ML18019A052: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Guzman, Richard To: Mirzai, Mahvash Cc: RidsNRRLIC109 Resource | {{#Wiki_filter:From: Guzman, Richard To: Mirzai, Mahvash Cc: RidsNRRLIC109 Resource; Walpole, Robert W | ||
; Walpole, Robert W | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review Determination: Indian Point Unit 2 - Relief Request IP2-ISI-RR-05 Alternative Examination Volume Code Case N-724-4 (EPID: L-2017-LLR-0157) | Acceptance Review Determination: Indian Point Unit 2 - Relief Request IP2-ISI-RR-05 Alternative Examination Volume Code Case N-724-4 (EPID: L-2017-LLR-0157) | ||
Date: Friday, January 19, 2018 9:31:00 AM Mahvash, By letter dated December 20, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No. ML17362A038), Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. submitted Relief Request No. 05 (IP2-ISI-RR-05) for Indian Point Unit No. 2 (IP2) to use an alternative to the 2007 Edition with the 2008 Addenda of ASME Section XI as augmented by Code Case N-729-4 requirements with limitations/modifications for use stated in 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(D)(2). | Date: Friday, January 19, 2018 9:31:00 AM | ||
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) | : Mahvash, By letter dated December 20, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No. ML17362A038), Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. submitted Relief Request No. 05 (IP2-ISI-RR-05) for Indian Point Unit No. 2 (IP2) to use an alternative to the 2007 Edition with the 2008 Addenda of ASME Section XI as augmented by Code Case N-729-4 requirements with limitations/modifications for use stated in 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(D)(2). | ||
Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC | The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review for this licensing action. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the relief request has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in the characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that the review of this relief request will take approximately 30 hours to complete. | The NRC staff has reviewed your request for relief and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the relief request in terms of protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | ||
The NRC staff expects to complete this review by March 10, 2018. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date (greater than a month) or significant changes in the forecasted hours (greater than 25%), the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. These estimates are based on the NRC | Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that the review of this relief request will take approximately 30 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by March 10, 2018. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date (greater than a month) or significant changes in the forecasted hours (greater than 25%), | ||
Please contact me if you have any questions. | the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | ||
A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | Please contact me if you have any questions. A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS. | ||
Rich Guzman Sr. PM, Division Operator Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office: O-9C7 l Phone: (301) 415-1030 Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov}} | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | ||
Rich Guzman Sr. PM, Division Operator Reactor Licensing | |||
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office: O-9C7 l Phone: (301) 415-1030 Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov}} | |||
Revision as of 03:14, 22 October 2019
| ML18019A052 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 01/19/2018 |
| From: | Richard Guzman Plant Licensing Branch 1 |
| To: | Mirzai M Entergy Nuclear Operations |
| Guzman R | |
| References | |
| EPID L-2017-LLR-0157 | |
| Download: ML18019A052 (2) | |
Text
From: Guzman, Richard To: Mirzai, Mahvash Cc: RidsNRRLIC109 Resource; Walpole, Robert W
Subject:
Acceptance Review Determination: Indian Point Unit 2 - Relief Request IP2-ISI-RR-05 Alternative Examination Volume Code Case N-724-4 (EPID: L-2017-LLR-0157)
Date: Friday, January 19, 2018 9:31:00 AM
- Mahvash, By letter dated December 20, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No. ML17362A038), Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. submitted Relief Request No. 05 (IP2-ISI-RR-05) for Indian Point Unit No. 2 (IP2) to use an alternative to the 2007 Edition with the 2008 Addenda of ASME Section XI as augmented by Code Case N-729-4 requirements with limitations/modifications for use stated in 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(D)(2).
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review for this licensing action. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the relief request has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in the characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your request for relief and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the relief request in terms of protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that the review of this relief request will take approximately 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by March 10, 2018. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date (greater than a month) or significant changes in the forecasted hours (greater than 25%),
the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
Please contact me if you have any questions. A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rich Guzman Sr. PM, Division Operator Reactor Licensing
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office: O-9C7 l Phone: (301) 415-1030 Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov