TXX-6306, Suppls Response to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-445/86-07 & 50-446/86-05.Corrective Actions:Calculations for Verifying Adequacy of Design Info Reperformed & Verified Per Procedure TNE-DC-3 on 860521

Suppls Response to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-445/86-07 & 50-446/86-05.Corrective Actions:Calculations for Verifying Adequacy of Design Info Reperformed & Verified Per Procedure TNE-DC-3 on 860521

ML20212L022
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	03/06/1987
From:	Counsil W TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
TXX-6306, NUDOCS 8703100104
Download: ML20212L022 (17)

Text

O '

?

c M

r ==::

Log # TXX-6306 File #10130

. .-- IR 86-07

= = 86-05 IllELECTRIC

,, g. March 6, 1987 Lnecunw ike hesidmo U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 i

SUBJECT:

COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION (CPSES)

DOCKET NOS. 50-445 AND 50-446 SUPPLEMENTAL ~ RESPONSE TO INSPECTION REPORT 50-445/86-07 AND 50-446/86-05 REF: TXX-6222, dated February 18, 1987 Gentlemen:

In the referenced letter we stated that responses to Notice of Violation Items B (445/8607-V-02), C (445/8607-V-21), D (445/8607-V-20), E (445/86-07-V-22),

F (445/8607-V-04), and Notice of Deviation Item I.5 (445/8607-D-13) would be provided by March 6, 1987. The attachment to this letter provides these responses.

Very truly yours, W. G. Counsil JCH/ef i

Attachment c - Mr. E. H. Johnson, Region IV Mr. D. L. Kelley - RI, Region IV Mr. H. S. Phillips - RI, Region IV i

3 p PD G L 400 North Olise Street I..it 81 Dallas. Texas 75201

f Attachment.to TXX-6306 March 6, 1987 Page 1 of 13 NOTICE OF VIOLATION ITEM B (445/8607-V-02)

B. Criterion III of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, as implemented by Section 3.0, Revision 4, dated November 20, 1985, of the TUGCo QAP, states, in part, " Measures shall be established to assure that applicable regulatory requirements and the design basis. . . are correctly translated into specifications, drawings, procedures, and instructions. . . . The design control measures shall provide for verifying or checking the adequacy of design, such as. . . by the use of alternate or simplified calculational methods . . . . The design control measures shall be applied to items such as . . . delineation of acceptance criteria."

Contrary to the above, on September 25, 1985, TUGCo Nuclear Engineering (TNE), in response to Evaluation Research Corporation's Technical Information Request (TIk) No. TIR-017 dated August 26, 1985, provided design information which delineated the acceptance criteria for base material defects on field fabricated tanks. TNE's method for verifying the adequacy of the design information was by the use of calculations.

However, as of May 15, 1986, those calculations were incomplete and unapproved (445/8607-V-02).

RESPONSE TO ITEM B (445/8607-V-02)

We admit the violation and the requested information follows.

1. Reason for Violation The violation resulted when Comanche Peak Engineering (CPE) personnel in the mechanical discipline elected to provide the subject defect acceptance criteria on an "at risk" basis prior to formal design verification. The completed but unverified acceptance criteria was issued in response to Technical Information Request (TIR) No. TIR-017 to expedite inspection of field fabricated tanks. CPE-Mechanical recognized that if subsequent formal verification showed that the criteria was invalid, the tanks would require reinspection. The CPE Mechanical personnel had sufficient confidence in the completed but unapproved calculations that the risk was

. considered acceptable. Completion of formal design verification of the

! calculation was entered into an engineering Action Item List and the l

records calculation log to ensure it would be tracked. Procedure TNE-DC-3, " Preparation and Review of Calculations" requires that calculations be checked and approved, but makes no provisions for issuing unverified results in order to expedite field work.

2. Corrective Steos Taken and Results Achieved i The calculation was reperformed and verified in accordance with procedure TNE-DC-3 on May 21, 1986. No change from the previously issued acceptance criteria was required. CPE-Mechanical verified that no other unverified calculation results have been issued to Evaluation Research Corporation.

1 i

r Attachment to TXX-6306 March 6, 1987

• ~

Page 2 of 13 NOTICE OF VIOLATION RESPONSE TO ITEM B (445/8607-V-02) Cont'd It was determined that issuance of results of unverified calculations on an "at risk" basis is not a typical practice. We have also determined that this practice is not allowed by the Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation procedures or other CPSES Engineering contractors.

3. Corrective Steos Which Will be Taken to Avoid Further Violations Appropriate CPE personnel will be instructed that the results of completed but unverified calculations shall not be issued to support field activities.

4. Date When Full Comoliance Will be Achieved The instruction of CPE personnel will be completed no later than April 6, 1987.

l l

l l

l

Attachment to TXX-6306 March 6,~1987 Page 3 of 13 NOTICE OF VIOLATION ITEM C (445/3607-V-21)

C. Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, as implemented by Section 5.0, Revision 3, dated July 31, 1984, of the TUGCo QAP, dated July 31, 1984, requires that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by and accomplished in.accordance with documented instructions, procedures, or drawings of a type appropriate to the circumstances.

Paragraph 4.0 of Revision 6 to CPSES Startup Administrative Procedure CP-SAP-13, " Temporary System Modifications," dated December 9, 1985, states, in part, " Temporary modification tags shall be filled out and placed on all-modifications required to be logged and tagged. . ., a Log Sheet shall be filled out . . . , and lifted leads shall be suitably insulated."

Paragraph 4.2.4 of CPSES Station Administrative Manual Precedure STA-602,

" Temporary Modifications," Revision 1, dated March 5, 1986, states, in part, "Each temporary modification will be clearly identified with a Temponry Modification Tag. . . , The tag normally will be hung en the lifted lead . . . . or placed as close to the modification as possible."

Contrary to the above:

1. The white conductor of cable EG123389 was found lifted in Unit 1 Termination Cabinet 4 without being tagged, logged, or insulated.

2. The black conductor of cable EG106004 was found lifted in Unit 1 Control Room Relay Rack No. 2 without being tagged or logged. This conductor was subsequently reconnected without documentation of the nonconforming condition (445/8607-V-21).

RESPONSE TO ITEM C (445/8607-V-21)

We admit to Item No.1 of the violation and the requested information follows.

-Item No.1 - Cable EG123389(W)

1. Reason for Violation

(

A search of records was performed to determine the cause of the subject conductor being left unterminated. The last recorded activity on this cable was in December 1983, when the cable was reterminated after the replacement of a bad crimp. (See Startup Work Authorization No. 15423 and i

documented on Construction Quality Control Inspection Report No. ET l 0005416.)

Plant records show that this circuit was verified operable under Startup

Prerequisite Test EE-12, " Annunciator Operability" on July 26, 1984.

l

\

n- -v,-- ,, - , - . . . - - , - - , - - - . . .- . . , . - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - -

e

• Attachment to TXX-6306 March 6, 1987 Page 4 of 13 NOTICE OF VIOLATION RESPONSE TO ITEM C (445/8607-V-21) Cont'd Nuclear Operations personnel found no plant record to indicate why the lead was lifted. However, we believe that this incident is an isolated event. Our position is supported by the significant number of inspection activities performed on electrical wiring during this period that reveal no other similar discrepancies. The lead identified in the Notice of Violation appears to be the only one that cannot be traced to some tracking document.

2. Corrective Steos Taken and Results Achieved A Work Order will be issued to reterminate the cable.

The plant Operations Department will be notified of the impact the lifted lead has on valve indication.

3. Corrective Steos Which Will Be Taken To Avoid Further Violation The requirement for procedural compliance on temporary modifications will be reiterated to the Nuclear Operations Electrical Maintenance and Instrument and Control Groups. The reasons for properly tagging and logging of lifted leads under the temporary modification program will be stressed.

4. Date When Full Comoliance Will Be Achieved The Work Order and the notification to Operations Department will be completed by March 8, 1987.

Action taken to avoid further violations will be complete by March 31, 1987.

We deny that Item No. 2 of the Violation is a deficiency for the reasons that follow:

Item No. 2 - Cable EG106004(B)

A records search (similar to the search performed in Item 1 above) was conducted to determine the root cause of the conductor being found lifted without being tagged or logged. A subsequent evaluation by Nuclear Operations personnel resulted in the determination that this is not a

! violation because work on the conductor did not constitute a temporary modification, in accordance with site procedures.

l Cable EG106004(B) originally provided a shunt trip function for battery charger 1024. This function was deleted by revision 3 to drawing El-0066, sheet 76 dated July 22, 1983. Cable EG106004(B) originates in CP1-ECPRCR-04 and ends in CPI-ECPRTC-27 at TB2-83.

