling outage. The stem nuts and pistons of all three valves

had lost torque, the stems of two of the valves showed significant wear on the valve threads, and one valve exhibited some thread wear. All three valves showed signs of damage on the

stem shoulder, which is designed to contact the piston. In October 2002, the licensee removed

three additional S/RVs from Unit 1 for testing, disassembly, and inspection. All three valves

successfully stroked with steam pressure but when disassembled and inspected, were found to

have lost torque on both the stem nut and the piston. Two valves had fairly good threads and

the final valve (1F) had significant thread damage and a visibly cocked piston. All three valve

stems showed varying degrees of damage in the shoulder area.

The licensee believes the loss of torque and damage of the valve internals can be attributed to

the manufacturing tolerances of the valve stem and piston and to the lengthy service time

without adequate inspection and maintenance. The valve is designed so the valve stem screws

into the piston. The stem has a shoulder that seats against the piston shoulder. For the valves

that show little to no thread damage, the stem apparently seats properly against the piston and

most of the valve actuation force is carried by the stem and piston shoulders. For the valves

with thread damage, the licensee believes that the end of the lead thread of the piston contacts

the fillet that is machined into the shoulder of the valve stem. As shown in Figure 1, when this

occurs, the shoulder of the stem does not properly seat against the shoulder of the piston.

Thread damage starts with the first actuation on the test stand, resulting in a loss of torque.

Over time, vibration from normal plant operations causes fretting and wear of the valve stem

shoulder and threads. The piston rocks in the guide and wears grooves where the piston rings

contact the guide. Eventually the piston could significantly cock on the stem and wedge in the

guide during valve actuation, which would prevent proper opening or closing of the valve. The

licensee has not been able to determine the time in operation required to damage a valve to the

point of failure. The licensee believes the failed 1J valve and the damaged 1F valve were in

service for approximately 20 years without maintenance. The licensee is currently removing

several S/RVs during each plant outage to ensure that all installed S/RVs are inspected and

maintained at least every 6 years. There are 11 S/RVs installed in each unit. Discussion

As the result of the 1J valve failure, the licensee performed a root cause analysis following the

event and contracted an independent engineering firm to perform a separate root cause

analysis. The licensee believes that the failure of the S/RV is related to the manufacturing

tolerances of the valve stem and piston assembly and to the lengthy service time without

adequate inspection and maintenance. The independent root cause analysis determined that

the lead thread of the piston was contacting the fillet of the shoulder, preventing shoulder-to- shoulder contact. Since the piston was not adequately attached to the stem, operational

vibration and valve actuation caused thread damage and eventual valve failure. The valve

vendor (Curtiss Wright Flow Control Corporation) has developed changes to the inspection and

refurbishment procedures to ensure proper shoulder-to-shoulder contact during valve

assembly. The BWR vendor (GE Nuclear Energy) is issuing a Service Information Letter (SIL)

to address the degradation found in the Hatch S/RVs.

The above-described circumstances emphasize the importance of periodic inspection of S/RV

main stage components to identify deficiencies and necessary corrective actions. All Target

Rock two-stage and three-stage S/RVs have similarly designed main stage components.

Currently 11 BWR plants in the U.S. have two-stage S/RVs, and 11 BWR plants have three- stage S/RVs.

The above described problems found in the main stages of Target Rock S/RVs are not related

to the problems found previously in the pilot stages of the S/RVs that were discussed in

Regulatory Issue Summary 2000-12, Resolution of Generic Safety Issue B-55.

This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any

questions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts

listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.

/RA/

William D. Beckner, Program Director

Operating Reactor Improvements Program

Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contacts: Norman Garrett, Region II Charles G. Hammer, NRR

(912) 367-9881 (301) 415-2791 Email: nxg@nrc.gov Email: cgh@nrc.gov

Danny Billings, NRR

(301) 415-1175 Email: deb1@nrc.gov

Attachments: 1. Figure 1 - Target Rock Safety/Relief Valve

2. List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices As the result of the 1J valve failure, the licensee performed a root cause analysis following the

event and contracted an independent engineering firm to perform a separate root cause

analysis. The licensee believes that the failure of the S/RV is related to the manufacturing

tolerances of the valve stem and piston assembly and to the lengthy service time without

adequate inspection and maintenance. The independent root cause analysis determined that

the lead thread of the piston was contacting the fillet of the shoulder, preventing shoulder-to- shoulder contact. Since the piston was not adequately attached to the stem, operational

vibration and valve actuation caused thread damage and eventual valve failure. The valve

vendor (Curtiss Wright Flow Control Corporation) has developed changes to the inspection and

refurbishment procedures to ensure proper shoulder-to-shoulder contact during valve

assembly. The BWR vendor (GE Nuclear Energy) is issuing a Service Information Letter (SIL)

to address the degradation found in the Hatch S/RVs.

The above-described circumstances emphasize the importance of periodic inspection of S/RV

main stage components to identify deficiencies and necessary corrective actions. All Target

Rock two-stage and three-stage S/RVs have similarly designed main stage components.

Currently 11 BWR plants in the U.S. have two-stage S/RVs, and 11 BWR plants have three- stage S/RVs.

The above described problems found in the main stages of Target Rock S/RVs are not related

to the problems found previously in the pilot stages of the S/RVs that were discussed in

Regulatory Issue Summary 2000-12, Resolution of Generic Safety Issue B-55.

This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any

questions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts

listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.

/RA/

William D. Beckner, Program Director

Operating Reactor Improvements Program

Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contacts: Norman Garrett, Region II Charles G. Hammer, NRR

(912) 367-9881 (301) 415-2791 Email: nxg@nrc.gov Email: cgh@nrc.gov

Danny Billings, NRR

(301) 415-1175 Email: deb1@nrc.gov

Attachments: 1. Figure 1 - Target Rock Safety/Relief Valve

2. List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices

DISTRIBUTION:

ADAMS

IN File

ADAMS ACCESSION NUMBER: ML030140543 DOCUMENT NAME: G:\RORP\OES\Staff Folders\Info\Hatch SRV\Billings\Hatch SRV\Hatch SRV

IN.rev2.wpd

OFFICE OES:RORP:DRIP Tech Editor EMEB:DE EMEB:DE

NAME DBillings PKleene BRBonser CGHammer

DATE 12/12/2002 12/04/2002 01/09/2003 12/18/2002 OFFICE Region II Region II SC:OES:RORP:DRIP PD:RORP:DRIP

NAME NPGarrett BRBonser TReis WDBeckner

DATE 12/20/2002 / /2002 01/13/2003 01/15/2003 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Attachment 1 Attachment 2 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED

NRC INFORMATION NOTICES

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Information Date of

Notice No. Subject Issuance Issued to

_____________________________________________________________________________________

2002-35 Changes to 10 CFR Parts 71 12/20/2002 All holders of 10 CFR Part 71 and 72 Quality Assurance quality assurance program

Programs approvals and all 10 CFR Part 72 licensees and certificate holders.

2002-34 Failure of Safety-Related 11/25/2002 All holders of operating licenses

Circuit Breaker External or construction permits for

Auxiliary Switches at Columbia nuclear power reactors.

Generating Station

2002-33 Notification of Permanent 11/21/2002 All teletherapy and radiation

Injunction Against Neutron processing licensees.

Products Incorporated of

Dickerson, Maryland

2002-29 Recent Design Problems in 11/06/2002 All holders of operating licenses

(Errata) Safety Functions of Pneumatic or construction permits for

Systems nuclear power reactors.

2002-32 Electromigration on 10/31/2002 All holders of operating licenses

Semiconductor Integrated for nuclear power reactors except

Circuits those who have ceased

operations and have certified that

fuel has been permanently

removed from the reactor vessel.

2002-31 Potentially Defective UF6 10/31/2002 All licensees authorized to

Cylinder Valves (1-inch) possess and use source material

and/or special nuclear material for

the heating, emptying, filling, or

shipping of uranium hexafluoride

(UF6) in 30- and 48-inch cylinders.

2002-30 Control and Surveillance of 10/30/2002 All NRC licensees authorized to

Portable Gauges During Field possess, use, transport, and store

Operations portable gauges.

Note: NRC generic communications may be received in electronic format shortly after they are

issued by subscribing to the NRC listserver as follows:

To subscribe send an e-mail to <listproc@nrc.gov >, no subject, and the following

command in the message portion:

subscribe gc-nrr firstname lastname

______________________________________________________________________________________

OL = Operating License

CP = Construction Permit