RS-14-338, Byron/Braidwood Nuclear Stations, Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (Ufsar), Revision 15, Chapter 2.0 Figures - Byron - Part 1 of 2

From kanterella
(Redirected from RS-14-338)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Byron/Braidwood Nuclear Stations, Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (Ufsar), Revision 15, Chapter 2.0 Figures - Byron - Part 1 of 2
ML15055A391
Person / Time
Site: Byron  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/15/2014
From:
Exelon Generation Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML15055A389 List:
References
RS-14-338
Download: ML15055A391 (121)


Text

AomFltýl UMM BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-1 LOCATION OF THE SITE WITHIN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

0 1 2 3 I BRAIDWOOD STATION SCALE IN MILES UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-2 SITE WITH RESPECT TO KANKAKEE RIVER AND COUNTY BOUNDARIES

  • ~nn t~

- CC e BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-3 SITE BOUNDARY AND COOUNG LAKE

Figure 2.1 Redacted U I I METEOROLOGICAL TOWER- 1 I

E

-lm O5TANCE.

2450 a-0 awe5 m"8 SI 1700

.575 mas

'050 b

nI.r Lr

-. FaA E'FORT Yuma,; RELS 8 U ýOFcw.

DRAIDWOOD STATiON BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-5 EXCLUSION AREA GASEOUS RELEASE POINT ORIENTATION AND MINIMUM EXCLUSION BOUNDARY DISTANCE I 1.

II

RIVER LEGEND:

I-4-RAILROADS 59 INTERSTATES 3U.S. HIGHWAYS O STATE HIGHWAYS 1650 1071 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME

N W E SIT MILWS BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-7 SECTOR DESIGNATIONS FROM 0 TO 10 MILES

N Id S

0 2 46 8 10 I ) INDICATES 1980 CENSUS POPULATION BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-8 CITIES AND VILLAGES WITHIN 10 MILES OF THE SITE

N I f1 1 11 %ILES, LA SALLE GRUNDY E

-KMKMr ...............

r. ....

&-SN ON

.... A.

. LIVINGSTON ESE Z

IROQUOIS s.

....... I LQL.

Sm SE SSW SSE 60 mo MILES BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-9 SECTOR DESIGNATIONS WITHIN 50 MILES

0 2000 I000 3O000 BRAIDWOOD STATION hitl UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-10 PUBLIC FACLITIES WITHIN THE LOW POPULATION ZONE

DAPERVILLE L APDISON NLMUR M MAYWOOD BOLINCICERO

.i ... EN A L...*r'auu .....

................... ., O0 O K -"".' T KENDLL CO~~j9HARVY ~EAST CHICAGO WNITNLI EUE

  • JOLIET PARK :CHICAGO H'TS HIGHLAND OAK HAM*10

...... FOREST PARK ~ CT

=LANSIN LA WILACONT FORREST LAKEIN COUNTY COUNTY 10 MILE50 MILE GRUNDY

.. .IT

.KANKAKEE COUNTY aNT

.. .COUNTY WSW Cl UG L* I..... S T PI.

N-:.=

TYV ): ... ... .... ...

O.OI S..... ... ... .... .!.R .-.-. .....

O e e e °H . .o ...

WS) ESE LIVINGSTON IROQUOIS-COUNTY SE Sw S

0 10 20 30 40 so MILES BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-11 POPULATION CENTERS WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE

107 NORTH SECTOR 106

..0'* 40 10s 104 CL 0

Z E

0.

0 103 LEGEND:

Cumulative Population:

-. mm.. . at 500 persons per square mile

-.... at 1000 persons per square mile 102 :In 1990 Sa- In 2020 101

  • I I I I I I I I 0 10 20 30 40 50 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 1 OF 16)

107 NORTH-NORTHEAST SECTOR 4

10' a 4:

10' C

10' 0

E 4 Ai LEGEND:

1-0 Cumulative Population:

at 500 persons per square mile

. ... . at 1000 persons per square mile 102 -.

.. :In 1990

_In 2020 lW = I I I I V I U 1 '"

0 10 20 30 40 50 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 2 OF 16)

107 NORTHEAST SECTOR 1log-1IV. / 0 00

'0' 06 0

LEGEND:

Cumulative Population:

-....... at 500 persons per square mile

- - --- at 1000 persons per square mile S*in 1990 A In 2020 10, 5 1 9 I 2 I I I I soI I

0 10 20 30 40 50 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 3 OF 16)

10' EAST-NORTHEAST SECTOR 105 105

/ le 0' C

=.

0 0

104 U

E LEGEND:

Cumulative Population:

- - -- - at 500 persons per square mile

-=a= at 1000 persons per square mile 102 AIn 1990

_ _ In 2020 10' - U I I I 0 1( 20 30 40 50 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 4 OF 16)

1OW EAST SECTOR 105 0 10 //

103/

S 10' /EGEND:

SCumulative Population:

-.- .....- at 500 persons per square mile

.....-- at 1000 persons per square mile 102 In 1990 1 _* ... ,_In 2020 0 10 L 20N 30 40 Distance from Milesperen

° BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET S OF 16)

107 EAST-SOUTHEAST SECTOR 10-

/IOf 105-

  • - 10' /*

06 10 EGEND:

= .Cumulative Population:

am.....at 500 persons per square mile

. .... at 1000 persons per square mile 102 , In 1990 A_,_-_-_, In 2020 101 , . 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 6 OF 16)

10' SOUTHEAST SECTOR 106

- lop 105 01P 0+1 C

10' 0.

0 103 E

r Cumulative Population:

102 o/ a... a.. at 500 persons per square mile II . . . . .at 1000 persons per square Milo J * :a In 1990

  • i a====,====*In 2020 10l - a* ~

I I

I i

I t

I I I I I I --

0 10 20 30 40 5(0 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 7 OF 16)

107 SOUTH-SOUTHEAST SECTOR 106 -

105

/ op

!/

S U

0.

0 a, V 0

0

  • 0 U

103- *LEGEND:

C) Cumulative Population:

at 500 persons per square mile

- at 1000 persons per square mile 102 In 1990

_In 2020 1ln1 I W* aU I I I I I I I 0 10 20 30 40 50 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEETS OF 16)

4IOy SOUTH SECTOR 100 10s -: jfo -O

/ 0/

1/0 o/

C

.2 10' I E 103 1_ EGEND:

" Cumulative Population:

-.-.--.-. at 500 persons per square mile

..... at 1000 persons per square mile 102 -0 =,====,, In 1990 UIn 2020 10, = ,-T--- 1 o 10 20 30 40 so mlstante from Sitep Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 9 OF 16)

107' SOUTH-SOUTHWEST SECTOR 100 lop

/

IL° O 1' ///

a.

a-/

0 E -"LEGEND:

Cumulative Population:

- --= --.. at 500 persons per square mile

-.... at 1000 persons per square mile 10U p In 1990 In 2020 10 , - ...

  • i w , , ..

0 10 20 30 40 50 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 10 OF 16)

107 SOUTHWEST SECTOR 106

,4P 10' C

0 10' 06 0

E.

103 LEGEND:

Cumulative Population:

....... at 500 persons per square mile

..... at 1000 persons per square mile 102 In 1990

_In 2020 101 =5 3 I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 0 10 20 30 40 s0 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 11 OF 16)

10- WEST-SOUTHWEST SECTOR 10.

o o 105-G

/ 0° 104--' ,

C 101/ .I 9L S10' LEGEND:

ZýCumulatlve Population:

- =--..... at SOO persons per square mile mm.c.w at 1000 persons per square mile log In 1990

~In 2020 0 10 20 30 40 50 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 12 OF 16)

10' 106 10° 10o°

/ /

0. 10 1 0.

S 103 LEGEND:

Cumulative Population:

- - ----- at 500 persons per square mile

- - --- at 1000 persons per square mile 102 w-,In 1990 A- =. In 2020 101 ,1 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 13 OF 16)

10' 1 WEST-NORTHWEST SECTOR 106 lOB 06 / - 0

/ /

1/

0 0

//

o a,

E LEGEND:

Cumulative Population:

- - ----- at 500 persons per square mile

- - --- at 1000 persons per square mile 102 o In 1990

___._,,_ In 2020 10 1 1 1. T--.. I I I I I ' 1 0 10 20 30 40 so Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 14 OF 16)

107 NORTHWEST SECTOR m

N 10 105 104 0

102 E LEGEND:

Cumulative Population:

- - ----- at 500 persons per square mile

-. . at 1000 persons per square mile 102 In 1990

_In 2020 1U I L

0 10 20 30 40 s0 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 15 OF 16)

10' -.

NORTH-NORTHWEST SECTOR 101-

-0CP0' 10' 104 CL a

0.

E 10, LEGEND:

Cumulative Population:

- - ----- at 500 persons per square mile

-. --. at 1000 persons per square mile 102 In 1990 In 2020 101 = I' ~

9 1 1 1. I I

! I i

I I 0 10 20 30 40 50 Distance from Site, Miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1990 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 16 OF 16)

ol c~l COAL CITY BRAIDWOOD a

156 MATTESON (PVT)

+4. BRACEVILLEG PLANT SITE 4-FILLMAN (PVT)

GARDNERIS SESSEX U

SOUTH WILMINGT ON VAN VOORST (PVT) 0 5 1OMILES Ilfll i a LEGEND 8

Figure 2.2.2 Redacted NO. OF TORNADOES PER COUNTY (1916-1969) 54YEAR PERIOD 0

SITE 90' Scale of Miles 0 20

,i 40l 60 so 10O 10

- - - I BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-1 NUMBER OF TORNADOES ORIGINATING IN EACH COUNTY IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, 1916-1969

N 10%

WNWENE W 2.25E WSW ESE SW SE SOW 10.34 S E 0.26- 3.01-M.50 7.0

=1 3.0 BRAIDWOOD STATION MPS UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-2 ANNUAL WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOA7 SITE.

(RA9DW-OO9SIT

N WNW0%

12.047 wmE .86 -E 110.94 WSW ESE SW SE SSW SSE 11.04 s

0.20o3.1 G Y 1.5 1- >7 BRAIDWOOD STATION 3.0 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPI ORT I

MPS I IGURE* 2.3-3 JANUARY WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOOD SITE (1974-1976)

NNE NWN NH WNt

10. 8 NSWW WSWW 10.2 SSW 0 26- 3.0 1-CA '5 7.0 BRAIDWOOD STATION 3.0 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT MPS FIGURE 2:3-4 FEBRUARY WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOOD SITE (1974-19761

N 11.64 WNW WSW SWSSSW 11.57 0.26- 3.01-

1. 7.0 ALM BRAIDWOOD STATION 3.0 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT MPS FIGURE 2.3-5 MARCH WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOOD SITE (1974-1976)

NWN WNW W .

WSW SSW 11.36 a

0.26- 3.01-7.0 BRAIDWOOD STATION Q~~1.51-"7 3.0 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT MPS FIGURE. 2.3-8 APRIL WIND ROSIE 30-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOOD SITE (1974-1976)

N 10%

WNW ENE 6%E WSW ESE SWW SE S

0.26- 3.01-ALM 157.0__

BRAIDWOOD STATION 3.0 MPS UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

n

BRAIDWOOD SITE

_ :1 (1974-1976)

N 10%

WNW ENE W 2.31 --E WSW ESE 10.1 SE 10.091 SS 12.20 S SSW 0.26- 3.01-CALM 1 BRAIDWOOD STATION 3.0 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT MIPS. .... ... .. . . I FIGURE 2.3-8 JUNE WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOOD SITE (1974-.1976)

10%

WNW 8% ENE S4.88 I-E WSW ESE SSW S 026- 3.01-S.l- >7' BRAIDWOOD STATION 3.0 MPS EUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPOF I FIGURE 2.3-9 JULY WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOOD SITE (1974.1978)

N

N NNE NWN WNW W- 4.8 WSW sw SSW -

10.39 0.26- 3.01-

.0.

CALM BRAIDWOOD STATION 3.0 NIPSI UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-11 SEPTEMBER WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOOD SITE (1974-1976)

N 1o%

WNW E3NE W -2.92 -EEb WSW ESFE W SW  !ES S 12.40* *

0.26- 3.01-CALM _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

UPDATE 7BRAIDWOOD STATION 3.0 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REI PORT MP S ...

FIGURE 2.3-12 OCTOBER WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOOD SITE (1974-197g)

N 10%

WNW SENE Wsw

-E WSW ESIF 0.26- 3.01-CALM7.0 BRAIDWOOD STATION 3.0 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT MIPS FIGURE 2.3-13 NOVEMBER WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOOD SITE (1974-1976)

N 10%

WNW EENE 6%E W -1.50 I- E WSW ESE SS W SSE SSW ~10.051 S S

0.26- 3.01-CALM 1.5 7.

BRAIDWOOD STATION 3.0oUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPOR T

MP S . ... . . .. . . . . .... . .

FIGURE 2.3-14 DECEMBER WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOOD SITE (1974-1976)

H 10%

WNW ENE 4%E W -. 25 E WSW ESE SW SE 10.27 SSE SSW S

0.26- 3.01-CALM 15i 1.51 3.0 MP0

>7 BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REP(

)RT I M P S. .. . .... . . .

F*URE 2.3-15 ANNUAL WIND ROSE 199-FOOT LEVEL BRAIDWOOD SITE (1974-1976)

N NNE WENWEN W 3,.5L WSW ESE sw SE S

ASW SAI BRAIDWOOO STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-16 ANNUAL WIND ROSE 20-FOOT LEVEL PEORIA, ILLINOIS (1966-1975)

N wF S

81:12 BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-17 WINTER WIND ROSE 19-FOOT LEVEL ARGONNE, ILLINOIS (1950-1964)

w BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-18 SPRING WIND ROSE 19-FOOT LEVEL ARGONNE, ILLINOIS (1950-1964)

NV s

6ý=Lmph BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-19 SUMMER WIND ROSE 19-FOOT LEVEL ARGONNE, ILLINOIS (1950-1964)

N Io 19.6%0/ a%

w'ý1 BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-20 FALL WIND ROSE 19-FOOT LEVEL ARGONNE, ILLINOIS (1950-1964)

PASQUILL STABILITY CLASSES A D*-_ E F 26-24-BRAIDWOOD 22 -

(199-30 FT) 0 20-18 -+-

16 I F ...... DRESDEN (150-35 FT) z 0 14-- 0 0

o oo o

0 L

o o

12- o LL. o 0 0 0o 10-8-

6- 00

ý 000 0

00 0

0 0 0 00 4- 0 0

0 000 0o 00 0 0 0

'o2 0 0 000

, I . a I 0 9 I

- I "- .I "- .I 0 *I v v I U I I ' I u . I ' .

0

-6.0 -4.5 -3.0 -1.5 1.5 3.0 45 6.0 7.5 VERTICAL TEMPERATURE GRADIENT (°C/100M)

BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-21 VERTICAL TEMPERATURE GRADIENT HISTOGRAMS FOR BRAIDWOOD AND DRESDEN (1974-1976)

II L

-  :~-w-..

Al m

Ib,,

L9~ ~J.

If' r

7

  • 0~

.1.. N- 1 4.:* ..F -~ .

'5

/ ~: ~- L: ~.

I rk

,-%-- 4 -T I f af

'4 _ 0 I 2 3 4 EýI ~ L Scole in Miles f "b 4) -.

Id.4p L! .4 j BRAIDWOOD STATION k - (N~ -J0N UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-22 TOPOGRAPHICAL MAP OF THE SITE VICINITY WITHIN A 10-MILE RADIUS I -

L. , L: ff . .I- ý1ý9 _.' "ýý -

600 N

strip mines 550 600 NNE

--- 777777ý .s trip mines 550 600 NE strip mines 550 600 ENE 550 4.1-600 0,

E 550 600 ESE 550 600 SE 550 600 SSE 550 I I I 0 I 2 3 4 5 Distance, miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-23 TOPOGRAPHICAL CROSS SECTIONS WITHIN A 10-MILE RADIUS OF THE BRAIDWOOD SITE (SHEET 1 OF 3)

600 S

550 600 SSW 550 600 SW 550 600 WSW 550 4-

.4~3 600 w W

=

550 600 WNW 550 600 NW 550 600 NNW 550 I I I I I I 0 *1 2 3 4 5 Distance, miles BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-23 TOPOGRAPHICAL CROSS SECTIONS WITHIN A 10-MILE RADIUS OF THE BRAIDWOOD SITE (SHEET 2 OF 3)

S

.3* a a 3 3 3 3 a a L~.LWOIIH BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FiNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

.FIGURE 23-23 TOPOGRAPHICAL CROSS SECTIONS WITHIN A 10-MILE RADIUS OF THE BRAIDWOOD SITE (SHEET 3 OF 3)

N WNW W

WSW SW SSW BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-24 ANNUAL WIND ROSE FOR 10-METER LEVEL AT CLINTON POWER STATION (5-72 TO 4-73)

N WNW ENE 10.10 E

WSW ESE SSW ----I SSE s

0.26- 3.01-7.00 S...501.51- > 7.0 3.00 BRAIDWOOD STATION MPS NOTE: UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT ANNUAL VALUES BASED ON DATA COLLECTED OCTOBER 1, 1976 FIGURE 2.3-25 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 1977.

ANNUAL WIND ROSE FOR 375-FOOT LEVEL AT LASALLE COUNTY STATION (10-1-76 TO 9-30-77)

N w 6.3E S

1-3 4-mph CALM BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-26 ANNUAL WIND ROSE FOR 35-FOOT LEVEL AT DRESDEN

Figure 2.4-1 Redacted 4 * , . ---

I,7 (L26 Ii II Li Ikljg P~ ~/Q~

I, 7-M.

70U

~

LEGEND:

-0 0 ------- EXISTING DRAINAGE

-.----- ---. NEW DITCHES DIKES P O PROPERTY LINE 3000 0 3000 2 ~ mr SCALE IN FEET BRAIDWOOD STATION To MAZON UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT RIVER 0

FIGURE 2.4-2

-I cFr ------- -4 SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND CHANGES TO EMSITING DRAINAGE FEATURES

\L 7

410 30 410 Io0

(,) : 410 00, 0 PONTIAC BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-3 1012345 SCALE IN MILES SDRAINAGE BASIN OF MAZON RIVER

i,*.*. .*j I--- I t V ~Th --4 fv A,

-VL I'

X

  • ;- I.* - *l*.;. .-. , . .'-* . *-,*i'..:.:*" -* :-,L*.'*-:.';,* .. *..*":

I,! .4.'/.4

  • .4-'.

