ML24159A190

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (Ufsar), Revision 32, Chapter 14, Section 14.1, Figures 14.1-1 to 14.1.13-6 (Unit 1)
ML24159A190
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 05/30/2024
From:
Indiana Michigan Power Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML24159A261 List: ... further results
References
AEP-NRC-2024-20
Download: ML24159A190 (1)


Text

UFSAR Revision 32.0

INDIANA AND MICHIGAN POWER Revised: 27.0 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Chapter: 14 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Sheet: 1 of 1

Note: O peration at an RCS pressure of 2 10 0 psia is no longer supported by the safety analyses; however, some safety analyses performed at reduced RCS pressure and temperature conditions were evaluated and demonstrated to remain bounding for the Return to RCS NO P / NO T program. H ence, this figure has been maintained for completeness.

UFSAR Figure: 14.1-1 Change

Description:

UCR-2 0 5 4, Rev. 0 Unit 1

Title:

Illustration of O vertemperature and O verpower T roction Nonal avg = 7 6.3°F - Nominal P ressure = 2 10 0 psia UFSAR Revision 32.0

INDIANA AND MICHIGAN POWER Revised: 27.0 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Chapter: 14 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Sheet: 1 of 1

Note: O peration at an RCS pressure of 2 10 0 psia is no longer supported by the safety analyses; however, some safety analyses performed at reduced RCS pressure and temperature conditions were evaluated and demonstrated to remain bounding for the Return to RCS NO P / NO T program. H ence, this figure has been maintained for completeness.

UFSAR Figure: 14.1-2 Change

Description:

UCR-2 0 5 4, Rev. 0 Unit 1

Title:

Illustration of O vertemperature and O verpower T roction Nonal avg = 5 3.0°F - Nominal P ressure = 2 10 0 psia UFSAR Revision 32.0

INDIANA AND MICHIGAN POWER Revised: 27.0 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Chapter: 14 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Sheet: 1 of 1

Note: O peration at an RCS pressure of 2 10 0 psia is no longer supported by the safety analyses; however, some safety analyses performed at reduced RCS pressure and temperature conditions were evaluated and demonstrated to remain bounding for the Return to RCS NO P / NO T program. H ence, this figure has been maintained for completeness.

UFSAR Figure: 14.1-3 Change

Description:

UCR-2 0 5 4, Rev. 0 Unit 1

Title:

Illustration of O vertemperature and O verpower T roction Nonal avg = 7 6.3°F - Nominal P ressure = 2 2 5 0 psia UFSAR Revision 32.0

INDIANA AND MICHIGAN POWER Revised: 27.0 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Chapter: 14 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Sheet: 1 of 1

UFSAR Figure: 14.1-3 A Change

Description:

UCR-2 0 5 4, Rev. 0 Unit 1

Title:

Illustration of O vertemperature and O verpower T roction Nonal avg = 7 5.4°F - Nominal P ressure = 2 2 5 0 psia 80 r,\\.............

75 1 \\

\\ t

70 \\, \\ \\ \\

65 \\ \\ \\ 1 \\

Lh \\ f ov

55

\\ \\ 1 \\ \\ SG Sderv 1 50

0

45 :

40

3s I i ii \\ I

  • 8 : 8 30 [ L \\ 'I-600

_. DONALD C. COOK NucLEAFtPLAKT UMTl

OverpowCrAf 533.0'F 2250 psi*

.v r

. JULY i997 Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 Normalized Negative Reactivity Insertion as a Function of Time Used for the Reactor Trip In Transient Safety Analysis

1 7

0.9

0.8

s 5 0.7 3.

.2

$ 0.6 g......

2 0.5 _... -.

H

0.4... -

.- 5 E is 0.3......,.

z..__..... -..... _.._._.......

i 0.2

.............e........... a..... a.......

.......... s............. I. e..

0.1.....

1 :*;

CI 0

0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 2 t 2.8 3.2 Time After Rod Drop Begins (seconds)

Figure 14.1-5 Trip Reactivity vs. Rod Drop Time

JULY 1997

= 03 t.-

5 c 0.4

d d 0.3

0.0

lime [s]

DONALD C. COOK NucLEARPLANT UNIT1

FIGURE 14.1.1-I Nuclear Power and Hoc Channel Heat Flux vs. Tii For he Rod Whdmwal From Subcriticd Event

JULY 1997 0 5 IO I5 20 25 lrns (s]

800 -

z 750 -

e

DONALDC.COOK NUCLEARPLANT UNIT1

FIGURE 14.1.1-2

Fuel Avenge aod Clad Tanpcratu~~ vs. Trm For The Rod Wubdrawal From Subcritical Event

