ML110260106: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 01/26/2011
| issue date = 01/26/2011
| title = EN-11-004, Issuance of Final Significance Determination and Notice of Violation
| title = EN-11-004, Issuance of Final Significance Determination and Notice of Violation
| author name = Hilton N D, Hott C A
| author name = Hilton N, Hott C
| author affiliation = NRC/OE
| author affiliation = NRC/OE
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 14: Line 14:
| document type = Enforcement Action, Enforcement Notification
| document type = Enforcement Action, Enforcement Notification
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
| project =
| stage = Approval
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:January 26, 2011 EN 11-004 OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT NOTIFICATION OF SIGNIFICANT ENFORCEMENT ACTION Licensee:        Carolina Power and Light Company                              EA-10-257 H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit 2 Docket No. 50-261
==Subject:==
ISSUANCE OF FINAL SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATION AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION This is to inform the Commission of escalated enforcement actions that will be issued in a Notice of Violation associated with two White Significance Determination Process findings on or around January 31, 2010, to Carolina Power and Light Company (Licensee) as a result of inspections at H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit 2.
The first White finding, an issue with low to moderate safety significance associated with violations, involved the failure to adequately implement requirements, as required by Technical Specifications 5.8.1, Procedures, of multiple procedures during an uncontrolled cooldown of the Reactor Coolant System (RCS) and subsequent safety injection after a reactor trip on March 28, 2010. The safety injection occurred because operators failed to take required procedural actions to stop the uncontrolled cooldown. A second example involved failure by operators to identify a loss of component cooling water flow to the thermal barrier heat exchangers coincident with a failure to identify a loss of charging pump suction that resulted in inadequate seal injection flow. A third example involved the re-energizing of electrically faulted equipment that damaged surrounding equipment and resulted in electrical ground alarms, which required an Alert emergency declaration.
The second White finding, also an issue of low to moderate safety significance, which also included a violation, involved the failure to adequately design and implement operator training based on learning objectives as required by 10 CFR 55.59(c)4. Specifically, training lesson material failed to identify the basis of a procedural action involving reactor coolant pump seal cooling, as required by a systems approach to training, as defined in 10 CFR 55.4. This finding also included examples, deemed not to be violations of regulatory requirements, in which the licensees operator training program did not meet a self-imposed licensee standard.
It should be noted that the licensee has not been specifically informed of the enforcement action. The schedule of issuance and notification is:
Mailing of Final Significance Determination                    January 31, 2011 Telephone Notification of Licensee                            January 31, 2011 The State of South Carolina will be notified.
CONTACTS: Chris Hott, OE, (301) 415-1167                      Nick Hilton, OE, (301) 415-3055
DISTRIBUTION: EN-11-004, January 26, 2011 OWFN                OWFN        TWFN      EBB  Regional Offices Chairman Jaczko      EDO          OCFO      NMSS RI      RII Comm. Svinicki      DEDR        OP CENTER      RIII    RIV Comm. Apostolakis    DEDMRS      FSME Comm. Magwood        OE          OIG            MAIL Comm. Ostendorff    OGC          OCIO          ADAMS SECY                NRR          RES            OE staff OCA                  NSIR        ACRS PA                  OI IP DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC OE R/F R. Zimmerman, OE A. Campbell, OE EN binder ADAMS Accession Number : ML110260106 OFFICE      OE:ES              OE:BC NAME        CHott              NHilton DATE        1/25/2011          1/26/2011 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}}

Latest revision as of 05:13, 13 November 2019

EN-11-004, Issuance of Final Significance Determination and Notice of Violation
ML110260106
Person / Time
Site: Robinson Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/26/2011
From: Nick Hilton, Hott C
NRC/OE
To:
Carolina Power & Light Co
Hott, Christopher NRC/OE 415-1167
References
EA-10-257 EN-11-004
Download: ML110260106 (2)


Text

January 26, 2011 EN 11-004 OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT NOTIFICATION OF SIGNIFICANT ENFORCEMENT ACTION Licensee: Carolina Power and Light Company EA-10-257 H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit 2 Docket No. 50-261

Subject:

ISSUANCE OF FINAL SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATION AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION This is to inform the Commission of escalated enforcement actions that will be issued in a Notice of Violation associated with two White Significance Determination Process findings on or around January 31, 2010, to Carolina Power and Light Company (Licensee) as a result of inspections at H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit 2.

The first White finding, an issue with low to moderate safety significance associated with violations, involved the failure to adequately implement requirements, as required by Technical Specifications 5.8.1, Procedures, of multiple procedures during an uncontrolled cooldown of the Reactor Coolant System (RCS) and subsequent safety injection after a reactor trip on March 28, 2010. The safety injection occurred because operators failed to take required procedural actions to stop the uncontrolled cooldown. A second example involved failure by operators to identify a loss of component cooling water flow to the thermal barrier heat exchangers coincident with a failure to identify a loss of charging pump suction that resulted in inadequate seal injection flow. A third example involved the re-energizing of electrically faulted equipment that damaged surrounding equipment and resulted in electrical ground alarms, which required an Alert emergency declaration.

The second White finding, also an issue of low to moderate safety significance, which also included a violation, involved the failure to adequately design and implement operator training based on learning objectives as required by 10 CFR 55.59(c)4. Specifically, training lesson material failed to identify the basis of a procedural action involving reactor coolant pump seal cooling, as required by a systems approach to training, as defined in 10 CFR 55.4. This finding also included examples, deemed not to be violations of regulatory requirements, in which the licensees operator training program did not meet a self-imposed licensee standard.

It should be noted that the licensee has not been specifically informed of the enforcement action. The schedule of issuance and notification is:

Mailing of Final Significance Determination January 31, 2011 Telephone Notification of Licensee January 31, 2011 The State of South Carolina will be notified.

CONTACTS: Chris Hott, OE, (301) 415-1167 Nick Hilton, OE, (301) 415-3055

DISTRIBUTION: EN-11-004, January 26, 2011 OWFN OWFN TWFN EBB Regional Offices Chairman Jaczko EDO OCFO NMSS RI RII Comm. Svinicki DEDR OP CENTER RIII RIV Comm. Apostolakis DEDMRS FSME Comm. Magwood OE OIG MAIL Comm. Ostendorff OGC OCIO ADAMS SECY NRR RES OE staff OCA NSIR ACRS PA OI IP DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC OE R/F R. Zimmerman, OE A. Campbell, OE EN binder ADAMS Accession Number : ML110260106 OFFICE OE:ES OE:BC NAME CHott NHilton DATE 1/25/2011 1/26/2011 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY