NRC Generic Letter 1989-22: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 15: Line 15:
| page count = 5
| page count = 5
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES t BNUCLEAR REGULATORY  
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
COMMISSION
      t   BNUCLEAR               REGULATORY COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 October 19, 1989 TO: ALL LICENSEES  
                                WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 October 19, 1989 TO:       ALL LICENSEES OF OPERATING REACTORS AND HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION
OF OPERATING  
          PERMITS*
REACTORS AND HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION
SUBJECT:   POTENTIAL FOR INCREASED ROOF LOADS AND PLANT AREA FLOOD RUNOFF DEPTH
PERMITS*SUBJECT: POTENTIAL  
          AT LICENSED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS DUE TO RECENT CHANGE IN PROBABLE
FOR INCREASED  
          MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION CRITERIA DEVELOPED BY THE NATIONAL WEATHER
ROOF LOADS AND PLANT AREA FLOOD RUNOFF DEPTH AT LICENSED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS DUE TO RECENT CHANGE IN PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION  
          SERVICE (GENERIC LETTER 89-22)
CRITERIA DEVELOPED  
This letter is to inform you that the NRC staff has adopted for future plants the latest probable maximum precipitation (PMP) criteria published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Weather Service (NWS) to establish acceptable design configurations for safety-related nuclear power plant facilities. The staff has been using the PMP concept in plant flood design for well over 15 years. The criteria appear in Regulatory Guides, ANSI Standards, and Standard Review Plans (NUREG-0800) and were based primarily on procedures established in the 1940s and 1950s by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and National Weather Service (NWS).
BY THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE (GENERIC LETTER 89-22)This letter is to inform you that the NRC staff has adopted for future plants the latest probable maximum precipitation (PMP) criteria published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Weather Service (NWS) to establish acceptable design configurations for safety-related nuclear power plant facilities.
Since 1977, more recent PMP criteria have been published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Weather Service.


The staff has been using the PMP concept in plant flood design for well over 15 years. The criteria appear in Regulatory Guides, ANSI Standards, and Standard Review Plans (NUREG-0800)
These criteria are to be used to evaluate the degree of licensee compliance with the General Design Criterion 12 App A to 10 CFR Part 50. The new criteria are contained in NOAA/NWS Hydrometerological Reports (HMR) No. 49
and were based primarily on procedures established in the 1940s and 1950s by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and National Weather Service (NWS).Since 1977, more recent PMP criteria have been published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Weather Service.These criteria are to be used to evaluate the degree of licensee compliance with the General Design Criterion  
(1977), No. 51 (1978), No. 52 (1982), No. 53 (1980) and No. 55 (1984). One of the more significant changes in the new HMRs is that they now provide PMP
12 App A to 10 CFR Part 50. The new criteria are contained in NOAA/NWS Hydrometerological Reports (HMR) No. 49 (1977), No. 51 (1978), No. 52 (1982), No. 53 (1980) and No. 55 (1984). One of the more significant changes in the new HMRs is that they now provide PMP estimates for drainage areas as small as 1 square mile and for durations as small as 5 minutes. The previous reports generally only provided PMP estimates for areas of 10 square miles or greater and durations of 6 hours or more.There were empirical methods to subdivide the 6 hour duration to smaller increments, but there was never any methodology to estimate PMP for areas less than 10 square miles. Thus, the 10 square mile PMP values were used for site and roof drainage design. Current 1 square mile short duration PMP estimates are larger than those previously used.Staff has revised (Revision
estimates for drainage areas as small as 1 square mile and for durations as small as 5 minutes. The previous reports generally only provided PMP estimates for areas of 10 square miles or greater and durations of 6 hours or more.
3) Sections 2.4.2, Floods,' and 2.4.2, 'Probable Maximum Floods (PMF) on Streams and Rivers," of the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800)
to formally incorporate the latest NWS reports into the licensing 1* Five plants, Byron, Braidwood, Vogtle, South Texas, and River Bend, fully meet the new PMP Criteria and the licensees for these five plants may dis-i letter.91 180273t C
Generic Letter 89- 22 -2 -October 19, 1989 review process. In general, the latest NWS criteria call for higher rainfall intensities over shorter time intervals and smaller areas than have been previously considered.