Attachment to TXX-6306 March 6, 1987 Page 5 of 13 NOTICE OF VIOLATION RESPONSE TO ITEM C (445/8607-V-21) Cont'd The results of the records search indicate that this cable was terminated following the installation of a butt splice (PIES), in June 1984, (see DCA 18,968 and Construction Quality Control Inspection Report No. ET 0046966).

In December 1984, the Construction Electrical Deficiency Report No. PCV 0057893, Item 4, documented that the cable was lugged, but not landed.

The deficiency was entered on the Construction Master Data Base (System 5201, Item 10555) for tracking.

In January 1985, the conductor was identified by the CPRT and tracked as an out-of-scope item ISAP I.a.2.

In June 1985, Work Order C85-1221 was issued by Results Engineering to reland EG106004(B) to close out the open item on the Construction Master Data Base. The work order was accomplished and verified complete by Operations QC Inspectors on June 19, 1985.

The lifted status of cable EG106004(B) was logged from point of discovery to closure.

I i

l l

l

Attachment to TXX-6306

' March 6, 1987 m~ Page 6 of 13 NOTICE OF VIOLATION ITEM D (445/8607-V-20)

D. Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, as -implemented by Section 5.0, Revision 3, of the TUGCo QAP dated July 31, 1984, requires that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by and accomplished in accordance with documented instructions, procedures, or drawings of a type appropriate to the circumstances.

Drawing 2462-1005, sheet 1, Revision CP-1, requires that identification be provided adjacent to " components."

Contrary to the above, except for TB-53, -54, -55, the terminal blocks in Unit 1 Control Room Panel CPI-ECPRCR-01 were not identified (455/8607-V-20).

RESPONSE TO ITEM D (445/8607-V-20)

We deny the alleged violation for the reason that follows.

The subject terminal blocks were identified in accordance with Drawing 2462-1005. The identification markings are not visible unless the protective terminal block covers are removed. Installation of the covers apparently led the NRC inspector to believe that terminal blocks were not identified.

r tw Attachment to TXX-6306 l - March 6, 1987 l

a' Page 7 of 13 NOTICE OF VIOLATION ITEM E (445/8607-V-22)

E. Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, as implemented by Section 5.0, Revision 3 of the TUGCo QAP dated July 31, 1984, requires that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by and accomplished in accordance with documented instructions, procedures, or drawings of a type appropriate to the circumstances.

l Paragraph 2.1.3 of THE Procedure TNE-DC-7, Revision 16, dated February 14, 1986, " Preparation and Review of Design Drawings," requires that completed drawings shall be checked for accuracy and compliance. Paragraph 2.1.4 also requires an engineering review for technical accuracy upon completion of the drafting / design review.

Contrary to the above, drawings were not appropriately reviewed / checked for accuracy. The following drafting errors were involved with unsatisfactory items identified during inspections related to ISAP I.a.4:

1. Drawing 2323-El-0172, sheet 17, identified cable EG120248 AS EG20248.

2. The white conductors of cables EG109964, EG109975, EG109963, and EG109764 were not shown on Drawing 2323-El-0156, Revision CP-1.

3. Drawing 2323-El-0156, Revision CP-7, shows the green conductor of cable EG118347 landed at terminal TCA-5; the conductor actually installed is white with a black stripe. This drawing also showed the orange conductor of cable EG130012 landed at terminal TCA-7; the conductor physically installed was black from cable EG118347A. There was no " cloud" on the drawing to indicate that this was a design change.

4. Drawing 2323-El-0172, sheet 17, Revision CP-4, did not identify the color of the conductor to be landed at TB2-31 (445/8607-V-22).

RESPONSE TO ITEM E (445/8607-V-22)

We admit the violation and the requested information follows.

1. Reason for Violation The violation was caused by unrelated oversights by drafting / design and engineering personnel.

For clarity in the following discussions, the drawing errors are numbered in accordance with the numbers used in the Notice of Violation. Errors 3.a and 3.b refer to the two errors stated in item 3 of the Notice of Violation.