JW

~.-~~4.~

.4.1

.41...A -]

.4 - . *. **.44 *4~ - t . .

.4.4.4"4'-:.

.444.4.4 4

4y7 £ .4 ;.4.4.4~

-'4.

4

'A

.4.~.4.4-J - :41:1 ~ -. 44 .4 . 44.....~ .44 .4.. .4 4

'4.  : 71,~

t .4;-.

  • .4.4 PC, 4-.-..

I. *(4 P.

~J ~' .JJ~- I (P .i~ A~"~"-~ -~

_Ul

.4 *#4.**.4~ ..

- I 4 At Hl.

.4..'

I-id I V 'L "V

L L

'ý7

'~.44~4 A r"-

.~.4

(~j.4.

4&:.

.4 .4. ~4..

  • v4 .i4 .

-A,

.N~ytEl .4

.4.4 4.

,.4-~,-..4.4 BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 7T, FIGURE 2.4-4

,I S. .1 DRAINAGE AREA OF CRANE AND

.44i 4... -4 A. A ý .4*f " '" ".44 4 4GRANARY CREEKS

REVISION 3 DECEMBER 1991 LEGEND:

lITI0 0 TOWNOR CITY 5 0 5 to IS V GAUGINGSTATION SCALE IN MILES BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-5 DRAINAGE BASIN OF KANKAKEE RIVER

A J4~

~ hd~4'

  • . b*.,'.>

4.

k I

h~b~

,LIWOO:N...** STATION-

  • .. *.  ;.l', .:_

SI? ",.a-*,

% 7 --

L AIDWOOD SAFETY STATION ANALYSIS REPORT BR ,L 4

I"NA

.*.** - -UPDATED FIGURE 2.4-6

' " IHYDROLOGIC NETWORK A M

  • .. . . - *I - -,' .I*.. , I.

Figure 2.4-7B Redacted 220 -

200 -

180 -

qn 160 -

140 -

0 120 -

100 80-60 40 20 0

192 240 288 336 TIME IN HOURS BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-8 UNIT HYDROGRAPH AND PMF HYDROGRAPH FOR KANKAKEE RIVER NEAR WILMINGTON

l- i - ;

z z

z w

49 0

4

IN FEET BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-9 KANKAKEE RIVER STAGE AT CUSTER PARK VERSUS DISCHARGE AT WILMINGTON, ILLINOIS

VA-U.

w 0~

4r I _______ _______________

I ______________________________________________

102 50 a) 512 516 520 524 WATER SURFACE ELEVATION IN FEET BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-10 RATING CURVE FOR KANKAKEE RIVER NEAR WILMINGTON GAUGING STATION

0 C'j Do w

0

6) n N 0 s~j: aNvsflOHJ. N 398VH:)SI(

BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-11 MAZON RIVER 3-HOUR UNIT HYDROGRAPH

Il I IL L 00C) oo 0 0 0

0 0o 0

0 0 0

o

f. (D fl) IT In J SJO NI 398VHOSIC BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-12 3-HOUR UNIT HYDROGRAPH CRANE AND GRANARY CREEKS AT THE CONFLUENCE WITH EAST FORK MAZON RIVER

0 IW 00

-n 0

-i LL0.

U.

zz

.- L.

00 W wr LA.

L? U.

N ___00 z

0 0

0 o

ILL 0

8 Ix a.

x 0.

LL 0

0 z

z b.5 0

0 Io x

w o

U, :D W

0 0

N 0

0 CD 0 W N 0 cy N - -

SAO aNvsAOHI. NI 398VHOSIC BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-14 CRANE AND GRANARY CREEKS PMF HYDROGRAPH

50 570 560 N

a) lI-550 Z

0 540 530 520 500 2500 DISTANCE IN FEET BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-14a TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF THE KANKAKEE RIVER NEAR THE RIVER SCREENHOUSE

590 w

W U- 580

4,570 .EAST FORK S570 I' MAZON RIVER, I.OMILE

- ,UPSTREAM FROM THE

.JUNCTION WITH I GRANARY CREEK 560 1 1 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 DISTANCE IN THOUSAND FEET SECTION X-MU2 590 LL- 580 z

0w 57 4 E.AST 3FORK

> MAZON RIVER, 2.5 MILES WU 570 UPSTREAM FROM THE

-j JUNCTION WITH LU GRANARY CREEK uii 560 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 DISTANCE IN THOUSAND FEET SECTION X-MU I BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-15 CROSS SECTIONS FOR EAST FORK MAZON RIVER UPSTREAM FROM GRANARY CREEK

610 I-J S00 w

IL.

590 0

580 I-w ______________/CRANE CREEK NEAVUNTO 570 WITH GRANARY CREEK 560 0 100 200 300 400 DISTANCE IN FEET SECTION X-CD 610 600 IL 590" 0

580

-J LU 570 560 0 ICO 200 300 400 DISTANCE IN FEET SECTION X-CU BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-16 CROSS SECTIONS. OF CRANE CREEK

610 600 w

Z 590 580

  • 570ANRY CREEK NEAR JUNCTION WITH CRANE CREEK 560 1 0 o00 200 300 400 DISTANCE IN FEET SECTION X-GO 595 w

U-z I-Z 59O00 0

I ~~~GRANARY CREEK30 IE UPSTREAM FR0N THE JUNCTION W WITH CRANE CREEK 585 0 500 1000 1500 2000 DISTANCE IN FEET SECTION X-GU BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-17 CROSS SECTIONS OF GRANARY CREEK

580 LI-w U..

w 0

'-j z

LIJ

.- I wa 568' 1 1 1 1 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 DISTANCE IN HUNDRED FEET BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-17a CROSS SECTION OF GRANARY CREEK JUST UPSTREAM OF EAST FORK MAZON RIVER

590 I- 580 w

w IL z

Z 570 0

4

-J i 560 550 5 10 20 DISTANCE IN THOUSAND FEET SCTION X-MD2_

590 580 ILL z

z_

o 570 4 LUI MAZON RIVER BELOW THE

-1 IU 560 JUNCTION WITH GRANARY CREEK 550 0 5 10 15 DISTANCE IN THOUSAND FEET SECTION X-MD J BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-18 CROSS SECTIONS FOR MAZON RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM GRANARY CREEK

"" * * # - ,om J L.. .... . . .. . . . .

