Letter Sequence Response to RAI |
---|
TAC:MF1958, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control - RITSTF Initiative 5B (Approved, Closed) |
|
MONTHYEARSBK-L-13071, License Amendment Request 13-032013-05-28028 May 2013 License Amendment Request 13-03 Project stage: Request ML13206A0482013-08-12012 August 2013 1, Acceptance Letter Regarding License Amendment Request 13-03, Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Risk-Informed Justifications for Relocation of Specific Frequency Requirements to a Licensee Controlled.. Project stage: Acceptance Review ML13338A1412013-12-11011 December 2013 Request for Additional Information for License Amendment Request 13-03, Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Risk-Informed Justifications for Relocation of Specific Frequency Requirements to a Licensee Cont Project stage: RAI SBK-L-14007, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request 13-03, Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Risk-Informed Justifications for the Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency...2014-01-29029 January 2014 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request 13-03, Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Risk-Informed Justifications for the Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency... Project stage: Response to RAI ML14065A2642014-03-13013 March 2014 Request for Additional Information for License Amendment Request 13-03, Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Risk-Informed Justifications for Relocation of Specific Frequency Requirements to a Licensee-Controlled Program Project stage: RAI SBK-L-14056, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request 13-03, Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Risk-Informed Justifications for the Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency...2014-03-26026 March 2014 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request 13-03, Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Risk-Informed Justifications for the Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency... Project stage: Response to RAI ML13212A0692014-07-24024 July 2014 Issuance of Amendment Regarding the Risk-Informed Justifications for the Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency Requirements to a Licensee Controlled Program Project stage: Approval 2014-01-29
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:Letter type:SBK
MONTHYEARSBK-L-23053, Radiological Emergency Plan (Ssrep), Revision 802023-06-22022 June 2023 Radiological Emergency Plan (Ssrep), Revision 80 SBK-L-23031, 2022 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report2023-04-28028 April 2023 2022 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report SBK-L-23044, 2022 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report2023-04-28028 April 2023 2022 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report SBK-L-23033, 2022 Annual Environmental Operating Report2023-04-11011 April 2023 2022 Annual Environmental Operating Report SBK-L-22093, 75 Day and 150 Day Submittal Letters2022-12-0101 December 2022 75 Day and 150 Day Submittal Letters SBK-L-22113, Radiological Emergency Plan (Ssrep), Revision 792022-11-16016 November 2022 Radiological Emergency Plan (Ssrep), Revision 79 SBK-L-22114, Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (Isfsi), Cask Registration2022-11-0909 November 2022 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (Isfsi), Cask Registration SBK-L-22112, Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Cask Registration2022-11-0303 November 2022 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Cask Registration SBK-L-22094, Relief Request 4RA-22-001, Proposed Alternative in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(2)2022-10-26026 October 2022 Relief Request 4RA-22-001, Proposed Alternative in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(2) SBK-L-22105, Supplement to 2021 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report2022-10-24024 October 2022 Supplement to 2021 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report SBK-L-22103, 5 to the Physical Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan and Safeguards Contingency Plan2022-10-12012 October 2022 5 to the Physical Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan and Safeguards Contingency Plan SBK-L-22102, Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Cask Registration2022-10-0606 October 2022 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Cask Registration SBK-L-22080, Submittal of 10 CFR 72.48 Report of Changes, Tests and Experiments for August 2020 to July 20222022-08-12012 August 2022 Submittal of 10 CFR 72.48 Report of Changes, Tests and Experiments for August 2020 to July 2022 SBK-L-22054, SBK-L-22054 - License Amendment Request 22-01, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-577, Revised Frequencies for Steam Generator Tube Inspections2022-06-0909 June 2022 SBK-L-22054 - License Amendment Request 22-01, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-577, Revised Frequencies for Steam Generator Tube Inspections SBK-L-22044, 2021 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report2022-04-29029 