JULY 1997 Revision: 18.1 Change

Description:

UCR-1667

Title:

Nuclear Power vs. Time For The RCCA Withdrawal AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER At Power Event, Full Power, 80 PCM/Sec. Insertion COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Rate Maximum Reactivity Feedback NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP BRIDGMAN, MICHIGAN UFSAR Figure: 14.1.2-1 Sheet 1 of 1

Unit 1 Revision: 18.1 Change

Description:

UCR-1667

Title:

Pressurizer Pressure and Pressurizer Water Volume AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER vs. Time For The RCCA Withdrawal At Power Event COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Full Power, 80 PCM/Sec. Insertion Rate Maximum NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP Reactivity Feedback BRIDGMAN, MICHIGAN UFSAR Figure: 14.1.2-2 Sheet 1 of 1

Unit 1 Revision: 18.1 Change

Description:

UCR-1667

Title:

Core Average Temperature and DNBR vs. Time For AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER The RCCA Withdrawal At Power Event, Full Power, COOK NUCLEAR PLANT 80 PCM/Sec. Insertion Rate Maximum Reactivity NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP Feedback BRIDGMAN, MICHIGAN UFSAR Figure: 14.1.2-3 Sheet 1 of 1

Unit 1 Revision: 18.1 Change

Description:

UCR-1667

Title:

Nuclear Power vs. Time For The RCCA Withdrawal AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER At Power Event, Full Power, 4 PCM/Sec. Insertion COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Rate Maximum Reactivity Feedback NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP BRIDGMAN, MICHIGAN UFSAR Figure: 14.1.2-4 Sheet 1 of 1

Unit 1 Revision: 18.1 Change

Description:

UCR-1667

Title:

Pressurizer Pressure and Pressurizer Water Volume AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER vs. Time For The RCCA Withdrawal At Power Event COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Full, Power, 4 PCM/Sec. Insertion Rate Maximum NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP Reactivity Feedback BRIDGMAN, MICHIGAN UFSAR Figure: 14.1.2-5 Sheet 1 of 1

Unit 1 Revision: 18.1 Change

Description:

UCR-1667

Title:

Core Average Temperature and DNBR vs. Time For AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER The RCCA Withdrawal At Power Event, Full Power, 4 COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PCM/Sec. Insertion Rate Maximum Reactivity NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP Feedback BRIDGMAN, MICHIGAN UFSAR Figure: 14.1.2-6 Sheet 1 of 1

Unit 1 Revision: 18.1 Change

Description:

UCR-1667

Title:

Minimum DNBR vs. Reactivity Insertion Rate For The AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER RCCA Withdrawal At Power Event, 100% Power COOK NUCLEAR PLANT NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP BRIDGMAN, MICHIGAN UFSAR Figure: 14.1.2-7 Sheet 1 of 1

Unit 1 Revision: 18.1 Change

Description:

UCR-1667

Title:

Minimum DNBR vs. Reactivity Insertion Rate For The AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER RCCA Withdrawal At Power Event, 60% Power COOK NUCLEAR PLANT NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP BRIDGMAN, MICHIGAN UFSAR Figure: 14.1.2-8 Sheet 1 of 1

Unit 1 Revision: 18.1 Change

Description:

UCR-1667

Title:

Minimum DNBR vs. Reactivity Insertion Rate For The AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER RCCA Withdrawal At Power Event, 10% Power COOK NUCLEAR PLANT NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP BRIDGMAN, MICHIGAN UFSAR Figure: 14.1.2-9 Sheet 1 of 1

Unit 1

0.0 I 0 3 4 6 8 10

Tme (s]

DONALDC.COOK NUCLEARPLANT UNIT1

FGURE 14.1.6-1 Total Core Flow vs. Time for Rx Coqletc Los Of Flow Event

JULY 1997 0 $ 4 6 8 IO Time [s]

0 2 4 6 8 IO Tme [s]

DONALDC.COOK NUCLEARPLANT UNIT1

FIGURE 14. I.62

Nuclear Power and Ressurizcr Pressure vs. Tinx for The Compictc Loss Of Flow Event

JULY 1997 1.6

E lef t I 6 = B E 2 08-

5 Z 3 u = 0.4 -

nn + I V. 0 I

l Heat fluxes are shown i _. m. 1 uafracuonofche nomtnid average chatu)ei beu flux DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT1

FIGURE 14.1.6-3

Average and Hot Channel Heat !Gxcs and DrUBR vs. Tim for rht Complete Loss Of Flow Event