E l

~

l Attachment to TXX-6306 March 6, 1987 l

Page 8 of- 13 : i l

NOTICE OF VIOLATION .

RESPONSE TO ITEM E'(445/8607-V-22) Cont'd  ;

Errors 1 and 4 on drawing 2323-El-0172 were a result of transferring information from a poor quality original to a mylar document. In the-reproduction process, some of the alphanumeric characters on the original l did not carry over onto the mylar.

Error 2 on drawing 2323-El-0156 was due to an inadvertent. incomplete incorporation of a~DCA. When DCA-15484, Rev. 3 was incorporated into Revision CP-1 of drawing no. 2323-El-0156 the white conductors of cables EG109964, EG109975, EG109963 and EG109764 were inadvertently omitted.

1 Error 3(a) on drawing 2323-El-0156 was due to a drafting error and error 3(b) to ar. incomplete " clouding" of a drawing revision. " Clouding" is used to distinguish information incorporated during the drawing revision.

2. Corrective Steos Taken and Results Achieved Error I The cable EG120248 identification error was corrected by revision CP-3

.. (dated February 4, 1985) to drawing 2323-El-0172.

=

Error 2 i The omission of the white conductors of cables EG109964, EG109975,_

EG109963 and EG109764 was corrected by revision CP-5 (dated January 10, 1985) to drawing 2323-El-0156.

Error 3.a TNE Design Deficiency Report (TDDR) EE-86-187 was issued on April 30, j . 1986,to identify the error. DCA 31,277, Rev. O, will be issued to change i the color of the conductor of cable EG118347 landed at terminal block TCA, point 5, from green to white with a- black stripe. This DCA is associated with the design change of Design Modification (DM)85-077 and therefore will be issued in conjunction with the issuance of the DM. The DCA will be incorporated into drawing 2323-E-0156 upon implementation and inspection of DM 85-077.

Error 3.6 TDDR EE-86-186 was issued on April 30, 1986, to identify the cloud omission error. DCA 31,277, Rev. O, will be issued to ensure the field verifies that the orange conductor of cable EG130012 is landed at TCA-7 and that all conductors of cable EG118347A are spared. This DCA is associated with the design change of DM 85-077 and therefore will be issued in conjunction with the issuance of the DM. The DCA will be incorporated into drawing 2323-El-0156 upon implementation and inspection of DM 85-077.

l

F

~

Attachment to TXX-6306

March 6, 1987 Page 9 of 13 NOTICE OF VIOLATION RESPONSE TO ITEM E (445/8607-V-22) Cont'd Error 4 DCA 33,523, Rev. O, was issued to identify the color of the conductor to be landed at terminal block TB-2, point 31. This DCA will be incorporated into the next revision of drawing 2323-El-0172.

3. Corrective Steos Which Will be Taken to Avoid Further Violations The drawing errors resulted from oversights by individuals involved in the preparation of drawings and revisions, and are not considered indicative.

of a generic problem. Since the organization preparing drawings and revisions at the time the errors were made is no longer engaged in the activity, counsaling or reinstruction of personnel is not appropriate.

Electrical drawng reviews are specified by Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEL) procedure PP-032, " Preparation, Review, and Approval of SWEC Project Drawings," and TV Electric procedure ECE-DC-7, " Preparation and Review of Design Drawings." TU Electric believes that the reviews required by these procedures will provide the necessary degree of confidence in.the accuracy of electrical drawings. In addition, there are several mechanisms whereby drawing errors are detected. These mechanisms consist of field installation activities, post installation inspections, construction testing, pre-operational testing and Comanche Peak Response Team inspections. These additional mechanisms provide further assurance that significant drawing errors will be detected and corrected.

Correction of drawing errors is normally accomplished via design change Nonconformance Reports (NCRs) and Design Change Authorizations (DCAs).

Comanche Peak Engineering has recently initiated a program for trending of design change NCRs and DCAs. This program, as specified in procedure ECE 2.11, " Design Change Trending", identifies adverse trends involving drawing errors and requires corrective actions as appropriate. TU Electric believes this program is adequate to identify and correct programatic or generic design drawing deficiencies.

