NL-10-030, Indian Point, Unit 2, Revised Proposed Revision to Reactor Vessel Surveillance Capsule Withdrawal Schedule, Appendix H

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Indian Point, Unit 2, Revised Proposed Revision to Reactor Vessel Surveillance Capsule Withdrawal Schedule, Appendix H
ML100750251
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 03/08/2010
From: Joseph E Pollock
Entergy Nuclear Northeast
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-10-030
Download: ML100750251 (7)


Text

S=Entergy Entergy Nuclear Northeast Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249 Tel 914 734 6700 Joseph Pollock Site Vice President Administration March 8, 2010 NL-10-030 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001

SUBJECT:

Revised Proposed Revision to Reactor Vessel Surveillance Capsule Withdrawal Schedule Per 10 CFR 50, Appendix H Indian Point Unit Number 2 Docket No. 50-247 License No. DPR-26

REFERENCE:

1 Entergy Letter to NRC, NL-1 0-025, "Proposed Revision to Reactor Vessel Surveillance Capsule Withdrawal,'

dated March 4, 2010.

Dear Sir or Madam:

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy) requested, Reference 1, NRC approval of a revision to the reactor vessel surveillance specimen withdrawal schedule in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 50, Appendix H, Section III.B.3. Entergy discussed that request with the NRC in a telecom on March 5, 2010. A revision to the proposed surveillance capsule revision in reference 1 reflects that telecom. The acceptance criteria used for the surveillance capsule schedule revision remains the same. Approval is requested by March 18, 2010.

Docket No. 50-247 NL-10-030 Page 2 of 2 There are no new commitments identified in this submittal.

If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Mr. Robert Walpole, Manager, Licensing at (914)734-6710.Sincerely, JEP/sp Attachment

1. REVISED PROPOSED REVISION TO REACTOR VESSEL SURVEILLANCE CAPSULE WITHDRAWAL SCHEDULE PER 10 CFR 50, APPENDIX H cc: Mr. John P. Boska, Senior Project Manager, NRC NRR DORL Mr. Samuel J. Collins, Regional Administrator, NRC Region 1 NRC Resident Inspectors Mr. Francis J. Murray, Jr., President and CEO, NYSERDA Mr. Paul Eddy, New York State Dept. of Public Service ATTACHMENT I TO NL-10-030 REVISED PROPOSED REVISION TO REACTOR VESSEL SURVEILLANCE CAPSULE WITHDRAWAL SCHEDULE PER 10 CFR 50, APPENDIX H ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-247 Docket No. 50-247 NL-10-030 Attachment 1 Page 1 of 4 1.0 REQUIREMENTS Appendix H of 10 CFR 50 (Reference
1) describes reactor vessel material surveillance program requirements.

Paragraph (111)(B)(3) requires "A proposed withdrawal schedule must be submitted with a technical justification as specified in Section 50.4. The schedule must be approved prior to implementation." Reference 2 allows NRC approval of the proposed changes to the withdrawal schedule without a license amendment if the changes conform with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard E 185 (Reference 3).2.0 PROPOSED CHANGES The proposed change revises the withdrawal schedule for two of the surveillance capsules which remain in the reactor vessel by adding the flexibility to withdraw capsule S and designating capsule U as a spare. The current schedule and proposed changes are identified in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.

Table 1 -Current Withdrawal Schedule The following is a list of the surveillance program capsules along with the actual (past)and anticipated (future) withdrawal schedule based on the latest fluence and embrittlement calculations performed in accordance with the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.99, Revision 2 (WCAP-15629).

Capsule Location Lead Factor Withdrawal Date T 3200 3.42 End of Cycle 1 Y 2200 3.48 End of Cycle 2 Z 400 3.53 End of Cycle5 V 40 1.18 End of Cycle 8 S 1400 3.5 Retired in Place U* 1760 1.2 End of Cycle 19 W* 1840 1.2 End of Life X* 3560 1.2 Spare*The withdrawal schedule of these capsules is interchangeable due to common materials and lead factors.

Docket No. 50-247 NL-10-030 Attachment 1 Page 2 of 4 Table 2 -Proposed Withdrawal Schedule Capsule Location Lead Factor Withdrawal Date T 3200 3.42 End of Cycle 1 Y 2200 3.48 End of Cycle 2 Z 400 3.53 End of Cycle5 V 40 1.18 End of Cycle 8 S 1400 3.5 Retired in Place" U* A1760 1.2 Spare W* 1840 1.2 End of Life***X* 3560 1.2 Spare*The withdrawal schedule of these capsules is interchangeable due to common materials and lead factors.Capsule S may be withdrawn during the RFO19 if modified tooling capable of removing the capsule is available.

If not withdrawn no capsule is required.

If withdrawn testing will be coordinated with the industry to optimize the usefulness of the test data.***At end of life as currently licensed, Capsule W (or U or X) will be withdrawn.