~T~L~;--. - ~ ~p V.. -~~a~Ti - - - - - I.. * -1. * ~.j - .~s-. ~

7T a

I-

! wV ,y t  !

>1 a Lz V) 7- - *'

Ly I r , L.

7"1 n E V I ZMV CAt7K I q3

'~N. ~

A~ ~4 z CT~~

s o

1% 7

~Ii~ S. S S CAE Mir 21, I -t j 1~

3 A 0 0 0 50oo0 F-SCALE IN FEET g r~*

- IL

~uj~

~~rm c~i~ j'[

-I

i~t Go
1 )s' - Eli FIGURE 2.4-19
  • -I.

.30 *. I-'A

,~ 1" U CROSS SECTIONS OF MAZON RIVER.

CRANE AND GRANARY CREEKS

10O5

.91 64

/  !

SECTION X-mu2/

l4 (AJ

'9 w

0 SECTION X-MUI 102 560 570 580 590 600 WATER SURFACE ELEVATION IN FEET NOTE: REFER TO FIGURE 2.4 -19 FOR THE LOCATION OF CROSS SECTIONS BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-20 RATING CURVES FOR EAST FORK MAZON RIVER UPSTREAM FROM GRANARY CREEK

LL.

z w

(A a

2e 10 5 _5 5 5 0 565 570 575 580 595 590 59!

5 WATER SURFACE ELEVATION IN FEET NOTE: REFER TO FIGURE 2.4-19 FOR THE LOCATION OF CROSS SECTIONS BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-21 RATING CURVES FOR CRANE CREEK

ILe 10 00 570 575 580 585 590 595 WATER SURFACE ELEVATION IN FEET NOTE: REFER TO FIGURE 2.4 FOR THE LOCATION OF CROSS SECTIONS BRAIDWOOD STATiON BR*AIDWOOID STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-22 RATING CURVES FOR GRANARY CREEK

U

-SECTION X-MD I L9 Ix 10 4j 550 560 570 580 590 600 WATER SURFACE ELEVATION IN FEET NOTE REFER TO FIGURE 2.4-19 FOR THE LOCATION OF CROSS SECTIONS BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-23 RATING CURVES FOR EAST FORK MAZON RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM GRANARY CREEK

14 f fn 0N In F-0 u.I w WO 4 U)N~cyI ON W t 0 C~In 0I In In _ _ 0 133.4__ NINLLA1 ORAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 24-25 AREA-CAPACITY CURVE FOR BRAIDWOOD POND

.2

- I -

3/4>

N'.

cr.

Ch.

0 L . -9 PEROýi4ERAL ORýA4NAE DTCM

.0NTUZ Zr F=7t F W0-I p -J

DRAJDWOOD STATION BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-28 BRAIDWOOD POND EXCAVATION AND FILL

, "4 -.-- Baa Ba, a a 0.-ne. -

- ... B.. 43 -

5' U

PLAN -OVERFLOW SPiLLWAY 4.I BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-30 PLAN--OVERFLOW SPILLWAY

SECTION 6 §gaaCN 1 SECTION 7-7-.,..

BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT s'CTIo, 5*- FIGURE 2.4-31 sEGTtON-OVERFLOW SPUIWAY

InI

) 597 z

z WATER SURFACEELEVATiCti~

4 /7 I-INFLOW "YOROGRAPH u a: U, U 15

~ INFLOW A'DRIOGRAPH I

I ANITECEDENT5O%PMIF SIORM II_____

I, I JL - ------- ------ 1---------

20 30 4( 9070 s 90 ll0 I,, ~c" 130 'AC la TIME IN HOURS BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-32 PMF INFLOW AND OUTFLOW HYDROGRAPH

0 0D 0

4nc 0

x

___ 0z 0

0 (0 133-q NI NOI.LYA3-13 33vY4fls u3.Lwm

~RAJDWOOD STATION

OVERFLOW /

SPILLWAY---

3000 0 3000 SCALE IN FEET BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-34 LOCATION OF DIKE REACHES FOR WIND WAVE ANALYSIS

  • .IrE. 10 '*111il. t&. II secy.oý 2-2 C.S.- s.-

SEcr i cx i-i,,

5ECTION 18-16 41 ,

iil~qi

  • lr1-l .sE-TIO O(- 4 -:. )

m,*. - -. .. *. ..÷- -.. -c*0 4 15ECtION *3-3Si*

SECTION~. 4-

,. I! .- ,-,i "- ' 5:

-. L -.

Se:r--oN 1- 1/-Zz 5E~TIOW 7-7 (.....a & OrcOct t.3rE -

BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

~. r'~~ 1 ~ A~V~ -

FIGURE 2.4-35 iDOs.J4LLIr.41Z2c..fltLSO.0 Sb UAA*V'U'5 DIKE SECTION AND DETAILS SECTION 17-&7 (..s, Sc-*4~)

,.*BI 51 LEGEND

+ Obserwation WWI.

.... Shrry ftxhn NOTES I. Slurry trcnch depth is 2.0ft.

Into till.

Z. Typical aboorvation well detail is shotm an Figure 2.4-43

3. Water levels In these observation aells are shown

ýPws '14

.17s on Figure 2.4-44(2 shoots).

0 130' AppIodmo* Sacn: I'- iSo'

/

./

BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 40#15E FIGURE 2.4-36 LOCATIONS OF STATION OBSERVATION WELLS

I-Y-A p2' -

ZY -

  • "J L

~, -x LEGEND NOTE C6LW-2 Observatiuon uoti 1. Avompgm"nIIy ground rmter levels low 0 2w0 RIWO TTO an Fihoobermj 2.4 -hw45 i UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-37 LOCATIONS OF POND OBSERVATION WELLS

REVISION 15 - DECEMBER 2014 Sadwc 2 ~ Ih 4 21~tr L r1?L 71' 30-- -

7--~~~~~~~~~ 92°I* ......*q**

50 52 5-..

