Semantic search
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Issue date | Title | Topic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ML20198Q848 | 15 January 1998 | Comment Opposing PRM 50-63A by Pg Crane Amending Petition for Rulemaking Re Use of Potassium Iode | |
| ML20198P746 | 11 January 1998 | Comment on Petition for Rulemaking PRM 50-63A Re Aftermath of Nuclear Meltdown at San Onofre NPP & Possibility of Nuclear Emergency Caused by Navy Proposed Mixed Waste Facility & Plans to Homeport Nuclear Carriers in San Diego | |
| ML20138K072 | 2 May 1997 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Physical Protection of Plants & Matls | |
| ML20091R565 | 31 August 1995 | Comment on Review of Revised NRC SALP Program.Recommends That SALP Assessment Process Either Be Abandoned or Justified as within Authority of NRC Through Appropriate Rulemaking | Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance |
| ML20058E015 | 14 November 1993 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Exemptions in Accident Insurance for Nuclear Power Plants Prematurely Shut Down | |
| ML20056G335 | 27 August 1993 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Review of 10CFR2.206 Process | |
| ML20046A919 | 19 July 1993 | Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171 Re NRC Fee Policy. Opposes Rule | |
| ML20044D355 | 13 May 1993 | Comment on Draft Insp Procedure 38703, Commercial Grade Procurement Insp. Believes Appropriate Application of NRC Endorsed Stds to Critical Characteristics Remains Responsibility of Licensee Re Engineering Judgement | Commercial Grade Dedication |
| ML20055F000 | 20 June 1990 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operator Licenses. Proposed Rule Unnecessary & Can Only Adversely Impact Safe Operation of Nuclear Power Facilities by Negatively Affecting Morale of Licensed Operators | |
| ML20195H322 | 12 November 1988 | Requests 90-day Extension to Submit Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Issue | Fitness for Duty |
| ML20195H175 | 12 November 1988 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Unannounced Random Tests for Drug Use Should Not Be Part of Program | Fitness for Duty |
| ML20195H161 | 12 November 1988 | Requests 90-day Extension of Public Comment Period for Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Issue for Nuclear Power Plant Workers | Fitness for Duty |
| ML20195G988 | 12 November 1988 | Requests 90-day Extension in Order to Submit Public Comment on 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program | Fitness for Duty |
| ML20206D753 | 8 November 1988 | Requests Extension of Comment Period for 10CFR26 Re Random Drug Test Issue for Nuclear Power Plants.Period Provided Inadequate as Fr Notice Just Received | |
| ML20204F029 | 6 October 1988 | Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Drugs in Nuclear Workplaces |