Browse wiki
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
65 +
This is a one-hour report for the discover … This is a one-hour report for the discovery of a condition that met an Emergency Activation Level (EAL) for a Notification of an Unusual Event (NOUE). </br>EAL HU-1 - Natural and Destructive Phenomena Affecting the Protected Area Threshold Value 6 states, 'Exceed Max Normal Operating Values specified in EOP 31 EO-EOP-014-1 SC - Secondary Containment Control Table 5 Secondary Containment Operating Water Levels.'</br>Plant Hatch Unit 1 declared a NOUE on 9/18/10 at 1627 based on HU-1 Natural and Destructive Phenomena Affecting the Protected Area due to exceeding the Max Normal Operating Value for the Reactor Building NE Diagonal Floor Drain Sump. At 1615, both the Level High and Level High-High annunciators alarmed. Water has not overflowed the sump. However, due to its design, it is not possible to immediately visually confirm the sump level. The sump pumps were not running and would not run with their switches in START indicating either: (1) there is no water in the sump, (2) both pumps are OOC (Out of Commission), or (3) there is a problem in the sump level control system. Maintenance is assessing the situation.</br>The licensee has notified the state and local agencies and will notify the NRC Resident Inspector.</br>* * * UPDATE FROM STEVE BURTON TO HOWIE CROUCH @ 0427 EDT ON 9/19/10 * * *</br>At 0400 EDT, the NOUE was terminated. The termination criteria was that the NE Diagonal Floor Drain Sump level was in its normal operating range with no abnormal sump in-leakage detected. Compensatory measures are in place to measure level in the sump. An investigation into the abnormal level indication is still in progress.</br>The licensee will be notifying state and local authorities as well as the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified R2DO (Henson), IRD (Gott), NRR EO (Howe), DHS (Inser) and FEMA (Via).</br>* * * RETRACTION FROM STEVE BURTON TO JOE O'HARA AT 1533 EDT ON 10/7/10 * * * </br>On September 18, 2010, a notification, Event Number 46258, was submitted to the NRC to report a circumstance at Plant Hatch Unit 1 which appeared to be a 'High-High' reactor building sump level alarm. Such an alarm would meet the designated Emergency Activation Level (EAL) for a Notification of an Unusual Event (NOUE). On the day of the event, it was thought that receipt of both the 'High' and 'High-High' level annunciators for the reactor building northeast diagonal floor drain sump was indicative of the sump level having reached its maximum normal operating level, and a NOUE was made.</br>During a subsequent Investigation, engineering personnel determined that the 'High' and 'High-High' level switches for this sump are wired such that both alarms are actuated concurrently when the 'High' level in the sump is reached at approximately 52 Inches. The 'High-High' sump level annunciation (the level at which the NOUE must be made) Is supposed to alarm at approximately 60 inches. Engineering personnel also determined that the level logic is currently improperly configured to clear both the 'High' and 'High-High' level alarms when the sump level rises to 60 inches.</br>The initial 'High' and 'High-High' level alarms in the main control room were received at approximately 1615 EDT on September 18, 2010. At that time the sump level would have reached an actual level of approximately 51 inches (albeit with a false indication of approximately 60 inches due to the configuration error noted above) based on the setpoint at which this alarm occurs. The normal leakage into this sump at the time of this event was at a rate of approximately 1 inch per hour. The sump pumps were started at approximately 1800 EDT to pump down the sump. This action resulted in a maximum actual sump level of approximately 53.5 inches, assuming the normal leakage into the sump was occurring during this period. At no time did the sump level actually reach the 'High-High' sump level criteria of 60 inches, nor did the annunciated level clear prior to pumping down the sump which also demonstrated that the 60 inch criteria was not met.</br>It is now apparent that the initial NOUE was a conservative report that was properly made based on the information available to the operators at the time. The subsequent investigation provided additional information regarding actual sump level conditions including information that both 'High' and 'High-High' alarms annunciate at the 'High' sump level and would have cleared had the 'High-High' level been reached. Since the 'High-High' sump maximum normal operating level of 60 inches was never reached during this event, the determination has been made that the EAL was not appropriate given the actual sump conditions, thereby making the event non-reportable and an NOUE unnecessary. </br>Based on the preceding Information, Southern Nuclear Company (SNC) hereby provides notification that Event Number 46256 is retracted.</br>The licensee will notify the NRC Resident Inspector.</br>Notified R2DO(McCoy). Resident Inspector.
Notified R2DO(McCoy).
