ML17207A818: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ACCESSION wBH: F AC IL: 50 250 50-251 bv-335 AUTll NATE UHR I lJ g k~E~kF C IP~AAilE EISE~nur,O,G.
{{#Wiki_filter:aEuuLAT     y I"iFOkiiA1ION urST erSUTIO l                 STE~ CRrOS)
aEuuLAT y I"iFOkiiA1ION urST erSUTIO l STE~CRrOS)d002150a65 OOC,OA TF.: FJO/02/11"(UTAH Ilgwu: filJ Tur Key Point Pl anti Unit 3<Florida Power and Ljqht C Turkey Point Plant<mini t 4~Flor i@a Po~er and Liat t C St, Lur.ie Planti Unit 1I Florio~Power 4 Light Go.AUTHOR AFF1L IA T 1<fi<F I or i aa Power>C~D~wEG IP lE" T AF F IL I~1 ilies Office of"uclear reactor Regulation OQCKi=T 05000250 n251
ACCESSION wBH: d002150a65                 OOC,OA TF.:       FJO/02/11       "(UTAH Ilgwu: filJ         OQCKi= T F AC IL: 50 250      Tur Key Point     Pl anti Unit 3< Florida Power and Ljqht C 05000250 50-251 Turkey Point Plant< mini t 4~ Flor i@a Po~er and Liat t C                                   n251 bv-335 St, Lur.ie Planti Unit 1I Florio~ Power 4 Light Go.
AUTll NATE                AUTHOR AFF1L IA           <fi<
UHR I lJ k E g  ~
kF C IP AAilE
            ~
                  ~        F or i aa Power>C~
I wEG IP lE" T T 1 AF F IL I ~ ilies 1
D~
EISE~nur,O,G.            Office of "uclear reactor Regulation


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
F orwar fs resoonse to I'G 7910nl 4 1017 re(>uests for info r e loss of of fs>te oozier.,events.Description of si.>ni f>cant sys<<wive i~orove~ents h info re+glor o.ffs~te events encl.(w~<o45'u&~~/~R rx~/~w DISTR IBv l IO~couE: Au155 GOP IBS kt GEI vs O: L Tk~F<<GL~Slit..TITl.E: Onsite Emergency Vower Systems REGIVIEt r I 0 GOOE/'cA 4E AG T ION: 05 BC~P~~C)Ft~~~INTERNAL 0-~FTL 13 c 16~iP 4 18 I~C SYS~R 21 REAC SF TY BR 23 AOV REAC dR 25 CHIR ASSAI 8 27 HGOONAI Or 0 AEOO STS GROUP LEAOi<COPIES LT IR E'~GL 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RF.G IP IEf4 T IO CUOE/WA~E"" CRIB+t oz<W%i~'f 15 OELO 17 AUX IL 5Y5~3k 20 F!iGH bk 22 PLANT SYS Bk 20 P'v'H S Y S UR 26 TONOI p 0 50 EEU S rtA BAUER Goprt,s Ll TR El CL 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EXTERNAL: 03 LPOR 31 ACRS 1 1 16 16 04 BASIC 1 1"~8 80)g@PS'V TOTAL i~UMHE,H UF COPIES REVUI,REO; I T Tk~e,i~>CL Office of Nuclear Reactor Regul ation Attention:
F orwar fs resoonse to I'G 7910nl 4 1017 re(>uests for info r e loss of of fs> te oozier .,events.Description of si.>ni f >cant DISTR IBv l IO~ couE:
Mr.Darrell G.Eisenhut, Acting Director Division of Operating Reactors U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555
(w~<o45'u Au155    GOP
                                                &~~/
sys<<wive i~orove~ents h info re +glor o.ffs~te events encl.
IBS     kt GEI vs O: L Tk     ~~ F <<GL   ~Slit.. rx ~ /~w TITl.E: Onsite Emergency Vower Systems REGIVIEt r           COPIES                  RF.G IP IEf4 T            Goprt,s I 0 GOOE/'cA 4E       LT IR E'~GL            IO CUOE/WA~E              Ll TR El CL AG T ION:       05 BC   ~P ~
C)Ft~ ~~
                                      ~
1                 "" CRIB+           t 1    0 INTERNAL        0  ~FTL                  1        1        oz<W%i~'f                       1      1 13    c                    2                  15 OELO                         1      1 16 ~iP 4                    1        1        17 AUX IL 5Y5 ~3k               1      1 18 I~C SYS ~R              1        1        20 F!iGH bk                     1      1 21 REAC SF TY BR            1        1        22 PLANT SYS Bk                 1      1 23 AOV REAC dR              1        1        20 P'v'H S Y S UR               1      1 25 CHIR ASSAI 8            1        1        26 TONOI p 0                   1      1 27 HGOONAI Or 0             1         1       50 EEU                          1 AEOO                        1         1       S  rtA BAUER                    1     1 STS  GROUP  LEAOi<        1         1 EXTERNAL: 03 LPOR                           1         1       04 BASIC                       1     1 31  ACRS                  16      16
                                                                                                    "~8 80
                                                                                                            )g@
TOTAL i~UMHE,H UF COPIES           REVUI,REO;     I   T Tk PS'V
                                                                ~     e,i~>CL