4. Date When Full Comoliance Will be Achieved DCA 33,523, Rev. 0 will be incorporated into drawing 2323-El-0172 no later than April 30, 1987.

DCA 31,277, Rev. O will be incorporated into drawing 2323-El-0156 no later than June 30, 1987.

I

. Attachment to TXX-6306 1 March 6, 1987 i Page 10 of 13 NOTICE OF VIOLATION ITEM F (445/8607-V-04)

F. Criterion III of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, as implemented by Section 3.0, Revision 4, dated November 20, 1985, of the TUGCo QAP, states, in part, ". . . Design changes, including field changes, shall be subject to design control measures commensurate with those applied to the original design and approved by the organization that performed the original design. . . . "

Contrary to the above, field design changes, pertaining to the installation of stainless steel shims between the reactor coolant system crossover leg piping and saddle blocks, were not submitted to the organization that performed the original design for review and approval.

In addition, the traveler which was used to implement the design change did not document all of the changes that occurred (445/8607-V-04).

RESPONSE TO ITEM F (445/8607-V-04)

We deny the first part of the alleged violation for the reasons that follow:

At the time that DCA 21,116, Revision 0, was issued (September 27,1984),

Comanche Peak Engineering (CPE) possessed an approved design document which allowed the installation of the subject stainless steel shims. This design document, titled, " Reactor Coolant System Equipment Supports Shim / Gap Acceptance Criteria," had been transmitted to CPE via letter (WPT-7517, dated September 18,1984) from the Westinghouse Comanche Peak Project Manager in Pittsburgh. The use of shim stock / capture plates for supports and restraints, except RCP tie rods, was approved on page 7 of the criteria. Although CPE failed to provide the transmittal letter to the NRC inspector during the inspection, the letter indicates prior design approval by Westinghouse.

We admit the second part of the violation and the requested information follows: ,

1. Reason for Violation The violation was caused by a lack of clarity in the documentation of I completed work on the Reactor Coolant System (RCS) loop 2 crossover leg, I

steam generator (SG) side, saddle block shim installations. The traveler which directed installation of the shim stock was worked in combination with another traveler which addressed installation of the saddle block on the piping. In implementing steps required by the second traveler l measurements documented in the first traveler were superceded by i

repositioning the saddle block. Through discussions with the personnel involved, it was determined that the shims were installed as required and the final configuration was in accordance with design requirements.

However, conformance with design requirements cannot be clearly verified by reviewing the completed travelers.

T l

' Attachment to TXX-6306 l March 6, 1987 '

Page 11 of 13 l RESPONSE TO ITEM F (445/8607-V-04) Cont'd l

2. Corrective Steos Taken and Results Achieved The installation will be inspected to verify the acceptability of the shim installations. Copies of the inspection reports will be placed in the packages for the two travelers discussed above. These activities will be performed as documented per Deficiency Report (DR) No. C-87-886 The completed travelers for shim installation on the other RCS loop 1,2,3 and 4 restraints will be reviewed to ensure the documentation clearly describes the final installation and conformance to design requirements.

Additional nonconformance reports will be issued and completed, if necessary, to provide proper documentation.

3. Corrective Steos Which Will be Taken to Avoid Further Violations Appropriate CPE personnel will be instructed to ensure that instructions provided in travelers governing field activities adequately and clearly document conformance to design requirements in the final configuration.

4. Date When Full Comoliance Will be Achieved Reinspection of the RCS loop 2 crossover leg, SG side, saddle block shim installation per DR C-87-886 will be completed no later than April 20, 1987.

Review of completed travelers for other RCS loop 1,2,3 and 4 restraints and any necessary reinspection will be completed no later than May 20, 1987.

Instruction of CPE personnel will be completed no later than April 6, 1987.

l 1

F Attachment to TXX-6306

March 6, 1987 Page 12 of 13 NOTICE OF DEVIATION ITEM I.5 (445/8607-D-13)

I. -Section 4 in Revision 4 to CPRT Project Procedure CPP-009 states, in part,

" Qualified QA/QC Review Team personnel perform field reinspections of specific hardware items and reviews of appropriate documents in accordance with approved instructions . . . ."