Legend BRAIDWOOD STATION 7UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT:


10 Mile Radius - Highway Stream Lake Bay or Estuary or Ocean National Park or Forest

  • AN 25 Mile Radius - Major Road Internittent Stream .q= Swamp or Marsh Lake Intermittent State Perk or Forest FIGURE2.4-38 Local Road - Canal Reservoir Lake Dry Local Park or Recreaton Area PUBLICGROUNDWATER SUPPLIES Minor Road - Dam Stream Reservoir Intermittent Nat Forests (Region-Local) WITHIN10 MILESAND 25 MILES Other Road Glacier Canal Urban Areas (Regional)

- Major Ralload Lines

REVISION 15 DECEMBER 2014

REVISION 15 DECEMBER 2014 BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-40 POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE OF THE CAMBRIAN-ORDOVICAN AQUIFER FALL 2007

REVISION 15 DECEMBER 2014 I

BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-41 CHANGES IN GROUNDWATER TABLE LEVELS IN THE CAMBRIAN-ORDOVICAN AQUIFER BETWEEN 2000 AND 2007

t

'FF0I--IFLiHY'.11>0-K OFF<OFEPFROMFUWS, BIJýtR 0ak,)

F.ý WEId FFrF::40h ilit- F IlO F Ol FR:I2,O BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-42A DEEP WATER SUPPLY WELLS WITHIN 2 MILES OF THE STATION AND PREDICTED CAPTURE ZONE REVISION 15- DECEMBER 2014

18 Tll ff t'FO~ FrF AVAA r 0t0 FEET AW~AY. DR~\' >AVE 0 0 0 BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-42 B PREDICTED DRAWDOWN STEADY STATE PUMPING CONDITIONS OF THE WATER SUPPLY WELL REVISION 15- DECEMBER 2014

I 'Ita 2 IdDiameter Blonth PVC Pipe NOTES I. Not drown to scale.

2. Location of observation wells are shown on Figure 2.4-36 SRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-43 TYPICAL DETAIL FOR STATION OBSERVATION WELL

REVISION 3 DECEMBER 1991 t*1 Jultl 'ClOOLS

C :1 15 M  :. ., ft it

]}59 to oOF: 11.:1:11 58W ne; .;i;t. ........... i :Ii! i i!:inl 590

,.,*.It.;p: .. T

.. - 1- 1 : ! ::: " : 1 olv- :  : -

'T 1 *.5..;..-- ..

. .. . . -- i-N:22 589 58i i t

ET ;7 ___ ______

-A Da 53IBB a

K -

jp F:

J 588 12

II

.K.LfE,.- -Ttl-

.,1". .... 77ý m..: it .i.r.... ..

0 i::tr t 7 1: ;i S ~ --.... .........

.t ......- ~ .

X 987 -,

U.

F T:

X. T.,

564

  • J4-2--*. ..

~~T I . 7_____________

591 .. 596.I

~590

-- ,--44599 589 71-T ~

........ .. ......I \r flj 585 I as 7! T 17-7---, :J1 5 84 X11 1?S It' .ir tl 584 1976 NOTES BRAIDWOOD STATION L Location of smtion observation cells 3. Groundwater levels measured in PW-I and UPDATED FiNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT are shon oan Figure 2.4 -36 PW-2 were affected by the excavation of a neaby slurry trench in December.

2. Groendwaeor levels were measured FIGURE 2.4-44 umably In the observation wells.

GROUNDWATER LEVELS INSTATION OBSERVATION WELLS, 1976 (SHEET 1 OF 10)

REVISION 3 DECENBER 1991 S~iJ. itt -,JLA44 4.4,41 QAILMIA ~1OBIS 1 :1 I ~ ' 1 Is I : 1- 1 S IDis ;11 1 ~1 1 M7 3591 is a-z 7,.

1 ~ z*IIIf:

.0

-i~f 590 qr..-- :77

-I 2 ]588~

II.

L; 4!ýz4Z 4

!-7*?K* i '!T*:'.

587 C Mr 1T-7, ýWIN 11:: a . ....

l ....

I..

h  : V'

! C:

I

- - .1: .z~

I a .. . ...........

.9 im .444  %::.

a 1 .... . . . ..

-EiiiH2 m A-.E T-Ia -2:!: :7.. . . . . .

4

.i 585, * , .,t.

................ I

...... ......... 58

.4 .... .. ... . ..  !  !

591.

59C

-J 2 .. ' ... . 588 -I

-5sf I ~ViIj~~..I ___4____

In 2

I..

.8 5sf U-

'j: ~ I 586

.4C

...... . .... 58 586:.:7L 4: ! _________ *I'J N Ia

_asfl I

-J -I :- V. ... .. 58 I .1:

10 It 71 ..1 I IC II 25 25 'II 5 1.. 'tI II 01 J$WA$I ICBPI,&ft, ~CI' .rC NOTES BRAIDWOOD STATION I. LoWios of station obseriolnw* m llis 1976 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT are shown on Figure 2.4-36

2. Groundatoer levels were measured FIGURE 2.4-44 weekly In the observalion aells.

GROUNDWATER LEVELS IN STATION OBSERVATION WELLS, 1976 (SHEET 2 OF 1o)

REVISION 3 DECEMBEER 1991 zz .L . 15 2 i .

592 -1 594 7 _,

590j~r j , 9 588 rT:: T jj~~ see co 58r. H'56 F CtT

.!584 \iýF 11-. '7 .jt t 4* .. 586

-8 -- 7 , 584 Z52~ .71=.t.~s 2 578 ___ -, 578 576 [T576 57 -\ 4L.T

-'. 574 J_ ......

57 572I 57 0..~

___ ___ __ ___ ___ __ _ F F NOTES 1977 I. Localions of stOtion obseotima txolm a WrliroI stole is different tmanorer ame uhown on Figure 2.4-36 sltaion observation well graphs.

2. Groulndater levels were meoamtelk BRAIDWOOD STATION weakly In the observation im:o11. UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4.44 GROUNDWATER LEVELS IN STATION OSSERVATION WELLS, 1976 (SHEET 3 OF 10)

REVISION 3 DECEMBER 1991 JA NUA QY *P

- IL S ~E - -- ~ CO S

.0-8.4Q DEC".&.f 594 5944 592 590

-T~. I 588

.. . .. .. . . 4. . .4 . . 4-. . . . - - . i ~~~~~~F N\~ . d~l~:

1.7* '~L 1 . 2 ]4 588

-4 F 4 '

586 7 .1_ _ _ _ _

586 CJ 584 41: 4j V . 2. _ _- I.,-,.

A. V' 4 A.' P.4-

-- 4 S: j 4L 4~U - ~

.- 44.., 5 84 .

C.

-~~~T 4~4 ~v F K #

580 , -F-- 580 578 5 7 48. -I 576 574 57 04 ~ 1 572,,

E_ _

-'-- 4--l' -- 570 T 568

-i.-7. 7 77;-

T 10 as NOTES 1977

1. Locations of station observation valla 3. Vertical scale Is different than oftier OM Show on Figure 2.4-56 station observation well graphs.
2. Groundwater levels were memrad veekly In 1he observatim tmilo. BRAIDWOOD STATION MATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-44 GROUNDWATER LEVELS W STATION OBSERVATION WELLS. 1976 (SHEET 4 OF 10)

593

-AU-P A.060S B ~l**

flflU*.-

5061*

MOOC.

S ~

MAY

~ 1 J.406 1.so~

2er.,11 1 JULY os.oI s .5 a AUGU" a sas 'I E S Otfl osm s N500 WfYI*3 S44** ..

OCCR-an 593 592 A

I A-592 591 591 590 X71 590 4 OL-' 1 589 j~44- 889 588

-A (ft IkU 587 M IM rl IL C

586 L

.1.

211 1 4A lI 587~

586

.2 585 a _ "7 E 585 hi 584 .:

.T K 584 t

583 I.., SIX 1Th111

.. :q 583 582 .. ~ -~ 4 ~ ~ - -1*. s q T_ 582 581 V Fi T-

  • 1,

- ' EI S81 580 Is. ol l- 580 Ff 579 340430 t .....0*

I A-.03 04046*3Lo AIRLMAy 6 4040*006 540463036 JUhg 640 JULY 0.0 0 1. Is .9 1$1. 1. A...~

...I. 579 OI[Cl[MISll*

UGUM OCTO.B #0 NOTES 1977 BRAIDWOOD STATION I. Locatioms of station obeervathln call ore ,hown on Figure 2.4-36 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

2. Groundwater levels were measured oveaklyIn the observollce =llo. FIGURE 2.4-44 GROUNDWATER LEVELS IN STATION OBSERVATION WELLS, 1976 (SHEET 5 OF 10)

MAI J-N.

595

. * ,.. ,* ... ~~ ........ o:* .

1-IJ A-- .. 7 595 T,*, o s 7,

  • oi = .

594 594 593 TT 593 592 77I "771 '_2 592 591 591 590 _j

----- -- : . i '  : - '- 590 589 0r 589 U,

588 0

588

  • I i * * , I - ":* - ...i
  • 587
  • ....... ...... !. .' _* -. --; : * " : 587 586 586

-T/ LI 585 584 584 583 7i2 583 582 I 582

  • 7 NOTES 1
1. Location of station observation wells BRAIDWOOD STATION are shown on Figure 2.4-36
2. Groundwater levels -we measured UPDATEO FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT weekly in the observation wells.

FIGURE 2.4-44 GROUNDWATER LEVELS INSTATION OBSERVATION WELLS. 1976 (SHEET 6 OF 10)

I ...... ... C. AflIL J meI

1. J.1Y ALIOU.T BF.FrYI'M j£rt 0cTh0 0012C 0000MsI.

5 Is2 . 3

. O 1. .. es 01

1. e. I0s 5.6 .0I.0 1¶1. 1.2. 25 00 .1 2.

.0Ž 810 .1 0 25 3 15 02. s $101 ... ... . .. .. . .. . .- . . . . . . . .. . . ... . . ,."?'3 .. . . . . ... . . . . . . . . ... . . . . 596 I ~ '.!..I~

-:7t 1; 1:- -Vi .- Jt.

595 595 594 594

...... 1.5 593 593 592 592 591 59i -J Sn 590 590 -S

.9 589 589 .E 5.9 588 1 M.1 58aj

____ ___ ________ _  :,J~7 587 587 01012002 3113203 0100200 3 O 320 2 3 0 I7007 586 j586 585 585 584 584 583 58 3

1. 11 1. as a 10 3,s= 2$as .o is :... 01 .. I 2 2 0 0 5 02 3 0 Y 0 5 I WOoC 02 51130 0Cfg Jul*e Jul. *OOhC 0,00 IUIO 1978 NOTES 8RAIDWOOD STATION I. Localeios of stotion obsevation wells UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT are shown on Figure 2.4-36
2. Groundwater levels were measured FIGURE 2.4-44 ceekly In the observation wolIo.

GROUNDWATER LEVELS IN STATION OBSERVATION WELLS. 1976 (SHEET 7 OF 10)

595 S~S 10522 ~S2Z I ... U.-Y 5.0500 aIs .0 1S 1

-11 10 1.22.. 11 1502 1...

  • 1S2 0.

JL 1-E-10 Is20 1.

U~R

.OS 02 (lMK

. Its .. 1 OCYOflA .. 0VESI 5t0,Y202SSIOISEOOSSO,5202S DECISSEW 595

.. ... 7-.7. '

HE TI 594 594 593 593 592 592 591 591 590

  • Xw"i'< 7 .7i-i 590
j
u: .J
  • 589

-~ I" I I 589 588 .S Z 5t*

0 see IaiJ 587 586 p2!: ,  :

586 7-17-______________ -I-,

2 2112p: b Sl S a 0 0 5 S0Y 0s SlY 03 0,rh l 050570005 S **2J II OS 5I t2 f lt 2 P55*2 S50 PSYJS 585 UYA G ST*ff G 50 1 0550102OCME 585 584 534 583 583 582 582 1978 NOTES

1. Location& of station observation aftl BRAIDWOOD STATION aroe shown on Figure 2.4-36 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
2. GOomdusdter levels were mneaowed FIGURE 2.4-44 weekly In thes observation wollo.

GROUNDWATER LEVELS INSTATION OBSERVATION WELLS, 1976 (SHEET 8 OF 10)

JANU-ff TCU..Re. -1LC OAT StifS A-1 aUGS 9(PTC.se clOf utC~jOSO OccUSSO 597 U I. Is a.tI Is 56 2 10229

~1- -~r~i ii 597 596 .. 44;~ ~ z

+ L* +

1 4

~jilLJ

~ 7 595 595 594 594 jjj~j .~U LJj1 593 JtithI M --zt:n Nli 593 592

-J 592

0) .In 7 -*  :, .-'; sjjI ":1;* I~~21I~

- . .J 591 C

  • 590 590 L

.2 589

-2 P lij~ 2 .. 1.. i YT i:h1 h: E~i ~ ~ .. ~A;. I 588 -~~~~~- _ _ _. . .',F1J WE-1:22:~i~_ . ~-+/-

2! v;: 1 2:-T;.~PE t-

74 588 T

587 586 .L.i..

