ML18282A191: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = Letter
| document type = Letter
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
| project =
| stage = Other
}}
}}



Revision as of 21:07, 3 February 2019

Purdue University - Interlock Language Retention in Technical Specification Submission Supporting License Amendment Request, PUR-1, Docket 50-182
ML18282A191
Person / Time
Site: Purdue University
Issue date: 10/05/2018
From: Townsend C
Purdue University Research Reactor
To: Montgomery C K
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML18282A190 List:
References
Download: ML18282A191 (1)


Text

Nuclear Engineering Building

  • 400 Central Drive
  • West Lafayette, IN 47907

-2017 (765) 494-5739

  • Fax: (765) 494

-9570

SUBJECT:

Interlock Language Retention In Technical Specification Submission Supporting License Amendment Request, PUR

-1, Docket 50

-182

Dear Ms. Montgomery,

Upon further consideration of the proposed wording of Inhibit vs Interlock indications in the Technical Specifications and the operator console, Purdue is requesting to return to the text as in the license renewal Technical Specifications (ML16267A001). This will maximize operator and regulatory clarity. The complete revision pages are now attached.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Executed on October 5, 2018. Sincerely, /SA/ Clive Townsend PUR-1 Reactor Supervisor School of Nuclear Engineering

Enclosure:

Technical Specifications Page Revision s