Section 4 in Revision 2 to ERC Quality Assurance Procedure ERC-QA-28,

" Performance of Overview Inspections," states, in part, " Qualified QA/QC Review Team personnel assigned to the on-site QA Representative perform Overview Inspections of work performed in accordance with Reference 3.1 (CPP-009) . . . ." Section 5.4.2 of ERC-QA-28 states, in part, " Based upon each accept / reject criterion specified in the referenced QI/ effective Change Notice (s), the OI (Overview Inspector) denotes whether the item is (un) acceptable . . . ." Section 5.4.3 of ERC-QA-28 states, in part, "The 01 compares the results of the Overview Inspection with the results of the initial reinspection / documentation review to identify any apparent inconsistencies . . . ."

In deviation from the above, the following error was identified concerning the results of overview inspections:

I.5. The initial ERC inspector and the OI signed off as acceptable Attribute 3 regarding spherical bearing gap for Verification Package I-S-PS7N-146. Independent inspection of this package revealed that the spherical bearing had been painted, precluding an accurate measurement of either the gap or the spacer (445/8607-D-13).

RESPONSE TO ITEM I.5 (445/8607-D-13)

We admit the deviation and the required information follows.

l 1. Reason for Deviation l

l ERC Reinspection and Overview .ispection failed to N/A Attribute 3 regarding spherical bearing gap for Verification Package No.1-S-PS7N-146

due to the attribute being non-recreatable. The attribute was non-recreatable due to the presence of paint in the gap area and on the spacer masking the performance of an accurate measurement.

2. Corrective Steos Taken and Results Achieved l

As a result of the deviating condition identified by the NRC, Verification Package No.1-S-PS7N-146 Attribute 3 will be N/A'd to reflect this observation. Futhermore, on August 1, 1986, an Out-of-Scope Observation l (00S) No. 796 was prepared to identify that paint was observed on the

! surface of the spherical bearing. It was also noted on the 00S that the sway strut had freedom of movement. Additionally, TV Electric initiated Nonconformance Report M-25303N on September 17, 1986, to address this concern.

l

F

. Attachment to TXX-6306 March 6, 1987 e Page 13 of 13 RESPONSE TO ITEM 1.5 (445/8607-D-13) Cont'd

3. Corrective Steos Which Will be Taken to Avoid Further Deviation On August 1, 1986, an ERC inspector along with NRC inspector reinspected the total population of pipe support spherical bearings previously inspected by the ERC inspector identified in this deviation. Seven packages were reinspected and four Out-of-Scopes were prepared (including the 00S mentioned above) to identify that paint was observed on the surface of the spherical bearing (s). In all cases, the sway strut had freedom of movement. Additionally, TU Electric has initiated Nonconformance Reports M-25384N, M-25385N, and M-25362N addressing the concern. Although we believe this condition to be an isolated case and plan no further action by Reinspection or Overview Inspection, TU Electric has nevertheless undertaken a Hardware Validation Program (HVP) whereby all pipe supports (100%) will be reinspected including such items as the spherical bearing gap, spacers, etc.

4. Date When Full Comoliance Will be Achieved CPRT compliance will be achieved when Verification Package No. 1-S-PS7N-146, Attribute 3 is corrected. This is scheduled for completion by April 30, 1987.

TU Electric Hardware Validation Program is tentatively scheduled to be completed by August 1, 1987.

l l

l l

I v.

?~ File No. 10002 a

COMMITMENT TRACKING OUTG0ING CORRESPONDENCE EVALUATION SHEET DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION Title /

Subject:

SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INSPECTION REPORTS Log No. TXX-6306 50-445/86-07 AND 50-446/86-05 File 10130 Date 03/06/87 ITEM TRACKING Item Tracking Item No. Description Types

• Document /No.

001 Appropriate CPE personnel will be instructed that the IA LCR-87-128 results of completed but unverified calculations shall not be issued to support field activities. See response to ItemB (445/8607-V-02) 002 A Work Order will be issued by Operations to reterminate IA LCR-87-129 Cable EG123389 (W) by March 8,1987.

See response to Item C (445/8607-V-21).

003 The Operations Department will be notified of the impact IA LCR-87-130 of lifted leads (specifically Cable EG123389 (W)) on valve indication. See reponse to Item C (445/8607-V-21).

004 The requirement for procedural compliance on temporary IA LCR-87-131 modifications will be reiterated to the Nuclear Operations Electrical Maintenance and Instrument & Controls Groups.

See response to Item C (445/8607-V-21).

l l 005 DCA 33,523, Rev. O, will be incorporated into drawing DB LCR-87-132 l 2323-El-0172 no later than April 30, 1987.

1 See response to Item E (445/8607-V-22).

006 DCA 31,277, Rev. O, will be incorporated into drawing DB LCR-87-133

2323-El-0156 no later than June 30, 1987.

i See response to Item E (445/8607-V-22).

1

• Item Types: EA - External Action OB - Operational Basis DB - Design Basis

! IA - Internal Action DO - Description Only AS - (See LCR form)

COMPLETED BY REVIEWED BY Initials Og*

u Date

• m Initials M Date 3/6/57 l

1

m z

3:

. File N3. 10002 s

COMITMENT TRACKING OUTG0ING CORRESPONDENCE EVALUATION SHEET DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION Title /

Subject:

SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INSPECTION REPORTS Log No. TXX-6306 50-445/86-07 AND 50-446/86-05 File 10130 Date 03/06/87 ITEM TRACKING Item Tracking

-Item No. Description Types

• Document /No.

007 Reinspection of the RCS loop 2 crossover leg, SG side, IA LCR-87-134 saddle block shim installation per Deficiency Report (DR)

C-87-886 will be completed no later April 20, 1987.

008 Review of completed travelers on the other RCS 1, 2, 3, & 4 IA LCR-87-135 restraints and any necessary reinspection will be completed no later than May 20, 1987.

009 Appropriate CPE personnel will be instructed to ensure that IA LCR-87-136 instructions provided in travelers governing field activity adequately & clearly document conformance to design requirment in the final configuration. See Item F (445/8607-V-04).

010 CPRT compliance will be achieved when Verification Package IA LCR-87-137 No. 1-S-PS7N-146, Attribute 3 is corrected. This is scheduled for completion by April 30, 1987.

See response to Item I.5 (445/8607-D-13).

011 The TU Electric Hardware Validation Program is tentatively IA LCR-87-138

, scheduled to be completed by August 1,1987.

See reponse to Item I.5 (445/8607-D-13).

• Item Types: EA - External Action OB - Operational Basis DB - Design Basis IA - Internal Action DO - Description Only AS - (See LCR form)

COMPLETED BY REVIEWED BY Initials p4- Date N7 Initials Date $[6[k7

Outg31ng Correspondence bec (2):

M. D. Spence R. L. Grubb S. S. Palmer A W. G. Counsil G. M. Hamilton L. E. Powell J. W.-Beck J. L. Hansel R. L. Ramsey R. W. Ackley L. J. Hardie J. D. Redding D. L. Anderson H. A. Harrison D M. Reynerson

• R. E. Ballard R. A. Jones

• N. S. Reynolds J. L. Barker R. T. Jenkins

• K. L. Scheppele

'* J. H. Buck S. D. Karpyak H. C. Schmidt

• A. Buhl G. S. Keeley/ A. B. Scott

• W. R. Burchette J. S. Marshall C. E. Scott

• J. H. Butts

• R. P. Klause

• E. J. Siskin R. D. Calder J. E. Krechting P. B. Stevens F. Camp J. C. Kuykendall

• L. K. Sterchi R. E. Camp

• D. F. Landers J. F. Streeter R. L. Cloud

• R. P. Lessey

• B. Tartt

• L. Dietrich

• H. A. Levin T. G. Tyler D. E. Deviney 0. W. Lowe

• J. L. Vota

• T. G. Dignan

, D. M. McAfee/

• E. L. Wagoner-( J. Ellis P. E. Halstead H. M. Warren (2) l l W. D. Fenoglio

• R. E. McCaskill

• N. H. Williams

• B. Finkelstein

• J. P. McGaughy D. R. Woodlan J. C. Finneran D. D. Mosley R. A. Wooldridge J. L. French

• A. Muzzin l

• J. Garibaldi L. D. Nace h L. W. Garner

• W. E. Nyer J. B. George PIMS

• J. C. Guibert

• = First Class Mail March 2, 1987