1. LJ_ ____ 586 585 40 r

'd :Ar T 585

  • L 584  ; . .. . l * " I -.
  • f - , [ "I dd14:

" I [

  • f i'l 584

~12ti -t~ 7j~4~

  • tO tO 20 20 0 Is 5 tO IS tO 25 I~EL~ t~ I. Is O*8 Is OIS2 5 Is96 8t S28 11DW
  • io 6s go Io 0cO -nIs

'UL, UUT S'8SS 010 00080m 1978 BRAIDWOOD STATION NOTES UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

1. Locations of station observation wallo ors shown an Figure 2.4-56 FIGURE 2.4-44
2. Grottodwater levels were meem ured weeklIy In the observation callo. GROUNDWATER LEVELS IN STATION OBSERVATION WELLS, 1976 (SHEET 9 OF 10)

U 1. .0oas'sag 0ac55055 s W0 a *o I as 201.50so ao o50o5 ts 1 a o9 . a. 1.0is a. S 1. .0 5 0 0 a. 25 a to Ia iota 597 03 to0I aI S2*

  • 4..11.4...

.I.4 .4 I4..,~t,.4597 596 ~L::l~:,~ 596 4 17-595 595 594 *594 ZZ, a:

593 "L 10=4

= 593 592 592

-J

.4~4Z14~ZZ2i Z-..

591 591

-. 'a---

A 590 590

. --,. . * .*.'* ..  : . P- :: ... . .: .  : ...* ' * -'. . .

L-Cj 77VK, T14 2:-'A 11 589 a-2-41 589 Z:

ILl o'I 5689 50 7-:1 .1- 7.. U . .

nfl? ~ 1 --: a-.7 z!,r*a-*7J*s::* *7I 586

-- ~ ~.  :.: :7~I~~+

.*.....,,I......,.-...~ T~.............  :~ysifla ~ H-1 p1 Xl::

585 a:  ::T.

584 584 t

HTl S s522 aaaa soau~ S a1 0s~o 2 5:,a a

  • isk Bs z za a I 153085 a IC IS *0 as a 10 D15 205 9 ID 1S 20 5 10 *oS*823 so 11 2.a I11 osMiod 1 10 1 20 8 NOTES 1978 BRAIDWOOD STATION I. Locatias of slation obsea-atim eIa are shcan an Figure 2.4-36 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
2. Giawmdwter levels wero mecoureg oeokly In the observotkm volb. FIGURE 2.4-44 GRONIDWATER LEVELS IN STATION OBSERVATION WELLS, 1976 (SHEET 10 OF 10)

592 590 588 586

.4 a 582 Sao Sm 578 574 572 BRAIDWOOD STATION NOTES UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT iI~calian alf- od obsrvaton calls 4.LW-2 os$ gr"eted closed durlg May are ,ia an Figure L.4 -37 1977 dus to carstructtoa of the lake dike. FIGURE 2.4-45 2.Gromdcambros weremeasured weekly in. Ific aboarvotlon colb. AVERAGE MONTHLY GROUNDWATER LEVELS

&Grourdualwr levels Imecered in INLAKE OBSERVATION WELLS LTI-I care Caffted by waelr Iloeat (SHEET I OF 2) to car adjacord ditch (Subsectlam 2.4.13.2.2.2).

592 592 I T 12

-- 4--- I T I I 590 590

--4-4-,--f-LW-t 588 i I+--t i -t-*, -- 1--- -- i-* 588

-i I-- I- I - --

586 586 584 584 LW-5 H- F-582 582 0

- LW-7 a

U 58D 580 LW-4

.1' K. IIi7Ha~z-578 578 LW-6 1ý . I .

i 1 1 i 4 1 K 576

- I VE 574 ---i- f- -F--+ 4 -+-f i i 574

_, _* . . - I

- i -+-- ---4  :: F I S. I i -

I -- 4-- UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 572~r L1U 9 1-Ig-z~

I I I Q IllI*l FIGURE 2.4-45 iBRAIDWOOD STATION AVERAGE MONTHLY GROUNDWATER LEVELS a 19-m- ----- L------------  :ý IN LAKE OBSERVATION WELLS (SHEET 2 OF 2)

00

.Ia uin U- w 0-w Cd 0 t In "on tn J.334 NI NOIJVA3"I BRAIDWOOD UPDATED FSINAL SAFET:V STATION ANALVSIS REPORTi FIGURE 2.4-46 ESSENTIAL COOLING POND AREA-CAPACITY CURVES

( EL. 590'-0 )

Ic

4. SLOWDOWN PIPE m~~~~~ *msiA SRIC m1~T~mJ *. -. ., TER~eIR

-192"Il CIRCULATING WATER SLIPLy PIPE DRAINAGE DITCH

-PROPERTY LINE 200 0 20D 400 SCALE IN FEET

SECTION A-A i'-6" RIPRAP SECTION 8-8 SECTION 0-D EL.590"- O" to 8OTTOd,*Q rE,584'-d0 SECTION C-C BRAIDWOOD STATION 20 o0 0 10 20 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT SCALE IN FEET FIGURE 2.4-48 ESSENTIAL COOLING POND SECTIONS

.3.;

- EM-,

@ JlAý 7 .

-Ism PROFRE AT t, OF MrE elm

_ape_

4t---- -IXL BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

-925L FIGURE 2A-49 EXTERIOR DIKE PROFILE f4MFLEAT I. OF DIKE STA 0 +00 TO STA 49 + 00

--- -- -. a--_

@ ba ft c-PRIEATý OF DIKE BRAJOWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-50 EXTERIOR DIKE PROFILE STA 49 + 00 TO STA 6 + So

I

.j I ~ ~

(

i K~cbj~~' :Z AM

'U-w-n fl~7rJJr~--

I ift =

==i--

=7 TT ---. - -

6-4LmA--:ý_-;_

. - . PH 7F77 r4 Iill

- . .. . -itm

~~2i~i1L. ~T77LW .

-MR.

BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAl. SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-51 EXTERIOR ONKEPROFILE STA 499 + I5 TO STA S40 + 79.6