The following table provides detailed fluence levels for each of the capsules.Table 3 -Capsule Fluence levels Capsule Capsule Lead Withdrawal Withdrawal Capsule Location Factor Outage EFPY (vessel) Fluence (n/cm 2)T 3200 3.42 RFO1 1.42 2.53 x 10"'Y 2200 3.48 RFO2 2.34 4.55 x 101s Z 4 0 0 3.53 RFO5 5.17 1.02 x 1019 V 40 1 .18 RFO8 8.6 4.92 x 101" S 1400 3.5 *RFO19 or 26.0 (approx) 3.8 x 10'9 retired in place (approx) ***U** 1760 1.2 *RFO19 or Spare 26.0 (approx) 1.3 x 10'9 (approx) ***W** 1840 1.2 End of Life EOL (32 EFPY) 1.5x10" X** 3560 1.2 N/A Spare N/A Notes: *Capsule S will be withdrawn if possible and if not then retired in place**The withdrawal schedule for these three capsules is interchangeable due to the common lead factor and the common materials in the capsules.

Docket No. 50-247 NL-10-030 Attachment 1 Page 3 of 4 Fluence values obtained from Westinghouse letter IPP-01-079, dated April 26, 2001.3.0 TECHNICAL ANALYSIS This request proposes to revise the surveillance capsule withdrawal schedule to allow the attempted removal of Capsule S which is currently retired in place, and to allow capsule U to be declared a spare. If capsule S cannot be successfully removed then it will be maintained as retired in place. It is desired to remove Capsule S at this time since its fluence exceeds 2 times the currently licensed life and exceeds the peak vessel fluence of 1.90 x 1019 at the end of the 48 EFPY projected if License renewal is granted. Westinghouse recently advised that they had increased the load capability of the capsule removal tool and believe that Capsule S could now be removed. Capsule S was retired in RFO16 when the maximum tool removal load was reached and the capsule could not be withdrawn.

The attempt to remove Capsule S at this time is desirable since it is the last remaining capsule with weld material.

Because of the high lead factor of 3.5, Capsule S will have been exposed to a fluence level of approximately 90 EFPY by RFO19. Additional fluence beyond these levels could result in exceeding the fluence limits provided in ASTM E 185 decreasing the usefulness of the data to assess future condition of the belt line materials.

The current withdrawal schedule was approved in 2004 when capsule S was stuck (Reference 4). The surveillance capsules are used to monitor the beltline materials.

The surveillance capsules are located closer to the core than the reactor vessel beltline materials so that fracture toughness testing can be used to determine the nil-ductility transition temperature of the vessel at a later time in life.1 OCFR50, Appendix H requires that the surveillance capsule program "... must meet the requirements of the edition of ASTM E 185 that is current on the issue date of the ASME Code to which the reactor vessel was purchased".

For IP2, this is the 1966 Edition of ASTM E 185. Appendix H also requires that "...For each capsule withdrawal, the test procedures and reporting requirements must meet the requirements of ASTM E 185-82 to the extent practicable for the configuration of the specimens in the capsule".Therefore, for IP2 the surveillance capsule withdrawal schedule is based on the 1966 Edition of ASTM E 185, although the IP2 schedule has been upgraded to meet the requirements of the 1982 Edition of ASTM E 185 to the extent practicable.

Since the peak ARTPTS increase due to fluence exceeds 2000 F, ASTM E 185 requires that five capsules be withdrawn.

To date, four capsules have been withdrawn (capsules T, Y, Z and V) with four capsules (i.e. capsules S, U, W and X) remaining in the vessel.Capsule W is currently scheduled to be the fifth (i.e. the EOL) capsule to satisfy the withdrawal requirements of ASTM E 185.

Docket No. 50-247 NL-10-030 Attachment 1 Page 4 of 4 In addition to the requirements of ASTM E 185, capsule U is also scheduled to be withdrawn during the upcoming end of cycle 19 refueling outage. Since capsule U is not required to meet the requirements of ASTM E 185 (i.e. capsule U is the sixth capsule), designating Capsule U as a spare, even if Capsule S cannot be withdrawn, will have no adverse impact on compliance with the requirements of ASTM E 185.

4.0 REFERENCES

1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix H, "Reactor Vessel Material Surveillance Program Requirements." 2. NRC Administrative Letter 97-04, "NRC Staff Approval For Changes to 10 CFR 50, Appendix H, Reactor Vessel Surveillance Specimen Withdrawal Schedules," dated September 30, 1997.3. ASTM Standard E185, "Standard Practice for Conducting Surveillance Tests for Light-Water Cooled Nuclear Power Reactor Vessels".4. NRC letter dated November 16, 2004, Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No.2 regarding the Reactor Vessel Capsule Withdrawal Schedule Changes (TAC No.MC5059)