ML100550542: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Lyon, Warren Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 2:54 PM To: RILEY, Jim Cc: Cranston, Gregory; Woodyatt, Diana; Beaulieu, David; Wilhelm, Martha | {{#Wiki_filter:From: Lyon, Warren Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 2:54 PM To: RILEY, Jim Cc: Cranston, Gregory; Woodyatt, Diana; Beaulieu, David; Wilhelm, Martha | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Status update and items we need to address Attachments: Completion List for NEI.xls | Status update and items we need to address Attachments: Completion List for NEI.xls Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged (Martha - would you see that this email and attachment gets into ADAMS - publically available and normal release schedule.) | ||
Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged | |||
The attachment is a summary of our review status. If there are no entries to the right of the first two columns, then we have not started review of that plant. The entries are limited to SRXB activities. An entry in the last column indicates we have transmitted our inspection suggestions to the applicable region and we have sent our draft closure memo to DORL - in other words, the SRXB aspect of the individual plant review is complete. | The attachment is a summary of our review status. If there are no entries to the right of the first two columns, then we have not started review of that plant. The entries are limited to SRXB activities. An entry in the last column indicates we have transmitted our inspection suggestions to the applicable region and we have sent our draft closure memo to DORL - in other words, the SRXB aspect of the individual plant review is complete. | ||
In response to the workshop requests, we previously sent you a copy of our generic inspection suggestions document our reviewers consult when performing their final reviews. We have decided that the plant-specific documents will not be publically available since they address pre-inspection planning and the licensees should have an understanding of the inspection coverage from the generic document, the TI, and other documentation. | In response to the workshop requests, we previously sent you a copy of our generic inspection suggestions document our reviewers consult when performing their final reviews. We have decided that the plant-specific documents will not be publically available since they address pre-inspection planning and the licensees should have an understanding of the inspection coverage from the generic document, the TI, and other documentation. | ||
I owe you a feedback on TSTF but I'm waiting for information industry pulled together when the licensees addressed a possible TSTF approach some months ago - info that will help me so that I do not have to start from scratch and I anticipate will provide the benefit of a number of people's thoughts. When may I expect to receive this info? | I owe you a feedback on TSTF but I'm waiting for information industry pulled together when the licensees addressed a possible TSTF approach some months ago - info that will help me so that I do not have to start from scratch and I anticipate will provide the benefit of a number of people's thoughts. When may I expect to receive this info? | ||
I also need schedules for when we will receive the following: | I also need schedules for when we will receive the following: | ||
- The NEI 90-10 update - note we are actively planning the method for endorsement of the update assuming it is will be consistent with our expectations. And I anticipate working with you as the update is developed. However, it will take some time for the process to work after we receive the doc. | |||
- The final Purdue test report | |||
- The Simplified Equation report | |||
- A listing of documents/methods that NEI and the owners groups recommend for addressing gas movement through the systems I need the last three in order to update our acceptance criteria that we, including the regions, will use for inspections and assessment of operability issues. | |||
E-mail Properties | |||
Mail Envelope Properties (A56E37EC1CBC8045910287CEF5E7AE6C1D52FC2BCC) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Status update and items we need to address Sent Date: | Status update and items we need to address Sent Date: 2/23/2010 2:54:12 PM Received Date: 2/23/2010 2:54:12 PM From: Lyon, Warren Created By: Warren.Lyon@nrc.gov Recipients: | ||
Created By: | |||
Recipients: | |||
jhr@nei.org (RILEY, Jim) | jhr@nei.org (RILEY, Jim) | ||
Tracking Status: None Gregory.Cranston@nrc.gov (Cranston, Gregory) | Tracking Status: None Gregory.Cranston@nrc.gov (Cranston, Gregory) | ||
Line 45: | Line 38: | ||
Tracking Status: None David.Beaulieu@nrc.gov (Beaulieu, David) | Tracking Status: None David.Beaulieu@nrc.gov (Beaulieu, David) | ||
Tracking Status: None Martha.Wilhelm@nrc.gov (Wilhelm, Martha) | Tracking Status: None Martha.Wilhelm@nrc.gov (Wilhelm, Martha) | ||
Tracking Status: None | Tracking Status: None Post Office: | ||
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 58582 2/23/2010 Completion List for NEI.xls 38614 Options Expiration Date: | |||
Post Office: | Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: Follow up. Start by Tuesday, February 23, 2010. Due by Tuesday, February 23, 2010}} | ||
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov | |||
Files | |||
MESSAGE | |||
Options Expiration Date: | |||
Priority: | |||
Sensitivity: |
Latest revision as of 21:35, 13 November 2019
ML100550542 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Nuclear Energy Institute |
Issue date: | 02/23/2010 |
From: | Lyons W NRC/NRR/DSS/SRXB |
To: | Jeffrey Riley Nuclear Energy Institute |
Lyon W, DSSA/SRXB, 415-2897 | |
References | |
Download: ML100550542 (1) | |
Text
From: Lyon, Warren Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 2:54 PM To: RILEY, Jim Cc: Cranston, Gregory; Woodyatt, Diana; Beaulieu, David; Wilhelm, Martha
Subject:
Status update and items we need to address Attachments: Completion List for NEI.xls Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged (Martha - would you see that this email and attachment gets into ADAMS - publically available and normal release schedule.)
The attachment is a summary of our review status. If there are no entries to the right of the first two columns, then we have not started review of that plant. The entries are limited to SRXB activities. An entry in the last column indicates we have transmitted our inspection suggestions to the applicable region and we have sent our draft closure memo to DORL - in other words, the SRXB aspect of the individual plant review is complete.
In response to the workshop requests, we previously sent you a copy of our generic inspection suggestions document our reviewers consult when performing their final reviews. We have decided that the plant-specific documents will not be publically available since they address pre-inspection planning and the licensees should have an understanding of the inspection coverage from the generic document, the TI, and other documentation.
I owe you a feedback on TSTF but I'm waiting for information industry pulled together when the licensees addressed a possible TSTF approach some months ago - info that will help me so that I do not have to start from scratch and I anticipate will provide the benefit of a number of people's thoughts. When may I expect to receive this info?
I also need schedules for when we will receive the following:
- The NEI 90-10 update - note we are actively planning the method for endorsement of the update assuming it is will be consistent with our expectations. And I anticipate working with you as the update is developed. However, it will take some time for the process to work after we receive the doc.
- The final Purdue test report
- The Simplified Equation report
- A listing of documents/methods that NEI and the owners groups recommend for addressing gas movement through the systems I need the last three in order to update our acceptance criteria that we, including the regions, will use for inspections and assessment of operability issues.
E-mail Properties
Mail Envelope Properties (A56E37EC1CBC8045910287CEF5E7AE6C1D52FC2BCC)
Subject:
Status update and items we need to address Sent Date: 2/23/2010 2:54:12 PM Received Date: 2/23/2010 2:54:12 PM From: Lyon, Warren Created By: Warren.Lyon@nrc.gov Recipients:
jhr@nei.org (RILEY, Jim)
Tracking Status: None Gregory.Cranston@nrc.gov (Cranston, Gregory)
Tracking Status: None Diana.Woodyatt@nrc.gov (Woodyatt, Diana)
Tracking Status: None David.Beaulieu@nrc.gov (Beaulieu, David)
Tracking Status: None Martha.Wilhelm@nrc.gov (Wilhelm, Martha)
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 58582 2/23/2010 Completion List for NEI.xls 38614 Options Expiration Date:
Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: Follow up. Start by Tuesday, February 23, 2010. Due by Tuesday, February 23, 2010