ML24114A056
| ML24114A056 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 03/11/2024 |
| From: | Jeffrey Reed Ameren Missouri, Union Electric Co |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Document Control Desk |
| References | |
| Download: ML24114A056 (1) | |
Text
PROCEDURE REVIEW FORM (PRF) 1.0 Initiation Initiator: James Reed Date: 3/1 1/2024 Procedure I)epi:
EP Document #: EIP-ZZ-0001 0 ADDENDUM E New Rev. #
016 (3 digits ieqttireut)
Title:
LOGISTICS SUPPORT COORDINATOR CHECKLIST 1jel of Use:
ElContinuous ElReference Inforrnatien EMuttiple 2.0 Reason for Change/Description of Change (List coininittnents, CRs, eB Change Reqttests, OERs, Plant 1vIod etc. and recaid iutinbers here.)
CR#202401066 See SOC 3.0.
Document Disposition flTernp Change ElNew Document flMajor Revision Minor ReVision Ejcancellation i::iAdministrative Coireetion DepLileador DesignatedApproverrequiredfoiAdminisitative Corrections(Sinature/PIN/Daeno othersignatures requiwd 4.0 Interim Approval (Temp. Change Only)
Temp. Change #:
Expiration Date:
Cognizant SupclViSt)r (Signaturc/PIN/I)ae)
SRI) (Signature/PIN/Date)
5.0 Comments
Continued: i::
6.0 Reviews and Signatures (NOT requiredfor Administrative t tions)
Reviews Recluired Dept PIN
\\
iate CA0139 Attached Preparer E P 1 36263 3/1 1/24 N/A Technical Review j5
/,/cf Li Yes Technical Review sEP ij%t cJ 3t\\
LI Yes ENo Add 1 Review
ç2
-1q-I S/?/I LI Yes No Add! Review Yes j No LiAdditional Reviews (See Attached CAO]39forms)
Number of additional CAO I 39s:
Type Coordinator PIN Signature Date CA0139 Attached EValidation (Dept. head or Designated Approver) Is a Change Management Plan required?
ElYes Wo w ms attach CA2?73 t)f CA2774)
Is a Cross-Disciplinary review required? LYcs No 7.0 Approval (Either ajroval lutist be cjttatified as PA7YAPVR or PAT/GAIR in (i:ittfarir)
Senior I)irector Ntlear Operations Approval (per APA-ZZ()O1O1) 1t)kt is required in accordance with APAZZ-t)Ot)QI De nri tent I I a4(FhiaI Review and Approval ORC Meeting:
Y3
(.__
3Jtf(
Dept.
lead or [)esignated Appn et (Signature/PIN/I)ate)
/Vc)te: Itiie 2 f?1)VIdCS iIlStItl(tU)J1S tO C()illptefe 1hi /,i,i end,nov be atLu)cfe(i A I 90 (JOt) I 2
35 A2 I t) tJt)62 65 69 M I 9t) Ot)t) 1 Page 1 of 2 APALL t)t) 101 Continued: i::
50.59 Review CA251OL1CA2511 L1CA251 2 f EjN/A (perAPkZ7O)]43)
ThItWUPJJV k
ce/
/ -t Senior 1)irector Nticlear Operations (Signature/PIN/Date)
CA0033 Rev. t)02
50.54(q) Screening Form Document #, Rev #, &
Title:
EIP-ZZ-COOlO_Addendum E, Rev 016, Logisies Suppoi Coordinator Checklist.
EPTracking#:
2024010 Activity Description and
References:
All the changes listed below are based off CR# 202401066.
All-Added ERO Position Job Duty Code to Attachment 3 And attachment 4 For ERO Position Initiation step 9-Added Assistant Dose Assessment Coordinator (CDAS), Plant Assessment Staff (CPAS),
Logistics Support Staff (CCLS)
.Attachrnent 3-Chan9edTSC Communicator to ENS Communicator Activity Scope:
YES NO
_2%vty revisethe Radiojgical Emergency RespunsePlan (RERP)or1mpIementinProcedures9 Change Type:
YES NO Is this activityeditorial or typographical?