==Dear Mr.Eisenhut:==
February 1 1, .1980 L-49-80 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regul ation Attention: Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Acting Director Division of Operating Reactors U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555
February 1 1,.1980 L-49-80 Re: Turkey Point and St.Lucie Plants Docket Nos.50-250, 50-251, and 50-335 Offsite Power This letter is forwarded in response to letters dated October 1 and October 17, 1979 from Mr.A.Schwencer and Mr.R.W.Reid of your staff.The NRC letters were on the general subject of offsite power and requested considerable information specific to loss of offsite power events experienced by Florida Power t Light Company (FPL).The detailed compilation of the requested information represents an extensive effort to segregate data on offsite power events, much of which already exists in other FPL reports.At this point, we have determined that it would be less time consuming (an important consideration given the manpower constraints caused by NUREG-0578) and possibly more useful for us to describe the many significant system-wide improvements we have made since our first nuclear unit became operational in 1972.This description is provided in Attachment 1 and shows the degree of change experienced by the FPL transmission system over the intervening years.Thus, for the purpose of evaluating an electrical transmission system, the value of compiling detailed information on offsite power events from several years past would appear to be much less for the FPL system than for a system that had not been changed.A listing of major FPL offsite power events is presented in Attachment 2.Each event was analyzed to determine its cause and to develop recommendations to help prevent recurrence.
 
A large number of such reccmmendations have been implemented, with a consequent increase in the stability and reliability of the FPL system.In general the improvements can be categorized as follows: (1)an increase in the number and capacity of transmission lines, with plans for further expansion of the 500 kV portion of the system,, (2)improved control by means of an advanced electronic control system, simulator training, and improved switching procedures and emergency control procedures, (3)improved system relay protection, and o~(4)revised system operating pol icies.~3 Hr.Oarrell G.Eisenhut, Acting Director Page 2 In an attempt to supply as much information as possible while minimizing our staff workload, we have compiled a list of references related to the events listed in Attachment 2.The references are presented in Attachment 3.We hope that the attached information will satisfy your staff's request.However, if additional information is needed to resolve any remaining concerns, please let me know.FPL is more than willi ng to respond to your staff's concerns, but we would like to do so in a manner that minimizes the impact on our limited resources.
==Dear Mr. Eisenhut:==
Very truly yours,/~-i Robert E.Uhri g Vice President Advanced Systems 5 (Technology REU/tSS/cph Attachments (3)cc: '1r.J.P.O'Reilly, Region II Harold Reis, Esquire}}
 
