Letter Sequence Request |
|---|
|
|
MONTHYEARBVY 14-009, Request for Exemptions from Portions of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E2014-03-14014 March 2014
Request for Exemptions from Portions of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E
Project stage: Request
ML14099A0172014-04-0808 April 2014
NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review for Vermont Yankee Exemption from 50.47 and Appx. E
Project stage: Acceptance Review
ML14192A8352014-08-19019 August 2014
Request for Additional Information, Exemption from 10 CFR 50.47 and Appendix E to Allow Reduced Emergency Plan Requirements and Revise Radiological Emergency Response Plan Consistent with Permanently Defueled Reactor
Project stage: RAI
BVY 14-055, Request for Exemptions from Portions of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E - Supplement 12014-08-29029 August 2014
Request for Exemptions from Portions of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E - Supplement 1
Project stage: Supplement
BVY 14-069, Request for Exemptions from Portions of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E - Supplement 22014-10-21021 October 2014
Request for Exemptions from Portions of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E - Supplement 2
Project stage: Supplement
ML15062A1352015-03-0202 March 2015
VR-SECY-14-0125: Request by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements
Project stage: Other
ML15103A4192015-04-24024 April 2015
Letter and Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Related to Request for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements
Project stage: Draft Other
ML15103A4002015-04-24024 April 2015
Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Related to Request for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements
Project stage: Draft Other
ML15138A0942015-05-0101 May 2015
Comment (1) of Clay Turnbull on Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact; Request for Comment
Project stage: Request
ML15159A1832015-06-0101 June 2015
Comment (2) of Kyle Landis-Marinello on Behalf of State of VT on Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact; Request for Comment
Project stage: Request
ML15159A1842015-06-0101 June 2015
Comment (3) of Sandra and Charles Kosterman Opposing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact; Request for Comment
Project stage: Request
NRC-2015-0111, Comment (4) of Susan Pelis Opposing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact; Request for Comment2015-06-0101 June 2015
Comment (4) of Susan Pelis Opposing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact; Request for Comment
Project stage: Request
ML15180A0672015-07-31031 July 2015
Isuance of Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Related to Request for Exemptions from Vertain Emergency Planning Requirements
Project stage: Other
ML15180A0692015-07-31031 July 2015
Issuance of Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Related to Request for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements
Project stage: Approval
ML15180A0472015-12-10010 December 2015
FRN - Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements and Related Safety Evaluation
Project stage: Approval
2015-12-10
[Table View] |
|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter type:NRC
MONTHYEARNRC-2017-0125, Comment (5) of Howard Fairman on Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment2017-06-23023 June 2017
Comment (5) of Howard Fairman on Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
NRC-2015-0157, Comment (1) of Kyle Landis-Marinello on Behalf of State of Vermont on Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station EA for Spent Fuel Funding2017-04-0707 April 2017
Comment (1) of Kyle Landis-Marinello on Behalf of State of Vermont on Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station EA for Spent Fuel Funding
NRC-2015-0111, Comment (4) of Susan Pelis Opposing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact; Request for Comment2015-06-0101 June 2015
Comment (4) of Susan Pelis Opposing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact; Request for Comment
NRC-2015-0004, Comment (21) by Sandra Kosterman on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report2015-03-23023 March 2015
Comment (21) by Sandra Kosterman on NRC-2015-0004 Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
NRC-2014-0260, Comment (27) of Aaron Kisicki, on Behalf of State of Vermont, Dept of Public Service, Opposing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; License Amendment Application; Reopening of Public Comment Period2015-02-0909 February 2015
Comment (27) of Aaron Kisicki, on Behalf of State of Vermont, Dept of Public Service, Opposing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; License Amendment Application; Reopening of Public Comment Period
NRC-2010-0302, Comment (8) of Deborah Brancato, on Behalf of Riverkeeper, Inc., on NRC-2010-0001, Evaluation of the Groundwater Task Force Report: Public Meeting2010-11-0303 November 2010
Comment (8) of Deborah Brancato, on Behalf of Riverkeeper, Inc., on NRC-2010-0001, Evaluation of the Groundwater Task Force Report: Public Meeting
2017-06-23
[Table view] |
Text
RULES KdW) [I1FNICTIVES
!?{[
- .JF~ As of: 6/2/15 3:17 PM Received: June 01, 2015 Status: PendingPost PUBLIC SUBMISSION 2015 Jl¶-2 PM14 : 3 Tracking No. ljz-8j6n-zz51 Comments Due: June 01, 2015 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2015-01 11 1F*DFD Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power'Station Comment On: NRC-2015-01 11-0001 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact; Request for Comment Document: NRC-2015-0111 -DRAFT-0004 Comment on FR Doc # 2015-10126 Submitter Information Name: Susan Pelis - c ;2/
Address:
60 Crescent St.
Greenfield, MA, 01301 Email: smp64@verizon.net General Comment Comments for Docket ID = NRC-2015-01 11 I want to go on record opposing Vt.Yankees elimination of the 10 mile EPZ, increasing the present notification time for an accident from the present 15 minutes to 60 minutes, and the elimination of these safeguards and real time monitoring of VY that will cease April 2016. Many State of Vermont officials, as well asMassachusetts towns in our area, have voiced their concerns as well.
Even though VY is closed, over 900 tons of highly radioactive fuel remains at Vermont Yankee. It is stored in a pool 6 stories high. Until all of the highly radioactive fuel is moved from the over-packed fuel pool into dry cask storage,the EPZ needs to be maintained and we need to receive sufficient notification time in case of an accident.Moving the fuel into storage is dangerous. Michael Howe, FEMA nuclear health physicist, says as long as highly radioactive nuclear fuel is hot, even if its in the spent fuel pool, emergency planning including plans for mass evacuation is necessary.
With VY downsizing its staff, is there enough security and oversight to protect citizens from terrorist threats?
And if we lose power due to severe weather, or if the grid goes down for any other reason, will the back-up generators be sufficient to cool the spent fuel to ensure public safety?
These questions are important to consider especially after 9/11 and Fukushimaa plant that was the same Mark 1 6o1 &*z 33 :7-
Boiling Water Reactor as VY. When the disaster happened in Fukushima, the US government advised US citizens to evacuate if they were within 50 miles! So you do not need to live within the 10 miles EPZ to be affected by an accident at VY. There are close to 3,000 spent fuel rods3 million curies of highly radioactive spent fuelin the temporary spent fuel pool at VY. Hiroshima was only 2,000 curies!
VY is very close to an elementary school. Also, VY sits on 124 acres and sits in the middle of a village, compared to other decommissioned nuclear plants, that have a larger footprint of 6,700 to 12,000 acres. These are more reasons we need to continue the EPZ and all emergency planning.
The NRC needs to protect the public and continue ensuring our safety by making sure that Vermont Yankee continues the Emergency Planning Zone and all emergency plans that are currently in existence until all of the spent fuel is put into dry cask storage.
Submitted by:
Susan Pelis Greenfield, MA 01301