Previously Approved Change:
YES NO Is this activity being processed to conform to a previously approved activity9 IfYES, what is the previously approved activity?
Planning Standard Determination:
Does this activity impact any ofthe 50.47(5) Planning Standards or Part 50 Appendix E:
YES NO 50.47(b)(1) - Assignment ofResponsibility (Organization Control)?
E I
50.47(b)(2) - Onsite Emergency Organization9 E
50.47(b)(3) - Emergency Response Support and Resources7 D
50.47(b)(4) - Emergency Classification System9 50.47(b)(5) - Notification Methods and Procedures?
50A7(b)(6)
- Emergency Communications9 E
50.47(b)(7) - Public Education and Information9 E
50A7(b)($) - Emergency facility and Equipment?
E 50.47(b)(9) - Accident Assessment?
fl 50A7(b)(1O) - Protective Response9
,,,... LI 50.47(b)(l 1) - Radiological Exposure Control?
fl 50.47(b)(12) - Medical and Public Health Support?
EJ 50.47(b)(13) - Recovery Planning and Post Accident Operations9 El 50.47(b)(14) - Drills and Exercises?
LI 50A7(b)(15) - Emergency Responder Training9 E
50.47(b)(16) - Emergency Plan Maintenance?
Part50AppendixE?.
E Commitment Impact Determination:
YES NO Does this activity impact a Site Specific EP Commitment not associated with a Planning Standard or Element9 If Yes, record the Commitment number:______________________________________________________
Explanation of Determination: (Enter an explanation to each determination-answer that needs clarftcation.)
None ofthe changes made to EIP-ZZ-C0OlO Addendum E, Rev 016, Logistics Support Coordinator Checklist affect the planning standards. Therefore, a 1O.CfR 50.54(q) evaluation is not required.
File # A210.0038 Page 1 of2 CA1523 KDPZZ-OO4OO Rev. 002
5054(q) Screening Form Screening Evaluation Results:
Based on the results of the information above, can the activity be implemented without performing a YES NO full 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation?
- z:::.
Pre xwer must be quafljied Emergency Response Coordinator.
Reviewer (Sign/PlN)
Date:
t I 1 1 nfl mutt/i ci I..,;
r6,& ttc Response ( c oithnator Emergency Preparedness Manager (Sign/PIN):
(C 3 7 Date:
1 File#A210.0038 Page2of2 CA1523 KDP-ZZ-00400 Rev. 002
APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION Address the questions below for all aspects of the activity. If the answer is YES for any portion of the activity, apply the identified procedures to that portion of the activity. Note that it is not unusual to have more than one process apply to a given activity. Refer to Section 4 of the 10 CFR 50.59 Resource Manual (RM) and the instructions on pages 5-6 for additional guidance.
I.
Activity/Document Number: EIP-ZZ-COO1O Addendum E Revision Number:016_____
Title:
LOGISTICS SUPPORT COORDINATOR CHECKLIST Brief Description of activity (what is being changed and why):
1 All-Added ERO Position Job Duty Code to Attachment 3 And attachment 4 For ERO Position Initiation step 9-Added Assistant Dose Assessment Coordinator (CDAS), Plant Assessment Staff fCPAS), Logistics Support Staff (CCLS)
. - Changed TSC Communicator to ENS Communicator Note: Ifyour proposed change alters a RERP implementing procedure [any EIP-ZZ-XXXX], equipment identified as important to emergency response [refer to KDP-ZZ-00013J, or could alter response time, staffmg, or other items covered in the 1 6 Planning Standards or in Appendix E to Part 50.47(b) [refer to KDP-ZZ-00400],
answer this questioti YES.