Re:   Turkey Point and St. Lucie Plants Docket Nos. 50-250, 50-251, and 50-335 Offsite   Power This   letter is forwarded in response to letters dated October 1 and October 17, 1979 from Mr. A. Schwencer and Mr. R. W. Reid of your staff. The NRC letters were on the general subject of offsite power and requested considerable information specific to loss of offsite power events experienced by Florida Power     t Light Company (FPL).
The   detailed compilation of the requested information represents an extensive effort to   segregate data on offsite power events, much of which already exists in other FPL reports. At this point, we have determined that it would be less time consuming (an important consideration given the manpower constraints caused by NUREG-0578) and possibly more useful for us to describe the many significant system-wide improvements we have made since our first nuclear unit became operational in 1972.     This description is provided in Attachment 1 and shows the degree of change experienced by the FPL transmission system over the intervening years. Thus, for the purpose of evaluating an electrical transmission system, the value of compiling detailed information on offsite power events from several years past would appear to be much less for the FPL system than for a system that had not been changed.
A listing of   major FPL offsite power events is presented in Attachment 2.
Each event was analyzed     to determine its cause and to develop recommendations to help prevent recurrence. A large number of such reccmmendations have been implemented, with a consequent increase in the stability and reliability of the FPL system. In general the improvements can be categorized as follows:
(1)   an increase in the number and capacity of transmission lines, with plans for further expansion of the 500 kV portion of the system,,
(2)   improved control by means of an advanced electronic control system, simulator training,   and improved switching procedures and emergency control procedures, (3)   improved system relay   protection, and                         o~
(4)   revised system operating pol icies.                               ~3
 
Hr. Oarrell   G. Eisenhut, Acting Director Page 2 In an attempt to supply as much information as possible while minimizing our staff workload, we have       compiled a list of references related to the events listed in Attachment 2.         The references are presented in Attachment 3.
We hope   that the attached information will satisfy your staff's request.
However,   if additional information is needed to resolve any remaining concerns, please let me know. FPL is more than willing to respond to your staff's concerns, but we would like to do so in a manner that minimizes the impact on our limited resources.
Very   truly yours,
                  /~- i Robert E. Uhri g                   (
Vice President Advanced Systems       5 Technology REU/tSS/cph Attachments (3) cc: '1r. J. P. O'Reilly, Region     II Harold Reis, Esquire}}

Revision as of 00:30, 30 October 2019

Forwards Response to NRC 791001 & 17 Requests for Info Re Loss of Offsite Power Events.Description of Significant sys-wide Improvements & Info Re Major Offsite Events Encl
ML17207A818
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie, Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/11/1980
From: Robert E. Uhrig
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17207A819 List:
References
L-49-80, NUDOCS 8002150465
Download: ML17207A818 (3)


Text

aEuuLAT y I"iFOkiiA1ION urST erSUTIO l STE~ CRrOS)

ACCESSION wBH: d002150a65 OOC,OA TF.: FJO/02/11 "(UTAH Ilgwu: filJ OQCKi= T F AC IL: 50 250 Tur Key Point Pl anti Unit 3< Florida Power and Ljqht C 05000250 50-251 Turkey Point Plant< mini t 4~ Flor i@a Po~er and Liat t C n251 bv-335 St, Lur.ie Planti Unit 1I Florio~ Power 4 Light Go.

AUTll NATE AUTHOR AFF1L IA <fi<

UHR I lJ k E g ~

kF C IP AAilE

~

~ F or i aa Power>C~

I wEG IP lE" T T 1 AF F IL I ~ ilies 1

D~

EISE~nur,O,G. Office of "uclear reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

F orwar fs resoonse to I'G 7910nl 4 1017 re(>uests for info r e loss of of fs> te oozier .,events.Description of si.>ni f >cant DISTR IBv l IO~ couE:

(w~<o45'u Au155 GOP

&~~/

sys<<wive i~orove~ents h info re +glor o.ffs~te events encl.