In some cases, such events could result in higher site flooding levels and greater roof ponding loads than have been used in previous design studies.This information is provided for your review and determination of appropriate action, if any. No submittal is required.Sincerely, Jades G. Partlow Associate Director for Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure:
There were empirical methods to subdivide the 6 hour duration to smaller increments, but there was never any methodology to estimate PMP for areas less than 10 square miles. Thus, the 10 square mile PMP values were used for site and roof drainage design. Current 1 square mile short duration PMP estimates are larger than those previously used.
 
Staff has revised (Revision 3) Sections 2.4.2, Floods,' and 2.4.2, 'Probable Maximum Floods (PMF) on Streams and Rivers," of the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800) to formally incorporate the latest NWS reports into the licensing
1*  Five plants, Byron, Braidwood, Vogtle, South Texas, and River Bend, fully meet the new PMP Criteria and the licensees for these five plants may dis- i  letter.
 
91 180273t C
 
Generic Letter 89- 22                - 2 -                  October 19, 1989 review process. In general, the latest NWS criteria call for higher rainfall intensities over shorter time intervals and smaller areas than have been previously considered. In some cases, such events could result in higher site flooding levels and greater roof ponding loads than have been used in previous design studies.
 
This information is provided for your review and determination of appropriate action, if any. No submittal is required.
 
Sincerely, Jades G. Partlow Associate Director for Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure:
List of Most Recently Issued Generic Letters  
List of Most Recently Issued Generic Letters  


===Technical Contact:===
===Technical Contact:===
_____ _ __ _S. Chan, ESGB/NRR 492-0830  
_____                   _     __     _
S. Chan, ESGB/NRR
492-0830
 
LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED GENERIC LETTERS<_>
LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED GENERIC LETTERS<_>
Generic Date of T 1 ciiand-Issued To c.. I; , 4_.Letter NO. uu vLL ------ -89-22 89-21 POTENTIAL  
Generic                                       Date of c.. I; , 4_.                       1 ciiand- T                  Issued To Letter NO.   uu   vLL                                       ------     -
FOR INCREASED  
89-22       POTENTIAL FOR INCREASED ROOF       10/19/89       ALL LICENSEES OF
ROOF 10/19/89 LOADS AND PLANT AREA FLOOD RUNOFF DEPTH AT LICENSED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS DUE TO RECENT CHANGE IN PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION
            LOADS AND PLANT AREA FLOOD                       OPERATING REACTORS AND
CRITERIA DEVELOPED  
            RUNOFF DEPTH AT LICENSED                           HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION
BY THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE (GENERIC LETTER 89-22)REQUEST FOR INFORMATION  
            NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS DUE TO                       PERMITS (EXCEPT BYRON
10/19/89 CONCERNING  
            RECENT CHANGE IN PROBABLE                         BRAIDWOOD, VOGTLEO
STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION  
            MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION                             SOUTH TEXAS, AND RIVER
OF UNRESOLVED
            CRITERIA DEVELOPED BY THE                         BEND)
SAFETY ISSUE (USI) REQUIREMENTS
            NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE
PROTECTED  
            (GENERIC LETTER 89-22)
AREA LONG-TERM  
89-21      REQUEST FOR INFORMATION           10/19/89       ALL HOLDERS OF
09/26/89 HOUSEKEEPING
            CONCERNING STATUS OF                               OPERATING LICENSES
89-20 89-19 ALL LICENSEES
            IMPLEMENTATION OF UNRESOLVED                       AND CONSTRUCTION
OF OPERATING
            SAFETY ISSUE (USI) REQUIREMENTS                     PERMITS FOR NUCLEAR
REACTORS AND HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION
                                                              POWER REACTORS
PERMITS (EXCEPT BYRON BRAIDWOOD, VOGTLEO SOUTH TEXAS, AND RIVER BEND)ALL HOLDERS OF OPERATING
89-20      PROTECTED AREA LONG-TERM           09/26/89       ALL FUEL CYCLE
LICENSES AND CONSTRUCTION
            HOUSEKEEPING                                      FACILITY LICENSEES
PERMITS FOR NUCLEAR POWER REACTORS ALL FUEL CYCLE FACILITY LICENSEES WHO POSSESS, USE, OR PROCESS FORMULA QUANTITIES  
                                                              WHO POSSESS, USE,
OF STRATEGIC  
                                                                OR PROCESS FORMULA
SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL ALL LICENSEES
                                                                QUANTITIES OF
OF OPERATING
                                                                STRATEGIC SPECIAL
REACTORS, APPLICANTS
                                                                NUCLEAR MATERIAL
FOR OPERATING
89-19      REQUEST FOR ACTION RELATED TO 09/20/89             ALL LICENSEES OF
LICENSES AND HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION
            RESOLUTION OF UNRESOLVED                           OPERATING REACTORS,
PERMITS FOR LIGHT WATER REACTOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS ALL HOLDERS OF OPERATING
            SAFETY ISSUE A-47 "SAFETY                           APPLICANTS FOR
LICENSES OR CONSTRUCTION
            IMPLICATION OF CONTROL                             OPERATING LICENSES
PERMITS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS REQUEST FOR ACTION RELATED TO 09/20/89 RESOLUTION  
            SYSTEMS IN LWR NUCLEAR                             AND HOLDERS OF
OF UNRESOLVED
            POWER PLANTS" PURSUANT TO                         CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
SAFETY ISSUE A-47 "SAFETY IMPLICATION  
            10 CFR 50.54(f)                                   FOR LIGHT WATER
OF CONTROL SYSTEMS IN LWR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS" PURSUANT TO 10 CFR 50.54(f)89-18 RESOLUTION  
                                                                REACTOR NUCLEAR
OF UNRESOLVED
                                                                POWER PLANTS
SAFETY ISSUE A-17, "SYSTEMS INTERACTIONS  
89-18       RESOLUTION OF UNRESOLVED           09/06/89        ALL HOLDERS OF
IN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS 09/06/89 ACCESSION  
            SAFETY ISSUE A-17, "SYSTEMS                       OPERATING LICENSES
NUMBER IS 8909070029
            INTERACTIONS IN NUCLEAR                            OR CONSTRUCTION
89-17 PLANNED ADMINISTRATIVE
            POWER PLANTS                                        PERMITS FOR NUCLEAR
CHANGES TO THE NRC OPERATOR LICENSING  
                                                                POWER PLANTS
WRITTEN EXAMINA-TION PROCESS -GENERIC LETTER 89-17 09/06/89 ALL HOLDERS OF OPERATING
            ACCESSION NUMBER IS 8909070029
LICENSES OR CONSTRUCTION
89-17       PLANNED ADMINISTRATIVE             09/06/89        ALL HOLDERS OF
PERMITS FOR PWRS AND BWRS AND ALL LICENSED OPERATORS 89-16 INSTALLATION
            CHANGES TO THE NRC OPERATOR                         OPERATING LICENSES
WETWELL VENT LETTER 89-16)OF A HARDENED (GENERIC 09/01/89 ALL GE PLANTS  
            LICENSING WRITTEN EXAMINA-                         OR CONSTRUCTION
Generic Letter 89- 22-2 -October 19, 1989 review process. In general, the latest NWS criteria call for higher rainfall intensities over shorter time intervals and smaller areas than have been previously considered.
            TION PROCESS - GENERIC                             PERMITS FOR PWRS
            LETTER 89-17                                       AND BWRS AND ALL
                                                                LICENSED OPERATORS
89-16       INSTALLATION OF A HARDENED       09/01/89         ALL GE PLANTS
            WETWELL VENT (GENERIC
              LETTER 89-16)
 
Generic Letter 89- 22                     - 2 -                     October 19, 1989 review process. In general, the latest NWS criteria call for higher rainfall intensities over shorter time intervals and smaller areas than have been previously considered. In some cases, such events could result in higher site flooding levels and greater roof ponding loads than have been used in previous design studies.
 
This information is provided for your review and determination of appropriate action, if any. No submittal is required.