If YES no further 50 59 (or 72 48) review beyond this Applicability Determination (AD) is required, but
Response
complete the remainder ofthis form.
Identify the applicable 50.59/72.48 NO El YES Evaluation Log No., License Amendment No., or applicable document number.
Document #
Response
See Section 4.2.1 ofthe RM.
If YES, process per APA-ZZ-00 108 IS?1 NO E YES and GDP-ZZ-00600 and related facility or procedure change programs.
IfYES, process per APA-ZZ-00 108 El YES and SDP-ZZ-00030 for Security Plan and related facility or procedure change programs.
APA-ZZ-OO 143 A170.OOlO Ii.
Does the proposed activity fall within the scope of an activity that has been previously approved by the NRC or for which a 50.59/72.48 Screen or evaluation has already been performed?
(See Section 4.2 ofthe RM.)
III.
Does theproposed
- activity involve a change to the:
1.
Technical Specifications or the Renewed Operating License?
See 10 CFR 50.90.)
2.
Quality Assurance Plan? (See 10 CFR 50.54(a).)
3.
Security Plan which also includes the Cyber Security Plan?
NO (See 10 CFR 50.54(p).)
4.
Radiological Emergency Response Plan (RERP) or Emergency Action Levels (EALS)? (See 10 CFR 50.54(q).)
NO E1 YES YES, process per APA-ZZ-00 108 and FDP-ZZ-00103.
UNO EYES If YES, process per APA-ZZ-00 108 land KDP-ZZ-00400 for RERP and lrelated facility or procedure change programs.
Page 1 CA25 I 0 Rev. 005
APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Continued) 5.
1ST Program Plan? (See 10 CFR 5055a(O.)
NO EYES IfYES, process APA-ZZ-00356 for ASME code compliance and related facility or procedure change programs 6.
ISI Program Plan? (See 10 CFR 50.55a(g).)
NO LIYES If YES, process per EDP-ZZ-O I 003 for ASME code compliance and related facility or procedure change programs.
If YES, indicate the applicable program in Brief Description Section.
2.
A temporary alteration (to procedures or the facility) supporting maintenance (TASM) that will be in effect during at-power operations for 90 days or less?
NO EIYES If YES, process per APA-ZZ-00 101 for procedure changes or APA-ZZ-00605 for facility changes or Procedurally Controlled Temporary Modifications or MDP-ZZ-fSOO1 for freeze Seals.
Evaluate risk using APA-ZZ-003 15, Appendix A.
APA-ZZ-OO 143 A170.OO1O See fP Screening questions in EDP ZZ-04044. Ifany ofthe screening NO EEl YES questions are answered YES, a Fire Protection review is needed in accordance with EDP-ZZ-04044.
IF YES, then contact Regulatory NO ::i YES Affairs/Licensing to determine next steps.
7.
Fire Protection Program? (See Operating License Condition 2.C(5).)
8.
Storage Cask Certificate of Compliance (CoC), including appendices?
(See 10 CFR 72.244.)
9.
Does the proposed activity impact other programs (e.g.,
the ODCM) that are controlled by regulations, the Operating License (including Orders and License Conditions) or the Technical Specifications? (See Section 4.2.1 of the RM.)
Iv.
Does the pi*oposcd activity involve:
1. Maintenance which restores SSCs to their original (as designed) condition?
(See 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4).)
Note: Ifthe maintenance is on ISFSI or cask-related items, the Maintenance Rule does NOT apply, and the activity is subject to a 10 CFR 72.48 Screen on a CA3 145.
NO LIYES
Response
- See Section 4.2.2 ofthe RM If YES, process change per M NO El YES APA-ZZ-00101 for procedure changes or APA-ZZ-00320/3301340 for Maintenance activities.
Page 2 CA2510 Rev. 005
APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Continued)
V Does the proposed idi involve a hangt. to the 1.
FSAR NO flYES If the above response is NO, check N/A in the Response column at right.