20:27:00, 18 September 2010 +
46,258 +
17:20:00, 18 September 2010 +
20:27:00, 18 September 2010 +
This is a one-hour report for the discover … This is a one-hour report for the discovery of a condition that met an Emergency Activation Level (EAL) for a Notification of an Unusual Event (NOUE). </br>EAL HU-1 - Natural and Destructive Phenomena Affecting the Protected Area Threshold Value 6 states, 'Exceed Max Normal Operating Values specified in EOP 31 EO-EOP-014-1 SC - Secondary Containment Control Table 5 Secondary Containment Operating Water Levels.'</br>Plant Hatch Unit 1 declared a NOUE on 9/18/10 at 1627 based on HU-1 Natural and Destructive Phenomena Affecting the Protected Area due to exceeding the Max Normal Operating Value for the Reactor Building NE Diagonal Floor Drain Sump. At 1615, both the Level High and Level High-High annunciators alarmed. Water has not overflowed the sump. However, due to its design, it is not possible to immediately visually confirm the sump level. The sump pumps were not running and would not run with their switches in START indicating either: (1) there is no water in the sump, (2) both pumps are OOC (Out of Commission), or (3) there is a problem in the sump level control system. Maintenance is assessing the situation.</br>The licensee has notified the state and local agencies and will notify the NRC Resident Inspector.</br>* * * UPDATE FROM STEVE BURTON TO HOWIE CROUCH @ 0427 EDT ON 9/19/10 * * *</br>At 0400 EDT, the NOUE was terminated. The termination criteria was that the NE Diagonal Floor Drain Sump level was in its normal operating range with no abnormal sump in-leakage detected. Compensatory measures are in place to measure level in the sump. An investigation into the abnormal level indication is still in progress.</br>The licensee will be notifying state and local authorities as well as the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified R2DO (Henson), IRD (Gott), NRR EO (Howe), DHS (Inser) and FEMA (Via).</br>* * * RETRACTION FROM STEVE BURTON TO JOE O'HARA AT 1533 EDT ON 10/7/10 * * * </br>On September 18, 2010, a notification, Event Number 46258, was submitted to the NRC to report a circumstance at Plant Hatch Unit 1 which appeared to be a 'High-High' reactor building sump level alarm. Such an alarm would meet the designated Emergency Activation Level (EAL) for a Notification of an Unusual Event (NOUE). On the day of the event, it was thought that receipt of both the 'High' and 'High-High' level annunciators for the reactor building northeast diagonal floor drain sump was indicative of the sump level having reached its maximum normal operating level, and a NOUE was made.</br>During a subsequent Investigation, engineering personnel determined that the 'High' and 'High-High' level switches for this sump are wired such that both alarms are actuated concurrently when the 'High' level in the sump is reached at approximately 52 Inches. The 'High-High' sump level annunciation (the level at which the NOUE must be made) Is supposed to alarm at approximately 60 inches. Engineering personnel also determined that the level logic is currently improperly configured to clear both the 'High' and 'High-High' level alarms when the sump level rises to 60 inches.</br>The initial 'High' and 'High-High' level alarms in the main control room were received at approximately 1615 EDT on September 18, 2010. At that time the sump level would have reached an actual level of approximately 51 inches (albeit with a false indication of approximately 60 inches due to the configuration error noted above) based on the setpoint at which this alarm occurs. The normal leakage into this sump at the time of this event was at a rate of approximately 1 inch per hour. The sump pumps were started at approximately 1800 EDT to pump down the sump. This action resulted in a maximum actual sump level of approximately 53.5 inches, assuming the normal leakage into the sump was occurring during this period. At no time did the sump level actually reach the 'High-High' sump level criteria of 60 inches, nor did the annunciated level clear prior to pumping down the sump which also demonstrated that the 60 inch criteria was not met.</br>It is now apparent that the initial NOUE was a conservative report that was properly made based on the information available to the operators at the time. The subsequent investigation provided additional information regarding actual sump level conditions including information that both 'High' and 'High-High' alarms annunciate at the 'High' sump level and would have cleared had the 'High-High' level been reached. Since the 'High-High' sump maximum normal operating level of 60 inches was never reached during this event, the determination has been made that the EAL was not appropriate given the actual sump conditions, thereby making the event non-reportable and an NOUE unnecessary. </br>Based on the preceding Information, Southern Nuclear Company (SNC) hereby provides notification that Event Number 46256 is retracted.</br>The licensee will notify the NRC Resident Inspector.</br>Notified R2DO(McCoy). Resident Inspector.
Notified R2DO(McCoy).
Has query"Has query" is a predefined property that represents meta information (in form of a <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Subobject">subobject</a>) about individual queries and is provided by <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Special_properties">Semantic MediaWiki</a>.
65 +
00:00:00, 7 October 2010 +
Modification date"Modification date" is a predefined property that corresponds to the date of the last modification of a subject and is provided by <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Special_properties">Semantic MediaWiki</a>.
02:08:41, 2 March 2018 +
17:20:00, 18 September 2010 +
true +
false +
-0.13 d (-3.12 hours, -0.0186 weeks, -0.00427 months) +
20:27:00, 18 September 2010 +
URL"URL" is a <a href="/Special:Types/URL" title="Special:Types/URL">type</a> and predefined property provided by <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Special_properties">Semantic MediaWiki</a> to represent URI/URL values.