In some cases, such events could result in higher site flooding levels and greater roof ponding loads than have been used in previous design studies.This information action, if any.is provided for No submittal is your review and determination of appropriate required.Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY JAMES G. PARTLOW James G. Partlow Associate Director for Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure:
Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY JAMES G. PARTLOW
List of Most Recently Generic Letters  
                                                          James G. Partlow Associate Director for Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure:
          List of Most Recently Generic Letters  


===Technical Contact:===
===Technical Contact:===
S. Chan, ESGB/NRR 492-0830 DISTRIBUTION:
S. Chan, ESGB/NRR
Central Files NRC PDR I PD4 Reading P. O'Connor F. Hebdon G. Holahan F. Miraglia C. Berlinger J. Partlow 1K It1 VIaWY/ 14;~~I FTPD4JDRSP/PM  
          492-0830
:PD4/,DJS/  
          DISTRIBUTION:
:A 4/UKIU+rA  
          Central Files NRC PDR             I
/U :AA UI r'qq, :A---___: ------- o---a-h---n--  
          PD4 Reading P. O'Connor                                                                           1KVIaW
-r a :C ___ inge :J) -----a_NAME :PO'Connor:bj:FHe n :G olahan olahan :' tw DATE_ :---------  
                                                                                                It1 F. Hebdon G. Holahan F. Miraglia C. Berlinger J. Partlow
---/---/8- _--/89 _______/89  
                                                                                              / 14;~~
-- _ _______ -__ _- : ---------DATE :1 /X7)/89 :/2L1/89 :lf /%V /89 V' A% /89 : 8al9 M /&sect;/89 : l 5/89 f OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Document Name: GENERIC LETTER/PD4 DOCUMENT NAME: GENERIC LETTER/PD4 ORIGINATOR  
                                                                          I
NAME *: P. O'Connor x23026 SECRETARY  
FTPD4JDRSP/PM :PD4/,DJS/       :A       4/UKIU+rA           /U   :AA         UI
NAME: Beverly/Celeste x21340 SUBJECT: GENERIC LETTER 89-XX RE: DESIGN FOR PROBATE NAME E MAXIMUM DATE_ -&deg;\ lokh 1&deg;c\I I\F/Z/7 j 1.2.3.4.5.7.7.P. O'Connor F. Hebdon G. HoIahan3tj-'CA2 G. Holahan F. Miraglia C. Berlinger J. Partlow Secretary  
                                                                                r'qq,       :A
-Dispatch PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SHEET FROM PACKAGE* CAN THIS DOCUMENT BE DELETED FROM SYSTEM? YES SHOULD THIS DOCUMENT BE ARCHIVED?  
---         ___:               -------               o---a-h---n--   - ra  :C ___inge        -----
YES ---- NO_NO}}
                                                                                            :J) a_
NAME :PO'Connor:bj:FHe n         :G olahan           olahan       :'                           tw DATE_ :--------- --- /---/8-   _--/89           _______/89               _  --__
                                                                              _______     - :---------
                                                                                        _-
DATE :1 /X7)/89   :/2L1/89     :lf /%V /89       V'A%/89         :   8al9     M /&sect;/89 :       l 5/89 f
          OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
          Document Name: GENERIC LETTER/PD4
 
DOCUMENT NAME:
GENERIC LETTER/PD4 ORIGINATOR NAME *:
P. O'Connor x23026 SECRETARY NAME:
Beverly/Celeste x21340
SUBJECT:
GENERIC LETTER 89-XX RE: DESIGN FOR PROBATE E MAXIMUM
                          NAME                DATE
                1.   P. O'Connor
                2.  F. Hebdon
                3.  G. HoIahan3tj-'CA2
                                              _-&deg;\ lokh
                4.  G. Holahan                 1&deg;c\I I\
                5.  F. Miraglia C. Berlinger                           j F/Z/7
                7.  J. Partlow
                7.  Secretary - Dispatch PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SHEET FROM PACKAGE
*   CAN THIS DOCUMENT BE DELETED FROM SYSTEM? YES         NO
      SHOULD THIS DOCUMENT BE ARCHIVED? YES ---- NO_}}


{{GL-Nav}}
{{GL-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 02:16, 24 November 2019