Ifthe above response is YES, does the proposed activity involve an FSAR change that may be excluded from the requirement to perform a 50.59 ScreenfEvaluation by NET 9607 or NEI 9803? (Provide a YES or NO response to this question in the Response column at right)
Note: In lieu ofthe exclusion criteria of RM Section 4.2.3, a YES response may also be provided ifthe FSAR change requires no further 50.59 review based on a YES response to the question in Section 11 ofthis Applicability Determination form.)
2.
Technical Specification Bases?
NO Ei YES Ifthe above response is NO, check N/A in the Response column at right.
Ifthe above response is YES, does the proposed activity involve a TS Bases change comparable to that which may be excluded from the requirement to perform a 50.59 Screen/Evaluation by NEI 9&07 or NE! 9803 (as described for an FSAR change)? (Provide a YES or NO response to this question in the Response column at right.)
Note: In lieu ofthe exclusion criteria ofRM Section 4.2.3, a YES response may also be provided if the TS Bases change requires no further 50.59 review based on a YES response to the question in Section II of this Applicability Determination form.)
VI.
Does the proposed activity involve a chmige to:
1.
Managerial or administrative procedures, controls, or activities (including software used only for the implementation of administrative procedures, controls, or activities) governing the conduct of facility operations
(cibectto the coptrol of 11)CFRSfl p
2.
Regulatory commitment not covered by another regulation based qnge process? tSee NEI 99-04. )
VII Does the proposed activity potentially affect the design, operation, or maintenance ofthe ISFSI facility as described in the dry cask storage FSAR or the 72.212 Report? (See fDP ZZ-00l05 and Attachment I ofAPA-ZZ-OO 143.)
Response
See Section 4.2.3 ofthe RM Process the FSAR change per APA-ZZ-00108 and fDP-ZZ-00103 for revising License Documents.
Note:
A NO response in the Response E NO i:i YES column at left means that the FSAR/TS Bases change is one that N/A requires further 50.59 review (i.e., is not excludable from further review).
A YES response means that the FSAR does NOT require further 50.59 review.
Process the TS Bases change per APA-ZZ-OO 10$ and FDP-ZZ-00 103 for revising License Documents.
Note:
A NO response in the Response column at left means that the TS El NO LI YES Bases change is one that requires further 50.59 review (i.e., is not N/A excludable from further review).
A YES response means that the TS Bases Change does NOT require further 50.59 review.
Response
. See Section 4.2.4 1 4.2.6 of the RM.
rc o El YES IfYES. process per APA-ZZ-00 101 or APA-ZZ-00 109.
n YES IfYES, process per APA-ZZ-00540.
If YES, perform a 72.48 Screen per APA-ZZ-00143 unless the change is completely covered by the response to Section 11.
NO LJYES Note:
Editorial or administrative changes are excluded from the requirement to perform a 72.4$ Review.
APA-ZZ-OO 143 A170.OO1O NO Page 3 CA2510 Rev. 005
APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Continued)
VIII. Justification/explanation for Response(s) (as needed):
Ix.
Conclusion:
jipçcts ofthe activity ç controlled by one or more ofthe procedures above, therefore a 50.59 Screen isnot required.
A pjo ofthe activity controlled by one or more ofthe procedures above, therefore a 5059 Screen is required.
- x. Signoffs:
Qualified Preparer:
Qualified Reviewer:
APA-ZZ-OO 143 A17OOO1O Date:
Date:
3 1 ii 1 tV Revision of the RERP Implementing procedure is covered solely by IOCfR 50.54(cij and controlled by KDP-ZZ-00400.
Therefore, I OCFR5O.59 is not required.
Ensure that once signed, this record is loaded into EB with the Activity/Document Number listed above or submit this form to either the Regulatory Affairs clerk or another member ofAdministration in accordance with APA-ZZ-00220.
Page 4 CA25 10 Rev. 005