JULY 1997 r

Tme [s]

0.0 L 0 2 4 6 8 IO

Tme (s]

DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1

FIGURE 14.1.6-4 Total Core Row and Faulted Loop Flow vs. Tie for The Pamal Loss Of Flow Event

JULY 1997 b

rjme [s]

DONALDC.COOK NUCLEARPLANT UNIT1

FIGURE 14.1 b-5 Suclcar Power and Prtssuriztr Pressure vs. Tinr for

/ The Partial Loss Of Flow Event

I JULY 1997 0.0 i 0 2 4 6 8 10 Tme [s]

0 2 4 6 8

-lime [s]

l Hear fluxes are shown as a fraction of the nominal average channel heat flux

FIGURE 14.1.6-6

Average and Hot Channel Heat Fluxes and DYBR vs. Time for tic Partial Loss Of Flow Event

JULY 1997 4 b 8 IO Time [s]

4 6 8 10 Time [s]

DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1

FIGURE 14.1 A-7 Total Core now and Faulted Loop Flow vs. Tii For The Locked Rotor Event

JULY 1997 lime [s]

4 6 8 Time [s]

DONALDC.COOK NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT1

RGURE 14.1.6-8 Nuclear Power and RCS Pressure vs. Time For The bckd Rotor Event

JULY 1997 0.0 0 2 4 6 8 IO

rrne [s]

2 4 6 IO Tme [s]

l Heat fluxes are shown as a fraction of the normnal average channel heat flux

FIGURE 14.1.6-9

Average and Hot Channel Heat Fluxes vs. Time and Clad Inner Tempcraturr vs. Time For The Locked Rotor Event JULY 1997 Revision: 18.1 Change

Description:

UCR-1667

Title:

Nuclear Power and DNBR vs. Time For Loss of Load, AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER Minimum Reactivity Feedback With Pressurizer COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Spray and PORVs NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP BRIDGMAN, MICHIGAN UFSAR Figure: 14.1.8-1 Sheet 1 of 1

Unit 1 Revision: 18.1 Change

Description:

UCR-1667

Title:

Pressurizer Pressure and Pressurizer Water Volume AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER vs. Time For Loss of Load, Minimum Reactivity COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Feedback With Pressurizer Spray and PORVS NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP BRIDGMAN, MICHIGAN UFSAR Figure: 14.1.8-2 Sheet 1 of 1

Unit 1 Revision: 18.1 Change

Description:

UCR-1667

Title:

Vessel Average and Loop 1 Temperatures vs. Time AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER For Loss of Load, Minimum Reactivity Feedback With COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Pressurizer Spray and PORVs NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP BRIDGMAN, MICHIGAN UFSAR Figure: 14.1.8-3 Sheet 1 of 1

Unit 1 Revision: 18.1 Change

Description:

UCR-1667

Title:

Nuclear Power and DNBR vs. Time For Loss of Load, AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER Maximum Reactivity Feedback With Pressurizer COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Spray and PORVs NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP BRIDGMAN, MICHIGAN UFSAR Figure: 14.1.8-4 Sheet 1 of 1

Unit 1 Revision: 18.1 Change

Description:

UCR-1667

Title:

Pressurizer Pressure and Pressurizer Water Volume AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER vs. Time For Loss of Load, Maximum Reactivity COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Feedback With Pressurizer Spray and PORVs NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP BRIDGMAN, MICHIGAN UFSAR Figure: 14.1.8-5 Sheet 1 of 1

Unit 1 Revision: 18.1 Change

Description:

UCR-1667

Title:

Vessel Average and Loop 1 Temperatures vs. Time AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER For Loss of Load, Maximum Reactivity Feedback COOK NUCLEAR PLANT With Pressurizer Spray and PORVs NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP BRIDGMAN, MICHIGAN UFSAR Figure: 14.1.8-6 Sheet 1 of 1

Unit 1 UNIT 1

16.6 Revised per 99-UFSAR-1540

REV. Description NO Revision

Title:

Nuclear Power and DNBR vs. Time For Loss of Load, Minimum Reactivity Feedback Without Pressurizer Spray and PORVs

DWG. NO. UFSAR FIG 14.1.8-7 SH 1 of 1 UNIT 1

16.6 Revised per 99-UFSAR-1540 REV. NO Description

Revision

Title:

Pressurizer Pressure and Pressurizer Volume vs. Time For Loss of Load, Minimum Reactivity Feedback Without Pressurizer Spray and PORVs

DWG. NO. UFSAR FIG 14.1.8-8 SH 1 of 1 UNIT 1

16.6 Revised per 99-UFSAR-1540 REV. NO Description

Revision

Title:

V essel Average and Loop 1 Temperatures vs. Time For Loss of Load, Minimum Reactivity Feedback Without Pressurizer Spray and PORVs

DWG. NO. UFSAR FIG 14.1.8-9 SH 1 of 1 UNIT 1

16.6 Revised per 99-UFSAR-1540

REV. NO Description

Revision

Title:

Nuclear Power and DNBR vs. Time For Loss of Load, Maximum Reactivity Feedback Without Pressurizer Spray and PORVs

DWG. NO. UFSAR FIG 14.1.8-10 SH 1 of 1 UNIT 1

16.6 Revised per 99-UFSAR-1540 REV. NO Description

Revision

Title:

Pressurizer Pressure and Pressurizer Water Volume vs. Time For Loss of Load, Maximum Reactivity Feedback Without Pressurizer Spray and PORVs

DWG. NO. UFSAR FIG 14.1.8-11 SH 1 of 1 UNIT 1

16.6 Revised per 99-UFSAR-1540

REV. NO Description

Revision

Title:

Vessel Average and Loop 1 Temperatures vs. Time For Loss of Load, Maximum Reactivity Feedback Without Pressurizer Spray and PORVs

DWG. NO. UFSAR FIG 14.1.8-12 SH 1 of 1 UNIT 1

16.6 Revised per 99-UFSAR-1540

REV. NO Description

Revision

Title:

Nuclear Power and Core Heat Flux vs. Time (Loss of Normal Feedwater)

DWG. NO. UFSAR FIG 14.1.9-1 SH 1 of 1 UNIT 1

16.6 Revised per 99-UFSAR-1540 REV. NO Description

Revision

Title:

Pressurizer Water Volume, Pressurizer Pressure and Loop Temperature vs. Time (Loss of Normal Feedwater)

DWG. NO. UFSAR FIG 14.1.9-2 SH 1 of 1 Revision: 18.1 Change

Description:

UCR-1667

Title:

Nuclear Power and Pressurizer Pressure vs. Time For AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER Single Loop Feedwater Malfunction With Automatic COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Rod Control at Full Power NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP BRIDGMAN, MICHIGAN UFSAR Figure: 14.1.10-1 Sheet 1 of 1

Unit 1 Revision: 18.1 Change

Description:

UCR-1667

Title:

Core Average Temperature and DNBR vs. Time For AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER Single Loop Feedwater Malfunction With Automatic COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Rod Control at Full Power NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP BRIDGMAN, MICHIGAN UFSAR Figure: 14.1.10-2 Sheet 1 of 1

Unit 1 Revision: 18.1 Change

Description:

UCR-1667

Title:

Nuclear Power and Pressurizer Pressure vs. Time For AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER Single Loop Feedwater Malfunction With Manual Rod COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Control at Full Power NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP BRIDGMAN, MICHIGAN UFSAR Figure: 14.1.10-3 Sheet 1 of 1

Unit 1 Revision: 18.1 Change

Description:

UCR-1667

Title:

Core Average Temperature and DNBR vs. Time For AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER Single Loop Feedwater Malfunction With Manual Rod COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Control at Full Power NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP BRIDGMAN, MICHIGAN UFSAR Figure: 14.1.10-4 Sheet 1 of 1

Unit 1 Revision: 18.1 Change

Description:

UCR-1667

Title:

Nuclear Power and Pressurizer Pressure vs. Time For AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER Multi-Loop Feedwater Malfunction With Automatic COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Rod Control at Full Power NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP BRIDGMAN, MICHIGAN UFSAR Figure: 14.1.10-5 Sheet 1 of 1

Unit 1 Revision: 18.1 Change

Description:

UCR-1667

Title:

Core Average Temperature and DNBR vs. Time For AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER Multi-Loop Feedwater Malfunction With Automatic COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Rod Control at Full Power NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP BRIDGMAN, MICHIGAN UFSAR Figure: 14.1.10-6 Sheet 1 of 1

Unit 1 Revision: 18.1 Change

Description:

UCR-1667

Title:

Nuclear Power and Pressurizer Pressure vs. Time For AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER Multi-Loop Feedwater Malfunction With Manual Rod COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Control at Full Power NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP BRIDGMAN, MICHIGAN UFSAR Figure: 14.1.10-7 Sheet 1 of 1

Unit 1 Revision: 18.1 Change

Description:

UCR-1667

Title:

Core Average Temperature and DNBR vs. Time For AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER Multi-Loop Feedwater Malfunction With Automatic COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Rod Control at Full Power NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP BRIDGMAN, MICHIGAN UFSAR Figure: 14.1.10-8 Sheet 1 of 1

Unit 1

UNIT 1

16.6 Revised per 99-UFSAR-1540

REV. NO Description

Revision

Title:

Nuclear Power and Core Flow vs. Time (Loss of Offsite Power)

DWG. NO. UFSAR FIG 14.1.12-1 SH 1 of 1 UNIT 1

16.6 Revised per 99-UFSAR-1540

REV. NO Description

Revision

Title:

Loop Temperature and Pressurizer Water Volume vs. Time (Loss of Offsite Power)

DWG. NO. UFSAR FIG 14.1.12-2 SH 1 of 1 UFSAR Revision 32.0

INDIANA AND MICHIGAN POWER Revised: 28.0 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Chapter: 14 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Sheet: 1 of 1

This information is still provided for the (removed) B rown B overi low-pressure turbines, as this information is part of the potential missile evaluations that are included in structural design criteria as shown in Table 5.1-1.

UFSAR Figure: 14.1.13 -1 Change

Description:

1 UCR-2 12 2, Rev. 0 Unit

Title:

Cross Section - L.P. Turbine Rotor (Unit 2) (Shown without B lades)

UFSAR Revision 32.0

INDIANA AND MICHIGAN POWER Revised: 28.0 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Chapter: 14 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Sheet: 1 of 1

This information is still provided for the (removed) B rown B overi low-pressure turbines, as this information is part of the potential missile evaluations that are included in structural design criteria as shown in Table 5.1-1.

UFSAR Fi gure: 14.1.13 -2 Change

Description:

UCR-2 12 2, Rev. 0 Unit 1

Title:

Stress in L -P Turbine Rotor Discs at 176% Speed UFSAR Revision 32.0

INDIANA AND MICHIGAN POWER Revised: 28.0 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Chapter: 14 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Sheet: 1 of 1

This information is still provided for the (removed) B rown B overi low-pressure turbines, as this information is part of the potential missile evaluations that are included in structural design criteria as shown in Table 5.1-1.

UFSAR Fi gure: 14.1.13 -3 Change

Description:

UCR-2 12 2, Rev. 0 Unit 1

Title:

Calculated Failure Speeds of L -P Turbine Rotor Discs UFSAR Revision 32.0

This information is still provided for the (removed) General Electric low-pressure turbines, as this is the analysis that bounds other Unit 1 rotating elements. This figure is for the (removed) General Electric low-pressure turbines.

Revision: 24.0 Change

Description:

UCR-1977, Rev. 0

Title:

Sk et c h of Las t St age Regi on - L.P. Tu r b i n e Un i t 1

UFSAR Figure: 14.1.13-4 Sheet 1 of 1

UN IT 1 UFSAR Revision 32.0

DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT SKETCH OF THE LOW PRESSURE TURBINE UNIT 1

This figure shows the Unit 1 low pressure turbine retro-fitted with the low pressure turbine manufactured by Alstom P ower, Inc. It is typical for all three low pressure turbines.

Revision: 24.0 Change

Description:

UCR-1977, Rev. 0

Title:

SKETCH OF THE LOW PRESSURE TURBINE UNIT 1

UFSAR Figure: 14.1.13-4a Sheet 1 of 1

UN IT 1 UFSAR Revision 32.0

INDIANA AND MICHIGAN POWER Revised: 28.0 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Chapter: 14 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Sheet: 1 of 1

This information is still provided for the (removed) B rown B overi low-pressure turbines, as this information is part of the potential missile evaluations that are included in structural design criteria as shown in Table 5.1-1.

UFSAR Fi gure: 14.1.13 -5 Change

Description:

UCR-2 12 2, Rev. 0 Unit 1

Title:

Sk etch of L ow P ressure Turbine Rotor and Casing Unit No. 2 UFSAR Revision 32.0

DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 TURBINE LAST STAGE WHEEL KINETIC ENERGY OF 120º FRAGMENT AFTER INNER CASING IMPACT 43" WHEEL, ZERO RESTITUTION, CASE "C" SECOND PHASE IMPACT (RING IN PARTICLES)

This information is still provided for the (removed) General Electric low-pressure turbines, as this is the analysis that bounds other Unit 1 rotating elements. This figure is for the (removed) General Electric low -pressure turbines.

Revision: 24.0 Change

Description:

UCR-1977, Rev. 0

Title:

UNIT 1 TURBINE LAST STAGE WHEEL

UFSAR Figure: 14.1.13-6 Sheet 1 of 1

UN IT 1