NRC Generic Letter 1989-022: Potential for Increase Roof Loads and Plant Area Flood Runoff Depth at Licensed Nuclear Power Plants Due to Recent Change in Probable Max. Precipitation Criteria Developed by National Weather Service
ML031210438
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Hope Creek, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Vermont Yankee, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Comanche Peak, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, 05000000, Zimmer, Fort Saint Vrain, Washington Public Power Supply System, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant, Clinch River, Crane
Issue date: 10/19/1989
From: Partlow J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
References
NUREG-0800 GL-89-022, NUDOCS 8910180273
Download: ML031210438 (5)


UNITED STATES

t BNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 October 19, 1989 TO: ALL LICENSEES OF OPERATING REACTORS AND HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION

PERMITS*

SUBJECT: POTENTIAL FOR INCREASED ROOF LOADS AND PLANT AREA FLOOD RUNOFF DEPTH

AT LICENSED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS DUE TO RECENT CHANGE IN PROBABLE

MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION CRITERIA DEVELOPED BY THE NATIONAL WEATHER

SERVICE (GENERIC LETTER 89-22)

This letter is to inform you that the NRC staff has adopted for future plants the latest probable maximum precipitation (PMP) criteria published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Weather Service (NWS) to establish acceptable design configurations for safety-related nuclear power plant facilities. The staff has been using the PMP concept in plant flood design for well over 15 years. The criteria appear in Regulatory Guides, ANSI Standards, and Standard Review Plans (NUREG-0800) and were based primarily on procedures established in the 1940s and 1950s by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and National Weather Service (NWS).

Since 1977, more recent PMP criteria have been published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Weather Service.

These criteria are to be used to evaluate the degree of licensee compliance with the General Design Criterion 12 App A to 10 CFR Part 50. The new criteria are contained in NOAA/NWS Hydrometerological Reports (HMR) No. 49

(1977), No. 51 (1978), No. 52 (1982), No. 53 (1980) and No. 55 (1984). One of the more significant changes in the new HMRs is that they now provide PMP

estimates for drainage areas as small as 1 square mile and for durations as small as 5 minutes. The previous reports generally only provided PMP estimates for areas of 10 square miles or greater and durations of 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> or more.

There were empirical methods to subdivide the 6 hour6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> duration to smaller increments, but there was never any methodology to estimate PMP for areas less than 10 square miles. Thus, the 10 square mile PMP values were used for site and roof drainage design. Current 1 square mile short duration PMP estimates are larger than those previously used.

Staff has revised (Revision 3) Sections 2.4.2, Floods,' and 2.4.2, 'Probable Maximum Floods (PMF) on Streams and Rivers," of the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800) to formally incorporate the latest NWS reports into the licensing

1* Five plants, Byron, Braidwood, Vogtle, South Texas, and River Bend, fully meet the new PMP Criteria and the licensees for these five plants may dis- i letter.

91 180273t C

Generic Letter 89- 22 - 2 - October 19, 1989 review process. In general, the latest NWS criteria call for higher rainfall intensities over shorter time intervals and smaller areas than have been previously considered. In some cases, such events could result in higher site flooding levels and greater roof ponding loads than have been used in previous design studies.

This information is provided for your review and determination of appropriate action, if any. No submittal is required.

Sincerely, Jades G. Partlow Associate Director for Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure:

List of Most Recently Issued Generic Letters

Technical Contact:

_____ _ __ _

S. Chan, ESGB/NRR

492-0830

LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED GENERIC LETTERS<_>

Generic Date of c.. I; , 4_. 1 ciiand- T Issued To Letter NO. uu vLL ------ -

89-22 POTENTIAL FOR INCREASED ROOF 10/19/89 ALL LICENSEES OF

LOADS AND PLANT AREA FLOOD OPERATING REACTORS AND

RUNOFF DEPTH AT LICENSED HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION

NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS DUE TO PERMITS (EXCEPT BYRON

RECENT CHANGE IN PROBABLE BRAIDWOOD, VOGTLEO

MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION SOUTH TEXAS, AND RIVER

CRITERIA DEVELOPED BY THE BEND)

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE

(GENERIC LETTER 89-22)

