05000331/FIN-2018010-01: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
| finding integer = 01
| finding integer = 01
| quarter = 2018Q1
| quarter = 2018Q1
| IR section = HUMAN PERFORMANCE
| IR section = NO SECTION
| finding type = NCV
| finding type = NCV
| significance =  
| significance = Green
| cornerstone = Initiating Events
| cornerstone = Initiating Events
| violation of =  
| violation of =  
| identified by = NRC
| identified by = NRC
| Inspection procedure = IP NO SECTION
| Inspection procedure = IP 71111.05T
| Inspector = 71111.05
| Inspector = A Dahbur, I Hafeez, J Patel, R Daley
| CCA = WP.3
| CCA =  
| INPO aspect = NO SL
| INPO aspect = WP.3
| description = The inspectors identified a finding of very-low safety significance (Green), and associated Non-Cited Violation of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part50.48(c), and National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)805, Section 3.4.2,Pre-Fire Plans.  Specifically, the inspectors identified two examples for the licensees failure to have current and detailed pre-fire plans.  The first example for the failure to provide adequate guidance in the pre-fire plans for smoke and heat removal in the event of a fire in switchgear rooms. The second example was for the failure to show the addition of the Flexible Coping Strategiesbattery packsas a potential hazard in the pre-fire plan for the battery roomcorridor.
| description = The inspectors identified a finding of very-low safety significance (Green), and associated Non-Cited Violation of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part50.48(c), and National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)805, Section 3.4.2,Pre-Fire Plans.  Specifically, the inspectors identified two examples for the licensees failure to have current and detailed pre-fire plans.  The first example for the failure to provide adequate guidance in the pre-fire plans for smoke and heat removal in the event of a fire in switchgear rooms. The second example was for the failure to show the addition of the Flexible Coping Strategiesbattery packsas a potential hazard in the pre-fire plan for the battery roomcorridor.
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 17:35, 10 September 2018

01
Site: Duane Arnold NextEra Energy icon.png
Report IR 05000331/2018010 Section NO SECTION
Date counted Mar 31, 2018 (2018Q1)
Type: NCV: Green
cornerstone Initiating Events
Identified by: NRC identified
Inspection Procedure: IP 71111.05T
Inspectors (proximate) A Dahbur
I Hafeez
J Patel
R Daley
INPO aspect WP.3
'