SBK-L-11037, Fitness-For-Duty Program Performance Data Report

Fitness-For-Duty Program Performance Data Report

ML110601039
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	02/23/2011
From:	Dumais S, O'Keefe M NextEra Energy Seabrook
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
SBK-L-11037
Download: ML110601039 (7)

Text

NEXTera ENERGYV IEBROK February 23, 2011 Docket No. 50-443 SBK-L-11037 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Seabrook Station Fitness-For-Duty Program Performance Data Report In accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 26.717(e), enclosed is the NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Fitness-For-Duty Program Performance Data Report for 2010.

Should you have any questions regarding the enclosed report, please contact me at (603) 773-7745.

Respectfully, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Michael O'Keefe Licensing Manager cc: NRC Region I Administrator G. E. Miller, NRC Project Manager W. J. Raymond, NRC Senior Resident Inspector A4ocD/

NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, P.O. Box 300, Lafayette Road, Seabrook, NH 03874

ENCLOSURE to SBK-L-11037 FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA NextEra Energy Resources 2010 Company Annual Reporting Period Seabrook Station Location Stella M. Dumais (603) 773-7040 Contact Name Phone Number Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml) & Alcohol (% BAC)

X 10 CFR 26 Levels identified in Sections 26.103 and 26.163 Testing Results. Licensee Employees Contractor

______'-__:___._,___:Personnel Average number with Unescorted Access 710 531 Total: 1241 Categories Tested Positive Tested. Positive Follow-Up 31 0 19 0 For Cause -

Observed Behavior For Cause- 1 0 3 0 Post Event Pre-Access 13 0 318 4 Random 374 0 291 2 Total 419 0 631 6 During the reporting period of 2010, NextEra Energy Resources Seabrook Station conducted 1050 drug and alcohol tests in accordance with 10 CFR Part 26. Random test rates are as follows:

Reporting Period POOLS 2010 Seabrook Station 53.3%

BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS "i Amphe- Phency- Refusal Site Location Marijuana " Cocaine Opiates tamines clidine ,Alcohol toTest Licensee Employees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Contractors 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 10 0 0 0 0 10 0 11111 Management Actions For the reporting period of 2010, six (6) individuals were denied unescorted access authorization after testing positive for drugs or alcohol. By test type four (4) pre-access tests were positive, and two random tests were positive, with one random test being a refusal to test.

Pre-Access Positive Tests One (1) Initial, two (2) Update, and one (1) reinstate <365 day contractor employees tested positive for drugs or alcohol. They were all denied access.

Random Positive Tests One (1) contractor employee tested positive for marijuana, and one (1) contractor refused to test after being notified of a random test. Both individuals were denied access. The individual who refused to test was a permanent denial.

Additional Comments

1. There were no subversion attempts during the 2010 reporting period.

2. For the 2010 reporting period, all blind specimens sent to the HHS-certified lab yielded expected results.

3. One Call In test was conducted for alcohol only.

Reportable Events Seabrook Station had no reportable event as defined in 10 CFR Part 26.719 during this reporting period.

Report 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I - Annual Fatigue Results Facility Name Period Seabrook v 01 Summary of Waiver Issuance - 26.203(e(1 )(i-ii)

Number of Waivers Issued (Note: At least one of the cells in this table should have a non-negative value)

Operating or on-site Performing maintenance or Opeting or on-site Performing health physics Performing duties of a fire onsite direction ofsecurity Work Hour Controls of system Work sofas described te operatinin dechemistry or c i em64a)2 duties as e brigade ci e imember, 6 4 a (as) *intenancea maintenance, as sd scrbe described duties as described Operating Outage Combined 26.4(a)(1) described 26.4(a)(2) described in 26.4(a)(3) in 26.4(a)(4) 26.4(a)(5) Total Total; Total Operating Outage.- Operating -,Outage'- i Operating Outage Operating Outage Operating Outage Exceed 16 work hrs in any. 0 0 0 . 0.9 0

% 0 ... 0 0 _ 0 0 . .... 0 2 4 hr perio d " . ." .:0 DailyWork Exceed.26 workhrsin any 0 ........ 0 0.. . 0. 0 .0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 Hours ). 48 period .0 26.205(d)(1) Exceeded 72 work hrs in any:7 day 0,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "0 0 0

,period.

Less than..10 hr break b/t C .:0 1 0 C '0 C 0 0 0 1 1 successive work periods (for 8 hr Rest Breaks break accommodating scheduled 26.205(d)(2) transition b/t shifts). 0 S+ I t I ... 4 +. . . 4 .1 I 1... I I . .1 0

Less than 34 hr break.in any 9 day C 0 0 0 C 0 0 .0 C 0 0 C period . . .

¢ C

1 Minimum Days Off Per C Shift Cycle 26.205(d)(3)

C Minimum Days Off for C Outage Activities 26.205(d)(4) and 0 26.205(d)(5) 6

• NOTE: For individuals performing fire brigade duties and other duties, please count them only under the fire brigade column. Do not double count these individuals.

10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I - Annual Fatigue Results Facility Name Report Period ISeabrook Distribution of Waiver for Individuals in Each Category - 26.203(e)(1)(iii) Summary of Corrective Actions - 26.203(e)(2)

Number of Employees Issued Waivers Analysis of Waiver Assessment Data:

6 Waivers were approved during the reporting period. See attached Summary of 2010 Waivers.

Operating or on- Performing Performing Performing site directing of health physics duties of a fire maintenance or Performing Number of Waivers the operations or chemistry brigade member onsite directing security duties of systems, as duties as as described in of maintenance as described in described in described in 26.4(a)(3) as described in 26.4(a)(5) 26.4(a)(1) 26.4(a)(2) 26.4(a)(4) 1 . .. "1 1 . :  :* Analysis of Fatigue Assessment Data:

A face-to-face assessment of fatigue was conducted for all waiver requests. One For Cause fatigue 3 assessment was performed for a covered Security Officer for a vehicle striking a light pole. The assessment 4> concluded that the individual was not impaired and no management actions were required.

5 S , -. -_ _ __. _ _,%

.7 9 '.._ . _ _ _ -::' _ _ _:_ _!-,

• 10 11-20 __:___.... "  ; _____._:

M ore th a n 2 0 * . _ _ : ._ _ _._ _. __._ _

Conclusions:

'Total Number of 0 Six waivers were requested and approved during 2010. All were for online periods. The waivers were Employees Issued- necessary to meet minimum staffing requirements, to support a containment entry for a fire alarm, or to

• Waivers prevent a plant shutdown due to Technical Specification action statements. No corrective actions are 7

Most Waivers required.

Provided to a Single.

Individual *.:2 -2 Noet. Forindividualsperformingihe lire briaedodulolos. please countthenmonly under lire brigade coilumn.Do fl doublel-fthose individuals.

Summary of Status of Corrective Actions:

There are no corrective actions required based on waiver usage or fatigue assessments.

Summary of 2010 Waivers 6 Waivers were approved during the reporting period.

• (1) On 01/17/2010 a waiver was requested and approved for an Operations Fire Brigade Leader (FBL) to cover the shift for a FBL called out due to a family emergency. The waiver was for an MDO online excess of one day.

0 (2) On 5/09/2010 a waiver was requested and approved for an RP technician to report 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> early to support emergent containment entry due to a fire alarm in the containment building. The waiver was for a MBBS shortage of 30 minutes.

• (3) On 09/03/2010 a waiver was requested and approved for a Security Officer to ensure minimum staffing in accordance with the Physical Security Plan for compensatory actions due to an approaching hurricane. The waiver was for MDO online excess of one day.

• (4) On.09/04/2010 a second waiver was requested and approved for the same Security Officer granted a waiver on 9/03/2010 to maintain minimum staffing in accordance with the Physical Security Plan for compensatory actions due to an approaching hurricane. The waiver was for MDO online excess of one day.

0 (5) On 10/30/2010 a waiver was requested and approved for an electrician for a potential SF6 gas leak that could result in a 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> shut down. Worker was the only qualified individual the supervisor was able to contact. The waiver was for MDO online excess of one day.

0 (6) On 10/31/2010 a second waiver was approved for the same individual to support work for GSU ground bus overheating that if not repaired would require a plant shutdown and entry into a TS action statement. Individual was the only qualified SY/Ariel Lift qualified employee available. Waiver was for MDO online excess of one day. Waiver was approved with the restriction of constant supervision and 2 man rule.