ML14268A350: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[IR 05000354/2014003]]
{{Adams
| number = ML14268A350
| issue date = 09/25/2014
| title = NRC Inspection Report 05000354/2014003 and Non-Cited Violation, and PSEG Letter Dated August 27, 2014
| author name = Nieh H
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRP
| addressee name = Joyce T
| addressee affiliation = PSEG Nuclear, LLC
| docket = 05000354
| license number = NPF-057
| contact person = KHAN, C
| case reference number = EA-14-145
| document report number = IR-2014-003
| document type = Letter
| page count = 3
}}
See also: [[see also::IR 05000354/2014003]]
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I 2100 RENAISSANCE BLVD., SUITE 100 KING OF PRUSSIA, PA  19406-2713  September 25, 2014    EA-14-145  Mr. Thomas P. Joyce President and Chief Nuclear Officer PSEG Nuclear LLC  N09  P.O. Box 236  Hancocks Bridge, NJ  08038-0236  SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000354/2014003 AND NON-CITED VIOLATION, HOPE CREEK AND YOUR LETTER DATED AUGUST 27, 2014  Dear Mr. Joyce:  letter.    Our letter of July 28, 2014, documented one non-cited violation which was identified by the NRC during an inspection at Hope Creek (Inspection Report No. 05000354/2014003).  The NRC occurred because PSEG procedures HC.OP-AR.ZZ-0006 and HC.OP-AR.ZZ-0022 could potentially complicate an internal flooding event and adversely affect assumptions in Hope (Green) and was treated as a non-cited violation.    The PSEG letter denied that a performance deficiency existed and stated that a non-cited violation should not have been issued.  The letter also stated that if the NRC concludes a performance deficiency does exist, it cannot be substantiated as more than minor.  Lastly, the the associated cross-cutting aspect is not clear.  The basis for each of these disputes was provided.  The NRC is in the process of reviewing the been completed.  be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room  or from the NRC document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.   
T. Joyce  2    Please contact Raymond Powell at (610) 337-6967 if you have any questions regarding this matter.  Your cooperation with us is appreciated.  Sincerely,  /RA Michael L. Scott Acting for/  Ho K. Nieh Director Division of Reactor Projects  Docket No.:  05-354 License No.:  NPF-57  cc:  Distribution via ListServ 
 
  ML14268A350    SUNSI Review  Non-Sensitive  Sensitive  Publicly Available  Non-Publicly Available  OFFICE RI/DRP RI/ORA RI/DRP RI/DRP  NAME CKhan/ CBK BBickett/ CBK for RPowell/ RJP HNieh/ MLS for  DATE 09/24/14 09/24/14 09/25/14 09/2514
}}

Revision as of 08:46, 21 June 2019

NRC Inspection Report 05000354/2014003 and Non-Cited Violation, and PSEG Letter Dated August 27, 2014
ML14268A350
Person / Time
Site: Hope Creek PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 09/25/2014
From: Ho Nieh
Division Reactor Projects I
To: Joyce T
Public Service Enterprise Group
KHAN, C
References
EA-14-145 IR-2014-003
Download: ML14268A350 (3)


See also: IR 05000354/2014003

Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I 2100 RENAISSANCE BLVD., SUITE 100 KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406-2713 September 25, 2014 EA-14-145 Mr. Thomas P. Joyce President and Chief Nuclear Officer PSEG Nuclear LLC N09 P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038-0236 SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000354/2014003 AND NON-CITED VIOLATION, HOPE CREEK AND YOUR LETTER DATED AUGUST 27, 2014 Dear Mr. Joyce: letter. Our letter of July 28, 2014, documented one non-cited violation which was identified by the NRC during an inspection at Hope Creek (Inspection Report No. 05000354/2014003). The NRC occurred because PSEG procedures HC.OP-AR.ZZ-0006 and HC.OP-AR.ZZ-0022 could potentially complicate an internal flooding event and adversely affect assumptions in Hope (Green) and was treated as a non-cited violation. The PSEG letter denied that a performance deficiency existed and stated that a non-cited violation should not have been issued. The letter also stated that if the NRC concludes a performance deficiency does exist, it cannot be substantiated as more than minor. Lastly, the the associated cross-cutting aspect is not clear. The basis for each of these disputes was provided. The NRC is in the process of reviewing the been completed. be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.

T. Joyce 2 Please contact Raymond Powell at (610) 337-6967 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Your cooperation with us is appreciated. Sincerely, /RA Michael L. Scott Acting for/ Ho K. Nieh Director Division of Reactor Projects Docket No.: 05-354 License No.: NPF-57 cc: Distribution via ListServ

ML14268A350 SUNSI Review Non-Sensitive Sensitive Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available OFFICE RI/DRP RI/ORA RI/DRP RI/DRP NAME CKhan/ CBK BBickett/ CBK for RPowell/ RJP HNieh/ MLS for DATE 09/24/14 09/24/14 09/25/14 09/2514