05000331/FIN-2018010-01: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| finding integer = 01 | | finding integer = 01 | ||
| quarter = 2018Q1 | | quarter = 2018Q1 | ||
| IR section = | | IR section = NO SECTION | ||
| finding type = NCV | | finding type = NCV | ||
| significance = | | significance = Green | ||
| cornerstone = Initiating Events | | cornerstone = Initiating Events | ||
| violation of = | | violation of = | ||
| identified by = NRC | | identified by = NRC | ||
| Inspection procedure = IP | | Inspection procedure = IP 71111.05T | ||
| Inspector = | | Inspector = A Dahbur, I Hafeez, J Patel, R Daley | ||
| CCA = | | CCA = | ||
| INPO aspect = | | INPO aspect = WP.3 | ||
| description = The inspectors identified a finding of very-low safety significance (Green), and associated Non-Cited Violation of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part50.48(c), and National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)805, Section 3.4.2,Pre-Fire Plans. Specifically, the inspectors identified two examples for the licensees failure to have current and detailed pre-fire plans. The first example for the failure to provide adequate guidance in the pre-fire plans for smoke and heat removal in the event of a fire in switchgear rooms. The second example was for the failure to show the addition of the Flexible Coping Strategiesbattery packsas a potential hazard in the pre-fire plan for the battery roomcorridor. | | description = The inspectors identified a finding of very-low safety significance (Green), and associated Non-Cited Violation of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part50.48(c), and National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)805, Section 3.4.2,Pre-Fire Plans. Specifically, the inspectors identified two examples for the licensees failure to have current and detailed pre-fire plans. The first example for the failure to provide adequate guidance in the pre-fire plans for smoke and heat removal in the event of a fire in switchgear rooms. The second example was for the failure to show the addition of the Flexible Coping Strategiesbattery packsas a potential hazard in the pre-fire plan for the battery roomcorridor. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 17:35, 10 September 2018
Site: | Duane Arnold |
---|---|
Report | IR 05000331/2018010 Section NO SECTION |
Date counted | Mar 31, 2018 (2018Q1) |
Type: | NCV: Green |
cornerstone | Initiating Events |
Identified by: | NRC identified |
Inspection Procedure: | IP 71111.05T |
Inspectors (proximate) | A Dahbur I Hafeez J Patel R Daley |
INPO aspect | WP.3 |
' | |