April 2022 2021 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report SBK-L-22036, Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report2022-04-25025 April 2022 Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report SBK-L-22040, Radiological Emergency Plan (Ssrep), Revision 7822022-04-20020 April 2022 Radiological Emergency Plan (Ssrep), Revision 782 SBK-L-22024, Response to Request for Additional Information (Raj) Regarding License Amendment Request 21-01, Revise 120-Volt AC Vital Instrument Panel Requirements2022-03-0707 March 2022 Response to Request for Additional Information (Raj) Regarding License Amendment Request 21-01, Revise 120-Volt AC Vital Instrument Panel Requirements SBK-L-22003, Inservice Inspection Examination Report2022-01-24024 January 2022 Inservice Inspection Examination Report SBK-L-21126, Fourth 10 Year Interval - Inservice Inspection (ISI) Program Plan2022-01-0404 January 2022 Fourth 10 Year Interval - Inservice Inspection (ISI) Program Plan SBK-L-21135, Submittal of Changes to the Seabrook Station Technical Specification Bases2021-12-29029 December 2021 Submittal of Changes to the Seabrook Station Technical Specification Bases SBK-L-21108, Core Operating Limits Report for Cycle 222021-11-0404 November 2021 Core Operating Limits Report for Cycle 22 SBK-L-21106, Transmittal of WCAP-18607-NP, Analysis of Capsule X from the NextEra Energy Seabrook Unit 1 Reactor Vessel Radiation Surveillance Program2021-09-30030 September 2021 Transmittal of WCAP-18607-NP, Analysis of Capsule X from the NextEra Energy Seabrook Unit 1 Reactor Vessel Radiation Surveillance Program SBK-L-21105, Withdrawal of Emergency License Amendment Request 21-02, Service Water System I Ultimate Heat Sink One-Time Allowed Outage Time (AOT) Extension2021-09-27027 September 2021 Withdrawal of Emergency License Amendment Request 21-02, Service Water System I Ultimate Heat Sink One-Time Allowed Outage Time (AOT) Extension SBK-L-21103, Request for Exercise of Enforcement Discretion2021-09-25025 September 2021 Request for Exercise of Enforcement Discretion SBK-L-21104, Emergency License Amendment Request 21-02, Service Water System I Ultimate Heat Sink Onetime Allowed Outage Time (AOT) Extension2021-09-25025 September 2021 Emergency License Amendment Request 21-02, Service Water System I Ultimate Heat Sink Onetime Allowed Outage Time (AOT) Extension SBK-L-21098, Supplement to License Amendment Request 21-01, Revise 120-Volt AC Vital Instrument Panel Requirements2021-09-22022 September 2021 Supplement to License Amendment Request 21-01, Revise 120-Volt AC Vital Instrument Panel Requirements SBK-L-21083, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC - Relief Request 3IR-18 and 3IR-19 for End of Third 10-Year ISI Interval for Examinations with Limited Coverage2021-08-18018 August 2021 NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC - Relief Request 3IR-18 and 3IR-19 for End of Third 10-Year ISI Interval for Examinations with Limited Coverage SBK-L-21067, License Amendment Request 21-01, Revise 120-Volt AC Vital Instrument Panel Requirements2021-07-21021 July 2021 License Amendment Request 21-01, Revise 120-Volt AC Vital Instrument Panel Requirements SBK-L-21049, Revision to Updated Final Response to NRC Generic Letter 2004-022021-06-24024 June 2021 Revision to Updated Final Response to NRC Generic Letter 2004-02 SBK-L-21056, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Seabrook Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report Review References:2021-05-20020 May 2021 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Seabrook Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report Review References: SBK-L-21045, Submittal of 2020 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report2021-04-30030 April 2021 Submittal of 2020 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report SBK-L-21044, 2020 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report2021-04-30030 April 2021 2020 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report SBK-L-21042, Response to RIS 2021-01 Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations2021-04-22022 April 2021 Response to RIS 2021-01 Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations SBK-L-21033, Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI) Regarding License Amendment Request (LAR) 20-02, Resolve Non-Conservative Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor (Fo(Z)) Requirements2021-03-24024 March 2021 Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI) Regarding License Amendment Request (LAR) 20-02, Resolve Non-Conservative Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor (Fo(Z)) Requirements SBK-L-21023, Radiological Emergency Plan (Ssrep), Revision 772021-03-0404 March 2021 Radiological Emergency Plan (Ssrep), Revision 77 SBK-L-20154, Submittal of Changes to the Seabrook Station Technical Specification Bases2020-12-22022 December 2020 Submittal of Changes to the Seabrook Station Technical Specification Bases SBK-L-20149, Response to Request for Additional Information in Respect to One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 73, Appendix B, Section VI, Subsection C.3.(I)(1) Regarding Annual Force-on-Force (FOF) Exercises, Due to Covid 19 Pandemic2020-12-0808 December 2020 Response to Request for Additional Information in Respect to One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 73, Appendix B, Section VI, Subsection C.3.(I)(1) Regarding Annual Force-on-Force (FOF) Exercises, Due to Covid 19 Pandemic SBK-L-20146, One-Time Exemption Request for the Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix E. IV.F.2.b and IV.F.2.c2020-12-0303 December 2020 One-Time Exemption Request for the Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix E. IV.F.2.b and IV.F.2.c SBK-L-20144, Request for a One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 73, Appendix B, Section VI Subsection C.3.(1)(1) Regarding Annual Force-on-Force (FOF) Exercises, Due to Covid 19 Pandemic2020-11-23023 November 2020 Request for a One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 73, Appendix B, Section VI Subsection C.3.(1)(1) Regarding Annual Force-on-Force (FOF) Exercises, Due to Covid 19 Pandemic SBK-L-20143, Withdrawal of Exemption Request Supporting Updated Final Response to NRC Generic Letter 004-022020-11-19019 November 2020 Withdrawal of Exemption Request Supporting Updated Final Response to NRC Generic Letter 004-02 SBK-L-20132, Fourth Interval Inservice Testing (IST) Program2020-10-21021 October 2020 Fourth Interval Inservice Testing (IST) Program SBK-L-20127, Generator Tube Inspection Report2020-10-20020 October 2020 Generator Tube Inspection Report SBK-L-20117, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Technical Specification 3/4.8.1 for a One-Time Extension of Allowed Outage Time License Amendment Request2020-09-23023 September 2020 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Technical Specification 3/4.8.1 for a One-Time Extension of Allowed Outage Time License Amendment Request SBK-L-20103, Inservice Inspection Examination Report2020-07-27027 July 2020 Inservice Inspection Examination Report SBK-L-20092, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Requests to Adopt TSTF-411 and TSTF-4182020-07-13013 July 2020 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Requests to Adopt TSTF-411 and TSTF-418 SBK-L-20068, License Amendment Request 20-01, One-Time Change to the Seabrook Technical Specifications A.C. Sources - Operating2020-07-13013 July 2020 License Amendment Request 20-01, One-Time Change to the Seabrook Technical Specifications A.C. Sources - Operating SBK-L-20085, Supplement to Exemption Request for Access Authorization and Fitness for Duty Requirements Due to COVID-19 Pandemic2020-06-16016 June 2020 Supplement to Exemption Request for Access Authorization and Fitness for Duty Requirements Due to COVID-19 Pandemic SBK-L-20077, Core Operating Limits Report for Cycle 212020-06-0101 June 2020 Core Operating Limits Report for Cycle 21 SBK-L-20057, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Degraded Voltage Time Delay Setpoint License Amendment Request2020-05-20020 May 2020 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Degraded Voltage Time Delay Setpoint License Amendment Request 2023-06-22
[Table view] |
Text
NExTera ENERGY!&
March 26, 2014 10 CFR 50.90 SBK-L-14056 Docket No. 50-443 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Seabrook Station Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request 13-03, Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Risk-Informed Justifications for the Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency Requirements to a Licensee-Controlled Program
References:
- 1. NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC letter SBK-L-13071, "License Amendment Request 13-03, Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Risk-Informed Justifications for the Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency Requirements to a Licensee Controlled Program," dated May 28, 2013. (Accession No. ML13155A002)
- 2. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission letter, Seabrook Station, Unit 1 - Request for Additional Information for License Amendment Request 13-03, "Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Risk-Informed Justifications for Relocation of Specific Frequency Requirements to a Licensee-Controlled Program," dated December 11, 2013. (TAC No. MF1958) (Accession No. ML13338A141)
- 3. NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC letter SBK-L- 14007, "Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request 13-03, Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Risk-Informed Justifications for the Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency Requirements to a Licensee Controlled Program," dated January 29, 2014. (Accession No. ML14035A457)
- 4. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission letter, Seabrook Station, Unit 1 - Request for Additional Information for License Amendment Request 13-03, "Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Risk-Informed Justifications for Relocation of Specific Frequency Requirements to a Licensee-Controlled Program," dated March 13, 2014. (TAC No. MF1958)(Accession No. ML14065A264) e Ener So NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, P.O. Box 300, Lafayette Road, Seabrook, NH 03874 I1 tr(.
/2
'U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission SBK-L-14056/Page 2 In Reference 1, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (NextEra) submitted a request for an amendment to the Technical Specifications (TS) for Seabrook Station. The proposed amendment would modify Seabrook's TS by relocating specific surveillance frequencies to a licensee-controlled program with implementation of Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 04-10, "Risk-Informed Technical Specification Initiative 5B, Risk-Informed Method for Control of Surveillance Frequencies," using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process.
In Reference 2, the NRC staff requested additional information in order to complete its review of the license amendment request.
In Reference 3, NextEra provided its response to Reference 2.
In Reference 4, the NRC staff requested additional information in order to complete its review of the license amendment request. The Enclosure to this letter contains NextEra's response to the request for additional information.
This response does not modify the changes to the TS proposed in Reference 1 and does not alter the conclusion in Reference 1 that the changes do not present a significant hazards consideration.
Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Mr. Michael Ossing, Licensing Manager, at (603) 773-7512.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on March 2.1 , 2014.
Sincerely, Kevin T. Walsh Site Vice President NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Enclosure
'U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission SBK-L-14056/Page 3 cc: NRC Region I Administrator NRC Project Manager, Project Directorate 1-2 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Director Homeland Security and Emergency Management New Hampshire Department of Safety Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Bureau of Emergency Management 33 Hazen Drive Concord, NH 03305 Mr. John Giarrusso, Jr., Nuclear Preparedness Manager The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency 400 Worcester Road Framingham, MA 01702-5399
Enclosure to SBK-L-14056 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request 13-03, Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Risk-Informed Justifications for the Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency Requirements to a Licensee-Controlled Program
Enclosure to SBK-L-14056 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request 13-03, Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Risk-Informed Justifications for the Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency Requirements to a Licensee-Controlled Program Request for Additional Information NEI 04-10 states, in part, that, "[p]lants implementing TSTF-425 shall evaluate their PRAs
[probabilistic risk assessments] in accordance with [Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.200]."
NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2007-06, "Regulatory Guide 1.200 Implementation," states, in part, that, "[i]f an implementation period for routine, limited scope risk-informed license applications is needed, the NRC would expect licensees to fully address all scope elements consistent with Revision 2 of RG 1.200 by the end of 2009."
The response to RAI3, dated January 29, 2014, indicated that the fire and seismic portions of the Seabrook PRA have not been assessed against the PRA Standard referenced in Regulatory Guide 1.200, Revision 2.
As such, please describe, in more detail, how fire and seismic events will be assessed in terms of NEI 04-10 guidance, such as qualitative or bounding risk analyses in Step 10.
NextEra Response Fire and seismic events will be included in the assessment of risk from surveillance test interval (STI) changes using qualitative or bounding risk analyses in accordance with Step 10 of NEI 04-10, as explained below.
Background
NEI 04-10 states that, "PRA technical adequacy is addressed through NRC Regulatory Guide 1.200, which references the ASME PRA standard, RA-S-2005b, for internal events at power.
External events and shutdown risk impact may be considered quantitatively or qualitatively." It also states that, "RG 1.200 also provides (or will provide) attributes of importance for risk determinations relative to external events, seismic, internal fires, and shutdown." Thus, NEI 04-10 is currently vague on the specific requirements for PRA capability, as measured by RG 1.200 Rev 01 and RG 1.200 Rev 02 and the PRA Standard endorsed by the two revisions.
Page l of 3
I ý 1 Fire and Seismic Risk Assessment Step 9 of NEI 04-10 asks, "Can STI Be Modeled in PRA?" It states that, "In this step, the analyst has to decide if the STI can be adequately characterized in the PRA model. The determination pertains to all PRAs, including external events and shutdown, but the initial focus is on the internal events PRA."
In this step, the term "PRA" is interpreted to mean a PRA compliant with RG1.200 Rev 2. Since the Seabrook PRA includes internal fire risk and seismic risk explicitly, but these models do not fully meet RG1.200 Rev 2, Step 9 will be answered "No" with regard to fire and seismic risk.
Step 10 requires the analyst to "Perform Qualitative or Bounding Risk Analysis" if the STI cannot be modeled in a PRA. These analysis options are discussed below.
Qualitative Analysis Qualitative analysis will be used only when the SSC is not modeled in the PRA, explicitly or implicitly. Thus, qualitative analysis will not be used for SSCs explicitly modeled in the PRA.
Also, it will not be used for SSCs implicitly evaluated in the PRA through operator actions, super components or another aggregated events used in PRAs. The term "evaluated" includes the following considerations:
- Can its failure contribute to an initiating event?
- Is it credited for prevention of core damage or large early release?
- Is it necessary, for another system or structure evaluated in the PRA, to prevent an event or mitigate an event?
PRA personnel knowledgeable in the scope, level of detail, and assumptions of the plant-specific PRA will make the determination regarding whether a qualitative assessment is appropriate. In this case, Step 1Oa will be used to determine whether qualitative information is sufficient to provide confidence that the net impact of the STI change would be negligible (or zero) from a CDF and LERF perspective.
Bounding Analysis - Fire and Seismic Risk Specifically for internal fire risk and seismic risk, bounding risk analysis, as described in Step 10b, will be used to evaluate STI changes when the SSC is modeled explicitly or implicitly in the fire and seismic portions of the Seabrook PRA. The bounding analysis can use several approaches:
Page 2 of 3
. 4I 1 1
" If the ACDF and ALERF values have been demonstrated to be very small from an internal events perspective based on detailed analysis of the impact of the SSC being evaluated for the STI change, and if it is known that the CDF or LERF impact from external events is not specifically sensitive to the SSC being evaluated (by qualitative reasoning), then the detailed internal events evaluations and associated required sensitivity cases (as described in Step 14) can be used to bound the potential impact from external events PRA model contributors.
" If the ACDF and ALERF values have been demonstrated to be very small from an internal events perspective based on detailed analysis of the impact of the SSC being evaluated for the STI change, and if it is known that the plant CDF and LERF results of the external event PRA are much smaller than the corresponding values for the internal event full power PRA, (that is, less than 10%), then the results of the internal events analysis alone would suffice for the STI consideration.
" If the bounding analysis indicates that the ACDF and ALERF evaluation is below the 1E-07/yr CDF and 1E-08/yr LERF limits, then the results of the bounding analysis will be provided to the Independent Decision-making Panel. However, since the bounding analysis shows that the impact of the STI change is negligible, then the impacts of the STI change do not need to be incorporated into the cumulative impacts described in Step 12.
With regard to these bounding analyses, PRA personnel knowledgeable in the scope, level of detail, and assumptions of the plant-specific fire PRA shall make the determinations with respect to fire PRAs. Again, PRA personnel knowledgeable in the scope, level of detail, and assumptions of the plant-specific seismic PRA shall make these determinations.
Page 3 of 3