IBS kt GEI vs O: L Tk ~~ F <<GL ~R Slit.. rx ~ /~w TITl.E: Onsite Emergency Vower Systems REGIVIEt r COPIES RF.G IP IEf4 T Goprt,s I 0 GOOE/'cA 4E LT IR E'~GL IO CUOE/WA~E Ll TR El CL AG T ION: 05 BC ~P ~

C)Ft~ ~~

~

1 "" CRIB+ t 1 0 INTERNAL 0 ~FTL 1 1 oz<W%i~'f 1 1 13 c 2 15 OELO 1 1 16 ~iP 4 1 1 17 AUX IL 5Y5 ~3k 1 1 18 I~C SYS ~R 1 1 20 F!iGH bk 1 1 21 REAC SF TY BR 1 1 22 PLANT SYS Bk 1 1 23 AOV REAC dR 1 1 20 P'v'H S Y S UR 1 1 25 CHIR ASSAI 8 1 1 26 TONOI p 0 1 1 27 HGOONAI Or 0 1 1 50 EEU 1 AEOO 1 1 S rtA BAUER 1 1 STS GROUP LEAOi< 1 1 EXTERNAL: 03 LPOR 1 1 04 BASIC 1 1 31 ACRS 16 16

"~8 80

)g@

TOTAL i~UMHE,H UF COPIES REVUI,REO; I T Tk PS'V

~ e,i~>CL

February 1 1, .1980 L-49-80 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regul ation Attention: Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Acting Director Division of Operating Reactors U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555

Dear Mr. Eisenhut:

Re: Turkey Point and St. Lucie Plants Docket Nos. 50-250, 50-251, and 50-335 Offsite Power This letter is forwarded in response to letters dated October 1 and October 17, 1979 from Mr. A. Schwencer and Mr. R. W. Reid of your staff. The NRC letters were on the general subject of offsite power and requested considerable information specific to loss of offsite power events experienced by Florida Power t Light Company (FPL).

The detailed compilation of the requested information represents an extensive effort to segregate data on offsite power events, much of which already exists in other FPL reports. At this point, we have determined that it would be less time consuming (an important consideration given the manpower constraints caused by NUREG-0578) and possibly more useful for us to describe the many significant system-wide improvements we have made since our first nuclear unit became operational in 1972. This description is provided in Attachment 1 and shows the degree of change experienced by the FPL transmission system over the intervening years. Thus, for the purpose of evaluating an electrical transmission system, the value of compiling detailed information on offsite power events from several years past would appear to be much less for the FPL system than for a system that had not been changed.

A listing of major FPL offsite power events is presented in Attachment 2.

Each event was analyzed to determine its cause and to develop recommendations to help prevent recurrence. A large number of such reccmmendations have been implemented, with a consequent increase in the stability and reliability of the FPL system. In general the improvements can be categorized as follows:

(1) an increase in the number and capacity of transmission lines, with plans for further expansion of the 500 kV portion of the system,,

(2) improved control by means of an advanced electronic control system, simulator training, and improved switching procedures and emergency control procedures, (3) improved system relay protection, and o~

(4) revised system operating pol icies. ~3

Hr. Oarrell G. Eisenhut, Acting Director Page 2 In an attempt to supply as much information as possible while minimizing our staff workload, we have compiled a list of references related to the events listed in Attachment 2. The references are presented in Attachment 3.

We hope that the attached information will satisfy your staff's request.

However, if additional information is needed to resolve any remaining concerns, please let me know. FPL is more than willing to respond to your staff's concerns, but we would like to do so in a manner that minimizes the impact on our limited resources.

Very truly yours,

/~- i Robert E. Uhri g (

Vice President Advanced Systems 5 Technology REU/tSS/cph Attachments (3) cc: '1r. J. P. O'Reilly, Region II Harold Reis, Esquire