Search by property

Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

Search by property

A list of all pages that have property "Title" with value "Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Surface Contaminated Objects". Since there have been only a few results, also nearby values are displayed.

⧼showingresults⧽

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

    

List of results

  • ML20006F914  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports Murkowski Amend to NUREG-0360 Re Safer Container for Transportation of Pu)
  • ML20006E003  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Use of Definitions Should Be Same as DOT Definitions)
  • ML20006F851  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports Murkowski Amend to NUREG-0360 Re Safe Containers for Transportation of Pu)
  • ML20044A863  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Advises That 9G Value, Specified for G-Factor in NUREG-0360 Should Be Reduced to Lower Level,Especially for Boeing 747)
  • ML20011E479  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports Senator Murkowski Amend (NUREG-0360))
  • ML20235Z233  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Transportation Regulations W/Iaea.Rulemaking Action Combined W/Dot Action Would Make Us Regulations Re Transportation of Radioactive Matl Internationally Compatible)
  • ML20006G001  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports Murkowski Amend to NUREG-0360 Re Protective Containers for Transportation of Pu)
  • ML20011E483  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports Murkowski Amend)
  • ML20011E485  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports Stds in Murkowski Amend)
  • ML20006D365  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports Senator Murkowski Language on Issue)
  • ML20006D411  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports Murkowski Amend to Pu Transport Regulations)
  • ML20055F171  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Proposed Rule Reduces A2 Value for Mo-99 to 13.5 Ci.Proposes That A2 Limit Be Preserved)
  • ML20055F273  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Nrc & DOT Economic Evaluations Should Be Revised to Reflect Real Costs Associated W/Listed Info)
  • ML20006G003  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Senator Murkowski Amend Re NUREG-0360 Requires Safer Containers for Pu)
  • ML20006F949  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Author Supports Murkuski Amend (Ref NUREG-0360))
  • ML20006F910  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Author Supports Murkowski Amend (Ref NUREG-0360))
  • ML20011E484  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Us Should Enforce Toughest Stds on Transportation of Nuclear Waste)
  • ML20006F984  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports Murkowski Amend to NUREG9-0360 Re Safer Containers for Transportation of Pu)
  • ML20011E482  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports EEI-UWASTE/NUMARC Comments to Be Provided to NRC by 900209)
  • ELV-01267, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports EEI-UWASTE/NUMARC Comments to Be Provided to NRC by 900209  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports EEI-UWASTE/NUMARC Comments to Be Provided to NRC by 900209)
  • ML20043A841  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Dot Proposal Should Be Consistent W/Nrc Rules Concerning Units of Measurement)
  • ML20006D379  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports Senator Murkowski Amend.Iaea Stds Would Be Totally Inadequate)
  • ML20217F583  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Fissile Matl Shipments & Exemptions.Based on Review,Rmi Environ Services Would Like to Identify to NRC Potential Inconsistency & Severe Restriction in Rulemaking)
  • ML20006C582  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Keeping Alaska Pu Free)
  • ML20149H619  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Petition for Rulemaking PRM-71-11.No Transportation Cask Proposed,Even as Conceptual Design)
  • ML20205C665  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Surface Contaminated Objects)
  • ML20205N416  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Transportation Regulations Compatibility W/Iaea.Proposed Rule Must Be Rewritten to Remove Limit on Low Specific Activity at 71.10(b)(2) Provision & Made Compatible W/Safety Series 6)
  • ML20155H274  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Transportation Regulations.Proposed Changes May Significantly Impact Shipment of Matls)
  • ML20205S483  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Transportation Regulations Concerning Compatibility W/Iaea Extension of Comment Period)
  • ML20204F073  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Transportation Regulations & Compatibility W/Iaea.Nrc Should Coordinate W/ DOT in Order for Changes in Regulations to Be Consistent)
  • ML20042F683  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Transportation Regulations & Compatibility W/Regulations of Iaea.Section 71.97(b) Should Be Rewritten to Correct Several Typos & Clarify Requirements)
  • ML20206C766  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Transportation Regulations Compatibility W/Iaea.Asks That Continuous Venting Not Be Arbitrarily Eliminated But Be Allowed as Specific Exemption Subj to NRC Approval)
  • ML20204F106  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Transportation Regulations)
  • ML20127E219  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Dry Cask Storage of high- Level Nuclear Waste at Plant.Opposes Rule)
  • ML20205B969  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Addition of Holtec Hi- Star 1000 Cask Sys to List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks)
  • ML20106A429  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Supports Rule)
  • ML20127D769  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Supports Rule)
  • ML20127D732  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Supports Rule)
  • ML20035A220  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Supports Rule)
  • ML20128M153  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Requests That NRC Hold Public Hearing on Issue.Concerns Noted Re Safety of Casks)
  • ML20034E927  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Believes That NRC Should Not Place VSC- 24 on List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks, Until & Unless All Safety Issues & Design Questions Are Addressed)
  • ML20128M300  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Requests Extension of 30 Days to 30 Day Comment Period Giving to 2nd Proposed Rule on 24 Cask)
  • ML20127D669  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Extension of Comment Period of at Least 60 Days Requested)
  • ML20128L928  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Urges Commission to Give Problem More Consideration Before Putting Spent Fuel in Casks)
  • ML20127E109  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs)
  • ML20034F100  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes DW Riegle 930209 Request for 30-day Extension of Comment Period for Util Request to Use VSC-24 Spent Fuel Storage Cask)
  • ML20106A455  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Requests Further Info)
  • ML20127D694  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Extension of Comment Period to Allow Citizens from Around State Opportunity to Gain Info Requested)
  • ML20128M117  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Strongly Opposes Rule)
  • ML20116L334  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule.Waste Can Not Be Stored Safely.Doe Will Not Be Liable for Wastes If Interim Site Not Built by 1998)
  • ML20116L268  + (Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule.Waste Can Not Be Stored Safely.Doe Will Not Be Liable for Wastes If Interim Site Not Built by 1998)
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/Special:SearchByProperty/:Title/Comment-20on-20Proposed-20Rule-2010CFR71-20Re-20Surface-20Contaminated-20Objects"