ML072080346: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 07/23/2007
| issue date = 07/23/2007
| title = Comment (3) of Beth A. Wetzel on Behalf of Tennessee Valley Authority Regarding Proposed Generic Communication Concerning Managing Gas Intrusion
| title = Comment (3) of Beth A. Wetzel on Behalf of Tennessee Valley Authority Regarding Proposed Generic Communication Concerning Managing Gas Intrusion
| author name = Wetzel B A
| author name = Wetzel B
| author affiliation = Tennessee Valley Authority
| author affiliation = Tennessee Valley Authority
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:L2 Tennessee Valley Authority, 1101 Market Streeet., Chat.'zartcoga.  
{{#Wiki_filter:L2 Tennessee Valley Authority, 1101 Market Streeet., Chat.'zartcoga. - -e .- '0--.(
-t-,,S -e .-'0--.(July 23, 2007 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission MS T6-D59 11545 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738 ATTN: Chief, Rulemaking, Directives and Editing Branch Gentlemen:
t-,,S July 23, 2007 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission r~.)
73]Ti 71]TI r~.)M C/TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY (TVA) -Comments ON Proposed GenerfcJ Communication CONCERNING Managing gas intrusion (Vol. 72 FR 29010-290V15)
MS T6-D59 11545 Rockville Pike                                                             73]          M Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738                                                     Ti ATTN: Chief, Rulemaking, Directives and Editing Branch                             71]
TVA appreciates the opportunity to review and provide comments to the subject generic letter. The generic letter addresses the issue of gas intrusion into the emergency core cooling, decay heat removal, and containment spray systems..TVA offers the following comment: TVA believes that casting the 40 events at Sequoyah mentioned in the subject Federal Register Notice as "waterhammer events" is misleading.
Gentlemen:
In common nuclear industry use, the term waterhammer has the connotation of a large pressure transient that causes significant dynamic loads in the associated piping, subsequent pipe movement, and (in many cases) damage to the piping supports and the piping itself.The subject events at Sequoyah varied widely in magnitude and did not involve violent pipe movement.
TI         C/
As mentioned in the draft, the events did not result in Residual Heat Removal (RHR) system inoperability.
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY (TVA) - Comments ON Proposed GenerfcJ Communication CONCERNING Managing gas intrusion (Vol. 72 FR 29010-290V15)
Rather, most of these events occurred when the Sequoyah RHR system was isolated.
TVA appreciates the opportunity to review and provide comments to the subject generic letter. The generic letter addresses the issue of gas intrusion into the emergency core cooling, decay heat removal, and containment spray systems.
In this condition, "out gas" pockets formed within system high points and caused less significant gas bubble compressions. -If the generic letter continues to reference the 40 Sequoyah events, the description of these events should be modified to provide a proper context.If you have questions regarding our comments, please contact Rob Brown at (423) 751-7228.Sincerely, Beth A. Wetzel Manager, Corporate Licensing and Industry Affairs Nni5 D or' L'/ Jld P")P 1 er U.S. Regulatory Commission Page 2 July 23, 2007 RMB:RPS cc: Tony Langley, PAB 1G-BFN W. M. Justice, LP 6A-C G. W. Morris, OPS 4C-SQN L. A. Moore, BR4X-C W. A. Eberly, LP 4H-C J. D. Smith, ADM 1L-WBN K. W. Whittenburg, SP 2B-C EDMS, WT CA-K}}
.TVA offers the following comment:
TVA believes that casting the 40 events at Sequoyah mentioned in the subject Federal Register Notice as "waterhammer events" is misleading. In common nuclear industry use, the term waterhammer has the connotation of a large pressure transient that causes significant dynamic loads in the associated piping, subsequent pipe movement, and (in many cases) damage to the piping supports and the piping itself.
The subject events at Sequoyah varied widely in magnitude and did not involve violent pipe movement. As mentioned in the draft, the events did not result in Residual Heat Removal (RHR) system inoperability. Rather, most of these events occurred when the Sequoyah RHR system was isolated. In this condition, "out gas" pockets formed within system high points and caused less significant gas bubble compressions. -Ifthe generic letter continues to reference the 40 Sequoyah events, the description of these events should be modified to provide a proper context.
If you have questions regarding our comments, please contact Rob Brown at (423) 751-7228.
Sincerely, Beth A. Wetzel Manager, Corporate Licensing and Industry Affairs Nni5 Dor'L'/ P")P er Jld            1
 
U.S. Regulatory Commission Page 2 July 23, 2007 RMB:RPS cc: Tony Langley, PAB 1G-BFN W. M. Justice, LP 6A-C G. W. Morris, OPS 4C-SQN L. A. Moore, BR4X-C W. A. Eberly, LP 4H-C J. D. Smith, ADM 1L-WBN K. W. Whittenburg, SP 2B-C EDMS, WT CA-K}}

Latest revision as of 05:12, 23 November 2019

Comment (3) of Beth A. Wetzel on Behalf of Tennessee Valley Authority Regarding Proposed Generic Communication Concerning Managing Gas Intrusion
ML072080346
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 07/23/2007
From: Wetzel B
Tennessee Valley Authority
To:
Rulemaking, Directives, and Editing Branch
References
72FR29010 00003
Download: ML072080346 (2)


Text

L2 Tennessee Valley Authority, 1101 Market Streeet., Chat.'zartcoga. - -e .- '0--.(

t-,,S July 23, 2007 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission r~.)

MS T6-D59 11545 Rockville Pike 73] M Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738 Ti ATTN: Chief, Rulemaking, Directives and Editing Branch 71]

Gentlemen:

TI C/

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY (TVA) - Comments ON Proposed GenerfcJ Communication CONCERNING Managing gas intrusion (Vol. 72 FR 29010-290V15)

TVA appreciates the opportunity to review and provide comments to the subject generic letter. The generic letter addresses the issue of gas intrusion into the emergency core cooling, decay heat removal, and containment spray systems.

.TVA offers the following comment:

TVA believes that casting the 40 events at Sequoyah mentioned in the subject Federal Register Notice as "waterhammer events" is misleading. In common nuclear industry use, the term waterhammer has the connotation of a large pressure transient that causes significant dynamic loads in the associated piping, subsequent pipe movement, and (in many cases) damage to the piping supports and the piping itself.

The subject events at Sequoyah varied widely in magnitude and did not involve violent pipe movement. As mentioned in the draft, the events did not result in Residual Heat Removal (RHR) system inoperability. Rather, most of these events occurred when the Sequoyah RHR system was isolated. In this condition, "out gas" pockets formed within system high points and caused less significant gas bubble compressions. -Ifthe generic letter continues to reference the 40 Sequoyah events, the description of these events should be modified to provide a proper context.

If you have questions regarding our comments, please contact Rob Brown at (423) 751-7228.

Sincerely, Beth A. Wetzel Manager, Corporate Licensing and Industry Affairs Nni5 Dor'L'/ P")P er Jld 1

U.S. Regulatory Commission Page 2 July 23, 2007 RMB:RPS cc: Tony Langley, PAB 1G-BFN W. M. Justice, LP 6A-C G. W. Morris, OPS 4C-SQN L. A. Moore, BR4X-C W. A. Eberly, LP 4H-C J. D. Smith, ADM 1L-WBN K. W. Whittenburg, SP 2B-C EDMS, WT CA-K