ML20127E219

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Dry Cask Storage of high- Level Nuclear Waste at Plant.Opposes Rule
ML20127E219
Person / Time
Site: Palisades Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/03/1992
From: Stimson D
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-57FR28645, RULE-PR-72 57FR28645-00032, 57FR28645-32, NUDOCS 9209160042
Download: ML20127E219 (1)


Text

DOCKET NUMBER PROPOSED RULE71 PR -

32 (s'9 Flt 1H'/K) .anne nw io- '92 SEP -3 P 4 :14 7 9;g3 m g- ' m y -

1II.2 Turewiu ~

Mf9tft st; /1L 2M "#,..

ra 00CKi' . On. ~t' W~I ERANU' p - ....__.

SECRETARY OF Tile COMMISSION NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASilINGTON D.C. 20555 Attention: Docketing and Service Branch l . . l. lil . . . . l, l. . l . l . . l . l . . . ll .1 To tjg Secretary of t he Conunt asion.

.. o ~ > . . , .

I+am a Hichigan high-level nuclearresident wast'e atopposed to dry cask storage of Palisades nuclear opver plant.

Without general public notificat. ion or imput we have been sited for a high-level vaste dump, 150 yds. from Lake Michigan, 1/5 the world's freek vater. This deadly waste a permanent stored safely anywhere, so ve vill most likely be cannot be regional dump. N01 The D.O.E. has stated they til not be liable for these vastes if an igerim site is ot built by 1998, a date the Government AcMunting Office i

tates is unlikely. Therefore I ask fore i

1. full democratic p'rocess in the crucial decision.
2. full public hearings held in the sited area.
3. an enviromental ~ impact the State of Michigan. statement _ filed with the EPA and
4. a full cost / benefit analysis be done examing the cost of nuclear power and examine othgr sources of energy.

p &* W em

(

9209160042 PDR PR 92o933 72 37FR28645 PDR l[

--