ML082610185: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML082610185
| number = ML082610185
| issue date = 09/17/2008
| issue date = 09/17/2008
| title = Wolf Creek Generating Station - Acceptance Review Email, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.5.2, ECCS - Operating, in Accordance with TSTF-325A
| title = Acceptance Review Email, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.5.2, ECCS - Operating, in Accordance with TSTF-325A
| author name = Singal B K
| author name = Singal B K
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV

Revision as of 08:48, 17 April 2019

Acceptance Review Email, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.5.2, ECCS - Operating, in Accordance with TSTF-325A
ML082610185
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 09/17/2008
From: Singal B K
Plant Licensing Branch IV
To: Hoope D
Wolf Creek
Singal, Balwant, 415-3016, NRR/DORL/LPL4
References
TAC MD9491
Download: ML082610185 (1)


Text

From: Balwant Singal Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 8:01 AM To: dihoope@WCNOC.com Cc: stwidem@WCNOC.com; Matthew Hamm; Michael Markley

Subject:

Acceptance of Application to Revise TS 3.5.2 - TAC MD 9491 Diane: By letter dated August 18, 2008, Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC) submitted a license amendment request for Wolf Creek. The proposed amendment would revise Technical Specification (TS) 3.5.2, "ECCS - Operating," in accordance with TSTF-325A. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-3016.

Balwant K. Singal Senior Project Manager (Comanche Peak, Wolf Creek, and Palo Verde) Nuclear Regulatory Commission Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Balwant.Singal@nrc.gov Tel: (301) 415-3016 Fax: (301) 415-1222 E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()

Subject:

Acceptance of Application to Revise TS 3.5.2 - TAC MD 9491 Sent Date: 9/17/2008 7:57:15 AM Received Date: 9/17/2008 8:00:00 AM From: Balwant Singal

Created By: Balwant.Singal@nrc.gov

Recipients:

dihoope@WCNOC.com (dihoope@WCNOC.com) Tracking Status: None stwidem@WCNOC.com (stwidem@WCNOC.com) Tracking Status: None Matthew.Hamm@nrc.gov (Matthew Hamm)

Tracking Status: None Michael.Markley@nrc.gov (Michael Markley)

Tracking Status: None

Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time

MESSAGE 10199 9/17/2008

Options Expiration Date:

Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False

Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: