RS-14-338, Byron/Braidwood Nuclear Stations, Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (Ufsar), Revision 15, Chapter 2.0 Figures - Byron - Part 1 of 2
ML15055A391 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Byron ![]() |
Issue date: | 12/15/2014 |
From: | Exelon Generation Co |
To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
Shared Package | |
ML15055A389 | List:
|
References | |
RS-14-338 | |
Download: ML15055A391 (121) | |
Text
AomFltýl UMM BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-1 LOCATION OF THE SITE WITHIN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
0 1 2 3 I BRAIDWOOD STATION SCALE IN MILES UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-2 SITE WITH RESPECT TO KANKAKEE RIVER AND COUNTY BOUNDARIES
- ~nn t~
- CC e BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-3 SITE BOUNDARY AND COOUNG LAKE
Figure 2.1 Redacted U I I METEOROLOGICAL TOWER- 1 I
E
-lm O5TANCE.
2450 a-0 awe5 m"8 SI 1700
.575 mas
'050 b
nI.r Lr
-. FaA E'FORT Yuma,; RELS 8 U ýOFcw.
DRAIDWOOD STATiON BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-5 EXCLUSION AREA GASEOUS RELEASE POINT ORIENTATION AND MINIMUM EXCLUSION BOUNDARY DISTANCE I 1.
II
RIVER LEGEND:
I-4-RAILROADS 59 INTERSTATES 3U.S. HIGHWAYS O STATE HIGHWAYS 1650 1071 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME
- CITIES & VILLAGES i.m.u 1I~I, 2 3 4 5MAILIE 8CALE BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-6 TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS WITHIN S MLES OF THE SITE
N W E SIT MILWS BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-7 SECTOR DESIGNATIONS FROM 0 TO 10 MILES
N Id S
0 2 46 8 10 I ) INDICATES 1980 CENSUS POPULATION BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-8 CITIES AND VILLAGES WITHIN 10 MILES OF THE SITE
N I f1 1 11 %ILES, LA SALLE GRUNDY E
-KMKMr ...............
- r. ....
&-SN ON
.... A.
. LIVINGSTON ESE Z
IROQUOIS s.
....... I LQL.
Sm SE SSW SSE 60 mo MILES BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-9 SECTOR DESIGNATIONS WITHIN 50 MILES
0 2000 I000 3O000 BRAIDWOOD STATION hitl UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-10 PUBLIC FACLITIES WITHIN THE LOW POPULATION ZONE
DAPERVILLE L APDISON NLMUR M MAYWOOD BOLINCICERO
.i ... EN A L...*r'auu .....
................... ., O0 O K -"".' T KENDLL CO~~j9HARVY ~EAST CHICAGO WNITNLI EUE
- JOLIET PARK :CHICAGO H'TS HIGHLAND OAK HAM*10
...... FOREST PARK ~ CT
=LANSIN LA WILACONT FORREST LAKEIN COUNTY COUNTY 10 MILE50 MILE GRUNDY
.. .IT
.KANKAKEE COUNTY aNT
.. .COUNTY WSW Cl UG L* I..... S T PI.
N-:.=
TYV ): ... ... .... ...
O.OI S..... ... ... .... .!.R .-.-. .....
O e e e °H . .o ...
WS) ESE LIVINGSTON IROQUOIS-COUNTY SE Sw S
0 10 20 30 40 so MILES BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-11 POPULATION CENTERS WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE
107 NORTH SECTOR 106
..0'* 40 10s 104 CL 0
Z E
0.
0 103 LEGEND:
Cumulative Population:
-. mm.. . at 500 persons per square mile
-.... at 1000 persons per square mile 102 :In 1990 Sa- In 2020 101
- I I I I I I I I 0 10 20 30 40 50 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 1 OF 16)
107 NORTH-NORTHEAST SECTOR 4
10' a 4:
10' C
10' 0
E 4 Ai LEGEND:
1-0 Cumulative Population:
at 500 persons per square mile
. ... . at 1000 persons per square mile 102 -.
.. :In 1990
_In 2020 lW = I I I I V I U 1 '"
0 10 20 30 40 50 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 2 OF 16)
107 NORTHEAST SECTOR 1log-1IV. / 0 00
'0' 06 0
LEGEND:
Cumulative Population:
-....... at 500 persons per square mile
- - --- at 1000 persons per square mile S*in 1990 A In 2020 10, 5 1 9 I 2 I I I I soI I
0 10 20 30 40 50 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 3 OF 16)
10' EAST-NORTHEAST SECTOR 105 105
/ le 0' C
=.
0 0
104 U
E LEGEND:
Cumulative Population:
- - -- - at 500 persons per square mile
-=a= at 1000 persons per square mile 102 AIn 1990
_ _ In 2020 10' - U I I I 0 1( 20 30 40 50 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 4 OF 16)
1OW EAST SECTOR 105 0 10 //
103/
S 10' /EGEND:
SCumulative Population:
-.- .....- at 500 persons per square mile
.....-- at 1000 persons per square mile 102 In 1990 1 _* ... ,_In 2020 0 10 L 20N 30 40 Distance from Milesperen
° BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET S OF 16)
107 EAST-SOUTHEAST SECTOR 10-
/IOf 105-
- - 10' /*
06 10 EGEND:
= .Cumulative Population:
am.....at 500 persons per square mile
. .... at 1000 persons per square mile 102 , In 1990 A_,_-_-_, In 2020 101 , . 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 6 OF 16)
10' SOUTHEAST SECTOR 106
- lop 105 01P 0+1 C
10' 0.
0 103 E
r Cumulative Population:
102 o/ a... a.. at 500 persons per square mile II . . . . .at 1000 persons per square Milo J * :a In 1990
- i a====,====*In 2020 10l - a* ~
I I
I i
I t
I I I I I I --
0 10 20 30 40 5(0 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 7 OF 16)
107 SOUTH-SOUTHEAST SECTOR 106 -
105
/ op
!/
S U
0.
0 a, V 0
0
- 0 U
103- *LEGEND:
C) Cumulative Population:
at 500 persons per square mile
- at 1000 persons per square mile 102 In 1990
_In 2020 1ln1 I W* aU I I I I I I I 0 10 20 30 40 50 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEETS OF 16)
4IOy SOUTH SECTOR 100 10s -: jfo -O
/ 0/
1/0 o/
C
.2 10' I E 103 1_ EGEND:
" Cumulative Population:
-.-.--.-. at 500 persons per square mile
..... at 1000 persons per square mile 102 -0 =,====,, In 1990 UIn 2020 10, = ,-T--- 1 o 10 20 30 40 so mlstante from Sitep Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 9 OF 16)
107' SOUTH-SOUTHWEST SECTOR 100 lop
/
IL° O 1' ///
a.
a-/
0 E -"LEGEND:
Cumulative Population:
- --= --.. at 500 persons per square mile
-.... at 1000 persons per square mile 10U p In 1990 In 2020 10 , - ...
- i w , , ..
0 10 20 30 40 50 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 10 OF 16)
107 SOUTHWEST SECTOR 106
,4P 10' C
0 10' 06 0
E.
103 LEGEND:
Cumulative Population:
....... at 500 persons per square mile
..... at 1000 persons per square mile 102 In 1990
_In 2020 101 =5 3 I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 0 10 20 30 40 s0 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 11 OF 16)
10- WEST-SOUTHWEST SECTOR 10.
o o 105-G
/ 0° 104--' ,
C 101/ .I 9L S10' LEGEND:
ZýCumulatlve Population:
- =--..... at SOO persons per square mile mm.c.w at 1000 persons per square mile log In 1990
~In 2020 0 10 20 30 40 50 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 12 OF 16)
10' 106 10° 10o°
/ /
- 0. 10 1 0.
S 103 LEGEND:
Cumulative Population:
- - ----- at 500 persons per square mile
- - --- at 1000 persons per square mile 102 w-,In 1990 A- =. In 2020 101 ,1 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 13 OF 16)
10' 1 WEST-NORTHWEST SECTOR 106 lOB 06 / - 0
/ /
1/
0 0
//
o a,
E LEGEND:
Cumulative Population:
- - ----- at 500 persons per square mile
- - --- at 1000 persons per square mile 102 o In 1990
___._,,_ In 2020 10 1 1 1. T--.. I I I I I ' 1 0 10 20 30 40 so Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 14 OF 16)
107 NORTHWEST SECTOR m
N 10 105 104 0
102 E LEGEND:
Cumulative Population:
- - ----- at 500 persons per square mile
-. . at 1000 persons per square mile 102 In 1990
_In 2020 1U I L
0 10 20 30 40 s0 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 15 OF 16)
10' -.
NORTH-NORTHWEST SECTOR 101-
-0CP0' 10' 104 CL a
0.
E 10, LEGEND:
Cumulative Population:
- - ----- at 500 persons per square mile
-. --. at 1000 persons per square mile 102 In 1990 In 2020 101 = I' ~
9 1 1 1. I I
! I i
I I 0 10 20 30 40 50 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 16 OF 16)
ol c~l COAL CITY BRAIDWOOD a
156 MATTESON (PVT)
+4. BRACEVILLEG PLANT SITE 4-FILLMAN (PVT)
GARDNERIS SESSEX U
SOUTH WILMINGT ON VAN VOORST (PVT) 0 5 1OMILES Ilfll i a LEGEND 8
- CITIES & VILLAGES BRAIDWOOD STATION t AIRPORT UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT N-g AIRWAY FIGURE 2.2-1 AIRPORTS AND LOW ALTITUDE FEDERAL AIRWAYS WITHIN 10 MILES OF THE SITE
Figure 2.2.2 Redacted NO. OF TORNADOES PER COUNTY (1916-1969) 54YEAR PERIOD 0
SITE 90' Scale of Miles 0 20
,i 40l 60 so 10O 10
- - - I BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-1 NUMBER OF TORNADOES ORIGINATING IN EACH COUNTY IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, 1916-1969
N 10%
WNWENE W 2.25E WSW ESE SW SE SOW 10.34 S E 0.26- 3.01-M.50 7.0
=1 3.0 BRAIDWOOD STATION MPS UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-2 ANNUAL WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOA7 SITE.
(RA9DW-OO9SIT
N WNW0%
12.047 wmE .86 -E 110.94 WSW ESE SW SE SSW SSE 11.04 s
0.20o3.1 G Y 1.5 1- >7 BRAIDWOOD STATION 3.0 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPI ORT I
MPS I IGURE* 2.3-3 JANUARY WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOOD SITE (1974-1976)
NNE NWN NH WNt
- 10. 8 NSWW WSWW 10.2 SSW 0 26- 3.0 1-CA '5 7.0 BRAIDWOOD STATION 3.0 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT MPS FIGURE 2:3-4 FEBRUARY WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOOD SITE (1974-19761
N 11.64 WNW WSW SWSSSW 11.57 0.26- 3.01-
- 1. 7.0 ALM BRAIDWOOD STATION 3.0 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT MPS FIGURE 2.3-5 MARCH WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOOD SITE (1974-1976)
NWN WNW W .
WSW SSW 11.36 a
0.26- 3.01-7.0 BRAIDWOOD STATION Q~~1.51-"7 3.0 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT MPS FIGURE. 2.3-8 APRIL WIND ROSIE 30-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOOD SITE (1974-1976)
N 10%
WNW ENE 6%E WSW ESE SWW SE S
0.26- 3.01-ALM 157.0__
BRAIDWOOD STATION 3.0 MPS UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
n
BRAIDWOOD SITE
_ :1 (1974-1976)
N 10%
WNW ENE W 2.31 --E WSW ESE 10.1 SE 10.091 SS 12.20 S SSW 0.26- 3.01-CALM 1 BRAIDWOOD STATION 3.0 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT MIPS. .... ... .. . . I FIGURE 2.3-8 JUNE WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOOD SITE (1974-.1976)
10%
WNW 8% ENE S4.88 I-E WSW ESE SSW S 026- 3.01-S.l- >7' BRAIDWOOD STATION 3.0 MPS EUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPOF I FIGURE 2.3-9 JULY WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOOD SITE (1974.1978)
N
- NWN WNW W-: 4.6 w-sw WSW 12.30 SSW 0 26- 3.01-CALM 1.5*- >7 BRAIDWOOD STATION 3.0 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT MPS FIGURE 2.3-10 AUGUST WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOOD SITE (1974-1976)
N NNE NWN WNW W- 4.8 WSW sw SSW -
10.39 0.26- 3.01-
.0.
CALM BRAIDWOOD STATION 3.0 NIPSI UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-11 SEPTEMBER WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOOD SITE (1974-1976)
N 1o%
WNW E3NE W -2.92 -EEb WSW ESFE W SW !ES S 12.40* *
- e SSW 14.44 S
0.26- 3.01-CALM _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
UPDATE 7BRAIDWOOD STATION 3.0 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REI PORT MP S ...
FIGURE 2.3-12 OCTOBER WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOOD SITE (1974-197g)
N 10%
WNW SENE Wsw
-E WSW ESIF 0.26- 3.01-CALM7.0 BRAIDWOOD STATION 3.0 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT MIPS FIGURE 2.3-13 NOVEMBER WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOOD SITE (1974-1976)
N 10%
WNW EENE 6%E W -1.50 I- E WSW ESE SS W SSE SSW ~10.051 S S
0.26- 3.01-CALM 1.5 7.
BRAIDWOOD STATION 3.0oUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPOR T
MP S . ... . . .. . . . . .... . .
FIGURE 2.3-14 DECEMBER WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOOD SITE (1974-1976)
H 10%
WNW ENE 4%E W -. 25 E WSW ESE SW SE 10.27 SSE SSW S
0.26- 3.01-CALM 15i 1.51 3.0 MP0
>7 BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REP(
)RT I M P S. .. . .... . . .
F*URE 2.3-15 ANNUAL WIND ROSE 199-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOOD SITE (1974-1976)
N NNE WENWEN W 3,.5L WSW ESE sw SE S
ASW SAI BRAIDWOOO STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-16 ANNUAL WIND ROSE 20-FOOT LEVEL PEORIA, ILLINOIS (1966-1975)
N wF S
81:12 BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-17 WINTER WIND ROSE 19-FOOT LEVEL ARGONNE, ILLINOIS (1950-1964)
w BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-18 SPRING WIND ROSE 19-FOOT LEVEL ARGONNE, ILLINOIS (1950-1964)
NV s
6ý=Lmph BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-19 SUMMER WIND ROSE 19-FOOT LEVEL ARGONNE, ILLINOIS (1950-1964)
N Io 19.6%0/ a%
w'ý1 BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-20 FALL WIND ROSE 19-FOOT LEVEL ARGONNE, ILLINOIS (1950-1964)
PASQUILL STABILITY CLASSES A D*-_ E F 26-24-BRAIDWOOD 22 -
(199-30 FT) 0 20-18 -+-
16 I F ...... DRESDEN (150-35 FT) z 0 14-- 0 0
o oo o
0 L
o o
12- o LL. o 0 0 0o 10-8-
6- 00
ý 000 0
00 0
0 0 0 00 4- 0 0
0 000 0o 00 0 0 0
'o2 0 0 000
, I . a I 0 9 I
- I "- .I "- .I 0 *I v v I U I I ' I u . I ' .
0
-6.0 -4.5 -3.0 -1.5 1.5 3.0 45 6.0 7.5 VERTICAL TEMPERATURE GRADIENT (°C/100M)
BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-21 VERTICAL TEMPERATURE GRADIENT HISTOGRAMS FOR BRAIDWOOD AND DRESDEN (1974-1976)
II L
- :~-w-..
Al m
Ib,,
L9~ ~J.
If' r
7
- 0~
.1.. N- 1 4.:* ..F -~ .
'5
/ ~: ~- L: ~.
I rk
,-%-- 4 -T I f af
'4 _ 0 I 2 3 4 EýI ~ L Scole in Miles f "b 4) -.
Id.4p L! .4 j BRAIDWOOD STATION k - (N~ -J0N UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-22 TOPOGRAPHICAL MAP OF THE SITE VICINITY WITHIN A 10-MILE RADIUS I -
L. , L: ff . .I- ý1ý9 _.' "ýý -
600 N
strip mines 550 600 NNE
--- 777777ý .s trip mines 550 600 NE strip mines 550 600 ENE 550 4.1-600 0,
E 550 600 ESE 550 600 SE 550 600 SSE 550 I I I 0 I 2 3 4 5 Distance, miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-23 TOPOGRAPHICAL CROSS SECTIONS WITHIN A 10-MILE RADIUS OF THE BRAIDWOOD SITE (SHEET 1 OF 3)
600 S
550 600 SSW 550 600 SW 550 600 WSW 550 4-
.4~3 600 w W
=
550 600 WNW 550 600 NW 550 600 NNW 550 I I I I I I 0 *1 2 3 4 5 Distance, miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-23 TOPOGRAPHICAL CROSS SECTIONS WITHIN A 10-MILE RADIUS OF THE BRAIDWOOD SITE (SHEET 2 OF 3)
S
.3* a a 3 3 3 3 a a L~.LWOIIH BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FiNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
.FIGURE 23-23 TOPOGRAPHICAL CROSS SECTIONS WITHIN A 10-MILE RADIUS OF THE BRAIDWOOD SITE (SHEET 3 OF 3)
N WNW W
WSW SW SSW BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-24 ANNUAL WIND ROSE FOR 10-METER LEVEL AT CLINTON POWER STATION (5-72 TO 4-73)
N WNW ENE 10.10 E
0.26- 3.01-7.00 S...501.51- > 7.0 3.00 BRAIDWOOD STATION MPS NOTE: UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT ANNUAL VALUES BASED ON DATA COLLECTED OCTOBER 1, 1976 FIGURE 2.3-25 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 1977.
ANNUAL WIND ROSE FOR 375-FOOT LEVEL AT LASALLE COUNTY STATION (10-1-76 TO 9-30-77)
N w 6.3E S
1-3 4-mph CALM BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-26 ANNUAL WIND ROSE FOR 35-FOOT LEVEL AT DRESDEN
Figure 2.4-1 Redacted 4 * , . ---
I,7 (L26 Ii II Li Ikljg P~ ~/Q~
I, 7-M.
70U
~
LEGEND:
-0 0 ------- EXISTING DRAINAGE
-.----- ---. NEW DITCHES DIKES P O PROPERTY LINE 3000 0 3000 2 ~ mr SCALE IN FEET BRAIDWOOD STATION To MAZON UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT RIVER 0
FIGURE 2.4-2
-I cFr ------- -4 SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND CHANGES TO EMSITING DRAINAGE FEATURES
\L 7
410 30 410 Io0
(,) : 410 00, 0 PONTIAC BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-3 1012345 SCALE IN MILES SDRAINAGE BASIN OF MAZON RIVER
i,*.*. .*j I--- I t V ~Th --4 fv A,
-VL I'
X
- ;- I.* - *l*.;. .-. , . .'-* . *-,*i'..:.:*" -* :-,L*.'*-:.';,* .. *..*":
I,! .4.'/.4
- .4-'.
~.-~~4.~
.4.1
.41...A -]
.4 - . *. **.44 *4~ - t . .
.4.4.4"4'-:.
.444.4.4 4
4y7 £ .4 ;.4.4.4~
-'4.
4
'A
.4.~.4.4-J - :41:1 ~ -. 44 .4 . 44.....~ .44 .4.. .4 4
'4. : 71,~
t .4;-.
- .4.4 PC, 4-.-..
I. *(4 P.
~J ~' .JJ~- I (P .i~ A~"~"-~ -~
_Ul
.4 *#4.**.4~ ..
- I 4 At Hl.
.4..'
I-id I V 'L "V
L L
'ý7
'~.44~4 A r"-
.~.4
(~j.4.
4&:.
.4 .4. ~4..
- v4 .i4 .
-A,
.N~ytEl .4
.4.4 4.
,.4-~,-..4.4 BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 7T, FIGURE 2.4-4
,I S. .1 DRAINAGE AREA OF CRANE AND
.44i 4... -4 A. A ý .4*f " '" ".44 4 4GRANARY CREEKS
REVISION 3 DECEMBER 1991 LEGEND:
lITI0 0 TOWNOR CITY 5 0 5 to IS V GAUGINGSTATION SCALE IN MILES BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-5 DRAINAGE BASIN OF KANKAKEE RIVER
A J4~
~ hd~4'
- . b*.,'.>
4.
k I
h~b~
,LIWOO:N...** STATION-
- .. *. ;.l', .:_
SI? ",.a-*,
- % 7 --
L AIDWOOD SAFETY STATION ANALYSIS REPORT BR ,L 4
I"NA
.*.** - -UPDATED FIGURE 2.4-6
' " IHYDROLOGIC NETWORK A M
- .. . . - *I - -,' .I*.. , I.
Figure 2.4-7B Redacted 220 -
200 -
180 -
qn 160 -
140 -
0 120 -
100 80-60 40 20 0
192 240 288 336 TIME IN HOURS BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-8 UNIT HYDROGRAPH AND PMF HYDROGRAPH FOR KANKAKEE RIVER NEAR WILMINGTON
l- i - ;
z z
z w
49 0
4
- STAGE AT KANKAKEE RIVER ABOVE CUSTER PARK, IL.
IN FEET BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-9 KANKAKEE RIVER STAGE AT CUSTER PARK VERSUS DISCHARGE AT WILMINGTON, ILLINOIS
VA-U.
w 0~
4r I _______ _______________
I ______________________________________________
102 50 a) 512 516 520 524 WATER SURFACE ELEVATION IN FEET BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-10 RATING CURVE FOR KANKAKEE RIVER NEAR WILMINGTON GAUGING STATION
0 C'j Do w
0
- 6) n N 0 s~j: aNvsflOHJ. N 398VH:)SI(
BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-11 MAZON RIVER 3-HOUR UNIT HYDROGRAPH
Il I IL L 00C) oo 0 0 0
0 0o 0
0 0 0
o
- f. (D fl) IT In J SJO NI 398VHOSIC BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-12 3-HOUR UNIT HYDROGRAPH CRANE AND GRANARY CREEKS AT THE CONFLUENCE WITH EAST FORK MAZON RIVER
0 IW 00
-n 0
-i LL0.
U.
zz
.- L.
00 W wr LA.
L? U.
N ___00 z
- ~ oW 0~00 so NvsnoHJ. NI 398vHosic BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-13 MAZON RIVER PMF HYDROGRAPH
0 0
0 o
ILL 0
8 Ix a.
x 0.
LL 0
0 z
z b.5 0
0 Io x
w o
U, :D W
0 0
N 0
0 CD 0 W N 0 cy N - -
SAO aNvsAOHI. NI 398VHOSIC BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-14 CRANE AND GRANARY CREEKS PMF HYDROGRAPH
50 570 560 N
a) lI-550 Z
0 540 530 520 500 2500 DISTANCE IN FEET BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-14a TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF THE KANKAKEE RIVER NEAR THE RIVER SCREENHOUSE
590 w
W U- 580
- 4,570 .EAST FORK S570 I' MAZON RIVER, I.OMILE
- ,UPSTREAM FROM THE
.JUNCTION WITH I GRANARY CREEK 560 1 1 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 DISTANCE IN THOUSAND FEET SECTION X-MU2 590 LL- 580 z
0w 57 4 E.AST 3FORK
> MAZON RIVER, 2.5 MILES WU 570 UPSTREAM FROM THE
-j JUNCTION WITH LU GRANARY CREEK uii 560 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 DISTANCE IN THOUSAND FEET SECTION X-MU I BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-15 CROSS SECTIONS FOR EAST FORK MAZON RIVER UPSTREAM FROM GRANARY CREEK
610 I-J S00 w
IL.
590 0
580 I-w ______________/CRANE CREEK NEAVUNTO 570 WITH GRANARY CREEK 560 0 100 200 300 400 DISTANCE IN FEET SECTION X-CD 610 600 IL 590" 0
580
-J LU 570 560 0 ICO 200 300 400 DISTANCE IN FEET SECTION X-CU BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-16 CROSS SECTIONS. OF CRANE CREEK
610 600 w
Z 590 580
- 570ANRY CREEK NEAR JUNCTION WITH CRANE CREEK 560 1 0 o00 200 300 400 DISTANCE IN FEET SECTION X-GO 595 w
U-z I-Z 59O00 0
I ~~~GRANARY CREEK30 IE UPSTREAM FR0N THE JUNCTION W WITH CRANE CREEK 585 0 500 1000 1500 2000 DISTANCE IN FEET SECTION X-GU BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-17 CROSS SECTIONS OF GRANARY CREEK
580 LI-w U..
w 0
'-j z
LIJ
.- I wa 568' 1 1 1 1 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 DISTANCE IN HUNDRED FEET BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-17a CROSS SECTION OF GRANARY CREEK JUST UPSTREAM OF EAST FORK MAZON RIVER
590 I- 580 w
w IL z
Z 570 0
4
-J i 560 550 5 10 20 DISTANCE IN THOUSAND FEET SCTION X-MD2_
590 580 ILL z
z_
o 570 4 LUI MAZON RIVER BELOW THE
-1 IU 560 JUNCTION WITH GRANARY CREEK 550 0 5 10 15 DISTANCE IN THOUSAND FEET SECTION X-MD J BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-18 CROSS SECTIONS FOR MAZON RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM GRANARY CREEK
"" * * # - ,om J L.. .... . . .. . . . .
~T~L~;--. - ~ ~p V.. -~~a~Ti - - - - - I.. * -1. * ~.j - .~s-. ~
7T a
I-
! wV ,y t !
>1 a Lz V) 7- - *'
Ly I r , L.
7"1 n E V I ZMV CAt7K I q3
'~N. ~
A~ ~4 z CT~~
s o
1% 7
~Ii~ S. S S CAE Mir 21, I -t j 1~
3 A 0 0 0 50oo0 F-SCALE IN FEET g r~*
- IL
~uj~
~~rm c~i~ j'[
- D BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
-I
- i~t Go
- 1 )s' - Eli FIGURE 2.4-19
- -I.
.30 *. I-'A
,~ 1" U CROSS SECTIONS OF MAZON RIVER.
CRANE AND GRANARY CREEKS
10O5
.91 64
/ !
SECTION X-mu2/
l4 (AJ
'9 w
0 SECTION X-MUI 102 560 570 580 590 600 WATER SURFACE ELEVATION IN FEET NOTE: REFER TO FIGURE 2.4 -19 FOR THE LOCATION OF CROSS SECTIONS BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-20 RATING CURVES FOR EAST FORK MAZON RIVER UPSTREAM FROM GRANARY CREEK
LL.
z w
(A a
2e 10 5 _5 5 5 0 565 570 575 580 595 590 59!
5 WATER SURFACE ELEVATION IN FEET NOTE: REFER TO FIGURE 2.4-19 FOR THE LOCATION OF CROSS SECTIONS BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-21 RATING CURVES FOR CRANE CREEK
ILe 10 00 570 575 580 585 590 595 WATER SURFACE ELEVATION IN FEET NOTE: REFER TO FIGURE 2.4 FOR THE LOCATION OF CROSS SECTIONS BRAIDWOOD STATiON BR*AIDWOOID STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-22 RATING CURVES FOR GRANARY CREEK
U
-SECTION X-MD I L9 Ix 10 4j 550 560 570 580 590 600 WATER SURFACE ELEVATION IN FEET NOTE REFER TO FIGURE 2.4-19 FOR THE LOCATION OF CROSS SECTIONS BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-23 RATING CURVES FOR EAST FORK MAZON RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM GRANARY CREEK
14 f fn 0N In F-0 u.I w WO 4 U)N~cyI ON W t 0 C~In 0I In In _ _ 0 133.4__ NINLLA1 ORAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 24-25 AREA-CAPACITY CURVE FOR BRAIDWOOD POND
.2
- I -
3/4>
N'.
cr.
Ch.
0 L . -9 PEROýi4ERAL ORýA4NAE DTCM
.0NTUZ Zr F=7t F W0-I p -J
DRAJDWOOD STATION BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-28 BRAIDWOOD POND EXCAVATION AND FILL
, "4 -.-- Baa Ba, a a 0.-ne. -
- ... B.. 43 -
5' U
PLAN -OVERFLOW SPiLLWAY 4.I BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-30 PLAN--OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
SECTION 6 §gaaCN 1 SECTION 7-7-.,..
BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT s'CTIo, 5*- FIGURE 2.4-31 sEGTtON-OVERFLOW SPUIWAY
InI
) 597 z
z WATER SURFACEELEVATiCti~
4 /7 I-INFLOW "YOROGRAPH u a: U, U 15
~ INFLOW A'DRIOGRAPH I
I ANITECEDENT5O%PMIF SIORM II_____
I, I JL - ------- ------ 1---------
20 30 4( 9070 s 90 ll0 I,, ~c" 130 'AC la TIME IN HOURS BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-32 PMF INFLOW AND OUTFLOW HYDROGRAPH
0 0D 0
4nc 0
x
___ 0z 0
0 (0 133-q NI NOI.LYA3-13 33vY4fls u3.Lwm
~RAJDWOOD STATION
- BRAIDWOOD S'TAT"ION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-33 PMF WATER SURFACE TIME HISTORY
OVERFLOW /
SPILLWAY---
3000 0 3000 SCALE IN FEET BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-34 LOCATION OF DIKE REACHES FOR WIND WAVE ANALYSIS
- .IrE. 10 '*111il. t&. II secy.oý 2-2 C.S.- s.-
SEcr i cx i-i,,
5ECTION 18-16 41 ,
iil~qi
- lr1-l .sE-TIO O(- 4 -:. )
m,*. - -. .. *. ..÷- -.. -c*0 4 15ECtION *3-3Si*
SECTION~. 4-
,. I! .- ,-,i "- ' 5:
-. L -.
Se:r--oN 1- 1/-Zz 5E~TIOW 7-7 (.....a & OrcOct t.3rE -
BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
~. r'~~ 1 ~ A~V~ -
FIGURE 2.4-35 iDOs.J4LLIr.41Z2c..fltLSO.0 Sb UAA*V'U'5 DIKE SECTION AND DETAILS SECTION 17-&7 (..s, Sc-*4~)
,.*BI 51 LEGEND
+ Obserwation WWI.
.... Shrry ftxhn NOTES I. Slurry trcnch depth is 2.0ft.
Into till.
Z. Typical aboorvation well detail is shotm an Figure 2.4-43
- 3. Water levels In these observation aells are shown
ýPws '14
.17s on Figure 2.4-44(2 shoots).
0 130' AppIodmo* Sacn: I'- iSo'
/
./
BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 40#15E FIGURE 2.4-36 LOCATIONS OF STATION OBSERVATION WELLS
I-Y-A p2' -
ZY -
- "J L
~, -x LEGEND NOTE C6LW-2 Observatiuon uoti 1. Avompgm"nIIy ground rmter levels low 0 2w0 RIWO TTO an Fihoobermj 2.4 -hw45 i UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-37 LOCATIONS OF POND OBSERVATION WELLS
REVISION 15 - DECEMBER 2014 Sadwc 2 ~ Ih 4 21~tr L r1?L 71' 30-- -
- 7--~~~~~~~~~ 92°I* ......*q**
50 52 5-..
Legend BRAIDWOOD STATION 7UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT:
10 Mile Radius - Highway Stream Lake Bay or Estuary or Ocean National Park or Forest
- AN 25 Mile Radius - Major Road Internittent Stream .q= Swamp or Marsh Lake Intermittent State Perk or Forest FIGURE2.4-38 Local Road - Canal Reservoir Lake Dry Local Park or Recreaton Area PUBLICGROUNDWATER SUPPLIES Minor Road - Dam Stream Reservoir Intermittent Nat Forests (Region-Local) WITHIN10 MILESAND 25 MILES Other Road Glacier Canal Urban Areas (Regional)
- Major Ralload Lines
REVISION 15 DECEMBER 2014
REVISION 15 DECEMBER 2014 BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-40 POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE OF THE CAMBRIAN-ORDOVICAN AQUIFER FALL 2007
REVISION 15 DECEMBER 2014 I
BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-41 CHANGES IN GROUNDWATER TABLE LEVELS IN THE CAMBRIAN-ORDOVICAN AQUIFER BETWEEN 2000 AND 2007
t
'FF0I--IFLiHY'.11>0-K OFF<OFEPFROMFUWS, BIJýtR 0ak,)
F.ý WEId FFrF::40h ilit- F IlO F Ol FR:I2,O BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-42A DEEP WATER SUPPLY WELLS WITHIN 2 MILES OF THE STATION AND PREDICTED CAPTURE ZONE REVISION 15- DECEMBER 2014
18 Tll ff t'FO~ FrF AVAA r 0t0 FEET AW~AY. DR~\' >AVE 0 0 0 BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-42 B PREDICTED DRAWDOWN STEADY STATE PUMPING CONDITIONS OF THE WATER SUPPLY WELL REVISION 15- DECEMBER 2014
I 'Ita 2 IdDiameter Blonth PVC Pipe NOTES I. Not drown to scale.
- 2. Location of observation wells are shown on Figure 2.4-36 SRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-43 TYPICAL DETAIL FOR STATION OBSERVATION WELL
REVISION 3 DECEMBER 1991 t*1 Jultl 'ClOOLS
- C :1 15 M :. ., ft it
]}59 to oOF: 11.:1:11 58W ne; .;i;t. ........... i :Ii! i i!:inl 590
,.,*.It.;p: .. T
.. - 1- 1 : ! ::: " : 1 olv- : : -
'T 1 *.5..;..-- ..
. .. . . -- i-N:22 589 58i i t
ET ;7 ___ ______
-A Da 53IBB a
K -
jp F:
J 588 12
- II
.K.LfE,.- -Ttl-
- .,1". .... 77ý m..: it .i.r.... ..
0 i::tr t 7 1: ;i S ~ --.... .........
.t ......- ~ .
X 987 -,
U.
F T:
X. T.,
564
- J4-2--*. ..
~~T I . 7_____________
591 .. 596.I
~590
-- ,--44599 589 71-T ~
........ .. ......I \r flj 585 I as 7! T 17-7---, :J1 5 84 X11 1?S It' .ir tl 584 1976 NOTES BRAIDWOOD STATION L Location of smtion observation cells 3. Groundwater levels measured in PW-I and UPDATED FiNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT are shon oan Figure 2.4 -36 PW-2 were affected by the excavation of a neaby slurry trench in December.
- 2. Groendwaeor levels were measured FIGURE 2.4-44 umably In the observation wells.
GROUNDWATER LEVELS INSTATION OBSERVATION WELLS, 1976 (SHEET 1 OF 10)
REVISION 3 DECENBER 1991 S~iJ. itt -,JLA44 4.4,41 QAILMIA ~1OBIS 1 :1 I ~ ' 1 Is I : 1- 1 S IDis ;11 1 ~1 1 M7 3591 is a-z 7,.
1 ~ z*IIIf:
.0
-i~f 590 qr..-- :77
-I 2 ]588~
II.
L; 4!ýz4Z 4
!-7*?K* i '!T*:'.
587 C Mr 1T-7, ýWIN 11:: a . ....
l ....
I..
h : V'
! C:
I
- - .1: .z~
I a .. . ...........
.9 im .444 %::.
a 1 .... . . . ..
-EiiiH2 m A-.E T-Ia -2:!: :7.. . . . . .
4
.i 585, * , .,t.
................ I
...... ......... 58
.4 .... .. ... . .. ! !
591.
59C
-J 2 .. ' ... . 588 -I
-5sf I ~ViIj~~..I ___4____
In 2
I..
.8 5sf U-
'j: ~ I 586
.4C
...... . .... 58 586:.:7L 4: ! _________ *I'J N Ia
_asfl I
-J -I :- V. ... .. 58 I .1:
10 It 71 ..1 I IC II 25 25 'II 5 1.. 'tI II 01 J$WA$I ICBPI,&ft, ~CI' .rC NOTES BRAIDWOOD STATION I. LoWios of station obseriolnw* m llis 1976 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT are shown on Figure 2.4-36
- 2. Groundatoer levels were measured FIGURE 2.4-44 weekly In the observalion aells.
GROUNDWATER LEVELS IN STATION OBSERVATION WELLS, 1976 (SHEET 2 OF 1o)
REVISION 3 DECEMBEER 1991 zz .L . 15 2 i .
592 -1 594 7 _,
590j~r j , 9 588 rT:: T jj~~ see co 58r. H'56 F CtT
.!584 \iýF 11-. '7 .jt t 4* .. 586
-8 -- 7 , 584 Z52~ .71=.t.~s 2 578 ___ -, 578 576 [T576 57 -\ 4L.T
-'. 574 J_ ......
57 572I 57 0..~
___ ___ __ ___ ___ __ _ F F NOTES 1977 I. Localions of stOtion obseotima txolm a WrliroI stole is different tmanorer ame uhown on Figure 2.4-36 sltaion observation well graphs.
- 2. Groulndater levels were meoamtelk BRAIDWOOD STATION weakly In the observation im:o11. UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4.44 GROUNDWATER LEVELS IN STATION OSSERVATION WELLS, 1976 (SHEET 3 OF 10)
REVISION 3 DECEMBER 1991 JA NUA QY *P
- IL S ~E - -- ~ CO S
.0-8.4Q DEC".&.f 594 5944 592 590
-T~. I 588
.. . .. .. . . 4. . .4 . . 4-. . . . - - . i ~~~~~~F N\~ . d~l~:
1.7* '~L 1 . 2 ]4 588
-4 F 4 '
586 7 .1_ _ _ _ _
586 CJ 584 41: 4j V . 2. _ _- I.,-,.
- A. V' 4 A.' P.4-
-- 4 S: j 4L 4~U - ~
.- 44.., 5 84 .
C.
-~~~T 4~4 ~v F K #
580 , -F-- 580 578 5 7 48. -I 576 574 57 04 ~ 1 572,,
E_ _
-'-- 4--l' -- 570 T 568
-i.-7. 7 77;-
T 10 as NOTES 1977
- 1. Locations of station observation valla 3. Vertical scale Is different than oftier OM Show on Figure 2.4-56 station observation well graphs.
- 2. Groundwater levels were memrad veekly In 1he observatim tmilo. BRAIDWOOD STATION MATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-44 GROUNDWATER LEVELS W STATION OBSERVATION WELLS. 1976 (SHEET 4 OF 10)
593
-AU-P A.060S B ~l**
flflU*.-
5061*
MOOC.
S ~
MAY
~ 1 J.406 1.so~
2er.,11 1 JULY os.oI s .5 a AUGU" a sas 'I E S Otfl osm s N500 WfYI*3 S44** ..
OCCR-an 593 592 A
I A-592 591 591 590 X71 590 4 OL-' 1 589 j~44- 889 588
-A (ft IkU 587 M IM rl IL C
586 L
.1.
211 1 4A lI 587~
586
.2 585 a _ "7 E 585 hi 584 .:
.T K 584 t
583 I.., SIX 1Th111
.. :q 583 582 .. ~ -~ 4 ~ ~ - -1*. s q T_ 582 581 V Fi T-
- 1,
- ' EI S81 580 Is. ol l- 580 Ff 579 340430 t .....0*
I A-.03 04046*3Lo AIRLMAy 6 4040*006 540463036 JUhg 640 JULY 0.0 0 1. Is .9 1$1. 1. A...~
...I. 579 OI[Cl[MISll*
UGUM OCTO.B #0 NOTES 1977 BRAIDWOOD STATION I. Locatioms of station obeervathln call ore ,hown on Figure 2.4-36 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
- 2. Groundwater levels were measured oveaklyIn the observollce =llo. FIGURE 2.4-44 GROUNDWATER LEVELS IN STATION OBSERVATION WELLS, 1976 (SHEET 5 OF 10)
MAI J-N.
595
- . * ,.. ,* ... ~~ ........ o:* .
1-IJ A-- .. 7 595 T,*, o s 7,
- oi = .
594 594 593 TT 593 592 77I "771 '_2 592 591 591 590 _j
- ----- -- : . i ' : - '- 590 589 0r 589 U,
588 0
588
- I i * * , I - ":* - ...i
- 587
- ....... ...... !. .' _* -. --; : * " : 587 586 586
-T/ LI 585 584 584 583 7i2 583 582 I 582
- 7 NOTES 1
- 1. Location of station observation wells BRAIDWOOD STATION are shown on Figure 2.4-36
- 2. Groundwater levels -we measured UPDATEO FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT weekly in the observation wells.
FIGURE 2.4-44 GROUNDWATER LEVELS INSTATION OBSERVATION WELLS. 1976 (SHEET 6 OF 10)
I ...... ... C. AflIL J meI
- 1. J.1Y ALIOU.T BF.FrYI'M j£rt 0cTh0 0012C 0000MsI.
5 Is2 . 3
. O 1. .. es 01
- 1. e. I0s 5.6 .0I.0 1¶1. 1.2. 25 00 .1 2.
.0Ž 810 .1 0 25 3 15 02. s $101 ... ... . .. .. . .. . .- . . . . . . . .. . . ... . . ,."?'3 .. . . . . ... . . . . . . . . ... . . . . 596 I ~ '.!..I~
-:7t 1; 1:- -Vi .- Jt.
595 595 594 594
...... 1.5 593 593 592 592 591 59i -J Sn 590 590 -S
.9 589 589 .E 5.9 588 1 M.1 58aj
____ ___ ________ _ :,J~7 587 587 01012002 3113203 0100200 3 O 320 2 3 0 I7007 586 j586 585 585 584 584 583 58 3
- 1. 11 1. as a 10 3,s= 2$as .o is :... 01 .. I 2 2 0 0 5 02 3 0 Y 0 5 I WOoC 02 51130 0Cfg Jul*e Jul. *OOhC 0,00 IUIO 1978 NOTES 8RAIDWOOD STATION I. Localeios of stotion obsevation wells UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT are shown on Figure 2.4-36
- 2. Groundwater levels were measured FIGURE 2.4-44 ceekly In the observation wolIo.
GROUNDWATER LEVELS IN STATION OBSERVATION WELLS. 1976 (SHEET 7 OF 10)
595 S~S 10522 ~S2Z I ... U.-Y 5.0500 aIs .0 1S 1
-11 10 1.22.. 11 1502 1...
- 1S2 0.
JL 1-E-10 Is20 1.
U~R
.OS 02 (lMK
. Its .. 1 OCYOflA .. 0VESI 5t0,Y202SSIOISEOOSSO,5202S DECISSEW 595
.. ... 7-.7. '
HE TI 594 594 593 593 592 592 591 591 590
- Xw"i'< 7 .7i-i 590
- j
- u: .J
- 589
-~ I" I I 589 588 .S Z 5t*
0 see IaiJ 587 586 p2!: , :
586 7-17-______________ -I-,
2 2112p: b Sl S a 0 0 5 S0Y 0s SlY 03 0,rh l 050570005 S **2J II OS 5I t2 f lt 2 P55*2 S50 PSYJS 585 UYA G ST*ff G 50 1 0550102OCME 585 584 534 583 583 582 582 1978 NOTES
- 1. Location& of station observation aftl BRAIDWOOD STATION aroe shown on Figure 2.4-36 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
- 2. GOomdusdter levels were mneaowed FIGURE 2.4-44 weekly In thes observation wollo.
GROUNDWATER LEVELS INSTATION OBSERVATION WELLS, 1976 (SHEET 8 OF 10)
JANU-ff TCU..Re. -1LC OAT StifS A-1 aUGS 9(PTC.se clOf utC~jOSO OccUSSO 597 U I. Is a.tI Is 56 2 10229
~1- -~r~i ii 597 596 .. 44;~ ~ z
+ L* +
1 4
~jilLJ
~ 7 595 595 594 594 jjj~j .~U LJj1 593 JtithI M --zt:n Nli 593 592
-J 592
- 0) .In 7 -* :, .-'; sjjI ":1;* I~~21I~
- . .J 591 C
- 590 590 L
.2 589
-2 P lij~ 2 .. 1.. i YT i:h1 h: E~i ~ ~ .. ~A;. I 588 -~~~~~- _ _ _. . .',F1J WE-1:22:~i~_ . ~-+/-
2! v;: 1 2:-T;.~PE t-
- 74 588 T
587 586 .L.i..
- 1. LJ_ ____ 586 585 40 r
'd :Ar T 585
- L 584 ; . .. . l * " I -.
- f - , [ "I dd14:
" I [
- f i'l 584
~12ti -t~ 7j~4~
- tO tO 20 20 0 Is 5 tO IS tO 25 I~EL~ t~ I. Is O*8 Is OIS2 5 Is96 8t S28 11DW
- io 6s go Io 0cO -nIs
'UL, UUT S'8SS 010 00080m 1978 BRAIDWOOD STATION NOTES UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
- 1. Locations of station observation wallo ors shown an Figure 2.4-56 FIGURE 2.4-44
- 2. Grottodwater levels were meem ured weeklIy In the observation callo. GROUNDWATER LEVELS IN STATION OBSERVATION WELLS, 1976 (SHEET 9 OF 10)
U 1. .0oas'sag 0ac55055 s W0 a *o I as 201.50so ao o50o5 ts 1 a o9 . a. 1.0is a. S 1. .0 5 0 0 a. 25 a to Ia iota 597 03 to0I aI S2*
- 4..11.4...
.I.4 .4 I4..,~t,.4597 596 ~L::l~:,~ 596 4 17-595 595 594 *594 ZZ, a:
593 "L 10=4
= 593 592 592
-J
.4~4Z14~ZZ2i Z-..
591 591
-. 'a---
A 590 590
. --,. . * .*.'* .. : . P- :: ... . .: . : ...* ' * -'. . .
L-Cj 77VK, T14 2:-'A 11 589 a-2-41 589 Z:
ILl o'I 5689 50 7-:1 .1- 7.. U . .
nfl? ~ 1 --: a-.7 z!,r*a-*7J*s::* *7I 586
-- ~ ~. :.: :7~I~~+
.*.....,,I......,.-...~ T~............. :~ysifla ~ H-1 p1 Xl::
585 a: ::T.
584 584 t
HTl S s522 aaaa soau~ S a1 0s~o 2 5:,a a
- isk Bs z za a I 153085 a IC IS *0 as a 10 D15 205 9 ID 1S 20 5 10 *oS*823 so 11 2.a I11 osMiod 1 10 1 20 8 NOTES 1978 BRAIDWOOD STATION I. Locatias of slation obsea-atim eIa are shcan an Figure 2.4-36 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
- 2. Giawmdwter levels wero mecoureg oeokly In the observotkm volb. FIGURE 2.4-44 GRONIDWATER LEVELS IN STATION OBSERVATION WELLS, 1976 (SHEET 10 OF 10)
592 590 588 586
.4 a 582 Sao Sm 578 574 572 BRAIDWOOD STATION NOTES UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT iI~calian alf- od obsrvaton calls 4.LW-2 os$ gr"eted closed durlg May are ,ia an Figure L.4 -37 1977 dus to carstructtoa of the lake dike. FIGURE 2.4-45 2.Gromdcambros weremeasured weekly in. Ific aboarvotlon colb. AVERAGE MONTHLY GROUNDWATER LEVELS
&Grourdualwr levels Imecered in INLAKE OBSERVATION WELLS LTI-I care Caffted by waelr Iloeat (SHEET I OF 2) to car adjacord ditch (Subsectlam 2.4.13.2.2.2).
592 592 I T 12
-- 4--- I T I I 590 590
--4-4-,--f-LW-t 588 i I+--t i -t-*, -- 1--- -- i-* 588
-i I-- I- I - --
586 586 584 584 LW-5 H- F-582 582 0
- LW-7 a
U 58D 580 LW-4
.1' K. IIi7Ha~z-578 578 LW-6 1ý . I .
i 1 1 i 4 1 K 576
- I VE 574 ---i- f- -F--+ 4 -+-f i i 574
_, _* . . - I
- i -+-- ---4 :: F I S. I i -
I -- 4-- UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 572~r L1U 9 1-Ig-z~
I I I Q IllI*l FIGURE 2.4-45 iBRAIDWOOD STATION AVERAGE MONTHLY GROUNDWATER LEVELS a 19-m- ----- L------------ :ý IN LAKE OBSERVATION WELLS (SHEET 2 OF 2)
00
.Ia uin U- w 0-w Cd 0 t In "on tn J.334 NI NOIJVA3"I BRAIDWOOD UPDATED FSINAL SAFET:V STATION ANALVSIS REPORTi FIGURE 2.4-46 ESSENTIAL COOLING POND AREA-CAPACITY CURVES
( EL. 590'-0 )
Ic
- 4. SLOWDOWN PIPE m~~~~~ *msiA SRIC m1~T~mJ *. -. ., TER~eIR
-192"Il CIRCULATING WATER SLIPLy PIPE DRAINAGE DITCH
-PROPERTY LINE 200 0 20D 400 SCALE IN FEET
SECTION A-A i'-6" RIPRAP SECTION 8-8 SECTION 0-D EL.590"- O" to 8OTTOd,*Q rE,584'-d0 SECTION C-C BRAIDWOOD STATION 20 o0 0 10 20 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT SCALE IN FEET FIGURE 2.4-48 ESSENTIAL COOLING POND SECTIONS
.3.;
- EM-,
@ JlAý 7 .
-Ism PROFRE AT t, OF MrE elm
_ape_
4t---- -IXL BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
-925L FIGURE 2A-49 EXTERIOR DIKE PROFILE f4MFLEAT I. OF DIKE STA 0 +00 TO STA 49 + 00
--- -- -. a--_
@ ba ft c-PRIEATý OF DIKE BRAJOWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-50 EXTERIOR DIKE PROFILE STA 49 + 00 TO STA 6 + So
I
.j I ~ ~
(
i K~cbj~~' :Z AM
'U-w-n fl~7rJJr~--
I ift =
==i--
=7 TT ---. - -
6-4LmA--:ý_-;_
. - . PH 7F77 r4 Iill
- . .. . -itm
~~2i~i1L. ~T77LW .
-MR.
BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAl. SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-51 EXTERIOR ONKEPROFILE STA 499 + I5 TO STA S40 + 79.6