89-21 REQUEST FOR INFORMATION 10/19/89 ALL HOLDERS OF

CONCERNING STATUS OF OPERATING LICENSES

IMPLEMENTATION OF UNRESOLVED AND CONSTRUCTION

SAFETY ISSUE (USI) REQUIREMENTS PERMITS FOR NUCLEAR

POWER REACTORS

89-20 PROTECTED AREA LONG-TERM 09/26/89 ALL FUEL CYCLE

HOUSEKEEPING FACILITY LICENSEES

WHO POSSESS, USE,

OR PROCESS FORMULA

QUANTITIES OF

STRATEGIC SPECIAL

NUCLEAR MATERIAL

89-19 REQUEST FOR ACTION RELATED TO 09/20/89 ALL LICENSEES OF

RESOLUTION OF UNRESOLVED OPERATING REACTORS,

SAFETY ISSUE A-47 "SAFETY APPLICANTS FOR

IMPLICATION OF CONTROL OPERATING LICENSES

SYSTEMS IN LWR NUCLEAR AND HOLDERS OF

POWER PLANTS" PURSUANT TO CONSTRUCTION PERMITS

10 CFR 50.54(f) FOR LIGHT WATER

REACTOR NUCLEAR

POWER PLANTS

89-18 RESOLUTION OF UNRESOLVED 09/06/89 ALL HOLDERS OF

SAFETY ISSUE A-17, "SYSTEMS OPERATING LICENSES

INTERACTIONS IN NUCLEAR OR CONSTRUCTION

POWER PLANTS PERMITS FOR NUCLEAR

POWER PLANTS

ACCESSION NUMBER IS 8909070029

89-17 PLANNED ADMINISTRATIVE 09/06/89 ALL HOLDERS OF

CHANGES TO THE NRC OPERATOR OPERATING LICENSES

LICENSING WRITTEN EXAMINA- OR CONSTRUCTION

TION PROCESS - GENERIC PERMITS FOR PWRS

LETTER 89-17 AND BWRS AND ALL

LICENSED OPERATORS

89-16 INSTALLATION OF A HARDENED 09/01/89 ALL GE PLANTS

WETWELL VENT (GENERIC

LETTER 89-16)

Generic Letter 89- 22 - 2 - October 19, 1989 review process. In general, the latest NWS criteria call for higher rainfall intensities over shorter time intervals and smaller areas than have been previously considered. In some cases, such events could result in higher site flooding levels and greater roof ponding loads than have been used in previous design studies.

This information is provided for your review and determination of appropriate action, if any. No submittal is required.

Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY JAMES G. PARTLOW

James G. Partlow Associate Director for Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure:

List of Most Recently Generic Letters

Technical Contact:

S. Chan, ESGB/NRR

492-0830

DISTRIBUTION:

Central Files NRC PDR I

PD4 Reading P. O'Connor 1KVIaW

It1 F. Hebdon G. Holahan F. Miraglia C. Berlinger J. Partlow

/ 14;~~

I

FTPD4JDRSP/PM :PD4/,DJS/ :A 4/UKIU+rA /U :AA UI

r'qq, :A

--- ___: ------- o---a-h---n-- - ra :C ___inge -----

J) a_

NAME :PO'Connor:bj:FHe n :G olahan olahan  :' tw DATE_ :--------- --- /---/8- _--/89 _______/89 _ --__

_______ - :---------

_-

DATE :1 /X7)/89  :/2L1/89 :lf /%V /89 V'A%/89  : 8al9 M /§/89 : l 5/89 f

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Document Name: GENERIC LETTER/PD4

DOCUMENT NAME:

GENERIC LETTER/PD4 ORIGINATOR NAME *:

P. O'Connor x23026 SECRETARY NAME:

Beverly/Celeste x21340

SUBJECT:

GENERIC LETTER 89-XX RE: DESIGN FOR PROBATE E MAXIMUM

NAME DATE

1. P. O'Connor

2. F. Hebdon

3. G. HoIahan3tj-'CA2

_-°\ lokh

4. G. Holahan 1°c\I I\

5. F. Miraglia C. Berlinger j F/Z/7

7. J. Partlow

7. Secretary - Dispatch PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SHEET FROM PACKAGE

  • CAN THIS DOCUMENT BE DELETED FROM SYSTEM? YES NO

SHOULD THIS DOCUMENT BE ARCHIVED? YES ---- NO_

Template:GL-Nav